You are on page 1of 67

McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of

Individuals and Business Entities 2019


Edition - eBook PDF
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/mcgraw-hills-taxation-of-individuals-and-business-
entities-2019-edition-ebook-pdf/
FULLY UPDATED FOR THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

2019 EDITION
TAXATION of INDIVIDUALS AND
McGraw-Hill’s

BUSINESS ENTITIES
SPILKER • AYERS • BARRICK • OUTSLAY • ROBINSON • WEAVER • WORSHAM
McGraw-Hill’s

Taxation of Individuals
and Business Entities
Brian C. Spilker
Brigham Young University
Editor

Benjamin C. Ayers John A. Barrick


The University of Georgia Brigham Young University
Edmund Outslay John R. Robinson
Michigan State University Texas A&M University
Connie D. Weaver Ron G. Worsham
Texas A&M University Brigham Young University
McGRAW-HILL’S TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESS ENTITIES, 2019 EDITION, TENTH EDITION
Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright © 2019 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights
­reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Previous editions © 2018, 2017, and 2016. No part of this publication may be reproduced
or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill
­Education, including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States.
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LWI 21 20 19 18
ISBN  978-1-259-91839-1
MHID 1-259-91839-4
ISSN  1946-7745
Executive Portfolio Manager: Kathleen Klehr Design: Matt Backhaus
Product Developers: Danielle Andries, Erin Quinones Content Licensing Specialist: Lorraine Buczek
Marketing Manager: Zach Rudin Cover Image: © Spotmatik/Alamy
Content Project Managers: Lori Koetters, Jill Eccher, Brian Nacik Compositor: Aptara®, Inc.
Buyer: Susan K. Culbertson Printer: LSC Communications
All credits appearing on page are considered to be an extension of the copyright page.
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website does not indicate an
endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education does not guarantee the accuracy of the information
­presented at these sites.

mheducation.com/highered

Dedications
We dedicate this book to:
My family, whose love and support helped make this book possible, and to Professor Dave Stewart for his
great example and friendship over the last three decades.
Brian Spilker
My wife, Marilyn, daughters Margaret Lindley and Georgia, son Benjamin, and parents Bill and Linda.
Ben Ayers
My wife, Jill, and my children Annika, Corinne, Lina, Mitch, and Connor.
John Barrick
My family, Jane, Mark, Sarah, Chloe, Lily, Jeff, and Nicole, and to Professor James E. Wheeler, my mentor and friend.
Ed Outslay
JES, Tommy, and Laura.
John Robinson
My family: Dan, Travis, Alix, and Alan.
Connie Weaver
My wife, Anne, sons Matthew and Daniel, and daughters Whitney and Hayley.
Ron Worsham
About the Authors

Brian Spilker (PhD, University of Texas at Austin, 1993) is the Robert Call/Deloitte Professor
in the School of Accountancy at Brigham Young University. He teaches taxation at Brigham
Young University. He received both BS (Summa Cum Laude) and MAcc (tax emphasis) de-
grees from Brigham Young University before working as a tax consultant for Arthur Young &
Co. (now Ernst & Young). After his professional work experience, Brian earned his PhD at
the University of Texas at Austin. In 1996, he was selected as one of two nationwide recipi-
ents of the Price Waterhouse Fellowship in Tax Award. In 1998, he was a winner of the
American Taxation Association and Arthur Andersen Teaching Innovation Award for his
work in the classroom; he has also been awarded for his use of technology in the classroom at
Brigham Young University. Brian researches issues relating to tax information search and
professional tax judgment. His research has been published in journals such as The Account-
Courtesy Brian Spilker
ing Review, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of the Ameri-
can Taxation Association, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Journal of Accounting
Education, Journal of Corporate Taxation, and Journal of Accountancy.

Ben Ayers (PhD, University of Texas at Austin, 1996) holds the Earl Davis Chair in Taxation
and is the dean of the Terry College of Business at the University of Georgia. He received a
PhD from the University of Texas at Austin and an MTA and BS from the University of
­Alabama. Prior to entering the PhD program at the University of Texas, Ben was a tax
­manager at KPMG in Tampa, Florida, and a contract manager with Complete Health, Inc., in
Birmingham, Alabama. He is the recipient of 11 teaching awards at the school, college, and
university levels, including the Richard B. Russell Undergraduate Teaching Award, the high-
est teaching honor for University of Georgia junior faculty members. His research interests
include the effects of taxation on firm structure, mergers and acquisitions, and capital markets
and the effects of accounting information on security returns. He has published articles in
journals such as The Accounting Review, Journal of Finance, Journal of Accounting and Eco-
Courtesy Ben Ayers
nomics, Contemporary Accounting Research, Review of Accounting Studies, Journal of Law
and Economics, Journal of the American Taxation Association, and National Tax Journal.
Ben was the 1997 recipient of the American Accounting Association’s Competitive Manu-
script Award, the 2003 and 2008 recipient of the American Taxation Association’s Outstand-
ing Manuscript Award, and the 2016 recipient of the American Taxation Association’s Ray
M. Sommerfeld Outstanding Tax Educator Award.
iv About the Authors

John Barrick (PhD, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, 1998) is currently an associate profes-
sor in the Marriott School at Brigham Young University. He served as an accountant at the
United States Congress Joint Committee on Taxation during the 110th and 111th Congresses.
He teaches taxation in the graduate and undergraduate programs at Brigham Young Univer-
sity. He received both BS and MAcc (tax emphasis) degrees from Brigham Young University
before working as a tax consultant for Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers).
­After his professional work experience, John earned his PhD at the University of Nebraska at
Lincoln. He was the 1998 recipient of the American Accounting Association, Accounting,
Behavior, and Organization Section’s Outstanding Dissertation Award. John researches issues
relating to tax corporate political activity. His research has been published in journals such as
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Contemporary Accounting Re-
Courtesy John Barrick
search, and Journal of the American Taxation Association.

Ed Outslay (PhD, University of Michigan, 1981) is a professor of accounting and the Deloitte/
Michael Licata Endowed Professor of Taxation in the Department of Accounting and Infor-
mation Systems at Michigan State University, where he has taught since 1981. He received a
BA from Furman University in 1974 and an MBA and PhD from the University of Michigan
in 1977 and 1981. Ed currently teaches graduate classes in corporate taxation, multiunit enter-
prises, accounting for income taxes, and international taxation. In February 2003, Ed testified
before the Senate Finance Committee on the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Report on Enron
Corporation. MSU has honored Ed with the Presidential Award for Outstanding Community
Service, Distinguished Faculty Award, John D. Withrow Teacher-Scholar Award, Roland
H. Salmonson Outstanding Teaching Award, Senior Class Council Distinguished Faculty Award,
MSU Teacher-Scholar Award, and MSU’s 1st Annual Curricular Service-Learning and Civic
Engagement Award in 2008. Ed received the Ray M. Sommerfeld Outstanding Tax Educator
Courtesy Ed Outslay
Award in 2004 and the Lifetime Service Award in 2013 from the American Taxation Associa-
tion. He has also received the ATA Outstanding Manuscript Award twice, the ATA/Deloitte
Teaching Innovations Award, and the 2004 Distinguished Achievement in Accounting Educa-
tion Award from the Michigan Association of CPAs. In 2017, Ed received the American Ac-
counting Association / J. Michael and Mary Ann Cook Prize given in “foremost recognition
of an individual who consistently demonstrates the attributes of a superior teacher in the dis-
cipline of accounting.” Ed has been recognized for his community service by the Greater
Lansing Chapter of the Association of Government Accountants, the City of East Lansing
(Crystal Award), and the East Lansing Education Foundation. He received a National Assis-
tant Coach of the Year Award in 2003 from AFLAC and was named an Assistant High School
Baseball Coach of the Year in 2002 by the Michigan High School Baseball Coaches
Association.
About the Authors v

John Robinson (PhD, University of Michigan, 1981) is the Patricia ’77 and Grant E. Sims ’77
Eminent Scholar Chair in Business. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, John was the
C. Aubrey Smith Professor of Accounting at the University of Texas at Austin, Texas, and he
taught at the University of Kansas where he was the Arthur Young Faculty Scholar. In 2009–
2010 John served as the Academic Fellow in the Division of Corporation Finance at the Secu-
rities and Exchange Commission. He has been the recipient of the Henry A. Bubb Award for
outstanding teaching, the Texas Blazer’s Faculty Excellence Award, and the MPA Council
Outstanding Professor Award. John also received the 2012 Outstanding Service Award from
the American Taxation Association (ATA) and in 2017 was named the Ernst & Young and
ATA Ray Sommerfeld Outstanding Educator. John served as the 2014–2015 president (elect)
of the ATA and is the ATA’s president for 2015–2016. John conducts research in a broad va-
riety of topics involving financial accounting, mergers and acquisitions, and the influence of
taxes on financial structures and performance. His scholarly articles have appeared in The Courtesy John Robinson
Accounting Review, The Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Finance, National
Tax Journal, Journal of Law and Economics, Journal of the American Taxation Association,
The Journal of the American Bar Association, and The Journal of Taxation. John’s research
was honored with the 2003 and 2008 ATA Outstanding Manuscript Awards. In addition, John
was the editor of The Journal of the American Taxation Association from 2002–2005. Professor
Robinson received his J.D. (Cum Laude) from the University of Michigan in 1979, and he
earned a PhD in accounting from the University of Michigan in 1981. John teaches courses on
individual and corporate taxation and advanced accounting.

Connie Weaver (PhD, Arizona State University, 1997) is the KPMG Professor of Accounting
at Texas A&M University. She received a PhD from Arizona State University, an MPA from
the University of Texas at Arlington, and a BS (chemical engineering) from the University of
Texas at Austin. Prior to entering the PhD Program, Connie was a tax manager at Ernst &
Young in Dallas, Texas, where she became licensed to practice as a CPA. She teaches taxation
in the Professional Program in Accounting and the Executive MBA program at Texas A&M
University. She has also taught undergraduate and graduate students at the University of
­Wisconsin–Madison and the University of Texas at Austin. She is the recipient of several
teaching awards, including the 2006 American Taxation Association/Deloitte Teaching Inno-
vations award, the David and Denise Baggett Teaching award, and the college and university
level Association of Former Students Distinguished Achievement award in teaching. Connie’s
Courtesy Connie Weaver
current research interests include the effects of tax and financial incentives on corporate deci-
sions and reporting. She has published articles in journals such as The Accounting Review,
Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of the American Taxation Association, National
Tax Journal, Accounting Horizons, Journal of Corporate Finance, and Tax Notes. Connie is
the senior editor of The Journal of the American Taxation Association and she serves on the
editorial board of Contemporary Accounting Research.

Ron Worsham (PhD, University of Florida, 1994) is an associate professor in the School of
Accountancy at Brigham Young University. He teaches taxation in the graduate, undergradu-
ate, MBA, and Executive MBA programs at Brigham Young University. He has also taught as
a visiting professor at the University of Chicago. He received both BS and MAcc (tax empha-
sis) degrees from Brigham Young University before working as a tax consultant for Arthur
Young & Co. (now Ernst & Young) in Dallas, Texas. While in Texas, he became licensed to
practice as a CPA. After his professional work experience, Ron earned his PhD at the Univer-
sity of Florida. He has been honored for outstanding innovation in the classroom at Brigham
Young University. Ron has published academic research in the areas of taxpayer compliance
and professional tax judgment. He has also published legal research in a variety of areas. His
work has been published in journals such as Journal of the American Taxation Association,
The Journal of International Taxation, The Tax Executive, Tax Notes, The Journal of Accoun- Courtesy Ron Worsham
tancy, and Practical Tax Strategies.
TEACHING THE CODE IN CONTEXT

The bold innovative approach used by McGraw-Hill’s Taxation series is


quickly becoming the most popular choice of course materials among in-
structors and students. It’s apparent why the clear, organized, and engaging
delivery of content, paired with the most current and robust tax code u­ pdates,
has been adopted by more than 600 schools across the country.
McGraw-Hill’s Taxation is designed to provide
“Do you want the best tax text? This is the one to
a unique, innovative, and engaging learning ex-
use. It has a storyline in each chapter that can
perience for students studying taxation. The
­relate to real life issues.”
breadth of the topical coverage, the storyline
approach to presenting the material, the em- Leslie A. Mostow
phasis on the tax and nontax consequences of – University of Maryland, College Park
multiple parties involved in transactions, and
the integration of financial and tax accounting
topics make this book ideal for the modern tax
curriculum.

Since the first manuscript was written in 2005,


“This text provides broad coverage of important
449 professors have contributed 499 book re-
topics and does so in a manner that is easy for stu-
views, in addition to 29 focus groups and sym-
dents to understand. The material is very accessi-
ble for students.” posia. Throughout this preface, their comments
on the book’s organization, pedagogy, and
Kyle Post unique features are a testament to the market-
– Tarleton State University driven nature of Taxation’s development.

“I think this is the best book available for introductory and intermediate courses in taxation.”
Shane Stinson
– University of Alabama

vi
A MODERN APPROACH
FOR TODAY’S STUDENT
Spilker’s taxation series was built around the following five core precepts:

1
Storyline Approach: Each chapter begins with a storyline that introduces a set of characters or
a business entity facing specific tax-related situations. Each chapter’s examples are related to
the storyline, providing students with opportunities to learn the code in context.

2
Integrated Examples: In addition to providing examples in-context, we provide “What if”
scenarios within many examples to illustrate how variations in the facts might or might
not change the answers.

3
Conversational Writing Style: The authors took special care to write McGraw-Hill’s Taxation in
a way that fosters a friendly dialogue between the content and each individual student. The
tone of the presentation is intentionally conversational—creating the impression of speaking
with the student, as opposed to lecturing to the student.

4
Superior Organization of Related Topics: McGraw-Hill’s Taxation provides two alternative
topic sequences. In the McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities vol-
ume, the individual topics generally follow the tax form sequence, with an individual over-
view chapter and then chapters on income, deductions, investment-related issues, and the tax
liability computation. The topics then transition into business-related topics that apply to in-
dividuals. This volume then provides a group of specialty chapters dealing with topics of
particular interest to individuals (including students), including separate chapters on home
ownership, compensation, and retirement savings and deferred compensation. This volume
concludes with a chapter covering the taxation of business entities. Alternatively, in the Es-
sentials of Federal Taxation volume, the topics follow a more traditional sequence, with top-
ics streamlined (no specialty chapters) and presented in more of a life-cycle approach.

5
Real-World Focus: Students learn best when they see how concepts are applied in the real world.
For that reason, real-world examples and articles are included in “Taxes in the Real World”
boxes throughout the book. These vignettes demonstrate current issues in taxation and show
the relevance of tax issues in all areas of business.

The in-text examples of how to complete tax returns(is a strength of this text). These help students improve
their overall understanding of the material as it moves from something abstract to something tangible the
student can produce.”
Christine Cheng–Louisiana State University

vii
A STORYLINE APPROACH THAT
RESONATES WITH STUDENTS
Each chapter begins with a storyline that
introduces a set of characters facing spe-
Storyline Summary cific tax-related situations. This revolu-
Taxpayers: Courtney Wilson, age 40,
and Courtney’s mother Dorothy “Gram”
Weiss, age 70
tionary approach to teaching tax
Family
description:
Courtney is divorced with a son, Deron,
age 10, and a daughter, Ellen, age 20.
emphasizes real people facing real tax di-
Location:
Gram is currently residing with Courtney.

Kansas City, Missouri


lemmas. Students learn to apply practical
©Image Source Employment
status:
Courtney works as an architect for EWD.
Gram is retired. tax information to specific business and

C personal situations. As their situations


ourtney has already determined her Filing status: Courtney is head of household. Gram is
single.
taxable income. Now she’s working
on computing her tax liability. She
Current
situation:
Courtney and Gram have computed their
taxable income. Now they are trying to
determine their tax liability, tax refund,
evolve, the characters are brought further
knows she owes a significant amount of regu-
lar income tax on her employment and busi-
or additional taxes due and whether they
owe any payment-related penalties. to life.
ness activities. However, she’s not sure how to
compute the tax on the qualified dividends she re-
ceived from General Electric and is worried that she She’s planning on filing her tax return and paying
may be subject to the alternative minimum tax this her taxes on time.
year. Finally, Courtney knows she owes some self- Gram’s tax situation is much more straightforward.
employment taxes on her business income. Courtney She needs to determine the regular income tax on her
would like to determine whether she is eligible to taxable income. Her income is so low she knows she
claim any tax credits, such as the child tax credit for
her two children and education credits, because she
need not worry about the alternative minimum tax, and
she believes she doesn’t owe any self-employment tax.
“Excellent text! Very readable, easy for stu-
paid for a portion of her daughter Ellen’s tuition at Gram didn’t prepay any taxes this year, so she is con- dents to read and understand. Storyline ap-
the University of Missouri–Kansas City this year. cerned that she might be required to pay an underpay-
Courtney is hoping that she has paid enough in taxes ment penalty. She also expects to file her tax return and proach and integrated examples make it
during the year to avoid underpayment penalties. pay her taxes by the looming due date.
to be continued . . .
easy for students to relate to taxpayers and
their tax situations.”

Examples Sandra Owen


– Indianan State University, Bloomington
Examples are the cornerstone of
any textbook covering taxation.
For this reason, McGraw-Hill’s 8-1

Taxation authors took special care 2-4 CHAPTER 2 Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities

to create clear and helpful exam- The statute of limitations for IRS assessment can be extended in certain circumstances.
ples that relate to the storyline of
spi18394_ch08_000-051.indd 1 3/22/18 9:41 AM

For example, a six-year statute of limitations applies to IRS assessments if the taxpayer
omits items of gross income that exceed 25 percent of the gross income reported on the tax
the chapter. Students learn to refer return. For fraudulent returns, or if the taxpayer fails to file a tax return, the news is under-
standably worse. The statute of limitations remains open indefinitely in these cases.
to the facts presented in the story-
line and apply them to other Example 2-1

­scenarios—in this way, they build Bill and Mercedes file their 2014 federal tax return on September 6, 2015, after receiving an auto-
matic extension to file their return by October 15, 2015. In 2018, the IRS selects their 2014 tax return

a greater base of knowledge for audit. When does the statute of limitations end for Bill and Mercedes’s 2014 tax return?
Answer: Assuming the six-year and “unlimited” statute of limitation rules do not apply, the statute of

through application. Many exam- limitations ends on September 6, 2018 (three years after the later of the actual filing date and the origi-
nal due date).

ples also include “What if?” sce- What if: When would the statute of limitations end for Bill and Mercedes for their 2014 tax return if the
couple filed the return on March 22, 2015 (before the original due date of April 15, 2015)?

narios that add more complexity Answer: In this scenario the statute of limitations would end on April 15, 2018, because the later of
the actual filing date and the original due date is April 15, 2015.

to the example or explore related


tax concepts. Taxpayers should prepare for the possibility of an audit by retaining all supporting
documents (receipts, canceled checks, etc.) for a tax return until the statute of limitations
expires. After the statute of limitations expires, taxpayers can discard the majority of sup-
porting documents but should still keep a copy of the tax return itself, as well as any docu-
“The text is easy to read and pro- ments that may have ongoing significance, such as those establishing the taxpayer’s basis or
original investment in existing assets like personal residences and long-term investments.
vides many easy-to-follow exam-
ples throughout the chapter.” LO 2-2 IRS AUDIT SELECTION
Why me? This is a recurring question in life and definitely a common taxpayer question after
Gloria Jean Stuart receiving an IRS audit notice. The answer, in general, is that a taxpayer’s return is selected
for audit because the IRS has data suggesting the taxpayer’s tax return has a high probability
– Georgia Southern University of a significant understated tax liability. Budget constraints limit the IRS’s ability to audit a
majority or even a large minority of tax returns. Currently, fewer than 1 percent of all tax
returns are audited. Thus, the IRS must be strategic in selecting returns for audit in an effort
to promote the highest level of voluntary taxpayer compliance and increase tax revenues.
viii Specifically, how does the IRS select tax returns for audit? The IRS uses a number of
computer programs and outside data sources (newspapers, financial statement disclosures,
informants, and other public and private sources) to identify tax returns that may have an
understated tax liability. Common computer initiatives include the DIF (Discriminant Func-
tion) system, the document perfection program, and the information matching program.
The most important of these initiatives is the DIF system. The DIF system assigns a score to
each tax return that represents the probability the tax liability on the return has been underre-
THE PEDAGOGY YOUR STUDENTS NEED
TO PUT THE CODE IN CONTEXT CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Tax 1-3

TAXES IN THE REAL WORLD Tax Policy: Republicans versus Democrats


Taxes in the Real World
Oliver Wendell Holmes said “taxes are the price we of taxes. Democrats will claw back tax breaks for
Taxes in the Real World are short boxes used pay to live in a civilized society.” Both Democrats
and Republicans desire the same things: a civilized
companies that ship jobs overseas, eliminate tax
breaks for big oil and gas companies, and crack

throughout the book to demonstrate the real-world society and a healthy economy. However, neither
party can agree on what defines a civilized society
down on inversions and other methods com-
panies use to dodge their tax responsibilities . . .

use of tax concepts. Current articles on tax issues, or which path best leads to a healthy economy. The We will then use the revenue raised from fixing
U.S. national debt is $20 trillion dollars and growing,
the corporate tax code to reinvest in rebuilding

the real-world application of chapter-specific tax


yet the only thing we might agree on is that some- America and ensuring economic growth that will
thing has gone wrong. Regardless of which party or lead to millions of good-paying jobs.”
candidate you support, each party’s agenda will “We will ensure those at the top contribute
rules, and short vignettes on popular news about tax affect your income and taxes in various ways.
To explore the divide, let’s examine excerpts
to our country’s future by establishing a multi-
millionaire surtax to ensure millionaires and bil-

are some of the issues covered in Taxes in the Real from each party’s National Platform from our most
recent presidential election (2016).
lionaires pay their fair share. In addition, we will
shut down the “private tax system” for those at

World boxes. Republicans


the top, immediately close egregious loopholes
like those enjoyed by hedge fund managers,
“We are the party of a growing economy that restore fair taxation on multimillion dollar es-
gives everyone a chance in life, an opportunity to tates, and ensure millionaires can no longer
learn, work, and realize the prosperity freedom pay a lower rate than their secretaries. At a
makes possible.” time of near-record corporate profits, slow

“The Spilker text makes tax easy for students to under- “Government cannot create prosperity, wage growth, and rising costs, we need to offer
though government can limit or destroy it. Pros- tax relief to middle-class families—not those at

stand. It integrates great real-world examples so stu- perity is the product of self-discipline, enterprise, the top.”
saving and investment by individuals, but it is not “We will offer tax relief to hard working, middle-

dents can see how topics will be applied in practice. an end in itself. Prosperity provides the means by class families for the cost squeeze they have
which citizens and their families can maintain faced for years from rising health care, childcare,
their independence from government, raise CHAPTER 1
their education, AnandIntroduction
other expenses.” to Tax 1-5
https://www.
The integration of the tax form and exhibits of the tax children by their own values, practice their faith, democrats.org/party-platform#preamble
and build communities of cooperation and mu-
forms in the text are outstanding.”
HOW TO CALCULATE A TAX tual respect.” Conclusion
LO 1-3
“Republicans consider the establishment of a Each party fundamentally believes the govern-
pro-growth tax code a moral imperative. More ment should create/maintain cities and states that
– Kristen In
Bigbee, Texas
its simplest form,Tech University
the amount of tax equals the tax base multiplied by the tax rate: than any other public policy, the way government form a civilized society, and that government
raises revenue—how much, at what rates, under should foster a healthy economy. However, they
what circumstances, from whom, and for whom— choose very different paths to reach this objec-
Eq. 1-1 Tax = Tax Base × Tax Rate has the greatest impact on our economy’s perfor- tive. Democrats want to raise taxes on the
mance. It powerfully influences the level of wealthy and create government programs which
economic growth and job creation, which trans- cost more money, while Republicans wish to
The Key Facts The tax base defines what is actually taxed and is usually expressed in monetary lates into the level of opportunity for those who lower taxes and decrease government size and
THEareKEY pure; FACTS
terms, whereas the tax rate determines the level of taxes imposed on the tax base and is would otherwise be left behind.” spending. Both motives however, cur-

The Key Facts pro- usually expressed as a percentage. For example, a sales tax rate of 6 percent on a purchase
“A strong economy is one key to debt reduc- rent and cumulative deficits indicate that current
tion, but spending restraint is a necessary compo- revenue is insufficient How totoCalculate a Tax
meet government

vide quick synopses of $30 yields a tax of $1.80 ($1.80 = $30 × .06).
Federal, state, and local jurisdictions use a large variety of tax bases to collect tax.
nent that must be vigorously pursued.” https://www.
gop.com/platform/restoring-the-american-dream/
spending. Solving • Tax = Tax
these base ×willTax
problems
civil discourse, education and research/informa-
• realistic,
require
rate
tion in order to find The tax base defines what
of the critical pieces
effective solutions.
Some common tax bases (and related taxes) include taxable income (federal andRepublicans:
Democrats state https://www.gop.com/platform/restoring-the-
is actually taxed and is
usually expressed in
income taxes), purchases (sales tax), real estate “At a time of massive income and wealth in-
values (real estate tax), and personal
of information pre-
american-dream/
equality, we believe the wealthiest Americans monetary terms.
Democrats: https://www.democrats.org/party-platform#
property values (personal property tax). and largest corporations must pay their fair share preamble
• The tax rate determines
sented throughout Different portions of a tax base may be taxed at different rates. A single tax applied the level of taxes imposed
to an entire base constitutes a flat tax. In the case ofIngraduated affect the
taxes, manybase is ofdivided
each chapter. into a series of monetary amounts, or brackets, Developing
summary, taxes
and each asuccessive bracket
solid understanding
aspects
is taxed
of taxation
personal, business,
should at allow
a you ally
on the taxpolitical
and base anddecisions.
expressed
to make
is usu-
as a decisions
informed
2-7
different (gradually higher or gradually lower) percentage in these areas.rate. CHAPTER 2 Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities
Thus, Margaret can take comfort that her semester will likely prove useful to
percentage.
Calculating some taxes—income taxes forher personally. Who knows? Depending on her interest in business,
individuals or corporations, for exam- investment,
• Different portions ofretirement
a tax
Exhibits EXHIBIT 2-2
ple—can be quite complex. Advocates of
planning,
IRS Appeals/Litigation

flat taxes argue


and
Process the like, she may ultimately decide to pursue a career
base in
maytaxation.
be taxed at
IRS Exam that1b. the process should be
Today’s students are visual learners, and different rates.
1a. Agree with proposed Disagree with

simpler. But as we’ll see throughout the text, most of the difficulty
adjustment
in calculating a tax
proposed adjustment

rests in determining the tax base, not the tax rate. Indeed, there are only three basic tax
understands
McGraw-Hill’s Taxation rate this progressive,
structures (proportional,
Pay Taxes Due
and regressive), and each can be mastered
30-Day Letter

student need by making without


use ofmuch clear and
difficulty.

engaging charts, diagrams, and tabular spi18394_ch01_000-029.indd 3 3a. Agree with proposed
adjustment
2a. Request appeals

Appeals Conference
2b. No
taxpayer

demonstrations of key material.


DIFFERENT WAYS TO MEASURE TAX RATES
File Suit in U.S. District
3b. Disagree with proposed adjustment
response

File Claim for


Before we discuss the alternative tax rate
Claims structures,
refund claim let’s first define 4b. Pay taxthree different tax
5. IRS denies Court or U.S. Court of 90-Day Letter
Refund with the IRS
Federal

rates that will be useful in contrasting the different tax rate structures: the marginal, aver-
age, and effective tax rates.
“It is easily accessible to students as it is
The marginal tax rate is the tax rate that applies to the next additional increment
4a. Do not pay tax;
of
Petition Tax Court

written in easy-to-understand language,


a taxpayer’s taxable income (or deductions). Specifically, Tax Court

and contains sufficient examples to illus-


Marginal Tax Rate =
trate complicated tax concepts and IRS Exam: ©Imageroller/Alamy Stock Photo; Supreme Court: ©McGraw-Hill Education/Jill Braaten, photographer (also known as a statutory
ΔTax* (New Total Tax − Old Total Tax) notice of deficiency) explains that the taxpayer has 90 days to either (1) pay the proposed deficiency or (2) file a petition in the U.S. Tax

calculations.” Eq. 1-2 =


ΔTaxable Income (New Taxable Income − Old Taxable Income)
Court to hear the case.8 The U.S. Tax Court is a national court whose judges are tax experts who hear only tax cases. If the taxpayer
would like to litigate the case but prefers it to be heard in the local U.S. District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the taxpayer
must pay the tax deficiency first, then request a refund from the IRS, and then sue the IRS for refund in the court after the IRS denies the
refund claim.

Machiavelli Chao *Δ means change in. that is low on technical merit but high on emotional appeal, a jury trial in the local U.S.
District Court may be the best option.
– University of California, Irvine: The Paul What happens after the taxpayer’s case has been decided in a trial court? The process
where “old” refers to the current tax and “new” refers to the revised tax after incorporat-
may not be quite finished. After the trial court’s verdict, the losing party has the right to
request one of the 13 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals to hear the case. Exhibit 2-3 de-
Merage School of Business
ing the additional income (or deductions) in question. In graduated income tax systems,
picts the specific appellant courts for each lower-level court. Both the U.S. Tax Court and
local U.S. District Court cases are appealed to the specific U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
additional income (deductions) can push a taxpayer into a higher (lower) tax bracket, thus
based on the taxpayer’s residence.9 Cases litigated in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, for
example, appeal to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, whereas those
changing the marginal tax rate. tried in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas appeal to the 5th Circuit. In contrast, all U.S.
Court of Federal Claims cases appeal to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal

If the taxpayer lacks the funds to pay the assessed tax, there is legitimate doubt as to whether the taxpayer
Example 1-3
8

owes part or all of the assessed tax, or collection of the tax would cause the taxpayer economic hardship or
be unfair or inequitable, the taxpayer can request an offer in compromise with the IRS to settle the tax liabil-
ity for less than the full amount assessed by completing Form 656.
9
Decisions rendered by the U.S. Tax Court Small Claims Division cannot be appealed by the taxpayer or the IRS.
Margaret’s parents, Bill and Mercedes, file a joint tax return. They have $160,000 of taxable income ix
this year (after all tax deductions). Assuming the following federal tax rate schedule applies, how much
federal income tax will they owe this year?4
(continued on page 1-6)

spi18394_ch02_000-035.indd 7 2/2/18 10:45 AM


have a good likelihood of a favorable resolution at the appeals conference.
In this chapter we discussed several of the fundamentals of tax practice and proce-
dure: taxpayer filing requirements, the statute of limitations, the IRS audit process, the
primary tax authorities, tax research, tax professional standards, and taxpayer and tax
practitioner penalties. For the tax accountant, these fundamentals form the basis for much
of her work. Likewise, tax research forms the basis of much of a tax professional’s
compliance and planning services. Even for the accountant who doesn’t specialize in tax

PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT WITH A


accounting, gaining a basic understanding of tax practice and procedure is important.
Assisting clients with the IRS audit process is a valued service that accountants provide,
and clients expect all accountants to understand basic tax procedure issues and how to
research basic tax issues.

Summary Summary
LO 2-1 Identify the filing requirements for income tax returns and the statute of limitations for A unique feature of McGraw-Hill’s
assessment.
• All corporations must file a tax return annually regardless of their taxable income. Estates Taxation is the end-of-chapter sum-
and trusts are required to file annual income tax returns if their gross income exceeds
$600. The filing requirements for individual taxpayers depend on the taxpayer’s filing mary organized around learning ob-
status, age, and gross income.
• Individual and C corporation tax returns (except for C corporations with a June 30 year-end) jectives. Each objective has a brief,
are due on the fifteenth day of the fourth month following year-end. For C corporations with
a June 30 year-end, partnerships and S corporations, tax returns must be filed by the fifteenth bullet-point summary that covers
day of the third month following the entity’s fiscal year-end. Any taxpayer unable to file a tax
return by the original due date can request an extension to file. the major topics and concepts for
that chapter, including references to
• For both amended tax returns filed by a taxpayer and proposed tax assessments by the IRS,
the statute of limitations generally ends three years from the later of (1) the date the tax return
2-30 CHAPTER 2 Tax Compliance,
waschapter
the IRS, and
actually Tax
filed or
Tax Compliance,
(2) Authorities
the tax return’s original due date.
critical exhibits and examples. All
KEY TERMS
LO 2-2
2
happens after the audit. the IRS, and Tax
Outline the IRS audit process, how returns are selected, the different types of audits, and what
end-of-chapter material is tied to
Authorities
• The IRS uses a number of computer programs and outside data sources to identify tax
returns that may have an understated tax liability. Common computer initiatives include the learning objectives.
30-day letter (2-6) information
DIF (Discriminant matching
Function) program
system, the Statements
(2-4) program,
document perfection on Standards for
and the information Tax
matching program.
Internal Services (SSTS) (2-23)
90-day letter (2-6) • The three types ofRevenue Codeofof
IRS audits consist 1986 (2-11)office, and field
correspondence, examinations.
acquiescence (2-17) interpretative
• After the audit, the IRS willregulations (2-16)
send the taxpayer statute
a 30-day letter, which of limitations
provides the taxpayer (2-3)
the opportunity to pay the proposed assessment or request ansubstantial
appeals conference. If an
authority (2-24)
action on decision (2-17) legislative regulations (2-16)
agreement is not reached at appeals or the taxpayer does not pay the proposed assessment,
annotated tax service (2-18) nonacquiescence
Learning Objectives (2-17) tax treaties (2-14)
Circular 230 (2-24) office examination (2-6) technical advice memorandum (2-16)
Upon completing this chapter, you should be able to:

citator (2-21) primary authorities (2-9) temporary regulations (2-15)


LO 2-1 Identify the filing requirements for income tax returns and the statute of limitations for
civil penalties (2-26) private
assessment.letter rulings (2-16) topical tax service (2-19)
correspondence examination (2-5) LO 2-2procedural regulations
Outline the IRS audit are selected, the different U.S.
(2-16)
process, how returns types of Circuit
audits, and Courts of Appeals (2-7)
what happens after the audit.
criminal penalties (2-26)
spi18394_ch02_000-035.indd 28 proposed regulations (2-15) U.S. Constitution (2-11) 2/2/18 10:45 AM
LO 2-3 Evaluate the relative weights of the various tax law sources.
determination letters (2-16) question of fact (2-19) U.S. Court of Federal Claims (2-7)
LO 2-4 Describe the legislative process as it pertains to taxation.
DIF (Discriminant Function) question of law (2-19) U.S. District Court (2-7)
LO 2-5 Perform the basic steps in tax research.
system (2-4) regulations (2-15) U.S. Supreme Court (2-8)
LO 2-6 Describe tax professional responsibilities in providing tax advice.
document perfection program (2-4) revenue procedures (2-16) U.S. Tax Court (2-7)
LO 2-7 Identify taxpayer and tax professional penalties.
field examination (2-6) revenue rulings (2-16) writ of certiorari (2-8)
final regulations (2-15) secondary authorities (2-9)
Golsen rule (2-15) stare decisis (2-15)

Discussion
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS Questions
Discussion Questions are available in Connect®. Discussion questions,
LO 2-1 1. Name three factors that determine whether a taxpayer is required to file a tax
spi18394_ch02_000-035.indd 1 2/2/18 10:45 AM
now available in Con-
return.
LO 2-1 2. Benita is concerned that she will not be able to complete her tax return by April 15. nect, are provided for
Can she request an extension to file her return? By what date must she do so? each of the major con-
Assuming she requests an extension, what is the latest date that she could file her
return this year without penalty? cepts in each chapter,
LO 2-1 3. Agua Linda Inc. is a calendar-year corporation. What is the original due date for the providing students
corporate tax return? What happens if the original due date falls on a Saturday?
LO 2-2 4. Approximately what percentage of tax returns does the IRS audit? What are the
with an opportunity to
implications of this number for the IRS’s strategy in selecting returns for audit? review key parts of the
LO 2-2 5. Explain the difference between the DIF system and the National Research Program. chapter and answer
How do they relate to each other?
LO 2-2 6. Describe the differences between the three types of audits in terms of their scope evocative questions
and taxpayer type. about what they have
LO 2-2 7. Simon just received a 30-day letter from the IRS indicating a proposed assessment.
Does he have to pay the additional tax? What are his options? learned.
LO 2-2 8. Compare and contrast the three trial-level courts.
LO 2-3 9. Compare and contrast the three types of tax law sources and give examples of each.
LO 2-3 10. The U.S. Constitution is the highest tax authority but provides very little in the way
of tax laws. What are the next highest tax authorities beneath the U.S. Constitution?
LO 2-3 11. Jackie has just opened her copy of the Code for the first time. She looks at the table
of contents and wonders why it is organized the way it is. She questions whether it
makes sense to try and understand the Code’s organization. What are some reasons
why understanding the organization of the Internal Revenue Code may prove
useful?
x LO 2-3 12. Laura Li, a U.S. resident, worked for three months this summer in Hong Kong. What
type of tax authority may be especially useful in determining the tax consequences of
her foreign income?
tuition to go to the local firefighter’s school. I did this because someone told me
that I can deduct the tuition as an itemized deduction, so the money would be
coming back to me.
That should be all the information you need right now. Please calculate my
taxable income and complete pages 1 and 2 of Form 1040 (through taxable
income, line 43) and Schedule A. You’re still doing this for free, right?
2-32 CHAPTER 2 53.
Tax Jeremy
Compliance,and the Alyssa Johnson
IRS, and have been married for five years and do not have any
Tax Authorities
children. Jeremy was married previously and has one child from the prior marriage.
LO 2-7He
39. isWhat
self-employed
are the basic and differences
operates hisbetween own computercivil and repair store. For
criminal tax the first two
penalties?

WIDE VARIETY OF ASSIGNMENT MATERIAL LO 2-7 months


40. What of theare year,
someAlyssaof the worked
most common for Office Depot
civil as an employee.
penalties imposed on Intaxpayers?
March,
Alyssa accepted a new job with Super Toys Inc. (ST), where she worked for the
LO 2-7 41. What are the taxpayer’s standards to avoid the substantial understatement of tax
remainder of the year. This year, the Johnsons received $255,000 of gross income.
penalty?
Determine the Johnsons’ AGI given the following information:
LO 2-7 42.Expenses
a) What areassociatedthe tax practitioner’s
with Jeremy’sstandards to avoid
store include a penalty
$40,000 in salaryfor (and
recommending
employ- a tax
return
ment taxes)position?
to employees, $45,000 of supplies, and $18,000 in rent and other
administrative expenses.
Problems b) As a salesperson, Alyssa incurred $2,000 in travel expenses related to her
PROBLEMS
employment that were not reimbursed by her employer.
Problems are designed to test the c) The Johnsons
Select problemsown are aavailable
piece of in raw land held as an investment. They paid $500 of
Connect®.
real property taxes on the property and they incurred $200 of expenses in travel
comprehension of more complex LO 2-1 43.costs
Ahmed to seedoes the not
propertyhave andenough cash onother
to evaluate handsimilar
to paypotential
his taxes.investment
that he can request an extension to file his tax return. Does this solve his problem?
properties.
He was excited to hear

topics. Each problem at the end of LO 2-1


d) The Johnsons own a rental home. They incurred $8,500 of expensesApril
What
44.with
Molto
are
the property.
the ramifications if he doesn’t pay his tax liability
Stancha Corporation had zero earnings this fiscal year; in fact, it lost money.
by 15?
associated

the chapter is tied to one of that LO 2-1


Must paid
e) Jeremy
45.exchange).
the corporation
The estateAlyssa
$4,500 for health
of Monique
file a tax
was coveredChablis
return?coverage for himself (not through an
insurance
byearned
health $450
plans of provided
incomeby thisheryear.
employer, but required
Is the estate
chapter’s learning objectives, with 2-34 CHAPTER 2
LO 2-1
Jeremy
to
46.Jeremy
file
Jamarcus,
isannot
paid $2,500
eligible
income
Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities
f) a full-time
taxfor the plan until next year.
return?
in self-employment
student, earned taxes $2,500 ($1,250 represents
this year from a the employer
summer job. He had
multiple problems for critical topics. LO 2-5
portion
68. J. C. hasno
g) Jeremy
believesHis
other
been
of the
paid
the employer
incomeself-employment
a professional
$5,000
income iswithheld
in
year andtaxes).
this gambler
alimony and
will
for haveyears.
many
$3,000
zero federal
in
He loves
child support
income
this line
tax-free.$300 of federal income tax from his summer pay. Is Jamarcus
from
taxofliability
his
work and
prior mar-
this year.

research riage (divorced


required to in a2010).
file tax return? Should Jamarcus file a tax return?
a) Use an available tax research service to determine whether J. C.’s thinking is cor-
h)
47.The Johnsons
Shane has never donated filed$2,000
a tax to their favoriteearning
return charity. excessive sums of money as a
LO 2-1 rect. Is the answer to this question founddespite
in the Internal Revenue Code? If not,
Tax Forms Problems 54. what
Shaunagambler.
type
has
Coleman
not
When
of authority
filed
does
is single.
a tax
the
Shestatute
answers
return?
this
is of limitations
question?
employed expire for designer
as an architectural the yearsfor in Stream-
which Shane
line Design (SD). Shauna wanted thetoresults
determine her research.
taxable income for this year. She
Tax forms problems are a set of require-
tax forms b) Write a memo communicating of your
LO 2-1 48. Latoya
correctly filed herher
calculated taxAGI.
return on February
However, 10 this
she wasn’t sureyear.
howWhen will the
to compute thestatute
rest ofof
LO 2-5 69. Katie
herrecently
limitations
taxable won
income. a ceramic
expireShefor dalmatian
this taxthe
provided valued at $800
return?
following on a television
information with hopes gamethatshow.
you
ments included in the end-of-chapter Shecould
research LO 2-1 show.
questions
use it whether
to determinethis prize
her is taxable
taxable since it was a “gift” she won on the
income.
49. Using the facts from the previous problem, how would your answer change if
a) Shauna
Latoya paid $4,680 for
understated hermedical
incomeexpenses for care from
by 40 percent? How awould brokenyour ankle. Also, change if
answer
material of the 2019 edition. These a) Use Shauna’s
b) Write
an available
Latoya
a letteroffice
doctor’s
received to
tax research
boyfriend,
intentionally
Katie
from so
her
Blake, service
failed
communicating
sheclients?
drove to
to report
could receivethe
answer
Shauna
care
as (in Katie’s
her car)
taxable
results
for her
question.
a totalany
income
ofbroken
your research.
ankle.
of 115
cashmiles to the she
payments

problems require students to complete a 2-2 Pierre recently received a tax penalty for failing to file a tax return. He was upset (not
LO 2-5 LO70. b)
50. Shauna
Paula
receivethrough
justpenalty,
the
paid
could a total
not
an exchange).
received
of
reach
he wasSD
a 90-day
but
$3,400
an
did not
letter.
comforted
in
agreement health
If she
insurance
with
reimburse
bywants
the
toany
the thought
IRSpremiums
at
ofthat
litigate
her
thistheexpense.
he
during
appeals
issue
the
Besides
but
will get adoes
year
conference
not
tax de-
to and has
the have
tax form (or part of a tax form), provid- research duction sufficient
51. an
LO 2-2 a) Use
for payingcash
In available
choosing tax
to pay the proposed deficiency, what is her best court choice?
the penalty.
a trial-level court, how
research service should a court’s
to determine if Pierreprevious
is correct. rulings influence the
ing students with valuable experience and practice with filling out these forms. These requirements— b) Writechoice?
a memoHow
level court?
should circuit
communicating thecourtresultsrulings
of your influence
research. the taxpayer’s choice of a trial-
71. Paris was happy to provide a contribution to her friend Nicole’s campaign for
and their relevant forms—are also included in Connect. Each tax form problem includes an icon to
LO 2-5
LO 2-2 52. Sophia recently won a tax case litigated in the 7th Circuit. She has just heard that
mayor, especially after she learned that charitable contributions are tax
research the Supreme Court denied the writ of certiorari. Should she be happy or not, and
deductible.
differentiate it from regular problems. spi18394_ch06_000-043.indd 40
LO 2-2
why?
a) Use an available tax service to determine whether Paris can deduct this
53. Campbell’s tax return was audited because she failed to report interest she earned
3/8/18 1:49 PM

contribution.
on her tax return. What IRS audit selection method identified her tax return?
b) Write a memo communicating the results of your research.
54. Yong’s tax return was audited because he calculated his tax liability incorrectly.
Research Problems
LO 2-2
LO 2-5 72. Matt andWhat LoriIRS wereaudit divorced in 2016.
procedure Pursuant
identified histotax
thereturn
divorce fordecree
audit?Matt receives
$10,000 of alimony
55. Randy deducted each amonth. Use an
high level of available
itemized tax service totwo
deductions determine
years ago if the
relative to his
Research problems are special
LO 2-2
research alimonyincome
Matt receives is taxable. Would your answer change if Matt and Lori still
level. He recently received an IRS notice requesting documentation for his
live together?
itemized deductions. What audit procedure likely identified his tax return for
problems throughout the end- 73. Shaun isaudit?
a huge college football fan. In the past, he has always bought football
LO 2-5
tickets
56. on the street
Jackie has a from ticketclient
corporate scalpers. Thisrecently
that has year, hereceived
decided ato30-day
join the univer-
notice from the IRS
of-chapter assignment mate-
LO 2-2
research sity’s ticket
with program,
a $100,000which requires a $2,000
tax assessment. contribution
Her client to the requesting
is considering university for
an appeals
planning
the “right” to purchase
conference tickets.the
to contest Shaun will then
assessment. pay factors
What $400 per season
should ticket.
Jackie Shaun
advise her client to
rial. These require students to understands that before
consider the price paid for an
requesting theappeals
season conference?
tickets is not tax deductible as a
charitable contribution. However, contributions to a university are typically tax
do both basic and more complex research on topics outside deductible.
of the scope of the book. Each research
a) Use an available tax service to determine how much, if any, of Shaun’s $2,000
problem includes an icon to differentiate it from regular problems.
contribution for the right to purchase tickets is tax deductible.
b) Write a letter to Shaun communicating the results of your research.
LO 2-5 74. Latrell recently used his Delta Skymiles to purchase
CHAPTER 2 a freethe
Tax Compliance, round-trip
IRS, and Taxticket to
Authorities 2-33

Planning Problems 57. The IRS recently


research
Milan, Italy (value $1,200). The frequent flyer miles used to purchase the ticket
completed an audit
from of
spi18394_ch02_000-035.indd 32
were generated Shea’s tax
Latrell’s return travel
business and assessed
as a CPA.
additional tax. Shea requested an appeals conference but was unable to settle the
$15,000
Latrell’s employer paid for LO 2-2 2/2/18 10:45 AM

Planning problems are another unique


his business trips, and he was not taxed on the travel reimbursement. planning
case at the conference. She is contemplating which trial court to choose to hear
her case. Providea) aUse an available tax
recommendation research
based on the service
following toalternative
determinefacts:how much income, if any,
a) Shea resides in Latrell
the 2nd will have tothe
recognize as ahas
result of purchasing anthe
airline ticket with
set of problems included in the end-of- position Shea isSkymiles
Circuit, and 2nd Circuit
litigating. earned from business travel.
recently ruled against

b) The Federal b) Write a memo communicating


has recentlythe results of your research.
chapter assignment material. These re-
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Shea’s
position.
75. Benjamin, a self-employed bookkeeper, takes a CPA review course ($1,500 cost) to
LO 2-5
c) The issue being litigated involves a question of fact. Shea has a very appealing
quire students to test their tax planning help prepare for the CPA exam.
d) The issue being litigated
4-40

is highly
CHAPTER 4

research
technical, andservice
Individual Income Tax Overview, Dependents, and Filing Status
story to tell but little favorable case law to support her position.
research a) Use an available tax to determine
Shea believes stronglyifinBenjamin
her may deduct the
separate status.exam
By changing
course. his filing status, Doug sought a refund for an overpay-
skills after covering the chapter topics. Each planning
e) Shea is a local
problem
interpretation ofcost
b) elected
Write
of
a
for the tax yearincludes
law.the
thement
memo
CPA
official
2018 (he paid more tax
communicating
and would prefer tothe results
minimize
an
of
any youricon
in the
local research.
publicity
to
original joint differentiate
return than he
owed on a separate return). Is Doug allowed to change his filing status for the 2018
it
from regular problems. regarding the case. tax year and receive a tax refund with his amended return?
58. Juanita, a Texas resident (5th Circuit), is researching a tax question and finds a 5th LO 2-3
Circuit case ruling that is favorable and a 9th Circuit case that is unfavorable. Which
circuit case has more “authoritative weight” and why? How would your answer

Comprehensive and Tax Return 59.


change if Juanita were a Kentucky resident (6th Circuit)?
COMPREHENSIVE PROBLEMS
Faith, a resident of Florida (11th Circuit), recently found a circuit court case that is LO 2-3
favorable to her research question. are
Which two circuits would she prefer to have
Problems
Select problems available in Connect®.
issued the opinion?
spi18394_ch02_000-035.indd 34 54. Marc and Michelle are married and earned salaries this year of $64,000 and 2/2/18 10:45 AM
60. Robert has found a “favorable” authority directly on point
to for
theirhissalaries,
tax question. If the interest
LO 2-3

Comprehensive and tax return problems tax forms


Which court would hean
$12,000, respectively.
authority is a court case,
fromwhich
least
court would
municipal bonds he
prefer toretirement
individual
In addition
andprefer
have issued
$500 to havecorporate
from
the opinion?
account,
issued the
they received
opinion?
bonds.
of $350
Marc contributed $2,500 to
and Marc paid alimony to a prior spouse in the
address multiple concepts in a single 61. Jamareo has found a “favorable”
the authority is an administrative
authority directly
authority, which
with them throughout
on point
specific
the entire
for
year.type
Thus,
his tax
ofMarc
question.
authority
If
amount of $1,500. Marc and Michelle have a 10-year-old son, Matthew, who lived LO 2-3
would are allowed to claim
and Michelle

problem. Comprehensive problems are


he prefer to answer hisa question?
$2,000 childWhich administrative
tax credit authority
for Matthew. Marcwould he least paid $6,000 of
and Michelle
prefer to answer his question?
expenditures that qualify as itemized deductions and they had a total of $5,500 in
62. For each of the following citations,
federal incomeidentify the type from
taxes withheld of authority (statutory,during
their paychecks admin- the course of the year.
ideal for cumulative topics; for this rea-
LO 2-3
istrative, or judicial) and explain
a) What is the
Marccitation.
and Michelle’s gross income?
a) Reg. Sec. 1.111-1(b) b) What is Marc and Michelle’s adjusted gross income?
son, they are located at the end of all b) IRC Sec. 469(c)(7)(B)(i)
c) What is the total amount of Marc and Michelle’s deductions from AGI?
c) Rev. Rul. 82-204, 1982-2
d) What C.B. 192 and Michelle’s taxable income?
is Marc
chapters. In the end-of-book Appendix C, we include tax return problems that cover multiple chap- d) Amdahl Corp., 108e)TCWhat
e) PLR 9727004
507 is
(1997)
Marc and Michelle’s taxes payable or refund due for the year? (Use the
tax rate schedules.)

ters. Additional tax return problems are also63. available in Connect and Instructor Resource Cen-f) Hills v. Comm., 50 f) AFTR2d
Complete
For each of the followingrecent
82-6070 (11th
the first
formidentify
citations,
twoCir.,
available).
pages1982)
of Marc and Michelle’s Form 1040 (use the most
the type of authority (statutory, admin- LO 2-3

ter. These problems range from simple to complex and cover individual taxation, corporate istrative, or judicial)
a) IRC
taxSec.
forms
55. and
280A(c)(5)
explainand
Demarco theJanine
citation.
Jackson have been married for 20 years and have four children
who qualify as their dependents (Damarcus, Janine, Michael, and Candice). The
b) Rev. Proc. 2004-34,couple
2004-1received
C.B. 911 salary income of $100,000, qualified business income of $10,000
taxation, partnership taxation, and S corporation taxation. c) Lakewood Associates, fromRIAan investment in a partnership, and they sold their home this year. They ini-
TC Memo 95-3566
d) TAM 200427004 tially purchased the home three years ago for $200,000 and they sold it for
e) U.S. v. Muncy, 2008-2 $250,000.
USTC Thepar. gain on (E.D.,
50,449 the sale qualified
AR, 2008) for the exclusion from the sale of a princi-
64. pal residence.
Justine would like to clarify The Jacksons
her understanding of aincurred $16,500
code section of itemized
recently enacteddeductions,
by and they had
LO 2-4
Congress. What tax law $3,550 withheld
sources from their
are available paychecks
to assist Justine?for federal taxes. They are also allowed to
65.
claim a child tax credit for each of their children. However, because Candice is 18
Aldina has identified conflicting authorities that address her research question. How LO 2-5
xi
years of age, the Jacksons may claim a child tax credit for other qualifying depen-
should she evaluate these authorities to make a conclusion?
dents for Candice.
66. Georgette has identified a 1983 court case that appears to answer her research ques- LO 2-5
a) What is the Jacksons’ taxable income, and what is their tax liability or (refund)?
tion. What must she do to determine if the case still represents “current” law?
b) Complete the first two pages of the Jacksons’ Form 1040 (use the most recent
67. Sandy has determined that her research question depends upon the interpretation of LO 2-5
form available).
the phrase “not compensated by insurance.” What type of research question is this?
c) What would their taxable income be if their itemized deductions totaled $28,000
instead of $16,500?
McGraw-Hill Connect® is a highly reliable, easy-to-
use homework and learning management solution
that utilizes learning science and award-winning
adaptive tools to improve student results.

Homework and Adaptive Learning

▪ Connect’s assignments help students


contextualize what they’ve learned through
application, so they can better understand the
material and think critically.
▪ Connect will create a personalized study path
customized to individual student needs through
SmartBook®.
▪ SmartBook helps students study more efficiently
by delivering an interactive reading experience
through adaptive highlighting and review.

Over 7 billion questions have been


answered, making McGraw-Hill Using Connect improves retention rates
by 19.8 percentage points, passing rates
Education products more intelligent, by 12.7 percentage points, and exam
reliable, and precise. scores by 9.1 percentage points.

73% of instructors
who use Connect
Quality Content and Learning Resources require it; instructor
satisfaction increases
by 28% when Connect
▪ Connect content is authored by the world’s best subject is required.
matter experts, and is available to your class through a
simple and intuitive interface.
▪ The Connect eBook makes it easy for students to
access their reading material on smartphones
and tablets. They can study on the go and don’t
need internet access to use the eBook as a
reference, with full functionality.
▪ Multimedia content such as videos, simulations,
and games drive student engagement and critical
thinking skills. ©McGraw-Hill Education
Robust Analytics and Reporting

▪ Connect Insight® generates easy-to-read


reports on individual students, the class as a
whole, and on specific assignments.
▪ The Connect Insight dashboard delivers data
on performance, study behavior, and effort.
Instructors can quickly identify students who ©Hero Images/Getty Images

struggle and focus on material that the class


has yet to master.
▪ Connect automatically grades assignments
and quizzes, providing easy-to-read reports
on individual and class performance.

More students earn


As and Bs when they
use Connect.

Trusted Service and Support

▪ Connect integrates with your LMS to provide single sign-on and automatic syncing
of grades. Integration with Blackboard®, D2L®, and Canvas also provides automatic
syncing of the course calendar and assignment-level linking.
▪ Connect offers comprehensive service, support, and training throughout every
phase of your implementation.
▪ If you’re looking for some guidance on how to use Connect, or want to learn
tips and tricks from super users, you can find tutorials as you work. Our Digital
Faculty Consultants and Student Ambassadors offer insight into how to achieve
the results you want with Connect.

www.mheducation.com/connect
DIGITAL LEARNING ASSETS TO IMPROVE
STUDENT OUTCOMES
“The quality of the online materials in Connect and Learnsmart are market-leading and unmatched
in the tax arena.”
Jason W. Stanfield
– Ball State University

Connect helps students learn more effi-


ciently by providing feedback and practice
material when they need it, where they
need it. Connect grades homework auto-
matically and gives immediate feedback
on any questions students may have
missed. The extensive assignable, gradable
end-of-chapter content includes problems,
comprehensive problems (available as
auto-graded tax forms), and discussion
questions. Also, select questions have been
redesigned to test students’ knowledge
more fully. They now include tables for
students to work through rather than requiring that all calculations be done offline.

Auto-Graded Tax Forms


The auto-graded Tax Forms in Connect provide a much-improved student experience when solving
the tax-form based problems. The tax form simulation allows students to apply tax concepts by
­completing the actual tax forms online with automatic feedback and grading for both students and
instructors.

xiv
Guided Examples
The Guided Examples, or “hint”
videos, in Connect provide a nar-
rated, animated, step-by-step
walk-through of select problems
similar to those assigned. These
short presentations can be turned
on or off by instructors and pro-
vide reinforcement when students
need it most.
TaxACT®
M c G r a w - H i l l ’s
Taxation can be
packaged with tax software from
TaxACT, one of the leading prep-
aration software companies in the
market today. The 2017 edition in-
cludes availability of both Individuals and Business Entities software, including the 1040 Forms and
TaxACT Preparer’s Business 3-Pack (with Forms 1065, 1120, and 1120S).
Please note, TaxACT is only compatible with PCs and not Macs. However, we offer easy-to-complete
licensing agreement templates that are accessible within Connect and the Instructor Resources Center to
enable school computer labs to download the software onto campus hardware for free.
Roger’s CPA
McGraw-Hill Education has partnered with Roger CPA Review, a
global leader in CPA Exam preparation, to provide students a smooth
transition from the accounting classroom to successful completion of the CPA Exam. While many
aspiring accountants wait until they have completed their academic studies to begin preparing for the
CPA Exam, research shows that those who become familiar with exam content earlier in the process
have a stronger chance of successfully passing the CPA Exam.
Accordingly, students using these McGraw-Hill materials will have access to sample CPA Exam
multiple-choice questions and Task-based Simulations from Roger CPA Review, with expert-written
explanations and solutions. All questions are either directly from the AICPA or are modeled on
AICPA questions that appear in the exam. Task-based Simulations are delivered via the Roger CPA
Review platform, which mirrors the look, feel, and functionality of the actual exam.
McGraw-Hill Education and Roger CPA Review are dedicated to supporting every accounting
student along their journey, ultimately helping them achieve career success in the accounting profes-
sion. For more information about the full Roger CPA Review program, exam requirements, and exam
content, visit www.rogercpareview.com.
McGraw-Hill Customer Experience Group Contact Information
At McGraw-Hill, we understand that getting the most from new technology can be challenging.
That’s why our services don’t stop after you purchase our products. You can contact our Product
Specialists 24 hours a day to get product training online. Or you can search the knowledge bank of
Frequently Asked Questions on our support website. For Customer Support, call 800-331-5094, or
visit www.mhhe.com/support. One of our Technical Support Analysts will be able to assist you in a
timely fashion.

xv
Four Volumes to Fit

McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of Individuals is organized to empha- McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of Business Entities begins with the
size topics that are most important to undergraduates taking their process for determining gross income and deductions for busi-
first tax course. The first three chapters provide an introduction nesses, and the tax consequences associated with purchasing as-
to taxation and then carefully guide students through tax re- sets and property dispositions (sales, trades, or other
search and tax planning. Part II discusses the fundamental ele- dispositions). Part II provides a comprehensive overview of enti-
ments of individual income tax, starting with the tax formula in ties and the formation, reorganization, and liquidation of corpo-
Chapter 4 and then proceeding to more discussion on income, rations. Unique to this series is a complete chapter on accounting
deductions, investments, and computing tax liabilities in Chap- for income taxes, which provides a primer on the basics of calcu-
ters 5–8. Part III then discusses tax issues associated with busi- lating the income tax provision. Included in the narrative is a
ness-related activities. Specifically, this part addresses business discussion of temporary and permanent differences and their im-
income and deductions, accounting methods, and tax conse- pact on a company’s book “effective tax rate.” Part III provides a
quences associated with purchasing assets and property disposi- detailed discussion of partnerships and S corporations. The last
tions (sales, trades, or other dispositions). Part IV is unique part of the book covers state and local taxation, multinational
among tax textbooks; this section combines related tax issues for taxation, and transfer taxes and wealth planning.
compensation, retirement savings, and home ownership. Part I: Business-Related Transactions
Part I: Introduction to Taxation 1. Business Income, Deductions, and Accounting Methods
1. An Introduction to Tax 2. Property Acquisition and Cost Recovery
2. Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities 3. Property Dispositions
3. Tax Planning Strategies and Related Limitations Part II: Entity Overview and Taxation of C Corporations
Part II: Basic Individual Taxation 4. Entities Overview
4. Individual Income Tax Overview, Dependents, and 5. Corporate Operations
Filing Status 6. Accounting for Income Taxes
5. Gross Income and Exclusions 7. Corporate Taxation: Nonliquidating Distributions
6. Individual Deductions 8. Corporate Formation, Reorganization, and Liquidation
7. Investments Part III: Taxation of Flow-Through Entities
8. Individual Income Tax Computation and Tax Credits 9. Forming and Operating Partnerships
Part III: Business-Related Transactions 10. Dispositions of Partnership Interests and Partnership
9. Business Income, Deductions, and Accounting Methods Distributions
10. Property Acquisition and Cost Recovery 11. S Corporations
11. Property Dispositions Part IV: Multijurisdictional Taxation and Transfer Taxes
Part IV: Specialized Topics 12. State and Local Taxes
12. Compensation 13. The U.S. Taxation of Multinational Transactions
13. Retirement Savings and Deferred Compensation 14. Transfer Taxes and Wealth Planning
14. Tax Consequences of Home Ownership

xvi
Four Course Approaches

McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of Individuals and McGraw-Hill’s Essentials of Federal Taxation is designed for a
Business Entities covers all chapters included one-semester course, covering the basics of taxation of individu-
in the two split volumes in one convenient als and business entities. To facilitate a one-semester course,
volume. See Table of Contents. McGraw-Hill’s Essentials of Federal Taxation folds the key top-
ics from the investments, compensation, retirement savings, and
Part I: Introduction to Taxation home ownership chapters in Taxation of Individuals into three
1. An Introduction to Tax individual taxation chapters that discuss gross income and exclu-
2. Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities sions, for AGI deductions, and from AGI deductions, respec-
3. Tax Planning Strategies and Related Limitations tively. The essentials volume also includes a two-chapter
Part II: Basic Individual Taxation C corporation sequence that uses a life-cycle approach covering
4. Individual Income Tax Overview, Dependents, and corporate formations and then corporate operations in the first
Filing Status chapter and nonliquidating and liquidating corporate distribu-
5. Gross Income and Exclusions tions in the second chapter. This volume is perfect for those
6. Individual Deductions teaching a one-semester course and for those who struggle to get
7. Investments through the 25-chapter comprehensive volume.
8. Individual Income Tax Computation and Tax Credits Part I: Introduction to Taxation
Part III: Business-Related Transactions 1. An Introduction to Tax
9. Business Income, Deductions, and Accounting Methods 2. Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities
10. Property Acquisition and Cost Recovery 3. Tax Planning Strategies and Related Limitations
11. Property Dispositions Part II: Individual Taxation
Part IV: Specialized Topics 4. Individual Income Tax Overview, Dependents, and
12. Compensation Filing Status
13. Retirement Savings and Deferred Compensation 5. Gross Income and Exclusions
14. Tax Consequences of Home Ownership 6. Individual For AGI Deductions
Part V: Entity Overview and Taxation of C Corporations 7. Individual From AGI Deductions
15. Entities Overview 8. Individual Income Tax Computation and Tax Credits
16. Corporate Operations Part III: Business-Related Transactions
17. Accounting for Income Taxes 9. Business Income, Deductions, and Accounting Methods
18. Corporate Taxation: Nonliquidating Distributions 10. Property Acquisition and Cost Recovery
19. Corporate Formation, Reorganization, and Liquidation 11. Property Dispositions
Part VI: Taxation of Flow-Through Entities Part IV: Entity Overview and Taxation of C Corporations
20. Forming and Operating Partnerships 12. Entities Overview
21. Dispositions of Partnership Interests and Partnership 13. Corporate Formations and Operations
Distributions 14. Corporate Nonliquidating and Liquidating Distributions
22. S Corporations Part V: Taxation of Flow-Through Entities
Part VII: Multijurisdictional Taxation and Transfer Taxes 15. Forming and Operating Partnerships
23. State and Local Taxes 16. Dispositions of Partnership Interests and Partnership
24. The U.S. Taxation of Multinational Transactions Distributions
25. Transfer Taxes and Wealth Planning 17. S Corporations

xvii
SUPPLEMENTS FOR INSTRUCTORS
Assurance of Learning Ready The statements contained in McGraw-Hill’s
Many educational institutions today are focused Taxation are provided only as a guide for the
on the notion of assurance of learning, an im- users of this textbook. The AACSB leaves con-
portant element of many accreditation stan- tent coverage and assessment within the pur-
dards. McGraw-Hill’s Taxation is designed view of individual schools, the mission of the
specifically to support your assurance of learn- school, and the faculty. While McGraw-Hill’s
ing initiatives with a simple, yet powerful, Taxation and the teaching package make no
solution. claim of any specific AACSB qualification or
Each chapter in the book begins with a list evaluation, we have, within the text and test
of numbered learning objectives, which appear bank, labeled selected questions according to
throughout the chapter as well as in the end-of- the eight general knowledge and skill areas.
chapter assignments. Every test bank question
for McGraw-Hill’s Taxation maps to a specific TestGen
chapter learning objective in the textbook. Each TestGen is a complete, state-of-the-art test gen-
test bank question also identifies topic area, erator and editing application software that al-
level of difficulty, Bloom’s Taxonomy level, lows instructors to quickly and easily select test
and AICPA and AACSB skill area. items from McGraw Hill’s TestGen testbank
content and to organize, edit, and customize the
AACSB Statement questions and answers to rapidly generate paper
McGraw-Hill Education is a proud corporate tests. Questions can include stylized text, sym-
member of AACSB International. Understand- bols, graphics, and equations that are inserted
ing the importance and value of AACSB ac- directly into questions using built-in mathemat-
creditation, McGraw-Hill’s Taxation recognizes ical templates. With both quick-and-simple test
the curricula guidelines detailed in the AACSB creation and flexible and robust editing tools,
standards for business accreditation by connect- TestGen is a test generator system for today’s
ing selected questions in the text and the test educators.
bank to the general knowledge and skill guide-
lines in the revised AACSB standards.

A HEARTFELT THANKS TO THE MANY COLLEAGUES WHO SHAPED THIS BOOK


The version of the book you are reading would not be the same book without the valuable suggestions, keen insights,
and constructive criticisms of the list of reviewers below. Each professor listed here contributed in substantive ways
to the organization of chapters, coverage of topics, and use of pedagogy. We are grateful to them for taking the
time to read chapters or attend reviewer conferences, focus groups, and symposia in support of the development
for the book:
Previous Edition Reviewers Cynthia Bird, Tidewater Community College
Donna Abelli, Mount Ida College Lisa Blum, University of Louisville
Joseph Assalone, Rowan College at Gloucester County Rick Blumenfeld, Sierra College
Valeriya Avdeev, William Paterson University Cindy Bortman Boggess, Babson College
Robyn Barrett, St. Louis Community College Cathalene Bowler, University of Northern Iowa
Kevin Baugess, ICDC College Justin Breidenbach, Ohio Wesleyan University
Christopher Becker, Coastal Carolina University Suzon Bridges, Houston Community College
Jeanne Bedell, Keiser University Stephen Bukowy, UNC Pembroke
Marcia Behrens, Nichols College Esther Bunn, Stephen F. Austin State University
Michael Belleman, St. Clair County Community College Holly Caldwell, Bridgewater College
David Berman, Community College of Philadelphia James Campbell, Thomas College
Tim Biggart, Berry College Alisa Carini, UCSD Extension

xviii
Ronald Carter, Patrick Henry Community College Helen Hurwitz, Saint Louis University
Cynthia Caruso, Endicott College Rik Ichiho, Dixie State University
Paul Caselton, University of Illinois Springfield Kerry Inger, Auburn University
Amy Chataginer, Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College Paul Johnson, Mississippi Gulf Coast CC–JD Campus
Machiavelli Chao, University of California, Irvine Athena Jones, University of Maryland University College
Max Chao, University of California, Irvine Andrew Junikiewicz, Temple University
Christine Cheng, Louisiana State University Susan Jurney, University of Arkansas Fayetteville
Lisa Church, Rhode Island College Sandra Kemper, Regis University
Marilyn Ciolino, Delgado Community College Jon Kerr, Baruch College–CUNY
Wayne Clark, Southwest Baptist University Lara Kessler, Grand Valley State University
Ann Cohen, University at Buffalo, SUNY Janice Klimek, University of Central Missouri
Sharon Cox, University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign Pamela Knight, Columbus Technical College
Terry Crain, University of Oklahoma–Norman Satoshi Kojima, East Los Angeles College
Roger Crane, Indiana University East Dawn Konicek, Idaho State University
Brad Cripe, Northern Illinois University Jack Lachman, Brooklyn College
Curtis J. Crocker, Southern Crescent Technical College Brandon Lanciloti, Freed-Hardeman University
Richard Cummings, University of Wisconsin–Whitewater Stacie Laplante, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joshua Cutler, University of Houston Suzanne Laudadio, Durham Tech
William Dams, Lenoir Community College Stephanie Lewis, Ohio State University–Columbus
Nichole Dauenhauer, Lakeland Community College Troy Lewis, Brigham Young University
Susan Snow Davis, Green River College Teresa Lightner, University of North Texas
Jim Desimpelare, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor Robert Lin, California State University–East Bay
Julie Dilling, Moraine Park Technical College Chris Loiselle, Cornerstone University
Steve Dombrock, Carroll University Bruce Lubich, Penn State–Harrisburg
Dr. Vicky C. Dominguez, College of Southern Nevada Narelle Mackenzie, San Diego State University, National University
Michael P. Donohoe, University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign Michael Malmfeldt, Shenandoah University
John Dorocak, California State University–San Berdinado Kate Mantzke, Northern Illinois University
Amy Dunbar, University of Connecticut–Storrs Robert Martin, Kennesaw State University
John Eagan, Morehouse College Anthony Masino, East Tennessee State University
Reed Easton, Seton Hall University Paul Mason, Baylor University
Elizabeth Ekmekjian, William Paterson University Lisa McKinney, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ann Esarco, Columbia College Columbia Allison McLeod, University of North Texas
Frank Faber, St. Joseph’s College Lois McWhorter, Somerset Community College
Michael Fagan, Raritan Valley Community College Janet Meade, University of Houston
Frank Farina, Catawba College Michele Meckfessel, University of Missouri–St. Louis
Andrew Finley, Claremont McKenna Frank Messina, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Tim Fogarty, Case Western Reserve University R Miedaner, Lee University
Mimi Ford, Middle Georgia State University Ken Milani, University of Notre Dame
Wilhelmina Ford, Middle Georgia State University Karen Morris, Northeast Iowa Community College
George Frankel, San Francisco State University Stephanie Morris, Mercer University
Lawrence Friedken, Penn State University Michelle Moshier, University at Albany
Stephen Gara, Drake University Leslie Mostow, University of Maryland, College Park
Robert Gary, University of New Mexico James Motter, Indiana University-Purdue University
Greg Geisler, University of Missouri–St. Louis ­Indianapolis
Earl Godfrey, Gardner Webb University Jackie Myers, Sinclair Community College
Thomas Godwin, Purdue University Michael Nee, Cape Cod Community College
David Golub, Northeastern University Liz Ott, Casper College
Marina Grau, Houston Community College Sandra Owen- Indiana State University–Bloomington
Brian Greenstein, University of Delaware Edwin Pagan, Passaic County Community College
Patrick Griffin, Lewis University Jeff Paterson, Florida State University
Lillian Grose, University of Holy Cross Ronald Pearson, Bay College
Rosie Hagen, Virginia Western Community College Martina Peng, Franklin University
Marcye Hampton, University of Central Florida James Pierson, Franklin University
Cass Hausserman, Portland State University Sonja Pippin, University of Nevada–Reno
Rebecca Helms, Ivy Tech Community College Anthony Pochesci, Rutgers University
Melanie Hicks, Liberty University Kyle Post, Tarleton State University
Mary Ann Hofmann, Appalachian State University Christopher Proschko, Texas State University
Robert Joseph Holdren, Muskingum University Joshua Racca, University of Alabama
Bambi Hora, University of Central Oklahoma Francisco Rangel, Riverside City College
Carol Hughes, Asheville Buncombe Technical Community College Pauline Ash Ray, Thomas University

xix
Luke Richardson, University of South Florida Terrie Stolte, Columbus State Community College
Rodney Ridenour, Montana State University Northern Gloria Jean Stuart, Georgia Southern University
John Robertson, Arkansas State University Kenton Swift, University of Montana
Susan Robinson, Georgia Southwestern State University Erin Towery, The University of Georgia
Morgan Rockett, Moberly Area Community College Ronald Unger, Temple University
Miles Romney, Michigan State University Karen Wallace, Ramapo College
Ananth Seetharaman, Saint Louis University Natasha Ware, Southeastern University
Alisa Shapiro, Raritan Valley Community College Luke Watson, University of Florida
Deanna Sharpe, University of Missouri Sarah Webber, University of Dayton
Wayne Shaw, Southern Methodist University Cassandra Weitzenkamp, Peru State College
Sonia Singh, University of Florida Marvin Williams, University of Houston—Downtown
Georgi Smatrakalev, Florida Atlantic University Chris Woehrle, American College
Lucia Smeal, Georgia State University Jennifer Wright, Drexel University
Pamela Smith, University of Texas at San Antonio Massood Yahya-Zadeh, George Mason University
Adam Spoolstra, Johnson County Community College James Yang, Montclair State University
Joe Standridge, Sonoma State Scott Yetmar, Cleveland State University
Jason Stanfield, Ball State University Charlie Yuan, Elizabeth City State University
George Starbuck, McMurry University Xiaoli Yuan, Elizabeth City State University
James Stekelberg, University of Arizona Mingjun Zhou, DePaul University
Shane Stinson, University of Alabama

Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the many talented people who made valuable contributions to the creation of this tenth edition.
William A. Padley of Madison Area Technical College, Deanna Sharpe of the University of Missouri–Columbia, and
Troy Lewis of Brigham Young University checked the page proofs and solutions manual for accuracy; we greatly appre-
ciate the hours they spent checking tax forms and double-checking our calculations throughout the book. Teressa Farough,
Troy Lewis of Brigham Young University, Lara Kessler of Grand Valley State University and Eric McLimore accuracy-
checked the test bank. Thank you to Troy Lewis, Monika Turek, and Jason Stanfield for your contributions to the Smart-
book revision for this edition. Special thanks to Troy Lewis of Brigham Young University for his sharp eye and valuable
feedback throughout the revision process. Thanks as well to Marilyn Isaacks from Agate Publishing for managing the
supplement process. Finally, William A. Padley of Madison Area Technical College, Deanna Sharpe of the University of
Missouri–Columbia, and Vivian Paige of Old Dominion University greatly contributed to the accuracy of McGraw-Hill’s
Connect for the 2019 edition.
We also appreciate the expert attention given to this project by the staff at McGraw-Hill Education, especially Tim Vert-
ovec, Managing Director; Kathleen Klehr, Executive Portfolio Manager; Danielle Andries, Senior Product Developer; Erin
Quinones, Product Developer; Lori Koetters, Brian Nacik, and Jill Eccher, Content Project Managers; Matt Backhaus,
Designer; Natalie King, Marketing Director; Zach Rudin, Marketing Manager; and Sue Culbertson, Senior Buyer.

xx
Changes in Taxation of Individuals and
Business Entities, 2019 Edition
For the 2019 edition of McGraw-Hill’s Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities, many changes
were made in response to feedback from reviewers and focus group participants:
∙ All tax forms have been updated for the latest ∙ Updated Exhibit 4-7 to reflect standard deduction
available tax form as of March 2018. In addition, amounts for 2018.
chapter content throughout the text has been ∙ Edited Exhibit 4-5 to remove moving expenses.
updated to reflect tax law changes through ∙ Changed Example 4-2 to replace moving expenses
March 2018. with IRA contribution.
∙ Updated discussion of child tax credits to reflect
Other notable changes in the 2019 edition include: new law.
∙ Updated examples to reflect changes in child tax
Chapter 1 credit under new tax law.
∙ Updated tax rates for 2018 and Examples 1-3 ∙ Revised section on personal and dependency
through 1-7. ­exemptions to emphasize who qualifies as a
∙ Updated Social Security Wage base for 2018. ­dependent of the taxpayer.
∙ Updated unified Tax Credit for 2018. ∙ Revised discussion of why determining filing status
∙ Deleted Taxes in the Real World: Affordable Care is important.
Act amount for 2018 which was repealed. ∙ Revised filing status discussion to emphasize
∙ Updated Taxes in the Real World: National Debt for ­claiming a dependent rather than claiming an
current debt limit. ­exemption for a dependent.
∙ Updated Exhibit 1-4 for 2017 Federal revenues by ∙ Edited flowcharts in appendices to emphasize
source from Treasury. ­claiming a dependent rather than claiming an
∙ Updated Exhibit 1-5 for 2017 State revenues by ­exemption for a dependent.
source from U.S. Census. ∙ Added two new discussion questions to address
­questions relating to the new tax law.
Chapter 2
∙ Deleted one problem dealing with dependency
∙ Updated gross income thresholds by filing status for exemptions.
2018 for new tax law changes. ∙ Edited approximately 10 percent of the problems to re-
∙ Updated discussion of filing requirements for married flect changes in the tax law allowing the deduction for
taxpayers for new tax law changes. qualified business income or dependency exemptions.
∙ Revised discussion of Preparer Tax Identification ∙ Updated tax rates for 2018.
Numbers (PTIN). ∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms.
∙ Revised end of chapter problems to reflect tax law
changes. Chapter 5
Chapter 3 ∙ Revised discussion of claim of right doctrine for
∙ Updated tax rates for 2018. ­individuals required to repay compensation for tax
∙ Added Taxes in the Real World: Tax Reform and Tax law changes.
Planning. ∙ Updated discussion of alimony for tax law changes.
∙ Updated Exhibit 3-3 for new tax rates post TCJA. ∙ Updated discussion of employee awards for length of
∙ Modified Examples 3-7 and 3-8 to reflect changes in service or safety awards for tax law changes.
tax planning from TCJA. ∙ Clarified discussion of the deductibility of gambling
expenses for tax law changes.
Chapter 4 ∙ Updated discussion of discharge of indebtedness for
∙ Streamlined Learning Objective 4-1. tax law changes.
∙ Edited Learning Objective 4-2 to emphasize ∙ Revised discussion of fringe benefits and moving
­dependents instead of exemptions. ­expenses for tax law changes.
∙ Updated Exhibit 4-1 to reflect changes in the ∙ Added a discussion of accountable plan
­Individual Tax Formula reimbursements.

xxi
∙ Updated for 2018 amounts for Flexible Spending deductions subject to 2 percent AGI floor (employee
­Account contributions. business expenses, tax preparation fees, hobby
∙ Revised discussion of Section 529 plans for tax law ­expenses, investment expenses)
changes. ∙ Eliminated discussion of itemized deduction and
∙ Added Taxes in the Real World on the taxation of ­personal exemption phase-outs repealed by tax law
prizes. changes.
∙ Updated for 2018 foreign income exclusion amounts. ∙ Updated standard deduction amounts for tax law
∙ Updated for annual gift tax exclusion and unified tax changes.
credit for 2018. ∙ Eliminated discussion of personal and dependency
∙ Revised discussion of athletic scholarships. exemptions repealed by tax law changes.
∙ Updated U.S. Series EE Bond interest income ∙ Added discussion for new deduction for qualified
­exclusion for 2018. business income.
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms. ∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms.
∙ Updated end of chapter problems for tax law changes ∙ Substantially revised end of chapter problems for tax
law changes.
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
∙ Revised discussion of deductibility of business versus
∙ Added Taxes in the Real World: So You Want to
investment related expenses under for tax law
­Invest in Bitcoin.
changes.
∙ Updated tax rates in all examples and problems for
∙ Revised Exhibit 6-1: Individual Business and Invest-
2018.
ment Related Deductions for AGI, from AGI, and Not
∙ Revised discussion about when qualified dividends
Deductible.
are taxed at 0, 15, or 20 percent based on TCJA
∙ Added discussion for new excess business loss
changes.
limitation.
∙ Modified definition of capital assets to exclude
∙ Revised discussion of moving expenses for tax law
­self-created patents, inventions, models or designs,
changes.
and secret formulas.
∙ Revised discussion of alimony deduction for tax law
∙ Updated Exhibit 7-3.
changes.
∙ Revised discussion about how taxpayers determine
∙ Revised discussion of deduction for interest on quali-
whether capital gains are taxed at 0, 15, or 20 percent.
fied education loan for tax law changes.
∙ Added new key terms: maximum zero rate amount
∙ Eliminate discussion of expired deduction for
and maximum 15-percent rate amount.
­qualified education expenses.
∙ Added new Exhibit 7-3 to illustrate maximum zero
∙ Updated AGI floor for medical expense itemized
rate amount and maximum 15-percent rate amounts
­deduction for tax law change.
by filing status and income.
∙ Updated mileage rate for medical expense itemized
∙ Updated examples for changes in capital gains rate
deduction for 2018.
thresholds.
∙ Added discussion on new cap on itemized deductions
∙ Clarified footnote 26 to reflect the requirement to add
for taxes.
back seven percent of excluded §1202 gain for AMT
∙ Revised discussion of mortgage interest deduction to purposes.
reflect new cap on acquisition indebtedness and non- ∙ Substantially revised the method for calculating tax
deductibility of interest on home-equity indebtedness.
liability on net capital gains and related example 7-9.
∙ Revised discussion of investment interest expense de-
∙ Revised discussion on investment expenses and
duction for tax law change that eliminates the deduc-
­investment interest expense.
tion for investment expenses as itemized deductions.
∙ Updated note on cost basis required to be reported by
∙ Revised discussion of charitable contributions for
brokers.
new 60 percent AGI limit for cash contributions to
∙ Added new discussion question regarding sale of
public charities and private operating foundations.
­passive activity.
∙ Revised Exhibit 6-8: Summary of Charitable
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms.
­Contributions Limitation Rules.
∙ Revised discussion of casualty and theft losses on Chapter 8
personal-use assets for tax law changes. ∙ Updated tax rate schedules to reflect tax law changes.
∙ Revised discussion of miscellaneous itemized deduc- ∙ Updated discussion of marriage penalty or benefit for
tions to reflect tax law changes that eliminated these tax law changes.

xxii
∙ Revised discussion of kiddie tax for tax law changes. ∙ Revised accounting method changes to reflect new
∙ Revised discussion of the tax calculation for preferen- provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act updated dates
tially taxed capital gains and dividends for tax law in examples.
changes. ∙ Revised Exhibit 9-6 for changes in solutions due to
∙ Updated AMT discussion for new tax law changes accounting method changes in the Tax Cuts and
­related to adjustments, exemption amounts, and Jobs Act.
phase-out of exemptions. ∙ Eliminated discussion questions on domestic manu-
∙ Updated AMT tax rate schedule for 2018. facturing deduction and added new discussion ques-
∙ Updated Social Security Tax wage base and Self-­ tions about business interest limitation.
Employment Tax base for 2018. ∙ Revised discussion questions to reflect accounting
∙ Revised discussion of Medicare and additional method changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
­Medicare tax. ∙ Eliminated problems on domestic manufacturing
∙ Updated discussion of child tax credit for tax law ­deduction and added new problems with business
changes. ­interest limitation.
∙ Updated Lifetime Learning Credit phase-out for 2018. ∙ Revised problems to reflect accounting method
∙ Updated discussion of education credits for expiration changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
of the deduction for qualified education expenses.
∙ Updated Earned Income Credit amounts for 2018. Chapter 10
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms. ∙ Modified story line to better apply to changes in
∙ Revised end of chapter problems for tax law changes. tax law.
∙ Updated all examples for new purchase price on
Chapter 9 Teton’s assets.
∙ Introduction was updated and the learning objectives ∙ Updated Exhibit 10-2 for Weyerhaueser’s 2016 assets.
were consolidated. ∙ Updated tax rates for 2018.
∙ Revised descriptions of deductions to reflect changes ∙ Updated footnote 2 relating to depreciation allowed
in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. or allowable.
∙ Revised descriptions of general limitations on busi- ∙ Added new footnote to explain the opportunity to
ness deductions to reflect changes in the Tax Cuts ­expense new roofs post TCJA.
and Jobs Act. ∙ Added new preface to the depreciation section to
∙ Added text description and example of new business ­explain impact of TCJA and under what conditions
interest limitation. MACRS may be relevant.
∙ Revised text discussion of limitations on business ∙ Moved the discussion about mid-quarter convention
­deductions for meals and entertainment. to new Appendix B.
∙ Revised examples to reflect changes in the Tax Cuts ∙ Added discussion to explain changes to qualified
and Jobs Act. ­improvement property.
∙ Revised examples and text discussion for updated ∙ Revised Example 10-7 (old 10-12) to include depre-
2018 mileage rates. ciation for two years on real property.
∙ Added new TIRW to describe application of substan- ∙ Revised section on §179 amounts to reflect the larger
tiation rules and the Cohan rule. 2018 amounts post-TCJA.
∙ Deleted discussion and illustration of domestic manu- ∙ Added footnote relating to definition of qualified real
facturing deduction eliminated in the Tax Cuts and property for purposes of §179.
Jobs Act. ∙ Updated Examples 10-9 through 10-12 (old Examples
∙ Revised text description, examples, and Exhibit 9-2 10-14 through 10-17) for 2018 §179 amounts.
to reflect changes in casualty loss deductions in the ∙ Substantially revised bonus depreciation section to
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. include TCJA changes in percentages and qualified
∙ Revised footnotes and added example of 52-53 property.
week year. ∙ Added new Exhibit 10-8 to illustrate Bonus Deprecia-
∙ Revised text descriptions of cash method, UNICAP, tion Percentages.
and inventory accounting to reflect changes in the ∙ Added bonus depreciation Example 10-13.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ∙ Revised listed property discussion to reflect removal
∙ Revised accounting for advanced payments of reve- of computer equipment as listed property.
nue to reflect accounting method changes in the Tax ∙ Updated discussion and Exhibit 10-9 (old 10-8)
Cuts and Jobs Act. ­relating to automobile depreciation limits.

xxiii
∙ Updated examples in listed property section to reflect ∙ Updated 50 percent of end of chapter problems for
TCJA changes. tax law changes.
∙ Added new discussion about the use of §179 for
automobiles. Chapter 13
∙ Added new discussion and examples about the interac- ∙ Streamlined wording in Learning Objectives 13-4
tion of bonus depreciation and the automobile depre- and 13-5.
ciation limitations. Includes new discussion of method ∙ Changed marginal tax rates in storyline to reflect tax
for calculating depreciation on automobiles after year 1 rate brackets effective for 2018.
when 100 percent bonus depreciation is taken. ∙ Updated footnote 1 to reflect the 2017 OASDI
∙ Added Taxes in the Real World: Cost Segregation. ­Trustees report.
∙ Updated Exhibit 10-10 (old 10-9) to reflect Teton’s ∙ Updated inflation adjusted limits for defined benefit
use of bonus depreciation in addition to §179 and plans, defined contribution plans, and individually
MACRS for two years of asset acquisitions. managed plans.
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms. ∙ Updated Exhibit 13-6 to reflect the most recent proxy
∙ Added new footnote 64 to describe treatment of R&D statement for Coca-Cola Company.
costs after 2021. ∙ Revised discussion of employer issues for deferred
∙ Updated and revised end-of-chapter problems for compensation to indicate that employers can no
§179 amounts and bonus depreciation rules ­longer use deferred compensation to circumvent the
post-TCJA. $1,000,000 compensation deduction limitation under
§162(m).
Chapter 11 ∙ Removed old discussion question 31 dealing with
∙ Modified story line to better apply to changes in ­deferred compensation and the §162(m) limitation.
tax law ∙ Revised discussion in IRA section to use modified
∙ Updated examples for new purchase price on Teton’s AGI rather than AGI when describing deduction and
assets. contribution limitations.
∙ Updated Exhibit 11-4 for changes to capital gains ∙ Updated flowcharts in appendices to reflect modified
threshold amounts. AGI rather than AGI when describing IRA deduction
∙ Added discussion about how changes to depreciation and contribution limitations.
from TCJA might affect dispositions. ∙ Updated modified AGI phase-out thresholds for
∙ Updated Exhibit 11-6 for changes to Teton’s assets. ­deductible contributions to traditional IRAs and
∙ Modified discussion on like-kind exchanges to reflect ­contributions to Roth IRAs.
application to real property only. ∙ Added discussion question comparing modified AGI
∙ Modified Examples 11-15, 11-16, and 11-17 for like- and AGI.
kind exchanges. ∙ Edited marginal tax rates in problems to reflect tax
∙ Updated discussion for involuntary conversion when rate schedule under new tax law.
contrasting qualified property to like-kind exchanges. ∙ Modified Taxes in the Real World relating to Roth
∙ Updated like-kind exchange EOC problems. and traditional retirement savings vehicles to ask how
∙ Updated tax rates for 2018. new tax laws might affect this choice for taxpayers.
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms. ∙ Updated calculations for limits on self-employed
­retirement accounts to reflect updated 2018 social
Chapter 12 ­security wage base limitation.
∙ Updated qualified transportation fringe benefit ∙ Updated Saver’s credit information for 2018.
amounts for 2018. ∙ Added an explanation requirement to Discussion
∙ Updated Section 163(m) limitation on executive Question 8.
compensation.
∙ Updated 70 percent of examples for change in corpo- Chapter 14
rate tax rates. ∙ Streamlined Learning Objectives 14-2, 14-5, and 14-6.
∙ Updated tax forms to 2017. ∙ Revised LO 14-3 to emphasize home mortgage inter-
∙ Inserted new discussion of qualified equity grants. est deduction.
∙ Updated Taxes in the Real World for 2017 proxy ∙ Revised storyline summary information to reflect
statement information. higher income for taxpayers and new marginal tax
∙ Updated nontaxable fringe benefit section for changes rate consistent with 2018 tax rate brackets.
in qualified moving expenses. ∙ Streamlined introductory paragraph to the chapter.

xxiv
∙ Revised Exhibit 14-1 to eliminate deduction for home ∙ Added mention of Certificate of Organization as a re-
mortgage insurance and to eliminate exclusion for quired filing to create a new LLC in certain states.
forgiveness of debt on home mortgage foreclosure ∙ Updated notes to Exhibit 15-1 to clarify that certain
­because these items have not been extended to 2017 limited partnerships are eligible for IPOs.
or 2018 (as of press time). ∙ Replaced data in Taxes in the Real World on Com-
∙ Moved discussion of deduction of home mortgage paring Entities Selected with more recent data from
­insurance and exclusion for forgiveness of debt on the IRS.
home mortgage to a footnote. ∙ Replaced the entire section on Double Taxation with
∙ Included explanation of leverage in second paragraph new section on Taxation of Business Entity Income.
in Personal Use of the Home section. This section includes discussion of how flow-through
∙ Retitled section on Interest Expense on Home-­ entity income is taxed under new law and includes
Related Debt to Home Mortgage Interest Deduction discussion on deduction for qualified business
and revised discussion in first paragraph to reflect ­income and discussion of the self-employment tax
­recent tax law changes affecting mortgage interest for business owners.
deductions. ∙ Revised discussion of how C corporations are taxed.
∙ Revised discussion of home mortgage interest to This section includes discussion of the new tax rate
­reflect new limitation on acquisition indebtedness for C corporations, the revised NOL rules, and the
and to reflect the fact that interest on home equity new DRD percentages.
­indebtedness is no longer deductible. ∙ Added a section on owner compensation.
∙ Removed detailed discussion of determining limitation ∙ Added section on deductibility of entity losses to
on deductibility of interest when qualifying debt ­include revised NOL rules for C corporations and the
­exceeds the limitation. new excess loss limitation for noncorporate
∙ Revised Taxes in the Real World on home interest de- taxpayers.
ductions to reflect the changes in limits to acquisition ∙ Updated Taxes in the Real Word: Best Entity Choice
indebtedness and the elimination of interest deduction for Small Businesses? to reflect findings from a more
for home equity indebtedness. recent study. Also, added information about the
∙ Added explanation of refinancing in Points section. ­number of small businesses filing as partnerships
∙ Revised discussion on real property taxes to reflect and as S corporations.
$10,000 limitation on the itemized deduction for ∙ Revised discussion of Converting to Other Entity
taxes, including examples and problems. Types to reflect changes in the tax law and reasons
∙ Added new Taxes in the Real World emphasizing why owners may wish to convert, given the new law.
Airbnb. ∙ Revised the final discussion in the storyline. The
∙ Revised discussion of the IRS method and the Tax ­taxpayer now chooses a C corporation rather than a
Court method to reflect the circumstances in which partnership form for tax purposes.
each is more favorable given the new tax law. ∙ Revised Ethics discussion to include a situation
∙ Clarified discussion about home office expense where owner is potentially paying himself too little
requirements. compensation.
∙ Revised discussion about home office expenses to ∙ Changed or revised approximately 25 percent of the
­indicate that employees can no longer claim the end of chapter problems.
deduction.
Chapter 16
∙ Revised Appendix B to reflect the $10,000 limit on
the itemized deduction for taxes. ∙ Updated the discussion on stock option
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017. compensation.
∙ Updated settlement statement in Appendix A to ∙ Revised Taxes in the Real World for Facebook stock
­reflect 2018 information. options.
∙ Removed five discussion questions/problems that are ∙ Updated the compliance section for new year-end
no longer relevant given new tax law. filing.
∙ Revised/added 17 discussion questions/problems to Chapter 17
reflect new tax law. ∙ Updated the Taxes in the Real World saga of
Weatherford.
Chapter 15 ∙ Updated the material to incorporate the new FASB
∙ Clarified the discussion in “Rights, Responsibilities, rules on disclosures of deferred tax assets and
and Legal Arrangements among Owners.” liabilities.

xxv
∙ Updated the Microsoft uncertain tax benefit footnote Chapter 20
disclosure. ∙ Updated the discussion of self-employment income
∙ Updated the FASB’s projects involving accounting from partnerships to include the impact of recent
for income taxes. case law.
∙ Revised the opening storyline of the chapter. The
Chapter 18 chapter assumes the taxpayer chooses to operate the
∙ Recharacterized stock dividends as distributions business as a partnership for tax purposes.
(throughout the chapter). ∙ Added discussion on the new rule dealing with the
∙ Simplified and streamline the introduction to availability of the cash method of accounting for
­dividends and corporate distributions. partnerships.
∙ Clarified explanation of deductible expense in the ∙ Added discussion on the new limitation on business
calculation of E&P. interest deductions in the partnerships setting.
∙ Clarified the introduction into the ordering of E&P ∙ Added discussion on new deduction for qualified
distributions. business income.
∙ Revised the description of noncash distributions to be ∙ Added discussion on new excess business loss limita-
consistent throughout the chapter. tion and how it interacts with other loss limitation
∙ Revised E&P calculations and examples for changes rules.
in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms.
∙ Explained dividend signaling in simpler terms. ∙ Added material related to how the passive activity
∙ Revised examples for changes in the Tax Cuts and loss rules apply to publicly traded partnerships.
Jobs Act. ∙ Revised four problems to reflect changes in the Tax
∙ Revised the description of stock dividends. Cut and Jobs Act.
∙ Clarified the explanation of stock distributions.
∙ Clarified and defined bright line (objective) tests. Chapter 21
∙ Elaborated on the strategic purpose of redemptions. ∙ Clarified the approach for making a §754 election.
∙ Added Time Warner redemption as TIRW. ∙ Revised the definition of substantial built-in loss to
∙ Eleven problems modified for changes in the Tax reflect changes in the Tax Cut and Jobs Act.
Cuts and Jobs Act.
Chapter 22
Chapter 19 ∙ Revised discussion of debt basis rules.
∙ Added discussion of 30 percent of taxable income
∙ Clarified purpose of Section 351 in introduction.
limitation on the deduction for business interest
∙ Clarified some definitions and terms in the
­expense under new tax law.
introduction.
∙ Added discussion of deduction for qualified business
∙ Revised description of contributions to capital for
income under new tax law.
changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
∙ Added discussion of excess business loss limitation
∙ Minor revisions to text under learning objective 3.
under new tax law.
∙ Added two new TIRWs. One illustrates a 338(h)(10)
∙ Added discussion of new PTTP distributions for
election with a tax receivable and the other is new
­eligible terminated S corporations under new tax law.
­example of corporate tax-free acquisition.
∙ Updated Social Security Tax wage base for 2018.
∙ Revised Forward Triangular Type A merger descrip-
∙ Updated tax forms from 2016 to 2017 forms.
tion to state rule then example.
∙ Revised end of chapter problems for tax law changes.
∙ Revised Triangular Type A merger description to
state rule then example.
Chapter 23
∙ Revised Type B acquisition description to state rule
then example. ∙ Updated Amazon sales tax collection information.
∙ Revised examples for changes in the Tax Cuts and ∙ Updated federal/state adjustments for income taxes.
Jobs Act.
∙ Revised 8 discussion questions. Chapter 24
∙ Clarified several questions and added two new acqui- ∙ Updated the discussion on the OECD base erosion
sition research questions. and profit-shifting project.
∙ Three problems revised to reflect changes in the Tax ∙ Updated the proposals for international tax reform.
Cuts and Jobs Act. ∙ Updated the discussion on inversions.

xxvi
Chapter 25 ∙ Revised calculations, text descriptions, and examples
∙ Revised Exhibit 25-2 and description of common to reflect changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
­features of the transfer taxes to reflect changes in the ∙ Replaced Exhibit 25-8 with 2018 Form 706.
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ∙ Revised examples for changes in the Tax Cuts and
∙ Revised calculations, text descriptions, and examples Jobs Act.
to reflect changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ∙ Revised 4 discussion questions and 23 problems to
∙ Replaced Exhibit 25-5 with 2017 Form 709. reflect changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

NEW! Resources for 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs


Act—Available in 2018© and 2019©
∙ Brief Explainer Videos—Offers insights to students ∙ Tagged Content in Connect—Added metadata tags to
into new tax laws by comparing and contrasting with help instructors filter for end-of-chapter/test bank
old tax code. content impacted by 2017 tax reform.
∙ Chapter Overviews—Identifies the tax law changes ∙ PowerPoints on Tax Changes—New slides detailing
for each learning objective. the updated laws on a chapter-by-chapter basis.
∙ Individual Chapter Guides—Provides summary descrip- ∙ Ongoing Author Webinars and Teaching Tips
tion of new tax laws, expanding on the chapter overview.
∙ Problem Map—Marks the end-of-chapter content and
test bank content affected by new tax laws in an eas-
ily navigable spreadsheet.

As We Go to Press
The 2019 Edition is current through March, 2018. You can visit the Connect
Library for updates that occur after this date.

xxvii
Table of Contents

1 An Introduction to Tax Tax Law Sources 2-9


Legislative Sources: Congress and the
Who Cares about Taxes and Why? 1-2 Constitution 2-11
What Qualifies as a Tax? 1-4 Internal Revenue Code 2-11
How to Calculate a Tax 1-5 The Legislative Process for Tax Laws 2-12
Different Ways to Measure Tax Rates 1-5 Basic Organization of the Code 2-13
Tax Treaties 2-14
Tax Rate Structures 1-8
Judicial Sources: The Courts 2-14
Proportional Tax Rate Structure 1-9
Administrative Sources: The U.S. Treasury 2-15
Progressive Tax Rate Structure 1-9
Regulations, Revenue Rulings, and Revenue
Regressive Tax Rate Structure 1-10
Procedures 2-15
Types of Taxes 1-11 Letter Rulings 2-16
Federal Taxes 1-11
Tax Research 2-17
Income Tax 1-12
Step 1: Understand Facts 2-17
Employment and Unemployment Taxes 1-12
Step 2: Identify Issues 2-17
Excise Taxes 1-13
Step 3: Locate Relevant Authorities 2-18
Transfer Taxes 1-13
Step 4: Analyze Tax Authorities 2-19
State and Local Taxes 1-14
Step 5: Document and Communicate the
Income Taxes 1-14 Results 2-21
Sales and Use Taxes 1-14 Facts 2-21
Property Taxes 1-15 Issues 2-21
Excise Taxes 1-15 Authorities 2-22
Implicit Taxes 1-16 Conclusion 2-22
Evaluating Alternative Tax Systems 1-17 Analysis 2-22
Sufficiency 1-18 Client Letters 2-22
Static versus Dynamic Forecasting 1-18 Research Question and Limitations 2-22
Income versus Substitution Effects 1-19 Facts 2-22
Equity 1-20 Analysis 2-22
Horizontal versus Vertical Equity 1-21 Closing 2-22
Certainty 1-22 Tax Professional Responsibilities 2-23
Convenience 1-22
Taxpayer and Tax Practitioner Penalties 2-26
Economy 1-22
Conclusion 2-28
Evaluating Tax Systems—The Trade-Off 1-23
Conclusion 1-23
3 Tax Planning Strategies and
Related Limitations
2 Tax Compliance, the IRS, and
Basic Tax Planning Overview 3-2
Tax Authorities
Timing Strategies 3-2
Taxpayer Filing Requirements 2-2
Present Value of Money 3-3
Tax Return Due Date and Extensions 2-3
The Timing Strategy When Tax Rates Are
Statute of Limitations 2-3 Constant 3-4
IRS Audit Selection 2-4 The Timing Strategy When Tax Rates
Types of Audits 2-5 Change 3-7
After the Audit 2-6 Limitations to Timing Strategies 3-10

xxviii
Table of Contents xxix

Income-Shifting Strategies 3-11 5 Gross Income and Exclusions


Transactions between Family Members and
Limitations 3-12 Realization and Recognition of Income 5-2
Transactions between Owners and What Is Included in Gross Income? 5-2
Their Businesses and Limitations 3-12 Economic Benefit 5-3
Income Shifting across Jurisdictions and Realization Principle 5-3
Limitations 3-15 Recognition 5-4
Conversion Strategies 3-15 Other Income Concepts 5-4
Limitations of Conversion Form of Receipt 5-4
Strategies 3-18 Return of Capital Principle 5-4
Additional Limitations to Tax Planning Recovery of Amounts Previously
Strategies: Judicially-Based Deducted 5-5
Doctrines 3-18 When Do Taxpayers Recognize Income? 5-6
Tax Avoidance versus Tax Evasion 3-19 Accounting Methods 5-6
Conclusion 3-20 Constructive Receipt 5-7
Claim of Right 5-7
Who Recognizes the Income? 5-8
4 Individual Income Tax Overview, Assignment of Income 5-8
Dependents, and Filing Status Community Property Systems 5-8
Types of Income 5-9
The Individual Income Tax Formula 4-2
Income from Services 5-10
Gross Income 4-2
Income from Property 5-10
Character of Income 4-5
Annuities 5-11
Deductions 4-7
Property Dispositions 5-13
For AGI Deductions 4-7
Other Sources of Gross Income 5-14
From AGI Deductions 4-8
Income from Flow-Through Entities 5-14
Income Tax Calculation 4-10
Alimony 5-14
Other Taxes 4-11
Prizes, Awards, and Gambling Winnings 5-16
Tax Credits 4-11
Social Security Benefits 5-17
Tax Prepayments 4-11
Imputed Income 5-19
Dependents of the Taxpayer 4-12 Discharge of Indebtedness 5-20
Dependency Requirements 4-12 Exclusion Provisions 5-21
Qualifying Child 4-12 Common Exclusions 5-21
Qualifying Relative 4-15 Municipal Bond Interest 5-21
Filing Status 4-19 Gains on the Sale of Personal
Married Filing Jointly and Married Filing Residence 5-22
Separately 4-19 Fringe Benefits 5-23
Qualifying Widow or Widower (Surviving Education-Related Exclusions 5-25
Spouse) 4-20 Scholarships 5-25
Single 4-21 Other Educational Subsidies 5-26
Head of Household 4-21 U.S. Series EE Bonds 5-26
Married Individuals Treated as Unmarried Exclusions That Mitigate Double Taxation 5-27
(Abandoned Spouse) 4-23
Gifts and Inheritances 5-27
Summary of Income Tax Formula 4-24 Life Insurance Proceeds 5-27
Conclusion 4-27 Foreign-Earned Income 5-28
Appendix A: Dependency Exemption Flowchart Sickness and Injury-Related Exclusions 5-29
(Part I) 4-27 Workers’ Compensation 5-29
Appendix B: Qualifying Person for Payments Associated with Personal
Head of Household Filing Status Injury 5-29
Flowchart 4-29 Health Care Reimbursement 5-30
Appendix C: Determination of Filing Status Disability Insurance 5-30
Flowchart 4-30 Deferral Provisions 5-31
xxx Table of Contents

Income Summary 5-31 7 Investments


Conclusion 5-32
Investments Overview 7-2
Appendix: 2017 Social Security Worksheet from
Portfolio Income: Interest and Dividends 7-2
Form 1040 5-33
Interest 7-3
Corporate and U.S. Treasury Bonds 7-3
6 Individual Deductions U.S. Savings Bonds 7-4
Dividends 7-6
Deductions for AGI 6-2
Deductions Directly Related to Business Portfolio Income: Capital Gains and Losses 7-7
Activities 6-2 Types of Capital Gains and Losses 7-10
Trade or Business Expenses 6-4 25 Percent Gains 7-10
Rental and Royalty Expenses 6-5 28 Percent Gains 7-11
Losses on Dispositions 6-6 Netting Process for Gains and Losses 7-12
Flow-Through Entities 6-6 Calculating Tax Liability on Net Capital
Excess Business Loss Limitation 6-6 Gains 7-16
Deductions Indirectly Related to Business Limits for Capital Loss Deductions 7-21
Activities 6-6 Losses on the Sale of Personal-Use
Moving Expenses 6-7 Assets 7-21
Health Insurance Deduction by Self- Capital Losses on Sales to Related
Employed Taxpayers 6-7 Parties 7-22
Self-Employment Tax Deduction 6-7 Wash Sales 7-22
Penalty for Early Withdrawal of Savings 6-8 Balancing Tax Planning Strategies for Capital
Assets with Other Goals 7-23
Deductions Subsidizing Specific Activities 6-8
Portfolio Income Summary 7-24
Deduction for Interest on Qualified Education
Loans 6-9 Investment Interest Expense 7-25
Summary: Deductions for AGI 6-10 Net Investment Income Tax 7-27
Deductions from AGI: Itemized Deductions 6-10 Passive Activity Income and Losses 7-28
Medical Expenses 6-11 Passive Activity Definition 7-29
Transportation and Travel for Medical Income and Loss Categories 7-29
Purposes 6-12 Rental Real Estate Exception to the Passive
Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities 6-13 Activity Loss Rules 7-32
Medical Expense Deduction Limitation 6-13 Net Investment Income Tax on Net Passive
Taxes 6-14 Income 7-32
Interest 6-15 Conclusion 7-33
Charitable Contributions 6-15
8 Individual Income Tax Computation
Contributions of Money 6-16
and Tax Credits
Contributions of Property Other Than
Money 6-17 Regular Federal Income Tax Computation 8-2
Charitable Contribution Deduction Tax Rate Schedules 8-2
Limitations 6-18 Marriage Penalty or Benefit 8-3
Casualty and Theft Losses on Personal-Use Exceptions to the Basic Tax Computation 8-3
Assets 6-21
Preferential Tax Rates for Capital Gains and
Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions 6-21 Dividends 8-4
Summary of Itemized Deductions 6-22 Net Investment Income Tax 8-5
The Standard Deduction 6-22 Kiddie Tax 8-6
Standard Deduction 6-22 Alternative Minimum Tax 8-8
Bunching Itemized Deductions 6-25 Alternative Minimum Tax Formula 8-9
Deduction for Qualified Business Income 6-26 Alternative Minimum Taxable Income
Deduction for Qualified Business Income 6-26 (AMTI) 8-9
Limitations 6-28 AMT Exemption 8-12
Taxable Income Summary 6-29 Tentative Minimum Tax and AMT
Conclusion 6-30 Computation 8-12
Table of Contents xxxi

Employment and Self-Employment Taxes 8-14 Specific Business Deductions 9-12


Employee FICA Taxes Payable 8-14 Losses on Dispositions of Business
Self-Employment Taxes 8-16 Property 9-12
Employee vs. Self-Employed (Independent Business Casualty Losses 9-12
Contractor) 8-21 Accounting Periods 9-13
Employee vs. Independent Contractor Accounting Methods 9-14
Comparison 8-21
Financial and Tax Accounting Methods 9-15
Tax Credits 8-23 Overall Accounting Method 9-15
Nonrefundable Personal Credits 8-24 Cash Method 9-15
Child Tax Credit 8-24 Accrual Method 9-16
Child and Dependent Care Credit 8-25 Accrual Income 9-17
Education Credits 8-27 All-Events Test for Income 9-17
Refundable Personal Credits 8-29 Taxation of Advance Payments of Income
Earned Income Credit 8-29 (Unearned Income) 9-17
Other Refundable Personal Credits 8-31 Advance Payments for Goods and
Business Tax Credits 8-31 Services 9-18
Foreign Tax Credit 8-31 Inventories 9-18
Tax Credit Summary 8-32 Uniform Capitalization 9-19
Credit Application Sequence 8-32 Inventory Cost-Flow Methods 9-19
Taxpayer Prepayments and Filing Accrual Deductions 9-21
Requirements 8-34 All-Events Test for Deductions 9-21
Prepayments 8-34 Economic Performance 9-21
Underpayment Penalties 8-35 Bad Debt Expense 9-24
Filing Requirements 8-36 Limitations on Accruals to Related
Late Filing Penalty 8-37 Persons 9-25
Late Payment Penalty 8-37 Comparison of Accrual and Cash
Methods 9-26
Tax Summary 8-37
Adopting an Accounting Method 9-27
Conclusion 8-39
Changing Accounting Methods 9-28
Tax Consequences of Changing Accounting
9 Business Income, Deductions, and Methods 9-30
Accounting Methods Conclusion 9-31

Business Gross Income 9-2


10 Property Acquisition and
Business Deductions 9-2
Cost Recovery
Ordinary and Necessary 9-3
Reasonable in Amount 9-4 Cost Recovery and Tax Basis for Cost
Recovery 10-2
Limitations on Business Deductions 9-4
Basis for Cost Recovery 10-3
Expenditures against Public Policy 9-4
Political Contributions and Lobbying Costs 9-5 Depreciation 10-6
Capital Expenditures 9-5 Personal Property Depreciation 10-7
Expenses Associated with the Production of Tax- Depreciation Method 10-7
Exempt Income 9-5 Depreciation Recovery Period 10-8
Personal Expenditures 9-6 Depreciation Conventions 10-9
Mixed-Motive Expenditures 9-8 Calculating Depreciation for Personal
Meals 9-8 Property 10-10
Travel and Transportation 9-8 Applying the Half-Year Convention 10-11
Property Use 9-10 Applying the Mid-Quarter Convention 10-13
Record Keeping and Other Real Property 10-14
Requirements 9-11 Applicable Method 10-15
Limitation on Business Interest Applicable Convention 10-15
Deductions 9-11 Depreciation Tables 10-15
xxxii Table of Contents

Special Rules Relating to Cost Recovery 10-17 Gain or Loss Summary 11-20
Immediate Expensing (§179) 10-17 Nonrecognition Transactions 11-20
Bonus Depreciation 10-21 Like-Kind Exchanges 11-20
Listed Property 10-23 Definition of Like-Kind Property 11-24
Luxury Automobiles 10-26 Property Use 11-24
Depreciation for the Alternative Minimum Timing Requirements for a Like-Kind
Tax 10-30 Exchange 11-25
Depreciation Summary 10-30 Tax Consequences When Like-Kind
Amortization 10-32 Property Is Exchanged Solely for Like-Kind
Section 197 Intangibles 10-32 Property 11-26
Organizational Expenditures and Start-Up Tax Consequences of Transfers Involving
Costs 10-33 Like-Kind and Non-Like-Kind Property
(Boot) 11-26
Research and Experimentation
Expenditures 10-36 Reporting Like-Kind Exchanges 11-28
Patents and Copyrights 10-36 Involuntary Conversions 11-29
Amortizable Intangible Asset Summary 10-37 Installment Sales 11-31
Gains Ineligible for Installment
Depletion 10-38
Reporting 11-33
Conclusion 10-41 Other Nonrecognition Provisions 11-33
Appendix A: MACRS Tables 10-41 Related-Person Loss Disallowance
Rules 11-34
11 Property Dispositions Conclusion 11-35
Dispositions 11-2
Amount Realized 11-2
Determination of Adjusted Basis 11-2 12 Compensation
Gifts 11-3
Salary and Wages 12-2
Inherited Property 11-3
Employee Considerations for Salary and
Property Converted from Personal Use to
Wages 12-2
Business Use 11-3
Tax Withholding 12-2
Realized Gain or Loss on Disposition 11-5
Employer Considerations for Salary and
Recognized Gain or Loss on Disposition 11-6
Wages 12-2
Character of Gain or Loss 11-6 Deductibility of Salary and Wage
Ordinary Assets 11-7 Payments 12-2
Capital Assets 11-7 Equity-Based Compensation 12-7
Section 1231 Assets 11-8 Stock Options 12-9
Depreciation Recapture 11-9 Employee Tax Considerations for Stock
§1245 Property 11-10 Options 12-10
Scenario 1: Gain Created Solely through Cost Employer Tax Considerations for Stock
Recovery Deductions 11-11 Options 12-13
Scenario 2: Gain Due to Both Cost Recovery Restricted Stock 12-15
Deductions and Asset ­Appreciation 11-11 Employee Tax Considerations for Restricted
Scenario 3: Asset Sold at a Loss 11-12 Stock 12-16
§1250 Depreciation Recapture for Real Employer Tax Considerations for Restricted
Property 11-13 Stock 12-18
Other Provisions Affecting the Rate at Which Gains Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 12-18
Are Taxed 11-14 Equity-Based Compensation Summary 12-19
Unrecaptured §1250 Gain for Fringe Benefits 12-20
Individuals 11-14 Taxable Fringe Benefits 12-20
Characterizing Gains on the Sale of Depreciable Employee Considerations for Taxable Fringe
Property to Related Persons 11-16 Benefits 12-21
Calculating Net §1231 Gains or Losses 11-16 Employer Considerations for Taxable Fringe
§1231 Look-Back Rule 11-18 Benefits 12-23
Table of Contents xxxiii

Nontaxable Fringe Benefits 12-24 Individual Retirement Accounts 13-19


Group-Term Life Insurance 12-24 Traditional IRAs 13-19
Health and Accident Insurance and Contributions 13-19
Benefits 12-24 Nondeductible Contributions 13-22
Meals and Lodging for the Convenience of Distributions 13-23
the Employer 12-26 Roth IRAs 13-23
Employee Educational Assistance 12-26 Contributions 13-23
Dependent Care Benefits 12-26 Distributions 13-24
No-Additional-Cost Services 12-26 Rollover from Traditional to Roth IRA 13-25
Qualified Employee Discounts 12-27 Comparing Traditional and Roth IRAs 13-26
Working Condition Fringe Benefits 12-28
Self-Employed Retirement Accounts 13-27
De Minimis Fringe Benefits 12-29
Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) IRA 13-27
Qualified Transportation Fringe
Nontax Considerations 13-28
Benefits 12-29
Individual 401(k) Plans 13-28
Cafeteria Plans and Flexible Spending
Accounts (FSAs) 12-29 Nontax Considerations 13-30
Employee and Employer Considerations for Saver’s Credit 13-30
Nontaxable Fringe Benefits 12-30 Conclusion 13-31
Tax Planning with Fringe Benefits 12-30
Appendix A: Traditional IRA Deduction
Fringe Benefits Summary 12-32 Limitations 13-32
Conclusion 12-33 Appendix B: Roth IRA Contribution Limits 13-34

13 Retirement Savings and Deferred 14 Tax Consequences of Home Ownership


Compensation Personal Use of the Home 14-3
Employer-Provided Qualified Plans 13-3 Exclusion of Gain on Sale of Personal
Residence 14-4
Defined Benefit Plans 13-3
Requirements 14-5
Vesting 13-4
Home Mortgage Interest Deduction 14-8
Distributions 13-5
Limitation on Acquisition Indebtedness 14-9
Nontax Considerations 13-5
Points 14-11
Defined Contribution Plans 13-6 Real Property Taxes 14-13
Employer Matching 13-6
Rental Use of the Home 14-15
Contribution Limits 13-7
Residence with Minimal Rental Use 14-15
Vesting 13-7
Residence with Significant Rental Use (Vacation
After-Tax Cost of Contributions to Traditional Home) 14-16
(non-Roth) Defined Contribution
Nonresidence (Rental Property) 14-21
Plans 13-8
Losses on Rental Property 14-21
Distributions from Traditional Defined
Contribution Plans 13-9 Business Use of the Home 14-23
After-Tax Rates of Return for Traditional Defined Direct versus Indirect Expenses 14-25
Contribution Plans 13-11 Limitations on Deductibility of Expenses 14-26
Roth 401(k) Plans 13-11 Conclusion 14-28
Comparing Traditional Defined Contribution
Appendix A: Sample Settlement Statement for the
Plans and Roth 401(k) Plans 13-14
Jeffersons 14-30
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Appendix B: Flowchart of Tax Rules Relating to
Plans 13-15
Home Used for Rental Purposes 14-32
Nonqualified Plans versus Qualified Defined
Contribution Plans 13-15
Employee Considerations 13-16 15 Entities Overview
Employer Considerations 13-18 Entity Legal Classification and Nontax
Individually Managed Qualified Characteristics 15-2
Retirement Plans 13-18 Legal Classification 15-2
xxxiv Table of Contents

Nontax Characteristics 15-2 Calculating the Current and Deferred Income Tax
Responsibility for Liabilities 15-3 Expense or Benefit Components of a Company’s
Rights, Responsibilities, and Legal Income Tax Provision 17-6
Arrangements among Owners 15-3 Step 1: Adjust Pretax Net Income for All
Permanent Differences 17-6
Entity Tax Classification 15-5
Step 2: Identify All Temporary Differences
Entity Tax Characteristics 15-7
and Tax Carryforward Amounts 17-8
Taxation of Business Entity Income 15-7
Revenues or Gains That Are Taxable after
The Taxation of Flow-Through Entity Business They Are Recognized in Financial
Income 15-7 Income 17-8
Overall Tax Rate of C Corporation Expenses or Losses That Are Deductible
Income 15-11 after They Are Recognized in ­Financial
Owner Compensation 15-14 Income 17-8
Deductibility of Entity Losses 15-16 Revenues or Gains That Are Taxable before
Other Tax Characteristics 15-18 They Are Recognized in Financial
Converting to Other Entity Types 15-21 Income 17-9
Expenses or Losses That Are Deductible
Conclusion 15-23
before They Are Recognized in ­Financial
Income 17-9
16 Corporate Operations Identifying Taxable and Deductible Temporary
Differences 17-9
Corporate Taxable Income Formula 16-2 Taxable Temporary Difference 17-9
Accounting Periods and Methods 16-2 Deductible Temporary Difference 17-9
Computing Corporate Taxable Income 16-3 Step 3: Compute the Current Income Tax
Book–Tax Differences 16-3 Expense or Benefit 17-11
Common Permanent Book–Tax Step 4: Determine the Ending Balances in the
Differences 16-4 Balance Sheet Deferred Tax Asset and
Common Temporary Book–Tax Liability Accounts 17-12
Differences 16-6 Determining Whether a Valuation
Corporate-Specific Deductions and Associated Allowance Is Needed 17-17
Book–Tax Differences 16-9 Step 5: Evaluate the Need for a Valuation
Stock Options 16-9 Allowance for Gross Deferred Tax
Net Capital Losses 16-12 Assets 17-17
Net Operating Losses 16-13 Determining the Need for a Valuation
Charitable Contributions 16-14 Allowance 17-17
Dividends Received Deduction 16-17 Future Reversals of Existing Taxable
Temporary Differences 17-17
Taxable Income Summary 16-21
Taxable Income in Prior Carryback
Corporate Income Tax Liability 16-21
Year(s) 17-18
Compliance 16-21 Expected Future Taxable Income Exclusive of
Consolidated Tax Returns 16-26 Reversing Temporary Differences and
Corporate Tax Return Due Dates and Estimated Carryforwards 17-18
Taxes 16-26 Tax Planning Strategies 17-18
Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax Credit Negative Evidence That a Valuation
Carryforwards 16-30 Allowance Is Needed 17-18
Conclusion 16-31 Step 6: Calculate the Deferred Income Tax
Expense or Benefit 17-21
Accounting for Uncertainty
17 Accounting for Income Taxes in Income Tax Positions 17-22
Objectives of Accounting for Income Taxes and the Application of ASC 740 to Uncertain Tax
Income Tax Provision Process 17-2 Positions 17-22
Why Is Accounting for Income Taxes So Step 1: Recognition 17-23
Complex? 17-3 Step 2: Measurement 17-23
Objectives of ASC 740 17-4 Subsequent Events 17-25
The Income Tax Provision Process 17-6 Interest and Penalties 17-25
Table of Contents xxxv

Disclosures of Uncertain Tax Positions 17-25 Stock Distributions 18-15


Schedule UTP (Uncertain Tax Position) Tax Consequences to Shareholders Receiving
Statement 17-26 a Stock Distribution 18-15
Financial Statement Disclosure and the Nontaxable Stock Distributions 18-15
Computation of a Corporation’s Effective Taxable Stock Distributions 18-16
Tax Rate 17-27 Stock Redemptions 18-16
Balance Sheet Classification 17-27 The Form of a Stock Redemption 18-17
Income Tax Footnote Disclosure 17-27 Redemptions That Reduce a Shareholder’s
Computation and Reconciliation of the Ownership Interest 18-18
Income Tax Provision with a Company’s Redemptions That Are Substantially
Hypothetical Tax Provision 17-27 Disproportionate 18-18
Importance of a Corporation’s Effective Tax Complete Redemption of the Stock Owned
Rate 17-30 by a Shareholder 18-21
Interim Period Effective Tax Rates 17-30 Redemptions That Are Not Essentially
Accounting for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Equivalent to a Dividend 18-22
Act 17-30 Tax Consequences to the Distributing
FASB Projects Related to Accounting for Income Corporation 18-24
Taxes 17-31 Trends in Stock Redemptions by Publicly Traded
Conclusion 17-31 Corporations 18-24
Partial Liquidations 18-25
18 Corporate Taxation: Nonliquidating Conclusion 18-26
Distributions
Taxation of Property Distributions 18-2
19 Corporate Formation, Reorganization,
Determining the Dividend Amount from Earnings
and Liquidation
and Profits 18-3 Review the Taxation of Property
Overview 18-3 Dispositions 19-2
Dividends Defined 18-3 Tax-Deferred Transfers of Property
Computing Earnings and Profits 18-4 to a Corporation 19-4
Nontaxable Income Included in Transactions Subject to Tax Deferral 19-5
Current E&P 18-4 Meeting the Section 351 Tax Deferral
Deductible Expenses That Do Not Reduce Requirements 19-5
Current E&P 18-5 Section 351 Applies Only to the Transfer of
Nondeductible Expenses That Reduce Property to the Corporation 19-5
Current E&P 18-5 The Property Transferred to the Corporation
Items Requiring Separate Accounting Must Be Exchanged for Stock of the
Methods for E&P Purposes 18-5 Corporation 19-6
Ordering of E&P Distributions 18-8 The Transferor(s) of Property to the
Positive Current E&P and Positive Corporation Must Be in Control of the
Accumulated E&P 18-8 Corporation, in the Aggregate, Immediately
Positive Current E&P and Negative after the Transfer 19-6
Accumulated E&P 18-9 Tax Consequences to Shareholders 19-9
Negative Current E&P and Positive Tax Consequences When a Shareholder
Accumulated E&P 18-9 Receives Boot 19-10
Negative Current E&P and Negative Assumption of Shareholder Liabilities by the
Accumulated E&P 18-10 Corporation 19-12
Distributions of Noncash Property to Tax-Avoidance Transactions 19-12
Shareholders 18-11 Liabilities in Excess of Basis 19-12
The Tax Consequences to a Corporation Tax Consequences to the Transferee
Paying Noncash Property as a Corporation 19-14
­Dividend 18-12 Other Issues Related to Incorporating an
Liabilities 18-12 Ongoing Business 19-17
Effect of Noncash Property Distributions Depreciable Assets Transferred to a
on E&P 18-13 Corporation 19-17
xxxvi Table of Contents

Contributions to Capital 19-18 Ordinary Business Income (Loss) and Separately


Section 1244 Stock 19-18 Stated Items 20-17
Taxable and Tax-Deferred Corporate Guaranteed Payments 20-19
Acquisitions 19-20 Self-Employment Tax 20-20
The Acquisition Tax Model 19-21 Limitation on Business Interest
Expense 20-22
Tax Consequences to a Corporate
Acquisition 19-22 Deduction for Qualified Business
Income 20-22
Taxable Acquisitions 19-23
Net Investment Income Tax 20-23
Tax-Deferred Acquisitions 19-26
Allocating Partners’ Shares of Income and
Judicial Principles That Underlie All
Loss 20-23
Tax-Deferred Reorganizations 19-26
Partnership Compliance Issues 20-24
Continuity of Interest (COI) 19-26
Continuity of Business Enterprise Partner’s Adjusted Tax Basis
(COBE) 19-26 in Partnership Interest 20-28
Business Purpose Test 19-26 Cash Distributions in Operating
Partnerships 20-30
Type A Asset Acquisitions 19-27
Forward Triangular Type A Merger 19-29 Loss Limitations 20-30
Reverse Triangular Type A Merger 19-29 Tax-Basis Limitation 20-30
Type B Stock-for-Stock Reorganizations 19-30 At-Risk Limitation 20-31
Passive Activity Loss Limitation 20-32
Complete Liquidation of a Corporation 19-33
Passive Activity Defined 20-33
Tax Consequences to the Shareholders
in a Complete Liquidation 19-34 Income and Loss Baskets 20-34
Tax Consequences to the Liquidating Excess Business Loss Limitation 20-35
Corporation in a Complete Conclusion 20-36
Liquidation 19-35
Taxable Liquidating Distributions 19-35 21 Dispositions of Partnership Interests
Nontaxable Liquidating Distributions 19-38 and Partnership Distributions
Conclusion 19-39
Basics of Sales of Partnership
Interests 21-2
Seller Issues 21-3
20 Forming and Operating Hot Assets 21-3
Partnerships Buyer and Partnership Issues 21-7
Varying Interest Rule 21-8
Flow-Through Entities Overview 20-2
Aggregate and Entity Concepts 20-2 Basics of Partnership Distributions 21-9
Operating Distributions 21-9
Partnership Formations and Acquisitions
of Partnership Interests 20-3 Operating Distributions of Money
Only 21-9
Acquiring Partnership Interests When
Partnerships Are Formed 20-3 Operating Distributions That Include
Property Other Than Money 21-10
Contributions of Property 20-3
Liquidating Distributions 21-12
Contribution of Services 20-9
Gain or Loss Recognition in Liquidating
Organizational, Start-Up, and Syndication
Distributions 21-13
Costs 20-12
Basis in Distributed Property 21-13
Acquisitions of Partnership Interests 20-13
Partner’s Outside Basis Is Greater
Partnership Accounting: Tax Elections, Accounting Than Inside Bases of Distributed
Periods, and Accounting Methods 20-13 Assets 21-14
Tax Elections 20-14 Partner’s Outside Basis Is Less Than
Accounting Periods 20-14 Inside Bases of Distributed
Required Year-Ends 20-14 Assets 21-17
Accounting Methods 20-16 Character and Holding Period of
Reporting the Results of Partnership Distributed Assets 21-21
Operations 20-17 Disproportionate Distributions 21-24
Table of Contents xxxvii

Special Basis Adjustments 21-26 Excess Net Passive Income Tax 22-24
Special Basis Adjustments for LIFO Recapture Tax 22-26
Dispositions 21-27 Estimated Taxes 22-28
Special Basis Adjustments for Filing Requirements 22-28
Distributions 21-28
Comparing C and S Corporations
Conclusion 21-29 and Partnerships 22-30
Conclusion 22-31
22 S Corporations
S Corporation Elections 22-2
23 State and Local Taxes
Formations 22-2
S Corporation Qualification State and Local Taxes 23-2
Requirements 22-2 Sales and Use Taxes 23-5
S Corporation Election 22-3 Sales Tax Nexus 23-5
S Corporation Terminations 22-5 Sales Tax Liability 23-7
Voluntary Terminations 22-5 Income Taxes 23-9
Involuntary Terminations 22-5 Income Tax Nexus 23-10
Failure to Meet Requirements 22-5 Public Law 86-272 23-10
Excess of Passive Investment Nexus for Nonincome-Based Taxes 23-13
Income 22-6
Economic Income Tax Nexus 23-13
Short Tax Years 22-6
Entities Included on Income Tax Return 23-15
S Corporation Reelections 22-7
Separate Tax Returns 23-15
Operating Issues 22-8 Unitary Tax Returns 23-15
Accounting Methods and Periods 22-8 State Taxable Income 23-16
Income and Loss Allocations 22-8 Dividing State Tax Base among States 23-18
Separately Stated Items 22-9 Business Income 23-18
Shareholder’s Basis 22-11 Nonbusiness Income 23-24
Initial Basis 22-11 State Income Tax Liability 23-24
Annual Basis Adjustments 22-12 Nonincome-Based Taxes 23-25
Loss Limitations 22-13 Conclusion 23-25
Tax-Basis Limitation 22-13
At-Risk Limitation 22-14
Post-Termination Transition Period Loss 24 The U.S. Taxation of Multinational
Limitation 22-14 Transactions
Passive Activity Loss Limitation 22-15
The U.S. Framework for Taxing Multinational
Excess Business Loss Limitation 22-15 Transactions 24-2
Self-Employment Income 22-15 U.S. Taxation of a Nonresident 24-3
Net Investment Income Tax 22-16 Definition of a Resident for U.S. Tax
Fringe Benefits 22-16 Purposes 24-4
Distributions 22-17 Overview of the U.S. Foreign Tax Credit
Operating Distributions 22-17 System 24-5
S Corporation with No C Corporation U.S. Source Rules for Gross Income
Accumulated Earnings and Profits 22-17 and Deductions 24-6
S Corporation with C Corporation Source of Income Rules 24-7
Accumulated Earnings and Profits 22-18 Interest 24-7
Property Distributions 22-20 Dividends 24-8
Post-Termination Transition Period Compensation for Services 24-8
Distributions 22-21 Rents and Royalties 24-10
Liquidating Distributions 22-21 Gain or Loss from Sale of Real
S Corporation Taxes and Filing Property 24-10
Requirements 22-22 Gain or Loss from Sale of Purchased
Built-in Gains Tax 22-22 Personal Property 24-10
xxxviii Table of Contents

Source of Deduction Rules 24-11 Taxable Gifts 25-9


General Principles of Allocation and Gift-Splitting Election 25-10
Apportionment 24-11 Marital Deduction 25-10
Special Apportionment Rules 24-12 Charitable Deduction 25-12
Operating Abroad through a Foreign Computation of the Gift Tax 25-12
Corporation 24-13 Tax on Current Taxable Gifts 25-13
Foreign-Derived Intangible Income 24-16 Applicable Credit 25-14
Treaties 24-17 The Federal Estate Tax 25-17
Foreign Tax Credits 24-19 The Gross Estate 25-17
FTC Limitation Categories of Taxable Specific Inclusions 25-18
Income 24-19
Valuation 25-21
Passive Category Income 24-19
Gross Estate Summary 25-22
Foreign Branch Income 24-20
The Taxable Estate 25-22
General Category Income 24-20
Administrative Expenses, Debts, Losses, and
Creditable Foreign Taxes 24-20 State Death Taxes 25-23
Direct Taxes 24-21 Marital and Charitable Deductions 25-23
In Lieu of Taxes 24-21 Computation of the Estate Tax 25-25
Planning for International Operations 24-21 Adjusted Taxable Gifts 25-25
Check-the-Box Hybrid Entities 24-22 Applicable Credit 25-26
U.S. Anti-Deferral Rules 24-23 Wealth Planning Concepts 25-29
Definition of a Controlled Foreign The Generation-Skipping Tax 25-29
Corporation 24-24
Income Tax Considerations 25-29
Definition of Subpart F Income 24-25
Transfer Tax Planning Techniques 25-30
Planning to Avoid Subpart F Income 24-27
Serial Gifts 25-30
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Initiatives around The Step-Up in Tax Basis 25-31
the World 24-29
Integrated Wealth Plans 25-32
Conclusion 24-29
Conclusion 25-33

25 Transfer Taxes and Wealth Planning


Appendix A Tax Forms A-1
Introduction to Federal Transfer Taxes 25-2
Appendix B Tax Terms Glossary B
Beginnings 25-2
Common Features of Integrated Transfer Appendix C 
Comprehensive Tax Return
Taxes 25-2 Problems C1
The Federal Gift Tax 25-4 Appendix D Tax Rates D
Transfers Subject to Gift Tax 25-5
Code Index CI
Valuation 25-6
The Annual Exclusion 25-8 Subject Index SI-1
McGraw-Hill’s

Taxation of Individuals
and Business Entities
chapter

1 An Introduction to Tax

Learning Objectives

Upon completing this chapter, you should be able to:

LO 1-1 Demonstrate how taxes influence basic business, investment, personal, and political
decisions.

LO 1-2 Discuss what constitutes a tax and the general objectives of taxes.

LO 1-3 Describe the different tax rate structures and calculate a tax.

LO 1-4 Identify the various federal, state, and local taxes.

LO 1-5 Apply appropriate criteria to evaluate alternative tax systems.


Storyline Summary
Taxpayer: Margaret

Employment status: Margaret is a full-time student at


the University of Georgia.

Current situation: She is beginning her first


tax class.

©Andrew Rich/Getty Images

M
argaret is a junior beginning her first the IRS is evil and that the current tax system is bla-
tax course. She is excited about her tantly unfair and corrupt. He advocates a simpler,
­career prospects as an accounting major fairer way of taxation. Margaret is intrigued by Eddy’s
but hasn’t had much exposure to taxes. On her way to passion but questions whether he has a complete un-
campus she runs into an old friend, Eddy, who is go- derstanding of the U.S. tax system. She decides to
ing to Washington, D.C., to protest recent proposed withhold all judgments about it (or about pursuing a
changes to the U.S. tax system. Eddy is convinced career in taxation) until the end of her tax course. ■

1-1
1-2 CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Tax

LO 1-1 WHO CARES ABOUT TAXES AND WHY?


A clear understanding of the role of taxes in everyday decisions will help you make an
informed decision about the value of studying taxation or pursuing a career in taxa-
tion. One view of taxation is that it represents an inconvenience every April 15th (the
annual due date for filing federal individual tax returns without extensions). However,
the role of taxation is much more pervasive than this view suggests. Your study of this
subject will provide you a unique opportunity to develop an informed opinion about
taxation. As a business student, you can overcome the mystery that encompasses pop-
ular impressions of the tax system and perhaps, one day, share your expertise with
friends or clients.
What are some common decisions you face that taxes may influence? In this
course, we alert you to situations in which you can increase your return on invest-
ments by up to one-third! Even the best lessons in finance courses can’t approach the
increase in risk-adjusted return that smart tax planning provides. Would you like to
own your home someday? Tax deductions for home mortgage interest and real estate
taxes can reduce the after-tax costs of owning a home relative to renting. Thus, when
you face the decision to buy or rent, you can make an informed choice if you under-
stand the relative tax advantages of home ownership. Would you like to retire some-
day? Understanding the tax-advantaged methods of saving for retirement can increase
the after-tax value of your retirement nest egg—and thus increase the likelihood that
you can afford to retire, and do so in style. Other common personal financial deci-
sions that taxes influence include: choosing investments, evaluating alternative job
offers, saving for education expenses, and doing gift or estate planning. Indeed, taxes
are a part of everyday life and have a significant effect on many of the personal finan-
cial decisions all of us face.
The role of taxes is not limited to personal finance. Taxes play an equally important
role in fundamental business decisions such as the following:
∙ What organizational form should a business use?
∙ Where should the business locate?
∙ How should business acquisitions be structured?
∙ How should the business compensate employees?
∙ What is the appropriate mix of debt and equity for the business?
∙ Should the business rent or own its equipment and property?
∙ How should the business distribute profits to its owners?
Savvy business decisions require owners and managers to consider all costs and ben-
efits in order to evaluate the merits of a transaction. Although taxes don’t necessarily
dominate these decisions, they do represent large transaction costs that businesses should
factor into the financial decision-making process.
Taxes also play a major part in the political process. U.S. presidential candidates
­often distinguish themselves from their opponents based upon their tax rhetoric. Indeed,
the major political parties generally have very diverse views of the appropriate way to tax
the public.1 Determining who is taxed, what is taxed, and how much is taxed are tough
questions with nontrivial answers. Voters must have a basic understanding of taxes to
evaluate the merits of alternative tax proposals. Later in this chapter, we’ll introduce cri-
teria you can use to evaluate alternative tax proposals.

1
The U.S. Department of the Treasury provides a “history of taxation” on its website (www.treasury.gov/­
resource-center/faqs/Taxes/Pages/historyrooseveltmessage.aspx). You may find it interesting to read this
­history in light of the various political parties in office at the time.
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Tax 1-3

TAXES IN THE REAL WORLD Tax Policy: Republicans versus Democrats


Oliver Wendell Holmes said “taxes are the price we of taxes. Democrats will claw back tax breaks for
pay to live in a civilized society.” Both Democrats companies that ship jobs overseas, eliminate tax
and Republicans desire the same things: a civilized breaks for big oil and gas companies, and crack
society and a healthy economy. However, neither down on inversions and other methods com­
party can agree on what defines a civilized society panies use to dodge their tax responsibilities . . .
or which path best leads to a healthy economy. The We will then use the revenue raised from fixing
U.S. national debt is $20 trillion dollars and growing, the corporate tax code to reinvest in rebuilding
yet the only thing we might agree on is that some- America and ensuring economic growth that will
thing has gone wrong. Regardless of which party or lead to millions of good-paying jobs.”
candidate you support, each party’s agenda will “We will ensure those at the top contribute
­affect your income and taxes in various ways. to our country’s future by establishing a multi-
To explore the divide, let’s examine excerpts millionaire surtax to ensure millionaires and bil-
from each party’s National Platform from our most lionaires pay their fair share. In addition, we will
recent presidential election (2016). shut down the “private tax system” for those at
the top, immediately close egregious loopholes
Republicans like those enjoyed by hedge fund managers,
“We are the party of a growing economy that restore fair taxation on multimillion dollar es-
gives everyone a chance in life, an opportunity to tates, and ensure millionaires can no longer
learn, work, and realize the prosperity freedom pay a lower rate than their secretaries. At a
makes possible.” time of near-record corporate profits, slow
“Government cannot create prosperity, wage growth, and rising costs, we need to offer
though government can limit or destroy it. Pros- tax relief to middle-class families—not those at
perity is the product of self-discipline, enterprise, the top.”
saving and investment by individuals, but it is not “We will offer tax relief to hard working, middle-­
an end in itself. Prosperity provides the means by class families for the cost squeeze they have
which citizens and their families can maintain faced for years from rising health care, childcare,
their independence from government, raise their education, and other expenses.” https://www.
children by their own values, practice their faith, democrats.org/party-platform#preamble
and build communities of cooperation and mu-
tual respect.” Conclusion
“Republicans consider the establishment of a Each party fundamentally believes the govern-
pro-growth tax code a moral imperative. More ment should create/maintain cities and states that
than any other public policy, the way government form a civilized society, and that government
raises revenue—how much, at what rates, under should foster a healthy economy. However, they
what circumstances, from whom, and for whom— choose very different paths to reach this objec-
has the greatest impact on our economy’s perfor- tive. Democrats want to raise taxes on the
mance. It powerfully influences the level of wealthy and create government programs which
economic growth and job creation, which trans- cost more money, while Republicans wish to
lates into the level of opportunity for those who lower taxes and decrease government size and
would otherwise be left behind.” spending. Both motives are pure; however, cur-
“A strong economy is one key to debt reduc- rent and cumulative deficits indicate that current
tion, but spending restraint is a necessary compo- revenue is insufficient to meet government
nent that must be vigorously pursued.” https://www. spending. Solving these problems will require
gop.com/platform/restoring-the-american-dream/ civil discourse, education and research/informa-
tion in order to find realistic, effective solutions.
Democrats
Republicans: https://www.gop.com/platform/restoring-the-
“At a time of massive income and wealth in- american-dream/
equality, we believe the wealthiest Americans Democrats: https://www.democrats.org/party-platform#
and largest corporations must pay their fair share preamble

In summary, taxes affect many aspects of personal, business, and political decisions.
Developing a solid understanding of taxation should allow you to make informed decisions
in these areas. Thus, Margaret can take comfort that her semester will likely prove useful to
her personally. Who knows? Depending on her interest in business, investment, retirement
planning, and the like, she may ultimately decide to pursue a career in taxation.
1-4 CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Tax

LO 1-2 WHAT QUALIFIES AS A TAX?


“Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
THE KEY FACTS Taxes have been described in many terms: some positive, some negative, some print-
What Qualifies able, some not. Let’s go directly to a formal definition of a tax, which should prove useful
as a Tax? in identifying alternative taxes and discussing alternative tax systems.
• The general purpose of A tax is a payment required by a government that is unrelated to any specific benefit
taxes is to fund government
agencies.
or service received from the government. The general purpose of a tax is to fund the op-
• Unlike fines or penalties,
erations of the government (to raise revenue). Taxes differ from fines and penalties in that
taxes are not meant to taxes are not intended to punish or prevent illegal behavior. Nonetheless, by allowing
­punish or prevent illegal deductions from income, our federal tax system does encourage certain behaviors like
behavior; however, “sin charitable contributions, retirement savings, and research and development. Thus, we
taxes” are meant to dis- can view it as discouraging other legal behavior. For example, sin taxes impose rela-
courage some behaviors.
tively high surcharges on alcohol and tobacco products.2 Cigarette taxes include a $1.01
• To qualify as a tax, three
criteria must be met. The
per pack federal tax, a state tax in all 50 states, and also a few municipal taxes as well.3
payment must be: Key components of the definition of a tax are that the payment is:
• Required; ∙ Required (it is not voluntary);
• Imposed by a
∙ Imposed by a government agency (federal, state, or local); and
government; and
• Not tied directly to the ∙ Not tied directly to the benefit received by the taxpayer.
benefit received by the
taxpayer.
This last point is not to say that taxpayers receive no benefits from the taxes they pay.
They benefit from national defense, a judicial system, law enforcement, government-­
sponsored social programs, an interstate highway system, public schools, and many other
government-provided programs and services. The distinction is that taxes paid are not directly
related to any specific benefit received by the taxpayer. For example, the price of admission
to Yellowstone National Park is a fee rather than a tax because a specific benefit is received.
Can taxes be assessed for special purposes, such as a 1 percent sales tax for educa-
tion? Yes. Why is an earmarked tax, a tax that is assessed for a specific purpose, still
considered a tax? Because the payment made by the taxpayer does not directly relate to
the specific benefit received by the taxpayer.

Example 1-1
Margaret travels to Birmingham, Alabama, where she rents a hotel room and dines at several restau-
rants. The price she pays for her hotel room and meals includes an additional 2 percent city surcharge
to fund roadway construction in Birmingham. Is this a tax?
Answer: Yes. The payment is required by a local government and does not directly relate to a specific
benefit that Margaret receives.

Example 1-2
Margaret’s parents, Bill and Mercedes, recently built a house and were assessed $1,000 by their
county government to connect to the county sewer system. Is this a tax?
Answer: No. The assessment was mandatory and it was paid to a local government. However, the
third criterion was not met since the payment directly relates to a specific benefit (sewer service) re-
ceived by the payees. For the same reason, tolls, parking meter fees, and annual licensing fees are
also not considered taxes.

2
Sin taxes represent an interesting confluence of incentives. On the one hand, demand for such products as
alcohol, tobacco, and gambling is often relatively inelastic because of their addictive quality. Thus, taxing
such a product can raise substantial revenues. On the other hand, one of the arguments for sin taxes is fre-
quently the social goal of reducing demand for such products.
3
Federal excise taxes on cigarettes are found in §5701(b). State taxes are as much as $4.35 per pack in
New York, Anchorage, New York City, and Chicago impose municipal taxes as well.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
HERODOTUS’ PUDDING.

(A Genuine Classical Receipt.)


“Prepare and mix in the usual manner one pound of fine raisins
stoned, one pound of minced beef-suet, half a pound of bread-
crumbs, four figs chopped small, two tablespoonsful of moist sugar
(honey, in the original), two wineglassesful of sherry, and the rind of
half a large lemon (grated). Boil the pudding for fourteen hours.”
Obs.—This receipt is really to be found in Herodotus. The only
variations made in it are the substitution of sugar for honey, and
sherry for the wine of ancient Greece. We are indebted for it to an
accomplished scholar, who has had it served at his own table on
more than one occasion; and we have given it on his authority,
without testing it: but we venture to suggest that seven hours would
boil it quite sufficiently.
THE PUBLISHER’S PUDDING.

This pudding can scarcely be made too rich. First blanch, and then
beat to the smoothest possible paste, six ounces of fresh Jordan
almonds, and a dozen bitter ones; pour very gradually to them, in the
mortar, three quarters of a pint of boiling cream; then turn them into a
cloth, and wring it from them again with strong expression. Heat a
full half pint of it afresh, and pour it, as soon as it boils, upon four
ounces of fine bread-crumbs, set a plate over, and leave them to
become nearly cold; then mix thoroughly with them four ounces of
maccaroons, crushed tolerably small; five of finely minced beef-suet,
five of marrow, cleared very carefully from fibre, and from the
splinters of bone which are sometimes found in it, and shred not very
small, two ounces of flour, six of pounded sugar, four of dried
cherries, four of the best Muscatel raisins, weighed after they are
stoned, half a pound of candied citron, or of citron and orange rind
mixed, a quarter saltspoonful of salt, half a nutmeg, the yolks only of
seven full-sized eggs, the grated rind of a large lemon, and last of all,
a glass of the best Cognac brandy, which must be stirred briskly in
by slow degrees. Pour the mixture into a thickly buttered mould or
basin, which contains a full quart, fill it to the brim, lay a sheet of
buttered writing-paper over, then a well-floured cloth, tie them
securely, and boil the pudding for four hours and a quarter; let it
stand for two minutes before it is turned out; dish it carefully, and
serve it with the German pudding-sauce of page 403.
Jordan almonds, 6 oz.; bitter almonds, 12; cream, 3/4 pint; bread-
crumbs, 4 oz.; cream wrung from almonds, 1/2 pint; crushed
macaroons, 4 oz.; flour 2 oz.; beef-suet, 5 oz.; marrow, 5 oz.; dried
cherries, 4 oz.; stoned Muscatel raisins, 4 oz.; pounded sugar, 6 oz.;
candied citron (or citron and orange-rind mixed), 1/2 lb.; pinch of salt;
1/2 nutmeg; grated rind, 1 lemon; yolks of eggs, 7; best cognac, 1
wineglassful; boiled in mould or basin,: 4-1/4 hours.
Obs.—This pudding, which, if well made, is very light as well as
rich, will be sufficiently good for most tastes without the almonds:
when they are omitted, the boiling cream must be poured at once to
the bread-crumbs.
HER MAJESTY’S PUDDING.

Infuse in a pint of new milk half a pod of vanilla, cut into short
lengths, and bruised; simmer them gently together for twenty
minutes, and strain the milk through muslin to half a pint of cream;
put these again on the fire in a clean saucepan, with three ounces of
fine sugar, and pour them when they boil, to the beaten yolks of eight
very fresh eggs. Stir the mixture often until it is nearly or quite cold,
and boil it as gently as possible for an hour in a well-buttered mould
or basin that will just hold it. Let it stand for five minutes at least
before it is turned out; dish it carefully, strew, and garnish it thickly
with branches of preserved barberries, or send it to table with a rich
syrup of fresh fruit, or with clear fruit-jelly, melted. We have had often
a compôte (see Sweet Dishes, page 153) of currants, cherries, or
plums served, and greatly relished with this pudding, which we can
recommend to our readers as an extremely delicate one. The
flavouring may be varied with bitter almonds, lemon-rind, noyau, or
aught else which may be better liked than the vanilla.
New milk, 1 pint; vanilla, 1/2 pod: 20 minutes Cream, 1/2 pint;
sugar, 3 oz.; yolks of eggs, 8: 1 hour.
Obs.—The cook must be reminded that unless the eggs be stirred
briskly as the boiling milk is gradually poured to them, they will be
likely to curdle. A buttered paper should always be put over the basin
before the cloth is tied on, for all custard puddings.
COMMON CUSTARD PUDDING.

Whisk three eggs well, put them into a pint basin, and add to them
sufficient milk to fill it: then strain, flavour, and sweeten it with fine
sugar; boil the pudding very softly for an exact half hour, let it stand a
few minutes, dish, and serve it with sugar sifted over, and sweet
sauce in a tureen, or send stewed gooseberries, currants, or cherries
to table with it. A small quantity of lemon-brandy, or of ratifia can be
added, to give it flavour, when it is made, or the sugar with which it is
sweetened may be rasped on a lemon or an orange, then crushed
and dissolved in the milk; from an ounce and a half to two ounces
will be sufficient for general taste.
PRINCE ALBERT’S PUDDING.

Beat to a cream half a pound of fresh butter and mix with it by


degrees an equal weight of pounded loaf-sugar, dried and sifted; add
to these, after they have been well beaten together, first the yolks,
and then the whites of five fresh eggs, which have been thoroughly
whisked apart; now strew lightly in, half a pound of the finest flour,
dried and sifted, and last of all, half a pound of jar raisins, weighed
after they are stoned. Put these ingredients, perfectly mixed, into a
well-buttered mould, or floured cloth, and boil the pudding for three
hours. Serve it with punch sauce. We recommend a little pounded
mace, or the grated rind of a small lemon, to vary the flavour of this
excellent pudding; and that when a mould is used, slices of candied
peel should be laid rather thickly over it after it is buttered. Fresh
butter, pounded sugar, flour, stoned raisins, each 1/2 lb.; eggs, 5: 3
hours.
GERMAN PUDDING, AND SAUCE. (VERY GOOD.)

Stew, until very tender and dry, three ounces of whole rice in a pint
and a quarter of milk; when a little cooled, mix with it three ounces of
beef-suet finely chopped, two ounces and a half of sugar, an ounce
of candied orange or lemon-rind, six ounces of sultana raisins, and
three large eggs well beaten, and strained. Boil the pudding in a
buttered basin, or in a well-floured cloth, for two hours and a quarter,
and serve it with the following sauce:—Dissolve an ounce and a half
of sugar broken small in two glasses of sherry, or of any other white
wine, and stir them when quite hot, to the beaten yolks of three fresh
eggs; then stir the sauce in a small saucepan held high above the
fire until it resembles custard, but by no means allow it to boil, or it
will instantly curdle; pour it over the pudding, or, if preferred, send it
to table in a tureen. We think a full teaspoonful of lemon-juice added
to the wine an improvement to this sauce which is excellent; and we
can recommend the pudding to our readers.
Milk, 1-1/4 pint; rice, 3 oz.; 1 hour, or more. Suet, 3 oz.; sugar, 2-
1/2 oz.; candied peel, 1 oz.; sultana raisins, 6 oz.; eggs, 3 large: 2-
1/4 hours, Sauce: sherry, 2 glasses; sugar, 1-1/2 oz.; yolks of eggs,
3; little lemon-juice.
We have already, in a previous part of the volume, directed that
the German sauce should be milled to a fine froth, and poured upon
the pudding with which it is served: when this is not done, the
quantity should be increased.
THE WELCOME GUEST’S OWN PUDDING. (LIGHT AND
WHOLESOME.)

(Author’s Receipt.)
Pour, quite boiling, on four ounces of fine bread-crumbs, an exact
half-pint of new milk, or of thin cream; lay a plate over the basin and
let them remain until cold; then stir to them four ounces of dry
crumbs of bread, four of very finely minced beef-kidney suet, a small
pinch of salt, three ounces of coarsely crushed ratifias, three ounces
of candied citron and orange-rind sliced thin, and the grated rind of
one large or of two small lemons. Clear, and whisk four large eggs
well, throw to them by degrees four ounces of pounded sugar, and
continue to whisk them until it is dissolved, and they are very light;
stir them to, and beat them well up with the other ingredients; pour
the mixture into a thickly buttered mould, or basin which will contain
nearly a quart, and which it should fill to within half an inch of the
brim; lay first a buttered paper, then a well floured pudding-cloth over
the top, tie them tightly and very securely round, gather up and
fasten the corners of the cloth, and boil the pudding for two hours at
the utmost. Let it stand for a minute or two before it is dished, and
serve it with simple wine sauce, or with that which follows; or with
pine-apple or any other clear fruitsauce. (For these last, see page
405).
Boil very gently, for about ten minutes, a full quarter of a pint of
water, with the very thin rind of half a fresh lemon, and an ounce and
a half of lump sugar; then take out the lemon peel, and stir in a small
teaspoonful of arrow-root, smoothly mixed with the strained juice of
the lemon (with or without the addition of a little orange juice); take
the sauce from the fire, throw in nearly half a glass of pale French
brandy,[146] or substitute for this a large wineglassful of sherry, or of
any other white wine which may be preferred, but increase a little, in
that case, the proportion of arrow-root.
146. Maraschino, or any delicately flavoured liqueur, may be substituted for this
with much advantage.
To convert the preceding into Sir Edwin Landseer’s pudding,
ornament the mould tastefully with small leaves of thin citron-rind
and split muscatel raisins in a pattern, and strew the intermediate
spaces with well cleaned and well dried currants mingled with plenty
of candied orange or lemon-rind shred small. Pour gently in the
above pudding mixture, when quite cold, after having added one
egg-yolk to it, and steam or boil it the same length of time.
A CABINET PUDDING.

Split and stone three dozens of fine jar raisins, or take an equal
number of dried cherries, and place either of them regularly in a sort
of pattern, in a thickly-buttered plain quart mould or basin; next, slice
and lay into it three penny sponge-cakes; add to these two ounces of
ratifias, four macaroons, an ounce and a half of candied citron sliced
thin, the yolks of four eggs with the whites of three only, thoroughly
whisked, mixed with half a pint of new milk, then strained to half a
pint of sweet cream, and sweetened with two ounces and a half of
pounded sugar: these ought to fill the mould exactly. Steam the
pudding, or boil it very gently for one hour; let it stand a few minutes
before it is dished, that it may not break; and serve it with good wine
or brandy sauce.
Jar raisins, or dried cherries, 3 dozens (quart mould or basin);
sponge biscuits, 3; macaroons, 4; ratifias, 2 oz.; candied citron, 1-1/2
oz.; yolks of 4 eggs, whites of 3; new milk, 1/2 pint; cream, 1/2 pint;
sugar, 2-1/2 oz.; steamed, or boiled, 1 hour.
Obs.—We have given this receipt, for which we are indebted to a
friend, without any variation from the original, because on testing it
we have found it very exact with regard to quantity and time; but
though an extremely delicate and excellent pudding, a little
flavouring would, we think, improve it: a small portion of the milk may
be omitted, and its place supplied by ratifia, lemon-brandy, or aught
else that is preferred.
A VERY FINE CABINET PUDDING.

Butter thickly a mould of the same size as for the preceding


pudding, and ornament it tastefully with dried cherries, or with the
finest muscatel raisins opened and stoned; lay lightly into it a
quarter-pound of sponge biscuit cut in slices, and intermixed with an
equal weight of ratifias; sweeten with three ounces of sugar in lumps,
and flavour highly with vanilla, or with the thin rind of half a fine
lemon, and six sound bitter almonds bruised (should these be
preferred), three-quarters of a pint, or rather more, of thin cream, or
of cream and new milk mixed; strain and pour this hot to the well-
beaten yolks of six eggs and the whites of two, and when the mixture
is nearly cold, throw in gradually a wineglassful of good brandy; pour
it gently, and by degrees, into the mould, and steam or boil the
pudding very softly for an hour. Serve it with well made wine sauce.
Never omit a buttered paper over any sort of custard-mixture; and
remember that quick boiling will destroy the good appearance of this
kind of pudding. The liquid should be quite cold before it is added to
the cakes, or the butter on the mould would melt off, and the
decorations with it; preserved ginger, and candied citron in slices,
may be used to vary these, and the syrup of the former may be
added to give flavour to the other ingredients.
Dried cherries, 3 to 4 oz.; sponge-biscuits, 1/4 lb.; ratifias, 4 oz.;
thin cream, or cream and milk, 3/4 pint; sugar, 3 oz.; vanilla, 1/2 pod
(or thin rind of 1/2 lemon and 6 bitter almonds bruised); yolks of 6
eggs, whites of 2; brandy, 1 wineglassful (preserved ginger and
candied citron at choice): steamed, or gently boiled, 1 hour.
SNOWDON PUDDING.

(Genuine Receipt.)
Ornament a well buttered mould or basin with some fine raisins
split open and stoned, but not divided, pressing the cut side on the
butter to make them adhere; next, mix half a pound of very finely
minced beef-kidney suet, with half a pound of bread-crumbs, and an
ounce and a half of rice-flour, a pinch of salt, and six ounces of
lemon marmalade, or of orange when the lemon cannot be procured;
add six ounces of pale brown sugar, six thoroughly whisked eggs,
and the grated rinds of two lemons. Beat the whole until all the
ingredients are perfectly mixed, pour it gently into the mould, cover it
with a buttered paper and a floured cloth, and boil it for one hour and
a half. It will turn out remarkably well if carefully prepared. Half the
quantity given above will fill a mould or basin which will contain
rather more than a pint, and will be sufficiently boiled in ten minutes
less than an hour. To many tastes a slight diminution in the
proportion of suet would be an improvement to the pudding; and the
substitution of pounded sugar for the brown, might likewise be
considered so. Both the suet and eggs used for it, should be as fresh
as possible.
This pudding is constantly served to travellers at the hotel at the
foot of the mountain from which it derives its name. It is probably well
known to many of our readers in consequence. Wine sauce, arrow-
root, German sauce, or any other of the sweet pudding sauces to be
found in the preceding pages of this chapter, may be poured over, or
sent to table with it.
VERY GOOD RAISIN PUDDINGS.

To three quarters of a pound of flour add four ounces of fine


crumbs of bread, one pound of beef-suet, a pound and six ounces of
raisins, weighed after they are stoned, a quarter of a teaspoonful of
salt, rather more of ginger, half a nutmeg, an ounce and a half of
candied peel, and four large or five small eggs beaten, strained, and
mixed with a cupful of milk, or as much more as will make the whole
of the consistence of a very thick batter. Pour the mixture into a well-
floured cloth of close texture, which has previously been dipped into
hot water, wrung, and shaken out. Boil the pudding in plenty of water
for four hours and a half. It may be served with very sweet wine, or
punch sauce; but if made as we have directed, will be much lighter
than if sugar be mixed with the other ingredients before it is boiled;
and we have found it generally preferred to a richer plum-pudding.
No. 1. Flour, 3/4 lb.; bread-crumbs, 4 oz.; beef-suet, 1 lb.; stoned
raisins, 1 lb. 6 oz.; candied peel, 1-1/2 oz.; 1/2 nutmeg; eggs, 4
large, or 5 small; little salt and ginger: 4-1/2 hours.
Superior Raisin Pudding.—No. 2. Bread-crumbs and flour each 4
oz.; suet, 12 oz.; stoned raisins, 1 lb.; salt, third of saltspoonful; 1/2
nutmeg; ginger, 1/2 teaspoonful; half as much mace; sugar, 4 oz.;
candied citron or orange-rind, 2 oz.; eggs, 4; milk or brandy, 3 to 5
tablespoonsful: to be well mixed and beaten together and boiled 4
hours.
Obs.—The remains of this pudding will answer well for the receipt
which follows. Sultana raisins can be used for it instead of Malaga,
but they are not so sweet.
THE ELEGANT ECONOMIST’S PUDDING.

Butter thickly a plain mould or basin, and line it entirely with slices
of cold plum or raisin pudding, cut so as to join closely and neatly
together; fill it quite with a good custard; lay, first a buttered paper,
and then a floured cloth over it, tie them securely, and boil the
pudding gently for an hour; let it stand for ten minutes after it is taken
up before it is turned out of the mould. This is a more tasteful mode
of serving the remains of a plum-pudding than the usual one of
broiling them in slices, or converting them into fritters. The German
sauce, well milled or frothed, is generally much relished with sweet
boiled puddings, and adds greatly to their good appearance; but
common wine or punch sauce, may be sent to table with the above
quite as appropriately.
Mould or basin holding 1-1/2 pint, lined with thin slices of plum-
pudding; 3/4 pint new milk boiled gently 5 minutes with grain of salt,
5 bitter almonds, bruised; sugar in lumps, 2-1/2 oz.; thin rind of 1/2
lemon, strained and mixed directly with 4 large well-beaten eggs;
poured into mould while just warm; boiled gently 1 hour.
PUDDING À LA SCOONES.

Take of apples finely minced, and of currants, six ounces each; of


suet, chopped small, sultana raisins, picked from the stalks, and
sugar, four ounces each, with three ounces of fine bread-crumbs, the
grated rind, and the strained juice of a small lemon, three well-
beaten eggs, and two spoonsful of brandy. Mix these ingredients
perfectly, and boil the pudding for two hours in a buttered basin; sift
sugar over it when it is sent to table, and serve wine or punch sauce
apart.
INGOLDSBY CHRISTMAS PUDDINGS.

Mix very thoroughly one pound of finely-grated bread with the


same quantity of flour, two pounds of raisins stoned, two of currants,
two of suet minced small, one of sugar, half a pound of candied peel,
one nutmeg, half an ounce of mixed spice, and the grated rinds of
two lemons; mix the whole with sixteen eggs well beaten and
strained, and add four glasses of brandy. These proportions will
make three puddings of good size, each of which should be boiled
six hours.
Bread-crumbs, 1 lb.; flour, 1 lb.; suet, 2 lbs.; currants, 2 lbs.;
raisins, 2 lbs.; sugar, 1 lb.; candied peel, 1/2 lb.; rinds of lemons, 2;
nutmegs, 1; mixed spice, 1/2 oz.; salt, 1/4 teaspoonsful; eggs, 16;
brandy, 4 glassesful: 6 hours.
Obs.—A fourth part of the ingredients given above, will make a
pudding of sufficient size for a small party: to render this very rich,
half the flour and bread-crumbs may be omitted, and a few spoonsful
of apricot marmalade well blended with the remainder of the mixture.
[147]
147. Rather less liquid will be required to moisten the pudding when this is done,
and four hours and a quarter will boil it.
SMALL AND VERY LIGHT PLUM PUDDING.

With three ounces of the crumb of a stale loaf finely grated and
soaked in a quarter of a pint of boiling milk, mix six ounces of suet
minced very small, one ounce of dry bread-crumbs, ten ounces of
stoned raisins, a little salt, the grated rind of a china-orange, and
three eggs, leaving out one white. Boil the pudding for two hours and
serve it with very sweet sauce; put no sugar in it.
VEGETABLE PLUM PUDDING.

(Cheap and good.)


Mix well together one pound of smoothly-mashed potatoes, half a
pound of carrots boiled quite tender, and beaten to a paste, one
pound of flour, one of currants, and one of raisins (full weight after
they are stoned), three quarters of a pound of sugar, eight ounces of
suet, one nutmeg, and a quarter of a teaspoonful of salt. Put the
pudding into a well-floured cloth, tie it up very closely, and boil it for
four hours. The correspondent to whom we are indebted for this
receipt says, that the cost of the ingredients does not exceed half a
crown, and that the pudding is of sufficient size for a party of sixteen
persons. We can vouch for its excellence, but as it is rather apt to
break when turned out of the cloth, a couple of eggs would perhaps
improve it. It is excellent cold. Sweetmeats, brandy, and spices can
be added at pleasure.
Mashed potatoes, 1 lb.; carrots, 8 oz.; flour, 1 lb.; suet, 1/2 lb.;
sugar, 3/4 lb.; currants and raisins, 1 lb. each; nutmeg, 1; little salt. 4
hours.
THE AUTHOR’S CHRISTMAS PUDDING.

To three ounces of flour and the same weight of fine, lightly-grated


bread-crumbs, add six of beef kidney-suet, chopped small, six of
raisins weighed after they are stoned, six of well-cleaned currants,
four ounces of minced apples, five of sugar, two of candied orange
rind, half a teaspoonful of nutmeg mixed with pounded mace, a very
little salt, a small glass of brandy, and three whole eggs. Mix and
beat these ingredients well together, tie them tightly in a thickly-
floured cloth, and boil them for three hours and a half. We can
recommend this as a remarkably light small rich pudding: it may be
served with German, wine, or punch sauce.
Flour, 3 oz.; bread-crumbs, 3 oz.; suet, stoned raisins, and
currants, each, 6 oz.; minced apples, 4 oz.; sugar, 5 oz.; candied
peel, 2 oz.; spice, 1/2 teaspoonful; salt, few grains; brandy, small
wineglassful; eggs, 3; 3-1/2 hours.
A KENTISH WELL PUDDING.

Make into a firm smooth paste, with cold water, one pound of flour,
six ounces of finely-minced beef-suet, three quarters of a pound of
currants, and a small pinch of salt, thoroughly mixed together. Form
into a ball six ounces of good butter, and enclose it securely in about
a third of the paste (rolled to a half inch of thickness), in the same
way that an apple-dumpling is made; roll out the remainder of the
paste, and place the portion containing the butter in the centre of it,
with the part where the edge was drawn together turned downwards:
gather the outer crust round it, and after having moistened the edge,
close it with great care. Tie the pudding tightly in a well-floured cloth,
and boil it for two hours and a half. It must be dished with caution
that it may not break, and a small bit must be cut directly from the
top, as in a meat pudding. (See page 400).
This is a very favourite pudding in some parts of England; the only
difficulty in making or in serving it, is to prevent the escape of the
butter, which, if properly secured, will be found in a liquid state in the
inside, on opening it. Some timid cooks fold it in three coverings of
paste, the better to guard against its bursting through; but there is no
danger of this if the edges of the crust be well closed. When suet is
objected to, seven ounces of butter may be substituted for it. The
currants are occasionally omitted.
Flour, 1 lb.; suet, 6 oz.; currants, 3/4 lb.; salt, small pinch; ball of
butter 6 oz.: 2-1/2 hours.
ROLLED PUDDING.

Roll out thin a bit of light puff paste, or a good suet crust, and
spread equally over it to within an inch of the edge, any kind of fruit
jam. Orange marmalade, and mincemeat make excellent varieties of
this pudding, and a deep layer of fine brown sugar, flavoured with the
grated rind and strained juice of one very large, or of two small,
lemons, answers for it extremely well. Roll it up carefully, pinch the
paste together at the ends, fold a cloth round, secure it well at the
ends, and boil the pudding from one to two hours, according to its
size and the nature of the ingredients. Half a pound of flour made
into a paste with suet or butter, and covered with preserve, will be
quite sufficiently boiled in an hour and a quarter.

You might also like