Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASTRO 3
ASTRO 3
introductory astronomy
ASTRO3
Cha pter
Cha pter
STUDENT edition
Summaries & Take Quizzes
• Track Your Progress
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
THE PROCESS
YOUR
FEED-
4LTR Press uses a Student-Tested,
Faculty-Approved process to meet the
unique needs of each course.
BACK
Learn Astronomy YOUR Way with ASTRO3!
ASTRO3’s easy-reference, paperback textbook presents course
content through visually-engaging chapters as well as Chapter Review Cards
that consolidate the best review material into a ready-made study tool.
YOUR
With the textbook or on its own, ASTRO Online allows easy exploration
of ASTRO3 anywhere, anytime — including on your device!
BOOK
Students Say Instructors Require
Students taking ASTRO3 say they want an Those teaching Astronomy require a text that
overview of course concepts that are valuable provides a broad overview of astronomy, from the
and relate to the world around them. They desire origins of the discipline to current research in the
information that is timely, accurate, and easy field. In addition to relevant data and examples,
to understand. In ASTRO3 students can find instructors will have access to in-depth quizzing,
in-depth feature boxes, relevant examples, PowerPoint® lectures, and an Instructor’s Manual
up-to-date data, and much more. that includes additional material.
Our research never ends. Continual feedback from you ensures
that we keep up with your changing needs.
Student Resources: Instructor Resources
available at cengage.com/login:
• Visually-Engaging Chapters
• Tear-Out Chapter Review Cards • All Student Resources
• ASTRO Online available at cengagebrain.com • Assignable Chapter Readings and Assessments
• Interactive Reading • LMS Integration
• Practice Quizzes • Instructor’s Manual
• Astronomer Profiles • Test Bank
• Flashcards • PowerPoint® Slides
• Videos
• Tear-Out Instructor Prep Cards
• Pop Astronomy Features
• Discussion Questions
www.cengage.com/4ltrpress
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
THE ASTRO SOLUTION
Print
ASTRO3
CHA P TE R
Online
CHA P TE R
ASTRO3 delivers all the key ASTRO Online provides the complete
terms and core concepts for the narrative from the printed text with
Introductory Astronomy course. additional interactive media and the unique
functionality of StudyBits—all available
on nearly any device!
What is a StudyBit™? Created through a deep investigation of students’ challenges and workflows,
the StudyBit™ functionality of ASTRO Online enables students of different generations and learning
styles to study more effectively by allowing them to learn their way. Here’s how they work:
CORRECT
Track/Monitor
Progress
85% INCORRECT
Use Concept Personalize Quizzes
Tracker to decide Filter by your StudyBits
INCORRECT
how you’ll spend to personalize quizzes or
study time and just take chapter quizzes INCORRECT
study YOUR way! off-the-shelf.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
ASTRO3 © 2018, 2014 Cengage Learning®
Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman Unless otherwise noted, all content is © Cengage
Senior Vice President, General Manager: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the
Balraj Kalsi copyright herein may be reproduced or distributed in any form or
Product Manager: Clinton Kernen by any means, except as permitted by U.S. copyright law, without
the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
Content/Media Developer: Colin Grover
Product Assistant: Eli Lewis
For product information and technology assistance, contact us at
Marketing Manager: Heather Thompson Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
Sr. Content Project Manager: Martha For permission to use material from this text or product,
Conway submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions
Manufacturing Planner: Ron Montgomery Further permissions questions can be emailed to
permissionrequest@cengage.com
Sr. Art Director: Bethany Casey
Text Designer: Michael Stratton/ Stratton
Design Library of Congress Control Number: 2016960912
Cover Designer: Lisa Kuhn/ Curio Press, LLC Student Edition ISBN: 978-1-337-09751-2
Cover Image: Science Photo Library -
Student Edition with Online ISBN: 978-1-337-09750-5
VICTOR HABBICK VISIONS/Getty
Images Cengage Learning
Title Page and Back Cover Images: 20 Channel Center Street
Computer and tablet illustration: Boston, MA 02210
© iStockphoto.com/furtaev USA
Smart Phone illustration:
© iStockphoto.com/dashadima Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning
Feedback image: solutions with employees residing in nearly 40 different countries
© Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock.com and sales in more than 125 countries around the world. Find your
Design Image for How Do We Know: local representative at www.cengage.com.
© Suppakij1017/Shutterstock.com
Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by
Intellectual Property Analyst: Alexandra
Nelson Education, Ltd.
Ricciardi
Intellectual Property Project Manager: Reba To learn more about Cengage Learning Solutions, visit
Frederics www.cengage.com
Production Service: SPi Global
Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our
preferred online store www.cengagebrain.com
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
SEEDS/BACKMAN
ASTRO
3 BRIEF CONTENTS
PART 5 LIFE
15 Life on Other Worlds 348
Index 382
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
CONTENTS
Natali26/Shutterstock.com
2-1 The Stars 12
2-2 The Sky and Its Motions 16
2-3 The Cycle of the Sun 20
2-4 Cycles of the Moon 24
iv CONTENTS
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
5-3 The Sun’s Surface 84
5-4 Light, Matter, and Motion 85 Part 3
5-5 The Sun’s Atmosphere 90
5-6 Solar Activity 96
THE STARS
© Ann Muse/Shutterstock.com
6-2 Earth: The Active Planet 111
6-3 The Moon 117
6-4 Mercury 120
6-5 Venus 122
6-6 Mars 125
7-6 Pluto: Planet No More 153 9-5 Star Masses—Binary Stars 199
9-6 Typical Stars 204
CONTENTS v
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
11 The Deaths of Stars 238
13-3 The Evolution of Galaxies 305
13-4 Active Galaxies and Quasars 311
11-1 Giant Stars 239
11-2 Deaths of Low-Mass Stars 242
11-3 The Evolution of Binary Systems 247 14 Modern Cosmology 322
11-4 The Deaths of Massive Stars 249 14-1 Introduction to the Universe 322
11-6 Black Holes 262 14-3 Space and Time, Matter and Energy 332
14-4 Twenty-First-Century Cosmology 337
Part 4
THE UNIVERSE Part 5
OF GALAXIES LIFE
Suppakij1017/Shutterstock.com
creativemarc/Shutterstock.com
13 Galaxies: Normal
and Active 296
Appendix A: Units and Astronomical Data 368
Appendix B: Observing the Sky 373
13-1 The Family of Galaxies 296 Appendix C: Celestial Profiles 376
13-2 Measuring the Properties of Galaxies 297 Index 382
vi CONTENTS
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
SEEDS + BACKMAN
ASTRO
INTRODUCTORY ASTRONOMY
3
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Part 1
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Visual
© shooarts/Shutterstock.com
16 meters
Michael A. Seeds
Visual
USGS
Visual
This box ■ represents the relative size of the
previous frame.
will need to learn to use a wide range of “colors,” from you can see natural features of Earth’s surface: the
X-rays to radio waves, revealing sights invisible to your Allegheny Mountains of southern Pennsylvania crossing
unaided eyes. Photographs in this book generally have the picture at the upper left, and the Susquehanna River
labels noting which color or type of light was used to flowing southeast into Chesapeake Bay. What look like
make the image. white bumps are actually puffs of clouds. Mountains and
The college campus is now invisible, and the patches valleys are only temporary features on Earth that are slowly,
of gray are towns and cities, including Wilmington, but constantly, changing. As you explore the Universe, you
Delaware, visible in the lower right corner. At this scale, will come to see that it is also always evolving.
CHAPTER 1: Here and Now 3
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
In the next step of the journey, you will see the entire
planet Earth (Figure 1-4), which is about 13,000 km (8000
FIGURE 1-3
mi) in diameter. This picture shows most of the daylight
side of the planet; however, the blurriness at the extreme
right contains the sunset line. The rotation of Earth on its
axis each 24 hours carries you eastward, and as you cross
the sunset line into darkness you say that the Sun has set.
At the scale of this figure, the atmosphere on which your
NASA
ure has a diameter of 1.6 3 10 8 km. Now you see the
Sun and two other plan- This box ■ represents the relative size of the previous frame.
ets that are part of our
scientific notation A Solar System. The Solar
method for expressing very large System consists of the FIGURE 1-5
or very small numbers by using Sun, its family of planets,
powers of 10.
and some smaller bodies,
Solar System The Sun and all such as moons, asteroids,
the objects gravitationally bound and comets.
to it, including Earth, the other
planets plus their moons, asteroids,
Like Earth, Venus and
comets, and so on. Mercury are planets ,
small, nonluminous bod-
planets A nonluminous body in Earth Moon
orbit around a star, massive enough ies that shine by reflecting
to be spherical and to have cleared sunlight. Venus is about the Enlarged to show
its orbital zone of other objects. size of Earth, and Mercury relative sizes
supported by the internal pressure are both too small to be Earth Moon
of its hot gases, which generates
energy by nuclear fusion.
seen as anything but tiny
This box ■ represents the relative size of the previous frame.
dots. The Sun is a star, a
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
self-luminous ball of hot gas that generates its own energy. view now is 1 trillion (1012 ) times wider than in the first
The Sun is about 100 times larger in diameter than Earth figure. The details of the previous figure are lost in the
(inset), but it too is nothing more than a dot in this view. red square at the center of this figure. You see only the
Earth orbits the Sun once a year. brighter, more widely separated objects as you back away.
Another way astronomers simplify descriptions and The Sun, Mercury, Venus, and Earth are so close together
calculations using large numbers is to define new units. that you cannot separate them at this scale.
The average distance from Earth to the Sun is called the Mars, the next outward planet, lies only 1.5 AU
astronomical unit (AU), a distance of 1.5 3 10 8 km from the Sun. In contrast, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and
(93 million mi). Using that unit you can then say, for Neptune are so far from the Sun that they are easy to
example, that the average distance from Venus to the Sun find in this figure. Light from the Sun reaches Earth in
is about 0.7 AU. only 8 minutes, but it takes more than 4 hours to reach
Your first field of view was only about 16 m (52 ft) in Neptune. Pluto orbits mostly outside Neptune’s orbit, but
width. After just six steps, each enlarging by a factor of it is no longer considered a major planet.
100, you now see the entire Solar System, all the major When you again enlarge your view by a factor of 100,
planets, and their slightly elliptical orbits (Figure 1-7). Your the Solar System becomes invisibly small (Figure 1-8).
The Sun is only a point of light, and all the planets and
their slightly elliptical orbits are now crowded into the
FIGURE 1-6
small red square at the center. The planets are too small
and reflect too little light to be visible so near the bril-
liance of the Sun.
Sun
Venus Notice that no stars are visible in Figure 1-8 except
for the Sun. The Sun is a fairly typical star, a bit larger
than average, and it is located in a fairly normal neigh-
AU
borhood in the Universe. Although there are many bil-
1
Mercury lions of stars like the Sun, none is close enough to be
visible in this figure. The stars are separated by average
Enlarged to show
relative sizes distances about 30 times larger than this view, which has
Earth a diameter of 11,000 AU. It is difficult to grasp the isola-
Earth tion of the stars. If the Sun were represented by a golf
NASA
Sun ball in New York City, the nearest star would be another
golf ball in Chicago.
The small red box around Earth at lower left contains
the entire field of view of Figure 1-5. In Figure 1-9, your view has expanded to a diameter
a bit over 1.1 million AU. The Sun is at the center, and
you see a few of the nearest stars. These stars are so dis-
tant that it is not reasonable to give their distances in AU.
FIGURE 1-7 Astronomers have defined a new larger unit of distance,
the light-year. One light-year (ly) is the distance that
light travels in 1 year, roughly 1013 km or 63,000 AU. The
diameter of your view in Figure 1-9 is 17 ly. The near-
est star to the Sun, Proxima Centauri, is 4.2 ly away. In
other words, light from Proxima Centauri takes 4.2 years
to reach Earth.
Mars Although these stars
Jupiter are roughly the same size
Saturn
as the Sun, they are so far astronomical unit
Uranus (AU) Average distance from
away that you cannot see
Neptune Earth to the Sun; 1.5 3 108 km
them as anything but points
(93 million mi).
of light. Even with the larg-
est telescopes on Earth, you light-year (ly) Unit of distance
equal to the distance light travels
The small red box around the Sun at center contains still see only points of light in 1 year.
the entire field of view of Figure 1-6. when you look at stars, and
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
In Figure 1-10, you expand your field of view by
FIGURE 1-8 another factor of 100, and the Sun and its neighboring
stars vanish into the background of thousands of stars.
This figure is 1700 ly in diameter. Of course, no one has
ever journeyed thousands of light-years from Earth to
look back and photograph the Sun’s neighborhood, so this
is a representative picture from Earth of a portion of the
sky that can be used as a reasonable simulation. The Sun
Sun and Planets is faint enough that it would not be easily located in a
picture at this scale.
Some things that are invisible in this figure are actu-
ally critically important. You do not see the thin gas that
fills the spaces between the stars. Although those clouds
of gas are thinner than the best vacuum produced in labo-
ratories on Earth, it is those clouds that give birth to new
The small red box at the center contains the entire field stars. The Sun formed from such a cloud about 5 billion
of view of Figure 1-7. years ago. You will see more star formation in the next
figure.
If you expand your view again by a factor of 100,
FIGURE 1-9 you see our Galaxy (Figure 1-11). A galaxy is a great
cloud of stars, gas, and dust bound together by the
combined gravity of all the matter. In the night sky, you
see our Galaxy from the inside as a great, cloudy band
of stars ringing the sky as the Milky Way , and our
Galaxy is called the Milky Way Galaxy. How does
anyone know what the disk of the Milky Way Galaxy
Sun and would look like from a vantage point tens of thou-
Planets
sands of light years away? Astronomers use evidence
to guide their explanations as they envision what our
Galaxy looks like. Artists can then use those scientific
descriptions to create a painting. Our Sun would be
invisible in such a picture, but if you could see it, you
any planets that might circle those stars are much too
small and faint to be visible. In Figure 1-9 the sizes of
the dots represent not the sizes of the stars but their
brightness. This is stan-
dard practice in astronomi-
galaxy A large system of stars,
star clusters, gas, dust, and nebulae cal diagrams, and it is also
orbiting a common center of mass. how starlight is recorded.
Milky Way The hazy band of Bright stars make larger
light that circles our sky, produced spots in a photograph or
NASA
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
How Do We Know? 1-1
The Scientific Method
How do scientists learn about nature? You have more than 28,000 pea plants, noting which produced
probably heard of the scientific method as the process smooth peas and which produced wrinkled peas, and
by which scientists form hypotheses and test them how that trait—and others—were inherited by succes-
against evidence gathered by experiment and observa- sive generations. His studies confirmed his hypothesis
tion. Scientists use the scientific method all the time and allowed the development of a series of laws of
and it is critically important, but they rarely think of it. It inheritance. Although the importance of his work was
is such an ingrained way of thinking and understanding not recognized in his lifetime, Mendel is now called the
nature that it is almost invisible to “father of modern genetics”.
the people who use it most. The scientific method is not a
A hypothesis is a suggestion simple, mechanical way of grind-
NSphotostudio/Shutterstock.com
about how nature works, and the ing facts into understanding. It is
evidence is reality. If a hypothesis actually a combination of many
is compared to the evidence and ways of analyzing information,
confirmed, it must be tested fur- finding relationships, and creat-
ther; if it is contradicted, it must be ing new ideas. A scientist needs
discarded or revised. In that way, insight and ingenuity to form and
ideas get tested and refined to bet- test a good hypothesis. Scientists
ter describe how nature works. Whether peas are wrinkled or use the scientific method almost
For example, Gregor Mendel smooth is an inherited trait. automatically, forming, testing,
(1822–1884) was an Austrian abbot revising, and discarding hypothe-
who liked gardening. He formed ses sometimes minute-by-minute
a hypothesis that offspring usually inherit traits from as they discuss new ideas. The scientific method is a way
their parents not as a smooth blend, as most scientists of thinking and a way of knowing about nature. The
of the time believed, but as discrete units according to “How Do We Know?” essays in this book will introduce
strict mathematical rules. Mendel cultivated and tested you to some of the methods scientists use.
FIGURE 1-11 would find it about two-thirds of the way from the cen-
ter to the edge, at about the location of the marker dot
indicated in the figure. Our Galaxy contains more than
100 billion stars, and, like many others, has graceful
spiral arms winding outward through the disk. You
will discover in a later chapter that stars are born in
great clouds of gas and dust as they pass through the
spiral arms.
The visible portion of our Galaxy's disk is 80,000 ly
Mark A. Garlick/space-art.co.uk
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
larger than most. In fact, our Galaxy is only one of many over the origin of these structures, you are at the frontier
billions of galaxies scattered throughout the Universe. of human knowledge. The sequence of figures ends here
As you expand your field of view by another fac- because it has reached the limits of the best telescopes.
tor of 100, our Galaxy appears as a tiny luminous speck Humanity’s view does not extend as far as the region
surrounded by other specks (Figure 1-12). This figure that would be covered by a figure 100 times larger than
includes a region 17 million ly in diameter, and with each Figure 1-13.
dot representing a galaxy. Notice that our Galaxy is part of
a cluster of a few dozen galaxies. You will find that galax-
ies are commonly grouped together in clusters. Some of 1-2 WHEN IS NOW?
these galaxies have beautiful spiral patterns like our own
Galaxy, but others do not. One of the questions you will In later chapters, you will learn that the Universe began
investigate in a later chapter is what produces these dif- about 14 billion years ago. Since that time, galaxies have
ferences among the galaxies. formed, and generation after generation of stars have
Figure 1-13 represents a view with a diameter of 1.7 formed and died. Our Sun and its planets formed only
billion ly. It was made by combining observations with about 4.6 billion years ago. Humans have existed on
theoretical calculations. The figure shows clusters of gal- Earth for only about 4 million years. That is only 0.004
axies connected in a vast network. Clusters are grouped billion years. Human civilization has existed for only
into superclusters— clusters of clusters— and the 10,000 years (0.00001 billion years). Humanity is very
superclusters are linked to form long filaments and walls new to the Universe.
outlining voids that seem nearly empty of galaxies. These How could anyone possibly know these secrets of
filaments and walls appear to be the largest structures in nature? Science gives us a way to know how nature works.
the Universe. Throughout this book, you will find short essays titled
Were you to expand “How Do We Know?”; these essays are designed to help
your field of view one more you think not about what is known, but how it is known.
time, you would probably see To do that, they will explain a variety of scientific thought
superclusters A cluster of
galaxy clusters.
a uniform fog of filaments processes and procedures to help you understand how
and voids. When you puzzle scientists know about the natural world.
This box ■ represents the relative size of the previous This box ■ represents the relative size of the previous
frame. frame.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
What Are We? Participants
Astronomy will give you perspective on what it means Not only does astronomy locate you in space
to be here on Earth. This chapter has helped you and time, it places you in the physical processes that
locate yourself in space and time. Once you realize govern the Universe. Gravity and atoms work together
how vast our Universe is, Earth seems quite small, to make stars, light the Universe, generate energy,
and people on the other side of the world seem and create the chemical elements in your body. The
like neighbors. Furthermore, in the entire history chapters that follow will show you how you fit into
of the Universe, the human story is only a flicker of those cosmic processes.
an eye blink. This may seem humbling at first, but Although you are very small and your kind have
you can be proud of how much we humans have existed in the Universe for only a short time, you are an
understood in such a short time. important part of something very large and very beautiful.
STUDY
TOOLS 1 ASTRO ONLINE
Visit ASTRO Online at www.cengagebrain.com
◻ Interactive Reading
IN THE BOOK ◻ Practice Quizzing
◻ Tear Out the Review Card on Here and Now. ◻ Videos and Animations
◻ Exclusive Features
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Questions and 1
Problems
REVIEW QUESTIONS PROBLEMS
1. What is the largest dimension of which you have 1. The diameter of Earth across the equator is 7926 mi.
personal knowledge? Have you run a mile? Hiked Given that a mile equals 1.609 km, what is Earth’s
10 mi? Run a marathon? diameter in kilometers? In centimeters?
2. What is the difference between our Solar System and 2. The diameter of the Moon across its equator is
our Galaxy? Between our Galaxy and the Universe? 3476 km. Given that a kilometer equals 0.6214 mi,
3. Why are light-years more convenient than miles, what is the Moon’s diameter in miles?
kilometers, or astronomical units for measuring certain 3. One astronomical unit is about 1.50 3 10 8 km . Explain
distances? why this is the same as 150 3 10 6 km.
4. Why is it difficult to detect planets orbiting other stars? 4. Venus orbits 0.72 AU from the Sun. What is that
5. What does the size of the star image in a photograph distance in kilometers? (Hint: See Problem 3.)
tell you? 5. Light from the Sun takes 8 minutes to reach Earth.
6. What is the difference between the Milky Way and the How long does it take to reach Mars?
Milky Way Galaxy? 6. The Sun is almost 400 times farther from Earth than is
7. What are the largest known structures in the Universe? the Moon. How long does light from the Moon take to
8. How does astronomy help answer the question “What reach Earth?
are we?” 7. If the speed of light is 3.0 3 105 km/s, how many
9. How Do We Know? How does the scientific method kilometers is 1 light-year? How many meters?
give scientists a way to know about nature? (Note: One year contains 3.2 3 107 s .)
8. How long does it take light to cross the diameter of
our Milky Way Galaxy?
9. The nearest large galaxy to our own is about 2.5 million
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ly away. How many meters is that? (Hint: See Problem 7.)
1. You and three of your friends have won an all- 10. How many galaxies like our own would it take laid edge-
expenses paid one-time-only round-trip first-class to-edge to reach the nearest galaxy? (Hint: See Problem 9.)
vacation to anywhere in the Universe, but only if
the choice of destination is unanimous. Where do
you want to go, and how do you convince your
LEARNING TO LOOK
friends to agree? 1. In Figure 1-4, the division between daylight and
2. Think back to the last time you got a new phone and darkness is at the right on the globe of Earth. How do
had to figure out how it worked. In what way did you you know this is the sunset line and not the sunrise line?
employ the scientific method, maybe without even 2. Look at Figure 1-6. How can you tell that Mercury does
realizing that you did? not follow a circular orbit?
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
3. Of the objects listed here, which would be contained 4. In Figure 1-15 which stars are brightest, and which are
inside the object shown in Figure 1-14? faintest? How can you tell? Why can’t you tell which
• Stars stars in this photograph are biggest or which have
planets?
• Planets
• Galaxy
• Clusters
FIGURE 1-15
• Spiral arms
FIGURE 1-14
Bill Schoening/NOAO/AURA/NSF
REU program/NOAO/AURA/NSF
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
2 User’s Guide to
the Sky: Patterns
and Cycles
The Southern Cross I saw every night abeam. The Sun every morning came up
astern; every evening it went down ahead. I wished for no other compass to guide
me, for these were true.
Captain Joshua Slocum Sailing Alone Around the World
Rami Daud/NASA
After finishing this chapter go to PAGE 33 for STUDY TOOLS.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
CO 2 A sequence of images spanning about 2 hours showing a lunar eclipse
visible from the United States in September 2015. From left to right, the full
moon is increasingly covered by Earth’s shadow. In the image at far right,
the Moon is shown fully shadowed, illuminated only by the orange glow of
sunlight refracted through Earth’s atmosphere. This was a rare “supermoon”
eclipse that occurred when the Moon was closest in its orbit to Earth, and near
the horizon for many observers, thereby appearing as large as possible.
© shooarts/Shutterstock.com
The constellations named in Western culture origi- in any constellation. Regions of the southern sky not vis-
nated in ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia, Babylon, ible to observers living at northern latitudes also were not
Egypt, and Greece beginning as many as 5000 years ago. identified with any constellations. Constellation boundar-
Of those ancient constellations, 48 are still in use. In those ies, when they were defined at all, were only approximate,
former times, a constellation was simply a loose grouping of so a star like Alpheratz could be thought of as both a part of
bright stars, and many of the fainter stars were not included Pegasus and also a part of Andromeda (Figure 2-1).
FIGURE 2-1
(a) (b)
From Duncan Bradford, Wonders of the Heavens,
Alpheratz
Andromeda
Alpheratz
Boston, John B. Russell 1837
Great Square
of Pegasus
(a) In antiquity, constellation boundaries were poorly defined, as shown on this map by the curving d
otted lines
that separate Pegasus from Andromeda. (b) Modern constellation boundaries are precisely defined by international
scientific agreement.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
In recent centuries, astronomers have added exceptions (Figure 2-3). A Greek-letter star name also
40 modern constellations to fill gaps, and in 1928 the includes the possessive form of the constellation name;
International Astronomical Union (IAU) established for example, the brightest star in the constellation Canis
a total of 88 official constellations with clearly defined Major is Alpha Canis Majoris. This name identifies the
permanent boundaries that together cover the entire star and the constellation and gives a clue to the relative
sky. Thus, a constellation now represents not a group brightness of the star. Compare this with the ancient indi-
of stars, but a section of the sky—a viewing direction— vidual name for that star, Sirius, which tells you nothing
and any star within the region belongs only to that one about its location or brightness.
constellation.
In addition to the 88 official constellations, the sky
contains a number of less formally defined groupings 2-1c Star Brightness
called asterisms. The Big Dipper, for example, is an Astronomers usually describe the brightness of stars
asterism you probably recognize; it is part of the con- using the magnitude scale. The ancient astronomers
stellation Ursa Major (the Great Bear). Another aster- originally divided the stars into six brightness groups. The
ism is the Great Square of Pegasus that includes three brightest were called first-magnitude stars. The scale
stars from Pegasus and the previously mentioned star continued downward to sixth-magnitude stars, the faint-
Alpheratz, now considered to be part of Andromeda only. est visible to the human eye. Thus, the larger the mag-
Although constellations and asterisms are named as nitude number, the fainter the star. This makes sense if
if they were real groupings, most are made up of stars
that are not physically associated with one another. Some
stars may be many times farther away than others in the FIGURE 2-2
same constellation and moving through space in different
directions. The only thing they have in common is that
they lie in approximately the same direction as viewed
sky
from Earth, as in Figure 2-2. ed on the
oject
rs pr
Sta
2-1b Star Names
In addition to naming groups of stars, ancient astrono-
mers named the brighter stars, and modern astronomers
still use many of those names. The names of the constel-
lations are in Latin or Greek, the languages of science
in Medieval and Renaissance Europe. Most individual
star names derive from ancient Arabic, much altered
over centuries. For example, the name of Betelgeuse,
the bright red star in Orion, comes from the Arabic Nearest
phrase yad al-jawza, meaning “Hand of Jawza [Orion].” star
Farthest star
Aldebaran, the bright red eye of Taurus the bull, comes
from the Arabic al-dabar an, meaning “the follower [of
the Pleiades].” Actual distribution
Another way to identify stars is to assign Greek of stars in space
letters to the bright stars in a constellation in approxi-
mate order of brightness. Earth
Thus the brightest star is
asterism A named grouping usually designated alpha
The stars you see in the Big Dipper are not at the same dis-
of stars that is not one of the (a), the second brightest
recognized constellations. tance from Earth. You see the stars in a group in the sky
beta (b), and so on. For because they lie in the same general direction as seen from
magnitude scale The many constellations, the Earth, not because they are all actually near each other. The
astronomical brightness scale. letters follow the order of sizes of the star dots in the star chart represent the apparent
The larger the number, the fainter brightness of the stars.
the star.
brightness, but some con-
stellations, like Orion, are
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
measure of the light
FIGURE 2-3 energy from a star
that hits one square
meter in one second.
(See Magnitudes in
the Math Reference
Cards MR .) With
l
a
modern scientific
instruments, astrono-
g mers can measure
a Orionis is the flux of starlight
Orion
Orion also known as with high precision
Betelgeuse.
d and then use a simple
z e mathematical relation-
h
ship that relates light
i flux to apparent visual
t
magnitude. Instead
William K. Hartman/Planetary Science Institute
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Earth with the stars stuck on the
FIGURE 2-4 inside like thumbtacks in a ceiling.
Modern astronomers know that the
Venus at Hubble
brightest Space stars are scattered through space at
Telescope different distances, but it is still use-
Sirius limit
ful in some contexts for you to think
Full
Sun moon Polaris of the sky as a great sphere enclosing
Naked Earth with stars all at one distance.
eye limit
The celestial sphere is an exam-
ple of a scientific model, a com-
mon feature of scientific thought
–30 –25 –20 –15 –10 –5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
(See How Do We Know? 2-1.). You
Apparent magnitude (mv)
can use the celestial sphere as a con-
Brighter Fainter venient model of the sky. You will
learn about more scientific models
The scale of apparent visual magnitudes extends into negative numbers
to represent the brightest objects and to positive numbers larger than 6 to in the chapters that follow.
represent objects fainter than the human eye can see. As you study Concept Art 2A,
“The Sky Around Us,” notice
three important points:
or ultraviolet light, those types of radiation (discussed 1. The sky appears to rotate westward around Earth each
further in Chapters 4 and 5) are invisible to human day, but that is a consequence of the eastward rotation
eyes. The subscript “V” in mV is a reminder that you of Earth. This produces day and night.
are including only light that is visible. Other magni- 2. What you can see in the sky depends on your lati-
tude systems have been invented to express the bright- tude. For example, Australians see many stars, constel-
ness of invisible light arriving at Earth from the stars. lations, and asterisms not visible from North America,
4. An apparent magnitude tells only how bright the star but they never see the Big Dipper.
is as seen from Earth but doesn’t tell anything about a 3. Astronomers measure distances across the sky as
star’s true power output because the star’s distance is angles expressed in units of degrees and subdivisions
not included. You can describe the true power output of degrees called arc minutes and arc seconds.
of stars with another magnitude system that will be
described in Chapter 9.
2-2b Precession
In addition to causing the obvious daily motion of
2-2 THE SKY AND ITS MOTIONS the sky, Earth’s rotation is connected with a very slow
celestial motion that can be detected only over centu-
ries. More than 2000 years ago, Hipparchus compared
The sky above you seems
positions of some stars with their positions recorded
to be a blue dome in the
nearly two c enturies previously and realized that
celestial sphere An daytime and a sparkling
the celestial poles and equator were slowly moving
imaginary sphere of very large ceiling at night. Learning
radius surrounding Earth to which across the sky. Later astronomers understood that this
to understand the sky
the planets, stars, Sun, and Moon motion is caused by a toplike motion of Earth known
requires that you first recall
seem to be attached. as precession.
the perspectives of people
scientific model A scientific If you have ever played with a gyroscope or top,
who observed the sky thou-
metaphor; a concept that you have seen how the spinning mass resists any sud-
organizes thought about an aspect
sands of years ago.
den change in the direction of its axis of rotation. The
of nature without necessarily being
2-2a The Celestial more massive the top and the more rapidly it spins,
literally true.
the more it resists your efforts to twist it out of posi-
precession The slow change Sphere tion. You may recall that even the most rapidly spin-
in orientation of the Earth’s axis
Ancient astronomers ning top slowly swings its axis around in a circle. The
of rotation. One cycle takes nearly
26,000 years. believed the sky was a weight of the top tends to make it tip over, and this
great sphere surrounding combines with its rapid rotation to make its axis sweep
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
How Do We Know? 2-1
Scientific Models
How can a scientific model be useful if it isn’t
entirely true? A scientific model is a carefully devised
conception of how something works, a framework that
helps scientists think about some aspect of nature. The
celestial sphere is a model that helps astronomers think
about the motions of the sky.
Chemists, for example, use colored balls to represent
atoms and sticks to represent the bonds between them,
almost like Tinkertoys. Using these molecular models,
chemists can see the three-dimensional shape of mol-
ecules and understand how the atoms interconnect.
The molecular model of DNA proposed by Watson
and Crick in 1953 led to our modern understanding of
the mechanisms of genetics. You have probably seen
elaborate ball-and-stick models of DNA, but does the
molecule really look like Tinkertoys? No, but the model
is both simple enough and accurate enough to help
scientists think about DNA.
A scientific model is not a statement of truth; it
out the shape of a cone. That motion is precession from vertical. Earth’s large mass and rapid rotation
(Figure 2-7a). In later c hapters, you will learn that keep its axis of rotation pointed toward a spot near
many celestial bodies precess. the star Polaris, and the axis would remain pointed
Earth spins like a giant top, but it does not spin constantly in that direction except for the effect of
upright in its orbit; its axis is tipped 23.4 degrees precession.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Concept Art 2A
THE SKY AROUND US
1
The eastward rotation of Earth causes the Sun, Moon, and Zenith
stars to move westward in the sky as if the celestial sphere
were rotating westward around Earth. From any location
on Earth you see only half of the celestial sphere, the half North
above the horizon. The zenith marks the top of the sky celestial
above your head, and the nadir marks the bottom of the West pole
sky directly under your feet. The drawing at right shows
Cel
the view for an observer in North America. An observer in
est
South America would have a dramatically different horizon, South North
ial
zenith, and nadir. Earth
eq
n
Horizo
ua
tor
The apparent pivot points are the north celestial pole East
and the south celestial pole located directly above Earth’s
north and south poles. Halfway between the celestial poles South
lies the celestial equator. Earth’s rotation defines the direc- celestial
pole
tions you use every day. The north point and south point
are the points on the horizon closest to the celestial poles. Nadir
The east point and the west point lie halfway between
the north and south points. The celestial equator always
touches the horizon at the east and west points.
North
celestial
1a
Ursa This time exposure of about 30 minutes shows stars as streaks,
pole
Major called star trails, rising behind an observatory dome. The
camera was facing n ortheast to take this photo. The motion
Ursa you see in the sky depends on which direction you look, as
Minor shown at right. Looking north, you see the star Polaris, the
North Star, located near the north celestial pole. As the sky
appears to rotate westward, Polaris hardly moves, but other
Looking north stars circle the celestial pole. Looking south from a location in
North America, you can see stars circling the south celestial
pole, which is invisible below the southern horizon.
Gemini Orion
Looking east
Canis
Major
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
North celestial
Zenith pole a
Astronomers measure
distance across the
sky as angles.
Latitude 90°
W
Astronomers might say, “The star was two degrees
S
Latitude 60° E
N from the Moon.” Of course, the stars are much far-
ther away than the Moon, but when you think of
the celestial sphere, you can measure distance on
the sky as an angle. The angular distance between
2
North two objects is the angle between two lines extend-
Zenith celestial
pole
ing from your eye to the two objects. Astronomers
measure angles in degrees, arc minutes, 1/60th of
W a degree, and arc seconds, 1/60th of an arc minute.
L
Using the term arc avoids confusion with minutes
S N and seconds of time. The angular diameter of an
object is the angular distance from one edge to
Latitude 30° E the other. The Sun and Moon are each about half a
North
degree in diameter, and the bowl of the Big Dipper
Zenith celestial is about 10 degrees wide.
pole
W
What you see in the sky depends on your latitude as shown at left.
S
Latitude 0° E
N Imagine that you begin a journey in the ice and snow at Earth’s
North Pole with the north celestial pole directly overhead. As you
walk southward, the celestial pole moves toward the horizon, and
you can see farther into the southern sky. The angular distance from
3
South
celestial
the horizon to the north celestial pole always equals your latitude
Zenith
pole (L)—the basis for celestial navigation. As you cross Earth’s equator,
the celestial equator would pass through your zenith, and the north
W celestial pole would sink below your northern horizon.
S N
A few constellations Cassiopeia
Latitude –30° seen as circumpolar
E
from the U.S.
Cepheus Perseus
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Earth has a slight bulge around its middle
because of its rotation. The gravity of the Sun and
FIGURE 2-5
Moon pull on the bulge, tending to twist Earth’s axis
“upright” relative to its orbit. If Earth were a per- To Polaris
fect sphere, it would not be subjected to this twisting
force. Notice that the analogy to a spinning top is not 23.5°
perfect; gravity tends to make a top fall over, but it Precession
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
FIGURE 2-6
Capricornus
Aquarius Sagittarius
Scorpius
Pisces
Libra
Earth’s orbit Sun
Aries
Sun
View from Earth View from Earth
on January 1 on March 1
The motion of Earth around the Sun makes the Sun appear to move against the background of the stars. The circular orbit of
Earth is thus projected on the sky as the ecliptic, the circular path of the Sun during the year as seen from Earth. If you could see
the stars in the daytime, you would notice the Sun crossing in front of the distant constellations as Earth moves along its orbit.
see the Sun in front of Aquarius. Note that your angle relative to its orbit. As you study Concept Art 2B,
of view in Figure 2-6 makes the Earth’s orbit seem very “The Cycle of the Seasons,” notice two important
elliptical when it is really almost a perfect circle. principles:
Through the year, the Sun moves eastward among
1. The seasons are not caused by variation in the distance
the stars following a line called the ecliptic, the appar-
between Earth and the Sun. Earth’s orbit is nearly
ent path of the Sun among the stars. Recall the concept
circular, so it is always about the same distance from
of the celestial sphere; if the sky were a great screen,
the Sun.
the ecliptic would be the shadow cast by the Earth’s
2. The seasons are caused by changes in the amount
orbit. In other words, you can describe the ecliptic
of solar energy that Earth’s Northern and Southern
as the projection of the Earth’s orbit on the celestial
Hemispheres receive at different times of the year,
sphere. Earth circles the Sun in 365.26 days, and, con-
resulting from the tip of the Earth’s equator and axis
sequently, the Sun appears to go around the sky once in
relative to its orbit.
the same period. You don’t notice this motion because
you cannot see the stars in the daytime, but the appar- The seasons are so important as a cycle of growth
ent motion of the Sun caused by a real motion of Earth and harvest that cultures around the world have attached
has an important consequence that you do notice—the great significance to the ecliptic. It marks the center
seasons. line of the zodiac (“circle of animals”), and the motion
of the Sun, Moon, and
the five visible planets
2-3b Seasons (Mercury, Venus, Mars,
ecliptic The apparent path of
the Sun around the sky.
The seasons are caused by the revolution of Earth around Jupiter, and Saturn) are
zodiac A band centered on the
the Sun combined with a simple fact you have already the basis of the ancient ecliptic and encircling the sky.
encountered: Earth’s equator is tipped 23.4 degrees superstition of astrology.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Concept Art 2B
THE CYCLE OF THE SEASONS
1 North celestial pole
You can use the celestial sphere to help you think about the sea-
sons. The celestial equator is the projection of Earth’s equator on Celestial
equator
the sky, and the ecliptic is the projection of Earth’s orbit on the sky.
Because Earth is tipped in its orbit, the ecliptic and equator are Autumnal equinox
inclined to each other by 23.48 as shown at right. As the Sun moves Winter
eastward around the sky, it spends half the year in the southern solstice
half of the sky and half the year in the northern half. That causes
the seasons.
Summer
Ecliptic solstice
The Sun crosses the celestial equator going northward at the 23.4°
point called the vernal equinox. The Sun is at its farthest north Vernal equinox
at the point called the summer solstice. It crosses the celestial
equator going southward at the autumnal equinox and reaches
its most southern point at the winter solstice.
1a
South celestial pole
23.4°
To
1b 40°
N la
On the day of the summer sol- titu
de
stice in late June, Earth’s Northern
Hemisphere is inclined toward the
Sun, and sunlight shines almost
straight down at northern lati-
Sunlight nearly direct
tudes. At southern latitudes, sun- on northern latitudes
light strikes the ground at an angle
and spreads out. North America Equ
ato
r
has warm weather, and South To Sun
America has cool weather.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
2
Noon sun
Summer solstice
light
C ele
someone in the Northern
s ti a
South North Hemisphere. First, the noon
le
summer Sun is higher in
qu
the sky and the winter Sun
ato
1c Light striking the ground
r
is lower, as shown by the
at a steep angle spreads East Sunrise longer winter shadows.
out less than light striking At summer solstice Thus winter sunlight is
the ground at a shallow angle. Light more spread out. Second,
from the summer solstice Sun strikes the summer Sun rises in the
northern latitudes from nearly over- northeast and sets in the
head and is concentrated. Noon sun northwest, spending more
Sunset West than 12 hours in the sky.
Winter solstice light The winter Sun rises in the
C ele
southeast and sets in the
s ti a
South North southwest, spending less
le
than 12 hours in the sky.
qu Both of these effects mean
ato
Sunrise r that northern latitudes
East receive more energy from
At winter solstice
the summer Sun, and sum-
Light from the winter solstice Sun mer days are warmer than
strikes northern latitudes at a much winter days.
steeper angle and spreads out. The
same amount of energy is spread over
a larger area, so the ground receives
less energy from the winter Sun.
ris
23.4°
winter solstice in late
To
winter solstice
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
any planet in the dawn sky is called a morning
FIGURE 2-7
star. Perhaps the most beautiful is Venus, which
Ec
can become as bright as magnitude −4.7. As Venus
Sunset, looking west
lip
tic
moves around its orbit, it can dominate the western
sky each evening for many weeks, but eventually
its orbit appears to carry it back toward the Sun
as seen from Earth, and it is lost in the haze near
Venus the horizon. A few weeks later you can see Venus
reappear in the dawn sky as a brilliant morning star.
Months later it will switch back to being an evening
star once again.
Mercury
Sun
2-4 C YCLES OF
a
THE MOON
Sunrise, looking east
tic
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
How Do We Know? 2-2
Pseudoscience
What is the difference between a science and a
pseudoscience? Astronomers have a low opinion
of beliefs such as astrology, not only because they
are groundless but also because they pretend to be
a science. They are pseudosciences, from the Greek
pseudo, meaning “false.”
A pseudoscience is a set of beliefs that appears
to include scientific ideas but fail to obey the most
basic rules of science. For example, some years ago a
claim was made that pyramidal shapes focus cosmic
forces on anything underneath and might have heal-
Astrology may be the
ing properties. Supposedly, a pyramid made of paper,
oldest pseudoscience.
plastic, or other materials would preserve fruit, sharpen
razor blades, and do other miraculous things. Many
books promoted the idea of the special power of pyra- but because people wanted and expected the claim
mids, and this idea led to a popular fad. to be true, they reported that they slept more soundly.
A key characteristic of science is that its claims can Vague claims based on personal testimony that
be tested and verified. In this case, simple experiments cannot be tested are another sign of a pseudoscience.
showed that any shape, not just a pyramid, protects a Astrology is probably the best-known pseudosci-
piece of fruit from airborne spores and allows it to dry ence. It has been tested over and over for centuries, and
without rotting. Likewise, any shape allows oxidation it doesn’t work. It has been proven beyond a reasonable
to improve the cutting edge of a razor blade. Because doubt that there is no connection between the positions
experimental evidence contradicted the claim and of the Sun, Moon, and planets and people’s personali-
because supporters of that hypothesis declined to aban- ties, or events in their lives. Nevertheless, many people
don or revise their claims, you can recognize pyramid believe in astrology despite contradictory evidence.
power as a pseudoscience. The disregard of contradic- Pseudosciences appeal to our need to understand
tory evidence and alternate explanations is a sure sign and control the world around us. Some such claims
of a pseudoscience. involve medical cures, ranging from using magnetic
Pseudoscientific claims can be self-fulfilling. bracelets and crystals to focus mystical power to aston-
For example, some believers slept under pyrami- ishingly expensive, illegal, and dangerous treatments
dal tents to improve their rest. There is no logical for cancer. Logic is a stranger to pseudoscience, but
mechanism by which such a tent could affect a sleeper, human fears and needs are not.
seen the full moon rising dramatically or a thin cres- 2. The changing shape of the Moon as it passes through
cent moon hanging in the evening sky. Study Concept its cycle of phases is produced by sunlight illuminat-
Art 2C, “The Phases of the Moon,” and notice three ing different parts of the side of the Moon you can
important points: see. You always see the same side of the Moon look-
ing down on you, but the shifting shadows make the
1. The Moon always keeps the same side facing Earth,
“man in the Moon” change moods as the Moon cycles
and you never see the far side of the Moon. “The man
through its phases (see also Figure 2-8).
in the Moon” (some cultures see “the rabbit in the
3. The orbital period of the Moon around the Earth is
Moon” instead) is produced by familiar features on
not the same as the length of a Moon phase cycle.
the Moon’s near side.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Concept Art 2C
THE PHASES OF THE MOON
1
As the Moon orbits Earth, it rotates to keep the same side facing
Earth as shown at right. Consequently you always see the same
features on the Moon, and you never see the far side of the Moon.
A mountain on the Moon that points at Earth will always point at
Earth as the Moon revolves and rotates.
(Not to scale)
First quarter
As seen at left, sunlight always illu-
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
The Moon orbits
3
New moon Sun eastward around
Ecliptic Earth in 27.32 days,
New its sidereal period
moon (pronounced si-
DARE-ee-al). This is how long the
Sagittarius
Scorpius Moon takes to circle the sky once
The Sun and Moon are near
each other at new moon. and return to the same position
among the stars.
You can use the diagram on the opposite page to To think about the changing phases of
determine when the Moon rises and sets at different phases. the Moon, imagine facing the southern
sky, which is where people living in the
TIMES OF MOONRISE AND MOONSET Northern Hemisphere find the ecliptic.
The Moon crosses from west to east
Phase Moonrise Moonset night by night, following the ecliptic.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
From planet Earth you can see a
FIGURE 2-8 phenomenon that is not visible from
most planets. It happens that the Sun
is 400 times larger than the Moon
and, on the a verage, 390 times farther
away, so the Sun and Moon have nearly
equal apparent diameters. (See The
Small Angle Formula in the Math
Reference Cards MR .) Thus, the Moon
is just about the right size to cover the
bright disk of the Sun and cause a solar
eclipse. In a solar eclipse, it is the Sun
that is being hidden (eclipsed) and the
Moon that is “in the way.”
A shadow consists of two parts,
as you can see in Figure 2-9. The
umbra is the region of total shadow.
For example, if you were in the umbra
of the Moon’s shadow, you would see
no portion of the Sun. The umbra
of the Moon’s shadow usually just
barely reaches Earth’s surface and
covers a relatively small circular zone
(Figure 2-9a). Standing in that umbral
zone, you would be in total shadow,
unable to see any part of the Sun’s sur-
face. That is called a total eclipse, as
Castleski/Shutterstock.com
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
The Moon moves on in its orbit and in an hour
FIGURE 2-9
the Sun is completely visible again.
Sometimes when the Moon crosses in
front of the Sun it is too small to fully cover the
Penumbra Sun, and then you would witness an annular
Umbra
eclipse. That is a solar eclipse in which an
annulus (meaning “ring”) of the Sun’s disk
Sunlight is visible around the disk of the Moon. The
eclipse never becomes total; it never quite
gets dark, and you can’t see the faint features
of the solar atmosphere. Annular eclipses
Path of total eclipse occur because the Moon follows a slightly
Moon
a elliptical orbit around Earth. If the Moon is
in the farther part of its orbit during totality,
its apparent diameter will be less than the
apparent diameter of the Sun, and thus you
see an annular eclipse. Furthermore, Earth’s
orbit is slightly elliptical, so the Earth-to-Sun
distance varies slightly, and consequently so
does the apparent diameter of the solar disk,
contributing to the effect of the Moon’s vary-
ing apparent size.
If you plan to observe a solar eclipse,
remember that the Sun is bright enough to
burn your eyes and cause permanent damage if
you look at it directly. This is true whether there
is an eclipse or not. Solar eclipses can be mis-
Daniel Good
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
FIGURE 2-10 FIGURE 2-11
A Total Solar Eclipse
Sunlight
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
TABLE 2-1 TOTAL AND ANNULAR ECLIPSES OF THE SUN, 2017 THROUGH 2024 *
Time of Mid- Maximum Length
Total/Annular Eclipse** of Total or Annular
Date (T/A) (UTC) Phase (Min:Sec) Area of Visibility
TABLE 2-2 TOTAL AND PARTIAL ECLIPSES OF THE MOON, 2017 THROUGH 2024
Date Time of Mid-Eclipse (UTC)* Length of Totality (Hr:Min) Length of Eclipse** (Hr:Min)
* Times are Universal Time. Subtract 5 hours for Eastern Standard Time, 6 hours for Central Standard Time, 7 hours for Mountain Standard Time, and
8 hours for Pacific Standard Time. For Daylight Savings Time (mid-March through early November), add 1 hour to Standard Time. Lunar eclipses that
occur between sunset and sunrise in your time zone will be visible, and those at midnight will be best placed.
** Does not include penumbral phase.
Source: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
FIGURE 2-12
b
Motion of Moon
a
A cross section of
Earth’s shadow shows
the umbra and penumbra. Sunlight scattered from Earth’s
atmosphere bathes the totally
eclipsed Moon in a coppery glow.
Orbit of
Moon
© 1982 by Dr. Jack B. Marling
A longer exposure was used to record the Moon while it was totally eclipsed. The Moon’s path appears curved in
the photo because of photographic effects.
the Moon during totality and makes it glow coppery red, Lunar eclipses always occur at full moon but not
as shown in Figure 2-12b. at every full moon. The Moon’s orbit is tipped about
If the Moon passes a bit too far north or south of the 5 degrees to the ecliptic, so most full moons cross the
center of Earth’s shadow, it may only partially enter the sky north or south of Earth’s shadow and there is no
umbra, and you see a partial lunar eclipse. The part of lunar eclipse that month (see Figure 2-13). For the
the Moon that remains outside the umbra in the penum- same reason, solar eclipses always occur during new
bra receives some direct sunlight, and the glare is usually moon but not at every new moon. The orientation of
great enough to prevent your seeing the faint coppery the Moon’s orbit in space varies slowly and as a result
glow of the part of the Moon in the umbra. solar and lunar eclipses repeat in a pattern called the
FIGURE 2-13
Full moon
Earth
New moon
Umbral shadows of Earth and the Moon. Because of the tilt of the Moon’s orbit relative to the ecliptic, it is easy for the shadows
to miss their mark at full moon and at new moon and fail to produce eclipses. (The diameters of Earth and the Moon are
exaggerated by a factor of 2 for clarity.)
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Saros cycle lasting 18 years and 11 1 3 days. Prehistoric the Moon passes through Earth’s shadow. That is, the
peoples who understood the Saros cycle could pre- eclipse must occur between sunset and sunrise at your
dict eclipses without understanding what the Sun and location to be visible.
Moon really were. Table 2-2 will allow you
to determine when some Saros cycle The 18-year, 11 13 -day
Although there are usually no more than one or
period after which the pattern of
two lunar eclipses each year, it is not difficult to see upcoming lunar eclipses lunar and solar eclipses repeats.
one. You need only be on the dark side of Earth when will be visible.
STUDY
TOOLS 2 ASTRO ONLINE
Visit ASTRO Online at www.cengagebrain.com
◻ Interactive Reading
IN THE BOOK ◻ Practice Quizzing
◻ Tear Out the Review Card on User’s Guide to the Sky: Patterns ◻ Videos and Animations
and Cycles. ◻ Exclusive Features
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Questions 2
and Problems
REVIEW QUESTIONS 3. You are packing for a vacation on a planet orbiting
another star that is much like the Sun. Why might you
1. What is the difference between an asterism and a want some information about the planet’s orbit size
constellation? Give some examples. and axis tilt to know what to pack?
2. How does the Greek-letter designation of a star give 4. You happen to visit the Moon when some people
you a clue to its brightness? on Earth see a total solar eclipse. Who has a more
3. How did the magnitude system originate in the spectacular experience of this event, you or the friends
classification of stars by brightness? you left behind back on Earth? Why?
4. What does the word apparent mean in apparent visual
magnitude?
5. In what ways is the celestial sphere a scientific model? PROBLEMS
6. If Earth did not rotate, could you define the celestial 1. If light from one star is 40 times brighter (has 40 times
poles and celestial equator? more flux) than light from another star, what is their
7. Where would you go on Earth to place a celestial pole difference in magnitudes? (Hint: See Magnitudes in
at your zenith? the Math Reference Cards MR .)
8. Why does the number of circumpolar constellations 2. If two stars differ by 8.6 magnitudes, what is their
depend on the latitude of the observer? flux ratio? (Hint: See Magnitudes in the Math
9. If Earth did not rotate, could you still define the Reference Cards MR .)
ecliptic? Why or why not? 3. Star A has a magnitude of 2.5; star B, 5.5; and star
10. Why are the seasons reversed in the Southern C, 9.5. Which is brightest? Which are visible to
Hemisphere relative to the Northern Hemisphere? the unaided eye? Which pair of stars has an flux
11. Do the phases of the Moon look the same from every ratio of 16? (Hint: See Magnitudes in the Math
place on Earth, or is the Moon full at different times as Reference Cards MR .)
seen from different locations? 4. By what factor is sunlight brighter than moonlight?
12. What phase would Earth be in if you were on the (Hint: Refer to Figure 2-4, and see Magnitudes in the
Moon when the Moon was full? At first quarter? Math Reference Cards MR .)
At waning crescent? 5. If you are at a latitude of 35 degrees north of Earth’s
13. Why isn’t there an eclipse at every new moon and at equator, what is the angular distance from the
every full moon? northern horizon up to the north celestial pole? From
14. Why is the Moon red during a total lunar eclipse? the southern horizon down to the south celestial pole?
15. How Do We Know? How can a scientific model be 6. Given that Earth is 4.6 billion (4.6 3 109 ) years old,
useful if it isn’t a correct description of nature? how many precessional cycles have occurred?
16. How Do We Know? What are the main characteristics 7. Identify the phases of the Moon if on March 20 the
of a pseudoscience? Can you suggest other examples Moon were located at the position the Sun is located
of pseudoscience not described in the textbook? Can on: (a) March 20, (b) September 22, (c) June 22, and
you suggest other examples? (d) December 21.
8. Identify the phases of the Moon if at sunset in the
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS Northern Hemisphere the Moon were (a) near the
eastern horizon, (b) high in the south, (c) in the
1. Using stars from one or more of the “official” southeast, (d) in the southwest.
constellations, create an asterism that is significant 9. Draw a diagram showing Earth, the Moon, and
to the culture of your school. shadows during (a) a total solar eclipse, (b) a total
2. You discover an ancient document that lists the location lunar eclipse, (c) a partial lunar eclipse, and (d) an
of buried treasure as 368 24' 11.9" N by 258 25' 35.4" E. annular eclipse.
You look on a map to see approximately where that is, 10. Phobos, one of the Moons of Mars, has an average
but when you start on your trip you find that your GPS diameter of 22.5 km and orbits 5980 km above the
is broken. How will you know when you’re at the right surface of the planet. What is the angular diameter of
latitude? Much harder question: How will you know Phobos as seen from Mars? (Hint: See The Small-
when you’re at the right longitude? Angle Formula in the Math Reference Cards MR .)
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
LEARNING TO LOOK 4. Figure 2-15 shows the annular eclipse of May 30, 1984.
How is it different from the annular eclipse shown in
1. To take the photos that are combined on the opening Figure 2-9? Why do you suppose it is different?
page of this chapter, was the photographer located
on the day or night side of the Earth? Was the
photographer in the Moon’s umbra, penumbra, or FIGURE 2-15
both? How do you know?
2. Look at Concept Art 2C. Find the person looking
at the third-quarter phase of the Moon at sunrise.
What percentage of the near side of the Moon is
illuminated? Likewise, what percentage is in the dark?
Repeat the exercise for the new phase of the Moon.
3. Figure 2-14 shows a crescent Moon. Explain why the
Moon could never look this way at night.
FIGURE 2-14
The New Yorker Collection 2006 Tom Cheney from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved
Laurence Marschall
Visual
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
3 The Origin
of Modern
Astronomy
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
CO 3 Galileo’s telescope revealed such things
as craters on the Moon, and he explained how
that evidence could be used to test the prevailing
Earth-centered model of the Universe. He was
condemned by the Inquisition in 1633.
© shooarts/Shutterstock.com
didn’t know that we live inside a galaxy. They didn’t even Study Concept Art 3A, “The Ancient Universe,”
know that the stars were other objects like the Sun. They and notice three important ideas:
thought the entire Universe consisted of Earth, the Sun,
1. Ancient philosophers and astronomers accepted
the Moon, and five moving points of light they called
without question—as first principles— that heav-
planets. Furthermore, they did not know that the plan-
enly objects must move on circular paths at constant
ets are composed of substances much like Earth’s. They
speeds, and that the Earth was motionless at the c enter
imagined that all of this was enclosed inside the celes-
of the Universe. Although a few ancient writers men-
tial sphere that lay just beyond the most distant planet,
tioned the possibility that Earth might move, most of
Saturn. Their entire Universe was quite small, and they
them did so in order to point out how that idea was
imagined that Earth lay at the center.
“obviously” wrong.
2. As viewed by you from Earth, the planets seem to
3-1a Aristotle’s Universe follow complicated paths in the sky, including epi-
Philosophers of the ancient world attempted to deduce sodes of “backward” motion that are difficult to
truth about the Universe by reasoning from first explain in terms of motion on circular paths at con-
principles. A first principle was something that seemed stant speeds.
obviously true to everyone and supposedly needed no 3. Finally, you can see how Ptolemy created an elabo-
further examination. That may strike you as peculiar; rate geometrical and mathematical model to explain
modern thinkers tend to observe how things work and details of the observed
then from that evidence make principles and conclusions motions of the planets first principle
that can always be reexamined. Before the Renaissance, while assuming Earth Something that seems obviously
however, reasoning from evidence (which you might call was motionless at the true and needs no further
examination.
“scientific thinking”) was not widespread. center of the Universe.
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-202
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
riuscì così felice; e meglio studiò l’obliquità dell’eclittica, sebbene
l’irregolare refrazione del sole in inverno gl’impedisse di precisare i
due solstizj. Mentre in tutta l’antichità conosciuta non erasi scoperto
alcun pianeta nuovo, primo nel 1789 Herschel trovò il pianeta urano:
poi Piazzi al 1º giorno del 1801 la cerere ferdinandea; scoperta che
destò rumore perchè prima, e perchè parea verificare l’ipotesi di
Keplero che i pianeti fossero disposti intorno al sole nelle distanze di
4, 7, 10, 16, 23, 52, 100, dove mancava il quarto fra marte e giove,
vuoto che restava empiuto da cerere. Ma dopochè l’Accademia di
Berlino, diviso il cielo in xxiv ore, ne affidò una a ciascuno de’ più
valenti osservatori, in modo da formare esattissime carte, divenne
cura più ch’altro meccanica lo scontrare altri asteroidi fra marte e
giove, che passano già il centinajo.
Oriani (1752-1832), povero fanciullo d’una terra suburbana di
Milano, raccolto dai Certosini e divenuto frate Barnaba, poi messo
alla specola di Milano, la amò passionatamente; quando Napoleone
esibivagli onori, esso gli cercava qualche stromento, e morendo
lasciolla erede. Risolse difficoltà dichiarate irresolubili da Eulero col
trovare tutte le relazioni possibili fra i sei elementi di qualsiasi
triangolo sferoidico; e precisò gli elementi di urano.
Giovanni Inghirami da Volterra 1779-1854 scolopio continuò la gloria
dell’osservatorio Ximeniano di Firenze; con somma lode eseguì una
delle ore per la gran carta uranografica; seguì le giornaliere
occultazioni delle piccole stelle sotto la luna con metodo
semplicissimo, sicchè con mere addizioni e sottrazioni possono
effettuarsi difficilissimi computi astronomici: laonde l’Accademia di
Londra lo dichiarò ingegno meraviglioso, e le principali nazioni
marittime vollero che alle loro effemeridi astronomiche fosse
aggiunta la planetaria dell’Inghirami. Illustrò difficili opere di calcolo
sublime, pubblicò un corso di matematiche e i Principj idromeccanici,
e nel 1817 misurò una base di cinque miglia sopra cui fu eretta la
triangolazione della Toscana. A simile operazione la matematica
celeste fu applicata in tutta la penisola per servire di norma alle
operazioni del censo; nel che bella lode meritarono gli astronomi di
Napoli [285].
Giovanni Plana da Voghera colla profonda analisi portò innanzi le
idee di Laplace, trattando della costituzione atmosferica della terra,
delle refrazioni astronomiche e delle perturbazioni planetarie, e del
movimento della luna, dedusse le tre coordinate dall’unico principio
dell’attrazione universale. Tracciò un meridiano attraverso il
Piemonte insieme col milanese Carlini, il quale trovò un nuovo
metodo per costruire le tavole astronomiche; e va posto fra i buoni
osservatori col Colla di Parma, il Calandrelli e lo Scarpellini di Roma,
il De Cuppis, il Cappocci, il Nasili di Napoli, lo Schiaparelli, il
Respighi, il Bianchi di Modena, il Santini d’Arezzo, allievo del celebre
Paoli, poi professore a Padova, diede una teoria degli stromenti
ottici. Del novarese Mossotti sono vanto il lavoro analitico sulla
determinazione delle orbite dei corpi celesti, e il metodo per dedurre
gli elementi d’un pianeta o d’una cometa da quattro osservazioni con
equazioni di primo grado; il Cavezzini anch’esso piemontese,
inventò le tavole geocentrica ed eliocentrica. Il gesuita Francesco De
Vico di Macerata, direttore dell’osservatorio romano, studiò le
nebulose e principalmente quella d’orione e le comete, e pel primo
vide in Italia quella d’Halley nel 1835, e ne calcolò il ritorno; esaminò
venere, precisandone la rotazione, e l’anello e il sesto e settimo
satellite di saturno. Benchè ungherese, dobbiamo nominare il barone
di Zach, che diresse la costruzione degli osservatorj di Napoli e di
Marlía presso Lucca, e dal 1816 al 26 pubblicò a Genova la sua
importantissima Corrispondenza astronomica, geografica, idrostatica
e statistica.
Il perfezionamento degli stromenti molto giovò all’astronomia, e se i
migliori telescopj ci vengono di fuori, quelli del modenese
Giambattista Amici non iscapitano da quelli d’Herschel [286]; fece
camere lucide, microscopj a riflessione e catadiottrici; e osservazioni
celesti moltiplicò dopo che, profugo, ricoverò a Firenze. Molto si
esaltarono pure i telescopj e i cannocchiali del piemontese Porro,
inventore del Cleps.
I varj osservatorj pubblicano annuarj e memorie, estendendo le
osservazioni anche a’ fenomeni magnetici pei quali un osservatorio
apposito venne piantato sul Vesuvio. Il gesuita Secchi vorrebbe aver
riconosciuto la legge che regola i bizzarri movimenti di declinazione
e inclinazione dell’ago magnetico, trovando che il sole opera su di
esso come fosse una potente calamita, situata a somma distanza
dalla terra, e avente i poli omonimi dei terrestri, dirizzati alla
medesima parte del cielo. Egli stesso potè pel primo valersi a Roma
delle comunicazioni elettriche per istabilire la contemporaneità delle
osservazioni metereologiche, sperata fonte di molte utilità
pratiche [287] e scrisse sull’unità delle forze.
Nel più potente stromento d’analisi, la matematica, quali nomi
opporremo al nostro Lagrangia e agli stranieri?
Lorenzo Mascheroni (1750-1800) (p. 576) morì profugo e povero in
Francia, ove fu consultato intorno al nuovo sistema di pesi e misure,
a cui collaborarono Lagrangia, Vassalli, Fabroni, Balbo e il lucchese
Pietro Franchini (1768-1837), autore d’un corso d’analisi, della
scienza del calcolo, di risoluzioni delle equazioni algebriche d’ogni
grado; e che fu dell’Istituto di Francia e senatore dell’Impero. Come il
veneto Collalto, così il Brunacci di Firenze sostennero fra noi il
metodo lagrangiano, mentre i Francesi preferivano quello di Liebniz,
o piuttosto li fuse. Il Mossotti suddetto, professore di fisica,
matematica e meccanica celeste a Pisa, i lombardi Mainardi,
Frisiani, Bordoni, Brioschi, Turazza, Cremona, Ruffini di Valentano...
continuano profonde ricerche matematiche, come i veneti Conti e
Minich, e il Bellavitis sul calcolo sublime e sul metodo delle
equipollenze, il vicentino Fusinieri sulla trisezione di qualunque arco
di circolo, il savojardo Luigi Menabrea sulle vibrazioni.
Quando Wronscki pubblicò la Filosofia della tecnica, posando pel
primo il teorema generale e il problema finale delle matematiche,
delle quali riponeva il carattere distintivo nella certezza d’un principio
unico trascendente assoluto, volle confutarlo il Romagnosi: ma oltre
mancare il rispetto dovuto a un grand’uomo, si mostrò incerto anche
nel maneggio della geometria.
Pietro Cossali veronese (1748-1815) nella Storia dell’algebra
rivendicò contro Montuela alcune glorie all’Italia, ma stanca col rozzo
stile e colle divagazioni. La Storia delle matematiche in Italia, scritta
in francese dal toscano Guglielmo Libri, erudito che per la
bibliografia concepì una passione divenutagli funesta, lo mostra
esperto matematico più che buono storico, accumulando e
divagando, e fino alterando i fatti per secondare le passioni sue e del
momento. Nessuna cosa è meno nazionale della scienza, e un
paese può offrirne un episodio, non mai quella concatenazione, che
unica costituisce le scienze. Troppo facilmente poi vi si mescolano la
passione e la boria fino al paradosso, s’arrogano alla patria
invenzioni certamente forestiere, ed anche senza volontaria infedeltà
si vagheggia come vero ciò che non è se non faticosamente trovato.
Il reggiano Giambattista Venturi (1746-1822), in Francia prese
pratica coi migliori fisici, dettò articoli e dissertazioni, lavorò sui
manoscritti di quelle biblioteche, e scrisse intorno a Lionardo, a
Galileo, al Castelvetro, ed all’origine e ai progressi dell’agricoltura;
uomo semplice fino all’avarizia, nelle tasche foderate di latta portava
la scarsa prebenda nei viaggi che, per confrontare manoscritti,
faceva alle diverse città.
Il vanto de’ nostri nell’idraulica fu sostenuto piuttosto con la pratica
che con teorie; ma vanno nominati con lode i toscani Fossombroni e
Brunacci suddetto, autore dell’Ariete idraulico, e il bergamasco
Tadini, la cui teorica delle onde è invano usurpata dagli stranieri.
Pessuti semplificò e ridusse intelligibile anche ai novizj la formola
complicata di Laplace per l’attrazione capillare.
L’asciugamento delle maremme toscane e venete, le dighe ai fiumi e
al mare, i canali di navigazione ed irrigui diedero grand’esercizio
agl’idraulici. Giuseppe Bruschetti preparò una buona storia de’ canali
di Lombardia; e dotte ricerche e sperienze sui nostri fiumi e laghi il
Parea, il Lombardini, il Paleocapa, il Colombani, il Brighenti, il
Possenti. Pietro Ferrari da Spoleto 1753-1825, architetto della
Camera apostolica, oltre i progetti per prosciugare il lago Trasimeno
e il Fúcino [288], lasciò quello d’un canale navigabile che
dall’Adriatico sboccherebbe in due luoghi del Mediterraneo. Nè di
progetti fu od è scarsezza. Ma gli è tempo che l’idraulica, l’economia
e l’agricoltura si associno seriamente per riparare ad uno de’
peggiori guai della nostra penisola, l’irruzione de’ torrenti, cagionata
dal diveltare e tagliare a vendetta le selve, onde i monti scollegansi e
franano, e le dirotte pioggie non più rattenute dalle foglie nè dalle
radici, colmano le valli e rovinano i colti.
In fronte alle scoperte moderne sta la pila del Volta (t. xii, p. 589), il
quale però visse fino al 1826 senz’ajutare d’un passo i progressi che
nella fisica e più nella chimica produsse quel suo trovato, divenuto
ben presto non solo potentissimo stromento di decomposizione, ma
fonte di luce, di forza, poi d’inesauribili meraviglie dopo combinatosi
col magnetismo. Questi sono meriti degli stranieri; ma non vuolsi
dimenticare il professore Brugnatelli che fino dal 1801 adoprò la pila
a decomporre i sali, ottenne la doratura col precipitare il rame, l’oro,
spiegò il fenomeno delle pile secondarie: splendidi veri, registrati
negli Annali di chimica, che lo fanno predecessore di Davy,
Nicholson, Jacobi, Kemp, sebbene non conosciuto [289]. Stefano
Marianini piemontese sostenne con perspicaci osservazioni l’origine
fisico-meccanica dell’elettricità, contro coloro che vi vedono
un’azione chimica, come il genovese Botto, che studiò pure
l’applicazione dell’elettromagnetismo alla meccanica. Matteucci
forlivese (-1868) studiò il passaggio delle correnti traverso ai liquidi,
e l’elettrofisiologia principalmente nella torpedine, e costruendo pile
d’animali appena morti [290]; ma non pare intenda connettere que’
fenomeni alle funzioni dei nervi, se non indirettamente. Isolati i
muscoli delle rane, scoprì che questi assorbono l’ossigeno ed
emettono l’acido carbonico a guisa de’ polmoni, e da essi ottenne
fenomeni chimici e correnti elettriche. Zamboni, repugnante alla
teoria elettro-chimica, colle pile a secco fece un pendolo perpetuo.
Nel 1790 Romagnosi osservava che una bussola, posta sotto
l’azione della corrente elettrica, deviava: annunziò il fatto sui giornali,
ma nè altri vi pose mente, nè egli vi diede sviluppo o esattezza
scientifica; sicchè al danese Oersted rimase intatta la gloria di
questa scoperta, per la quale potemmo a fili metallici, colle correnti
di induzione, comunicare tutte la proprietà d’un magnete, e a tal
modo ottenere le calamite intermittenti, fondamento delle tante
combinazioni elettro-magnetiche, per le quali si fecero e telegrafi e
macchine locomotrici. Ottenere pile di sì lieve costo, che divenga
economica la decomposizione dell’acqua, e così abbiasi a basso
prezzo il gas illuminante e il calefaciente, è lo studio pertinace e la
speranza del genovese Carosio.
La scienza del più bello e del più maraviglioso degli imponderabili, la
luce, ch’è la più avanzata delle fisiche perchè la più indipendente, fu
mutata di punto in bianco col tornare dalle emissioni di Neuton alle
ondulazioni di Huygens, donde gli stupendi fenomeni
dell’interferenza e della polarizzazione. Leopoldo Nobili reggiano
(1823) studiò quest’ultima; e la metallocromia, la doppia calamita
elettrica, la teoria delle induzioni prometteano in esso uno de’
maggiori fisici, se non moriva immaturo. La sua pila termoelettrica,
ove il calore opera sul galvanometro, più di qualunque termoscopio è
sensibile alle variazioni di calorico, potendosene dimostrare la
velocità della trasmissione e la quantità d’irradiazione traverso ai
corpi trasparenti, colla sensibilità fino di un terzo e di un quarto di
grado.
Macedonio Melloni, costretto coll’Amici a fuggire da Parma dopo la
rivoluzione del 1830, portò seco nell’esiglio un perfezionato
telescopio, e, compiute le sperienze, le offrì all’Istituto di Francia.
Biot ne stese una relazione in tutta lode. Le sue scoperte
consisteano nel ravvisare nel calorico raggi di natura differente,
alcuni essendo trasmessi, altri intercetti da certi corpi; oltre il calore
ordinario che si propaga lentamente e per diverse vie, ve n’ha uno
radiante, che si comunica non per contatto, ma istantaneamente, e
va sempre retto a guisa della luce. Il calore radiante è un agente
distinto dalla luce? Melloni risponde di sì; laonde la triplice proprietà
di scaldare, illuminare, produrre impressioni fotografiche. Morendo a
Napoli, lasciò un elettroscopio (1801-1856) assai migliore de’
precedenti.
Sul calorico sono pure ammirati gli studj del Belli (-1860) di
Vallanzasca. Amedeo Avogadro piemontese (1776-1856) ne stabilì
questa legge, che i calori specifici dei gas composti, ritenuti sotto
volume costante, paragonati a quelli d’un egual volume d’aria o di un
gas semplice sotto eguale temperatura e pressione, sono espressi
dalla radice quadrata della somma dei numeri interi e frazionarj dei
volumi dei gas semplici.
E d’altri fisici illustri ci gloriamo, quali Vincenzo Antinori fiorentino;
monsignor Gilj, che armò la cupola di San Pietro a Roma, isolandola
con un solo parafulmine, opera gigantesca, come la meridiana
tracciata su quella piazza, cui serve di gnomone l’obelisco; Lorenzo
Fazzini napoletano (1787-1837) che sviluppò molti fenomeni
dell’elettricità e introdusse certe eliche molto acclamate;
Zantedeschi, che al domani d’ogni grande scoperta si presenta a
reclamarne la priorità, quasi genio che intraveda le verità, ma senza
quella pienezza scientifica che le rende effettive.
Il botanico Giuseppe Raddi fiorentino, incaricato nel 1817 d’un
viaggio al Brasile, poi in Egitto col Rosellini, stampò sopra alcune
nuove crittogame; sulle quali il De Notaris studia in bella emulazione
col Moris, cui è dovuta la Flora sarda, come la Flora dalmatica al
Devisiani. Ciro Pollini la Flora veronese, la piemontese il Re, la
comasca il Comolli, la bergomense il Bergamaschi, la valtellinese il
Massara, la tirolese il Perini e l’Ambrosi che senza maestri si meritò
la stima de’ più illustri, la Pisana il Savi, che poi nella Flora italiana
(1818-24) raccolse le piante più belle che si coltivano nella penisola;
al Bertoloni è dovuta la prima Flora italica, cominciata nel 1815. I
veneti meneghini (Algologia euganica), Zanini, Massalungo; i
lombardi Balsamo-Crivelli, Cornaglia, Cesati, Garovaglio faticano
negli arcani di questa bella scienza, per la quale si segnalarono nel
napoletano il Piccioli, il Tenore, il Gasperini, il Parlatore. Molti
vegetali e insetti conservano il nome di Francesco Andrea Bonelli da
Cuneo 1748-1830 buon naturalista. Giorgio Gallesio fece la Pomona
italiana: il milanese Vittadini preparò in cera tutti i funghi. Mauro
Rusconi da Pavia portò luce sulla generazione delle rane. De Filippi
milanese sta fra’ megliori cultori del regno animale [291], di cui la
parte ornitologica trovò un acclamato cultore in Carlo Buonaparte
(-1857), e tutto un felice espositore in Giuseppe Gené. I molluschi
dell’Adriatico furono studiati da Stefano Renier di Chioggia in opera
che dopo trent’anni pubblicò nel 1816. Il bellunese Doglioni raccolse
e pubblicò gli uccelli della sua provincia, come il Carraro da Lonigo.
Il bergamasco Mangili (1767-1829) scoprì il sistema nerveo delle
mignatte e delle conchiglie bivalvi, illustrò i mammiferi soggetti al
letargo, la fecondazione artifiziale de’ girini, la circolazione del
sangue nel mesenterio delle rane e nelle branche de’ pesci, e
insegnò a rimediare coll’ammoniaca al veleno della vipera.
La zoologia, non contenta di svelare l’infinitamente piccolo, cercò in
grembo alla terra i frammenti d’un mondo perito, e secondo quelli
determinò l’età dei terreni. Il bassanese G. B. Brocchi (1772-1826)
oltre lo stato fisico del suolo di Roma, descrisse alcune località
d’Italia, e massime le colline conchigliacee subappennine;
preparando a indurre l’identità di formazione dei terreni terziarj non
dalla giacitura, ma da’ corpi organici che contengono. Morì al
Sennaar nel 1826. Scipione Breislak diede un’introduzione alla
geologia, e descrisse la provincia di Milano e la Campania, e mostrò
che i sette colli di Roma sono crateri di vulcani estinti. Da Gaetano
Rosina avemmo ricerche mineralogico-chimiche sulle valli
dell’Ossola, e osservazioni sul moto intestino dei solidi.
Marzari Pencati vicentino (1769-1830) descrisse i terreni veneti e
una corsa pel bacino del Rodano e per la Liguria occidentale; e
s’accorse che i graniti erano emersi dopo la deposizione de’ calcari
conchigliferi. Da poi la geologia trovò nel Napoletano passionati
cultori Nicola Covelli, il Monticelli, il Sacchi, il Pilla; in Romagna lo
Scarabelli, l’Orsini, lo Spada; in Toscana Cocchi, Meneghini, Savi; in
Sardegna Lamarmora; nell’alta Italia Collegno, Pasini, Zigno, Pareto,
Gastaldi, Curioni, Catullo, Stoppani, Sismonda; e cogli stranieri De
Buch, Dolomieu, Beaumont, Agassiz, Lyell esaminarono i nostri
terreni, ed agitarono quistioni animatissime. La emersione, predicata
da Beaumont, e già enunciata da Lazzaro Moro (vol. xii, pag. 585),
dovè cedere alla teoria del restringimento della crosta della terra,
prodotto dal raffreddarsi di essa. Nella geologia, perchè troppo
ancora conghietturale, difficilissimo è determinare il merito de’ suoi
cultori, talun de’ quali è appellato sommo, mentre altri lo dichiara
ciarlatano. Ecco in fatti il Gorini di Lodi uscire colla teoria del
plutonismo, che sventerebbe tutte le precedenti, e che in
conseguenza è da tutti i precedenti repudiata. E tanto sono squisite
le diligenze, che oggi si esigono dagli osservatori, che nessuno può
avventurarsi, non soltanto a diversi regni della natura, ma neppure a
diverse provincie del regno stesso; nè la scienza si fa progredire che
colla longanime perseveranza s’un punto solo, finchè verrà qualche
poderoso sintetico che valga a tutto riunire.
Molti scrissero d’agraria; Filippo Re che compilava gli Annali
d’agricoltura del regno d’Italia, il Ricci, il Malanotti, il Ridolfi, l’Onesti,
il Lambruschini [292] in Toscana, a Pavia il Moretti che diè fuori una
biblioteca agraria; come il bolognese Berti Pichat che riunisce una
farragine di cognizioni onnigene. Già prima il Dandolo avea trattato
della pastorizia, de’ bachi da seta, dei vini. Nicola Giampaolo
napoletano (1751-1832) scrisse un catechismo d’agricoltura e sul
rimediare all’immoralità derivata dalle ultime vicende politiche. Jacini,
trattando della cognizione de’ villani in Lombardia, cercò suggerirvi
miglioramenti. Agostino Bassi lodigiano (1773-1856) attese
all’educazione dei merini, propagò migliori metodi della vinificazione
e del caseificio; e le malattie contagiose volle dedurre da parassiti
animali o vegetali. Il Gera da Conegliano, il Rizzi da Pordenone, il
Freschi da San Vito, il piemontese Ragazzoni... adoprano lodevole
zelo a queste applicazioni: molti cercano il rimboscamento, molti il
miglioramento degli animali rurali: e gli studj di Giuseppe Gazzeri di
Firenze sugl’ingrassi recherebbero gran vantaggio, se la
popolazione nostra agricola gli applicasse. E società e giornali
ampliano queste discipline, dove ha singolar nome l’Accademia dei
Georgofili di Firenze.
La chimica, magistero d’analisi per eccellenza, che persegue la
materia sin nell’infima attenuazione, venne tra l’ultime scienze, e di
tutte approfitta per far ogni giorno passi tanto giganteschi, da
antiquare prontissimamente ciò che era fresco pur jeri. Le teoriche
del flogisto di Lavoisier furono schiarite e in parte combattute dal
savojardo Berthollet (1748-1822), sperimentatore diligente; il quale
credette le sostanze animali si distinguessero dalle vegetali per
l’azoto, conchiusione affrettata: studiò i clorati, e ottenne l’argento
fulminante, che dovea poi mutar il modo d’inescazione delle armi da
fuoco. Luigi Valentino Brugnatelli suddetto (pag. 541) credette la
teoria di Lavoisier non rendere ragione del calorico e della luce che
si sviluppano in certe emergenze, e ne trasse una teorica sua
propria, denominata termossigene. Trovati suoi son pure l’acido
suberico e l’eritrico; diede Elementi di chimica, i primi in Italia nel
senso delle teoriche francesi, e una Farmacopea, lodata anche da
forestieri. Porati migliorò la chimica applicata alla farmacia, e
dappertutto s’introdussero per applicarla alle arti.
Impadronitasi della pila, e collocato Davy al posto di Lavoisier, la
chimica potè elidere le maggiori affinità, nè trovò corpo che non le
cedesse il suo principio efficace, la sua essenza; donde le mirabili
teorie degli equivalenti e del dimorfismo, che abbattono quella delle
forme primitive, posta da Haüy. Gioacchino Taddei di Sanminiato
(1792-1860) cercò principalmente le relazioni della chimica colla
medicina e colle industrie, diede un prezioso trattato di farmacologia
(1819), coprì in Firenze la prima cattedra di chimica organica (1840),
migliorò i sistemi della metallurgia e della zecca, e molto occupossi
dei concimi. I begli studj di Giovanni Polli milanese e del Beltrami sul
sangue, le larghe applicazioni del milanese Kramer, del toscano
Gazzeri, di Lorenzo Cantò da Carmagnola, del Grimelli da Modena,
del Sobrero da Torino... non lasciano troppo invidiare gli stranieri,
sotto de’ quali eccellenti riuscirono l’Usiglio, il Canizzari, il De Luca, il
Malaguti, il veneziano Bixio, il napoletano Piria, il modenese Selmi. I
romani Viale e Latini nell’atmosfera scopersero l’ammoniaca come
sottocarbonaio ammoniacale, la credono dovuta alla respirazione, e
che sciolta dall’acqua, ricada colla pioggia sulla superficie della terra;
in opposizione a Boussingault, che crede l’ammoniaca dell’aria
prodotta dai temporali. Questa scienza aspira a divenire scienza
prima, e spiegherà arcani patologici e fisiologici mediante lo studio
de’ fermenti.
La medicina si fece migliore col distinguersi dalle affini in modo, che
ciascuna si migliorasse a parte, ed essa raccogliesse il frutto di tutte
per divenir sempre più vantaggiosa all’umanità. La fisiologia era in
fasce, nè i fenomeni della vita si investigavano che sulle orme di
Haller, e se ne curavano le alterazioni secondo gli istituti di
Boerhaave e di Van Swieten: alla scuola dell’irritabilità halleriana
alcuni opponevano la sensibilità; altri variavano nell’attribuirla a
questo o a quell’organo; e la combattuta insensibilità dei tendini fu
sostenuta dal trentino Borsieri e dal milanese Moscati (1739-1824).
Questi ben meritò quando, essendo preposto alla sanità nel regno
d’Italia, si raccolse intorno i giovani d’ogni capacità, ajutandoli a far
prova de’ loro talenti: ma egli distrattosi in variissime discipline, non
potè in alcuna primeggiare; il Borsieri applicò con maggior esattezza
l’irritabilità halleriana alla teorica dell’infiammazione, sbandendo le
antiche ipotesi dell’ostruzione, e squisite osservazioni esponendo
con semplicità.
Il cuore è l’organo più irritabile, eppure non ha nervi; prova che
l’irritabilità non risiede in questi. Così dicevano gli Halleriani: ma
Antonio Scarpa (tom. xii, pag. 596) ve li rinvenne, e mostrò non
esistere divario di struttura fra essi nervi e quelli de’ muscoli soggetti
alla volontà; non poter dunque conchiudersi che il cuore abbia
un’irritabilità indipendente dai nervi cardiaci; e questi tutt’al più esser
inefficaci ai moti di quello.
Intanto Guglielmo Cullen di Edimburgo derivava la febbre e
l’infiammazione da alteramenti dell’irritabilità; e questa teoria
diffondendosi, escluse le malattie umorali, e tutto ridusse al solido
vivo. Il toscano Vaccà Berlinghieri (1732-1812) lo affrontò,
sostenendo che gli umori non possono soggiacere a corruzione se
non fuori de’ vasi, ma che le alterazioni salubri o nocive del corpo
provengono da riazione dei solidi sopra i fluidi, suscitata da fisica
necessità; col che avviava al puro dinamismo e all’eccitabilità de’
moderni. Più lungo rumore levava lo scozzese Brown, che
distinguendo la natura morta dalla vivente, pone la salute in una
dose regolata di eccitabilità, stimolata dagli agenti esterni, sicchè le
malattie si riducono a due diatesi, steniche dove cumulo, asteniche
dove esaurimento del principio irritabile; e la cura nell’osservare
quanta capacità abbia il malato a sopportare il rimedio opposto.
Quest’apparente semplicità allettò molti, che non istettero ad
osservare se, come forse tutte le teorie patologiche, fosse dedotta
da principj a priori; ma sì poco cercavansi le fatiche di forestieri, che
sol dieci anni dopo pubblicata, Giovanni Rasori parmense (1766-
1837) conobbe a Firenze quella teoria, e cominciò sua fama col
tradurla e sostenerla con vivezza di parola, penna arguta, sprezzo
del senso comune, irosa beffa di chi la credea pura moda. Eppure
egli stesso la modificò, o piuttosto la invertì all’occasione della
petecchiale di Genova nel 1800, dove, vedendo morire i malati che
curava coll’oppio e cogli spiritosi, secondo il Brown che gli stimolanti
adoprava in tutte le affezioni morbide e fin nell’apoplessia, tornò alla
pratica del salasso e delle purghe. In allora al lemma di Brown che
tutto stimola, oppose una fondamentale distinzione de’ medicamenti,
appoggiandola sulla sua teoria, detta del controstimolo. Secondo la
quale, fondamento della vita sono l’azione esterna e l’eccitabilità
prodotta, modi della quale sono il senso, la contrazione muscolare, i
fenomeni della mente e della passione; l’eccitamento ha un’unità,
talchè non si deve curare questo o quell’organo ma l’insieme; i
farmachi sono stimolanti o controstimolanti, e come tali si applicano
alle malattie, che provengano da eccesso o difetto di stimolo. La
flogosi deriva da sviluppo di vasi venosi ingorgati, nè distrugge nè
genera parti organiche. Questo dinamismo trovò molti seguaci: e
Rasori lo sostenne colla pratica degli ospedali; sebbene poi sul fine
ammettesse l’azione specifica di qualche rimedio, come della china
nelle intermittenti.
La teorica del controstimolo fu elevata e modificata da Giacomo
Tommasini (1769-1846), che studiando la febbre di Livorno del 1804,
la febbre gialla ed altre analoghe, diede chiare idee della diatesi, e
formò una Nuova dottrina medica italiana, secondo la quale è negata
la debolezza indiretta di Brown, proveniente da eccesso di stimolo;
l’infiammazione è sempre stenica, cioè un processo vitale
consistente in eccesso di stimolo; e a flogosi vanno attribuite molte
malattie e febbrili e no, e acute e croniche, assegnate in prima a
tutt’altre cagioni. Riduceva dunque le malattie a stimolo,
controstimolo e irritazione; pure ne riconosceva alcune appartenenti
ad entrambe le diatesi: e l’uso della digitale e del tartaro stibiato, e le
prodighe cacciate di sangue resero famosa la scuola di
quest’insigne.
La sua dinamica organica segna una transazione fra la dottrina
dell’eccitabilità e quella del particolarismo o mistionismo, fondata da
Maurizio Bufalini di Cesena, il quale, invece d’accontentarsi delle
forze, come Rasori, ripudia tutto ciò che non sia materia e azione
chimica, e deriva le malattie da profonda e molecolare alterazione
dell’umano organismo; e così crea la patologia analitica. Più si
generalizzò la dottrina del francese Broussais, derivata ancora
dall’irritabilità halleriana, stimolata da agenti esterni, turbandosi le
funzioni se lo stimolo sia o eccessivo o deficiente: donde la
localizzazione primitiva delle malattie, il carattere stenico quasi
generale, l’infiammazione degli organi digestivi, e in conseguenza la
cura simile a quella delle infiammazioni esterne, cioè sanguigne,
bibite, ghiaccio.
Anche altri contraddittori ebbe il Tommasini, quali Giuseppe Giannini
da Parabiago (-1818), capo della clinica di Milano, che scrisse sulla
natura delle febbri (1805), contro queste raccomandò l’immersione
nell’acqua diaccia [293], gli acidi e il mercurio: lo Speranza di
Cremona, repugnante agli abusi del salasso, non meno che al misto
organico, all’omiopatia ed al mesmerismo, per attenersi
all’osservazione pratica: il Geromini, che attribuisce gli errori della
medicina all’ontologismo, e fonda la patologia sull’irritazione. Il
bresciano Giacomini alle dottrine della diatesi unì scientificamente
quella dell’elettività de’ medicamenti. Francesco Puccinotti urbinate,
clinico nell’Università pisana, proclamò la Scuola ippocratica italiana
o degli etiologi, unendo le dottrine positive dei vitalisti e dei
mistionisti, conservando la validità clinica col decoro
d’un’interpretazione scientifica, e accettando il progresso delle
scienze ausiliari. Ai diatesisti, che fanno passivo il principio della vita,
oppone gli atti spontanei naturali, e dalla natura medicatrice muove
nella Patologia induttiva; studia assai le epidemie; divisa una filosofia
medica, e traccia una Storia filosofica della medicina, versatissimo
come è nella conoscenza degli antichi.
Questo variare di sistemi fa ridere i lepidi, e fremere gli austeri; ma in
realtà la pratica riesce per lo più alle medesime conchiusioni, e chi
esaminò gli ospedali avverò che generalmente il numero de’ morti
sta a quel de’ malati nelle medesime proporzioni, sia quando si
svena, sia quando si lascia morire di pletora. Il ripetere che la scuola
italiana s’attiene all’osservazione più che alle teorie, crede molto ai
fatti, pochissimo alle opinioni, studia i fenomeni naturali, va cauta ne’
giudizj, indaga semplicemente il vero, e sfida abbastanza nelle forze
medicatrici della natura, esprime un desiderio più che non formoli
una teoria. I savj s’attengono all’osservazione, ajutata dai progressi
della chimica e dell’anatomia patologica, dall’uso dello stetoscopio,
modificando il trattamento a norma de’ sintomi e dell’individuo: che
se alla diatesi generale prevale la localizzazione, questa si fissa men
tosto sopra un organo che sopra qualche sistema. Certo è che nei
medici si fa sempre più indisputata la dignità [294] ed estesa la
coltura, molti occupandosi oltre la pratica, in ricerche proprie e in
conoscere le altrui; la diagnosi e il trattamento sono d’assai
migliorati; donde una quantità di medici buoni, mentre si deplora
manchino que’ famosi, che un tempo capitanavano od anche
tiranneggiavano la scienza salutare.
Fra i quali Siro Borda da Pavia gran fautore del controstimolo,
moltiplicò sperienze sull’acido idrocianico, sull’acqua coobata di
lauroceraso, sulla digitale e altre sostanze; Locatelli da Canneto,
ricusando le teorie per la pratica, combattè i Browniani; Antonio
Testa (1746-1814) da Ferrara, insigne per l’opera sulle malattie del
cuore, studiate pure dal piemontese Giacinto Sachero (1787-1855)
che professò la dottrina de’ polsi organici, introdotta in Italia dal
Gandini. Giambattista Monteggia di Laveno (1762-1815), autore
delle Istituzioni chirurgiche, il Paletta da Montecretese, che nelle
Exercitationes patologicæ moltissimi fatti e vedute nuove bellamente
espresse, onorarono lungamente la clinica di Milano, dove poi il
Verga approfondò le malattie mentali; nelle quali, dopo Chiarugi,
Baccinelli, Calvetti, Ferrarese, si esercitarono Gualandi, Bonacossa,
Monti, Bini. Lodasi il trattato di Brofferio sulla emormesi. Brera
migliorò la medicina jatroleptica, fondata sulla facoltà assorbente
della pelle. Fossati, Pirondi e principalmente Rognetta sostengono in
Francia l’onore della medicina italiana, come in Egitto Ranzi, Raggi,
Grassi, Gaetani, Morandi, in Turchia, Mongeri, in Barberia
Castelnuovo e Mugnaini. Eusebio Valli lucchese (-1886) studiò in
Oriente il vajuolo e la peste bubonica, innestandosela; e al fine
soccombette alla febbre gialla, che si procurò apposta all’Avana.
Rasori pel primo esperì una statistica medica dopo il 1712
nell’ospedale di Milano, per dimostrare la superiorità del proprio
metodo; e subito crebbero annali clinici, rendiconti, prospetti; viepiù
da che Tommasini, nella prolusione del 1821, parlò della necessità di
sottoporre a una statistica i fatti della medicina pratica, divisando
anche le classificazioni. Idea lodevole, ma nell’applicazione
riducendosi spesso a provare soltanto una teorica prestabilita,
diviene qui, come in altre materie, un giuoco di numeri.
La medicina legale ebbe ottime applicazioni; e vi attesero Speranza,
Gianelli, Puccinotti, Barzelotti (1768-1739), di cui si lodarono il
Parroco istruito nella medicina e le Relazioni della medicina
coll’economia politica; Omodei, autore del Sistema di polizia medico-
militare; Buffini che ragiona sui trovatelli, piaga del secolo.
Nuovi farmachi sono esibiti dalla progredente chimica, e tutti
semplificati, sbandendo le ricerche polifarmache; si voltano a sanità i
veleni più tremendi. Dell’innesto del vajuolo vaccino (t. xii, p. 598),
esteso per quanto contrastato, il ridestarsi delle epidemie vajolose
mise in dubbio la potenza preservatrice. Lunghi e pur troppo
inefficaci studj occasionarono il cholera e le migliari; e la pellagra, di
cui scrissero Cerri, Strambio, Marzari, Frapolli, Ballardini, Carlo
Gallo, Caldarini, Rizzi, Fanzago ed altri lombardi.
Gli stromenti chirurgici furono perfezionati, e molti ne introdussero
l’Assalini di Modena per l’ostetricia, il Signoroni di Adro per le ernie e
per avere primo tentato la demolizione della mascella inferiore. Il
Donegani di Como e lo Schiantarelli di Brescia ebbero nome per
operazioni intorno agli occhi. Paolo Mascagni sienese (1755-1815)
volle passare in rassegna tutte le scoperte astronomiche d’antichi e
moderni, e valutarne il merito; colle injezioni esaminò le parti tutte
della testura umana, principalmente vasi linfatici; nell’Anatomia per
uso degli artisti offrì le più giuste proporzioni del corpo umano ben
conformato e lasciolla postuma, come anche la Grande anatomia,
dove con incomparabile esattezza sono rappresentati gli elementi
del corpo. Si pretende volesse usurparsela quel côrso Antonmarchi,
che assistette agli ultimi momenti di Napoleone nell’isola di
Sant’Elena; e i professori Vaccà e Barzelotti si unirono al professore
Rosini stampatore per terminarla e pubblicarla a grave dispendio.
Fra gli anatomisti il torinese Bianchi intorno al fegato dissentì da
Morgagni; il Rolando pure torinese è arguto esploratore del cervello,
il Bellingeri del sistema nervoso e del midollo spinale, il Lippi della
comunicazione delle vene coi vasi linfatici, il Barbieri delle vescicole
spermatiche, corretti e superati dal vicentino Panizza, che la gloria
del Mascagni sostiene co’ suoi studj sui vasi linfatici, sul fungo
midollare e la depressione della cataratta. Porta mostrasi indagatore
sottile non meno che esperto operatore: il Corti esplora il magistero
dell’udito; De Filippi, Gastaldi, Pacini volgonsi principalmente
all’istiologia; Giuseppe Cantù cresce il museo anatomico torinese
con bei preparati in cera.
Tra i fisiologi, dopo il napoletano Tommasi, non potrebbero
dimenticarsi i veneti Nardo e Berti. Il Vittadini pretendea mutare la
teoria della visione, ad onta degli anatomici e dei fisici; alla quale
ricerca si volsero e Dell’Acqua, e Polli, e Cattaneo, e Trinchinetti. Il
Petropoli, che nel 1808 coll’Etiologia riprovava i sistemi adottati nelle
scienze fisiologiche, qui ricordiamo solo pel suo famoso paradosso,
Matematica e poesia condannate dalla ragione. Coi metodi di
Tronchina e Passeri si agevolò l’imbalsamazione; e gran rumore di
prose e versi levossi attorno al bellunese Segato (1793-1836),
allorchè annunziò poter ridurre lapidei i tessuti animali. Non trovando
soscrittori per trentamila lire onde pubblicare la sua scoverta, viveva
a Firenze lavorando da calcografo, esponendo i viaggi che aveva
fatto in Africa, e presto morì. Lo contraddissero il tempo e Giovanni
Rossi sarzanese, valentissimo operatore, che l’Università di Parma
arricchì di preziosi preparati, e primo in Italia eseguì l’esofagotomia:
ma sul modo di conservare i cadaveri e le carni mangereccie
volgonsi ora tante attenzioni, che fanno sperare la riuscita [295].
Francesco Aglietti bresciano, trovando a Venezia già preoccupati i
seggi dell’arte sua dal Paitoni, dal Lotti, dal Pellegrini, dal
Cullodrowitz, dal Pezzi, fondò il Giornale per servire alla storia della
medicina (1783), coadjuvato da Stefano Gallino illustre fisiologo e da
altri; e può dirsi instauratore dell’anatomia patologica. Pubblicava
pure le Memorie per servire alla storia letteraria e civile (1793), con
retti giudizj e buoni estratti di opere, e promosse la fondazione della
società veneta di medicina (1789) di cui fu segretario e presidente.
Luigi Valeriano Brera illustre clinico cominciò nel 1812 un giornale di
medicina pratica. Gli Annali a Milano furono tenuti in lungo credito
dall’Omodei, poi dal Caldarini e dal Griffini, ed emulati dalla Gazzetta
medica dello Strambio e del Bertani. E ne’ giornali moltiplicatisi,
meglio che in questi nostri cenni da ignorante, saranno a cercare i
nomi illustri d’una scienza, di cui, come della politica e con altrettanta
presunzione ed ignoranza, vogliamo parlare tutti, e che fu estesa,
quanto al passato, con copiosa erudizione dal dottore De Renzi
napoletano, arricchendola di particolarità e sui sistemi e sulle
persone: e meglio dal Puccinotti, mentre altre prolissamente sono
aggiunte alla traduzione della Storia pragmatica dello Sprengel; altre
ogni giorno compajono in sapienti monografie, fra cui vogliamo citare
quelle del Perini e del Ferrario.
Come Broussais localizzava le malattie, così Gall localizzò le facoltà
colla frenologia, alla quale non mancarono cultori e contraddittori in
Italia [296], benchè i più siansi accontentati alla codarda futilità di celie
ed epigrammi. Altrettanto avvenne dell’idropatia e dell’omiopatia.
Quest’ultima fu coltivata specialmente dal Rucco napoletano, e che
ito in Francia nel 1814, pubblicò i Nuovi elementi di materia medica,
e più tardi l’Esprit de la médecine ancienne et nouvelle comparée
(1846), e la Médecine de la nature protectrice de la vie humaine
(1855).
Fino dal primo estendersi delle scoperte elettriche, il veneziano
Pivati avea preteso potersi ottenere l’effetto da farmachi senza
introdurli nel corpo, e solo col metterli in bottiglie vitree elettrizzate. Il
mesmerismo risorse testè con nuove forme e nuovo corredo di
scienza e di fatti tali, da non poter più gettarsi da un canto come
fanciullaggine; e se è troppo lo sperarne portentose guarigioni nè
scoprimento di verità, offrirà ragioni di molti fatti che nella storia è
temerità il negare, sebbene non sia possibile spiegare. Fa vent’anni
noi proclamavamo che «coloro i quali ammettono solo ciò che
comprendono, e ripudiano ciò che non si brancica e taglia, trovando
le teorie fisiologiche inette ad abbracciare e spiegare i fatti
magnetici, li negano risolutamente: ma più che dai nemici, dalle
esagerazioni de’ sostenitori è posta in compromesso questa scienza,
che forse recherà tanta luce sopra l’azione nervosa.»
Davanti a questi avanzamenti delle scienze fisiche, allo smisurato
aumentarsene della potenza dell’uomo e del suo imperio sulla
natura, inorgogliscono alcuni: altri mestamente si domandano se tali
incrementi sieno civiltà, quanto ajutino il progresso morale e civile, e
se non diano viziosa prevalenza al sensibile sovra l’intelligibile.
CAPITOLO CLXXXVIII.
Belle arti.