You are on page 1of 4

PR NOTES CHAP 1

Research PERCEIVED EFFECTS OF ONLINE


(Re) - again GAMING ON THE ACADEMIC
- inquiry > problems, questions = PERFORMANCE OF SHS STUDENTS OF RC
Curiosities SY 2023 - 2024
(search) - to look for; to gather; to discover;
to find ● AIM - to know the perceived effects
● SUBJECT MATTER = Variables
SCIENTIFIC PROCESS IV - ONLINE GAMING = the one
1. Problem that affects
2. Hypothesis (RL/RS) DV - ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
3. Methodology/Data Gathering = affected
4. Data Analysis & Interpretation ● POPULATION - target group = SHS
5. Report Students
● LOCALE - place = RC
2 Classifications
● TIME FRAME - SY 2023 - 2024
● Pure Research - new knowledge
● Applied Research - product
1. INTRODUCTION
Quantitative - Overview = Background
> numbers = Variables
> effects, impact, differences = Population
> statistical treatment - Knowledge Gap = lack of information
> detached = RL/RS (foreign &
local)
Methods: descriptive, experimental, - Context of Locale
correlational, quasi-experimental, ex-post facto - Objective of the Study - re-statement of
the title
Qualitative
> words, experiences (extraordinary), personal 2. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
(SOP)
Methods:
- What are the experiences..
1. Historical - past
- How did they..
2. Narrative - retelling the story of the
- Yes/no if relationship
participants
3. Phenomenological - extraordinary
3. SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS
experiences
- Kung ano nasa sop, un din ilalagay dito
4. Case study - “in-depth” analysis of a
nakaparagraph form lang. 3 elements
case
should be stated here (population,
5. Ethnographic - “live with them”,
locale, timeframe)
“immersion”
- 1 para for scope, 1 para for limitations
6. Grounded theory - “new theory”
Scope
7. Discourse Analysis -
Delimitations - exclusions
substance/meaning of a certain
Limitations - cannot control
document or words
8. Basic Interpretive - themes/patterns on
4. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
the extraordinary experiences
- Identifies the specific beneficiaries and
the benefits that they will get when the
problem is solved.
- Always refer to the research title 2. Synonyms
- “What are the benefits or advantages of - parents who are studying ^
the study based on the SOP?” higher education
Format - Students / children
- Paragraph school for lawyers
- enumerated 3. Use reputable search engines/sites
Style - Google scholar; science direct;
- Hierarchy (position) pub med
- Importance (most to the least benefited) 4. Use Boolean Operators
AND OR
5. DEFINITION OF TERMS Ex: student OR parents; student AND
- Alphabetical list of important terms parents
- Only words/phrases that 5. Read, Analyze & Select sources
- Minimum of 5 - Click ‘cited by’ for more sources
- if more ‘cited by’, mas reliable
2 Types 6. Outline
● Conceptual/Theoretical Definition ● Law
- Basic dictionary or universal meaning - Definition
- Ex: nosebleed - bleeding of nose - Law school
chuchu - Law students
● Student-parents in law school
● Operational Definition ● Experiences of student parents in law
- How the term is applied/used in the school
study Key Terms
- Ex: nosebleed - nageenglish kasama 1. Summarizing
mo ganern - Main points
2. Paraphrasing
What to define? - Re-stating one’s ideas “in your
- Important words/terms in the title own words”
- Technical terms - Paraphrase muna ung source
na nakita mo, tsaka mag
CHAP 2 Quillbot or Chatgpt
3. Citations
Review of Related Literature
- Acknowledge the authors of the
- Intro statement
works we used in our study
RL - related literature - Citations = APA (American
= discussions (essays, articles), laws, memo, Psychological Association) style
circular ^ author, date
= from books, journals, magazines Ex: Freo, 2020
RS - related studies ● Beginning of the sentence
= research/investigations > abstract, - Freo (2020) stated that …
methodology, results & discussion - According to Freo (2020), … ; don’t
= online sources, journals, thesis, dissertations use sa start ng para kasi common
Rs - abstract, may word na effects - According to the World Health
Organization (2021) … ; ^ pwede kasi
Steps (in searching RL/RS) org
1. Key words ● End of the sentence
Ex: experiences of student-parents in - Modern technology …. (Freo, 2020)
law school ● If madaming authors, sa dulo na
ilalagay Ex: SHS Students = 467
- Ex: Acc. to the diff researches, ….. Sample = a part/representatives
(Cortez, 2019; Penafiel, 2019; Sevilla, of the population
2020; Freo, 2023) = 5 & above
- If same year: (Sevilla et al., 2020) sa Sampling = process of getting
end samples
- Sevilla et al. (2020) beginning = purposive sampling
Et al. = and others
- Cited by 3. Research Instrument
Ex: Oronce (1975) cited in Sevilla - Interview guide
(2020) - Validation process of the
4. Quoting instrument
- Copy the exact words of the - Role of the researcher
author > define a term
21 words;40 - Tools in gathering data
words > analyze a text ● interview
- Use quotation marks > questions
- Author, date, page number or ● Open-ended
paragraph number ● Yes-no
Ex: Sevilla (2020, p. 2) defined > multiple choice = many
options w/ 1 answer
sustainable farming as “.....”
● Checklist = many options w/ 1
5. Synthesizing or more answers
- Putting together diff. ideas
4. Data Collection Method
CHAP 3 - 2 methods that can be used
● in-depth interview (easier)
Methodology ● Focus group discussion (ex:
– use future tense researcher, 5 participants tas
1. Research Design kunyare 1st participant muna
- Basic interpretive will be used sasagot tas next na agad)
● Define (disadvantages: minimum data,
● How is it done? confidentiality, some are not
● Why is it the most comfy to share their
relevant/applicable in experiences w other people
your study? around)
- Describe the step by step procedure that
2. Research Participants you will do from getting permission from
- Target population the principal, to reaching out to the
- Participants (number, general participants and explaining to them the
description) nature of the research to be conducted,
- Sampling technique used etc.
(define, how is it done, and why
is it the most applicable in your 5. Data analysis
study - Use thematic analysis
- Criteria in choosing the - Definition
participants - Process (how is it done)
- Why is it the most applicable in
Population = target group your study?
Thematic Analysis = descriptive (common sense na description)
coding
= in vivo coding

6. Trustworthiness
- Lincoln & Guba (1985)
- Set of criteria for trustworthiness
of qualitative research:
a. Credibility (vs. internal validity)
> depends on the richness of the
data and analysis and can be
enhanced by triangulation (Patton,
2002), rather than relying on
sample size (DEFINITION)

b. Transferability (vs. external validity)


> generalizing a study’s results;
achieved thorough description of the
research context and underlying
assumptions.
> With providing that information, the
research results may be transferred
from the original research situation to a
similar situation

c. Dependability (vs. reliability)


> aims to replace reliability, which
requires replicating experiments, the
same results should be achieved.
> as this would not be expected to
happen in a qualitative setting,
alternative criteria are general
understandability, flow of arguments,
and logic.
> both the process and the product of
the research need to be consistent

d. Confirmability (vs. objectivity)


> includes an audit trail of raw data,
analysis notes, reconstruction, and
synthesis products, process and
personal notes

7. Ethical Considerations
- Consent
- Confidentiality
- Beneficence
- Respect for persons
- Justice

You might also like