Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Handling Customer
Complaints
▼ C2 Ensure and Monitor Customer and Stakeholder Satisfaction
Scope
This procedure describes the global process for handling customer complaints in Novo
Nordisk (NN) for pharmaceutical products and medical devices, hereinafter referred to as
‘products’.
A customer complaint is any alleged deficiency related to the technical quality as well as
the safety and efficacy of a product outside of NN’s control. The complete definition of a
customer complaint is provided in the Definitions section.
Any alleged deficiency related to products within NN control is handled according to [1].
All customer complaints must be registered in NN’s global complaint handling system,
CCGloW. The pharmacovigilance process is handled in another system according to the
process for handling adverse events and other safety information, see [2].
In scope
Customer ideas, see [3]. These are customer suggestions where no product
deficiency is alleged.
Product enquiries and other contacts with a customer that do not fall under the
definition of a customer complaint, see definition in the definition table.
If a user (and only a user, not a health care professional or a relative) can confirm
that a perceived problem is no longer a problem after he/she has been trained in
using the product, then the situation is not to be handled as a customer complaint,
see [4].
All customer complaints related to products within scope must be handled according to
the process described in this document. However, the following exceptions exist:
Concomitant products in adverse event cases are registered in CCGloW but not
investigated, as by definition they are not covered by the alleged product deficiency.
For technical complaints received from all NN sponsored clinical trials and non-
interventional studies investigating medical devices, exceptions from this procedure
are described in [7], [8] and [9]. In the event of clinical trial cases the following
sections do not apply: sections 2, 6 and 8.1-8.2; [7] must be followed instead.
Role Description
Affiliate complaint handler Personnel in NN affiliates or NN local offices in Regions
who are processing any steps of the complaint handling
processes as described in this procedure.
NN complaint investigator Personnel in any department in NN who are requested by
CCC to perform investigations of customer complaints.
Investigators can come from many parts of the
organisation, e.g.:
Product Supply and QA for Product Supply,
including the following areas:
o Diabetes Finished Products
o Biopharmaceuticals
o Device & Supply Chain Management,
including the Koriyama Factory in Japan
CMC Development and QA for CMC Development
Device R&D
Marketing
Regulatory Affairs
The procedure covers all steps in the process, from first receipt of the complaint in the
NN affiliate or local office (hereinafter referred to as ‘NN affiliates’) to closure of the
complaint case, including answering the customer.
Customer complaints are handled in NN’s global complaint handling system, CCGloW.
Process
The overall customer complaint handling process is shown in Figure 1, below.
All employees in affiliates that are handling customer complaints must have reading
access to CCGloW in order to receive replies from CCGloW and look up cases. This
includes affiliates which otherwise do not use CCGloW, i.e. affiliates that register
customer complaints via the Customer Complaint Form (CCF) [11].
The steps handled by the safety department are part of the pharmacovigilance process
and are therefore not covered by this document, see [2] and [12].
Quality Risk Management principles are applied throughout the complaint handling
process where the case is evaluated for its criticality; however, they are predominantly
present in the Registration, Evaluation and Investigation phases.
The process for technical complaints received from clinical trials is described in [7].
The NN affiliate receiving a customer complaint is responsible for the further processing
of the case. This also applies if the customer has bought the product in another country.
If the NN affiliate receives a customer complaint about a product that is not in scope of
this procedure, they should advise the customer to contact the marketing authorisation
holder for the product.
If a customer complains directly to CCC, CCC must forward the complaint information to
the NN affiliate in the customer’s country, with instructions to register the customer
complaint according to this procedure.
Technical complaints from clinical trials are reported directly to CCC and are, therefore,
registered by CCC, see [7].
2.1 Registration
Registration
What How Who
Affiliates Register the customer complaint in the global complaint
that are handling IT system [13].
online to Create an individual case for each customer complaint.
CCGloW A unique case number is automatically assigned to the
customer complaint case in CCGloW.
Personal data must be protected [14]. Only redacted
copies of documents (with personal data deleted),
including the CCF, can be attached in CCGloW where they
are available to other parts of the organisation than the
affiliate (e.g. on the Patient/Reporter tab, as attachment in
the Affiliate Update Log).
Affiliates Register the customer complaint information according [4].
that are not
online to
CCGloW
Suspected If the same complaint case covers more than one batch
products number of the same product, create a product sub form for
each batch number.
For durable devices, create one product subform per
complaint sample received. Affiliate
Create a product subform for each returned sample that complaint
could have contributed to the alleged fault. If in doubt, handler
register all returned samples as suspected (pen, Penfill®
and needle).
Liability If the customer complaint may lead to a liability claim,
claims inform the local legal department in the affiliate.
Reporting
What How Who
Reporting Report the customer complaint case to CCC via CCGloW
cases online [13].
Reporting Report the customer complaint via the CCF [11].
cases off-
line Affiliate
complaint
Reporting Report the customer complaint case to CCC within the
handler
deadline deadline stated in Section 9.
Inform CCC If the case requires urgent handling, send an e-mail to CCC
about urgent using the mailbox complaintcenter@novonordisk.com.
cases
Complaint samples must be sent to CCC for investigation. The only exceptions are cases
that can be handled as LIC [5] or as local NN investigator [6].
All customer complaint cases are initially evaluated by CCC, except cases handled as LIC
[5].
Evaluation
What How Who
Evaluate Evaluate the customer complaint case, regardless of
whether a sample is available or not, according to [10]. CCC
Significant If a significant product defect is suspected and the defect complaint
product may affect products which are no longer under NN’s handler
defects control, handle the case according to [18].
4 Investigation
In all customer complaint cases where a batch number is available, a batch trend
investigation is performed. In addition, all returned samples are visually examined.
Below investigations can also be performed by LIC [5] and local NN investigators [6].
Investigation by CCC is described in detail in [10] and [19].
Investigations performed by CCC
What How Who
Visual Perform a visual examination of all available complaint
examination samples.
Document the results of the examination in the case.
Batch trend Perform a batch trend analysis for all products where a
analysis batch number is available and initiate trend actions if
relevant.
Document the result of the batch trend analysis.
Determine Based on the complaint description, the visual examination
the need for of the complaint sample and the batch trend analysis,
further determine the need for further investigations, e.g.: CCC
investigation o Further investigation of the complaint sample complaint
o Investigation or analysis of reserve samples handler
o Batch record review for the relevant process step(s)
The investigator receives instructions for investigation from CCC via CCGloW. If an
investigator does not have access to CCGloW, instructions will be sent by CCC via e-mail.
Investigations must be completed according to the timelines described in [20].
For major and critical product defects, specific requirements for investigations apply as
described below.
For NN complaint investigators in Product Supply and CMC Development, the QA for the
NN complaint investigators must approve the investigation results. If the complaint is
suspected to be associated with, or caused by, production discrepancies, based on
investigations of the product, QA must review the batch documentation and any
potentially related nonconformities as part of the investigation to confirm or deny above
suspicion. If the batch documentation has already been reviewed in connection with a
previous similar customer complaint related to the same issue, a new review is not
required. If the investigator is a QA department in Product Supply or in CMC
Development, further QA approval of the investigation results is not required.
When the investigation results are verified, a reply text is created and the case is
approved in CCGloW.
7.1 Documentation
The affiliate complaint handler, the NN complaint investigator and the CCC complaint
handler must each ensure that their part of the customer complaint case is complete and
archived according to [22]. The original complaint from the customer (e.g. e-mail, letter)
is archived at the affiliate.
The required retention time for complaint samples is described below in Table 1, [25].
Stricter requirements apply to special cases, and these are described below in Table 2.
The requirements apply to CCC, affiliates and investigators. Other requirements for
archiving samples must be documented in written agreements with CCC.
The sample retention time is calculated from the date CCC approves the case for the first
time after the sample is received.
Sample
Case type Product
retention time
Drugs, needles and prefilled
Adverse events and technical complaints 3 months
devices
Adverse events and technical complaints Durable devices 3 years
Table 1 - Sample retention time
For the following cases, the complaint samples must be kept for a longer period of time
and for all products (except needles), the complaint sample must be returned to CCC for
storage:
Sample retention
Case type Product
time
Confirmed counterfeit, stolen or diverted products not
All 1 year
covered by any ongoing legal cases
Legal cases where the Legal department has requested To be agreed with Legal
All
additional investigations department
PumpCart® All 1 year
Table 2 – Sample retention time for special cases
The timelines for marketed products are indicated on the figure below and are described
in detail in the following sub-sections.
Figure 2 - Four timelines in the customer complaint handling process for marketed products
The timelines for investigators to complete their investigations are described in [20].
No. Title
1 019467 - (QBIQ Document)
Nonconformities
Term Definition
Serious Adverse Event A Serious Adverse Event is an experience that at any dose
results in any of the following:
Death
Life-threatening experience
Inpatient Hospitalisation or prolongation of existing
Hospitalisation
A persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a
congenital anomaly/birth defect
Important medical events that may not result in
death, be life-threatening, or require Hospitalisation
may be considered a Serious Adverse Event when,
based upon appropriate medical judgement, they
may jeopardise the patient or subject or require
medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of
the outcomes listed in this definition. Suspicion of
transmission of infectious agents must always be
considered a SAE.
The table below shows the classification of the severity of the medical consequences,
product quality and/or regulatory impact of a verified product defect
Classification Definition
Critical Considered to potentially pose a threat to the life, health or rights of
patients and/or to have regulatory impact. Includes complaints
regarding devices reported as serious adverse events or incidents if
they are considered to be related to the device fault.
Major Considered to have insignificant medical consequences and/or to have
significant influence on product quality. An adverse event cannot be
ruled out.
Minor Considered to have no medical consequences and no significant
influence on product quality.
Replaced N/A
document(s)
The section numbers and titles below refer to the present version of
the document.
The following specific changes to the process are introduced with the
present version:
Scope:
1. DELETED: Durable devices reported as > 6 years old do not
require reporting.
Applies to:
2. CHANGED from ‘All line managers involved (or with employees
involved) in complaint handling’ – to - ‘NN employees who are
involved in the complaint handling process’.
3. DELETED: The overall managerial responsibilities for the
process has been taken out.
Registration
5. ADDED: If the case has a classification or requires urgent case
handling for other reasons, send a notification to CCC by e-
mail to complaintcenter@novonordisk.com.
6. ADDED: If the customer complaint may lead to a liability
claim, inform CCC immediately by sending an e-mail to
complaintcenter@novonordisk.com.
7. ADDED: For cases with liability claims affiliate must inform the
local legal department
8. ADDED: The fact that attempts have been made to try to
obtain the complaint sample(s) from the complainant must be
documented (to address new requirement in updated EU
legislation: “Chapter 8: Complaints, Quality Defects and
Product Recalls”, effective 1st of March 2015).
9. ADDED: If relevant for the complaint type, collect any
auxiliaries supplied by NN with the product, e.g. syringes used
for reconstitution and vial adaptors.
Evaluation
10. DELETED: ‘If CCC has received information or assesses that a
customer complaint may lead to a liability claim, they inform
the Legal and Risk Management departments. In such
situations no destructive investigations (e.g. breaking the
product seal) may be carried out without acceptance from
Legal Department’.
Investigation
11. ADDED: The current requirement for initiation of a NC in
relation to major or critical product defects applies to faults
caused by any of Novo Nordisk’s processes.
12. ADDED: Completion of the complaint investigation is not
dependent on completion of the non-conformity.
13. ADDED: The requirement about QA approval also applies to
investigators in CMC Supply.
14. CHANGED from: ‘For complaints sent to Product Supply (e.g.
formulation, filling, inspection, packaging and labelling
departments) for investigation, QA must review the batch
record documentation and any non-conformity report related
to the involved batch as part of the investigation for
complaints to determine whether the nature of the complaint
could be associated with, or caused by, production
discrepancies. The investigation and QA approval will be
documented in the IT system for complaint handling’
– to -
‘For NN complaint investigators in Product Supply and CMC
Supply, the QA for the NN complaint investigator must
approve the investigation results. QA must review the batch
documentation and any potentially related NCs as part of the
investigation to determine whether the nature of the
Approval
15. DELETED: If appropriate, CCC states corrective actions.
Closure
16. DELETED: CCC must state in the conclusion of the
investigation that the product has been re-packed and re-
distributed outside the control of the Novo Nordisk supply
chain.
Reply
17. CHANGED from ‘Customer replies must be documented’ – to -
‘Document the customer reply according to local procedures.’
Archiving
18. ADDED: For legal cases it is specified that the stricter sample
retention times only apply in cases where the Legal
department has requested additional investigations to be
performed.
19. ADDED: In cases related to confirmed counterfeit, stolen or
diverted products and liability claims, the investigators must
return the complaint sample to CCC for storage for one year.
Timelines
20. ADDED: It is specified that the reporting deadline also applies
to follow up information.
CHANGED: Deadline for closing cases is changed so it is now
specified that the aim is to close complaint cases within 90 calendar
days from receipt of the complaint sample in CCC or, if no sample is
available, from receipt of the complaint case in Global Safety.
Rationale for N/A
document change
Replaced N/A
document(s)
Scope
Effective Date:
01-Mar-2018
This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is the
manifestation of the electronic signature.
Document signed by:
Initials Full Name
Meaning Date and Time of Signature
(Server Time)
nhxn NHXN - Nathalie Hélix-Nielsen
Author Approval 13-Dec-2017 10:45 GMT+0000
hpma HpMa - Haiping Ma
Quality Assurance Approval 13-Dec-2017 11:30 GMT+0000
esff ESff - Erik Steffensen
Management Approval 13-Dec-2017 13:01 GMT+0000
kalo KaLo - Karsten Lollike
Management Approval 14-Dec-2017 07:07 GMT+0000
qatw QATW - Monica Athwani
Document Release Approval 14-Dec-2017 10:15 GMT+0000