You are on page 1of 1

In this day and age, traffic safety plays a vital role in one’s long-term life quality.

It is argued by some that


adult valid age is the most important criterion when developing traffic safety by road. I disagree with the
given idea.

It is true that not only young person could trigger accidents but also the old could make it too. For
perfectly exemplified in Viet Nam, age-old traffic participants could do some unlegal harm activities such
as crossing the light, driving at the unpermitted pace that caused unanticipated accidents. In addition,
the age could not reflect exactly the different abilities of awaremess to comply with the traffic safety
rule. Therefore, it is easy to see that increasing driving age is not a optimal solution.

Several favorable practical measures could be implemented to avoid inccidents occuring in the road.
Firstly, the investment in the streets play an important part in secure life of commuters. This remedy
would be favorable because bad conditions in infrastructures could result in unexpected traffic
accidents. Secondly, schools and governments should facilitate regularly holding pratical courses as well
as enhanced lessons about transportation for locals to participate annually. This would enhance the
consciousness of people, hopefully leading to the healthy traffic environment.

In conclusion, I oppose the view that raising legal age is the most favarable aspects for us to take into
consideration as quality of infrastructures and transport perceptions outwegh this factor.

You might also like