In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in

specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages
outweigh the disadvantages?
Arrange = relocate = allocate
Workplace = works = offices
Shops = shopping malls = shopping center
Homes= residential homes = residential areas = housing estate
In this ever-changing world, it is obvious that planners have a tendency to allocate
shops, schools, offices and home in specific areas, which may be widely separated
from each other. While some people express concerns regarding its potential
downsides, I firmly believe that the advantages of this policy are far greater than the
potential disadvantages for the majority of citizens.
There is no deniable that relocating urban areas are likely to lead to serveralseveral
advantages, which are involved in separating shop, schools, offices and homes can aid
to create more quiet and safe neighbourhoods. For instance, in Australia, almost
residential homes are arrangearranged in a specific section that are sereparted with
shopping malls, schools and offices. These relocated housing estateThis relocated
housing estate is secure for childrens to walk and ride a bicycle for relaxation after a
long day. Additionally, this allocating can help for gorvernmentgovernments to
manage free transportation infrastructure to save the costs. This is because there are
many free trams in larger cities of Australia. One example to illustrate, thank to
separating schools, offices with shopping malls, entertainmaint areas, in Melbourne of
Australia, while there are many free tram routes to works and schools in working
hours, more and more free trams are offerd to shopping center and enterntainment
parks in the evening.
However, despite these benefits, it is still have some implicit drawbacks. Firstly,
schools and workplaces are almost located in center. This can lead to the pressure for
accommodation and living cost. For example, in Vietnam, people are likely to live in
urban areas to go to schools and works easily and save the time. Gradually, it has
shortage of houses and the cost of living becomes expensive. At a result, some
problems that involve to environmental pollution are rising.
In conclusion, despite a few potential disadvantages, this policy has many merits than
demerits. Therefore, on balance, we can maximize the advantages of this strategy
while minimizing its negative impacts.
In this ever-changing world, it is obvious that planners have a tendency to
allocate shops, schools, offices, and homes in specific areas, which may be widely
separated from each other. While some people express concerns regarding its
potential downsides, I firmly believe that the advantages of this policy are far
greater than the potential disadvantages for the majority of citizens.
There is no deniable that relocating urban areas is likely to lead to several
advantages, which involve separating shops, schools, offices, and homes can aid
in creating more quiet and safe neighborhoods. For instance, in Australia, almost
all residential homes are arranged in a specific section that is separated from
shopping malls, schools, and offices. This relocated housing estate is secure for
children to walk and ride a bicycle for relaxation after a long day. Additionally,
this allocation can help governments to manage free transportation
infrastructure to save costs. This is because there are many free trams in larger
cities in Australia. One example to illustrate, thanks to separating schools, offices
with shopping malls, and entertainment areas, in Melbourne Australia, while
there are many free tram routes to works and schools during working hours,
more and more free trams are offered to shopping centers and entertainment
parks in the evening.
However, despite these benefits, it still has some implicit drawbacks. Firstly,
schools and workplaces are almost located in the center. This can lead to pressure
on accommodation and living costs. For example, in Vietnam, people are likely to
live in urban areas to go to schools and work easily and save time. Gradually, it
has a shortage of houses and the cost of living becomes expensive. As a result,
some problems that involve environmental pollution are rising.
In conclusion, despite a few potential disadvantages, this policy has many merits
rather than demerits. Therefore, on balance, we can maximize the advantages of
this strategy while minimizing its negative impacts.

In contemporary times, urban planners frequently designate specific areas for

the placement of shops, schools, offices, and homes, which may be geographically
separated from each other. While some individuals express concerns about the
potential negative impacts of this policy, it is my firm belief that the advantages
far outweigh the potential disadvantages for the majority of citizens.
The relocation of urban areas can lead to several benefits, including the creation
of more peaceful and secure neighborhoods by separating shops, schools, offices,
and homes. For instance, in Australia, residential homes are arranged in specific
sections that are separated from shopping malls, schools, and offices. This
arrangement ensures that the housing estate is safe for children to walk and ride
bicycles after a long day. Additionally, this allocation can help governments
manage free transportation infrastructure to save costs. In larger cities in
Australia, there are many free trams available, and because schools, offices, and
shopping areas are separated, there are more free trams to shopping centers and
entertainment parks in the evening.
However, despite these benefits, there are some implicit drawbacks. Firstly,
schools and workplaces are often located in the center, which can lead to pressure
on accommodation and living costs. For example, in Vietnam, people tend to live
in urban areas to go to schools and work easily, which leads to a shortage of
houses and increased living costs. As a result, some environmental pollution
problems arise.
In conclusion, despite a few potential disadvantages, this policy has more
advantages than disadvantages. Therefore, we can maximize the benefits of this
strategy while minimizing its negative impacts. By carefully designing urban
areas to provide a more balanced distribution of shops, schools, offices, and
homes, we can create more livable, sustainable, and efficient urban environments
that benefit everyone.