Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook A New Hypothesis On The Anisotropic Reynolds Stress Tensor For Turbulent Flows Volume I Theoretical Background And Development Of An Anisotropic Hybrid K Omega Shear Stress Transport Stochastic Turbul ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook A New Hypothesis On The Anisotropic Reynolds Stress Tensor For Turbulent Flows Volume I Theoretical Background And Development Of An Anisotropic Hybrid K Omega Shear Stress Transport Stochastic Turbul ebook all chapter pdf
https://textbookfull.com/product/shear-love-1st-edition-m-k-
moore/
https://textbookfull.com/product/adhd-stress-and-development-
petr-bob/
https://textbookfull.com/product/engineering-of-thermoplastic-
elastomer-with-graphene-and-other-anisotropic-nanofillers-
abhijit-bandyopadhyay/
India and the European Union in a Turbulent World
Rajendra K. Jain
https://textbookfull.com/product/india-and-the-european-union-in-
a-turbulent-world-rajendra-k-jain/
https://textbookfull.com/product/yoga-for-stress-magbook/
https://textbookfull.com/product/defense-against-biological-
attacks-volume-i-sunit-k-singh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/economics-of-higher-education-
background-concepts-and-applications-1st-edition-robert-k-
toutkoushian/
Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications
László Könözsy
A New Hypothesis
on the Anisotropic
Reynolds Stress Tensor
for Turbulent Flows
Volume I: Theoretical Background and
Development of an Anisotropic Hybrid
k-omega Shear-Stress Transport/
Stochastic Turbulence Model
Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications
Volume 120
Series editor
André Thess, German Aerospace Center, Institute of Engineering
Thermodynamics, Stuttgart, Germany
Founding Editor
René Moreau, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Hydraulique,
Saint Martin d’Hères Cedex, France
The purpose of this series is to focus on subjects in which fluid mechanics plays a
fundamental role. As well as the more traditional applications of aeronautics,
hydraulics, heat and mass transfer etc., books will be published dealing with topics
which are currently in a state of rapid development, such as turbulence, suspensions
and multiphase fluids, super and hypersonic flows and numerical modelling
techniques. It is a widely held view that it is the interdisciplinary subjects that will
receive intense scientific attention, bringing them to the forefront of technological
advancement. Fluids have the ability to transport matter and its properties as well as
transmit force, therefore fluid mechanics is a subject that is particulary open to cross
fertilisation with other sciences and disciplines of engineering. The subject of fluid
mechanics will be highly relevant in such domains as chemical, metallurgical,
biological and ecological engineering. This series is particularly open to such new
multidisciplinary domains. The median level of presentation is the first year
graduate student. Some texts are monographs defining the current state of a field;
others are accessible to final year undergraduates; but essentially the emphasis is on
readability and clarity.
Springer and Professor Thess welcome book ideas from authors. Potential
authors who wish to submit a book proposal should contact Nathalie Jacobs,
Publishing Editor, Springer (Dordrecht), e-mail:
Nathalie.Jacobs@springer.com
Indexed by SCOPUS, EBSCO Discovery Service, OCLC, ProQuest Summon,
Google Scholar and SpringerLink
A New Hypothesis
on the Anisotropic Reynolds
Stress Tensor for Turbulent
Flows
Volume I: Theoretical Background
and Development of an Anisotropic Hybrid
k-omega Shear-Stress Transport/Stochastic
Turbulence Model
123
László Könözsy
Centre for Computational Engineering
Sciences
Cranfield University
Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
I dedicate this book with all of my respect to
the 88th Birthday of Professor Tibor Czibere
who developed the three-dimensional
similarity theory of turbulent velocity
fluctuations which is the further development,
extension and continuation of Theodore von
Kármán’s unfinished work.
Preface
vii
viii Preface
considered here to ensure that the conservation laws of turbulent flow motions
remain the same in any two reference frames. Therefore, we devote a particular
attention to the Galilean transformation and the derivation of the Galilean invari-
ance of the Reynolds momentum equation, the Reynolds stress tensor, the
rate-of-strain (deformation) tensor and the generalised Boussinesq hypothesis on
the Reynolds stresses. In addition to this, the consistency of physical dimensions,
the coordinate system independence of physical laws and the realisability condition
are considered as relevant criteria in the mathematical description of the Reynolds
stress tensor. The derivations included here make an attempt to bring closer a
theoretically demanding advanced subject to a wider audience.
In Chap. 3, the mathematical formulations of Menter’s turbulent kinetic energy k
and specific dissipation rate x Shear-Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model are
considered to provide a closure model to the Boussinesq-type counterparts of the
new hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor proposed in Chap. 5. The
k-x SST model is considered as a baseline closure model, because it is a
well-known fact that the k-x SST formulation is validated against many industrially
relevant turbulent flow problems with great success. It is also assumed that the k-x
SST turbulence model can capture the shear stress distribution correctly in the
boundary layer and it is applicable to adverse pressure gradient flows. However, it
is important to highlight here that any other existing eddy viscosity closure model
can be employed in conjunction with the Boussinesq-type counterparts of the new
hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor proposed in Chap. 5.
In Chap. 4, the three-dimensional anisotropic similarity theory of turbulent
oscillatory motions or Galilean invariant turbulent velocity fluctuations—recently
proposed by Czibere [1, 2]—is discussed in-depth as a necessary theoretical
background and requirement to understand the new hypothesis on the anisotropic
Reynolds stress tensor in Chap. 5. The three-dimensional theory of Czibere intro-
duces an anisotropic similarity tensor—which is related to the dimensionless vector
potential of the mechanically similar local velocity fluctuations—to distribute
anisotropically the principal (dominant) turbulent shear stress in the fluid flow field.
The elements of the similarity tensor can be computed with the use of a stochastic
turbulence model (STM) discussed in this chapter. It is important to mention that
certain components of the anisotropic similarity theory presented here—e.g. the
definition of the unit base vectors of the fluctuating natural coordinate system—are
discussed in a slightly different way compared to the original theory of Czibere. The
reason for that is to introduce a fully Galilean invariant formulation of the aniso-
tropic Reynolds stress tensor in Chap. 5.
In Chap. 5, a new hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor is pro-
posed which is relying on the unification of the generalised Boussinesq hypothesis
(deformation theory) and the fully Galilean invariant version of the three-
dimensional anisotropic similarity theory of turbulent velocity fluctuations dis-
cussed in Chap. 4. In addition to this, a possible anisotropic hybrid k-x
SST/Stochastic Turbulence Model (STM) as a closure approach is proposed related
to the new hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor for incompressible
turbulent flows. The derivation of a possible closure model in conjunction with the
Preface ix
compressible version of the new hypothesis would deserve another in-depth dis-
cussion as the subject of another theoretical book. It is important to emphasise that
the present work does not claim that the proposed anisotropic hybrid k-x SST/STM
turbulence model is better than other existing ones. However, the anisotropic hybrid
formulation of the Reynolds stress tensor in conjunction with the k-x SST/STM
closure model proposed here could be a plausible approach to the mathematical and
physical representation of the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor in the context of
anisotropic eddy viscosity models. Furthermore, the implementation of the final
anisotropic hybrid formulation can be done with a little additional computer pro-
gramming effort compared to the baseline k-x SST formulation of Menter. In the
second volume of this book, each detail of the implementation of the anisotropic
hybrid k-x SST/STM turbulence model—in conjunction with numerical simula-
tions—will be discussed in a way that the reader should be able to implement the
hybrid model in an in-house, open source and/or a commercial CFD software
environment.
References
1. Czibere T (2001) Three dimensional stochastic model of turbulence. J Comput Appl Mech
2(5):7–20
2. Czibere T (2006) Calculating turbulent flows based on a stochastic model. J Comput Appl
Mech 7(2):155–188
Acknowledgements
The author would like to give special thanks to Prof. Tibor Czibere (former Minister
of Education of Hungary, 1988–1989) for the fruitful discussions on the
three-dimensional similarity theory of velocity fluctuations and oscillatory motions
of turbulent flows. Therefore, I would like to dedicate the present work to the 88th
Birthday of Prof. Tibor Czibere with all of my respect. Furthermore, the author
would like to acknowledge the support of Prof. Karl W. Jenkins (Head of Centre for
Computational Engineering Sciences at Cranfield University) who provided a
creative working environment. My special thanks go to one of my former super-
visors, Prof. Árpád Á. Fáy, who gave me invaluable advices during the preparation
of the manuscript. My wife, Mrs. Martina Könözsy-Kovács, my son, Mr. Alexander
Teodor Könözsy, my mother, Mrs. Judit Veress Könözsyné, my father, Mr. László
Könözsy, and my aunt, Dr. Klára Veress, deserve a lots of appreciation for their
encouragement when I was working on the research subject and the manuscript of
this book. My special thanks also go to former Cranfield postgraduate students,
Mr. Adrian Dunne and Mr. Ionut-Andrei Cimpoeru whom worked together with me
on modelling external turbulent flows in conjunction with the application of the
three-dimensional similarity theory of velocity fluctuations and the stochastic tur-
bulence model of Czibere. In addition to my university teaching commitments, I
carried out the present research work at the University of Miskolc, in Hungary, at
the University of Siegen and the Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, in
Germany and at Cranfield University, in the UK, respectively. Therefore, I thank all
of my present and former colleagues and students for their support and encour-
agement which inspired me to write this book.
xi
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
1.1 Historical Background and Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
1.2 Governing Equations of Incompressible Turbulent Flows . . . . . .. 8
1.2.1 Mass Conservation (Continuity) Equations in the
Instantaneous, Mean and Fluctuating Velocity Fields . . . .. 8
1.2.2 The Navier–Stokes Momentum Equation in the
Instantaneous Velocity Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11
1.2.3 The Reynolds Momentum Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14
1.2.4 The Reynolds Stress Tensor and Its Relation
to Isotropic and Anisotropic Turbulent Flows . . . . . . . . .. 18
1.2.5 Mathematical Derivation of the Turbulent Kinetic
Energy Transport Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20
1.2.6 Reynolds-Averaged Governing Equations
of Incompressible Turbulent Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 28
1.2.7 The Generalised Boussinesq Hypothesis on the Physical
Description of the Reynolds Stress Tensor . . . . . . . . . . .. 29
1.2.8 Reynolds-Averaged Governing Equations Using
the Generalised Boussinesq Hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32
1.3 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 35
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36
2 Theoretical Principles and Galilean Invariance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 43
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 43
2.2 Basic Principles of Advanced Turbulence Modelling . . . . . . . . .. 45
2.2.1 Galilean Transformation and Invariance of the Reynolds
Momentum Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45
2.2.2 Galilean and Frame Rotation Invariances of the Mean
Rate-of-Strain (Deformation) Tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49
xiii
xiv Contents
xvii
Chapter 1
Introduction
Abstract In this chapter, a brief literature review has been carried out considering
those contributions which are aligned with the objectives of the present book. Since,
there are thousands of works dealing with internal and external turbulent flows, there-
fore, we consider a selection of those contributions which are relevant to the under-
standing of the new hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor in Chap. 5.
For the sake of completeness, the governing equations of incompressible turbulent
flows have been derived in conjunction with the generalised Boussinesq hypothesis
on the Reynolds stress tensor. Intermediate mathematical steps are included in the
derivations to make graduate and postgraduate students familiar with the heart of
the closure problem of anisotropic turbulence. The shortcomings of the generalised
Boussinesq hypothesis have also been discussed to emphasise the necessity of a new
hypothesis on the Reynolds stress tensor.
The origin of the proposal to a new hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress
tensor in this book (see Chap. 5) dates back to the similarity theory of von Kármán
[61–63, 68, 69] and the vorticity transport theory of Taylor [124]. During the 1930s,
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 1
L. Könözsy, A New Hypothesis on the Anisotropic Reynolds Stress Tensor
for Turbulent Flows, Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications 120,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13543-0_1
2 1 Introduction
von Kármán [64] worked further on the similarity hypothesis and Taylor [131] further
developed the vorticity transport theory. The homogeneous isotropic simplification
of the mathematical and physical description of turbulent flows was proposed by
Taylor [125–130], which is a significant simplification compared to real turbulent
flows occurring in the nature. The isotropic turbulence approach considers all normal
components of the Reynolds stress tensor are equal to each other and all non-diagonal
shear stress components are assumed to be equal to zero in the Reynolds stress
tensor. Taylor’s isotropic turbulence assumption could be valid far from any solid
wall where the effect of shear stresses is negligible. For turbulent flows, e.g. around
an aircraft wing or e.g. in a three-dimensional channel near to the wall, shear stresses
become dominant in the boundary layer. Therefore, an anisotropic mathematical
description of the Reynolds stress tensor is desirable to predict and model the physics
of turbulence correctly.
Theoretical and experimental investigations of the boundary layer and shear flows
have been in the centre of research interest since the begining of the 20th century
[110]. The semi-empirical analysis of turbulent shear flows originates from the eddy
viscosity hypothesis of Boussinesq [10] and the mixing-length theory of Taylor
[123] and Prandtl [107]. Theoretical analysis on the Reynolds momentum equation
for channel and pipe flows were carried out by Prandtl [107] and von Kármán [61,
63, 65, 68]. Simplified analytical solutions of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes
(RANS) momentum equations (Reynolds equations) relying on the semi-empirical
theories of turbulence can be found in the book of Shih-I [111]. Due to the mathemat-
ical and physical complexity of the statistical description of anisotropic boundary
layer and shear flows, Taylor [125–130], von Kármán [66, 67, 70], von Kármán and
Howarth [71], Dryden [33], and Heisenberg [47] focused initially on the develop-
ment of the statistical theory of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Taylor [132],
Kolmogorov [74–76] and von Kármán and Lin [72] investigated the spectrum of tur-
bulence. The two-dimensional similarity theory of von Kármán [61–63, 68, 69] and
its applications to internal flows were further investigated by Goldstein [40] and fur-
ther extended to compressible boundary layer flows over a flat plate by Lin and Shen
[90–92]. A comprehensive introduction to the experimental and theoretical develop-
ments in conjunction with semi-empirical theories of turbulent flows—including the
similarity theory of von Kármán [61–63, 68, 69] and the vorticity transport theory
of Taylor [124]—was given by Goldstein [41, 42]. The theoretical achievements in
the research field of homogeneous isotropic turbulence are discussed in-depth by
Batchelor [9], Shih-I [111], Leslie [89], Davidson [32] and McComb [96].
Note that the classical semi-empirical theories [61–63, 68, 69, 107, 123, 124]
can only be used for two-dimensional boundary layer flows where a simple geometry
is considered. Furthermore, the theoretical results achieved in the research field of
homogeneous isotropic turbulence can be investigated with a great success in grid
generated turbulent flows or in a periodic box mathematical model problem. These
physical circumstances do less likely occur near to the wall of an aircraft wing or
when three-dimensional shear flows in the boundary layer are concerned. Therefore,
the development of three-dimensional advanced turbulence modelling approaches
1.1 Historical Background and Literature Review 3
has to take into account the Reynolds stress anisotropy to make an attempt to capture
internal and external separating flows in a physically correct way.
Turbulent shear flows were investigated theoretically and experimentally by
Townsend [134]. Rotta [109] developed a statistical theory for non-homogenerous
turbulence. The results of the early development on the theory of non-isotropic turbu-
lence is discussed by Hinze [49]. Champagne et al. [18] carried out an experimental
investigation on nearly homogenerous turbulent shear flows. Oberlack [104] stud-
ied anisotropic dissipation in non-homogenerous turbulence. Bradshaw et al. [14]
focused on the boundary layer development through the turbulent energy equation.
Bradshaw [11–13] investigated the structure of boundary layers and shear flows
along with their engineering applications. A theoretical analysis of turbulent bound-
ary layer flows including the study on the governing equations and compressibility
effects was carried out by Cebeci and Smith [16].
The statistical description of turbulent vortical structures has also been in the
centre of research interest since the begining of the the 20th century [94]. Stochastic
mathematical tools in the field of turbulence research can be found in the book of
Lumley [94]. A comprehensive work on statistical mechanics of turbulent flows
was carred out by Monin and Yaglom [101, 102]. The theory of vorticity dynamics
was discussed in-depth by Tennekes and Lumley [133]. Since the wall is a vortex
generator, Smith and Walker [113] investigated the structure of turbulent wall-layer
vorticies. The dynamics and statistics of vortical behaviour of turbulence was studied
by Hunt [50]. Novikov focused on turbulent vortical structures and their modelling
[103].
We can distinguish four main groups of closure models for predicting the ele-
ments of the Reynolds stress tensor. The first group consists of algebraic, one- and
two-equation RANS engineering turbulence models relying on the generalization of
the Boussinesq-hypothesis. The second one is the group of Reynolds stress mod-
els (RSMs) which introduces closure approaches through the solution of Reynolds
stress transport equation to make an attempt to completely abandon the Boussinesq-
hypothesis. The third group could be considered as the mathematical and physical
description of the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor based on the three-dimensional
anisotropic mechanical similarity theory of turbulent oscillatory motions or Galilean
invariant velocity fluctuations (see Chap. 4). The fourth one is the group of hybrid
hypotheses on the Reynolds stress tensor (see Chap. 5).
Launder and Spalding [86] proposed and developed the standard k- two-equation
turbulence model to overcome the difficulties with the classical mixing-length
approaches and they assumed that the eddy viscosity is isotropic. An earlier work of
Jones and Launder [57] focused on the low-Reynolds number phenomena also with
a two-equation turbulence model. Daly and Harlow [31] derived transport equations
for incompressible turbulent flows in conjunction with the Reynolds stress transport
equation. Hanjalić and Launder [45] proposed a Reynolds stress model for com-
puting thin shear flows. Launder et al. [87] developed a Reynolds stress transport
closure model to take into account the Reynolds stress anisotropy which is known
as LRR model. Pope [105] proposed a more general effective-viscosity hypothe-
sis for two-dimensional flows which related the Reynolds stress tensor to a tensor
4 1 Introduction
ficulty is to preserve Galilean invariance of the Reynolds stress tensor due to the
complexity of the concerned flow physics. Langtry and Menter [85] pointed out
that the local correlation-based transition model, the four-equation transitional SST
approach, is not Galilean invariant, because of the mathematical formulation of the
velocity gradient along the streamline at the boundary layer edge. Grabe et al. [43]
proposed a transitional transport modelling approach to an accurate prediction of
the cross-flow transition for three-dimensional aerospace applications. One of their
modelling approach takes into account the local helicity of the fluid flow, therefore,
Grabe et al. [43] emphasized that their local helicity based transitional model is also
not Galilean invariant. Thus, the preservation of the Galilean invariant property of
RANS transitional flow models in their mathematical formulations could still remain
a challenge in their development.
The theorerical development of anisotropic stochastic turbulence modelling
including the investigations on fluctuations is in the scope of the current mainstream
research interest. Bakosi and Ristorcelli [5, 6] proposed and developed a proba-
bility density function (PDF) based method for variable-density turbulent mixing.
They highlighted the importance of the presence of small-scale anisotropy which is
a non-Kolmogorovian feature of turbulent flows under external acceleration forces.
Their approach considers a tensorial diffusion term to capture persistent small-scale
anisotropic fluid flow behaviour. The stochastic diffusion process in conjunction with
conservation law constraints was also investigated by Bakosi and Ristorcelli [7, 8]. It
is important to mention that the investigation of anisotropic properties of astrophysi-
cal turbulent flows is also a current mainstream research area. The spectral anisotropy
in the solar wind was discussed recently by Bruno and Carbone [15]. Theoretical
and practical achievements in the research field of statistical mechanics of turbulent
flows and their advanced modelling approaches were discussed in-depth by Heinz
[1], and Durbin and Pettersson Reif [35]. Statistical turbulence modelling approaches
in conjunction with classical RANS and advanced RSM models—widely used for
solving engineering problems—are discussed by Leschziner [88].
The three-dimensional anisotropic mechanical similarity theory of Czibere [22,
23] on oscillatory motions of turbulent flows is a key component in terms of the
proposal to a new hypothesis on the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor in Chap. 5.
The new hypothesis proposed in this monograph unifies the generalised Boussi-
nesq hypothesis with the mathematical and physical description of the anisotropic
Reynolds stress tensor relying on the three-dimensional similarity theory of the
Galilean invariant velocity fluctuations which leads to a new formulation of the
Reynolds stress tensor (see Chap. 5). The three-dimensional mechanical similar-
ity theory of turbulent oscillatory motions or velocity fluctuations [22, 23] is the
extension of von Kármán’s [61–63, 68, 69] two-dimensional similarity theory to
three-dimensional incompressible turbulent flows which is a completely different
approach compared to other anisotropic eddy viscosity models (see e.g. in [20, 21,
135]). It is important note that Goldstein [41, 42] mentioned in his book—in the
footnote on page 348—that the similarity theory of von Kármán [61–63, 68, 69]
is valid for three-dimensional eddying motion in general and the two-dimensional
description of turbulent oscillatory motions is merely a simplification. However, it
1.1 Historical Background and Literature Review 7
incompressible external turbulent flows were carried out within postgraduate thesis
projects [19, 34] from 2012 to 2014 at Cranfield University, in the United Kingdom.
∂ρT
+ ∇ · (ρT uT ) = 0, (1.1)
∂t
where the subscript ‘T ’ denotes an instantaneous value—which notation is consistent
with the notation used in [22, 23]—thus ρT is the instantaneous density of the fluid,
uT is the instantaneous velocity field, and ∇ is the Hamilton (nabla) vector-type
differential operator. For incompressible turbulent flows, the density fluctuation of
the fluid flow ρ (x, t) is neglected, therefore, the instantaneous density ρT is assumed
to be equal to the density of the fluid ρ which is a constant value. Therefore, the
general mass conservation equation of turbulent flows (1.1) can be written as
∂ρ ∂ρ
+∇ · (ρuT ) = + ρ · (∇ · uT ) + uT · ∇ρ =
∂t ∂t
=0
=0
∂ρ
= + ρ · div uT + uT · grad ρ = 0, (1.2)
∂t
=0
=0
ρ · (∇ · uT ) = ρ · div uT = 0, (1.3)
which can be divided by the constant density of the fluid ρ. Consequently, for
incompressible turbulent flows, the mass conservation (continuity) equation holds
the incompressibility (divergence-free) constraint which is assumed to be valid in
the instantaneous (turbulent) velocity field uT as
∇ · uT = div uT = 0. (1.4)
1.2 Governing Equations of Incompressible Turbulent Flows 9
Fig.
1.1 Reynolds
decomposition [108] of the instantaneous (turbulent) velocity vector
uT = u + u into the sum of the mean velocity vector u and the fluctuating velocity vector
u at an arbitrarily chosen point ‘P’ in the space of the turbulent flow field near to or far from a
solid boundary: x1 , x2 , x3 are axes of the physical coordinate system
In other words, Eq. (1.4) is the mass conservation (continuity) equation in the instan-
taneous velocity field of incompressible turbulent flows.
According to the Reynolds decomposition [108], each physical quantity in the
instantaneous flow field can be decomposed into the sum of a mean and a fluctuating
component, thus the instantaneous velocity field is
u T = u + u , (1.5)
where u is the mean velocity field and u is the fluctuating velocity field. The Reynolds
decomposition of the instantaneous velocity field (1.5) at an arbitrarily chosen point
‘P’ of the turbulent flow field is shown in Fig. 1.1. Note that Eq. (1.5) follows the
triangle law of vector addition in conjunction with the mean u and the fluctuating
u velocity vectors. Therefore, the velocity triangle of the Reynolds decomposition
(1.5) as shown in Fig. 1.1 may also be called as the Reynolds triangle of the turbulent
velocity field. In other words, the Reynolds triangle is a geometrical representation
of the Reynolds decomposition of the instantaneous (turbulent) velocity field (1.5).
The substitution of the Reynolds decomposition of the instantaneous velocity field
(1.5) into the mass conservation equation (1.4) leads to
10 1 Introduction
∇ · uT = ∇ · u + u = ∇ · u + ∇ · u = 0, (1.6)
which is the Reynolds decomposition of the continuity equation (1.4) in the instan-
taneous (turbulent) velocity field (1.5). For incompressible turbulent flows, in order
to satisfy the continuity equation (1.6) in the instantaneous velocity field, the mass
conservation equation must hold the incompressibility (divergence-free) constraint
in the mean velocity field u as
∂u 1 ∂u 2 ∂u 3 ∂u i
3
∂u i
∇ ·u= + + = ≡ = 0, (1.7)
∂ x1 ∂ x2 ∂ x3 i=1
∂ xi ∂ xi
where the equivalent symbol ‘≡’ denotes the use of Einstein’s summation convention
[36] where one can omit the summation symbol using the rules of Cartesian index
notation [4, 60]. The incompressible continuity equation must also be satisfied in the
fluctuating velocity field u as well as
∂u 1 ∂u ∂u ∂u 3
∂u
∇ · u = + 2+ 3 = i
≡ i = 0. (1.8)
∂ x1 ∂ x2 ∂ x3 i=1
∂ xi ∂ xi
The instantaneous vorticity vector T can easily be defined and introduced by taking
the rotation (curl) of the instantaneous velocity field (1.5) as
thus the Reynolds decomposition [108] is also valid for the instantaneous vorticity
field T , which can also be decomposed into the sum of the mean vorticity field
and the fluctuating vorticity field . The mean vorticity vector is the rotation
(curl) of the mean velocity field u as
∂u 3 ∂u 2
= rot u = curl u = ∇ × u = − e1 +
∂ x2 ∂ x3
∂u 1 ∂u 3 ∂u 2 ∂u 1 ∂u k
+ − e2 + − e3 ≡ i jk , (1.11)
∂ x3 ∂ x1 ∂ x1 ∂ x2 ∂x j
∂u 3 ∂u
= rot u = curl u = ∇ × u = − 2 e1 +
∂ x2 ∂ x3
∂u 1 ∂u ∂u 2 ∂u ∂u k
+ − 3 e2 + − 1 e3 ≡ i jk , (1.12)
∂ x3 ∂ x1 ∂ x1 ∂ x2 ∂x j
1.2 Governing Equations of Incompressible Turbulent Flows 11
where i jk is the Levi-Civita permutation symbol which is also known as the alter-
nating symbol [4, 60]. According to the vector analysis and tensor calculus [4, 60],
the divergence of the rotation (curl) of an arbitrarily chosen vector field a is equal to
zero as
div (rot a) = ∇ · (∇ × a) = 0, (1.13)
which implies that the divergence of the instantaneous vorticity field (1.10) is always
equal to zero, therefore we can write
∇ · T = ∇ · (∇ × uT ) = ∇ · ∇ × u + u =
= ∇ · (∇ × u) + ∇ · ∇ × u = ∇ · + ∇ · = 0. (1.14)
Relying on Eqs. (1.13) and (1.14), the mean vorticity field (1.11) and the fluctuating
vorticity field (1.12) are always divergence-free (solenoidal) vector fields for both
incompressible and compressible fluid flows as
The incompressibility of turbulent flows means that the instantaneous, mean and
fluctuating velocity fields relying on Eqs. (1.4), (1.7) and (1.8) are required to be
divergence-free, the fluid density ρ is assumed to be constant, therefore, the density
fluctuation function ρ (x, t) is equal to zero. Note that the mean velocity vector
u itself is not Galilean invariant, however, the velocity fluctuation vector u and
the instantaneous, mean and fluctuating vorticity fields T , and are Galilean
invariants [35, 96] (see Sect. 2.2).
∂uT
ρ + ρ∇ · (uT ⊗ uT ) = ρg − ∇ pT + ∇ · τT , (1.16)
∂t
where the symbol ‘⊗’ denotes the dyad (tensor) product and the twice underline
‘=’ refers to a second-rank tensor, ρ is the density of the fluid, uT is the instan-
taneous velocity vector, g is the gravitational body force vector, pT represents the
instantaneous pressure field. According to the Navier–Stokes hypothesis on the vis-
cous stress tensor—which was proposed for compressible flows—the instantaneous
viscous stress tensor can be defined by
12 1 Introduction
2
τT = 2μST − μ (∇ · uT ) · I , (1.17)
3
where the dynamic viscosity of the fluid μ is defined by the product of the density ρ
and the kinematic viscosity ν of the fluid as
μ = ρν, (1.18)
1
ST = (∇ ⊗ uT ) + (∇ ⊗ uT )T , (1.19)
2
which is a symmetrical tensor defined by the half of the sum of the instantaneous
velocity gradient tensor (∇ ⊗ uT ) and its transpose (∇ ⊗ uT )T . The unit tensor I
can be defined by the sum of the dyad product of each unit vector, and its vectorial,
matrix and Cartesian index notation forms are given by
⎡ ⎤
100
I = (e1 ⊗ e1 ) + (e2 ⊗ e2 ) + (e3 ⊗ e3 ) = ⎣ 0 1 0 ⎦ ≡ δi j , (1.20)
001
where δi j is the Kronecker delta [4, 60]. By taking into account the mass conservation
(continuity) equation (1.4) in the instantaneous velocity field uT for incompressible
turbulent flows, the Navier–Stokes hypothesis on the instantaneous viscous stress
tensor (1.17) will be simplified to
τT = 2μST , (1.21)
which means that the instantaneous viscous stress tensor is proportional to the instan-
taneous rate-of-strain (deformation) tensor (1.19) for incompressible turbulent flows.
To obtain the vectorial form of the Navier–Stokes equations in the instantaneous
(turbulent) velocity field—through the instantaneous general Cauchy momentum
equation (1.16) and the viscous stress tensor (1.21)—the tensor divergence of the
instantaneous viscous stress tensor (1.21) has to be derived. In order to take the tensor
divergence of the viscous stress tensor (1.21), the following vector identity has to be
considered by
∇ · (∇ ⊗ a) + (∇ ⊗ a)T = ∇ 2 a + ∇ (∇ · a) , (1.22)
which is valid for any arbitrarily chosen a vector field, and where ∇ 2 denotes the
scalar-type second-order Laplace differential operator. By setting a = uT and taking
under consideration that the dynamic viscosity of the fluid (1.18) is constant for
incompressible turbulent flows, the tensor divergence of the instantaneous viscous
stress tensor (1.21) can be derived by
1.2 Governing Equations of Incompressible Turbulent Flows 13
1
Div τT = ∇ · τT = ∇ · 2μST = ∇ · 2μ (∇ ⊗ uT ) + (∇ ⊗ uT )T =
2
= μ∇ · (∇ ⊗ uT ) + (∇ ⊗ uT )T = μ∇ 2 uT + μ∇(∇ · uT ), (1.23)
=0
where the second vector divergence term on the right hand side vanishes due to the
mass conservation (continuity) equation (1.4) or incompressibility (divergence-free)
constraint (1.4) in the instantaneous velocity field uT . Consequently, the tensor diver-
gence of the instantaneous viscous stress tensor (1.23) for incompressible turbulent
flows can finally be written as
Div τT = ∇ · τT = μ∇ 2 uT . (1.24)
The substitution of the tensor divergence (1.24) into the instantaneous general Cauchy
momentum equation (1.16) leads to the vectorial form of the Navier–Stokes equations
in the instantaneous velocity field uT as
∂uT
ρ + ρ∇ · (uT ⊗ uT ) = ρg − ∇ pT + μ∇ 2 uT . (1.25)
∂t
Note that the convective/advective term of the instantaneous Navier–Stokes equation
(1.25) can be written in different mathematical forms. By considering the vector
identity for the conservative mathematical form of the convective term on the left
hand side of the Navier–Stokes equation (1.25) as
∇ · (a ⊗ b) = (∇ · a) b + (a · ∇) b = (∇ · a) b + a · (∇ ⊗ b) , (1.26)
∇ · (uT ⊗ uT ) = (∇ · uT ) uT + (uT · ∇) uT =
=0
= (uT · ∇) uT = uT · (∇ ⊗ uT ) , (1.27)
thus the vectorial form the instantaneous Navier–Stokes equation (1.25) through the
convective/advective term (1.27) can be expressed by
∂uT
ρ + ρ (uT · ∇) uT = ρg − ∇ pT + μ∇ 2 uT , (1.28)
∂t
which can also be written as
∂uT
ρ + ρuT · (∇ ⊗ uT ) = ρg − ∇ pT + μ∇ 2 uT . (1.29)
∂t
14 1 Introduction
Note that the vector identity (1.26) holds for the mean velocity field u and the
fluctuating velocity field u by taking into account the mass conservation (continuity)
equations (1.7) and (1.8), respectively. Therefore, we can write
∇ · (u ⊗ u) = (∇ · u) u + (u · ∇) u = (u · ∇) u = u · (∇ ⊗ u) , (1.30)
=0
The equalities (1.30) and (1.31) will be employed subsequently when the mathemat-
ical description of the convective term will be considered.
For incompressible turbulent flows, Reynolds [108] assumed that the Navier–Stokes
equations are valid in the instantaneous velocity field (1.5). Therefore, taking into
account that the density of the fluid ρ is constant for incompressible flows, the
instantaneous Navier–Stokes momentum equation (1.25) can be written with invari-
ant (Gibbs) notation in the form as
∂ (ρuT )
+ ∇ · (ρuT ⊗ uT ) = ρg − ∇ pT + μ∇ 2 uT . (1.32)
∂t
The Reynolds decomposition [108] is assumed to be valid for the instantaneous
velocity and pressure fields as well as
u T = u + u , and pT = p + p . (1.33)
At this point, the time-averaging procedure of Reynolds [108, 111] has to be used,
which can be denoted with overbars, and the time-averaged form of the momentum
equation (1.35) can be written formally as
∂ ρ(u + u )
+ ∇ · ρ(u ⊗ u) + ρ(u ⊗ u ) + ρ(u ⊗ u) + ρ(u ⊗ u ) =
∂t
= ρg − ∇( p + p ) + μ∇ 2 (u + u ), (1.36)
uT = u + u = u +
u = u. (1.37)
=0
The time-averaged dyad (tensor) product of the mean velocity field u in the momen-
tum equation (1.36) can be expressed by
u ⊗ u = u ⊗ u = u ⊗ u, (1.38)
and the second and third tensors on the left hand side of the formally written time-
averaged momentum equation (1.36) are
u ⊗ u = u ⊗
u = O, and u ⊗ u =
u ⊗ u = O, (1.39)
=0 =0
where O is the second-rank zero tensor. The physical meaning of Eq. (1.39) is that
there is no statistical correlation between the time-averaged tensor product of the
mean velocity field u and the fluctuating velocity field u . However, Reynolds [108]
assumed that there is a statistical correlation between the time-averaged tensor prod-
uct of the fluctuating velocity field u , which leads to a second-rank non-zero tensor
by
u ⊗ u = u ⊗ u = O. (1.40)
pT = p + p = p + p = p. (1.41)
=0
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
again.’ She then drew back and veiled her face as her father
approached, followed by Embarek and the two prisoners.
Addressing the latter, Sheikh Shashon said, ‘At the intercession of
João, whom I take to-morrow to the Court to enter the service of our
Lord and Master, as gunsmith, your lives are spared and your fetters
shall be removed. You will be taken with João to the Sultan, and
upon His Majesty’s decision your fate will depend. I swear, however,
that if you attempt to escape, no mercy shall be shown you.’
‘Take them,’ he continued to the slave, ‘to your hut and lock them
in; but remove their fetters. Let them have food from my kitchen that
they may feel well and strong for the journey to-morrow. Put a couch
for João in the courtyard: he is my guest, free to come and go as he
pleases.’ Then turning towards Rahma, he said, smiling, ‘All this I do
to please you, my loved daughter.’
‘May God bless her!’ cried João and his companions.
Early on the following morning the Sheikh mounted a fine mule,
and the prisoners the animals prepared for them; whilst, destined as
a present to the Sultan, the famous gray mare, adorned with a
handsome headstall, was led by a slave.
Rahma appeared on the threshold, muffled in her ‘haik’; but
before João left she managed, when her father’s back was turned, to
unveil her face, and drawing from her bosom, where she had hidden
them, the silver chain and cross, pressed them to her lips: which
gesture João acknowledged by raising towards heaven the finger
upon which he wore her ring.
Sheikh Shashon despatched a courier to the Court to announce
their advent, and fearing lest some enemy in the village might
forestall him, he wrote to the Uzir that he was bringing the gunsmith
João and two other Nazarenes, prisoners, to deliver them to his Lord
and Master the Sultan, to be dealt with as His Majesty might please.
When within a few hours’ journey of the capital a Kaid of the
Sultan’s body-guard, sent expressly by His Majesty, arrived with an
order to the Sheikh to the effect that every care should be taken of
João, and to inform the latter that a house and forge, where he could
work, had already been prepared for him, and that the two other
prisoners were to be lodged for the present in the same dwelling.
The Kaid also informed the Sheikh that His Majesty commended his
conduct in having brought João safely to the Court, and that the
Sheikh was therefore regarded favourably by his Lord and Master.
On his arrival João was taken before the Sultan, who informed
him that he would be provided with ‘mona’ (provisions), and a
dwelling near the palace; that the implements of a smith and piles of
old horse-shoes were also ready, and that for every gun-barrel João
made, ten ducats would be paid him. The Sultan added, ‘If you will
become one of the Faithful, I have ordered that the garments of a
Moslem be given you.’
João thanked His Majesty and replied, ‘I accept with pleasure
your Majesty’s offer of Moorish garments to replace the tattered
clothing I now wear.’
Whilst thus accepting the Sultan’s offer, João vowed in his heart
that, though assuming the outward garb of a Mohammedan in the
hope of obtaining Rahma hereafter as his wife, he would remain
always a true Catholic, and hope for the day when he would return to
the land of his forefathers.
João was very industrious, and with the assistance only of the two
Portuguese, his fellow-prisoners—for he did not wish the Moors to
discover the secret of his art—he was enabled to manufacture a
number of barrels, even before the Sheikh left the Court.
On March 25, 1873, Sir John, four ladies, and seven gentlemen
embarked on board H.M.S. Lively for Mazagan, en route for
Marákesh. Mazagan, which was reached the following forenoon, has
a picturesque appearance from the sea; but of itself is an
uninteresting town. The country surrounding it is flat and sandy, with
only a few palm-trees and the cupolas of scattered sanctuaries, or
saint-houses, to relieve the monotony of the scenery.
The entrance to the landing-place was by a passage through a
curious old Portuguese breakwater, repaired some years previously
by the Moorish Government at Sir John’s instigation. On landing
under the customary salute, Sir John was welcomed by the
Governor and authorities, who conducted him to the dwelling
prepared for the Mission,—a house standing on what had been,
during the occupation of Mazagan by the Portuguese in the
seventeenth century, the site of a church. Its steeple, now used as a
belvedere, is still standing.
The Sultan had sent a liberal supply of saddle and baggage
animals, and a few extra tents of handsome Moorish make, lined and
decorated within in different coloured cloths. With these were a body
of a dozen ‘fraijia,’ tent-pitchers, attached to his army. These men
proved most efficient and did their work smartly and thoroughly. They
were all, without exception, Bokhári.
The Mission left Mazagan early on the 28th. The escort consisted
of a Kaid Erha and seven officers, with some thirty troopers. ‘Kaid
Erha,’ it may be explained, means ‘the Commander of a Mill,’ as,
during campaigns in Morocco, a hand-mill for grinding corn is allotted
to every thousand men. Hence the title of Kaid Erha given to every
officer in command of a thousand. Kaid el Mia, or Kaid of a hundred,
is the next grade, corresponding to the centurion of the Romans.
Besides this escort, Sir John had with him his own faithful body-
guard of half a dozen men chosen from amongst the Suanni hunters,
men upon whom he could depend in any emergency.
There was no important departure on the journey to Marákesh
from the routine observed on entering the successive provinces. On
each occasion the ‘Bashador’ was received by the Governor or
Khalífa with an escort varying in number, according to the strength
and importance of the province, from about twenty-five to a hundred
men, who invariably indulged in a prolonged display of ‘lab el barod,’
with the inevitable concomitants of dust, noise, and delay. Each
evening too, on arrival in camp, supplies of food in the form of ‘mona’
were brought and presented with the usual formalities. The Sheikh
offered the ‘mona’ in the name of the Sultan, and Sir John always
made a little speech of thanks to the donors.
The route followed for the next two days lay in a south-west
direction, over an undulating country cultivated with wheat, barley,
beans, and maize; and men were ploughing with oxen, or sometimes
even with a camel and donkey yoked together. A little girl followed
each plough dropping ‘dra,’ or millet-seed, into the furrows. Maize is
one of the chiefs exports, since the prohibition of its exportation was
removed at the instance of Sir John in 1871. The soil was a rich,
dark, sandy loam, thickly studded with limestones: these had, in
some parts, been removed and piled up, forming rubble walls round
the crops. Fig-trees and a few palms, scattered here and there,
scarcely relieved the flatness of the landscape.
On entering the hilly country of Erhamna on April 2, two horsemen
of Dukála, with a couple of falcons, joined the cavalcade. They told
Sir John that they had received orders from the Sultan to show him
some sport; but they expressed their fear that the birds would not
strike the game, as it was the moulting season and they were not in
good feather.
A line of horsemen was formed, and, after riding half an hour, a
‘kairwan’ or stone plover was started. The falcon was thrown up, and
soon stooped but missed her quarry. The plover seemed so
paralysed by the attack that it settled in the grass, and was only
compelled with difficulty by the horsemen to rise. In the second flight
the falcon struck the plover, whose throat was cut, and the hawk was
given a few drops of blood. Another trial was made, but the hawks
seemed dull, and only came back and lighted near their masters.
The falconers therefore were dismissed with a gift and many thanks.
Thus the hopes we had entertained of finding a great bustard and
pursuing it with the falcons was not realised, as none were met with.
But, on the return of the sportsmen to the regular track, Miss A. Hay,
who had remained near Lady Hay’s litter, informed them that she
had seen several of these gigantic birds, which had crossed their
path.
Hunting with falcons is in Morocco a Royal sport, and no subject
of the Sultan, unless he be a member of the Royal family, can hunt
with them, without being especially granted the privilege. A few years
before this, the Sultan sent Sir John a gift of two falcons—and with
them a falconer, capable of catching and training others, to instruct
him in the sport. The novelty proved interesting for a time; but in
comparison with pig-sticking, coursing and shooting, it was found
wanting, and the falcons soon ceased to be more than mere pets at
the Legation.
Sir John, who was a great admirer of these birds, used to relate
the following legend and its curious verification in his own personal
experience.