Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download pdf Advances In Gear Design And Manufacture 1St Edition Stephen P Radzevich Editor ebook full chapter
Download pdf Advances In Gear Design And Manufacture 1St Edition Stephen P Radzevich Editor ebook full chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/gear-cutting-tools-science-and-
engineering-second-edition-radzevich/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-carpet-manufacture-
k-k-goswami/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cam-design-and-manufacture-
second-edition-jensen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/optimum-design-and-manufacture-
of-wood-products-etele-csanady/
Management [Canadian Edition] Stephen P. Robbins
https://textbookfull.com/product/management-canadian-edition-
stephen-p-robbins/
https://textbookfull.com/product/management-16e-stephen-p-
robbins/
https://textbookfull.com/product/engineering-textiles-
integrating-the-design-and-manufacture-of-textile-products-
second-edition-elmogahzy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/critique-in-design-and-
technology-education-1st-edition-p-john-williams/
https://textbookfull.com/product/astronomy-for-dummies-4th-
edition-stephen-p-maran/
Advances in Gear Design
and Manufacture
Advances in Gear Design
and Manufacture
Edited by
Stephen P. Radzevich
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the
validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the
copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to
publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let
us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or
utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including pho-
tocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission
from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users.
For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been
arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................ vii
Editor................................................................................................................................................ix
Contributors.....................................................................................................................................xi
Introduction.................................................................................................................................. xiii
11. A Brief Overview on the Evolution of Gear Art: Design and Production
of Gears, Gear Science........................................................................................................ 417
Stephen P. Radzevich
v
vi Contents
The author would like to recognize Jonathan Plant, Executive Editor for Mechanical
Engineering, and Ed Curtis, Project Editor, as well as the rest of the team at Taylor &
Francis/CRC Press for their patience and efforts in publishing this book.
vii
Editor
ix
Contributors
Dimitar Karaivanov
Bulgaria
xi
Introduction
James C. Maxwell
Historical Background
Gears and gear transmissions have been extensively used by human beings for centuries.
Lots of practical experience in design, manufacture, and application of gears and gear drives
has accumulated in the industry to this end. An enormous amount of the research in the
field has been carried out, both from the theory side as well as from the experimental side.
All the experience in the field of gearing is summarized in a few fundamental monographs.
However, novel attempts have been undertaken in recent years, and important new results
of the research have been obtained in the field of gearing. Nowadays, gear science is still
extensively evolving.
xiii
xiv Introduction
Intended Audience
This book is written by top level gear experts and for gear experts, that is, for the gear
manufacturers, gear designers, and gear customers, and those used to advanced designs
of gears and gear transmissions: first of all, of gear drives with a highest possible power
density (or, in other words, “power-to-weight ratio”), and low noise (or almost “noiseless”)
gear transmissions. Post gear engineers and gear researchers from the industry, as well as
graduate students, will benefit from the book.
contact of a gear and a mating pinion tooth flank are determined, and important properties
of Cnf R(G|P ) at the point of contact of a gear and a mating pinion tooth flank are outlined.
This chapter of the book ends with the discussion of the converse indicatrix of conformity at
the point of contact of a gear and a mating pinion tooth flank in the first order of tangency.
Chapter 5, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Conformal
Gears,” is contributed by Prof. R. W. Snidle and Prof. H. P. Evans of
the UK, who are well-known experts in the area of EHD lubrication
in mechanics in general, and in gearing in particular. At the
beginning of the chapter, a brief introduction to elastohydrodynamic
lubrication (further “EHD lubrication,” for simplicity) is outlined.
This is followed by a detailed discussion of the conditions for
EHL film-forming in conformal gears; detailed contact geometry,
kinematics, load and Hertzian pressure; and ends with the analysis
of the Chittenden et al. film thickness formulas. An example on
the steps in the film thickness calculation for a typical gear set
is provided. Operating conditions, principal radii of relative
curvature at the tooth contact, normal load at the contact, Hertzian
contact dimensions, maximum Hertzian pressure, entraining
velocity, and predicted film thickness values are covered in this
example. The chapter ends with the discussion section, notation
section, and references.
Chapter 6, a contribution in the field of gear drive engineering is
written by Dr. Boris M. Klebanov, a well-known expert in the field.
Disc type gears and design of large gears are covered in the “Gear
Body Design” section of this chapter. This discussion is followed
by a section called “Gear-Shaft Connections.” In this section, both
fixed and movable connections are discussed. Then, compliance of
shafts and bearings is discussed to the best possible extent. Bending
of the shafts, and influence of the shaft’s bearings are considered. A
separate section of the chapter is devoted to the analysis of the gear
housing deformations. This analysis is followed by the discussion
of planetary gear drives. Improvement of relative accuracy, flexible
supports of planet gears, floating sun gears, along with floating
ring gears are considered here. This chapter of the book ends with
the detailed discussion of toothing improvements of cylindrical
involute gears. Transverse contact ratio in spur gearings, tooth
profile modification of spur gears, meshing geometry of helical
gears, as well as tooth root design are covered in this section of
the chapter. The chapter is complemented by the list of references.
Chapter 7 is written by Dr. Konstantin S. Ivanov of Kazakhstan,
a leading expert in the field of continuously variable transmissions
(CVTs). In his chapter titled “Adaptive Gear Variators (CVTs),” a
novel principle of creation of an adaptive gear variator is disclosed.
The chapter begins with the analysis of the structure of the basic
kinematic chain of gear variators, and kinematics of a basic initial
kinematic chain. Special attention is given to the force analysis
of an initial kinematic chain of a gear variator. This discussion
includes, but is not limited to, the consideration of the effect of force
adaptation (necessary condition of adaptation), energy circulation,
Introduction xvii
gears, and tolerances are discussed here. This discussion is followed by consideration of
design for powder metal, performance, and AM gears.
Novel accomplishments in the area of induction heat treatment of
gears and gear-like components are discussed in Chapter 10. This
section of the book is contributed by Dr. Valery Rudnev, an expert
in the field of heat treatment of gears and gear-like components.
The chapter begins with an introduction that follows with the
discussion of electromagnetic principles of induction heating. This
includes, but is not limited to, commonly accepted definitions in
skin effect, nonexponential distribution in skin effect, and eddy
current cancellation. Then metallurgical subtleties of induction
gear hardening are discussed. Material selection for induction gear
hardening, impact of rapid heating and steel prior microstructure,
super hardness phenomenon, along with specifics of induction
hardening of powder metallurgy (P/M) gears are covered in this chapter of the book.
Particular attention is paid to the technologies for induction gear hardening. This section
of the book begins with general remarks, and is followed by an overview of tooth hardness
patterns, and inductor designs and heating modes. Tooth-by-tooth hardening of gears, gear
spin hardening (encircling inductors), quenching options, along with the heating modes for
encircling inductors are covered when discussing this later topic. In the later sections of the
chapter, the residual stresses at tooth working surface, hardening components containing
teeth, as well as tempering of gears and gear-like components are discussed to the best
possible extent. The chapter ends with the conclusion section, acknowledgement section,
and references.
In Chapter 11, a brief overview on the evolution of gear art
is presented. Design and production of gears, as well as the
accomplishments in gear science are covered in this discussion. This
section of the book is contributed by Prof. Stephen P. Radzevich.
The chapter begins with brief notes on the history of methods
of machining gears and on the design of gear cutting tools. Early
accomplishments in the design of toothed wheels and in methods
for manufacture of gears, early designs of special purpose cutting
tools to produce gear teeth, gear-cutting tools for the first production
machines, and evolution of the gear-cutting tools for production
machines are covered in this discussion. This discussion follows
with a brief analysis of the development of the skiving internal
gears process, and rotary gear shaving process, grinding hardened gears, along with the
designs of gear-cutting tools for generating bevel gears. Later accomplishments in design
of gear-cutting tools for the generating bevel gears are also considered. This section of the
chapter ends with a brief discussion of the generating milling of bevel gears.
In the next section of the chapter, the evolution of the scientific theory of gearing is briefly
overviewed. The discussion is subdivided onto three periods of time that are labeled as
(a) the pre-Eulerian period of gear art, (b) the origin of the scientific theory of gearing:
the Eulerian period of gear art, and (c) the post-Eulerian period of the developments in
the field of gearing. The reader’s attention is focused here mainly on the developments
in the field of perfect gearings. These include but are not limited to G. Grant bevel gearing,
contributions by Prof. N. I. Kolchin, Prof. M. L. Novikov, and by Prof. V. A. Gavrilenko. Then
accomplishments in the investigation of the condition of conjugacy of the interacting tooth
flanks of a gear and a mating pinion in crossed-axes gearing, and the equality of angular
Introduction xix
base pitches of a gear and a mating pinion to operating angular base pitch in intersected-
axes, and in crossed-axes gearing are outlined. This section of the chapter ends with a
tentative chronology of the evolution of the theory of gearing, along with harmonic drive
contributed by Walton Musser.
In the third section of the chapter, the developments in the field of approximate gearings,
Cone double-enveloping worm gearing, approximate bevel gearing, approximate crossed-
axes gearing, and face gearing are discussed.
The chapter ends with a brief summary of the principal accomplishments in the theory of
gearing achieved by the beginning of the twenty-first century. These accomplishments form
a set of three fundamental laws of gearing all gearings must obey to. All the discussions
are summarized in the concluding remarks.
Appendix A, titled as “On the Inconsistency of the Term ‘Wildhaber-Novikov Gearing’:
A New Look at the Concept of ‘Novikov Gearing,’” is contributed by Prof. Stephen P.
Radzevich. An advanced interpretation of the concept of “Novikov Gearing” is outlined
in this appendix.
Contributed by Prof. Stephen P. Radzevich, Appendix B is titled “Applied Coordinate
Systems and Linear Transformations.” Novel accomplishments that pertain to the
coordinate system transformations are briefly outlined in this appendix.
It is likely this book is not free from omissions or mistakes; or that it is as clear and
ambiguous as it should be. If you have any constructive suggestions, please communicate
them to me via email: radzevich@usa.com.
Stephen P. Radzevich
Sterling Heights, MI
September 22, 2018
1
Fundamentals of Transmission of Rotary
Motion by Means of Perfect Gears
Stephen P. Radzevich
CONTENTS
1.1 Introductory Remarks............................................................................................................ 2
1.2 Three Fundamental Laws of Gearing..................................................................................4
1.2.1 Condition of Contact between Interacting Tooth Flanks: The First
Fundamental Law of Gearing................................................................................... 4
1.2.2 Condition of Conjugacy of Interacting Tooth Flanks: The Second
Fundamental Law of Gearing................................................................................... 8
1.2.2.1 Pulley-and-Belt: Analogy of a Gear Pair.................................................. 8
1.2.2.2 Camus-Euler-Savary Theorem................................................................. 10
1.2.2.3 Condition of Conjugacy of Interacting Tooth Flanks in Case of
Crossed-Axes Gearing............................................................................... 14
1.2.3 Equality of Base Pitches of Interacting Tooth Flanks of a Gear and a
Mating Pinion to Operating Base Pitch of the Gear Pair: The Third
Fundamental Law of Gearing................................................................................. 18
1.3 Illustrative Example: Perfect Crossed-Axes Gearing with Line Contact between
the Tooth Flanks of a Gear and a Mating Pinion............................................................. 20
1.3.1 Kinematics of Crossed-Axes Gearing.................................................................... 23
1.3.2 Base Cones in Perfect Crossed-Axes Gear Pairs................................................... 24
1.3.3 Tooth Flanks in Perfect Crossed-Axes Gears........................................................ 27
1.4 Conclusion............................................................................................................................. 32
References........................................................................................................................................ 32
Bibliography................................................................................................................................... 33
Three principal components are recognized in modern machinery. These are (a) a source
of power, and (b) a working member, that are connected to each other by means of (c)
a transmission. Transmitting and transforming an input motion is the main purpose of
the transmission. Gears and gear transmissions are extensively used in today’s industry
for transmitting and transforming an input motion.
Principal features of perfect gear pairs are briefly discussed in this section of the book.
A higher power, and a smaller size, is the main trend in the evolution of the power
sources for the application in modern machinery. Therefore, along with a smaller size, the
output rotation of the power sources (of an internal combustion engine, of an electric DC
motor, as well as of other sources of motion) gets higher. For example, the output rotation
of the electric DC motor spindle in the range of 30,000 to 40,000 rpm is common even in
trivial engineering applications. For an electric motor of a specified power, the following
1
2 Advances in Gear Design and Manufacture
correlation is observed: the smaller the size of the electric motor, the higher the rotation of
the motor spindle, and vice versa.
For many reasons, gear transmissions perfectly meet most of the requirements the
transmissions have to fulfill, especially in cases when a gear transmission is capable of
transmitting a uniform rotary motion with a highest attainable “power density.”1 Modern
gear transmissions have to be as small in size as possible and be capable of transmitting as
high amount of power as possible in order to meet these requirements.
FIGURE 1.1
Use of wooden gears in the design of a gear transmission.
1 “Power density” is understood here and below as a ratio of the amount of power being transmitted by means
of a gear transmission to weight of the transmission. “Power-to-weight ratio” is another term used for this
purpose.
2 The artefact was recovered between 1900 to 1901 from the Antikythera shipwreck off the Greek island of
Antikythera. Its significance and complexity were not understood until decades later. Believed to have been
designed and constructed by Greek scientists, the instrument has been dated either between 150 and 100 BCE,
or, according to a more recent view, at 205 BCE. This precious example of antique genius complexity grade was
so high that artefacts of a similar complexity and workmanship did not reappear for a millennium and a half,
when mechanical astronomical clocks were built in Europe.
Fundamentals of Transmission of Rotary Motion by Means of Perfect Gears 3
FIGURE 1.2
Areas of existence of parallel-axes gearings of different kinds.
transmissions featured a low power density. Actually, at that time, the power density of a
gear transmission was not of importance to the gear users.
Let’s consider only two critical parameters of a gear pair, namely, a torque (Trq) and a
rotation (RPM) on the driving shaft of a gear pair. Then, in a Cartesian coordinate system,
“Trq vs. RPM,” a point corresponds to an arbitrary gear pair. As an example, parallel-axes
gear pairs3 are plotted in the reference system, “Trq vs. RPM,” in Figure 1.2.
Two sets of parallel lines are plotted in Figure 1.2. The straight lines, RPM = RPMmin
and RPM = RPMmax, correspond to physically permissible minimal and maximal rotations
of the input shaft of a gear pair. Two other straight lines, Trq = Trqmin and Trq = Trqmax,
correspond to physically permissible minimal and maximal torques of the input shaft of
a gear pair. All the gear pairs can be mapped by a point that is located within the interior
of the rectangle bounded by the lines RPM = RPMmin, RPM = RPMmax, and Trq = Trqmin,
Trq = Trqmax, including the boundaries. No gearing is feasible if a gear pair is mapped by
a point that is located in the exterior of the rectangle bounded by the just mentioned lines.
The permissible area of existence of gear pairs can be narrowed based on the following
analysis.
A highest power, Pmax, that can be transmitted by a gear pair, equals
3 Similar diagrams can be constructed for intersected-axes gear pairs, as well as for crossed-axes gear pairs.
4 Advances in Gear Design and Manufacture
Transmission of a rotation from a driving shaft to a driven shaft is possible only by means
of gear pairs4 that are mapped inside the area shown in Figure 1.2.
Points that correspond to wooden gear pairs are plotted in Figure 1.2 by points that
are located close to the point of intersection of the straight lines, RPM = RPMmin and
Trq = Trqmin. The areas of preferable applications of gear pairs of different types are also
shown in Figure 1.2.
As it follows from the analysis of Figure 1.2, future developments in the field of gearing
have to be undertaken toward the gear systems that feature a highest permissible power
density, that is, of the gear pairs that are mapped in Figure 1.2 closer either to the straight
line RPM = RPMmax, or to the straight line Trq = Trqmax, or to the boundary hyperbola,
Pmax = RPM max · Trqmax (see Equation 1.1). Gearings of these kinds obey to all three
fundamental laws of gearing [6], and, thus, are referred to as “perfect gearings.”
1.2.1 C
ondition of Contact between Interacting Tooth Flanks:
The First Fundamental Law of Gearing
The condition of contact between the tooth flanks of a gear and a mating pinion is reflected
by the “first fundamental law of gearing” to be discussed below. The condition of contact
4 The schematic shown in Figure 1.2 is qualitative (not quantitative), and intuitive.
5 Noncircular gears with a variable angular-velocity ratio are not considered here.
Fundamentals of Transmission of Rotary Motion by Means of Perfect Gears 5
between the tooth flanks is the first fundamental condition to be met in gearings of all types
in parallel-axes gearing, in intersected-axes, as well as in crossed-axes gearing. Alignment
of the linear velocity vector, VΣ, of the resultant relative motion to the common tangent at
point of contact, K, of the interacting tooth flanks, G and P, of a gear and its mating pinion
(VΣ || t, where t is a unit vector through contact point, K; for example, entirely located in
the common tangent plane) is specified by the condition of contact.
The necessity of alignment of the resultant linear velocity vector, VΣ, to the common
tangent (or, the same, the necessity of perpendicularity, VΣ ⊥ ng, of the resultant velocity
vector, VΣ, to the common perpendicular, ng) is illustrated by the following example.
Consider a relative motion of the tooth flanks, G and P, of a gear and a mating pinion
as illustrated in Figure 1.3. For simplicity, but without loss of generality, normal sections
through contact point of the gear and the mating pinion are depicted there. It is also
assumed that the gear tooth flank, G, is motionless, and the pinion tooth flank, P, performs
an arbitrary instantaneous motion, VΣ, in relation to the gear tooth surface, G.
Three different scenarios can be distinguished when the pinion tooth flank, P, travels in
relation to the gear tooth flank, G.
First, an instantaneous motion of point, Ka, within the pinion tooth flank, P, is specified
by an instant linear velocity vector, VΣa (see Figure 1.3a). Point, A, within the pinion tooth
flank, P, is chosen so that the projection, Prn VΣa, of the linear velocity vector, VΣb, onto the unit
normal vector, n ap , to the moving surface, P, at point, Ka, is pointed toward the interior of the
motionless gear tooth flank, G, that is, the inequality, Prn VΣb > 0, is valid. In the differential
vicinity of point, Ka, this results that the moving pinion tooth flank, P , penetrates into the
motionless gear tooth flank, G. A relative motion of this kind is not permissible for the
conjugate tooth flanks, G and P, of a gear and a mating pinion.
Second, an instantaneous motion of point, Kb, within the pinion tooth flank, P, is specified
by an instant linear velocity vector, VΣb (see Figure 1.3b). Point, Kb, within the pinion tooth
flank, P, is chosen so that the linear velocity vector, VΣb, is perpendicular to the unit normal
vector, nbp , and, thus, it is tangent to the gear tooth flank, G, at contact point Kb. The projection,
Prn VΣb , of the linear velocity vector, VΣb, onto the unit normal vector, n ap , to the moving tooth
flank, P, at point, Kb, is equal to zero (i.e., an equality Prn VΣb = 0 is observed). In the differential
FIGURE 1.3
On the necessity of alignment of the linear velocity vector of resultant relative motion, VΣ, to the common tangent
to the contacting tooth flanks, G and P , (a) penetration of the tooth flanks, G and P, (b) proper contact tooth
flanks, G and P, (c) separation of the tooth flanks, G and P, is observed.
6 Advances in Gear Design and Manufacture
vicinity of point, Kb, this results that the moving pinion tooth flank, P, does not penetrate
the motionless gear tooth flank, G. Instead, the pinion tooth flank, P, rolls and slides in
relation to the gear tooth flank, G. In a particular case, either the rolling component, or the
sliding component of the resultant relative motion of this kind can be zero. Relative motion
of this particular kind is permissible for the conjugate tooth flanks, G and P. Transmitting
a motion from a driving shaft to a driven shaft is possible if, and only if, a relative motion of
this particular kind is occurred.
Third, an instantaneous motion of point, Kc, within the pinion tooth flank, P, is specified
by an instantaneous linear velocity vector, VΣc (see Figure 1.3c). Point, Kc, within the pinion
tooth flank, P, is chosen so that the projection, Prn VΣc , of the linear velocity vector, VΣc , onto
the unit normal vector, ncp , to the moving pinion tooth flank, P, at Kc is pointed outward
to the motionless gear tooth flank, G (i.e., the inequality Prn VΣc < 0 is valid). Therefore, in
the differential vicinity of point, Kc, the moving pinion tooth flank, P, departs from the
motionless gear tooth flank, G. No motion transmission is possible when a relative motion
of this kind is occurred.
The schematic depicted in Figure 1.3 shows the necessity of the proper alignment of the
vector of the linear velocity, VΣ, of the resultant relative motion of the tooth flanks, G and
P, to the common tangent to the tooth flanks, G and P, at every point of their contact. This
condition is referred to as the “first fundamental law of gearing.” The first fundamental
law of gearing is formulated as follows: “At every point of contact of tooth flanks of a gear
and a mating pinion, a vector of their instant relative motion has to be perpendicular to the
common perpendicular at every instant of time.”
Various forms of analytical representation of the condition of contact of the tooth flanks,
G and P, of a gear and its mating pinion are known.
To derive a convenient analytical representation for the condition of contact of the tooth
flanks, G and P, of a gear and a pinion, let’s turn our attention to the following. As shown
in Figure 1.3, the dot product of vectors ng and VΣ
• Is of a positive value (n ap ⋅ VΣa > 0) in the first case (see Figure 1.3a)
• Equals zero (n ap ⋅ VΣa = 0) in the second case (see Figure 1.3b)
• Is of a negative value (n ap ⋅ VΣa < 0) in the first case (see Figure 1.3c)
The condition of contact between a gear tooth flank, G, and a mating pinion tooth
flank, P, is violated in a misaligned parallel-axes gear pair as schematically illustrated
in Figure 1.4. Edge contact between the tooth flanks, G and P, is observed in the case
under consideration. Therefore, no common perpendicular is observed, and the condition
of contact of the tooth flanks, G and P, is violated.
FIGURE 1.4
Example of violation of the condition of contact between a gear tooth flank, G, and a mating pinion tooth
flank, P, in misaligned parallel-axes gear pair.
Fundamentals of Transmission of Rotary Motion by Means of Perfect Gears 7
The condition of contact of two conjugate tooth flanks of mating gear teeth can be
expressed in the form of dot product, written as [10]
n g ⋅ VΣ = 0 (1.2)
where ng is the unit vector of common perpendicular through the contact point of the
tooth flanks, G and P, of a gear and its mating pinion, and VΣ is the linear velocity
vector the resultant instantaneous relative motion of the tooth flanks, G and P, at contact
point K.
Equation 1.2 reveals that a component of the linear velocity vector, VΣ, along the common
perpendicular, ng, is equal to zero. Otherwise, either separation, or penetration of the tooth
flanks, G and P, in the gear pair occurs. Neither separation, nor interference of the tooth
flanks, G and P, of a gear and a mating pinion is permissible. Therefore, the linear velocity
vector, VΣ, is either located in a common tangent plane or it is of a zero value.
Equation 1.2 was proposed by Prof. V. A. Shishkov as early as 1948 (or even earlier [4,14]).
As Prof. V. A. Shishkov is the first to propose to express the condition of contact in the form
of dot product (see Equation 1.2), this equation is commonly referred to as the “Shishkov
equation of contact, ng·VΣ = 0.” The interested reader may wish to discover why Prof.
V.A. Shishkov is credited for the discovery of the equation of contact of two tooth flanks in
the form ng·VΣ = 0 (see [6] for further reading).
Equation of contact in the form ng·VΣ = 0 is practical in cases when the interacting
surfaces feature simple geometry, and when the resultant relative motion is also of a
simple nature. The first makes it possible to determine the unit normal vector, ng, without
the derivation of the expressions for the derivatives of the equations of the contacting
surface with respect to the surface parameters. The second allows the determination of
the linear velocity vector, VΣ, without derivation of the equation of the moving surface
with respect to the parameter of motion. Use of the “Shishkov equation of contact” in
the form ng·VΣ = 0 simplifies the solution to the problem in this particular case. In cases
when derivation of the equations of the derivatives for the purposes of determination of
the vectors, ng and VΣ, cannot be avoided, use of the “Shishkov equation of contact” in
the form ng·VΣ = 0 is less efficient.
The above discussion can be summarized as follows. Permissible instant relative motions
of the tooth flanks, G and P, in a gear pair are illustrated in Figure 1.3. No relative motion
of the tooth flanks, G and P, is permissible along the common perpendicular, ng, and the
relative motion is allowed in any direction within the common tangent plane through
contact point, K. It should be pointed out here that a swivel relative motion of the tooth
flanks, G and P, around the axis along the common perpendicular, ng, through an
angle, ±ϕn, (Figure 1.5), also meets the requirement specified by Equation 1.2. The swivel
motion, ±ϕn, of the tooth flanks is not necessary to transmit a rotation from a driving shaft
to a driven shaft. However, motion of this nature can be observed in spatial gearing, that
is, in Ca–gearing.
It is necessary to stress the reader’s attention here on the following. Equation of contact
in the form ng·VΣ = 0, was proposed by Prof. V. A. Shishkov in the mid-twentieth century
(see Equation 1.2). However, the physics of the condition of contact (but not the equation of
contact itself) was properly realized by gear people in the time of Leonardo da Vinci [7],
and earlier.
The condition of contact of a gear and a mating pinion tooth flanks, G and P, is referred
to as the “first fundamental law of gearing.” All perfect gearings have to fulfill this law of
gearing.
8 Advances in Gear Design and Manufacture
FIGURE 1.5
Permissible instant relative motions in “perfect gearing”.
Fulfillment of the condition of contact of a gear and mating pinion tooth flanks, G and
P, is a necessary but not sufficient condition to transmit a uniform rotation smoothly from
a driving shaft to a driven shaft by means of a gear pair.
1.2.2 C
ondition of Conjugacy of Interacting Tooth Flanks:
The Second Fundamental Law of Gearing
The condition of conjugacy of tooth flanks of a gear and a mating pinion is the second
fundamental condition to be fulfilled in perfect gearings of all kinds. Conjugacy is a specific
property of a gear and mating pinion tooth flanks (tooth profiles) that roll over one another.
This property pertains only to surfaces and curves that roll over one another.
The condition of conjugacy of a gear and mating pinion tooth flanks is referred to as the
“second fundamental law of gearing.” Below, the discussion on the second fundamental
law of gearing begins with perfect parallel-axes gearing. Then, this discussion is evolved
to the most general case of crossed-axes gearing.
Fig. 230.—Characteristic
Jamaican and Haitian
Mollusca: A, Sagdae
pistylium Müll., Jamaica; B,
Chondropoma salleanum Pfr.,
San Domingo; C,
Eutrochatella Tankervillei
Gray, Jamaica; D, Cylindrella
agnesiana C. B. Ad.,
Jamaica.
The land operculates form the bulk of the land fauna, there being
actually 242 species, as against 221 of land Pulmonata, a proportion
never again approached in any part of the world. As many as 80 of
these belong to the curious little genus Stoastoma, which is all but
peculiar to the island, one species having been found in San
Domingo, and one in Porto Rico. Geomelania and Chittya, two
singular inland forms akin to Truncatella, are quite peculiar. Alcadia
reaches its maximum of 14 species, as against 4 species in San
Domingo and 9 species in Cuba, and Lucidella is common to San
Domingo only; but, if Stoastoma be omitted, the Helicinidae
generally are not represented by so many or by so striking forms as
in Cuba, which has 90 species, as against Jamaica 44, and San
Domingo 35.
(c) San Domingo, although not characterised by the extraordinary
richness of Cuba and Jamaica, possesses many specially
remarkable forms of land Mollusca, to which a thorough exploration,
when circumstances permit, will no doubt make important additions.
From its geographical position, impinging as it does on all the islands
of the Greater Antilles, it would be expected that the fauna of San
Domingo would not exhibit equal signs of isolation, but would appear
to be influenced by them severally. This is exactly what occurs, and
San Domingo is consequently, although very rich in peculiar species,
not equally so in peculiar genera. The south-west district shows
distinct relations with Jamaica, the Jamaican genera Leia,
Stoastoma, Lucidella, and the Thaumasia section of Cylindrella
occurring here only. The north and north-west districts are related to
Cuba, while the central district, consisting of the long band of
mountainous country which traverses the island, contains the more
characteristic Haitian forms.
The Helicidae are the most noteworthy of the San Domingo land
Mollusca. The group Eurycratera, which contains some of the finest
existing land snails, is quite peculiar, while Parthena, Cepolis,
Plagioptycha, and Caracolus here reach their maximum. The
Cylindrellidae are very abundant, but no section is peculiar. Land
operculates do not bear quite the same proportion to the Pulmonata
as in Cuba and Jamaica, but they are well represented (100 to 152);
Rolleia is the only peculiar genus.
The relations of San Domingo to the neighbouring islands are
considerably obscured by the fact that they are well known, while
San Domingo is comparatively little explored. To this may perhaps
be due the curious fact that there are actually more species common
to Cuba and Porto Rico (26) than to Porto Rico and San Domingo.
Cuba shares with San Domingo its small-sized Caracolus and also
Liguus, but the great Eurycratera, Parthena, and Plagioptycha are
wholly wanting in Cuba. The land operculates are partly related to
Cuba, partly to Jamaica, thus Choanopoma, Ctenopoma, Cistula,
Tudora, and many others, are represented on all these islands, while
the Jamaican Stoastoma occurs on San Domingo and Porto Rico,
but not on Cuba, and Lucidella is common to San Domingo and
Jamaica alone. An especial link between Jamaica and San Domingo
is the occurrence in the south-west district of the latter island of
Sagda (2 sp.). The relative numbers of the genera Strophia,
Macroceramus, and Helicina, as given below (p. 351), are of interest
in this connexion.
Porto Rico, with Vièque, is practically a fragment of San Domingo.
The points of close relationship are the occurrence of Caracolus,
Cepolis, and Parthena among the Helicidae, and of Simpulopsis,
Pseudobalea, and Stoastoma. Cylindrella and Macroceramus are
but poorly represented, but Strophia still occurs. The land
operculates (see the Table) show equal signs of removal from the
headquarters of development. Megalomastoma, however, has some
striking forms. The appearance of a single Clausilia, whose nearest
relations are in the northern Andes, is very remarkable. Gaeotis,
which is allied to Peltella (Ecuador only), is peculiar.
Fig. 231.—Examples of West Indian
Helices: A, Helix (Parthena)
angulata Fér., Porto Rico; B,
Helix (Thelidomus) lima Fér.,
Vièque; C, Helix (Dentellaria) nux
denticulata Chem., Martinique.
Land Mollusca of the Greater Antilles
Cuba. Jamaica. S. Domingo. Porto Rico.
Glandina 18 24 15 8
Streptostyla 4 ... 2 ...
Volutaxis ... 11 (?) 1 ...
Selenites 1 ... ... ...
Hyalinia 4 11 5 6
Patula 5 1 ... ...
Sagda ... 13 2 ...
Microphysa 7 18 8 3
Cysticopsis 9 6 ... ...
Hygromia (?) ... ... 3 ...
Leptaxis (?) ... ... 1 ...
Polygyra 2 ... ... ...
Jeanerettia 6 ... ... 1
Euclasta ... ... ... 4
Plagioptycha ... ... 14 2
Strobila ... 1 ... ...
Dialeuca ... 1 ... ...
Leptoloma 1 8 ... ...
Eurycampta 4 ... ... ...
Coryda 7 ... ... ...
Thelidomus 15 3 ... 3
Eurycratera ... ... 7 ...
Parthena ... ... 2 2
Cepolis ... ... 3 1
Caracolus 8 ... 6 2
Polydontes 3 ... ... 1
Hemitrochus 12 1 ... ...
Polymita 5 ... ... ...
Pleurodonta ... 34 ... ...
Inc. sed. 5 ... ... ...
Simpulopsis ... ... 1 1
Bulimulus 3 3 6 7
Orthalicus 1 1 ... ...
Liguus 3 ... 1 ...
Gaeotis ... ... ... 3
Pineria 2 ... ... 1
Macroceramus 34 2 14 3
Leia ... 14 2 ...
Cylindrella 130 36 35 3
Pseudobalea 2 ... 1 1
Stenogyra 6 7 (?) ...
Opeas 8 (?) 4 6
Subulima 6 14 2 2
Glandinella 1 ... ... ...
Spiraxis 2 (?) 2 1
Melaniella 7 ... ... ...
Geostilbia 1 ... 1 ...
Cionella 2 ... ... ...
Leptinaria ... 1 ... 3
Obeliscus ... ... 1 2
Pupa 2 7 3 2
Vertigo 4 ... ... ...
Strophia 19 ... 3 2
Clausilia ... ... ... 1
Succinea 11 2 5 3
Vaginula 2 2 2 1
Megalomastoma 13 ... 1 3
Neocyclotus 1 33(?) ... ...
Licina 1 ... 3 ...
Jamaicia ... 2 ... ...
Crocidopoma ... 1 3 ...
Rolleia ... ... 1 ...
Choanopoma 25 12 19 3
Ctenopoma 30 2 1 ...
Cistula 15 3 3 3
Chondropoma 57 (?) 19 4
Tudora 7 17 5 ...
Adamsiella 1 12 ... ...
Blaesospira 1 ... ... ...
Xenopoma 1 ... ... ...
Cistula 15 3 3 ...
Colobostylus 4 13 5 ...
Diplopoma 1 ... ... ...
Geomelania ... 21 ... ...
Chittya ... 1 ... ...
Blandiella ... ... 1 ...
Stoastoma ... 80 1 1
Eutrochatella 21 6 6 ...
Lucidella ... 4 1 ...
Alcadia 9 14 4 ...
Helicina 58 16 24 9
Proserpina 2 4 ... ...
The Virgin Is., with St. Croix, Anguilla, and the St. Bartholomew
group (all of which are non-volcanic islands), are related to Porto
Rico, while Guadeloupe and all the islands to the south, up to
Grenada (all of which are volcanic), show marked traces of S.
American influence. St. Kitt’s, Antigua, and Montserrat may be
regarded as intermediate between the two groups. St. Thomas, St.
John, and Tortola have each one Plagioptycha and one Thelidomus,
while St. Croix has two sub-fossil Caracolus which are now living in
Porto Rico, together with one Plagioptycha and one Thelidomus
(sub-fossil). The gradual disappearance of some of the characteristic
greater Antillean forms, and the appearance of S. American forms in
the Lesser Antilles, is shown by the following table:—
S
P S S G M t
o t S t u a S .
r . t A . a D r t B T
t S . T n A d o t . a V G r
o T t o g K n e m i r i r i
h . C r u i t l i n L b n e n
R o r t i t i o n i u a c n i
i m J o o l t g u i q c d e a d
c a a i l l ’ u p c u i o n d a
o s n x a a s a e a e a s t a d
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bulimulus 7 4 2 4 1 2 2 3 8 9 5 3 3 6 2 4
Cylindrella 3 2 1 1 1 . . . . 1 1 1 1 . . 1
Macroceramus 3 1 1 . 2 1 . . . . . . . . . .
Cyclostomatidae, etc.23 4 1 5 1 1 1 . 4 . . . . . . 1
Dentellaria . . . . . . 1 1 8 5 11 2 2 . 1 1
Cyclophorus . . . . . . . . 1 2 2 . . . . .
Amphibulimus . . . . . . . . 2 3 1 . . . . .
Homalonyx . . . . . . . . 1 1 . . . . . .