Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Analysis Probability Applications and Computation Proceedings of The 11Th Isaac Congress Vaxjo Sweden 2017 Karl Olof Lindahl Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Analysis Probability Applications and Computation Proceedings of The 11Th Isaac Congress Vaxjo Sweden 2017 Karl Olof Lindahl Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematical-analysis-and-
applications-plenary-lectures-isaac-2017-vaxjo-sweden-luigi-g-
rodino/
https://textbookfull.com/product/language-and-automata-theory-
and-applications-11th-international-conference-lata-2017-umea-
sweden-march-6-9-2017-proceedings-1st-edition-frank-drewes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transportation-research-
proceedings-of-ctrg-2017-tom-v-mathew/
https://textbookfull.com/product/proceedings-of-the-11th-
international-congress-for-applied-mineralogy-icam-1st-edition-
faqin-dong-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/control-of-magnetotransport-in-
quantum-billiards-theory-computation-and-applications-1st-
edition-christian-v-morfonios/
Trends in Mathematics
Research Perspectives
Analysis, Probability,
Applications, and
Computation
Proceedings of the 11th ISAAC
Congress, Växjö (Sweden) 2017
Trends in Mathematics
Research Perspectives
Research Perspectives collects core ideas and developments discussed at con-
ferences and workshops in mathematics, as well as their increasingly important
applications to other fields. This subseries’ rapid publication of extended abstracts,
open problems and results of discussions ensures that readers are at the forefront of
current research developments.
Analysis, Probability,
Applications, and
Computation
Proceedings of the 11th ISAAC Congress,
Växjö (Sweden) 2017
Editors
Karl-Olof Lindahl Torsten Lindström
Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics
Linnaeus University Linnaeus University
Växjö, Sweden Växjö, Sweden
Patrik Wahlberg
Department of Mathematics
Linnaeus University
Växjö, Sweden
This book is published under the imprint Birkhäuser, www.birkhauser-science.com by the registered
company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
The 11th International ISAAC Congress was held on 14–18 August 2017 at Linnæus
University, Växjö, Sweden. The congress continued the successful series of biennial
meetings previously held in the USA (1997), Japan (1999), Germany (2001),
Canada (2003), Italy (2005), Turkey (2007), the UK (2009), Russia (2011), Poland
(2013) and P. R. China (2015). The total number of participants of the congress
was 304 coming from 43 countries, including the special guests and the organizing
committee from Växjö. There were 12 plenary speakers. Totally, the congress had 17
sessions spanning 5 working days. One afternoon was assigned to excursions. The
congress was sponsored by academic institutions, local municipality and the host
university. One of the features of the congress was the invitation of applied subjects
like electrical engineering and mathematics in biology. The 11th International
ISAAC Congress was an important scientific event during which mathematicians
from different parts of the world had an opportunity to present new results and
ideas. It was also a great possibility for young mathematicians to contact experts in
a variety of fields.
The atmosphere during the congress was warm and friendly. The social events
included a banquet at Glass country (Glasriket) and excursions with a steam boat to
the largest lake near Växjö.
It is a well-established tradition within the community to award one or several
outstanding young researchers during the ISAAC Congress. The ISAAC award of
the 11th International ISAAC Congress was presented to
Tuomas Hytönen (University of Helsinki, Finland)
for his strong contributions to harmonic analysis, geometric analysis, functional
analysis and singular integral operators. Though he is a young scientist, he has
already achieved several results of high quality, published in top journals. One of
his major achievements is the proof of the A2 conjecture for Calderón–Zygmund
operators, published in Annals of Mathematics 2012. He was also an invited speaker
at ICM 2014.
At the ISAAC board meeting during the congress, several decisions of funda-
mental importance for the organization were taken:
v
vi Preface
ix
x Contents
The session was primarily aimed for talks that are using dynamical systems
theory in order to analyze various models that arise in biological applications. The
models analyzed may be mechanistically formulated, fitted to data, deterministic, or
stochastic. Various relations between such models that arise in different modeling
approaches and under different simplifying assumptions can be analyzed. Possible
biological applications can include ecology, epidemiology, pharmacokinetics, evo-
lution, physiology, pattern formation, and resource distribution, but are not limited
to these topics. A part of the session was reserved for stakeholders with rich contact
networks outside academia.
Analysis of State-Control Optimality
System for Invasive Species Management
1 Introduction
At least 12 billion of euros per year are spent by the countries of the European
Union for the management of invasive species [11]. This figure includes costs
for key economic sectors, such as agriculture, fisheries, aquaculture, forestry, and
health sectors as well as damages and management costs. Moreover, invasive
species are commonly deemed as responsible of global biodiversity loss [15]. The
human element affects invasive species in many different ways: by inadvertently
introducing alien species in ecosystems or when they disrupt a territory with the
result of a possible response growth in invasive species. Recently, some aspects of
the problem have become controversial: both the identification of invasive species
with no-native ones and the negative impact on the hosting habitat are currently
debated in the scientific community [9]. There are cases of native species which
become invasive due to environmental changes, either due to anthropic pressures or
to climate changes, and cases of alien species used to restore a somehow perturbed
ecosystem equilibrium of the hosting environment [14], like feral cats, an alien
species which has been introduced in Australia for keeping in control other invasive
species (rodents) [12]. Despite the changing perspective of the role of invasive
species, in protected areas with severe conservation issues, the total eradication
is still an objective to be perceived. We are not entering here the debate on the
soundness of the approach to invasive species from an ecological point of view,
since it is out of the purpose of the present chapter. We will focus instead on the
mathematical tools that may provide a solution to the management issue of the
containment of those species which halter the ecosystem and the ecosystem services
of a protected area because of their fast spread, regardless of their origin. Many
studies [3, 6–8, 16] have indicated that, despite their high costs, intensive control
strategies can be optimal since they are capable of minimizing the infestation area,
halting future spread and associated damages.
In [13], an in-depth overview about the link between the optimal control theory
and biology can be found. Therein, a discrete time model has been described as an
example of optimal control approach to the management of invasive plant species.
In this chapter, we follow the continuous dynamical approach contained in many
papers by C. Baker and his coauthors on the specific topic of management of inva-
sive species [1–5]. More specifically, we suppose that the dynamics of the invasive
species population is described by the following ordinary differential equation:
u(t)
u̇(t) = r u(t) 1− − u (μ E(t))q , (1)
k
where δ ∈ (0, 1) represents the discount factor. We define the set of positive
bounded Lebesgue integrable control functions as:
U = E ∈ L1 (0, T ) : 0 ≤ E ≤ b ,
with b > 0 a fixed constant. We also fix the constant T̄ and seek for an optimal
control pair (E ∗ , T ∗ ) ∈ U × [0, T̄ ] such that
The invasive species dynamics governed by the model (1) and a nondiscounted
version of the objective functional (2) have been introduced in [3], for the manage-
ment of feral cats in Australia semiarid ecosystems. In [4], a theoretical analysis has
been performed for the nondiscounted model in [3], by means of a dynamical system
approach. Moreover, in that paper the authors provide the theoretical expression for
the optimal control values as well as for the optimal abatement program length when
the objective function does not depend explicitly on time. Here, we make a further
step by introducing a discount factor for the abatement cost. This introduction has
the effect of destroying the autonomous nature of the (Hamiltonian) optimality
system describing first-order necessary equations. As a consequence, the tool of
phase-plane analysis cannot be used to achieve theoretical results for the optimal
solution. In this chapter, following the approach in [4], we deduce the alternative
optimality system that describes the invasive density evolution in conjunction with
the control effort. The state-control system results to be autonomous and can be
analyzed by means of phase-space analysis. In so doing, we are able to provide
some qualitative characterizations of the solution of the discounted optimal control
problem (1)–(2).
The chapter is structured as follows: In Sect. 2, we apply the Pontryagin’s
Maximum Principle to set the necessary conditions for the optimal solution and
we introduce the time as additional variable to build a new conserved quantity
on the Hamiltonian of the original nonautonomous system. Then, in Sect. 3 we
move from a state–costate representation to a state-control one and analyze the
dynamics of resulting autonomous system. From the phase diagram generated with
the parameters of the feral cats example and the properties of the invariant, we derive
useful insights into the optimal solution in Sect. 4. Finally, in Sect. 5 we draw our
conclusions.
To characterize the optimal solution, the following necessary conditions are standard
results from Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle as stated in [17].
6 A. Martiradonna et al.
Then, there exists a piecewise differentiable adjoint variable λ(t) such that
for all the admissible controls E at each time t, where the Hamiltonian H is
u
H (t, u, E, λ) = e−δt E + r λ u 1 − − λ u μq E q (5)
k
and
2 u∗
λ̇ = −r λ 1 − + λ μq E ∗ q . (6)
k
Furthermore,
H (T ∗ , u∗ (T ∗ ), E ∗ (T ∗ ), λ(T ∗ )) = 0. (7)
∂ 2H
t, u∗ (t), E ∗ (t), λ(t) = (1 − q) q μq λ(t) u∗ (t) > 0.
∂E 2
Therefore, whenever the existence of the optimal solution is guaranteed, necessary
conditions stated in Theorem 1 can be applied to solve the optimal control (2)
subject to (3) with constraints (4). Let the triplet (u(t), λ(t), E(t)), with E(t) > 0,
solve the equation:
∂H
(t, u(t), E(t), λ(t)) = e−δt − λ(t) u(t) μq q E(t)q−1 = 0, (8)
∂E
Analysis of State-Control Optimality System for Invasive Species Management 7
We search for those u(t) and λ(t) which satisfy the following state–costate problem:
u ∗ q
u̇ = r u 1 − − u μq Eu,λ , (9)
k
2u ∗ q
λ̇ = − λ r 1 − + λ μq Eu,λ , (10)
k
min{ϕ(t, u(t), λ(t)), b}. Notice that, since ϕ(t, u(t), λ(t)) depends explicitly on
t, the previous system is not autonomous and a phase-space analysis cannot be
performed.
The system (9)–(10) is a time-dependent Hamiltonian system which does not
preserve the Hamiltonian function:
q − 1 1−q
δq
t 1 u
H (t, u, ϕ(t, u, λ), λ) = e q μq λ u 1−q + r λu 1 − . (11)
q k
is well defined for all E(t) ≥ 0. Moreover, by totally differentiating the condition
(13) with respect to time, we get
q (1 − q) μq λ u E q−2 Ė = − δ e−δ t + q μq λ E q−1 u̇ + q μq u E q−1 λ̇.
(14)
8 A. Martiradonna et al.
Then, accounting for Eqs. (3)–(6) and plugging (13) into (17) we obtain the
following set of differential equations:
u
u̇ = r u 1 − − u μq E ∗ q ,
k
r u + δk
Ė = E.
k (1 − q)
∂H
To localize the optimal solution, we observe that for all t such that (t, u(t), b,
∗
∂E
λ(t)) is strictly negative, then E (t) = b. By using (13), let us evaluate
∂H
(t, u(t), b, λ(t)) = e−δt (1 − E 1−q (t) bq−1 ). (15)
∂E
∂H
It is easy to see that for all t such that (t, u(t), b, λ(t)) < 0 it results E(t) >
∂E
b. Hence, we will refer to the following system as to the state-control optimality
system:
u
u̇ = r u 1 − − u μq min(E q , b q ),
k
(16)
r u + δk
Ė = E. (17)
k (1 − q)
Differently from the state–costate system, the state-control system is autonomous
and can be analyzed by means of the phase-space analysis for 0 ≤ u ≤ k and E ≥ 0.
As the bound of the effort is here introduced only to guarantee the existence of an
optimal solution, we limit our dynamical considerations to trajectories for which the
constraint E(t) < b is always verified. We hence focus on the following model:
u
u̇ = r u 1 − − u μq E q , (18)
k
r u + δk
Ė = E. (19)
k (1 − q)
We start the analysis of the state-control system (18)–(19) by observing that the first
quadrant is an invariant set for the dynamics since system trajectories never cross
the u and E axis. By looking at the zero-growth isoclines, we observe that u̇ = 0 on
the axis u = 0 and along the curve:
r 1/q u q1
E(u) = 1− . (20)
μ k
Analysis of State-Control Optimality System for Invasive Species Management 9
On the other hand, in the first quadrant, the equation Ė = 0 defines the zero-
growth isoclines E = 0. Consequently, the system admits as equilibria the points
Pk = (k, 0) and P0 = (0, 0). The Jacobian matrix of the state-control model
(18)–(19):
⎡ ⎤
2u
⎢ r 1 − k − μ E −u μ q E
q q q q−1
⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢
J (u, E) = ⎢ ⎥, (21)
⎥
⎣ r r u + δk ⎦
E
k (1 − q) k (1 − q)
δ
evaluated at P0 has eigenvalues r and both positive, this implying that the
1−q
origin is a repulsive node. The eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix (21) evaluated
r +δ
at the equilibrium Pk are −r < 0 and > 0, and hence Pk turns out to
1−q
be a saddle.
The loci u̇ = 0, defined by (20), intersect the E axis at the point
r 1/q
P1 = 0, and the u axis at the saddle point Pk = (k, 0). For value of u
μ
below the carrying capacity k, it results that isocline E = E(u) defined in (20) lies
in the first quadrant. Consequently, it partitions the (u, E) positive plane into two
regions, labeled I and II, lying below or above the curve, respectively. In Region I,
the trajectories are featured by values of u̇ > 0, while in Region II it results u̇ < 0.
Moreover, from (17), it can be checked that Ė > 0 for positive values of E. As
consequence in Region I, the solution trajectories are increasing in both u and E
direction. After crossing the curve u̇ = 0, they enter into Region II, decrease in the
u direction, and finally approach the increasing exponential dynamics on the E axis,
δ
described by Ė = E.
1−q
The above phase-plane analysis is a useful tool to provide some qualitative
characterizations of the optimal solution, as we show in the following section. In
Fig. 1, for illustrative purpose, we draw the phase diagram in correspondence to
parameters related to the case study of feral cats analyzed in [3], i.e., r = 0.55,
k = 100, μ = 2.21, and q = 0.64; moreover, we set δ = 0.005.
In order to detect the optimal solution, we notice that the function H , written in
terms of the state-control variables:
t
e−δ t r u 1−q
H (t, u, E) = (q − 1) E + q 1 − E +δ e−δ s E(s) ds,
q μ k 0
(22)
10 A. Martiradonna et al.
Region II
r1/q
µ u̇ = 0
Region I Pk
P0 k
u
Fig. 1 System trajectories in the (u, E) plane for a variety of initial conditions in the interior of
the first quadrant. Parameters: r = 0.55, k = 100, μ = 2.21, q = 0.64, and δ = 0.005
is an invariant for the state-control dynamics. The final optimal control value
E ∗ (T ∗ ) is uniquely determined by the necessary condition (7):
uT ∗ ∗ 1−q
∗
e−δ T r
(q − 1) E ∗ (T ∗ ) + q 1− E (T ) = 0.
q μ k
It follows that E ∗ (T ∗ ) = 0 or
1
∗ ∗ 1 r q uT q1
E (T ) = 1− . (23)
μ 1−q k
As in [4], we call curve of minimal effort the curve in the plane (u, E):
1
1 r q u q1
E(u) = 1− . (24)
μ 1−q k
With the above notations, Eq. (23) ensures that the final optimal control value
E ∗ (T ∗ ) lies on the curve of minimal effort. Moreover, by imposing
H (T ∗ , uT , E ∗ (T ∗ )) = H (0, u0 , E0∗ )
we have
T∗ 1 r u0 ∗ 1−q
δ e−δ s E ∗ (s) ds = (q − 1) E0∗ + 1− E0 (25)
0 q μq k
From the above relation, we have several insights about the optimal solution. Firstly,
observe that if δ = 0, then E0∗ lies on the curve of minimal effort defined in (24).
Analysis of State-Control Optimality System for Invasive Species Management 11
For δ > 0 (apart from the trivial case when uT = u0 , corresponding to T ∗ = 0), the
integral term is strictly positive, and hence E0∗ should lie below the curve of minimal
effort (25).
The left-hand term represents the objective function to be minimized, up to the
positive multiplicative constant δ > 0. By dividing both terms in (25) by δ, we
obtain an equivalent relation that can be written as follows:
1 r u0
J (E ∗ , T ∗ ) = q E0∗ − E0∗ 1−q E0∗ q − q 1− . (26)
δq μ k
By using both (26) and the qualitative behavior of the dynamics resulting from
the phase-space analysis in Sect. 3, we are able to characterize and localize the
optimal control solution. To this aim, let us consider the values spanned by the
following parametrization:
r 1/q u0 1/q
E () = 1− 0 ≤ ≤ q. (27)
μ (1 − )1/q k
Taking into account that the final optimal control value E ∗ (T ∗ ) must lie on the
curve of minimal effort, we detect the optimal trajectories starting form (u0 , E0∗ )
with E0∗ = E (), as follows:
• If E0∗ = E (q), then E0∗ lies on the curve of minimal effort (24). In this case,
relation (25) is satisfied with T ∗ = 0 and the optimal control E ∗ = E0∗
corresponds to the largest density target value u∗ (T ∗ ) = u0 . The objective
function assumes the minimum value Jq = J (E (q), 0) = 0, as can be
deduced from (26);
• If E0∗ = E (0), then E0∗ lies on the isocline defined in (20). From (26), the
E (0)
objective value is J0 = . The trajectory is optimal for the density target
δ
∗ ∗
value u (T ) = uT , where umin
min is the intersection between the trajectory
T
starting from (u0 , E (0)) and the curve of minimal effort (24);
• If E0∗ = E (), with 0 < < q, then E0 lies between the curve of minimal effort
(24) and the isocline defined in (20). The trajectory is optimal for a target value
uT s.t. umin
T < uT < u0 and the objective value is
1 r u0
J = (q − 1) E () + q 1 − E ()1−q
δq μ k
1 q −1 r u0 E (0)1−q
= E (0) + q 1 −
δ q(1 − )1/q μ k q(1 − )(1−q)/q
E (0) q −1 r u0 E (0)−q
= + q 1−
δ q(1 − )1/q μ k q(1 − )(1−q)/q
E (0) q −1 1 (q − )
= + = J0 .
δ q(1 − )1/q q(1 − )(1−q)/q q(1 − )1/q
12 A. Martiradonna et al.
E∗ (T∗ )
E
r1/q
µ
u̇ = 0 curve of
E∗0 minimal effort
Pk
P0 u min u =10 u0=80 k
T T u
Fig. 2 System trajectories in the (u, E) plane starting from u0 = 80 and reaching uT = 10 (dotted
black lines). Parameters: r = 0.55, k = 100, μ = 2.21, q = 0.64, and δ = 0.005. The optimal
solution (red continuous line) is achieved in correspondence to T ∗ ≈ 3.972, E ∗ (T ∗ ) ≈ 0.7442, and
E0∗ ≈ 0.0495. The dash-dotted black curve represents the optimal solution reaching the threshold
value of the final density umin
T ≈ 1.856
(q − )
Denoting with s() = , we have that s(0) = 1, s(q) = 0, and ṡ() <
q(1 − )1/q
0, hence we deduce that Jq < J < J0 .
In conclusion, if umin
T ≤ uT ≤ u0 , the initial point of the optimal solution will
belong to the interval [E (0), E (q)]. As a consequence, the optimal trajectory will
lie between the trajectory starting from (u0 , E (0)) and the curve of minimal effort.
In Fig. 2, for illustrative purposes, the resulting optimal trajectory for u0 = 80 and
uT = 10 is shown.
5 Conclusions
We considered an optimal control problem with free terminal time for the manage-
ment of invasive species. With respect to recent literature, we made the model more
realistic by introducing a discount term in the objective function. We showed that
the alternative state-control optimality system, defined as in [4], is autonomous and
can be analyzed with a dynamical system approach. We deduced the expression of
its invariant that suggested several insights on the optimal solution. Further work
will be devoted to theoretically establishing ranges of parameters that guarantee
existence and uniqueness results for the optimal control solution.
Analysis of State-Control Optimality System for Invasive Species Management 13
References
1. C.M. Baker, Target the source: optimal spatiotemporal resource allocation for invasive species
control. Conserv. Lett. 101, 41–48 (2016)
2. C.M. Baker, M. Bode, Spatial control of invasive species in conservation landscapes. Comput.
Manag. Sci. 10, 331–351 (2013)
3. C.M. Baker, M. Bode, Placing invasive species management in a spatiotemporal context. Ecol.
Appl. 26, 712–725 (2016)
4. C.M. Baker, F. Diele, D. Lacitignola, C. Marangi, A. Martiradonna, Optimal control of invasive
species through a dynamical systems approach. Nonlinear Anal. Real Word Appl. (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2019.02.007
5. C.M. Baker, F. Diele, C. Marangi, A. Martiradonna, S Ragni, Optimal spatiotemporal effort
allocation for invasive species removal incorporating a removal handling time and budget. Nat.
Resour. Model. 31(4), e12190 (2018)
6. K. Burnett, S. Pongkijvorasin, J. Roumasset, Species invasion as catastrophe: the case of the
brown tree snake. Environ. Resour. Econ. 51, 241–254 (2012)
7. M. Chalak, D.J. Pannell, Optimising control of an agricultural weed in sheep-production
pastures. Agric. Syst. 109, 1–8 (2012)
8. M. Chalak-Haghighi, E.C. van Ierland, G.W. Bourdot, D. Leathwick, Management strategies
for an invasive weed: a dynamic programming approach for Californian thistle in New Zealand.
N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 51, 409–424 (2008)
9. M.A. Davis, M.K. Chew, R.J. Hobbs, A.E. Lugo, J.J. Ewel, G.J. Vermeij, J.H. Brown, M.L.
Rosenzweig, M.R. Gardener, S.P. Carroll, et al. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature
474(7350), 153 (2011)
10. F. Diele, C. Marangi, S. Ragni, SB(3) A splitting for approximation of invariants in time-
dependent Hamiltonian systems. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(6), 2798–2807 (2010)
11. European Commission Staff, WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accom-
panying the document Proposal for a Council and European Parliament Regulation on the
prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species (2013).
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0321
12. J.E. Flux, Relative effect of cats, myxomatosis, traditional control, or competitors in removing
rabbits from islands. N. Z. J. Zool. 20(1), 13–18 (1993)
13. S. Lenhart, J.T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models (Chapman &
Hall/CRC, London, 2007)
14. C. Lever, Naturalized Animals: The Ecology of Successfully Introduced Species (T & AD
Poyser Ltd, London, 1994)
15. A.M. Melodie, S.H.M. Butchart, D. Spear, E. Marais, E.J. Kleynhans, A. Symes, J. Chanson,
M. Hoffmann. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact
and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 16(1), 95–108 (2010)
16. D.I.S. Odom, O.J. Cacho, J.A. Sinden, G.R. Griffith, Policies for the management of weeds in
natural ecosystems: the case of scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius, L.) in an Australian National
Park. Ecol. Econ. 44, 119–135 (2003)
17. L.S. Pontryagin, V.G. Boltyanskii, R.V. Gamkrelize, E.F. Mishchenko, The Mathematical
Theory of Optimal Processes (Wiley, New York, 1962)
Part II
Approximation Theory and Special
Functions: Fourth Series
This session was the fourth edition of a series of mini-symposia which bring
together researchers from all areas of Approximation Theory and Special Functions.
The first one was organized within the international conference ICNAAM 2013 in
Greece, the second one in MDS 2014 in Bulgaria, and the third one in ETAMM
2016 in France.
The highlighted topics (but not limited to) were: Classical approximation,
Korovkin-type approximation, Statistical approximation, Interpolation, Fuzzy
approximation, Summability, Timescales, Constructive approximation, Orthogonal
polynomials, Generating functions, Matrix-valued polynomials, q-Analysis,
Fractional analysis, General orthogonal systems, and Fourier analysis.
Extended Multivariable Hypergeometric
Functions
1 Introduction
D. Korkmaz-Duzgun ()
Kafkas University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business
Administration, Kars, Turkey
e-mail: dkduzgun@kafkas.edu.tr
E. Erkuş-Duman
Gazi University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Ankara, Turkey
e-mail: eduman@gazi.edu.tr
follows [11]:
(ρ)l
If we set κl = (σ )l , ρ = σ , and p = q = 0 in (2), then (2) becomes the classical
beta function [10].
By a similar idea, they had extended hypergeometric and confluent hypergeomet-
ric functions, respectively, as follows [11]:
{Kl }l∈N0
{Kl }l∈N0
∞
B (β+n,γ −β) x n
Fp,q (α, β; γ ; x) = (α)n p,q B(β,γ −β) n! ,
n=0 (3)
and
{Kl }l∈N0
{Kl }l∈N0
∞
Bp,q (β+n,γ −β) x n
Φp,q (β; γ ; x) = B(β,γ −β) n! , (4)
n=0
(Re(γ ) > Re(β) > 0, min {Re(p), Re(q)} ≥ 0) .
(ρ)l
If we set κl = (σ )l , ρ = σ , and p = q = 0 in (3), (4) then (3) and (4) become
classical hypergeometric and confluent hypergeometric functions, respectively (see
[10]).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
between May 1, 1898, and June 30, 1899.
VOLUNTEERS.
United States 1 87
2,836 3 111
Cuba 3 39 10 16
457 2 12
Porto Rico 3 1
157 5
Hawaiian Islands
33 1
Philippine Islands 14 146 3 67 5
215 6
At sea 5
122 2
HOMICIDE
Off. Enl. Off. Enl. Off.
Enl. Off. Enl.
REGULARS.
United States 1 16 19
18 35 993
Cuba 7 5
6 32 650
Porto Rico 1 3
1 3 81
Hawaiian Islands 1
12
Philippine Islands 19 1 3
1 10 256
At sea 1 4 2
6 94
Total 2 48 1 32
26 86 2,086
VOLUNTEERS.
United States 23 1 15
22 91 3,008
Cuba 4
3 21 525
Porto Rico 2 1
1 1 169
Hawaiian Islands
34
Philippine Islands 1 9 3
23 446
At sea 2 1
5 127
Total 1 40 1 20
26 141 4,309
Aggregate 3 88 2 52
52 224 6,395
{630}
VOLUNTEERS.
Cuba 3 39 15 218 18
257 275
Porto Rico 3 2 21 2
24 26
Philippines,
to Aug. 13, 1898 11 9 74 9
85 94
Philippines, since
February 4, 1899 14 135 62 865 76
1,000 1,076
HOSPITALS.
Beds.
20 field division hospitals, averaging 250 beds
each 5,000
31 general hospitals with a total capacity of
about 13,800
Railroad ambulance train
270
4 hospital ships
1,000
Total
20,070
Revolvers 75
{631}
Total. 4,651,200
Officers. 99
Enlisted men. 1,675
CASUALTIES IN ACTION.
from wounds
Action at Manila Bay,
May 1 9 9
Action off Cienfuegos,
May 11 12 1 11
1
Action off Cardenas,
May 11. 8 5 3
Action off San Juan,
Porto Rico, May 12 8 1 7
Engagements at Guantanamo,
Cuba, June 11 to 20 22 *6 16
Engagement off Santiago:
June 22 10 1 9
July 3 11 1 10
Miscellaneous:
Yankee, June 13. 1 1
Eagle, July 12 1 1
Bancroft, August 2 1 1
Amphitrite, August 7 1 1 †l
Total 84 16 68
2
Congressional Record,
February 1, 1901, pages 1941-1962.
"The result of our own testing and of all the analyses made at
our instance … is that the canned meat which has been brought
to our attention is pure, sound, and nutritive. It has not
been found to contain any acids or any deleterious substance,
but to be unadulterated meat. The testimony before us is that
the canned meat is not, in general, intended to be issued to
troops except as an emergency ration. The preponderance of the
proof is that meat on the hoof and the refrigerated beef are
more acceptable. A number of officers and others have
testified that the meat is unpalatable. Its palatability
greatly depends upon the mode in which it is cooked. In a
tropical climate, carried on the march, exposed to heat, the
meat so changes in appearance as to become repulsive. In the
Navy, where the meat is properly cared for, there has been no
complaint, so far as has appeared in evidence before us. After
careful consideration we find that canned meat, as issued to
the troops, was generally of good quality, was properly
prepared, and contained no deleterious substance.
{632}
At times probably material of poor quality is issued; in one
of the cans sent to us and examined by the chemist a large
amount of gristle was found. That it was not issued 'under
pretense of an experiment' is indicated by the fact that it
has been in use in the Army for more than 20 years."
"5. That the demand made upon the resources of the Department
in the care of sick and wounded was very much greater than had
been anticipated, and consequently, in like proportion, these
demands were imperfectly met.
{633}
The Nation,
May 11, 1899.
"No one in authority has been willing to admit that there was
the slightest thing wrong, or the least need for improvement
in his department. … This is another of the hundreds of
examples which have occurred in our past war, and which will
continue to take place in the future until the whole staff
system of the army has been rectified, of the reign of that
hide bound bureaucratic spirit which induces the head of a
department in Washington to decide in his office what should
be used by the troops in the field without practical
experience on the subject, and to stubbornly close his eyes
and ears to everything which will tend to show that it is
possible that his department has made a mistake. …