Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies Nathalia Peixoto Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies Nathalia Peixoto Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/automatic-control-systems-in-
biomedical-engineering-j-fernandez-de-canete/
https://textbookfull.com/product/control-applications-for-
biomedical-engineering-systems-1st-edition-ahmad-taher-azar-
editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/viii-latin-american-conference-
on-biomedical-engineering-and-xlii-national-conference-on-
biomedical-engineering-cesar-a-gonzalez-diaz/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biomedical-information-
technology-biomedical-engineering-2nd-edition-david-dagan-feng-
editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nanophotonics-in-biomedical-
engineering-xiangwei-zhao/
https://textbookfull.com/product/innovations-in-biomedical-
engineering-marek-gzik/
https://textbookfull.com/product/current-trends-in-biomedical-
engineering-and-bioimages-analysis-proceedings-of-the-21st-
polish-conference-on-biocybernetics-and-biomedical-engineering-
Nathalia Peixoto
Margarida Silveira
Hesham H. Ali
Carlos Maciel
Egon L. van den Broek (Eds.)
Biomedical Engineering
Systems and Technologies
10th International Joint Conference, BIOSTEC 2017
Porto, Portugal, February 21–23, 2017
Revised Selected Papers
123
Communications
in Computer and Information Science 881
Commenced Publication in 2007
Founding and Former Series Editors:
Alfredo Cuzzocrea, Xiaoyong Du, Orhun Kara, Ting Liu, Dominik Ślęzak,
and Xiaokang Yang
Editorial Board
Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio),
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Phoebe Chen
La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
Joaquim Filipe
Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
Igor Kotenko
St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian
Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
Krishna M. Sivalingam
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
Takashi Washio
Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Junsong Yuan
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, USA
Lizhu Zhou
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7899
Nathalia Peixoto Margarida Silveira
•
Biomedical Engineering
Systems and Technologies
10th International Joint Conference, BIOSTEC 2017
Porto, Portugal, February 21–23, 2017
Revised Selected Papers
123
Editors
Nathalia Peixoto Carlos Maciel
George Mason University University of Sao Paulo
Fairfax, VA Sao Carlos, SP
USA Brazil
Margarida Silveira Egon L. van den Broek
Instituto Superior Técnico (IST) Utrecht University
University of Lisbon Utrecht
Lisbon The Netherlands
Portugal
Hesham H. Ali
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Omaha, NE
USA
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing AG
part of Springer Nature
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
The present book includes extended and revised versions of a set of selected papers
from the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and
Technologies (BIOSTEC 2017), held in Porto, Portugal, during February 21–23, 2017.
BIOSTEC is composed of five co-located conferences, each specialized in a different
knowledge area, namely, BIODEVICES, BIOIMAGING, BIOINFORMATICS, BIO-
SIGNALS, and HEALTHINF.
BIOSTEC 2017 received 297 paper submissions from 56 countries, of which only
6% are included in this book. This reflects our care in selecting contributions. These
papers were selected by the conference chairs on the basis of a number of criteria that
include the classifications and comments provided by the Program Committee mem-
bers, the session chairs’ assessment, and the program chairs’ meta-review of the papers
that were included in the technical program. The authors of selected papers were
invited to submit a revised, extended, and improved version of their conference paper,
including at least 30% new material.
The purpose of the BIOSTEC joint conferences is to bring together researchers and
practitioners, including engineers, biologists, health professionals, and
informatics/computer scientists. Research presented at BIOSTEC included both theo-
retical advances and applications of information systems, artificial intelligence, signal
processing, electronics, and other engineering tools in areas related to advancing
biomedical research and improving health care.
The papers included in this book contribute to the understanding of relevant research
trends in biomedical engineering systems and technologies. As such, they provide an
overview of the field’s current state of the art.
We thank the authors for their contributions and Monica Saramago for process
management. In particular, we express our gratitude to the reviewers, who helped to
ensure the quality of this publication.
Conference Co-chairs
Ana Fred Instituto de Telecomunicações/IST, Portugal
Hugo Gamboa LIBPHYS-UNL/FCT - New University of Lisbon,
Portugal
Mário Vaz INEGI LOME, FEUP, Portugal
Program Co-chairs
BIODEVICES
Nathalia Peixoto Neural Engineering Lab, George Mason University,
USA
BIOIMAGING
Margarida Silveira Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Portugal
BIOINFORMATICS
Hesham Ali University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA
BIOSIGNALS
Carlos Maciel University of São Paulo, Brazil
HEALTHINF
Egon L. van den Broek Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Invited Speakers
Bart M. ter Haar Romeny Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e),
The Netherlands
Kristina Höök Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
Bethany Bracken Charles River Analytics Inc., USA
Hugo Plácido da Silva IT, Institute of Telecommunications, Portugal
Contents
Bioimaging
Health Informatics
Abstract. The median sternotomy can rise in rib and/or sternum micro/
macro-fractures and/or brachial plexus injuries, which can even evolve in
chronic pain with significant impact on patient’s quality life. Post-sternotomy
chronic pain is recognized as a multifactorial complex issue, and it has been
assessed that sternum retraction forces, applied by the surgeons, can be con-
sidered one of these factors. In order to investigate the behavior of these forces,
we developed a reliable and sterilizable system, to monitor the retraction forces
along the hemisternums. Therefore, a Finochietto sternal retractor was instru-
mented by means of ultra-thin force sensors interfaced with ad hoc electronic
circuitry. Two different sets of sensors were adopted, one of which able to
support autoclave operating conditions. In-vitro tests were performed by means
of a made on purpose dummy. The instrumented retractor allows monitoring the
force exerted on both the arms during the opening procedure. Force versus time
patterns were acquired and stored, and so we determined how the forces are
distributed in terms of their mean, maximum and plateaus. Results demonstrate
the reliability of the instrumented retractor in measuring forces, up to 400 N.
Cost-effectiveness and feasibility can be considered further additional values of
the proposed instrumented retractor.
1 Introduction
The first median sternotomy has been performed in 1897, to remove lymph nodes.
Since then, only six decades after, the median sternotomy has become the standard
approach to the mediastinum, following Julian’s report [1] where the superiority over
thoracotomy was described underlining its less time-consuming, and higher tolerability
by the patients.
Briefly, to access the mediastinum through the median sternotomy, a skin incision
is made, approximately 2 cm under the sternal notch and extended below the xiphoid.
The exact midline over the sternum is marked with electrocautery to avoid faulty
sternotomy. Before the sternum incision is made, a pathway is create above the
suprasternal ligament and then continued beneath the manubrium and finally, per-
formed as well under the xiphoid to guarantee the separation of the mediastinum
structures from the posterior sternum bone.
Although, in comparison to extensive thoracotomy, midline sternotomy is less
traumatic, persistent postoperative pain remain the Achilles’ heel, affecting negatively
early postoperative respiratory function, delayed hospital discharge and increasing
costs [2–4]. The process of pain is difficult to assess [5], anyway the pain is considered
chronic when localized in the surgical site and persist over three months. In a
prospective study, a number of independent predictors for persistent thoracic pain
following sternotomy were identified, including urgent surgery, and re-sternotomy [6].
In this study, at one year, 42 (35%) patients reported chronic thoracic pain. Similarly,
another work reported the prevalence of post-operative pain as high as 39.3% at the
mean time of 28 months after surgery [7]. In 2001, Mazzeffi and Khelemsky [8]
estimated a 28% overall incidence of non-cardiac pain one year after surgery. Several
studies assessed that women are substantially more likely to suffer early and chronic
postoperative pain than men [6, 9], and that the prevalence of post-sternotomy chronic
pain decreases with age [6, 8]. These studies highlight the negative impact on daily life
of the population who experienced sternotomy and suffer postoperative pain. In fact
with the introduction of less invasive surgical procedures to treat cardiac pathologies,
although with limited surgical field, surgeons who are in favor claim that it is not only
cosmetic, but guaranteeing better and faster post-operative recovery.
Chronic post-sternotomy pain can be related to patient’s age, gender and degen-
erative process like osteoporosis. It can be also related directly to the surgical proce-
dure, including secondary sternal osteomyelitis and/or sternocostal chondritis,
incomplete bone healing. If the internal thoracic arteries are harvested in myocardial
revascularization, the different retractors, used to facilitated vessel exposure, add
additional trauma. In this contest the way of harvesting and the use of ellectrocautery
might affect wound healing and persistence pain.
To access to the mediastinum, retractors are being used to allow adequate surgical
field. Hemi-sternums separation extent of the force impressed during sternum opening
might lead to rib fracture, eventually associated to brachial plexus injury (BPI) [10–14].
Thus, there is an actual clinical need to provide to the surgeons suitable instrumented
retractors able to monitor in real time the forces exerted on the two halves during the
sternum opening procedure. In this way, by monitoring forces applied on the sternum,
it will be possible to find the balance between adequate surgical field and excessive
trauma to the chest. By evaluating major risk factors, width chest opening can be
tailored to the patients. For example if female gender is prone to chronic pain, chest
separation should be reduced to minimum.
Furthermore, with the increasing interest of shifting the cardiac surgery procedures
from full to partial sternotomy, including the “J” and “T” incisions, the proposed study
might be useful to evaluate and compare the forces applied on the sternum in the
An Electronic-Engineered Sensory Sternal Retractor Aimed 5
various surgical approaches to determine the best access, allowing at the same time the
optimal surgical view and successively good quality of life.
Only few data are available for the actual value of the forces exerted by a retractor
on the skeletal cage, dummy reproduced [15], or of corpses or animal models [16].
Aigner et al. [17] pointed out that data obtained from human patients are not presently
available in the literature probably due to the lack of an instrumented sternal retractor
readily suitable for the translation to surgery.
For this purpose, we designed and realized a sterilizable system based on a com-
monly adopted straight sternal retractor (Finocchietto) equipped with ultrathin force
sensors and conditioning electronic circuitry. The forces experienced during the
retraction were monitored in real-time by means of a home-made dummy.
The idea is to acquire data on the intensity and distribution of exerted retraction
forces during hemi-sternums separation in view of future challenging clinical studies
aimed to reduce the risk of chronic post-sternotomy pain.
2 Materials
A commonly adopted straight sternal retractor, Finochietto type (Fig. 1a), was equipped
with both ultra-thin force sensors (Fig. 1b and c) and electronic circuitry. The resulting
electronic-engineered “sensory retractor” was tested by means of a home-made dummy.
back
Fig. 1. (a) The Finochietto retractor equipped with the four sensors placed in positions designed
from 1 to 4 according to the figure. (b) The ultra-thin force sensors, HT201 (top) and A201
(bottom) types. (c) Aluminum sensors’ housings: front, back and cover [15].
6 G. Saggio et al.
Fig. 2. (a) LRX (Lloyd Instrument) testing machine used for sensor characterization under
compression, (b) and (c) Load cells used for sensor characterization.
An Electronic-Engineered Sensory Sternal Retractor Aimed 7
In such a way, the electric voltage value is referred to the force applied. The voltage
signal is amplified, calibrated and compensated with temperature, then processed by an
algorithm to correct the device nonlinearity. Consequently, the value of the applied
force was determined, taking into account deformation and material characteristics.
Two load cells of 50 N and 500 N, respectively (Fig. 2a and b) were used for sensor
characterization.
RP
VOUT ¼ VBIAS ð1Þ
RSENS þ RP
The values of each shunt resistors RP was determined taking into account some
needs. In particular, RP has to protect each sensor against excessive currents, and has to
guarantee the largest-as-possible output voltage swing so to allow adequate resolution
for the following digital conversion. With a force value ranging from 1 to 400 N, the
sensor resistance span of 1 MX roughly. Since the maximum allowable current for the
sensor is 2.5 mA, when the sensor is in short circuit, the RP value must be higher than
5V
RP [ ¼ 2 kX ð2Þ
2:5 mA
but correctly determined as the geometric mean of the extreme sensor resistance values,
in accordance with the findings in [19].
8 G. Saggio et al.
Fig. 3. (a) Adopted front-end circuits for the four FlexiForce A201 and HT201 sensors,
(b) front-end circuit for the FlexiForce A201 and HT201 sensors recommended by Tekscan.
5V
VLSB ¼ ’ 4:9 mV ð3Þ
210 1
The minimum voltage from the front-end circuit, in case of zero applied force,
calculated by Eq. (1) with RSENS = 1 MX, should be greater than VLSB
RP
VOUTmin ¼ 5 V [ 4:9 mV ð4Þ
1 MX þ RP
Table 1. Serial packet transmission for data acquisition from a single sensor device.
Table 2. Serial packet transmission for simultaneous data acquisition from four sensor devices.
Language: English
CHAPTER I.
A MYSTERY SOMEWHERE.