Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Clinical Handbook of Interstitial Lung Disease 1St Edition Muhunthan Thillai Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Clinical Handbook of Interstitial Lung Disease 1St Edition Muhunthan Thillai Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/interstitial-lung-disease-
harold-r-collard-and-luca-richeldi-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/pathology-of-lung-disease-
morphology-pathogenesis-etiology-2nd-edition-helmut-h-popper/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lung-epithelial-biology-in-the-
pathogenesis-of-pulmonary-disease-venkataramana-k-sidhaye-and-
michael-koval-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-infectious-disease-
data-analysis-1st-edition-leonhard-held/
Handbook of Imaging in Pulmonary Disease 1st Edition
Subha Ghosh
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-imaging-in-
pulmonary-disease-1st-edition-subha-ghosh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-liver-
disease-4e-lawrence-friedman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-infectious-disease-
data-analysis-1st-edition-leonhard-held-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/liver-disease-in-clinical-
practice-1st-edition-tim-cross-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/oxford-handbook-of-clinical-
haematology-baglin/
Clinical Handbook of
Interstitial Lung Disease
Clinical Handbook of
Interstitial Lung Disease
Edited by
Muhunthan Thillai
Cambridge Interstitial Lung Disease Unit
Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
David R Moller
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and
Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School
of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Keith C Meyer
Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary,
Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Wisconsin School
of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. While all reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, neither the author[s] nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility or
liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publishers wish to make clear that any views or opinions expressed
in this book by individual editors, authors or contributors are personal to them and do not necessarily reflect the views/
opinions of the publishers. The information or guidance contained in this book is intended for use by medical, scientific or
health-care professionals and is provided strictly as a supplement to the medical or other professional’s own judgement, their
knowledge of the patient’s medical history, relevant manufacturer’s instructions and the appropriate best practice guidelines.
Because of the rapid advances in medical science, any information or advice on dosages, procedures or diagnoses should be
independently verified. The reader is strongly urged to consult the relevant national drug formulary and the drug companies’
and device or material manufacturers’ printed instructions, and their websites, before administering or utilizing any of the
drugs, devices or materials mentioned in this book. This book does not indicate whether a particular treatment is appropriate
or suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the sole responsibility of the medical professional to make his or her
own professional judgements, so as to advise and treat patients appropriately. The authors and publishers have also attempted
to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission
to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us
know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in
any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, micro-
filming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.
copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-
8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that
have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identifi-
cation and explanation without intent to infringe.
Foreword ix
Contributors xi
Introduction xv
vii
viii Contents
The Clinical Handbook of Interstitial Lung Disease, patterns. Throughout the book, the pathogenetic
edited by Drs. Thillai, Moller, and Meyer, provides mechanisms are discussed in detail, including
a comprehensive, thoughtful, and in depth review genetic associations and polymorphisms and
of the complexity of interstitial lung disease (ILD), external factors (inhaled irritants or allergens,
with a broad perspective provided by 60 authors smoking, environmental factors) that may influ-
with expertise in ILD. The book is extensively ref- ence clinical expression and course of ILD. Over
erenced, and provides insights suited not only for the past 30 years, several genetic mutations have
trainees but for clinicians and academicians at all been implicated in familial and sporadic ILDs.
levels with an interest in ILD. Initial epidemiological studies identified muta-
More than 200 ILDs have been identified, and tions in surfactant C and A proteins, and sub-
a logical approach requires the analysis of clinical, sequent studies identified a variety of genetic
radiographic, and histological patterns that may abnormalities (e.g., telomerase mutations, poly-
establish a precise and definitive diagnosis. The morphisms of MUC5B prometer gene, etc.).
first few chapters provide an overview of the evolv- Differences in the function of specific genetic loci
ing classification schema of ILD, the disparate affecting host defense, cell adhesion, and DNA
histological patterns of ILD, the use of thoracic may be central to the pathogenesis and clinical
imaging [particularly high-resolution thin-sec- expression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)
tion computed tomographic scanning (HRCT)] to and other ILDs. Investigations using peripheral
diagnose and follow ILDs, and clinical evaluation blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) or alveolar epi-
of patients with suspected ILD. These initial chap- thelial cells in IPF and other ILDs suggest that
ters, as well as those that follow, are replete with specific genetic profiles may be critical to the evo-
superb color photomicrographs and HRCT scans lution of the disease process, resulting in a rapid
to illustrate the salient findings of these various or slow disease progression, with associated dif-
ILDs. The major patterns (both radiographic and ferences in survival. A better understanding of
histologic) are discussed, including: acute and genetic risk factors for IPF and other ILDs may
chronic lung injury; airway-centered (bronchiolo- lead to improved phenotyping of disease and more
centric); alveolar filling (e.g., alveolar hemorrhage, targeted therapies.
pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, organising pneu- Clinical approach to ILD includes careful occu-
monia); nodular patterns (e.g., sarcoidosis, granu- pational history, exposures (drugs, inhaled anti-
lomatosis with polyangiitis, silicosis, Langerhans gens), demographics (age, gender), in addition to
cell histiocytosis (LCH), infections, malignancy); physical exam and radiographic tests. Blood tests
cystic patterns [(e.g., lymphangioleiomyomatosis may be critical to identify specific causes of ILD
(LAM), LCH, lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia such as connective tissue disease (CTD) or hyper-
(LIP)]; and mixed patterns. Further, the salient sensitivity pneumonia (HP). The role of invasive
features of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias techniques including bronchoscopy with bron-
(IIPs) are illustrated and discussed, with in-depth choalveolar lavage (BAL), endobronchial ultra-
discussion of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) sound-guided biopsies (EBUS), and surgical lung
and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) biopsy are discussed. Several authors emphasize the
ix
x Foreword
limitations, as well as risks, associated with these childhood ILD, and other rare ILDs. Within each
biopsy procedures, and present specific approaches chapter, sections on pathogenesis, epidemiology,
and recommendations. The diagnosis of ILD is not clinical, radiographic, and pathological features,
always straightforward, and collaboration among and management are discussed in depth. Specific
disciplines (e.g., clinicians, radiologists, patholo- aspects of ILD are addressed in separate chapters
gists) may be critical to narrow and establish the regarding: comorbidities; diagnosis and manage-
diagnosis. Three chapters (chapters 8–10) provide ment of critical illness in patients with ILD; and
in-depth discussion of IPF, the most common of role of lung transplantation for ILD.
the ILDs, including epidemiology, clinical fea- This book provides an outstanding perspec-
tures, diagnostic approach, and management of tive of the evolving field of ILD, and heightens
this disorder. In the chapters that follow, the major the imagination for future strategies to develop
types of ILD are discussed. Separate chapters more targeted therapies. One of the strengths
review specific entities including: hypersensitiv- of this book is the plethora of images (histologi-
ity pneumonitis; IIPs other than IPF; eosinophilic cal and radiographic) and comprehensive figures
interstitial lung disorders; ILD associated with and tables throughout. The references cited in this
CTD; sarcoidosis (both pulmonary and extrapul- book are extensive, and allow the reader to easily
monary); smoking-related ILD; drug-induced and retrieve the key sentinel articles in the field. This
iatrogenic ILD; occupational ILD; pulmonary vas- book is an outstanding review not only for Fellows
culitis and alveolar hemorrhage syndromes; cys- and trainees, but for clinicians and academicians
tic lung diseases; pulmonary alveolar proteinosis; with an interest in ILD.
Traci Adams, MD Andrew Bush, MBBS (HONS), MA, MD, FRCP, FRCPCH, FERS
Department of Medicine Imperial College London
University of Texas Southwestern and
Dallas, Texas National Heart and Lung Institute
Adam L Anderson, MD and
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Royal Brompton Harefield
Washington University School of Medicine NHS Foundation Trust
St. Louis, Missouri London, United Kingdom
The intention of writing this book is to provide best practice for their patients. In the near future,
readers a comprehensive overview of the lung dis- specific biomarkers will become validated that
ease entities that we recognize as the differing may be useful both in diagnosis and therapeutic
forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Our under- management of ILD. Additionally, our evolving
standing and characterization of these disorders understanding of the genetic underpinnings and
and recognition of the features which differentiate the role of epigenetic factors in disease risk and
the specific forms of ILD has evolved rapidly over disease behaviour will undoubtedly improve our
the past few decades. Whilst these advances have ability to provide better and safer therapies for
necessitated changes in classification schemes and specific forms of ILD. Our evolving knowledge of
terminology, new knowledge of the genetics and ILDs can also be used to construct better placebo-
histopathologic manifestations of specific forms of controlled, randomized clinical trials to identify
ILD have improved our ability to provide progno- effective therapies for specific forms of ILD, as
ses to patients, develop therapies that specifically has been recently accomplished with novel anti-
target individual forms of ILD (such as idiopathic fibrotic therapies for IPF.
pulmonary fibrosis – IPF) and provide personalized It is our hope that this book will enhance our
medicine to our patients. Providing the best care readers’ knowledge of the various aspects of the
to patients with ILD depends on the recognition disorders we recognize as specific forms of ILD,
of clues from their clinical presentation combined and inspire them to engage in meaningful clini-
with a careful physical examination, the use of state- cal and translational research. Those who provide
of-the-art thoracic imaging, and the use of tissue care to patients with ILD will find this book useful
sampling, when needed, to identify diagnostic his- in both their ability to diagnose ILD in the clinic
topathologic patterns and optimize the likelihood of and the provision of appropriate therapies to their
making an accurate and confident diagnosis. patients. We are greatly indebted to our authors
In the ideal setting, clinicians, thoracic radiolo- who were gracious enough to contribute their
gists, and lung pathologists should review all clini- chapters, and we believe that this compendium of
cal, radiological, and histopathologic data together knowledge and clinical wisdom will provide a firm
for any patient with a complex presentation of ILD foundation for all clinicians who diagnose and
to reach a consensus diagnosis and provide the manage patients with ILD.
Muhunthan Thillai
David R Moller
Keith C Meyer
December 2017
xv
1
An overview of the classification and
diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
KEITH C MEYER
1
2 An overview of the classification and diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
Figure 1.1 Evolution of classification systems for interstitial lung disease and forms of idiopathic
interstitial pneumonia. (Abbreviations: AIP = acute interstitial pneumonia; BIP = bronchiolitis inter-
stitial pneumonia; CFA = cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis; COP = cryptogenic organizing pneumonia;
CTD = connective tissue disease; DIP = desquamative interstitial pneumonia; DPLD = diffuse paren-
chymal lung disease; GIP = giant cell interstitial pneumonia; HP = hypersensitivity pneumonia; ILIP =
idiopathic lymphoid interstitial pneumonia; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; IPPFE = idiopathic
pleuropulmonary fibrosis; LAM = lymphangioleiomyomatosis; NSIP = non-specific interstitial pneu-
monia; PLCH = pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis; RBILD = respiratory bronchiolitis interstitial
lung disease; UIIP = undifferentiated interstitial pneumonia; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia.)
classification system and refined the histopathol- form of organizing pneumonia (aka bronchiolitis
ogy-based system by adding two new categories obliterans organizing pneumonia [BOOP]) or dif-
(non-specific interstitial pneumonia [NSIP] and fuse alveolar damage (DAD). They also correlated
respiratory-bronchiolitis-associated ILD [RBILD]) their histopathologic pattern-based classification
while revising/retaining some of Liebow’s catego- system with clinical features and natural history.
ries (UIP and desquamative interstitial pneumo- With the evolution of ongoing clinical and patho-
nia [DIP]): acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP) was logic investigations of ILD from the late twentieth
coined as a term for the Hamman–Rich syndrome century to the present era combined with the advent
(Figure 1.1). Their scheme recognized giant cell of thoracic high-resolution computed tomography
interstitial pneumonia (GIP) as caused by hard- (HRCT) imaging, schemes for the classification of
metal exposure and considered lymphoid inter- ILD that melded clinical syndromes, histopatho-
stitial pneumonia (LIP) as a lymphoproliferative logic changes and HRCT imaging together to
disorder, while bronchiolitis interstitial pneu- define specific diagnostic entities were formulated
monia (BIP) was recognized as an intraluminal (6–10). However, it also became apparent that his-
(rather than interstitial) process that could take the topathologic patterns could have overlap among
Current classification systems for ILD 3
clinical entities (e.g. a UIP pattern can be idio- Table 1.1 Classification of interstitial lung disease
pathic and consistent with a diagnosis of idiopathic (diffuse parenchymal lung disease)
pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], or a UIP pattern can be
1. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia
associated with CTD accompanied by lung involve-
• Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (i.e. idiopathic
ment). Finally, classification schemes will undoubt-
usual interstitial pneumonia)
edly change as we identify causative genomic and
• Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)
epigenetic determinants that appear to be operant
• Desquamative interstitial pneumonia
in risk and causation of the myriad forms of ILD
(DIP)
(11–15), and understanding the genomics of ILD
• Respiratory bronchiolitis-associated
will likely lead to improved, personalized therapies.
interstitial lung disease (RBILD)
• Acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP)
CURRENT CLASSIFICATION • Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP)
SYSTEMS FOR ILD • Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia
(idiopathic)
• Pleuro-parenchymal fibroelastosis
The pantheon of more than 200 forms of ILD can be
(idiopathic)
classified in a variety of ways. An updated consensus
• Non-classifiable interstitial pneumonia
classification system (Figure 1.1) forged by expert
(NCIP)
opinion (while using a multidisciplinary approach
2. Connective tissue disease associated
that combined clinical characteristics with histo-
• Rheumatoid arthritis
pathologic and HRCT patterns) segregated the vari-
• Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)
ous forms of ILD into four major categories while
• Anti-synthetase syndromes
focusing on the category of IIPs was published
• Sjögren syndrome
in 2002 (6) and updated in 2013 (7). Alternative
• Systemic lupus erythematosus
approaches that also focus on the combination of
• Ankylosing spondylitis
etiologies, clinical presentation and findings, radio-
3. Primary disease related
logic imaging patterns and histopathologic char-
• Sarcoidosis
acteristics can also be used to represent a clinically
• Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis
useful classification system (Tables 1.1 and 1.2).
(PLCH)
Forms of ILD can be differentiated by acute (e.g.
• Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
acute interstitial pneumonia [AIP]) versus chronic
• Eosinophilic lung disease related (e.g.
onset (e.g. UIP), disorders that tend to be more
eosinophilic pneumonia)
responsive to anti-inflammatory/immunosuppres-
• Chronic aspiration
sive therapies (e.g. sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity
• Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP)
pneumonitis [HP], CTD-associated ILD, intersti-
• Amyloidosis
tial pneumonia with autoimmune features [IPAF],
• Inflammatory bowel disease associated
cryptogenic organizing pneumonia [COP]) versus
• Hepatic disease associated (e.g. primary
those unlikely to respond to such therapy (e.g. UIP,
biliary cirrhosis, viral hepatitis)
pneumoconioses), disorders that may remit with
• Mimics of ILD (infection or malignancy
appropriate therapy but have a propensity to relapse
associated)
(e.g. COP), disorders linked to exposures (e.g. pneu-
4. Iatrogenic
moconioses, HP), lung-limited disorders (e.g. IIPs)
• Drug induced
versus those linked to extrapulmonary disease pro-
• Radiation pneumonitis/fibrosis
cesses (e.g. sarcoidosis, CTD-associated ILD), those
5. Inhalational exposure related (occupational or
caused by therapeutic interventions for pulmonary
environmental)
or non-pulmonary disorders (e.g. iatrogenic ILD
• Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (organic
due to drug reactions or radiation therapy) and
antigen inhalation)
those that are caused by inherited gene variants (e.g.
• Acute/subacute
Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome).
• Chronic fibrosing
Regardless of the classification system utilized to
characterize and define the various forms of ILD, (Continued)
4 An overview of the classification and diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
Table 1.1 (Continued ) Classification of interstitial was initially used by clinicians to signify cases of
lung disease (diffuse parenchymal lung disease) pulmonary fibrosis of unknown cause (16). In the
• Inorganic dust/fibre/fume related decades leading up to statements and clinical prac-
• Pneumoconiosis (e.g. asbestosis, silicosis, tice guidelines published over the past two decades,
hard metal lung disease) cases with overlapping clinical features and imaging
• Other (e.g. berylliosis, chronic beryllium characteristics (e.g. non-IPF forms of IIP, chronic
disease, gaseous phase agents) HP, CTD-associated ILD, IPAF) were typically
6. Inherited lung disease lumped together and assigned a diagnosis of IPF
• Familial interstitial pneumonia (FIP) (or cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis [CFA]) by clini-
• Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome (HPS) cians despite the heterogeneity of histopathologic
• Other (e.g. metabolic storage diseases) findings and clinical features. As the most common
7. Miscellaneous disorders form of IIP encountered in the clinic, the term ‘IPF’
• Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune has been retained but is now specifically defined
features (IPAF) according to the key features of a consistent clinical
• Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage presentation, the presence of a confident UIP pat-
(e.g. Goodpasture syndrome) tern on HRCT imaging, exclusion of other poten-
• Idiopathic diffuse alveolar haemorrhage tial diagnoses, and, if needed, a UIP pattern on lung
• Acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia biopsy specimens if the HRCT does not adequately
(AFOP) identify a typical UIP pattern (17). However, a
• Bronchiolocentric pattern of interstitial definitive diagnosis may not be forthcoming despite
pneumonia obtaining HRCT imaging and an adequately sam-
pled lung biopsy specimen, and a multidisciplinary
considerable overlap will continue to exist among discussion may be required to facilitate interob-
various observations used to differentiate many server agreement and reach a consensus diagnosis
of these disorders from one another. Despite such (18–21). A search for evidence of CTD is also essen-
overlap, however, findings such as Velcro-like crack- tial, as UIP, NSIP, AIP or DIP patterns can be seen
les on chest auscultation, which are usually detected when patients have CTD-associated ILD (22) or an
in patients with IPF but may be present with other interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features
ILD with advanced fibrosis, can narrow the differen- (IPAF) for which criteria for a specific CTD diagno-
tial diagnosis. Other examples include finding a UIP sis are not met (23). Making an accurate diagnosis of
radiologic and/or histopathologic pattern, which can a specific form of IIP can be even more challenging
be seen not only in IPF but also other ILD such as when clinical and laboratory data are present that
CTD-associated ILD, chronic HP, asbestosis or drug suggest a diagnosis of CTD but criteria for a specific
reactions, or by detecting a significant lymphocy- CTD are not met. Patients with this situation can be
tosis in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), which classified as having IPAF, but if the only finding is a
essentially rules out IPF but implicates other entities positive anti-nuclear antibody or rheumatoid factor
such as sarcoidosis, acute HP or cellular NSIP, and without any other criteria for a diagnosis of CTD or
can considerably narrow a differential diagnosis and IPAF, a diagnosis of an idiopathic IIP (e.g. IPF) can
help attain an ultimate, confident diagnosis. One still be assigned and maintained (although some
must put all the data together to navigate through patients may develop criteria for a diagnosis of CTD
various levels of potential overlap among charac- as their disease evolves over time).
teristics of specific entities to arrive at a consensus The updated statement on multidisciplinary
clinical–radiologic–pathologic diagnosis that is con- classification of the IIPs (7) recognizes that some
sistent with the specific disease at hand. cases that appear to be consistent with an IIP diag-
nosis may not satisfy criteria that allow diagnosis
as a specific form of IIP. Circumstances in which a
IDIOPATHIC INTERSTITIAL final diagnosis may not be reached include a lack of
PNEUMONIAS adequate clinical, radiologic or pathologic data to
allow a specific diagnosis to be rendered or major
The usage and definition of the term ‘idiopathic pul- discordance among clinical, radiologic and patho-
monary fibrosis’ have changed considerably since it logic findings that preclude reaching a specific
Genetics of ILD: Potential impact on classification and terminology 5
diagnosis. One example of when this situation mutations and polymorphisms (Table 1.3), and
may exist is when previous therapies (e.g. cortico- an evolving understanding of genomics has also
steroids) may have altered subsequent radiologic identified numerous epigenetic mechanisms that
imaging characteristics or histologic findings are associated with the pathogenesis of many
obtained at the time a patient undergoes a diag- forms of ILD (11–15). Telomere dysfunction,
nostic evaluation for suspected IIP. polymorphisms for the MUC5B gene, and a vari-
ety of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for genes
such as TOLLIP or TLR3 have been associated
GENETICS OF ILD: POTENTIAL
with both disease risk and behaviour for patients
IMPACT ON CLASSIFICATION
with IPF. Ongoing studies are likely to discover
AND TERMINOLOGY many other genetic factors that are associated
with various ILD diagnoses and identify specific
Many forms of ILD/pulmonary fibrosis have genotype– phenotype relationships that modu-
recently been linked to specific inherited gene late the natural history of disease and/or interact
6 An overview of the classification and diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
with environmental risk factors to increase risk CTD serologies, other testing as appropriate) com-
of developing a specific ILD entity. As useful bio- bined with the history, physical examination and
markers of disease and genomics of ILD progress, routine chest radiographic imaging (postero-ante-
classification systems are likely to change in accor- rior and lateral view x-rays) may be adequate to
dance with new discoveries in the field. establish a reasonably confident ILD diagnosis.
If additional diagnostic testing is needed, a non-
contrast, HRCT that is performed at full inspiration
with both supine and prone positioning and expira-
CURRENT APPROACH TO tory views can provide essential diagnostic informa-
MAKING A CONFIDENT ILD tion. If HRCT scan results show a definite radiologic
DIAGNOSIS pattern of UIP (subpleural and basilar predominant
changes, reticular pattern, honeycomb change with
A systematic approach (24) is required to accurately or without traction bronchiectasis and absence of
diagnose specific forms of ILD (Figure 1.2). Most features that are inconsistent with a UIP pattern),
patients present with new onset of symptoms such a confident diagnosis of IPF can be made if clinical
as dyspnoea on exertion, cough and/or fatigue, but features do not suggest the presence of a non-IPF ILD
asymptomatic or relatively asymptomatic patients diagnosis such as ILD associated with CTD-ILD.
with earlier stages of disease may be identified when If a confident ILD diagnosis cannot be made
interstitial abnormalities are an incidental finding via findings from the clinical presentation and
on thoracic imaging obtained for other indica- evaluation combined with HRCT imaging results,
tions. A careful and comprehensive interview that invasive testing must be considered to secure a
includes whether there is a history of medication/ diagnosis. Bronchoscopy is relatively safe, and
drug exposures (e.g. amiodarone, nitrofurantoin, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and/or endoscopic
methotrexate), occupational or environmental lung biopsies may provide very useful informa-
exposures or a history of CTD should be obtained tion that can be diagnostic, especially when com-
and can provide important clues to an ultimate bined with other clinical data and HRCT imaging.
diagnosis. Physical examination may reveal basi- However, bronchoscopy may be perceived as
lar ‘Velcro-like’ crackles on lung auscultation, the unlikely to secure a diagnosis, especially if a form
presence of digital clubbing, or other findings that of IIP is suspected to be present.
are suggestive of specific forms of ILD such as IPF. Progression to a more invasive type of lung
Laboratory testing (pulmonary function testing, biopsy without performing bronchoscopy may be
Current approach to making a confident ILD diagnosis 7
Suspected ILD
HRCT
No
Yes No
Figure 1.2 A suggested algorithm for ILD diagnosis. (Abbreviations: HRCT = high-resolution com-
puted tomography of the thorax; ILD = interstitial lung disease.)
reasonable, and such may be required if bronchos- should be held to attain an ultimate, ‘best fit’
copy is performed but does not provide diagnostic diagnosis. Bronchoscopic lung cryobiopsy (BLC),
findings. Obtaining a surgical lung biopsy (SLB), which can retrieve much larger tissue specimens
which is usually performed via a video-assisted than endoscopic transbronchial biopsies, may
thorascopic surgery (VATS) approach, remains the become an alternative to SLB, but the utility of
procedure of choice at most centres if other diag- BLC remains to be determined (25).
nostic testing cannot allow a confident diagnosis
to be made. However, patients at high risk for seri-
ous complications if a SLB is performed may not
SUMMARY
be good candidates to undergo the procedure, and
patients should thoroughly understand the poten-
tial risks and benefits of SLB. Ideally, multidisci- Classification schemes that encompass and dis-
plinary discussions among clinicians, radiologists, tinguish among the various forms of ILD have
and pathologists (if tissue biopsies are obtained) evolved tremendously over recent decades and
8 An overview of the classification and diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
will continue to change as our knowledge of these 8. Collard HR, King TE Jr. Diffuse lung disease:
disorders, especially their genetic and genomic Classification and evaluation. In: Baughman
underpinnings and causative/modulatory epi- RP, du Bois RM, eds. Diffuse Lung Disease:
genetic factors, evolves. Nonetheless, such clas- A Practical Approach. 2nd ed. New York,
sification schemes continue to have some degree NY: Springer; 2012:85–100.
of redundancy and overlap. When clinicians 9. Gomez AD, King TE Jr. Classification of
encounter a patient with signs and symptoms diffuse parenchymal lung disease. In:
of ILD, a systematic approach that evaluates the Costabel U, du Bois RM, Egan JJ, eds.
combination of clinical features, potential risk Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease, Progress
factors and exposures, appropriate laboratory in Respiratory Research. Basel: Karger;
testing, measurements of lung function, thoracic 2007;36:2–10.
imaging characteristics and, if needed, histopath- 10. Leslie KO. My approach to interstitial lung
ologic patterns in adequately sampled lung biopsy disease using clinical, radiological and
specimens is likely to lead to a confident diagnosis histopathological patterns. J Clin Pathol.
of a specific form of ILD. The currently used ILD 2009;62:387–401.
classification systems will continue to evolve and 11. Devine MS, Garcia CK. Clin Chest Med.
change as useful biomarkers and genetic factors 2012;33:95–110.
that are indicative of specific disorders are discov- 12. Mathai SK, Schwartz DA, Warg LA.
ered and incorporated into diagnostic algorithms Genetic susceptibility and pulmonary fibro-
and classification schemes that point to causation sis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20:429–35.
as well as potential responses to specific therapies. 13. Chu SG, El-Chemaly S, Rosas IO.
Genetics and idiopathic interstitial pneu-
REFERENCES monias. Semin Respir Crit Care Med.
2016;37:321–30.
1. Osler W. The Principles and Practice of 14. Mathai SK, Yang IV, Schwarz MI, Schwartz
Medicine. New York, NY: Appleton; 1892. DA. Incorporating genetics into the identi-
2. Scadding JG. Diffuse pulmonary alveolar fication and treatment of idiopathic pulmo-
fibrosis. Thorax. 1974;29:271–81. nary fibrosis. BMC Med. 2015;13:191.
3. Liebow AA, Carrington DB. The intersti- 15. Yang IV, Schwartz DA. Epigenetics of
tial pneumonias. In: Simon M, Potchen idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Transl Res.
EJ, LeMay M, eds. Frontiers of Pulmonary 2015;165:48–60.
Radiology. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 16. Meyer KC. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A
1969:102–41. historical perspective. In: Meyer KC, Nathan
4. Liebow AA. Definition and classification of SD, eds. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A
interstitial pneumonias in human pathology. Comprehensive Clinical Guide. New York,
Prog Respir Res. 1975;8:1–33. NY: Humana Press, Springer; 2014:1–8.
5. Katzenstein ALA, Myers JL. Am J Respir Crit 17. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ et al. An
Care Med. 1998;157:1301–15. official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement:
6. American Thoracic Society/European Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Evidence-
Respiratory Society International based guidelines for diagnosis and man-
Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of agement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am J 2011;183:788–824.
Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:277–304. 18. Flaherty KR, King TE Jr, Raghu G et al.
7. Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM et al. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: What is
An official American Thoracic Society/ the effect of a multidisciplinary approach
European Respiratory Society statement: to diagnosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
Update of the international multidisciplinary 2004;170:904–10.
classification of the idiopathic interstitial 19. Walsh SL, Wells AU, Desai SR et al.
pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Multicentre evaluation of multidisciplinary
2013;188(6):733–48. team meeting agreement on diagnosis
References 9
in diffuse parenchymal lung disease: A 23. Fischer A, Antoniou KM, Brown KK et al.
case-cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. An official European Respiratory Society/
2016;4:557–65. American Thoracic Society research
20. Meyer, KC. Multidisciplinary discussions and statement: Interstitial pneumonia with
interstitial lung disease diagnosis: How useful autoimmune features. Eur Respir J.
is a meeting of the minds? Lancet Respir Med. 2015;46:976–87.
2016;4:529–31. 24. Meyer KC. Diagnosis and management
21. Jo HE, Glaspole IN, Levin KC et al. Clinical of interstitial lung disease. Translat Respir
impact of the interstitial lung disease Med. 2014;2:4. doi: 10.1186/2213-0802-2-4.
multidisciplinary service. Respirology. eCollection 2014.
2016;21(8):1438–44. 25. Patel NM, Borczuk AC, Lederer DJ.
22. Swigris JJ, Brown KK, Flaherty KR. The Cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of interstitial
idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and con- lung disease. A step forward or back? Am J
nective tissue disease-associated inter- Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:707–9.
stitial lung disease. Curr Rheumatol Rev.
2010;6:91–98.
2
Histopathology of interstitial lung
disease: A pattern-based approach
11
12 Histopathology of interstitial lung disease