Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Economic Cycles in Emerging and Advanced Countries Synchronization International Spillovers and The Decoupling Hypothesis 1St Edition Antonio Pesce Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Economic Cycles in Emerging and Advanced Countries Synchronization International Spillovers and The Decoupling Hypothesis 1St Edition Antonio Pesce Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/optimal-currency-areas-and-the-
euro-volume-i-business-cycles-synchronization-johannes-kabderian-
dreyer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/global-business-cycles-and-
developing-countries-1st-edition-eri-ikeda-author/
https://textbookfull.com/product/studies-on-economic-development-
and-growth-in-selected-african-countries-1st-edition-almas-
heshmati-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-coronary-heart-disease-
pandemic-in-the-twentieth-century-emergence-and-decline-in-
advanced-countries-1st-edition-william-g-rothstein/
Cooperation and Protracted Conflict in International
Affairs Cycles of Reciprocity 1st Edition Anat Niv-
Solomon (Auth.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/cooperation-and-protracted-
conflict-in-international-affairs-cycles-of-reciprocity-1st-
edition-anat-niv-solomon-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/innovative-models-for-
sustainable-development-in-emerging-african-countries-niccolo-
aste/
https://textbookfull.com/product/renewable-energy-in-developing-
countries-local-development-and-techno-economic-aspects-hoy-yen-
chan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/synchronization-and-waves-in-
active-media-jan-frederik-totz/
Contributions to Economics
Antonio Pesce
Economic Cycles
in Emerging
and Advanced
Countries
Synchronization, International Spillovers
and the Decoupling Hypothesis
Contributions to Economics
More information about this series at
http://www.springer.com/series/1262
Antonio Pesce
Economic Cycles in
Emerging and Advanced
Countries
Synchronization, International Spillovers
and the Decoupling Hypothesis
Antonio Pesce
Milan, Italy
This monograph emerged from 4 years of doctoral studies at the Catholic Univer-
sity of Milan. Many people have helped me in various ways while I was working on
the thesis. Greatest thanks are due to Laura Barbieri, my supervisor, for her
comments, helpful advice, guidance, and continuous support. I am also grateful to
comments and discussions of seminar’s participants and professors at the Catholic
University of Milan (IT), in particular Gianluca Femminis, Domenico Delli Gatti,
Marco Lossani, Maurizio Motolese, and Lorenzo Cappellari. I would also like to
thank professors at International Center of Econometrics (CIdE), summer school
“Bayesian Methods in Economics and Finance” Bertinoro (IT), 2012. I also greatly
benefited from comments and discussions of participants at Ph.D. Conference
“International Development 2013”, University of East Anglia, Norwich (UK),
and participants at 53rd Congress of European Regional Science Association
(ERSA) at the University of Palermo (IT).
On a personal level, I owe gratitude to my relatives and a very special person,
Precious Ann, for their steady and kind encouragement.
vii
ThiS is a FM Blank Page
About the Book
ix
ThiS is a FM Blank Page
List of Abbreviations
xi
ThiS is a FM Blank Page
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Context, Rational and Objective of the Monograph . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Summary of the Chapters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2 The Decoupling of Emerging Economies, A Long-Debated Issue
but Still an Open Question: A Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Different Interpretations and Measures of Decoupling . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2.1 Interpretations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2.2 Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3 Decoupling and Globalization: Can They Coexist? . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.3.1 Increasing International Trade Linkages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.3.2 Increasing International Financial Linkages . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.3.3 Decoupling and Increasing International Linkages:
What Does Theory Say? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.4 The Long-Debated Issue: A Brief Historical Excursus . . . . . . . . . 21
2.5 Synchronization of Economic Cycles Between AEs and EEs . . . . 23
2.5.1 First Critique: Problem in Identifying Structural Breaks
Using Correlation Coefficients Over Rolling
Sub-samples of Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.5.2 Second Critique: The Correlation Coefficient
May Be Counter-Intuitive in Its Treatment of Data . . . . . . 27
2.5.3 Third Critique: Distortion Due to Heteroskedasticity . . . . . 29
2.6 Breakdown of Advanced and Emerging Countries’ Economic
Fluctuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.7 Regression Analysis and VAR Estimations of Spillover from
AEs to EEs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
xiii
xiv Contents
xv
xvi List of Figures
xvii
xviii List of Tables
Table 4.10 Dynamic impact of the credit shock spreading from the
AEs to the EEs; additional results .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . 167
Table 4.11 Dynamic impact of the real shock spreading from the
AEs to the EEs; additional results .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . 169
Chapter 1
Introduction
1
International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2013.
greater degree, which has inevitably caused stronger interdependency between the
economic cycles of EEs and AEs.
Since the question has yet to be resolved (see Kose and Prasad 2010, or Willett
et al. 2011), either in terms of economic theory, where there is no univocal
assessment on the decoupling hypothesis, or in empirical terms, I have tried to
contribute towards the ongoing debate with this essay, also in view of the consid-
erations set out below.
The question of decoupling is not only interesting from a strictly academic point
of view, but is also one that interests policymakers and economic operators owing
to the important practical/operative implications that the phenomenon may have
both when establishing national and international economic policy, and when
defining corporate strategies concerning investment diversification and risk
management.
It comes as no surprise to hear Christine Lagarde, Director of the International
Monetary Fund, underline the importance of taking both national and global
dimensions into account when establishing economic policy. In a recent speech
(23 August 2013)2 she stated that: “We need to work better together to understand
more fully the impact of these unconventional policies [the quantitative easing
adopted by the Federal Reserve Bank to manage the recent financial crisis]—local
and global. . .”.
Neither it is surprising to see major investment banks, such as Goldman Sachs
and Morgan Stanley, among the major players popularizing the idea of decoupling.
Jim O’Neill, head economist at Goldman Sachs, was one of the main advocates of
the decoupling hypothesis, in fact the subject has been debated at length outside of
academic circles as well.
Empirical analyses of decoupling have recently been performed by a number of
scholars, many of whom have focused on the development over time of the degree
of synchronization (correlation) between the economic cycles of EEs and AEs.
Writers such as Wälti (2012) and Yetman (2011a, b), for example, have focused on
the time path of the correlation between the main macroeconomic variables in EEs
and AEs. Other writers, such as Kose et al. (2008, 2012) or Flood and Rose (2010),
have firstly broken down each country’s economic fluctuations into different
components, namely the global component (common to all countries), the regional
component (common to countries located in the same geographical area), the
national component (country-specific), and what could be defined as the group
component (common to countries with the same development level); then they have
evaluated the decoupling phenomenon on the basis of the manner in which the
global and the group components has varied over time. Let me note that basically,
as Helbling et al. (2007) stated, the breakdown of national economic cycles into the
aforementioned components can be viewed as an equivalent approach to the
correlation analysis because, for example, the global component is a measure of
2
Speech on “The Global Calculus of Unconventional Monetary Policies”. Downloaded from:
http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2013/082313.htm on August 25, 2013.
1.1 Context, Rational and Objective of the Monograph 3
the extent of co-movement across national economic cycles of all countries. So, in
the end, the above mentioned authors investigated the decoupling hypothesis
through the correlation analysis.
As Forbes and Rigobon (2002) have pointed out, the changes witnessed in the
degree of synchronization of the economic cycles of different countries may be the
result of two different forces. On the one hand, there are the structural elements
which affect economic ties between different nations over the course of time; on the
other hand there are changes in the nature of the shocks that may impact economies
at different periods in history. This observation is extremely important since
decoupling pertains to the way in which economic ties between advanced and
emerging economies have changed over the course of time. It is a concept of
structural importance regardless of the nature of the shocks that may affect an
economy at various different stages in its history. The analysis of correlation,
although useful, doesn’t enable to distinguish the effects of the two forces on the
degree of synchronization of the economic cycles of different countries (Willett
et al. 2011). So despite their complexity and sophisticated methodologies, the
aforementioned approaches may not be particularly suited to an analysis of
decoupling. This is why I believe that the more appropriate approach is the one
adopted by authors such as Guimarães-Filho et al. (2008) as well as Dées and
Vansteenkiste (2007), who have tried to measure the impact of the USA’s economic
performance on the economies of given emerging countries. In particular, they have
studied decoupling by comparing the repercussions that a shock in the USA would
have had before, and after, the globalization era on the Asian emerging countries
(first paper), and on the emerging economies of Asia and Latin America (second
paper).
This essay aims to contribute towards the debate on decoupling, by addressing
the following questions.
Has the EEs’ vulnerability to external shocks (that is, shocks outside of the EEs
themselves) propagated by the AEs changed over the course of time? If so, has it
grown, or has it indeed decreased as decoupling hypothesis claims? Are EEs more
vulnerable to the real or credit shocks spreading from AEs?
With regard to the aforementioned literature, the spirit of the present study is
best reflected in the approach adopted by Guimarães-Filho et al. (2008) or by Dées
and Vansteenkiste (2007), and it aims to extend the empirical analysis of
decoupling in various different directions.
First of all, it takes into consideration the “bank lending” variable too. The
majority of empirical studies of decoupling focus on the Gross Domestic Product
(GDP), as one of the principal indices of the country’s economic performance, or
they consider, for example, some real indices such as industrial production, con-
sumption and investment, and some financial indices such as the stock-market
values. Bank lending has not been duly considered yet, despite the fact that it is
widely believed (Kose and Prasad 2010; Helbling et al. 2011) that lending can play
a fundamental role both for the economic dynamics of any country and in the
propagation of economic shocks from one country to another.
4 1 Introduction
Secondly, unlike the prevailing literature, the present study does not consider the
resilience of a small group of EEs to shocks spreading from the USA, but analyzes
the sensitivity of a large number of EEs to the dynamics of a large number of AEs.
Considering the multiplicity of economic relations between a large number of
countries is of vital importance to any analysis of the decoupling phenomenon
because one of the arguments submitted by the advocates of this hypothesis is that
the gradual strengthening of economic relations among EEs could have helped
reinforced economic ties among such economies over the course of time, thus
rendering them less vulnerable to shocks from the AEs than has been the case in
the past.
Thirdly, unlike the aforementioned studies, the present work does not evaluate
the time evolution of the EEs’ vulnerability to external shocks by comparing two
sub-periods chosen in a rather arbitrary fashion, in order to test for the existence of a
“pre-decoupling” period and a “post-decoupling” period; instead, as it will be clear
soon, this work assesses the EEs’ vulnerability in a more flexible manner. Up until
now decoupling theory has been empirically investigated by looking for some form
of structural watershed, that is, a break in the coefficients of the econometric model
identifiable at some point in the time (usually in the late 1980s, when according to
many scholars, globalization3 has become particularly evident). Such an approach
is appropriate and effective if the object of study evolves discretely over time,
namely as a break at certain point of time. However if a gradual evolution over time
is plausible, as may well be true in the case of decoupling, then it would be more
appropriate to utilize an approach (as in this work) allowing for a gradual change in
coefficients over time rather than for an abrupt break.
In order to deal with the above said three points, a Time Varying PANEL VAR
with the factorization of the coefficients (Canova and Ciccarelli 2004, 2009) has
been utilized. This econometric instrument is particularly well suited to the pursuit
of this study’s objectives, for a number of different reasons.
The first reason is that the factorization of coefficients offers two immediate
advantages: the first is that it significantly reduces the number of parameters that
have to be estimated; this reduction is extremely important when handling a large-
size PANEL model, as is the case in the present study. The second reason is that,
depending on the factorization employed, the dynamics of the dependent variables
may be interpreted as the result of various different components [as is the case in the
work by Kose et al. (2008)].
Secondly, the model used is particularly useful when investigating the interna-
tional transmission of shocks from AEs to EEs since it duly takes account of the
interdependency among countries; in other words, it allows for dynamic feedbacks
across countries and variables. This feature renders analyses more realistic for the
purposes of the evaluation of the EEs’ responses to negative scenarios in the AEs.
3
Globalization is the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international
influence or start operating on an international scale (Oxford Dictionary).
1.1 Context, Rational and Objective of the Monograph 5
shocks has changed in a non-progressive manner over the course of time, with
phases of greater vulnerability being followed by phases of lower vulnerability, and
vice versa. This “wave-like” dynamic, whose evidence has yet to be fully analyzed,
may “upset” supporters of decoupling hypothesis, who on the contrary would have
expected the economic strengthening of the EEs to have followed a progressive,
and in a certain sense “monotonic increasing” pattern.
Another interesting finding is that during almost the entire period under exam-
ination, the EEs proved more relative vulnerability to external shocks of credit
nature than to those of real nature. This greater relative vulnerability reached its
peak in the latter years of the sample period, that is during the 5 years between 2006
and 2010.
also enabled us to ascertain whether the emerging economies are more vulnerable
to real shocks or to credit shocks.
Chapter 5 concludes.
References
Canova F, Ciccarelli M (2004) Forecasting and turning point prediction in a Bayesian panel VAR
model. J Econ 120:327–359
Canova F, Ciccarelli M (2009) Estimating multicountry VAR models. Int Econ Rev 50
(3):929–959
Dées S, Vansteenkiste I (2007) The transmission of US cyclical developments to the rest of the
world. European Central Bank, working paper series no. 798
Flood R, Rose A (2010) Inflation targeting and business cycle synchronization. J Int Money Financ
29(2010):704–727
Forbes KJ, Rigobon R (2002) No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market
comovements. J Financ 57(5):2223–2261
Guimarães-Filho R, Hori M, Miniane J, N’Diaye P (2008) Can Asia decouple? Investigating
spillovers from the United States to Asia. In: Regional economic outlook. IMF, Washington
Helbling T, Berezin P, Kose MA, Kumbof M, Laxton D, Spatafore N (2007) Decoupling the train?
Spillovers and cycles in the global economy. In: Word economic outlook. International
Monetary Fund, Washington
Helbling T, Huidrom R, Kose MA, Otrok C (2011) Do credit shocks matter? A global perspective.
Eur Econ Rev 55(3):340–353
Kose AM, Prasad ES (2010) Emerging markets—resilience and growth amid global turmoil.
Brooking Institution Press, Washington, DC
Kose AM, Otrok C, Whiterman CH (2008) Understanding the evolution of world business cycles. J
Int Econ 75:110–130
Kose AM, Otrok C, Prasad ES (2012) Global business cycles: converging or decoupling? Int Econ
Rev 53(2):511–538
Lane PR, Milesi-Ferretti GM (2007) The external wealth of nations mark II. J Int Econ 73:223–250
Wälti S (2012) The myth of decoupling. Appl Econ 44(26):3407–3419
Willett TD, Liang P, Zhang N (2011) Global contagion and the decoupling debate. In: Cheung
Y-W, Kakkar V, Ma G (eds) Frontiers of economics and globalization. Emerald Group
Publishing, Bingley
Yetman J (2011a) The decoupling of Asia-Pacific? In: Cheung Y-W, Kakkar V, Ma G (eds)
Frontiers of economics and globalization. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley
Yetman J (2011b) Exporting recessions: international links and the business cycle. Econ Lett 110
(1):12–14
Chapter 2
The Decoupling of Emerging Economies,
A Long-Debated Issue but Still an Open
Question: A Survey
2.1 Introduction
Emerging economies (EEs) have progressively increased their role in the interna-
tional economic scenario, to the point that the share in the global economy of EEs
[together with Developing Economies (DEs)] has now reached 50.9 % in 2013
(it was 30.9 % in 1980).1 From an economic point of view, their importance has
grown along different dimensional paths, as mirrored by foreign direct investments
and portfolio investments, total currency reserves and, in more general terms, their
shares in international commercial and financial trade. Technological innovation
(e.g., more efficient means of transport or information communication technology),
on the one hand, and policies encouraging commercial and financial trade (reduced
customs duties or the setup of free trade areas), on the other, have lent significant
support to integrating individual countries at global level (globalization). During
the globalization period, for the EEs the trade openness ratio2 rose from 30 % to
around 80 % and more interestingly for the EEs the increase in international trade
was accompanied by a significant rise in intragroup trading, which grew from 9 %
of total foreign trade in 1960 to over 40 % in 2005 (Kose and Prasad 2010).
With this growing importance of EEs, a fierce debate has begun as to whether the
national economic cycles are converging or whether the cycles of EEs and
advanced economies (AEs) are becoming disconnected, the so-called “decoupling
of EEs from the AEs”. The convergence argument is based on the idea that all
economies have become more intertwined through trade and finance, which should
make the national economic cycles more connected. In contrast, the decoupling
argument is based on the idea that, together with the strengthening of the EEs’
1
Data refer to Gross domestic product based on Purchasing-Power-Parity (PPP) share of world
total. The source is the International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database,
April 2013.
2
Trade openness is the ratio of total trade (export plus import) to GDP.
economic bases, the recent and prominent development of real and financial
linkages among EEs may have reinforced the link between the emerging countries
to the detriment of their relationships with the AEs, which instead may have
relatively weakened.
These two opposing perspectives reflect the fact that theoretical models often
make different predictions about the effects of trade and financial integration on the
interrelationships among national economic cycles.
Trade theories imply that an increase in trade linkages leads to an increase in
intra-industry or inter-industry product specialization.3 The way in which the
increased specialization affects the degree of synchronization (comovement)
between the national economic cycles is thought to depend on the nature of
specialization (Frankel and Rose 1998). More precisely, if the industry shocks
(namely the shocks affecting a specific industrial sector) are important in driving
economic cycles, then the comovement of the economic cycles is expected to
increase when the trade linkages associated with the intra-industry specialization
increase, whereas the comovement is expected to decrease when the trade linkages
are mainly associated with inter-industry specialization. The two types of industrial
specialization are not mutually exclusive, namely in some production sectors there
may be inter-industry specialization and in some others there may be intra-industry
specialization: comparative advantages encourage inter-industry specialization,
and scale economies sustain intra-industry specialization (Krugman 1981). Thus,
in theory, the effect of the production specialization on the degree of comovement
and linkages in economic cycles is not univocal but depends on which type of
production specialization prevails.
There is not univocal theoretical predictions about the effects of financial
integration on the linkages of national economic cycles. As explained in depth by
Kose and Prasad (2010), financial integration could decrease the synchronicity of
economic cycles facilitating inter-industry production specialization through the
easy reallocation of capital, given the comparative advantage of each country. On
the other side, contagion effects, transmitted through financial linkages, could
increase synchronicity via cross-country spillovers of macroeconomic fluctuations.
The comovement of economic cycles could also be increased through demand-side
effects, as long as the financial integration determines a similar dynamic of wealth
across countries.
Many scholars investigated empirically the decoupling hypothesis, and in some
cases provided different interpretations of this phenomenon. The decoupling
implies a break in a relationship that was previously more coupled and closely
linked. The concept is not precisely defined so it allows for different readings. The
basic idea is that the economic growth of one area becomes progressively less
dependent on growth in another area (Rossi 2009). This concept has been translated
3
Inter-industry trade is the exchange of totally different products between countries. Intra-industry
trade is the two-way trade of products in the same industry classification. See Krugman (1981) for
more details.
2.1 Introduction 11
in two main different ways. Firstly, many authors speak on decoupling in terms of
decreasing comovement of economic cycles and investigate it by computing cor-
relation patterns between the economic cycles of economic variables of AEs and
EEs looking for eventual decreasing correlation path (e.g., Wälti 2012), or inves-
tigate it by dividing the sources of a country’s economic fluctuations into global,
group (namely advanced and emerging economies groups) and national factors
looking for eventual increasing importance of group factors in explaining the
economic fluctuations (e.g., Kose et al. 2008). Secondly, discussions on decoupling
frequently proceed in terms of the extent of spillover of shocks from AEs to EEs
(e.g., IMF, World Economic Outlook 2007).
From the empirical point of view, the investigation of the decoupling has been
performed with different tools, namely different statistical and econometric instru-
ments such as the correlation analysis or the VAR estimation, and with different set
of data such a synthetic indicator like the gross domestic product (GDP) or a richer
set of data like the industrial production, the export index and the unemployment
rate for example.
Despite the different investigation techniques adopted to study it and the various
way explored, the empirical literature has not yet reached a broadly accepted
conclusion. Also in the empirical economic literature, as in the economic theory,
there is still no prevalent opinion about the potential effects of the international
integration on the convergence or decoupling of EEs and AEs. The subject is still
open to debate in the academic and it kindles not only the interest of academics.
Also policymakers and practitioners are interested in the issue given the important
practical implications that decoupling could have, for example, on the definition of
national and international economic policies and on the business strategies aimed at
investment diversification and risk management.
Given the wide range of parties interested in this issue, its important implications
and the absence of a broadly accepted conclusion, it is no wonder that the
decoupling issue has been long debated. This survey aims to retrace the steps of
this debate. In particular, it intends to present the different interpretations of the
phenomenon discussed in the literature (Sect. 2.2); the different predictions of
economic theory on the issue of decoupling in the globalization era (Sect. 2.3);
how prevalent opinion among academics and leading international observers has
changed historically, with the alternating prevalence of views in support and against
decoupling (Sect. 2.4); the approaches adopted in the empiric investigation with
their respective “strengths and weaknesses” and results (Sects. 2.5–2.8). Finally,
Sect. 2.9 presents the conclusions of this chapter.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
This manner of asceticism is not particularly common nowadays,
and we need not fear that it will be too generally practiced. I am
calling attention to it in order to show that selfishness may take on
the mask of purity or of respectability, a selfishness that springs from
pure moral motives and a longing for the elevation of character.
But there is another type of respectable selfishness that is far
more common, possibly more common in America than in any other
country. It is not usually recognised as selfishness, but regarded as
one of the greatest—perhaps the greatest—of the virtues. It is seen
chiefly among earnest and ambitious young men, who assume that
life is not a holiday, but a serious affair, a struggle, a strictly
competitive race, where if you stop a moment, even for reflexion, you
are left behind.
We are bound to respect these men. They have at all events
found out half the secret of life. They have set before themselves
some goal, in politics, in business, in literature, and they are
determined to reach it. They are equally determined to gain the prize
by no dishonourable means. Their minds are full of the lessons
learned from their predecessors, men who by the sacrifice of
temporary pleasures, by the refusal to indulge in recreation or
relaxation, have surpassed their competitors and reached the top.
We are constantly told that it is only by intense concentration, by
terrific efforts day and night, and by keeping the end constantly in
view that one can attain success. Surely these young men are to be
admired, surely they are models, examples worthy of emulation?
Well, they are better than criminals, they are better than
parasites, they are better than drones. But their driving motive is
selfishness. Tennyson wrote The Palace of Art, Browning wrote
Paracelsus, because each of these poets knew that his individual
danger was not what is usually known as “temptation.” They knew
that they would never go to hell by the crowded highway of
dissipation, for they were above the mere call of the blood. Their
danger lay in a high and noble ambition, which has wrecked many
first-rate minds.
Modern life tends to encourage this respectable selfishness. The
central law of the so-called science of Economics is selfishness. A
whole science is built on one foundation—that every man in the
world will get all he can for himself. The subject is naturally studied
not from an ethical, but from a scientific standpoint. Life is a race.
Now I believe that Efficiency—mere practical success in the
world—is as false an ideal as asceticism. If the morality of
withdrawal is not good enough, neither is the morality of success.
Those deserve the highest admiration and the most profound
respect who have actually aided their human brethren, who have left
the world better than they found it.
This is by no means a hopeless ideal of character. It is not
necessary to crush a tyrant or to organise a revolution or to
reconstruct society or to be a professional reformer. There are plenty
of professional reformers who have tremendous enthusiasm for
humanity and who have never helped an individual. Those who by
unselfish lives and consideration for others elevate the tone of the
community in which they live and who by their presence make others
happier, these are the salt of the earth. Their daily existence is more
eloquent than a sermon.
American young men and women in our High Schools and
universities are not often face to face with the mystery of life. They
have no conception of the amount of suffering in the world. Their
own lives are comparatively free from it, in many cases free even
from anxiety. These boys and girls are for the most part sensible,
alert, quick-witted, and practical; what I should like to see would be a
change in their ideals from mere Success to something nobler. I
should like to see them devoting their intelligence and energy to the
alleviation of suffering and to the elevation of human thought and life.
If one still believes that the highest happiness and satisfaction
come from the attainment of any selfish ambition, no matter how
worthy in itself, it is well to remember the significance of the fact that
Goethe, acknowledged to be one of the wisest of men, made Faust
happy only when he was unselfishly interested in the welfare of
others; and to remember that Benjamin Franklin, perhaps the
shrewdest of all shrewd Americans, found the greatest pleasure of
his long life in two things—public service and individual acts of
kindness.
XX
BIRDS AND STATESMEN
I saw in a vision
The worm in the wheat
And in the shops nothing
For people to eat:
Nothing for sale in
Stupidity Street.
XXI
RUSSIA BEFORE THE REVOLUTION
The best way to invade Russia is by sea; and I advise those who
plan to visit the Soviet Republic to go via Stockholm. Copenhagen,
Christiania, Stockholm are three interesting cities and should be
seen in that order. Stockholm, the “Venice of the North,” is one of the
most beautiful, most picturesque, and most attractive places in the
world.
It is surprising that the short sea voyage from Stockholm to Saint
Petersburg (now Leningrad) is not better known; it is enchantingly
beautiful. We left Stockholm at six o’clock in the evening of a fine
September day, and as our tiny steamer drew away, the sunset light
over the fair city hung a new picture on the walls of my mind. It took
some five hours to reach the Baltic, five hours of constantly changing
scenery, one view melting into another like a succession of
dissolving panoramas. Hundreds of miniature islands dotted with
châteaux and country houses; winking lighthouse towers; “the grey
sea and the long black land.”
An impossible half-moon lent the last touch of glory to the scene.
We stood on the top deck and beheld the spacious firmament on
high, thick inlaid with patines of bright gold; while the long level light
of the crazy moon fell across the darkening water and the myriad
islands.
In the middle of the night we crossed the Baltic, and in the
whitening dawn entered the gulf of Finland. The air was nipping and
eager, but the sun rose in a cloudless sky. All day long the steamer
nosed her way through the blue sea, twisting and turning among the
countless points of the earth’s surface that were just able to keep
their heads above water. A few of these were covered with green
grass, and supported white farm buildings where laughing children
accompanied by dignified dogs ran out to see our transit; but for the
most part these elevations were bald, with a tall lighthouse as sole
decoration.
At five in the afternoon we reached Helsingfors (still my farthest
north) and stepped ashore to spend six hours in seeing the town, the
boat not proceeding toward Russia until late in the night. The
clouded sky was low and harsh the next morning, and the sea was
surly. Toward noon it cleared, and early in the afternoon we saw the
gilded domes and spires of Holy Russia. After a long delay with
passports, we drove across one of the bridges over the Neva to our
hotel at a corner of the Nevski Prospekt. Although it was only
September, the temperature was under fifty, and seemed colder.
I had a severe cold, which had its origin in a chill I had caught in
rashly touching a piece of toast that a waiter brought me in a London
hotel. But I was right in style. Accustomed as I was to see on the
streets of any American city the healthy, cheerful, well-clad and well-
shod men and women, I was appalled by the faces and the clothes
of the Russians. What they look like today I know not, but a more
unhappy looking crowd than I saw every day on the streets of
Russian cities I have never seen outside of pictures of Hell. Many of
the people had their ears and mouths bandaged and on their feet
were (if they could afford it) enormous knee-boots. All seemed to be
suffering from the foot and mouth disease.
Never shall I forget the boots and overcoats and uniforms on the
Nevski Prospekt. The question of leg-clothes would have interested
the author of Sartor Resartus. In Edinburgh all the men and some of
the women wore knickers, with stockings that seemed an inch thick.
Compared with Europeans, Americans are tropically clad. In order to
avoid the glare of publicity, I bought in Scotland a homespun golf
suit.
I tried these abbreviated trousers just once on the Nevski
Prospekt. Everybody stopped to stare. Had I worn a flowing purple
robe, I should not have attracted such attention. Military officers
gazed at me in cold amazement, as though I had leprosy; while the
more naïve passers made audible comment, which fortunately I
could not translate. Then I tried the experiment of conventional
clothing, but wore low shoes. Everyone gazed at my feet, some in
wonder, some in admiration, some in terror. I felt as I did many years
ago when I wore a striped cap in Brussels. A stranger looked at me
earnestly and then said in an almost reverent tone, and he said it
three times: Nom de Dieu!
In America our citizens show much the same interest in strange
clothing. Professor E. B. Wilson, a distinguished mathematician,
bought a suit of clothes in Paris. He wore it only once in America. A
citizen gazed at him steadfastly, and said “J——!”
The faces of the common people in Russian cities were sad to
behold, whether one saw them on the street or in church. Not only
was there no hilarity, such as one sees everywhere in American
towns; those faces indicated a total lack of illuminating intelligence.
They were blank, dull, apathetic, helpless. Gorki said that the people
in Russia had so little to look forward to that they were glad when
their own houses burned down, as it made a break in the dull routine
of life.
One afternoon I walked the entire length of the Nevski Prospekt,
no mean achievement in a heavy overcoat. I began at the banks of
the restless, blustering Neva, passed the extraordinary statue of
Peter the Great, came through the garden by the statue of Gogol,
and with the thin gold spire of the Admiralty at my back, entered the
long avenue.
I followed the immense extension of the Nevski, clear to the
cemetery, and stood reverently before the tomb of Dostoevski. Here
in January, 1881, the body of the great novelist was laid in the grave,
in the presence of forty thousand mourners.
In a corner of the enclosure I found the tomb of the composer
Chaikovski; I gazed on the last resting-place of Glinka, father of
Russian music. On account of the marshy soil, the graves are built
above instead of below the surface of the ground, exactly as they are
in New Orleans. It is in reality a city of the dead, the only place
where a Russian finds peace. I passed out on the other side of the
cemetery, walked through the grounds of the convent, and found
myself abruptly clear from the city, on the edge of a vast plain.
XXII
THE DEVIL
It is rather a pity that the Devil has vanished with Santa Claus
and other delectable myths; the universe is more theatrical with a
“personal devil” roaming at large, seeking whom he may devour. In
the book of Job the Devil played the part of the return of the native,
coming along in the best society in the cosmos to appear before the
Presence. And when he was asked where he came from, he replied
in a devilishly debonair manner, “From going to and fro in the earth,
and from walking up and down in it.”
There are so many things in this world that seem to be the
Devil’s handiwork, and there are so many people who look like the
devil, that it seems as if he could not be extinct. His chief service to
the universal scene was to keep virtue from becoming monotonous;
to warn even saints that they must mind their step; to prove that
eternal vigilance is the price of safety. The Enemy of Mankind never
took a holiday. Homer might nod, but not he. In fact, on human
holidays he was, if possible, unusually efficient. The idleness of man
was the opportunity of Satan.
The principle of evil is so active, so tireless, so penetrating that
the simplest way to account for it is to suppose that men and things
receive constantly the personal attention of the Devil. Weeds, and
not vegetables, grow naturally; illness, not health, is contagious;
children and day-labourers are not instinctively industrious;
champagne tastes better than cocoa.
Throughout the Middle Ages, although every one believed
steadfastly in the reality of the Devil and that he was the most
unscrupulous of all foes, there was a certain friendliness with him,
born, I suppose, of daily intimacy. It was like the way in which hostile
sentries will hobnob with one another, swap tobacco, etc., in the less
tense moments of war. The Devil was always just around the corner
and would be glad of an invitation to drop in.
Thus in the mediæval mystery plays, the forerunners of our
modern theatres, the Devil was always the Clown. He supplied
“comic relief” and was usually the most popular personage in the
performance. He appeared in the conventional makeup, a horrible
mask, horns, cloven hoofs and prehensile tail, with smoke issuing
from mouth, ears and posterior. He did all kinds of acrobatic feats,
and his appearance was greeted with shouts of joy. In front of that
part of the stage representing Hellmouth he was sometimes
accompanied with “damned souls,” persons wearing black tights with
yellow stripes. On an examination at Yale I set the question,
“Describe the costume of the characters in the mystery plays.” One
of the students wrote: “The damned souls wore Princeton colours.”
The modern circus clown comes straight from the Devil. When
you see him stumble and fall all over himself, whirl his cap aloft and
catch it on his head, distract the attention of the spectators away
from the gymnasts to his own antics, he is doing exactly what his
ancestor the Devil did in the mediæval plays.
It is at first thought singular that those audiences, who believed
implicitly in a literal hell of burning flame, should have taken the Devil
as the chief comic character. I suppose the only way to account for
this is to remember how essential a feature of romantic art is the
element of the grotesque, which is a mingling of horror and humour,
like our modern spook plays. If you pretend that you are a hobgoblin
and chase a child, the child will flee in real terror, but the moment
you stop, the child will say, “Do that again.”
There are many legends of compacts with the Devil, where some
individual has sold his soul to gain the whole world. The most
famous of these stories is, of course, Faust, but there are
innumerable others. Here is a story I read in an American magazine
some fifty years ago.
A man, threatened with financial ruin, was sitting in his library
when the maid brought in a visiting card and announced that a
gentleman would like to be admitted. On the card was engraved
Mr. Apollo Lyon.
As the man looked at it his eyes blurred, the two words ran
together, so they seemed to form the one word
Apollyon.
The gentleman was shown in; he was exquisitely dressed and
was evidently a suave man of the world. He proposed that the one
receiving him should have prosperity and happiness for twenty
years. Then Mr. Lyon would call again and be asked three questions.
If he failed to answer any of the three the man should keep his
wealth and prosperity. If all three were correctly answered the man
must accompany Mr. Lyon.
The terms were accepted; all went well for twenty years. At the
appointed time appeared Mr. Lyon, who had not aged in the least; he
was the same smiling, polished gentleman. He was asked a question
that had floored all the theologians. Mr. Lyon answered it without
hesitation. The second question had stumped all the philosophers,
but it had no difficulties for Mr. Lyon.
Then there was a pause, and the sweat stood out on the
questioner’s face. At that moment his wife came in from shopping.
She was rosy and cheerful. After being introduced to Mr. Lyon she
noticed her husband was nervous. He denied this, but said that he
and Mr. Lyon were playing a little game of three questions and he did
not want to lose. She asked permission to put the third question and
in desperation her husband consented. She held out her new hat
and asked: “Mr. Lyon, which is the front end of this hat?” Mr. Lyon
turned it around and around, and then with a strange exclamation
went straight through the ceiling, leaving behind him a strong smell
of sulphur.
XXIII
THE FORSYTE SAGA
Beautiful lines which show that the man who wrote them had a
clear conception of true religion are these: