Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability A Treatise For Engineers 1St Edition Subhas K Sikdar Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability A Treatise For Engineers 1St Edition Subhas K Sikdar Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/health-at-a-glance-asia-
pacific-2016-measuring-progress-towards-universal-health-
coverage-volume-2016-organization-for-economic-cooperation-and-
development/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-carbon-management-
technologies-carbon-removal-renewable-and-nuclear-energy-
volume-1-1st-edition-subhas-sikdar-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/groundwater-development-and-
management-pradip-k-sikdar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/innovation-for-sustainability-
business-transformations-towards-a-better-world-nancy-bocken/
Towards a Liberatory Epistemology Deborah K. Heikes
https://textbookfull.com/product/towards-a-liberatory-
epistemology-deborah-k-heikes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/therapeutic-progress-in-
oncology-towards-a-revolution-in-cancer-therapy-1st-edition-
jacques-barbet/
https://textbookfull.com/product/educating-science-teachers-for-
sustainability-1st-edition-susan-k-stratton/
https://textbookfull.com/product/zero-waste-management-practices-
for-environmental-sustainability-management-practices-for-
environmental-sustainability-1st-edition-ashok-k-rathoure-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/essential-quotes-for-scientists-
and-engineers-konstantin-k-likharev/
Subhas K. Sikdar · Debalina Sengupta
Rajib Mukherjee
Measuring
Progress
Towards
Sustainability
A Treatise for Engineers
Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability
Subhas K. Sikdar • Debalina Sengupta
Rajib Mukherjee
Rajib Mukherjee
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX, USA
John Browne, the former Chief Executive Officer of BP, in his book, Seven
Elements That Changed the World, quoted the Indian industrialist, Sir Jamshedji
Tata: “We do not claim to be more unselfish, more generous or more philanthropic
than other people. But we think we started on sound and straightforward business
principles, considering the interests of the shareholders our own, and the health and
welfare of the employees, the sure foundation of success.” This is a good articula-
tion of industrial sustainability. This statement dates back to the early twentieth
century, long before the ravages of industrial pollution were clearly noticed and
environmental protection became an important function of political governance. In
today’s world, where sustainability is a familiar word in political, industrial,
commercial and academic circles, Mr. Tata would surely oppose adding adverse
health impacts to the surroundings of his many manufacturing facilities and to
anyone who might come in contact with his products. This is well and good, but in
engineering an idea is only good as long as it can be tested and validated.
We have learned to accept in recent times that ideas and actions have conse-
quences, some intended and some unintended. Only when these consequences are
understood can we make an overall estimate of the usefulness of these actions. The
human mind often reasons linearly. A is done and B is observed; therefore A causes
B. Often we ignore other effects that A may have caused some may be clear but
ignored, while others may not be obvious and might even show up later. These are
the so-called known unknowns and unknown unknowns that Donald Rumsfeld
made famous. Only when we gather the information by repeating the actions and
measuring the causes and effects can we have a retrospective assessment of the
benefits and costs of an action. This is the essence of complexity. In manufacturing
we start with laboratory experiments under controlled conditions. But we still
undertake piloting and gather data on more causative variables that might affect
production, and we find variables that may become more important at larger scales
than at smaller ones before designing a manufacturing plant. For example, we
gather kinetic and mass transfer information on reactions conducted in tiny appa-
ratuses in the laboratory with larger surface to volume ratio than can be expected at
vii
viii Preface
large scales. Heat transfer information thus needs to be corrected upon scale up
because surface areas on which heat transfer depends do not scale equally with
volume. Designing processes for large-scale operations are largely based on retro-
spective design information collected at smaller scales, but design activity can be
prospective due to a lack of adequate information on some variables. This is where
modeling comes in to capture interactions among various process units. These
interactions embody complexity.
Sustainability is complex in its very nature. Three dimensions, environment,
society, and the economy have many variables that control sustainability. We have
to first accept the fact that sustainability is a comparative concept. On this basis, we
must quantitatively express the values of these variables, called indicators in this
book, in a system for which we are interested in determining relative sustainability
in reference to a known system of the same type. A fair comparison of the values of
these indicators will tell us if we have a better or worse status of the system in
sustainability terms. The basis of this book is to argue in favor of a representative
aggregating scheme for the indicators so that the comparison can be done with
single numbers versus a before and after comparison. The book was written for
engineers and scientists engaged in technology development, assessment, and
verification.
There are nine chapters in the book. Chapter 1 covers the emergence and
eventual popularization of the concept of sustainability and its relevance to tech-
nologies. Chapter 2 is about innovation as a driver of sustainable outcome of
technologies. In Chapter 3, we elaborate on the need for standards and measurement
science that provides the foundation of credibility for technologies that claim to
deliver sustainable outcomes. In Chapter 4, we present a systematic framework for
thinking about sustainability from a scientific and engineering viewpoint. Chapter 5
involves sustainability measurement for technology and business systems. We
discuss the use of currently available quantitative measurements of sustainability
for business and technology systems. In Chapter 6, we examine the simulation-
based approaches to process design and how these approaches can be used to make
definitive inferences on the comparative sustainability of processes or products.
Here we review extant approaches popular with researchers in process integration
approaches. We introduce the indicator aggregation based on Euclidean distance
and describe the features of this aggregation, called sustainability footprint. We
provide the theoretical basis for the idea of a statistical distance as a reliable
measurement for sustainability. Chapter 7 discusses quantitative decision making
based on indicator data by various statistical methods for aggregation. We consider
one example of a process system with indicator data and show how various
aggregation schemes work for helping us make assertions on comparative sustain-
ability. In this chapter, we consider published cases from global to technology
scales for delineating the utility of the statistical approach for uniquely choosing the
preferred solution among many options and provide ideas for further research. We
also offer research results that lead to ranking the indicators in terms of their
influence on sustainability footprints. Chapter 8 offers several case studies for
applying the competing aggregation methods with special emphasis on the
Preface ix
Euclidean distance method. Some problem sets have also been provided with data
for students to work on following the prescribed method of steps. The algorithms
for conducting the statistical analyses are made available on a Springer web page.
Chapter 9 is a treatise on a special topic of interest: the nexus of energy sustain-
ability, water sustainability, and energy water. This chapter is a commentary on the
complexity of the sustainability question in terms of the interdependence between
water and energy.
Special thanks are due to Ms. Sherestha Saini of Springer for encouraging the
writing of the book. The authors are also indebted to Prof. Humberto Brandi of
INMETRO, Brazil, for diligently and promptly reading all the chapters and pro-
viding valuable suggestions for each. We are particularly thankful for his help on
Chapter 3 (Engineering Sustainability, Needs for Metrology and Standards). We are
grateful to Prof. Yoram Krozer of the University of Twente in Enschede, the
Netherlands, for reading Chapter 2 on Innovation and for providing valuable
suggestions. Professor Santanu Bandyopdhayay of the Indian Institute of Technol-
ogy, Mumbai, deserves special credit for reading several chapters in the formative
stages and giving us advice on how to make the chapters student-friendly.
This book was designed to be an introductory course on sustainability for
engineers. Researchers working on engineering sustainability are likely to get
ideas for further research in quantifying sustainability for industrial systems. As
all three authors are chemical engineers, most of our examples are from chemical
enterprises but we believe that the methodologies are equally applicable to any
system for which quantitative data for indicators are available, and the choice of the
set of indicators of sustainability is comprehensive.
Subhas K. Sikdar
Debalina Sengupta
Rajib Mukherjee
Contents
1 Scientific Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Environmental Protection in the USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 Sustainable Development in the USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4 Sustainability from an Engineering Viewpoint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.5 Sustainability in Industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2 Sustainability and Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.2 Motivators of Sustainable Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.3 Drivers of Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.3.1 Human Curiosity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.3.2 Government Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.3.3 Environmental Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.3.4 Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.4 Innovation Is Not Always Benign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.5 Sustainable Products and Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.5.1 Maintaining Reputation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.5.2 Economic Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.5.3 Demand Pull (Customer Choice) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.5.4 New Technology Opportunity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.6 Process of Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.7 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3 Engineering Sustainability, Needs for Metrology
and Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
3.2 Providers of Standards and Methods of Development . . . . . . . . . . 47
xi
xii Contents
3.3 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.4 A Conceptual Standard Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
3.5 Corporate Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4 Systems, Indicators, and Sustainability Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4.2 Sustainability Concept for Science and Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . 62
4.3 Defining Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.4 Classifying Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.5 Determination of Indicator Dimensionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
4.6 Selection of Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.6.1 Regional Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.6.2 Selecting Indicators for Sustainability for
Business and Technology Scales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
4.7 Sustainability Assessment: A Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
4.8 Fraudulent Sustainability Claims and Green Washing . . . . . . . . . . 87
4.9 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
5 Sustainability Measurement for Technology and
Business Systems: Use of Currently Available Tools
for Quantification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.2 What Are Indicators and Metrics? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
5.3 Methods for Measurement of Environmental Impacts,
and Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
5.3.1 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
5.3.2 Life Cycle Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
5.4 Sustainability of Technological Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
5.4.1 AIChE Sustainability Metrics/BRIDGES
to Sustainability Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
5.4.2 Institution of Chemical Engineers (UK): IChemE
Sustainable Development Process Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
5.5 Sustainability of Business Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
5.5.1 The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI):
The Sustainability Reporting Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
5.5.2 The Dow Jones Sustainability Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
5.5.3 American Institute of Chemical Engineers:
AIChE Sustainability Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
5.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Contents xiii
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
Chapter 1
Scientific Sustainability
1.1 Introduction
The political idea of sustainable development grew in popularity in the late twen-
tieth century Europe, and thanks to the United Nations’ imprimatur, quickly
achieved global influence. The case for global sustainable development was
enshrined in the report, Our Common Future (1987)—a report of the World
Commission of Environment and Development (WCED) sponsored by the United
Nations and spearheaded by Gro Brundtland, former Prime Minister of Norway.
The report is usually referred to as the Brundtland Commission report. Sustainable
development derives its origin from the notion that accelerated depletion of natural
resources, the resultant widespread environmental degradation, and the creation of
ever wider economic gap between rich and poor resulted from industrial develop-
ment. Empirical evidence in support of this notion appeared to come from the
developing world where indeed vast masses of people were surviving with very
little. The living conditions, especially in urban areas, were unhealthy. The air in the
cities was foul, polluted by oxides of sulfur and nitrogen, ozone, carbon monoxide,
and particulates. The source waters in most countries were polluted by human
wastes and toxic industrial wastes containing simple and complex organic com-
pounds, and heavy metals. Soils in places, contaminated by both legal and illegal
dumping of toxic materials from industry, became blighted eyesores and sources of
pollution for groundwater. Unregulated mining activities created dangerous health
hazards for workers and left large swaths of landscapes scarred, destroyed biodi-
versity, and created soil and river pollution. As industrialization was spreading
across the globe, wealth generation, particularly its distribution, was perceived as
creating social inequities and unfairness, intragenerationally. Since natural
resources are finite—no more than what the Earth presently contains—industrial
development depletes these resources at a faster rate with increase of population
and the with the desire of all people to acquire better living conditions. This
resource depletion is also seen as sowing the seed for intergenerational inequities,
i.e., leaving less for the future generation to satisfy their material needs and
comforts. Thus the Brundtland Commission defined sustainable development as
“meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the future
generations to meet their own needs.” Sustainable development thus is develop-
ment that would strike a delicate balance among the three dimensions of sustain-
ability: protection of the environment, economic development, and creating societal
benefit. This balance, it is believed, can only be achieved by a combination of
1. Improving resource use efficiency.
2. Drastically reducing anthropogenic pollution.
3. Finding renewable materials for nonrenewable materials as far as practicable so
as to preserve natural resources for the future generations.
4. Curbing significantly the excessive and unnecessary consumption by the devel-
oped nations, among other policy measures.
An important landmark event, United Nations Commission on Sustainable
Development (UNCED), commonly referred to as the Earth Summit, occurred in
June, 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to promote sustainable development. A large
majority of the heads of states of the member nations were present to show support
for the idea and the creation of roadmaps for achieving sustainable development
goals. Three important documents were produced at that conference, all
non-binding.
First, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, adopted 27 prin-
ciples which endorsed the rights of nations to pursue development and protection of
the environment according the their own choices, use of the Precautionary Principle
(UNEP 1992)1 in environmental protection, reduction of wasteful production and
consumption, creation of statutes for environmental protection, prevention of
dumping hazardous wastes, reduction of poverty, protection of ecosystems, pres-
ervation of the rights of indigenous people, and public participation in development
decisions.
Second, a guidance document, Agenda 21 (1992) was released. Agenda 212
encouraged member nations to reduce poverty and income gap among citizens,
improve health conditions, protect natural resources and the environment by effi-
cient manufacture and consumption, protect forest resources and biodiversity,
empower under-represented groups such as women, children, and native
populations, and assist developing nations in improving their economic, social and
1
The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development adopted its 15th principle as follows: “In
order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States
according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of
full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to
prevent environmental degradation.” The Precautionary Principle allows measures that would
seem to prevent damage to human health and the environment when the causality between a
stressor and the impacts is plausible even in the absence of confirmed scientific evidence.
2
http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
1.1 Introduction 3
3
Eight Millennium Development Goals are (1) eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, (2) achieve
universal primary education, (3) promote gender equality, (4) reduce child mortality, (5) improve
maternal health, (6) combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases, (7) ensure environmental
sustainability, and (8) develop a global partnership for development).
4 1 Scientific Sustainability
4
Review of the Targets for the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective, http://
www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/review-of-targets-for-the-sustainable-develop
ment-goals-the-science-perspective-2015/SDG-Report.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2015.
1.2 Environmental Protection in the USA 5
(of biochemical flows) clearly pose danger. Measures must therefore be taken to
reverse the conditions, according to this study. Figure 1.1 shows the latest deter-
mination of this research group.
The sustainable development activities sponsored by the United Nations are all
being played out at the international political level. The role of science and
engineering in this context is only advisory, since the solutions are to be sought
in political accommodations among nations. Except for a small number of global
issues, such as emission of GHG, the general assumptions of environmental deg-
radation and associated societal ills do not apply to many developed nations. It has
been argued by many that industrial development is both an enemy and friend of the
environment. In the beginning of development, for an undeveloped economy, the
condition of the environment does suffer as the per capita gross domestic product
goes up, but the degradation peaks at a certain GDP and then declines. This is
known as the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) (Stern 2001) (discussed in
Chap. 2). The rationale cited for this phenomenon is that as wealth of a nation
increases it can better afford to clean up its legacy problems, and prevent the
environmental ills of industrial, agricultural, and other anthropogenic activities.
Recent developments in both China and India show that this observation is true,
though these two countries have major further improvements to achieve. In what
follows, we examine the issues of sustainable development and sustainability for
the USA in the context of what has been achieved before and after the Environ-
mental Protection Agency was established in 1970.
A remarkable book, Silent Springs by Rachel Carson (1962), was published in 1962
in the USA and over time it would have a revolutionary impact on environmental
stewardship not just in the USA but indeed all over the world. The book has a
philosophical underpinning and goes into detailed discussion on environmental and
health impacts of the use of man-made chemicals, described as “elixirs of death.”
The list of principal scientific sources used in the book is rather long, although none
of the references are actually cited in appropriate places in the text or footnoted. In
the first chapter, Carson described an idyllic countryside and then provided a
potential scenario of what could happen if these elixirs of death were not checked
or prevented from use. A part of the scenario is:
Then a strange blight crept over the area and everything began to change. Some evil spell
had settled on the community: mysterious maladies swept the flocks of chickens; the cattle
and sheep sickened and died. Everywhere was a shadow of death. The farmers spoke of
much illness among their families. In the town the doctors had become more and more
puzzled by new kinds of sickness appearing among their patients. There had been several
sudden and unexpected deaths, not only among adults but even among children who would
be stricken suddenly while at play and die within a few hours.
6 1 Scientific Sustainability
Kemira Sulfuric
Statoil Refinery
Acid Plant Sulfur Waste Heat
Greenhouses
Waste Utility
Cooling &
Water
at
He
Ste
s
Ga
te
as
am
el
W
District Heating
Fu
t
te Hea
Was
Wa
ste
H eat
Steam
Fish Farms
Fl y
As
h
Novo Nordisk
Neighboring Cement and
Treated Sludge Fertilizer Pharmaceutical
Farms Road
Plant
Aggregate
disinfecting pathogens. In 2015, the city of Toledo drinking water was found to be
contaminated by algal toxin originating in the Great Lakes, and for several days
delivery of drinking water to the inhabitants of the city was suspended, and bottled
water was provided. No one suffered health problems, and the problem simply went
away. The most recent crisis took place in early 2015 in Flint, Michigan where a
switch of source water to the polluted Flint River released dangerous levels of lead
from the pipes. The delivered water was visually muddy. The city of Flint switched
from the Detroit city water to save money. Here also bottled water was provided to
the citizens and the intake was switched back to Detroit after citizen outrage.
Human error at several levels caused this problem.
For the nation’s waterways the general standards of safety had long been fishable
and swimmable. For some time since the waterways started getting monitored, a
large fraction of rivers and lakes were judged unhealthy. This happened because of
unregulated sewer and industrial discharges into rivers and lakes. Cuyahoga River
and Lake Erie may have been extreme examples, but generally much remedial work
needed to be done all over the nation. Much progress to date has taken place as a
result of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting
process that requires wastewater treatment facilities of public or private kind to
achieve compliance with discharge regulation.5 Despite this progress, more needs
to be done to assure that the citizens can participate in recreational activities in the
nation’s waterways. In contrast to the situation in the USA, Australia, Singapore,
5
NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. http://enviroscienceinc.com/services/
environmental-compliance-services/. Accessed 27 Sept 2015.
10 1 Scientific Sustainability
Israel, Japan, and some European countries, much advancement still needs to be
done in the rest of world in installing treatment facilities to treat the wastewaters to
compliance levels, and in enforcing regulations.
Land pollution in the USA has been largely of industrial origin emanating from
dumping of hazardous wastes that adversely affect public health. The Love Canal
incident, revealed in the late seventies of the last century (Beck 1979), highlights
the gravity of land pollution. The Love Canal story can most generously be
described as a tragedy of errors. This was an abandoned canal used for legally
dumping wastes, initially by the city of Niagara Falls, the US Army, and a chemical
company called Hooker Chemical, and later exclusively by Hooker Chemical when
the dumpsite was owned by the company. Thousands of tons of toxic wastes from
chemical manufacturing in 55 gal drums were dumped in this site lined with clay
layers to a depth of about 25 ft. The covered site was then sold for $1 to the Niagara
Falls School District when there was a boom in manufacturing in the area, and
population grew. Hooker at first refused to sell this site, but later agreed to sell but
clearly warned the buyer of the nature of the site and inserted a caveat in the deed
that the seller would not be legally responsible for any negative outcomes. Despite
the warning, schools and homes were built on the site in the mid-1950s and soon
thereafter chemicals from the leaking drums started appearing in the backyards and
basements of homes, and in children’s playgrounds. Over time, people started to get
sick and babies were born with birth defects. In the 1970s, when Love Canal
became a national scandal, Hooker Chemical was owned by Occidental Petroleum
Company of Los Angeles. Though Occidental was not at fault, EPA sued the
company and extracted compensation for damage. The schools were removed and
hundreds of houses were bought by the Federal Government. As a result of this
scandal, Congress passed the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act in 1980, simply known as the Superfund legislation.
According to Superfund, pollution in abandoned sites is the responsibility of the
polluter (polluter pays principle). Even if the original polluter company is not
currently in operation, they have to pay for the site cleanup, and other damages,
if any. In instances, when no company in existence can be found to pay for
damages, Superfund program under the US EPA would take care of the cleanup.
The fund was created by taxing all corporations a fee to cover the expenses.
Superfund program maintains a list of superfund sites in the nations, called National
Priority List (NPL) and US EPA started aggressively supervising the cleaning up
operations in these listed sites. As of this writing, out of more than 1300 listed sites,
less than 400 have been cleaned up and hence de-listed. The process for cleanup is
long, legally onerous, and expensive. Though neither Hooker nor Occidental in this
landmark case of Love Canal can be said to have acted in bad faith, there have been
instances of other companies that practiced “drive by night dumping” in public
land, creating superfund problems.
1.3 Sustainable Development in the USA 11
The prescription of attitude change to include the needs of the environment and
society is obviously helpful to future development. However, the need to make
major changes in societal structure is difficult to grasp.
It was mentioned earlier that the USA passed the landmark National Environ-
mental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA’s vision statement is:
National Environmental Policy requires the federal government to use all practicable
means to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in produc-
tive harmony (NEPA 1970).
6
The uncertainty of sustainable development was expressed by Hales and Prescott-Allen in this
fashion: “Making progress toward sustainability is like going to a destination we have never before
visited, equipped with a sense of geography and the principles of navigation, but without a map or
compass.”
– Hales D and Prescott-Allen R (2002) Flying blind: assessing progress toward sustainability.
In: Esty DC, Ivanova MH (eds) Global environmental governance: options and opportunities. Yale
School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. New Haven, pp 31–52).
12 1 Scientific Sustainability
Fig. 1.5 Trend of intensity of fresh water withdrawal in the USA. Based on real (inflation-
adjusted) GDP. Data are plotted at 5-year intervals. Information on the statistical significance of
the trends in this exhibit is not currently available. For more information about uncertainty,
variability, and statistical analysis. view the technical documentation for this indicator. Data
source: USGS, 2014; Census Bureau, 2000, 2001, 2014; BEA, 2014
gone up by 200 % over the duration while the population increased by 72 % from
179 million.7 But per capita energy use has barely increased since about 1970, and
the energy use per unit GDP has actually declined by more than 50 % since 1960. It
has to be acknowledged that the USA, and the world for that matter, has been the
beneficiary of tremendous technological innovations and consequent higher standard
of living in that time duration. The energy use number per unit of GDP is a good
indicator of how energy efficient the economy has become over these last 50 years.
For fresh water withdrawal, the story is even better. Total fresh water withdrawal has
7
Report on the Environment (2014), http://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator.cfm?i
1.3 Sustainable Development in the USA 15
Fig. 1.6 US Municipal solid waste trend. Based on real (inflation-adjusted) GDP. Information on
the statistical significance of the trends in this is not presented here. For more information about
uncertainty, variability, and statistical analysis, view the technical documentation for this indica-
tor. Data source: US EPA, 2014; Census Bureau, 2000, 2001, 2011, 2014, BEA, 2014
Fig. 1.7 Cumulative GHG emissions from the USA compared to 1990 (US EPA, http://www.epa.
gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2014-Chapter-2-Trends.pdf.
Accessed 25 Jun 2015. In teragram equivalent
not increased since 1980, while both water withdrawal per capita and per unit of GDP
have gone down, the latter by more than 50 %—again signifying more water efficient
economy. The municipal solid waste, a surrogate for material utilization, overall has
increased by close to 200 %, but the per capita waste has remained steady since 1990,
but the per GDP number has decreased by more than 40 % since 1960. The progress
in all these fronts has been remarkable. Still, the US material utilization per capita is
among the highest in the world. The greenhouse gas emission story is also good,
especially in the last 17 years or so during which the total GHG emission from the
USA has declined. This is shown in Fig. 1.7.
16 1 Scientific Sustainability
Since this is a book for engineers, we need to narrow the discussion of sustainable
development and sustainability from global- and national sociopolitical objectives
down to how engineers can help in achieving sustainability goals by technical
means. These sustainability goals would have to be described in concrete terms,
i.e., they can be achieved in a prescribed time frame. We have to acknowledge that
engineering is the discipline of applying established scientific facts and principles
to produce machines, processes, products, and devices to solve problems. Engi-
neering will play its part in support of policy devised by international and national
authorities, as well as businesses and local regulatory authorities. Sustainable
development, as we have seen from Brundtland and the NRC report, is a political
idea which has a tremendous societal appeal, and over time will have significant
impact on the practice of science and engineering. The Brundtland idea of merging
environmental concerns with economic decision making translates to the design
and engineering of environmentally preferable technologies that are also socially
beneficial. The idea of “producing more with less” also is appealing from the
viewpoints of waste reduction and resource use (energy, material, water) optimi-
zation. Similarly the NRC report’s call for action of “Accelerate improvements in
the use of energy and materials” translates to dematerialization—material use
reduction to satisfy the same need or doing more with less, and decarbonizat-
ion—moving away from dependence on fossil carbon feedstocks for power gener-
ation, fuels, and consumer goods. We know that what is not measured does not get
managed. The NRC report puts great emphasis on the development of indicators
(or metrics) that will measure various important features of sustainability. In simple
engineering terms, when a system is well defined by known and measurable vari-
ables that can determine its behavior completely, engineers can devise mathemat-
ical models to predict the system behavior under conditions at which observed data
are not available. However, validation of the models is still necessary by purposeful
collection of such data. When the validation fails, it typically means some variables
have been either ignored or insufficiently approximated. Such a situation requires
reexamination and reformulation of the system understanding. Adequate confi-
dence in the predictive abilities of our models requires thorough knowledge of
the physics, chemistry, biology, material science governing such systems, and
computational power for accuracy. High-stake successful examples of such systems
are sending a man to the moon, intercepting a missile in air by another missile, deep
sea drilling of oil, and hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas from shale deposits deep
under the earth’s crust. By creating and operating prototypes or pilot plants,
engineers gather experience and confidence in predicting behaviors of systems at
larger scales of space and time. Further validation takes place at the operating scale
during plant start-up, or sending a dog in space before sending a man, or running
trials of hydraulic fracturing. Despite all these precautions, failures do take place,
such as Exxon Valdez, BP offshore drilling rig blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, the
Challenger disaster, refinery blowout in Texas, Chernobyl nuclear disaster, or
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
At this time Mr. Hay had become very proficient in Arabic, and his
family have still in their possession some examples of Arabic writing,
then beautifully executed by him in the highest style of Oriental
manuscript; and a friend, writing from London to his mother, Mrs.
Drummond Hay, says, ‘I met the other evening Mr. Burchardt Barker,
the Oriental translator to the Foreign Office; he told me that a letter
from the Sultan of Morocco had been sent home by your son, Mr.
John Hay, and that he had never seen anything more beautifully
translated by any Orientalist.’
It was either during this stay at Seville, or on a subsequent
occasion, that Mr. Hay visited the Alcazar, then in course of
restoration.
The architect was employed in reconstructing the beautiful
arabesque stucco-work on the walls, by taking moulds of the injured
portions, and, after remodelling the defaced parts, casting from these
moulds fresh plaques to replace those injured or missing.
After gazing for some time on these restorations, and vainly
endeavouring to puzzle out the Arabic inscriptions which enter so
largely into arabesque decorations, Mr. Hay asked for the architect
and inquired of him whether he was aware that he had reversed all
the inscriptions!
The poor man was horrified. He declared he would undo and
rectify his work, begging Mr. Hay, for pity’s sake, not to betray to any
one his discovery: as, if it were made known, he would be a ruined
man, and he and his children would starve. Mr. Hay having shown
him exactly what his error had been, left Seville without betraying the
architect.
In the summer of 1838 Mr. Hay made an expedition into the
interior of Morocco, of which he wrote an account entitled Western
Barbary. This little book, written with all the vigour and freshness
inspired by youth, and with a thorough knowledge of the wild people
amongst whom he travelled and whose sport he shared, was
published by Mr. Murray and attracted much attention and praise
from the press at the time.
During a visit to England in 1838, Mr. Hay made an application to
Lord Palmerston for a diplomatic appointment in the East, and in this
connection relates the following incident, which occurred after his
return to Tangier in the next year.
ALEXANDRIA. 1840.
Mr. Hay did not long remain without employment. In his Note
Book for 1840 he thus describes his entrance on the career of a
diplomatist.