You are on page 1of 4

Republic of the Philippines

MINDORO STATE UNIVERSITY – CALAPAN CITY CAMPUS


Masipit, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro

EVALUATION OF USER’S MANUAL FOR THE


ORIGAMI – INSPIRED CEILING LIGHT DIFFUSER

Name: (optional)________________________________________________
Respondents Group:
Industry Professionals ___ Light Consumer___

Direction: Kindly give your evaluation regarding its acceptability by checking ( ✓) the
appropriate column. Your suggestions and recommendations will be highly appreciated.
Please be guided by the rating scale provided. Rest assured that your response will be
treated with confidentiality.

Four – Point Likert Rating Scale, Numerical Scale, Statistical Rating and Verbal
Description

Numerical Scale Statistical Rating Verbal Description


4 3.26 – 4.00 Highly Acceptable
3 2.51 – 3.25 Moderately Acceptable
2 1.76 – 2.50 Fairly Acceptable
1 1.00 – 1.75 Poorly Acceptable
CRITERIA 4 3 2 1
(Comprehensibility) (HA) (MA) (FA) (PA)

1. The words used in the User's Manual are


easily understood by the readers.

2. The User’s Manual illustrates different


steps on how the prototype works.

3. The specification of the User’s Manual


is precisely and concisely presented.

4. The User’s Manual is well organized


and directions are easy to follow.

5. User’s Manual is chronologically


arranged in accordance with the design
of the prototype.

CRITERIA 4 3 2 1
(Functionality) (HA) (MA) (FA) (PA)

1. The User’s Manual is composed of


different operational guides,
descriptions, and labels that will engage
and helps readers to be knowledgeable.

2. The prototype's description is thoroughly


presented in the User’s Manual.

3. The proper usage guidelines of the


prototype are manifested in the User’s
Manual into a specific, measurable,
attainable, relevant, and time bound
(SMART) manner.

4. The User’s Manual has different


illustrations of the prototype which are
effectively foster learning in using the
product.

5. The guide and directions in the manual


are easily and effectively constructed
and stated.
CRITERIA 4 3 2 1
(Completeness) (HA) (MA) (FA) (PA)

1. Different information about the


prototype is presented in the User’s
Manual.

2. The directions are brief and adequate.

3. The User’s Manual has complete views


with dimensions.

4. The User’s Manual shows the


illustration and labels of the construct
prototype.

5. The User’s Manual has a complete


section that guides the users.
Comments / Suggestions
A. Comprehensibility:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
B. Functionality:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
C. Functionality:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________

You might also like