LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

INCENTIVES AWARDS

DILG MC 2016-58 : Reiterating and Supplementing DILG

MC 2008-102 dated 7 June 2008 re: the Lupong
Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards Enhanced Criteria and
Guidelines
 LEGAL BASIS
• Local Government Code of 1991 (RA
7160), Section 406(b):
DILG to provide a system of granting
economic and other incentives to Lupong
Tagapamayapa for their outstanding
contributions to attainment the
objectives of the Katarungang
Pambarangay.
 LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
INCENTIVES AWARDS
(LTIA)
The LTIA is a system of granting economic benefits and
other incentives to Lupong Tagapamayapa for their
exemplary performance in settling disputes within their
community. This is in recognition of the Lupon’s
contribution in the promotion of the Katarungang
Pambarangay (KP) as an indigenous mediation structure
capable of resolving disputes within a community, and
beyond the formal courts of justice.
 AWARDS OBJECTIVES
• Strengthen the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP) as an
indigenous conflict resolution structure at the grassroots
level

• Institutionalize a system of granting economic benefits and

other incentives to Lupong Tagapamayapa, which
demonstrate exemplary performance; and

• Generate greater awareness among, and support from, the

various sectors of Philippine Society on the KP as a potent
vehicle towards social ordering and human development
 LTIA AWARDS GUIDELINES

3 Major Criteria 4 Categories

• Efficiency in the • Highly Urbanized City

Operations of the LT • Component City
• Effectiveness in attaining • 1st-3rd class municipality
the KP Objectives • 4th-6th class municipality
• Creativity and
Resourcefulness in the
administration of KP
 EVALUATION CRITERIA
CRITERIA ASSIGNED
POINT SCORE
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 35
A. Observance of Settlement Procedures and Settlement Deadlines 15
B. Systematic Maintenance of Records 5
C. Timely Submission of Reports to Concerned Agencies 5
D. Conduct of monthly meetings exclusively on KP matters 10
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE 30
OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY (KP)
A. Quantity of settled cases against filed 10
B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 10
C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or award after the cases have been 10
settled
III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAAYAPA 25
A. Settlement Technique 5
B. Coordination with concerned agencies relating to disputes filed 5
C. Sustained information drive to promote KP 5
D. KP Training or seminar within the assessment period 10
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES 5
V. FINANCIAL OR NON – FINANCIAL SUPPORT 5
 I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS
CRITERIA POINT POINT
SCORE VALUE
A. Observance of Settlement Procedure and Settlement Deadlines 15
1.a) Proper recording of every dispute 2.5
1.b) Sending of Notices/Summons to parties within the prescribed period (within the 2.5
next working day upon receipt of complaint)
B. Systematic Maintenance of Records 5
Records of Cases
Records of Cases 2
• Manually
• Computerized

• Copies of minutes of Lupon meetings with attendance sheets and notices 1

• Copies of reports submitted to the Court and to the DILG on file 1

• All records are kept on file in a secured filing cabinet(s) 1

 I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS
CRITERIA POINT POINT
SCORE VALUE
C. Timely Submission of Reports to Concerned Agencies 5
1. To the Court:
• complete and on time = 4
• complete but not on time = 2
• incomplete and not on time = 1 4
• no submission = 0

2. To the DILG (Monthly) 1

D. Conduct of Monthly Meetings Exclusively on KP Matters   10
Notice of Meeting (To compute: Number of Notice of Meeting X 2 / 12) 2
Minutes of the Meeting (To compute: Number of reported KP meetings X 8 / 12) 8
 II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL
DISPUTES
CRITERIA POINT POINT
SCORE VALUE
A. Quantity of settled cases against filed   10
90-100% = 10
80-89% = 8
70-79% = 6
60-69% = 4
59% below = 2 10

To Compute: TotalII. number of settled cases

EFFECTIVENESS x 100 / Total
IN SECURING no. of cases filed
THE SETTLEMENT - cases outside
OF INTERPERSONAL
the jurisdiction of DISPUTE
KP OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY

B. Quality of Settlement Cases   10

• Zero case repudiated 5
• Non-recurrence of cases settled
5
 II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE
SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL
DISPUTES

CRITERIA POINT POINT

SCORE VALUE
C. At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or award after   10
the cases have been settled
80-100% (with supporting documents) = 10
70-79% (with supporting documents) = 8
60-69% (with supporting documents) = 6
50-51% (with supporting documents) = 4
49 and below (with supporting documents) = 2 10

To Compute :
Total Number of Complied Settlement or Award X 100 ÷  Total no. of cases
filed- cases outside KP jurisdiction
 III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS
OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

CRITERIA POINT POINT

SCORE VALUE
A. Settlement Technique   5
Settlement technique utilized by Lupon
• Reported more than one settlement technique = 5
• Reported one settlement technique = 3 5
• No report = 0

B. Coordination with the Concerned Agencies relating to disputes filed   5

(PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR, DENR, Office of the Prosecutor, Court, DOJ, CHR, etc.) 5
 III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS
OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA

CRITERIA POINT POINT

SCORE VALUE
C. Sustained information drive to promote Katarungang Pambarangay   5
(KP)
• IEC materials produced
2
• IEC activities conducted 2
• Innovative Campaign Strategy  1
D. KP Training or seminar within the assessment period   10
1. Conducted by the Barangay 6
2. Training conducted by government or non-government organizations 4
participated by Lupon members
 IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP
ACTIVITIES

CRITERIA POINT POINT

SCORE VALUE
AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP ACTIVITIES   5
Building structure or space 5

V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT

CRITERIA POINT POINT
SCORE VALUE
FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL SUPPORT   5
1. City, Municipal, Provincial, or NGAs 3
2. People's Organizations, NGOs or Private Sector 2
 AWARDS AND PRIZES
Presidential Trophy
National Awardee P1,000,000.00 Cash Prize to
be utilized for KP programs
Plaque of Recognition
Runner – Up Awardee P300,000 - P500,000.00
Cash Prize
Hall of Fame Awardee Presidential Trophy
(Nat’l Awardee for 3 cons yrs in same
awards category OR 5-time Nat’l Awardee Cash Prize
in the same category)
 DOCUMENTATION REPORT
REQUIREMENTS
1. LTIA Form 06 – SUMMARY OF CASES
2. LTIAF 07 – Performance Highlights (Brgy Profile and Brgy
Logo)
a) LTIAF 07-A : LIST OF CASES
b) Transmittal Letters of Reports submitted to concerned
Agencies
c) Notice of Meetings and Minutes of Lupon Meetings
d) Proof of Coordination with concerned Agencies
e) Proof of financial and non-financial support
3. LTIAF 07-B : Lupong Tapamayapa Profile
f.) Photos with caption of the ff:
2 pic - record book & sample entries in the record book
4 pics w/ caption - on-going settlement
2 pics of each:
i. Computerized records of cases
ii. Compilation of minutes of Lupon Meetings w/ attendance sheets
iii. Compilation of copies of reports submitted to Court and DILG
iv. Filing cabinet
3 pics of on-going meeting
2 pics – innovative settlement technique
2 pics – Coordination with concerned agencies re: disputes filed
2 pics w/ caption – information drive
2 pics w/ caption – trainings attended
3 pics - building structure/office for KP and Lupon concerns
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING and
ADJECTIVAL EQUIVALENT
Over All Performance Rating ADJECTIVAL RATING

95 – 100 Outstanding or Excellent

90 – 94 Very Satisfactory
85 – 89 Satisfactory
80 – 84 Fair
75 – 79 Poor
Below 75 Very Poor
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
INCENTIVES AWARDS

~ DAGHANG SALAMAT ~