You are on page 1of 16

Deflection

• Why does adding top bars reduce the


deflection so much?

• Is this realistic?

• Ieff/Igross. What is this all about and


what to use.
• Why does adding top bars reduce the deflection so much?
2
Shrinkage strain in concrete - no reo/PT

Shrinkage strain in concrete – with top reo

2
• Is this realistic?
3
C (Conc)

Neutral axis
T (PT)
T (Reo)

Beam or thick (300+) slabs section

C (Conc) Neutral axis


T (PT)
T (Reo)
Slab section
Top bar is not effective for thin slabs!

3
Slabs - check NA (ku.d) is below top bar level.

As bars get closer to NA, less strain at that level -> less effective

4
Restraint of PT elements

PT elements must be allowed to shorten to work


Ieff/Igross
6

Igross Ieff

6
7 Ieff/Igross

Uncracked at service and completely unrestrained 1.0 Cantilever?


(fully prestressed)
Judgement

Cracked at service and/or restrained 0.7

Ieff/Igross limited due to restraint +


• Shrinkage
• Creep
-> Induced tension (more cracking)

7
P/A levels
C Pj

Pu = (Conc compression)
Pj = Jacking force
Anchorage zones

Approx D
1
1

11
1
2

Tendon at the supports -> Otherwise full shear in RC

12
Losses and their implications
1
4

14
1
5
Tendon
Tension

Alternate tendons for efficiency – Symmetrical runs

15
Watch-its
1
6

Vertical Prestress not present before grouting -> Reduced shear

Cold weather vs lab environment

16

You might also like