Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented By:
Aritra Chatterjee
(07CE3111)
Hazard quantification
Dynamic & Random Input Load
Represent using Intensity Measure:
Peak Ground Acceleration
Spectral Acceleration
Reliability Analysis
Probabilities of failure
Risk Analysis
Interpreting failure probabilities
HAZARD QUANTIFICATION
Spectral Acceleration
3
2
Ground Acceleration
-1
-2
-3
-4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time Displacement versus time
0.08
0.04
Displacement
wn = 10.0862 /s 0
2 2
Sa S d 7.00m / s
-0.02
n -0.04
7 11% damping
4
6
5 3
4
2
3
2 1
1
0
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Time Period (s) Time Period (s)
Response Spectrum of Design Response Spectrum (BS
El-Centro Record EN 1998-1:2004)
HAZARD QUANTIFICATION
Response Spectra
40
11% damping
35
30 15
25
20 10
15
10 5
5
0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Time Period (s) Time Period (s)
Response Spectrum of Design Response
Bhuj Record Spectrum (IS 1893-
2002)
CODE BASED DESIGN
2 steel frame structures
Tested
against performance levels from
FEMA 273
CODE BASED DESIGN
4.0 m 4.0 m
25 kN/m 25 kN/m
4.0 m
50 kN/m 50 kN/m
4.0 m
Structure ‘A’
CODE BASED DESIGN
4.0 m 4.0 m 4.0 m
4.0 m
50 kN/m 50 kN/m 50 kN/m
4.0 m
50 kN/m 50 kN/m 50 kN/m
4.0 m
Structure ‘B’
CODE BASED DESIGN(1):
BS EN 1998-1:2004
• Design Base Shear : Vb Sd (Tn )m
m: Seismic mass of the frame
l: Parameter accounting for higher modes of
vibration, (1.0 for dominant first mode)
Sd(Tn): Ordinate of response spectrum at
time perion Tn
3/4
Tn Ct H
• Tn for height H:
dr:
Design inter-storey drift obtained
n: Importance factor (0.5 for Class 2 --
ordinary structures)
P d
tot r 0.1
• Ignore second order effects if: Vtot h
CODE BASED DESIGN(1):
BS EN 1998-1:2004
• Parameters :
S: 1.15 Determined by ground type alone
TB: 0.2
TC: 0.6 Mumbai assumed to have Type ‘C’
ground type
TD: 2.0
5
Spectral Acceleration (m/s/s)
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Time Period (s)
Vbsimi
Fi
s jmj
si : Displacement coordinate of i th floor in fundamental shape
mi : Seismic mass of ith floor
CODE BASED DESIGN(1):
IS 1893-2002
• Design Base Shear : Vb Ah w
• Ah (Horizontal acceleration
ZISa
response spectrum factor): Ah
2 Rg
Z: Zone factor (0.16 for moderate zone (Mumbai))
I: Importance factor (1.0)
R: Response Reduction Factor (5.0 for steel MRF)
Sa: Ordinate of response spectrum at time period Tn
Vbhi2mi
• Distribute lateral forces as: Fi
hi2m j
hi : Height of i th floor
mi : Seimic mass of i th floor
CODE BASED DESIGN(1):
IS 1893-2002
• Function of Tn alone and independent of seismic hazard in an area
25
Spectral Acceleration (m/s/s)
20
15
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Time period (s)
BS Limit State
BS Limit State
Frame IS Code BS Limit State 1
2 3
Columns: ISMC
Columns: Columns: ISMC
Columns: ISMB 300
ISMB 200 300
1 250 Beam: ISMB
Beam: ISMB Beam: ISMC
Beam: ISMB 250 350
200 300
Columns: ISMC
Columns: Columns: ISMC
Columns: ISMB 400
ISMB 250 350
2 300 Beam: ISMB
Beam: ISMB Beam: ISMB
Beam: ISMB 300 400
300 350
STRUCTURAL MODEL
Semi rigid connections
(initially developed by Hasan et al (16), adapted from Au et al(17))
Transition
from linear to non-linear
regime modeled with bi-linear curve
STRUCTURAL MODEL
Overall Stiffness Matrix
K semirigid Ke Se K g S g K ge
Ke : Constitutive Stiffness Matrix
K g : Geometric Stiffness Matrix
Se : Correction Matrix for K e
e11 0 0 0 0 0 1
pi
0 e22 e23 0 0 0 1 3EI / (LdM i / dip )
1
0 e32 e33 0 0 0
Se
4 p1 p2 0
0 0 e44 0 0 pi 1 (Elastic)
0 0 0 0 e55 e56 pi 0 (Fully plastic)
0 0 0 0 e65 e66
STRUCTURAL MODEL
External Stiffness Matrices (corrects internal
forces arising due to rigid body motions)
M1 M 2 M M
0 0 0 1 2 2 0
L2 L
M1 M 2 P M1 M 2
P
0 0
L2 L L2 L
K ge
0 0 0 0 0 0
M M M1 M 2
0 1 2 2 0 0 0
L L2
M1 M 2 M1 M 2
P 0 P 0
L2 L L2 L
0 0 0 0 0 0
TYPICAL RESPONSES
Earthquake versus time
1.5 0.25
D is p la c e m e n t ( m )
0.2
1
Ground Acceleration (m/s/s)
0.15
0.5
0.1
0
0.05
-0.5 0
-0.05
-1
-0.1
-1.5
-0.15
-2 -0.2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Time (s) Time (s)
1.5 T o p S to re y D is p la c e m e n t (m ) 0.1
1
0.05
0.5
0
Ground Acceleration
0
-0.05
-0.5
-0.1
-1
-0.15
-1.5
-0.2
-2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (s)
PERFORMANCE LEVELS
Structural Capacity
Limit State
(in terms of IDR)
Immediate Occupancy
0.7%
(IO)
Life Safety (LS) 2.5%
Collapse Prevention
5%
(CP)
Source of hazard levels: The Working Committee of Experts constituted by the National Disaster Management Authority,
Govt. of India: “Development of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of India, Final Report) (2010)(Reference 12)
PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT
Frame Hazard Level Peak Transient IDR
El Centro: 0.76%
Washington:0.86%
BS 2X2 LS 3 2% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.19g) Los Angeles:0.74%
Bhuj: 0.81%
Koyna:0.89%
El Centro: 1.8%
Washington: 1.52%
BS 2X2 LS 1 2% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.19g) Los Angeles: 1.43%
Bhuj: 1.6%
Koyna: 2.18%
El Centro: 0.36%
Washington: 0.41%
BS 2X2 LS 3 10% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.09g) Los Angeles: 0.35%
Bhuj: 0.38%
Koyna:0.42%
El Centro: 0.85%
Washington: 0.72%
BS 2X2 LS 1 10% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.09g) Los Angeles: 0.68%
Bhuj: 0.76%
Koyna: 1.03%
PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT
Frame Hazard Level Peak Transient IDR
El Centro: 0.42%
Washington: 0.43%
BS 3X3 LS 3 2% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.19g) Los Angeles: 0.43%
Bhuj: 0.6%
Koyna: 0.46%
El Centro: 1%
Washington:0.91%
BS 3X3 LS 1 2% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.19g) Los Angeles: 0.88%
Bhuj: 1%
Koyna: 0.94%
El Centro: 0.2%
Washington: 0.2%
BS 3X3 LS 3 10% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.09g) Los Angeles: 0.2%
Bhuj: 0.28%
Koyna: 0.22%
El Centro: 0.48%
Washington: 0.43%
BS 3X3 LS 1 10% in 50 yrs (Sa=0.09g) Los Angeles: 0.42%
Bhuj: 0.48%
Koyna:0.45%
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
Load Modeling:
k0 1.032e5
k 2.208
Washington 1.51e-4
Bhuj 2.44e-4
Washington 4.2e-5
Bhuj 5.05e-5
30
UPDATED RISK DIAGRAM
10 -3
2 wheelers(India)
Annual
Cars(USA)
Commercial flying
Terrorism (India) Floods (India)
Lightning
10-5 strike Lightning+Storms+Floods(USA)
(India) Lightning strike (USA)
10-6
10-1
SOCIETAL RISK
Smoking (all ages/USA)
Acceptable Risk (Partial Exposure)
Smoking (all 10
-2
ages/India)