Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6
6
2010
: -:
: :
)(.
.
.
.
(1).
(2).
).
(3
(4).
(5).
(6).
%30
%35 %15 %21
%58 %27 (7).%41
%14
%80
1990 .
(8).
%28
) ((9).
).
(10
).
(11
2006 ) (%25 1997
.%3.8
%99
(12).
(13).
(14).
(15).
(16).
(17).
)(
(18).
(19).
%42 1980 %60 1992 %62
1999 %43 %27
%19 %8
1991 Supreme court .
1999 %97
%62
.
16.000 1997 12510 ) (2007
%16 2007 %17 2004 2008
) (13.867 %15.9(20).
( Ameri aaln Asso ciation of university wome).
2002 18-11 %83
%78 %38
%36
(21).
2006 %62
%61
%80 %39 (22).
2008
(23).
11-3
(24).
%83
%27
.
%44.6 %13.8
%21.1
%22.7
(25).
1012 832
1424 892 104
(26).
2006 20
2500
1049
%37.4 (27).
%90
.
%65
%15
%20
%70
.
%10
.
%50
%20 %10
%90 %80
(28).
.
(29).
(30).
(31).
.
(32).
:
-1 .
-2
.
-3
(33).
.
:
-
.
-
:
-
:
-7 )Walter. W. Hu : (40
)
.
.
-
-17 )Virginia s. dahinten 2001 ( 50
10
:
11
:
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4 .
-5
.
-6
.
-7
.
-8
.
-9
.
-10
.
-11
.
-12
.
-13
.
.
.
12
.
.
: :
:
:
-1
.
-2 .
-3
.
-4 .
-5 .
-6
.
-:
: :
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
13
:
:
: :
.
:
.
:
-1
.
-2 .
-3
.
-4 .
-5 .
: :
"
).(64
"
").(65
"
).(66
2006
:
"
".
3
).(67
: -:
-1 -:
14
)
( )
().(68
-2 -:
)
(.
-3 ).(69
: -:
) (1 -:
:
"
.
) (2 -:
).(70
) (3 .
) (4 .
) (5 .
) (6 .
) (7 .
) (8 .
) (9 .
) (10 .
) (11 .
) (12
.
) (13
).(71
: -:
-1 :
.
)
15
(
.
).(72
-2 -:
).(73
) .(74
.
).(75
.
).(76
-3 -:
.
-: .
16
).(77
-4 -:
.
-5 -:
)
(
)
( ).(78
.
- -:
.
).(79
17
.. "" " "
).(80
:
)( : .
)( :
.
)( :
) (81
).(82
-: -:
-:
-1 -: -:
- ) (.
-
.
- .
-
.
)(83
.
-
-2 : -:
- .
- .
-
-
.
: .
.
.
18
. ).(84
"
)(85
.
). (86
:
.
:
-1 .
-2 .
-3 .
-4 .
: -:
)(87
:
-5 .
-1
-6 .
-2 .
-7 .
-3
-4 .
)(88
:
- -:
. . . . - :
. . . . . . . - .
-:
19
* - .
* -
.(89) :
* :
.....
20
* -:
.
* :
: :
-1 .(90) -:
.
.
).(91
-2 :
.
.
306
"
.
).(92
-3 ).(93
-:
21
.
. " "
.
. .
:
.
).(94
22
-: (95):
-1 -:
-:
45
.
- :
-:
).(96
-2 :
- :
)
.(97
23
- :
). (98
- -:
"
..".
: :
) ( ). (99
-1 .
-2 .
-3
.
-4 .
-5 .
-6 .
-7 .
-8 .
-9 .
-10 .
: :
" "
.
).(100
%30
24
%60
).(101
:
-1 :
" ".
-2 :
.
)(102
.
: )-:(103
-1
.
-2
.
-3 .
-4
.
-5
.
-6
.
-7
.
-8 .
-9
.
-: :
-:
-1 ).(104
-:
- .
- .
- .
- .
-
.
- .
25
- .
- .
-
.
-
.
-
.
-2 :
.....
).(105
:
. .
.
).(106
).(107
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
.
.
.
.
.
.
26
-7
.
-8
.
: -:
-1 -:
.
-2 -:
- .
-
:
:
.
: :
:
:
) (12.
: )(9
.
:
) (10.
: )
(6.
: )
(8.
: ) ( 15.
:
- ) (78
.
-
) (18
) (%80
.
-
) ( ) -3
(21
27
- :
) (
) (15
.
)(1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
.
-3 :
- :
) (3510 2010 /2009
) (351 ) (%10
).(2
87.28
84.85
87.88
91.52
87.85
83.78
87.19
93.42
92.11
93.74
95.66
93.72
91.53
93.38
)(2
2010 /2009
28
20
74
79
7
0
18
12
10
15
13
22
351
47
0
47
19
6
74
1
66
793
7
4
18
5
91
67
90
11
6
10
3
15
4
19
12
8
21
7
351
0
* .
- :
- :
2010.
: :
)(3
= 351
1
76.35
268
20
2
23.65
83
20
100%
351
) (3
) 20 ( ) (76.35
) 20 ( ) (%23.65
.
)(4
) =
( 351
314
37
-
29
%
1 89.46
2 10.54
-
100
- 100%
) (4
) (%89.46
) ( %10.54 |
.
)(5
) = ( 351
105
246
351
%
2 29.91
1 70.08
- 100%
) ( ) (%70.08 ) (
) ( 29.91
) (
) (
)(6
) = ( 351
55
179
33
4
351
%
15.67
50.99
9.40
1.14
100
2
1
3
4
-
) ( ) (%50.99 ) (%15.67 )
( ) (9.40 ) (1.14
.
)(7
) = ( 351
2
25.35
89
30
262
351
74.65
100%
1
-
) (7
) ( ) (%74.65 ) ( ) (%25.35
)
(.
)(8
) = ( 351
210
35
39
67
351
%
59.83
9.97
11.1
19.09
100%
1
4
3
2
-
) (8 ) (
) ( ) (%59.83 ) ( ) (%19.9
( ) ( %11.11 )( ) (%9.97
.
31
)(9
) = ( 351
1 27.35
96
5 12.53
44
2 21.36
75
4 14.25
50
3 17.66
62
6
6.85
24
- 100%
351
) ( ) (%27.35 ) (%21.36
) (%17.66 ) (%14.25
) (%12.53 )(%6.85
.
)(10
) = ( 351
153
67
78
26
23
4
351
%
43.59
19.08
22.22
7.42
6.55
1.14
100%
1
3
2
4
5
6
-
) (10
) ( ) (%43.59 ) ( )
( 22.22 ) (%19.08 )
(%7.42 ) ) ( %6.55 ) (%1.14
.
.
)(11
) = ( 351
500 -300
700 -500
48
137
32
%
4 13.67
1 39.03
900 - -700
900
110
56
351
2 31.34
3 15.96
- 100%
) (11
) 700 500 ( ) (%39.03 )
900 -700 ( ) (%31.34 )900 ( ) (% 15.96
) 500- 300 ( ) ( %13.67
)
(
.
)(12
) = ( 351
3 16.24
57
5 -3
2 32.19
113
7 -5
1 37.61
132
9 -7
4 13.96
49
9
- 100%
351
) (12
) 9-7 ( ) (%37.61
) 7-5( ) (%32.19 ) 5-3( ) (% 16.24
) 9 ( ) (%13.96
.
) (13 ) = ( 351
) (
33
227
248
198
176
136
85
46
37
54
15
63
38
64.67
70.65
56.41
50.14
38.75
24.22
13.11
10.54
15.38
4.27
17.95
10.83
2
1
3
4
5
6
9
11
8
12
7
10
) (13
) (%70.65 )
64(.
) (67% ) ( ) (%56.41 )
(%50.14 ) ( ) (%38.75
) (%24.22 ) (%17.95
) (% 15.38 )
(%13.11 ) (%10.83
) (% 10.83 ) (%10.54
) .(%4.27
) (
.
)(14
) ) = ( 351
2
39.32
138
1
56.41
198
3
38.18
134
5
23.93
84
6
22.22
78
4
31.62
111
7
20.80
73
) ( ) (%56.41
) (%39.32 )
(%38.18 ) % 31.62
) (%23.93 ) ( %22.22 )
( ) ( %20.80
)(
2007
.
) (113) ( Martin L . Jennifer 2005
) (114) ( Jo Celyn Handy 2006
.
34
)(15
) (15
) (726.25
).(68.97
) ( ) ( 34.80 )
( ) ( 37.30 )( ). ( 27.90
:
-1 ) (6 ) (
) (308.33 ). ( 87.84
-2 ) (4 ) (
) (306.67 ). ( 87.37
-3 ) (12 ) (
) (270.67 ). ( 77.11
-4 ) (2 ) (
) (253.33 ).( 72.17
-5 ) (5 ) (
) (242 ).( 68.94
-6 ) (9 ) (
) (241 ).(%68.7
-7 ) (7 ) (
) (235.33 ).( 67.04
-8 ) (1 ) (
) (227.67 ).( 64.86
-9 ) (11 ) (
) (212.67 ).( 60.58
) (8 ) (
-10
) (214 ).( 60.96
) (1 ) (
-11
) (204.67 ). ( 58.31
) (3 ) (
-12
) (188.67 ).( 53.75
) (108) (Potts l.Tond 2001 )Walter
(w.Hudson 2003 ) (109 ) (110) ( Anne S . Lacasse 2004
.
35
16
) (16
) (854.88 ) (%81.19 )(
) (%57.58 ) (%28.40 )(
).(%14.02
:
-1 ) (4 ) (
) (306.67 )(%87.37
-2 ) (5 ) (
) (304.23 ).(%86.70
-3 ) (1 ) (
) (300 ).(%85.47
-4 ) (2 ) (
) (292.67 ).(%83.38
-5 ) (6 ) (
) (284.33 ).(%81.01
-6 ) (3 ) (
) (277.33 ). (%79.01
-7 ) (7 ) (
) (277.67 ).(%79.11
-8 ) (8 ) (
) (268.33 ).(%76.45
-9 ) (9 ) (
) (253.33 ).(%72.17
36
-1 ) (8 ) (
) (306.67 ).(%87.37
-2 ) (1 ) (
) (317 ).(%90.31
-3 ) (2 ) (
) (307.67 ).(%85.47
-4 ) (9 ) (
) (293 ).(%83.47
-5 ) (7 )
( ) (10 )
( ) (280 )
.(%79.77
-6 ) (5 )
( ) (266 ). (%85.78
-7 ) (3 ) (
) (264.33 ).(%75.30
-8 ) (6 )
( ) (249.33 )
.(%71.10
-9 ) (4 ) (
) (242.33 ).(%69.04
)( 113
.
18
) (18
) (890.33 ) (%84.55
)( ) (%65.05 ) ( )
(%23.55 ) ( ). (%11.40
:
-1 ) (4 ) (
) (316 ). (%90.03
-2 ) (6 ) (
) (308.67 ). (%87.94
-3 ) (5 ) (
) (307.67 ). (%87.65
37
-4 ) (2 ) (
) (292.67 ). (%83.38
-5 ) (3 ) (
) (288.67 ). (%82.24
-6 ) (1 ) (
) (267 ). (%76.7
.
) (115) ( Ganga V Asiri 2008
.
38
19
) (19
) (842.38 ). (%79.99
) (%282.33
) (%32.17 ). (%12.86
:
-1 ) (4 )
( ) (315.67
). (%89.93
-2 ) (6 ) (
) (304.33 ). (%76.70
-3 ) (8 ) (
) (282.33 ). (%80.44
-4 ) (5 )
( ) (276.33 )
. (%78.72
-5 ) (7 ) (
) (274 ). (%78.06
-6 ) (3 ) (
) (271.67 ). (%77.40
-7 ) (1 ) (
) (181 ). (%51.57
-8 ) (2 )
( ) (261.33 )
.(%74.45
.
39
20
) (20
) (964.00 ) .(%55.91
)( ) (%80. 64 ) ( )(%13.35
) ( ) (%6.01
:
-1 ) (13 )
( ) (338.33
). ( %39.96
-2 ) (3 )
( ) (337.33 )( %96. 11
-3 ) (15 )
( )
(337 ). ( %96.01
-4 ) (9 ) (
) (335.67 ) . (%95.63
-5 ) (7 )
( ) (332.67 ).78
.( %94
-6 ) (1 ) (
) (332.33 ) .(%94.68
-7 ) (8 ) (
) (330.33 ) .(%94.11
-8 ) (6 ) (
) (327.67 ). (%93.35
-9 ) (10 )
( ) (326 ). (%92.88
-10 ) (2 ) (
) (325 ).(%92.59
-11 ) (4 )
( ) (316.67
) . (%90.22
40
-12 ) (11 ) (
) (307.67 ) . (%87 .65
-13 ) (5 )
( ) (292 )
.( %83.19
-14 ) (12 )
( ) (291 .67 )
.(%83.09
-15 ) (14 )
( ) (289.67
)(%82.53
) (116)( Rohi Stiller 2001
.
) (117)( Dana A Hystock 2006
) (118)( 2008
.
-:
:
- -:
) (14-3 :
-1 ) 20( )
( %76.35 ) 20 ( ) (%23.65
.
-2 ) ( )
(%98.46 ) (%10.45
.
-3 )( ) 0.8
(%70 )( ) (%29.91
.
-4 )
( ) (%50.99 ) (%15.67
41
) ( %9.40 ) (%1.14
.
-5 )
(65.74 ) (%25.35
) (.
-6 )
(%59 .83 ) (%19.9 ) (
) (%11.11 )( ) (%9.97
.
-7
)( ) (%27 ,35 ) ( ) (%21.36
) ( ) (%66.17
.
-8
) ( ) (%43 ,59 ) ( ) (%22 ,22
) ( ) (%19.08
.
.
-9
) 700-500( ) ( 39.03 ) 900-700(
) (%31 ,34 ) 900 ( )( %15 .96
)500-300( ) (%13 ,67
.
) 9-7( ) (%37 ,61 ) (7-5 ) ,19
(%32 ) (5-3 ) (%16 ,24 )( 9
-10 ( ) (%13 ,96
.
-11
) (%70 ,65 ) (%64 .67
) (%65 ,41 )
(%50 .14 )
( ) (%4 ,27 ) (
42
) (105 ,54
.
-12
) (%56 ,41 ) .32
(%39 ) ( ) (%38 .18
.
- :
-1
.
:
. . . . . . . . . -2 :
:
. . . . . . . . . : :
:
. . . - .
43
. . . . . -4 :
:
:
. . . . . . -5
:
:
. . . . . . -6
:
-
44
: .
-1 .
-2
-3
-4 ) (
: :
:
:
-1
.
-2
-3
.
-4 .
-5
.
:
-:
-1 :
.
.
.
-2
.
- :
45
) ( .
.
-2 :
.
-:
" "
.
:
- :
:
. .
. .
.
. . . -
:
.
-:
. - .
46
.
:
-1
.
-2
.
-3 .
-4
.
-5 .
-6 .
-7
.
:
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
( 2
:
-
:
) ( .
47
.
.
) ( .
( :
.
.
. .
:
.
.
.
.
.
-3
:
- :
.
.
48
- :
- :
-
49
50
23- John F.Till: Sexual Harassment, Areport on the sexual Harassment of students
,Washington,DC:Wational Advisory Council on women s Educational
Programs, 2009,pp 78-83.
24- Ellen R.Wagner : Sexual Harassment in the work plase :How to prevent
Investigate , and Resolve . problems in your organization .New yourk,
Amacom , 2009,pp144-147.
25- http:// nesassg. Org / indexz. Php? Option=com-content & task id= 8338& itemid=
97&pop.
26- http://www.annabaa.org / ntanew/651138.htm.
27- http://www. Bahzani.net/services/forum/show thread.php?t=43875.
28- http://www.afaq n.net/ show thread. Php?t= 14863.
29- Liesl Nydegger & Kelsey A.Dicker: International perspectives on sexual
Harassment of silence .New York , Academy of Siences ,2006,pp 192199.
30- Tracey P.Koehlmoos :Homeless in Dhaka: Violence, sexual Harassment , and Drag
abuse .Disease Researsh, Bangladesh- International Centre for
Diarrhoeal,2009,pp314-321.
31- Taglor G.Francies : Trapped in Circle of threats : Violence Againts Sex Workers in
Thailand , Bangkokk, Health care for women International ,2009,pp .249253.
32- Vijaya& Z.Kumer: Sexual Harassment at work plase: Ascar on Humanity,
Hyderabad, the Icfai university Journal of Employment Law , vol
(VII) .NO(1), 2009.pp. 81-83.
33- Peter bailey: Recent Development in Sexual Harassment Law : Towards Anew
Model, the Human Australia and Internationally , volume (14) NO(3) ,pp.
190-192.
34- Roni Stiller: Sexual Harassment and disordered eating symptomatology in
females : objectification , silencing ,and symbolic expression of self,
PHD,Georgia university ,2001.
51
35- Potts L.Tonda : Beyond Kiss and tell:Elementary principals Responses to peer
(student- on- student) Sexual Harassment in schools , PHD , university
of Colorado at Denver ,2001.
36- Dana A.Hysock : Fun between Friends ? How peer culture influences Adolescent s
interpretation of and Responses to peer Sexual Harassment in high
school, PHD, university, of Delaware ,2001.
37- Vincent N.Parrillo: Contery social problems ,PHD, university of Boston ,2002.
38- Gila Bronner et.al .al, Sexual Harassment of Nurses and Nursing students ,
Jouranal of Advanced Nursing ,VOL (42) .NO (6) , 2002.
39- Fineran L.Bergman : Dating Violence Among high school student ,social work, the
AAUW survey on Sexual Harassment in America s school, PHD
,Washigton , university ,2003.
40- Walter W.Hudson : Sexual Harassment of social work students Ahilia Jouranal of
women and social work, Jouranal of Vocational Behavior , Vol
(4),NO(7) ,2003.
41- Bellw .Dziech :The lecherous professor :Gender Differences of psychological
Abuse in high school dating Relationships child & Adolescent social
work ,Journal (12).Vol (3) ,NO (6),2004.
42- Loren E.Mcmaster : The Rol of Harassment Supporting attitudes , aggressive
behaviours ,and peer context in adolescent Sexual Harassment
:Adevelopmental Contexual approach , PHD ,yourk university ,2004.
43- Anne S.Lacasse : Peer Sexual Harassment among Adolescents :Adevelopment al
perspective, proguest Dissertations AND theses ,PHD,MCGILL
University ,2004.
44- Link M.Denise : Building asocial Identity :peer to- peer Sexual Harassment in
adolescents , PHD,Widener university School of Nursing ,2004.
45- Martin L.Jennifer :Peer Sexual Harassment :Finding voice ,changing culture
,PHD,Oakland University ,2005 .
52
46-Lauren F.Lichty : Being atarget and awitness :Exploring Middle School Student s
Sexual Harassment experiences, PHD, Michigan state university ,2005.
47- Danan A.Hysock :Fun between Friends?How peer culture in fluences adole
scents , Interpretations of and Responses to peer Sexual Harassment in
high school ,PHD,University of Delaware ,2006.
48- Kristen L.Michelle : Under standing Gender and Sexual Harassment in the
clementary school Context ,PHD , Michigan State University,2008.
49-Susan Z.Fineran: The Impact of Bullying and High School Girls , PHD, University
of Michigan- Dearborn,2009.
50- Virginia S.Dahinten: Peer Sexual Harassment Asocial Deteminant of Adolescent
Health ? PHD,the university of British Columbia, 2001.
51- Colleen P.Patricia : Adolescents Perception of peer Sexual Harassment in school
.PHD,Fordham university ,2001.
52- Hales M.Karen: Making Gender and Sexuality :Gender difference discursive
practices at play inpeer Sexual Harassment ,case stydy of amiddle
school ,PHD, Washington , university,2002.
53- Goebel S.Elizabeth : School peer university and teen dating Violence , what's the
difference? PHD,the university of Arizond,2003.
54- Lacey D.Wilma :Adolescent peer Sexual Harassment , Adiscursive approach,
PHD, university of Calgary ,2003.
55- Michelle B.Greenwald : Peer Sexual Harassment across the Midde school
years:Adevelopmental view of Vulnerability .PHD.Columbia University ,
2004.
56- Jocelyn Handy : Sexual Harassment in small-Town ,New Zealand :Aaulitative
study of three Contrasting Organizations, Gender ,Work and
Organization,Vol (13) NO(1), January,2006.
57- Sarae . Goldstein :Risk factors of African American and European American
Adolescents ,PHD, University of Michigan,2007.
53
: -58
.
59- Juliette C.Reder Storff , Nicole T. Sett les:
The moderating Roles of Race and Geder role Attitudes in the Re 12tion ship
Between sexual Harassment and psychological well-Being , PH.D., Michian
state university , 2007 .
60- :
2008 .
61- Ganga ViJayasiri Reporting sexual Harassment : The Importance Of
Organizational Culture and Trust , PH.D., Department of Sociology ,
university of Illinois, 2008
62- Mickson H.Kayuni : The ehallenge of studying Sexual Harassment in higher
Education : AN Experince From the university of malawies Chancelles
College, Journal of Interational Womens stadies , vol (11) No (2) ,
November , 2009 .
63- Shannon A.Glenn , Sandra EByers : the roles of situational factors attributions ,
and guilt in the well being of women who have experienced sexual
Coercion , the Canadian Journal of Humadn sexuality vol (18) (4), 2009
64- http://www.aihr.arg . th /Arabic/ work shod / lesson sounichal .htm
:
. 2002
. 2002
.
:
. 2002
69- http://www.aihr .org Tn/tadril/ work shop /lessou , sounmichal . htm
:
. 32-30 1999
71- Rlwatan voice .com /Arabic / pupit. Php?go= show, id = 102517 .
:
. 15 2003
54
-65
-66
-67
-68
-70
-72
. 3 -73
74- Copy Right : Dspace Faaulty of computer science and information technology
university of malazya , ds .pace@um is powred by mit HawlettPackard more information and software credits . feed back.
75 http ://eipr.org/report/2010/03/14/820/82.
, -: -76
.33 2010
-: -77
.34-33
.143 -: -78
-: -79
.35 1998
-: -80
.50 1998
.39 -: -81
.53 -: 82
83- http://loofm6.com/vb/show thread php?t=78883 zmgl4.com
84Baugh z. masti: On the persis tence of sexual harassment in the work place
journalist of business ethics , vol 16. no.1997,p899.
85- kiely z,henbest.m.Ssexual harassment at work: experiences from in oil refinery,
women in management review, vol (15) no(2) 2000,pp.65-66.
86- Nicole T. Buchanan: Subset comparison between sexual harassment black women
and white military rank ,psychology of women qudrterly,
Washington,2008,p378.
87- Mast N. the world according to men it is hierarchical and stereotypical, jornanal
of research ,dec,2005,pp.1-3.
88- Julitte R.nicole ,isist.HK:- The moderating .roles of race andgender- role attitudes
in the relationship between sexual harassment and psychological well
being ,psychology of women quarterly ,2007,p.31-50.
89) Rose K.: Zero Torler ance for sexual harassment by supervisors in the work place:
employers don't have areal choice, journal of forensic psychology
practice, vol (4), 2004.
90) Juliette R. : Nicole ,Isis H.K :op.cit, pp.55.
91) http:// Translate. Googleuser cont.com Translate c? h1= ar,langpair = en% 7 CAR
U=HTTP: 14/03/2010.
55
56
57
58
. /
2010
59
*
1
2
-
: -:
...................................................................... :
)(
.......................................................................:
........................................................:
-3 -:
)
-4 -:
-5 :
-
-
-
-6
)
-
-7 -:
-
-
-
-
-
-8 -:
)
60
-
-
-9 -:
)
-
-
-
-10
-
-
)
)
-:
)
- 300
500
)
- 700
900
- )
)
-
(
(
700 -500
900 - )
-11 -:
5 - 3 )
-
9 - 7
(
(
- 5
7
(
)
- 9
-12 :
(
)(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
)
(
)(
)(
)(
)(
)(
)(
61
) .
(
)
(
)
(
)(
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
:13 ) :
(
(
)
)(
(
)
)(
(
)
)(
(
)
)(
(
)
)(
(
)
)(
(
)
)(
: .
-1 :
1 .
2 .
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 .
-2 :
62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-3 .
1 .
2 .
3
4 .
5
6
7
8
9
10
-4
1
2
3
4
5
6
.
.
.
.
.
-5
63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
.
.
.
.
.
64
: .
1
2
3
4
.
5
6
7
8
9 .
10
11
12 .
13
14
15
65