RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01

REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE… 40%
DELIVERY
5– Have been 5 – Attained the
I. Teaching- Learning 1. Improved and enhanced teaching-learning process through June 2017 observed 9-10 times objective on Instructional
Process monthly classroom observation with 75% level of success.. to with post the target date Supervision
March 2018 conferences Documentation

4 - Have been 4 – Attained the Instructional

observed 7-8 times objective 1-2 Supervision
with post days after Agreement
conferences the target date

3 – Have been 3 – Attained the

observed 5-6 times objective 3-4
with post days after
conferences the target date

2 – Have been 2 – Attained the

observed 3-4 times objective 5-6
with post days after
conferences the target date

1- Have been 1 – Attained the

observed 1-2 times objective 7-8
with post days after
conferences the target date
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Prepared 155- 5 - Attained the
I. Teaching-Learning 2. Prepared 163 daily lesson logs/plans in A. Pan. with activities June 2017 163 daily lesson objective on the Daily Lesson
Process and remediation. to logs/plans in target date. Logs/Plan
March 2018 Araling Panlipunan Checklist

Daily Lesson
4 – Prepared 145- 4 - Attained the Logs/Plan
154 daily lesson objective 1 day Checklist
logs/plans in after the target
Araling Panlipunan date.

3 – Prepared 135- 3 - Attained the

144 daily lesson objective 2 days
logs/plans in after the target
Araling Panlipunan date.

2 – Prepared 125- 2 - Attained the

134 daily lesson objective 3 days
logs/plans in after the target
Araling Panlipunan date.

1 – Prepared 115- 1 - Attained the

124 daily lesson objective one (1)
logs/plans in week after the
Araling Panlipunan target date
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – 8 IMs were 5 – Completed the 5 – Attained the
target within the
I. Teaching-Learning 3. Fully implemented the articulated Basic Education June 2017 produced during the objective on Documented List
approved
Process Curriculum including its contextualization, indigenization, to School Year working budget the target date of Instructional
innovation by producing 8 Instructional Materials in Araling March 2018 4 – 6-7 IMs were 4 – Completed the 4 – Attained the Materials
produced during the target utilizing
objective 1-2 made/produced
Panlipunan 9 during the school year. (2 IM’s per Quarter) an additional 5%
School Year days after by the teachers
supplementary
fund of the the target date
approved
working budget Pictures of IM’s
3 - 4-5 IMs were 3 – Completed the 3 – Attained the made and used by
produced during the target utilizing
objective 3-4 the teacher in
an additional 10% their daily
School Year supplementary days after
fund of the the target date lessons
approved
working budget
2 – 2-3 IMs were 2 – Completed the 2 – Attained the
target utilizing
during the School objective 5-6
an additional 15%
Year supplementary days after
fund of the the target date
approved
working budget
1 – 1 IM was 1-Completed the target 1 – Attained the
produced utilizing an additional objective 7-8
20% supplementary fund
during the School approved working budget
days after
Year the target date
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Integrated 3
I. Teaching-Learning 4. Integrated at least three (3) different DepEd policies, June 2017 DepEd policies, 5 - Attained the Lesson
Process programs & projects in daily lessons. to programs and objective within the Plan/Lesson logs
a. Anti – Bullying March 2018 projects in the target date.
b. Child Protection Policy lessons with 100%
c. Gender and Development level of success.
4 – Integrated 3 4 - Attained the
d. Disaster Risk Reduction Management DepEd policies, objective 3 days
programs and after the target
projects in the date.
lessons with 90%
level of success.
3 – Integrated 3 3 - Attained the
DepEd policies, objective 6 days
programs and after the target
projects in the date.
lessons with 80%
level of success.
2 – Integrated 3 2 - Attained the
DepEd policies, objective 9 days
programs and after the target
projects in the date.
lessons with 70%
level of success.
1 – Integrated 3 1 - Attained the
DepEd policies, objective 11 days
programs and after the target
projects in the date.
lessons with 60%
level of success.
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Supported the 5 - Attained the
I. Teaching-Learning 5. Supported in the implementation of different programs and June 2017 implementation of objective on the Accomplishment
Process projects of the school such as Scouting, Adopt-A-School, Project to programs and target date. Report
CAPSULE of the SPS, Sports, with 75% level of success. March 2018 projects of the Pictorials
school with 75- 80%
level of success.
4– Supported the 4 - Attained the
implementation of objective 1 day
programs and after the target
projects of the date.
school with 66-74%
level of success.
3– Supported the 3 - Attained the
implementation of objective 2 days
programs and after the target
projects of the date.
school with 60-65%
level of success.
2– Supported the 2 - Attained the
implementation of objective 3 days
programs and after the target
projects of the date.
school with 55-59%
level of success.
1 – Supported the 1 - Attained the
implementation of objective one (1)
programs and week after the
projects of the target date
school with 50-54%
level of success.
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Attained 66% 5 - Attained the
2. Students’ 1. Attained the Division target on Learning Outcomes (MPS) of June 2017 and above MPS in objective on the Consolidated
Outcomes 66% in Araling Panlipunan 9. to Aral. Panlipunan 9. target date. Quarterly MPS
March 2018 4– Attained 60-65% Report in Araling
4 - Attained the
MPS in Araling Panlipunan
objective 1 day
Panlipunan 9 after the target Item Analysis
date. Report and Most/
3– Attained 50-59% 3 - Attained the Least Learned
MPS in Araling objective 2 days Skills every
Panlipunan 9 after the target quarter
date.
2– Attained 40-59% 2 - Attained the
MPS in Araling objective 3 days
Panlipunan 9 after the target
date.
1 –Attained 30-39% 1 - Attained the
MPS in Araling objective one (1)
Panlikpunan 9 week after the
target date
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY

2. Students’ 2. 100% of the students passed the Araling Panlipunan 9. June 2017 5 – 90 – 100% of 5 - Objective Class Record
Outcomes to the students passed attained within the Grading Sheets
March 2018 the Araling prescribed time
Panlipunan 9

4 – 80 – 89% of 4 - Objective
the students passed attained 2 days
the Araling after the
Panlipuanan 9 prescribed time

3 – 70 – 79% of the 3 - Objective

students passed the attained 4 days
Araling after the
Panlipunan 9 prescribed time

2 – 60 – 69% of the 2 - Objectives

students passed the attained 6 days
Araling Panlipunan 9 after the
prescribed time
1 - Objectives
1 – 50 – 59% of the attained 8 days
students passed the after the
Araling Panlipuanan prescribed time
9
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY

2. Students’ 3. Ensured zero drop-out in the advisory section( Grade 9- June 2016 5 – Maintained 100% 5 - Attained the School Form 2
Outcomes Zachariel) to March zero drop-out in the objective within the
2017 advisory section target date.

4 – Maintained 95- 4 - Attained the

99% zero drop-out objective 3 days
in the advisory after the target
section date.

3 – Maintained 90- 3 - Attained the

94% zero drop-out objective 6 days
in the advisory after the target
section date.

2 – Maintained 85- 2 - Attained the

89% zero drop-out objective 9 days
in the after the target
advisory section date.

1 – Maintained 80- 1 - Attained the

84% zero drop-out objective 11 days
in the advisory after the target
section date
.
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 - Attended 1 5-Completed the 5 - Attained the
3. Professional 1. Attended 1 National, 1 Regional and 1 Division seminar and June 2017 National, 1 Regional target within the objective on the Certificates of
Growth and training. to and 1 Division approved working target date Training and
Development March 2018 seminar and budget Accomplishment
training. Report
4 - Attended 1 4-Completed the 4- Attained the
Regional and 1 target utilizing an objective 2 days
Division seminar and additional 5% after the target
training. supplementary fund date
of the approved
working budget
3 - Attended 1 4-Completed the 3 - Attained the
Division and 1 target utilizing an objective 3 days
Cluster seminar and additional 10% after the target
training. supplementary fund date
of the approved
working budget
2 - Attended 1 4-Completed the 2 - Attained the
Cluster and 1 School target utilizing an objective 4 days
seminar and additional 15% after the target
training. supplementary fund
of the approved
working budget
1 –Did not attended 4-Completed the 1 - Attained the
seminar or training target utilizing an objective 5 days
additional 20% after the target
supplementary fund date
of the approved
working budget
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Attended 10 5 – Attained the
3. Professional 2. Participated and attended at least 10 Department June 2017 Monthly Department objective on Attendance
Growth and Meetings and DEPLAC based on the NCBTS-TSNA - IPPD to Meeting/DEPLAC the target date Certificates of
Development March 2018 Participation
4 – Attended 8-9 4 – Attained the
Monthly Department objective 1-2
Meeting/ DEPLAC days after
the target date
3– Attended 6-7 3 – Attained the
Monthly Department objective 3-4
Meeting/DEPLAC days after
the target date
2 – Attended 2 – Attained the
4-5 Monthly objective 5-6
Department days after
Meeting/DEPLAC the target date

1 – Attended 1-3 1 – Attained the

Monthly Department objective 7-8
Meeting/DEPLAC days after
the target date
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 - 90 -100% 5 - Attained the
3. Professional 3. Attended Faculty Meetings, Conferences and other June 2017 Attendance in objective within the Monitoring and
Growth and Programs and School Activities to Faculty Meetings, target date. Evaluation Report
Development March 2018 Conferences and
other Programs and
School Activities
4- 70 -89% 4 - Attained the
Attendance in objective 3 days
Faculty Meetings, after the target
Conferences and date.
other Programs and
School Activities
3 - 50 -69% 3 - Attained the
Attendance in objective 6 days
Faculty Meetings, after the target
Conferences and date.
other Programs and
School Activities
2 - 30 -49% 2 - Attained the
Attendance in objective 9 days
Faculty Meetings, after the target
Conferences and date.
School Activities
1 - 10 -29% 1 - Attained the
Attendance in objective 11 days
Faculty Meetings, after the target
Conferences and date.
School Activities
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – 75% and above 5 - Attained the
4. Parents 1. Assisted in the conduct of General PTA Assemblies and June 2017 attendance of parents in objective within the Parents’
Involvement and quarterly meeting to confer/inform parents about student’s to assemblies, meetings target date. Attendance and
Community performance, PPA’s and school accomplishments with 75% March 2018 and conferences Pictorials
attendance of parents.
Linkages
4 – 70% - 74% 4 - Attained the
attendance of parents in objective 3 days
assemblies, meetings after the target
and conferences date.

3-65%-69% 3 - Attained the

attendance of parents in objective 6 days
assemblies, meetings after the target
and conferences date.
2 –60%-64% 2 - Attained the
attendance of parents in objective 9 days
assemblies, meetings after the target
and conferences date.
1 –55%-59% 1 - Attained the
attendance of parents in objective 11 days
assemblies, meetings after the target
and conferences date.
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 - Conducted 5 5 - Attained the
4. Parents 2. Conducted 5 Home Visitations to students at risk of Dropping June 2017 home visitations to objective on the Home Visitation
Involvement and out, needing academic and behavioral follow up with 75% level of to parents of students target date Record/ Form
Community Linkages Success March 2018 needing academic
and behavioral
follow up.
4 - Conducted 4 4- Attained the
home visitations to objective 2 days
parents of students after the target
needing academic date
and behavioral
follow up.
3 - Conducted 3 3 - Attained the
home visitations to objective 3 days
parents of students after the target
needing academic date
and behavioral
follow up.
2 - Conducted 2 2 - Attained the
home visitations to objective 4 days
parents of students after the target
needing academic
and behavioral
follow up.
1 - Conducted 1 home 1 - Attained the
visitation to parents objective 5 days
of students needing after the target
academic and date
behavioral follow up.
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Participated in 2 5 - Objective
4. Parents 3. Participated in 2 Community Programs such as Clean-Up Drive June 2017 community attained within the Certificates of
Involvement and and Gift giving within a year with 75% level of success. to programs with 85- prescribed time Teachers
Community Linkages March 2018 100% level of Accomplishment
success within a Report
year
4 – Participated in 2 4 - Objective
community attained 2 days
programs with 75- after the
84% level of prescribed time
success within a
year
3 - Participated in 2 3 - Objective
community attained 4 days
programs with 65- after the
74%level of success prescribed time
within a year
2 - Participated in 2 - Objective
2 community attained 6 days
programs with 55- after the
64%level of success prescribed time
within a year
1 - Participated in 2 1 - Objective
communityprograms attained 8 days
with 50-59% level after the
of success within a prescribed time
year
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 – Served as 5 - Objective
5. Plus Factor 1. Acted as Resource Speaker in seminars, trainings, June 2017 Resource Speaker in attained within the
conferences and other related activities within the school to the SLAC with 100% prescribed time
level (SLAC) March 2018 level of success.
4 – Served as 4 - Objective
Resource Speaker in attained 2 days
the SLAC with 90% after the
level of success. prescribed time
3 – Served as 3 - Objective
Resource Speaker in attained 4 days
the SLAC with 80% after the
level of success. prescribed time
2 – Served as 2 - Objective
Resource Speaker in attained 6 days
the SLAC with 70% after the
level of success. prescribed time
1 - Objective
attained 8 days
after the
prescribed time
1 – Did not
participate in the
SLAC
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY
5 Chaired/ 5 - Attained the
5. Plus Factor 2. Chaired/ Organized at least 1 Cluster DRRMC training June 2017 Organized 1 Cluster objective one week
with 75% level of success to DRRMC training with before the target
March 2018 75%-100% level of date
success
4 – Chaired 4- Attained the
/Organized 1 Cluster objective 3 days
DRRMC training with before the target
70%-74% level of date
success
3 - Chaired/ 3 - Attained the
Organized 1 Cluster objective on the
DRRMC training with target date
65%-69% level of
success
2 - Chaired/ 2 - Attained the
Organized 1 Cluster objective 3 days
DRRMC training with after the target
60%-64% level of
success
1 - Chaired/ 1 - Attained the
Organized 1 Cluster objective 5 days
DRRMC training with after the target
55%-59% level of date
success
 RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VERSION 1.1 REVISION 01
REGION III EFFECTIVITY DATE:
DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name of Employee: RITA S. FLORES Name of Rater: CRISTINE G. CACHUELA
Position: SST – II Position: SST III/ TIC- ARALING PANLIPUNAN
Review Period: MAY 2017 to APRIL 2018 Date of Rating: APRIL 2018
Bureau/Center/Service: DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME- WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS AVERAGE SCORE
LINE PER KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS MOVs Q E T RATING
SERVICE EXAMPLE…
SHALL HAVE…
DELIVERY

5. Plus Factor 3. Acted as School GAD Coordinator June 2017

to
March 2018

FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

RITA S. FLORES CRISTINE G. CACHUELA CRISTELITA S. GARCIA

SST III SST III/TIC- A. PAN. PRINCIPAL IV