You are on page 1of 23

archive.today Saved from https://heartiste.wordpress.

com/2011/01/28/penis-pic-game/ search 14 Oct 2016 02:40:08 UTC


webpage capture no other snapshots from this url
All snapshots from host heartiste.wordpress.com

Webpage Screenshot share download .zip report error or abuse

Home Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List Shit Cuckservatives Say Search

The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon Alpha Assessment Submissions


Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions Dating Market Value Test For Men
Dating Market Value Test For Women About

Feeds: Posts Comments

« Science Can’t Stop Proving Me Right Reader Feedback »

Penis Pic Game


January 28, 2011 by CH
Copyright © 2015. Chateau
Heartiste. All rights reserved.
A reader who wishes to remain anonymous emails:
Comments are a lunchroom

Big fan of your work. food fight and do not


necessarily represent the
I saw this exchange on FB, and I couldn’t resist snapping some screen opinions of Chateau Heartiste
shots. proprietors or contributors.

“R” is an early-thirties female. Commenters J, J, and E are all males.

When I read the initial post, I couldn’t help but picture a cocky Visit the Goodbye, America
asshole, annoyed with her presumption, and deciding the penis pic photojournal website.
was the best way to shut it down.

After “E” suggests something similar, her story changes a bit IMO. But P
I’ll leave the interpretation to you and your readers.
About
Alpha Assessment

Here is the exchange: Submissions


Beta Of The Year
Contest Submissions
Dating Market Value Test
For Men
Dating Market Value Test
For Women
Diversity + Proximity = War:
The Reference List
Shit Cuckservatives Say
The Sixteen Commandments
Of Poon

T U
@FamesBlond @LouiseMensch
The Fundamental Premise in
action. 3 weeks ago

RT @FamesBlond:
@ChateauEmissary
@LouiseMensch SMH at the
sheer bitterness towards the
few men have those options
compared to volume of opp…
3 weeks ago
@Tears4Clowns The sexual
market has a nihilism bias.
But women who really fear
abandonment have another
option: don't marry a super
alpha. 3 weeks ago

@MiaoReport Sure, but like


White altruism, it never stops
"working" until the
environment changes and
makes it pathological.
3 weeks ago

@therajraj That's probably


right, but at the margins
sustained and aggressive agit-
prop can alter people's
behavior. 3 weeks ago

@FredAGunter @ClarkHat
USA circa 1955 was ~90%
White. That couldn't have
been coincidental to America's
dominance then. 3 weeks ago

R C
Erudite Knight on
Another
Media/Hillary/Globalis…
Erudite Knight on
Another
Media/Hillary/Globalis…

Greg Eliot on Grope Solo

Mob Barley on Another


Media/Hillary/Globalis…

Greg Eliot on Grope Solo

Greg Eliot on Grope Solo

Another Media/Hillar… on
Another
Media/Hillary/Globalis…
Mob Barley on Another
Media/Hillary/Globalis…
Dude on Another
Media/Hillary/Globalis…
Johnny Redux on Grope
Solo

T P
How To Get A Girl To Send
Nudes Of Herself
The Wickedest Links
President Gay Mulatto Flaunts
His Erection, Hypocritical
Shitlib Female Reporters
Giggle Like Schoolgirls!
Evidence Mounts That The
"Pussygrab" Leak Came From
A GOP And Cuckryan
Operative, Dan Senor
Grope Solo
Evidence That Hillary Clinton
Has A Serious Neurological
Disease (And The Media Is
Covering It Up)
Tim Wise: Hysterical,
Emotionally Incontinent,
Pudgeball Manlet
The Nexus Of Womanizing
And Wokeness
Krystal Ball And The Hypocrisy
Of The Shitlib Slut
Proof That The Polls Are
Rigged Against Trump

C
Select Category

C
People of Walmart
PostSecret
Stuff White People Like
The Daily Sarge
Things My Boyfriend Says
xkcd

G
60 Years of Challenge
Alpha Game
Cajun
Krauser PUA
Rational Male

Frist of all, props to the guys “J”, “J” and “E” for handling this whiny broad with Roosh V

biting humor, and to the original penis pic sender for offending her sensibilities. I Tenmagnet

like the last suggestion from “J” that she should return fire with a pic of her The G Manifesto

vagina. For some reason I cannot fathom, I doubt she’ll consider that option. The Rookie
Treatise of Love
When “E” implies there must be a good reason penis pic man stood her up and
VKs empire of dirt
“nuked” their conversation, she changes her story in an obvious way that makes
her look better. It’s funny how often women badly contradict themselves in a web
of lies when their sexual market value is disparaged. Recall Maxim #77: S
S
Maxim #77: Women will screech louder the closer your words get to
damaging or exposing vulnerabilities in their sexual market value. Alternative Right
AmRen
Penis pic game justifiably gets a bad rap as a seduction technique, but it’s under- Anonymous Conservative
appreciated as an effective means of belittling a haughty bitch. It is the ultimate Arts & Letters Daily
shit test, because there really is no answer to a picture of a penis on your phone. Audacious Epigone
Even as a serious pickup technique, I think it could work on really twisted, slutty Deconstructing Leftism
girls who crave the most intense asshole experience the cock carousel can Education Realist
provide. Evo and Proud

To properly run penis pic game, you should be aware of the basic rules of Gene Expression

engagement: Hail To You


hbd chick
You don’t have to send a pic of your own penis. Choose from any number Human Biological Diversity
of porn star penises on the web. Or, if you really want to deliver a Information Processing
powerful message, text her a pic of a penis maimed with disease and pus- Lion of the Blogosphere
dripping open sores. Bonus points if you send a black peen to a white Mangans Miscellany
SWPL girl. OneSTDV
If you send a pic of your own penis with authenticity in mind, make sure Page For Men
you are packing heat. You’ll have to be honest with yourself. Treat penis Parapundit
pics like any other text game: does it pass the Jumbotron test? If your Rogue Health and Fitness
penis is flashed on a Jumbotron in front of thousands of spectators, would Steve Sailer
you beam with pride? Or hide in shame? It kind of kills the purpose of The Anti-Gnostic
penis pic game if she shares it with her friends for a good laugh. The Kakistocracy
Caveat to the above point: A pic of a micropenis from a medical reference The Red Pill Review
manual would be funny. It’s like saying “this is all you’re worth, honey.” The Spearhead
Send a flaccid penis. An erection will make her wonder if you get excited Unqualified Reservations
at the thought of texting her. A flaccid penis says all the right things to a Vox Popoli
bitch you want to put in place. Namely, “You are not woman enough to West Hunter
marginally bestir my loins.” Also, you aren’t a gay man texting another Whiskey's Place
gay man.
Include the balls some way. If you have a robust, assertive sack that
frames your penis like a museum piece, this won’t be hard to do. There’s T H
just something extra demeaning about frank *and* beans. M H
Shoot from below. This is a well-known trick that photographers use to Alias Clio
emphasize largeness and dominance. Plus, it’s been shown that women Dusk in Autumn
like looking up at men. Extend the honor to your junk! Lighting is Elysium Revisited
important, too. When lit from below, the penis will have that malevolent Feminine Beauty
look, like a flashlight under the chin. Gucci Little Piggy
Hawaiian Libertarian
Hyperbole and a Half
In Mala Fide
Jack Goes Forth
Overcoming Bias
The Fourth Checkraise
The Rawness
Udolpho

I would run penis pic game, but a phone with a 24 inch screen hasn’t been
invented yet.

Share this:
    
Like

One blogger likes this.

Related

How To Remain All Lust Same How To Get A Girl To


Unflustered By In "Biomechanics is Send Nudes Of
Female Beauty God" Herself
In "Game" In "Game"

Posted in Funny/Lolblogs, The Id Monster, Vanity | 105 Comments

105 Responses
Gorbachev on January 28, 2011 at 1:36 pm

Women spin and spin and spin.

That’s the most amazing thing.

 Like

MitchMac84 on January 28, 2011 at 1:38 pm

good to see the guys not “omg-ing” and giving humor…..

 Like

DirkJohanson on January 28, 2011 at 1:46 pm


One other tip – only send penis pics if there is also a girl in the picture
approving of you one way or another.

 Like

Firepower on January 28, 2011 at 1:50 pm

lmfao.
I send out peenpix every xmas, with my rig nestling as baby J-dog in the
manger. mandy proposed marriage.

 Like

The Truth on January 28, 2011 at 1:52 pm

When your dick’s in a butt,


Or the mouth of a slut,
That’s gomorrah.
When you’re fucking a goat,
In the anus or the throat,
That’s gomorrah.

— Datroof on reddit

 Like

maurice on January 28, 2011 at 2:02 pm

E is right that it’s a nuke that shuts down a conversation, but it also
probably got the hindbrain stirring as well- especially as she wouldn’t
have been texting this dude to begin with if she weren’t already
interested in him. if so, dick-pic game is sort of the ultimate caveman direct
game, if you posit she’s already attracted. the conscious brain is shocked but the
loins are stirred. That may be one other element behind her overwrought prose-
unwelcome arousal.

 Like

Firepower on January 28, 2011 at 2:08 pm

I’d send a dickpic to roger alan currie, then, but he wants nipple pics too.

 Like

Paladin on January 28, 2011 at 2:16 pm

LOL @ 24 inch screen!

 Like

Galloway on January 28, 2011 at 2:18 pm

I agree, lol XDD

 Like

Lara on January 28, 2011 at 2:29 pm

You need to grow up.

 Like

The Truth on January 28, 2011 at 2:29 pm

Whodat

 Like

Lara on January 28, 2011 at 2:32 pm


I know someone who did this with one of those disposable cameras they
leave on the tables at weddings.

 Like

Danger on January 28, 2011 at 2:33 pm

That’s the funniest shit I’ve read all week. What a great way to shut down
a bitch.

 Like

Firepower on January 28, 2011 at 2:35 pm

Lara

I know someone who did this with one of those disposable


cameras they leave on the tables at weddings.

I bet you chastised him


by fucking his brains out

 Like

Captain Obvious on January 28, 2011 at 2:43 pm

Here’s a story that begs for comment:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/padma_lakshmi_adam_dell_fight_

Padma Lakshmi, host of Top Chef, is doing everything she can to deny that she
carried the spawn of a beta to term.

Adam Dell, brother of Dell Computer’s founder, is the father of Lakshmi’s


daughter, but Lakshmi refuses to acknowledge it, keeping his name off the birth
certificate, and preventing him from having any contact with his daughter as
much as possible. He is suing her of course.

Money quote:

After a relation ship that lasted two years, “Lakshmi withdrew emotionally, and
began to attack [Dell] verbally with gratuitous insults. Among other things, she
told him she found him to be an ‘unambitious’ man with an ‘uninteresting’ career
and equally ‘unmemorable’ friends,’ the suit says.”

Dell is a highly successful venture capitalist and partner at a private equity firm
with total assets of $4 billion. What a loser. Compared to his competition at least.

Ted Forstmann, who Lakshmi tells her daughter to call “Papa,” is a legend of the
leveraged buyout era and 30 years Dell’s Lakshmi’s senior. And what does
Forstmann do for a living today? He’s a partner at a private equity firm of course.

No wonder she prayed that Forstmann, and not Dell, was the father of little
Krishna. Here’s a clip from the delivery room at the hospital:

Playback isn't supported on this device.

0:50 / 0:00

 Like

Legion on January 28, 2011 at 2:47 pm


http://www.xvideos.com/video773677/small_penis_femdom_cfnm_humiliation

^ Video of a guy with a micropenis, getting said micropenis fiddled with by three
women.

I think I would end myself.

 Like

Reece on January 28, 2011 at 2:53 pm

My friends and I recently thought of a new iPhone app – ‘Dick’tures With


Friends

We thought of taking a picture of your erect member and choose your scene like
it’s on a green screen…the beach, the mountains, Mount Rushmore! Send it to a
girl like in the story and somehow capture the horror/confusion on her face when
she sees your dick with the Manhattan skyline in the background. Then share with
friends!

 Like

Texting123 on January 28, 2011 at 2:53 pm

Need some advice from a Chateau vet. Supposed to be going out on a


“date” with some guy. He is really interested and excited. If I stand him
up will that work in my favor? I apologize to the host and everyone for
disrupting the convo. Thanks.

 Like

Deutsch on January 28, 2011 at 3:00 pm

Lara – the “grow up” argument is pretty lame, at least post something
entertaining.

 Like

The Truth on January 28, 2011 at 3:00 pm

Texting yup. Stand him up and then go join a nunnery.

 Like

what on January 28, 2011 at 3:18 pm

“It is the ultimate shit test, because there really is no answer to a picture
of a penis on your phone.”

Yes, there is an answer to everything…..

if it is from someone I don’t like:

1) oh, THAT SMALL!!


2) where is it? hahha!!!!
3)it looks plastic
4) ewwww!!!!
5) lol!!!!
6) sorry, vomiting sounds.
7) it’s not working…hehe!
8) poor thing

If it is from someone I LIKE:

can’t tell you hee! hee!

 Like

Science on January 28, 2011 at 3:19 pm

@Firepower
You just gave me my Christmas card idea for next year.

 Like
Texting123 on January 28, 2011 at 3:21 pm

@The Truth

Listen, I mean well. I just dont want to make the same mistakes I made
in the past. Thanks to this site, I am an avid reader, I am very afraid of what my
display of interest will do any budding feelings between us. I just want to know if
playing hard to get will hold his interest. I am not trying to hurt anyone.

 Like

what on January 28, 2011 at 3:22 pm

another one….haahahah!!!!

It’s ET!!!hahahha!!!

 Like

Legion on January 28, 2011 at 3:25 pm

Off topic: I just read something interesting in the Britannica Guide to


Genetics:

Tanned girls, following a DNA script that they have no control over, may be
particularly attracted to faired skinned men (such as redheads) and vice versa.

Got me wondering. You don’t see many redhead couples. And very tanned men
tend to like paler women. At least in my anecdotal experience.

Should we take into account our complexion and target the women who match
our genetic template?

Has the Château any thoughts on this?

 Like

Rant Casey - BR on January 28, 2011 at 3:26 pm

I know someone who did this with one of those disposable


cameras they leave on the tables at weddings.

Fine. I got ya.

You recongnized the man by the penis.

I’m sure it was a fond memory, Lara.

 Like

Science on January 28, 2011 at 3:27 pm

@texting123… if you are serious… it doesn’t work both ways. if you stood
me up, I’d drop you and never call you again. Men are not like women.
Women respond to unavailable men, not the other way around. If you
really like him, then be feminine, show him you like him, dress up for him, cook
for him, show your feelings. Don’t follow advice designed for men.

 Like

Corporal Hicks on January 28, 2011 at 3:32 pm

Man, researching that Padma Lakshi chick on the Net is painful.

What a drama-queen-hypergamy-uber-bitch….

Oh yeah. I just described modern women.

 Like

The_King on January 28, 2011 at 3:38 pm

You forgot to add “Suck it” in the title.

 Like
Texting123 on January 28, 2011 at 3:44 pm

@Science

Thank you.

 Like

Anton on January 28, 2011 at 3:47 pm

Worst post in a quite a while…but everyone gets an off day.

 Like

Rant Casey - BR on January 28, 2011 at 3:52 pm

@texting123… if you are serious… it doesn’t work both ways. if


you stood me up, I’d drop you and never call you again. Men
are not like women. Women respond to unavailable men, not the
other way around. If you really like him, then be feminine, show him
you like him, dress up for him, cook for him, show your feelings. Don’t
follow advice designed for men.

Do all that… be attentive and display a fine grade of womanhood.

 Like

The Truth on January 28, 2011 at 4:08 pm

I just looked up Parma Lakshmi. She looks like a tranny. Definitely man
jaw and high T.

 Like

Bricona on January 28, 2011 at 4:10 pm

I’m off to send my girlfriend pictures of my penis.

I think it’d be quite charming to send a penis pic that is an obviously


completely different race. So it’s not an, “ew gross, let me show the person next
to me this guy’s penis,” but a WTF effect, where if someone spreads it around,
there’s no way the penis matches the predecessor. It’s just stupid to be showing
people a picture of any ole random penis.

Would I do this in real life? Who knows. Maybe in a few years it’ll be considered as
romantic.

Would love some plot and imagery.

 Like

Brett Favre on January 28, 2011 at 4:26 pm

If you send a pic of your own penis with authenticity in mind,


make sure you are packing heat.

Dammit! Now you tell me?

 Like

John on January 28, 2011 at 4:36 pm

Hey Lara, the penis pic with the wedding camera was a king of queens
episode, try to make up some new shit to amuse us instead of recycling
sitcoms, thx

 Like

Lara on January 28, 2011 at 4:39 pm


John,
I don’t watch that show, but I wonder if that is where this guy got the
idea from.

 Like

Lara on January 28, 2011 at 4:51 pm

Actually John it happened about 10 years ago so maybe he was the


inspiration for the show.

 Like

what on January 28, 2011 at 4:53 pm

@Firepower
lmfao.
“I send out peenpix every xmas, with my rig nestling as baby J-dog in the
manger. mandy proposed marriage.”

is it a pop up card? hehehe!! merry christmas!!! lol!!!

 Like

Mr. N on January 28, 2011 at 4:55 pm

@Texting123

Men are not women.

 Like

Trimegistus on January 28, 2011 at 4:57 pm

I must include a warning here: DON’T send dickpix to any of the


following:

1) Women you are going to college with


2) Women you work with
3) Women you have hired for any reason except as hookers
4) Women who are lawyers

Dickpix to any of them will get you a lawsuit faster than you can say “John
Holmes.”

 Like

Doug1 on January 28, 2011 at 5:29 pm

Texting123–

You’ve gotten good advice.

Standing him up is real bad. Flaking with decent notice isn’t as bad but won’t
make him more attracted, and might lead him to lose interest, depending on his
options.

If’s there’s chemistry, kiss as soon as he makes the play. Just follow your feelings
there. But for bf commitment purposes delaying when you’ll go all the way does
tend to work. If you feel passion show it, just restrain yourself and him from full
on sex for awhile.

Well it tends to work on less alpha guys, or sorta alpha guys who are really, really
attracted to the girl even before sex. It runs the risk of him losing interest though.
I’m sure you’ve read about the three date rule here for aspiring alphas, but many
girls getting with less alpha guys, or really hot girls, can make guys with less
game pursue for longer. Don’t delay too long though.

If you push it too far and he does fade away, your texting him a couple of weeks
down the line (when it looks pretty clear he’s gone cold) about hoping to see him
again soon, will usually work, esp. if he’s contemplating you as a gf. But then
you’ve got to have sex, if he’s got any game in him at all.

 Like

Tinderbox on January 28, 2011 at 5:42 pm


@Texting123

Also be cool, good natured and not clingy.

 Like

Cauthon on January 28, 2011 at 5:44 pm

One of the best weeks ever at the Chateau. Fucking hilarious.

 Like

The Specimen on January 28, 2011 at 5:52 pm

That’s a good one. Those “how come u never called me back,”


conversations always leave oppoutinities for ventures in creative
assholery.

 Like

walawala on January 28, 2011 at 6:01 pm

Penis game seems like an angry response = beta.

It’s not funny, it’s not cocky (pardon the obvious pun), it’s juvenile. I
think it would only lower your value by sending a photo.

It displays way too much thought. It’s the equivalent of “Fuck you”. Also it could
be seen as illegal or bordering and while it may raise questions, I think it’s more
creepy than clever.

There are far better ways to cancel. Like just canceling. But by sending a creepy
text photo like this it makes you seem crazy and unstable.

 Like

Evil Alpha on January 28, 2011 at 6:08 pm

“I know someone who did this with one of those disposable cameras they
leave on the tables at weddings.”

Isn’t this standard at all weddings? I can’t name any of my good friends who
haven’t done this.

 Like

Gorbachev on January 28, 2011 at 6:10 pm

My standard response to all shit is silence.

Or sarcastic humor.

“Good for you.”

(after lots of whining or bs): “Yeah, thanks.”

“I guess it’s my loss. Bye.”

But it’s always better to answer with silence.

Then the hamster spins and they don’t know what to think.

Remember this, people.

 Like

Question of the day on January 28, 2011 at 6:31 pm

threesum with two menstruating women, Alpha or beta ??

 Like

Texting123 on January 28, 2011 at 6:34 pm

@Doug1
@Science

You guys are from Heaven, thanks.


 Like

Corporal Hicks on January 28, 2011 at 6:35 pm

Good points, Gorb.

The vast majority of men sink themselves by opening their mouths.

Silence in the face of shit-testing is best. (ball-scratching can be added for


emphasis.)

One-word responses are second best. (“So?”)

Two-word responses are third best. (“Your point?)

The more words you add, the lower down you go.

 Like

Gorbachev on January 28, 2011 at 6:57 pm

Treat shit-testing and other such female follies with sarcastic contempt.

NOT contempt. That sounds too bitter.

The point is to be happy to walk away and to consider her opinions irrelevant – in
a sarcastic or funny way.

You can even be charming about it.

But silence or sarcastic contempt is the only way to go.

 Like

Doug1 on January 28, 2011 at 7:31 pm

Gorb–

Bemusement works well.

 Like

Mr. C on January 28, 2011 at 9:39 pm

” Penis game seems like an angry response = beta. ”

If it’s done after you meet her and she hasn’t shown any interest ; its
beta.

On the other hand.

If you have stood her up and sent her a picture of your cock with “Suck It” as a
caption … it’s beta but also hilarious.

 Like

xra on January 28, 2011 at 7:39 pm

“robust, assertive sack” are you fuckin kidding me

incredible writer this guy

 Like

Rum on January 28, 2011 at 10:00 pm

Does anyone remember the early internet classic, “HorseGag”? Though it


was only about a minute long, it managed to convey quite a lot of tender
emotion and sentimentality – just what the girl in question might respond
to – especially the final, climactic scene.
I would send a bit of that if I could. It would strike exactly the right note in this
situation, imho.

 Like

Viagra_Falls on January 28, 2011 at 10:27 pm

Probably belaboring an obvious point here, but Penis Pic game can work
as a buildup and not just as a tell-off.
Just start the sex talk on the IM or through texting, then send her a sequence of
progressively racy pics while calibrating her response (personally, I use a
striptease sequence), which ends with a full-on cock shot.

90% percent of the time it will amplify attraction. Of course, you have to be hung

 Like

Anonymous on January 29, 2011 at 12:52 am

Facebook is stupid.

 Like

pǝnisǝs are funny on January 29, 2011 at 1:15 am

LOL!

 Like

hehehe on January 29, 2011 at 1:16 am

LOL

 Like

Tom on January 29, 2011 at 1:36 am

What Men Know That Women Don’t

Playback isn't supported on this device.

0:00 / 0:00

 Like

Solvemygirlproblems on January 29, 2011 at 2:05 am

I tried penis game in high school and the girl uploaded the photo onto her
Myspace. Owned.

 Like

Alpha Cat on January 29, 2011 at 2:34 am

I’m pretty sure everybody knows to take a picture of your dick if you see
a camera just sitting on a table. Or a cellphone camera…. All guys do this.

 Like

greenlander on January 29, 2011 at 2:55 am

And if she DID in fact respond with a picture of her vag, the guy could
always come back with “Seriously tho! ur pussy rocks!”

 Like
The Swede on January 29, 2011 at 6:42 am

I was hitting it off with a drunk floozy when some guy she was texting
with, sent her a penis pic. She disappeared later that night.

The next day, I found out that she went to his place to gyrate on said penis.

Penis texts can work.

 Like

Silver Fox on January 29, 2011 at 11:00 am

What your describing is known as sexual gambling, in transactional


analysis…first studied in 60s.

Todays Men vastly underestimate their sexual gambling hand; women use the
bluff, ace, fold viciously from about 14 on. Some Men catch on at 34-40 or after a
divorce…ie, having a comb when bald.

Hence, the male only uses the loss/pay-up card.

Most Men assume if they are re-buffed, they MUST leave the table civily….usually
enforced by societal-laws.

However, women know society rarely enforces its social laws, but denigrates
losers with depravity.

Hence we see women key cars, clean out husbands, and cheat at least 25% in all
divorces, are bearers 10+% bastard childs according to unmatching blood tests
based on insurance/birth records.

The Penis pic is the classic smart-bomb txt that explodes slowly while its deep in
foundation.

Using this strips the recipients of all dignity, and reduces her ability to strike
again.

Its the classic salting of fields, poisoning of well, rape & pillage.

Ancient warriors knew to leave agressors able to strike was folly.

Women, strip your dignity (with your participation) when you leave the table
civily, enforcing MENs forced helpessness for the next Woman to abuse…thus
widening the pool of available targets.

Her astonishement that “he walks among us” is like when Nat Geo finds the
ancient tribe where Men still have harems (ie, Midddle East)…and spew
propaganda.

Woe to he who does not play his card well.

 Like

DirkJohanson on January 29, 2011 at 12:54 pm

@ question of the day

A threesome is alpha as long as you are the center of the action.

If you are more or less just watching or jacking off while the chicks do each other,
it might be beta, unless you are the one opting out of the action or are otherwise
way oversexed.

Two chicks on the rag in a threesome are probably planning on sucking a lot of
dick – in that scenario, you are definitely alpha.

Whatever the situation, they are probably not planning on spending most of their
time eating each other out – the most common scenario for a guy in a threesome
to possibly be beta.

 Like

Firepower on January 29, 2011 at 1:36 pm

Silver Fox

What your describing is known as sexual gambling, in


transactional analysis…first studied in 60s.

Women, strip your dignity (with your participation) when you leave
the table civily, enforcing MENs forced helpessness for the next
Woman to abuse…thus widening the pool of available targets.

You’re
the only intelligent
poster remaining here

I now seriously dread the incapacity of today’s Government Educated Male. They
have proven themselves worthy of nothing but a slavery mindset.

 Like

Workshy Joe on January 29, 2011 at 2:34 pm

1. Send a penis pic attachment on an email to Girl A.

2. On the text of the email, make out as if you are talking to an


imaginary Girl B as if you had their email addys mixed up.

3. Don’t forget to mention in the email what a pain in the ass Girl A is.

4. Conclude the email by asking Girl B if she likes the look of your junk and wants
to suck it.

Got that?

 Like

Thag Jones on January 29, 2011 at 2:41 pm

I know I shouldn’t encourage this behaviour, but you could always send
one of these…..

http://www.google.ca/images?q=priapus&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-
US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-
8&source=univ&ei=E21ETdLBCIPqgQfnn9nfAQ&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=t

I will now go back to pretending I don’t laugh at fart jokes.

 Like

senseiern on January 29, 2011 at 2:54 pm

The best reply to a penis pic would be for her to send a pic of her giving
some other guy a bj. It’s a counter-nuclear strike, and chances are, like
real nuke warfare, the end will be a disaster for all involved, at least she
didn’t die alone.

 Like

what on January 29, 2011 at 3:59 pm

Sitting nicely side by side just hanging around earlier. Couldn’t help
myself…….
“soososooo, Howcome I haven’t received a peeniepix from you yet? hee!
hee! hee!?” (waiting for reply, eyes wide, grinning , swaying my bod in my
temptress way! ) lol!! silence……he is loss for words!!!! lol!!!

see ya!

 Like

J.S. Mills on January 29, 2011 at 4:35 pm

Jesus Christ, what an accurate barometer of the level of thought and


maturity on display here.

I’ve been the recipient of more cock shots on my cell than I care to count, and
never once have they done anything more than convince me that sender was a
moron with a toddler’s level of interest in displaying his genitalia.

Seriously, this is the sort of behavior I’d expect only from a boy under 8 yrs. old.
It doesn’t even warrant any further thought about what the sender’s motives
might be or anything else – who the fuck cares what said idiot’s purpose was, just
delete it and don’t waste another thought on it.

And for all the talk here about how men and women are different – here’s a BIG
truth about the female persuasion that’s seemingly escaped you all …. girls don’t
get horny from close-ups of genitals, especially when disconnected from the
person they’re attached to. AT ALL. Just because some wet pussy shot gets you
off, doesn’t work the other way. And any anecdotes that may convince you
otherwise are merely coincidental, for which you are misreading the causality, i
guarantee you. I.E. – girl was planning on fucking the sender anyways, regardless
of his little candid camera shot.

This idiot woman from the text messages was making a big deal out of nothing, in
a stupid attempt for sympathy or to start some dialog with her as an innocent
victim. Don’t generalize from one random display of social ineptitude.

[Editor: You do realize this post was done in jest.]

 Like

Science on January 29, 2011 at 4:59 pm

J.S. Mills loves cockshotz. You can tell by the 250 words spent on how
much she hates cockshotzz.

 Like

C on January 29, 2011 at 5:11 pm

I am intimidated by smart, independent women like J.S.

Cock.

 Like

My Name Is Jim on January 29, 2011 at 5:21 pm

Guys, you know what the femcunt reaction to this is, define this as
stalking/sexual harassment and start getting guys who send these shots
put on sex offender lists. Make the slippery slope argument to the legal
system that is in their back pocket and makes its money cleaning out men who
spend their lives establishing themselves in actual productive capacities rather
than just taking other people’s legitimately earned assets. If he sends a dick pic,
he must be a rapist in the making, help us we’re women in crisis. You know the
drill. Look for the cases to start before long. There are other ways to take a stuck
up bitch down a peg, no woman gets to see my dick unless I can trust her. It’s a
members only club.

 Like

My Name Is Jim on January 29, 2011 at 5:24 pm

By the way isn’t this what did in bret farve?

 Like

betondo fuchatuch on January 29, 2011 at 6:41 pm

@gorb & corporal hicks.

Exactly right. Silence is the best motivator to get a woman to take


another step – the more revealing step.

I’ve said it before – woman are like cats. The open box (talkative, explaining
actions and words guy) doesn’t generate interest, but a cat will drive herself to
exhaustion trying to peek into the closed box (silence, or indifference at the most
guy).

I’ve found out more about women (true motivations, depth of her desire for my
company or dickage) with silence than I ever have by exchanging verbal volleys.

 Like

ChooChoo5000 on January 29, 2011 at 8:19 pm

Wow, one hell of a blog. I mean, seriously, it’s a treasure trove.

I got a question. I got a girl that I dumped (the girl was great.) Here’s
the backstory. I was gonna go abroad and another chick plastered my facebook
wall with all sort of cutesy comments and pics. Blah blah blah. The chick here, my
girlfriend, found out about this shit and started ignoring me. Wouldn’t call me,
would end our conversations quickly and would cancel all of my dates (would say
she’s “busy”), I figured, fuck, I like this chick, but won’t take this sort of shit from
her, so out my pride, I dumped her. Now, this is when I didn’t know about her
finding out about these comments.

Well, turns out she saw those comments, thought I was playing her and returned
to the other chick. Well… no.

Now, I wanna get this girl back. Any ideas?

 Like

J.S. Mills on January 29, 2011 at 9:34 pm

Editor – yes, got the jesting tone, but given that I have received many
such pics, some obviously think its a great/hilarious idea for some
reason. Yeah, it is kind of hilarious, but in a ‘laughing at you, not with
you’ kind of way.

Mr. ChooChoo
– Having been the girl going abroad in a very similar situation, can I just
recommend telling her the truth? That you like her, not the dumb chick trying to
get attention with all the fb shit and who means nothing to you, but that you
weren’t willing to sacrifice your pride when she was treating you badly for what
you thought was no reason?

Thats a perfectly reasonable response to the situation, and if this ex-gf of yours is
also reasonable, and also likes you, it shouldn’t be a huge deal to explain what
happened and put it behind you guys. No harm, no foul. But if she continues to
make a huge deal of it or bring it up, she’s either a drama queen or looking for a
reason to disconnect from you.

 Like

J.S. Mills on January 29, 2011 at 9:38 pm

Btw, Jim is your name…. I am a lawyer, and would find it incredibly


pathetic that anyone would waste their time on trying to prosecute
something so juvenile. The Bret Favre chick included – if it hadn’t been
someone famous who she hoped to gain fame from connecting her name to doubt
she’d have given it a second thought.

 Like

Rum on January 29, 2011 at 11:17 pm

J.S. MIlls

You come here posing as a lawyer chick who likes to travel overseas and
who tells guys to “be reasonable” in their dealings with women. Then you speak of
the Favre situation as if it was a matter to “prosecute” or not.
Res ipsa loquitur, baby.

 Like

Gregory Magarshak on January 30, 2011 at 1:38 am

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/study-finds-that-the-
%E2%80%9Csexier%E2%80%9D-the-anchorwomen-is-the-less-a-male-
viewer-remembers/

 Like

bowman on January 30, 2011 at 2:25 am

If you don’t have time to take a picture, would a simple 8===O do the
trick?

 Like

namae nanka on January 30, 2011 at 3:54 am

“Btw, Jim is your name…. I am a lawyer”


oh noes!!

South Park sexueller belästigungspanda

Playback isn't supported on this device.

0:00 / 0:27

 Like

Alpha Cat on January 30, 2011 at 4:54 am

J.S. : The picture isn’t meant to turn her on. I figured you’d be smart
enough to figure that out. And we all know that men never “mature”.
Fuck that noise. That’s what society wants you to become, a slave to the
system.

 Like

xsplat on January 30, 2011 at 5:23 am

That’s what society wants you to become, a slave to the


system.

Society IS women, therefore, that’s what women want to shame you into
becoming.

 Like

Mr. C on January 30, 2011 at 6:24 am

I thought this might be worth sharing ….

Freedom is the new opiate of the masses.

Modern society leaves individuals to decide their restraints in spending, eating and
sex, and many people are still adjusting to this independence
UNTIL the recent troubles the entire world was awash in cheap money. Easy
money inflated housing bubbles in the US, Australia, Ireland, Spain, Britain and
elsewhere.

When money is cheap, borrowing is easy and nobody is terribly interested in


deferring gratification. Credit in itself is not evil; on the contrary, it is the lifeblood
of civilisation, which it underwrites by fuelling innovation and prosperity.

But when credit is used to fund consumption rather than investment, we are
taking from the future rather than investing in it, and for a while doing so became
a near-universal practice.

Since the turn of the 21st century, for example, credit card issuance has exploded
practically everywhere, and by 2008, the world had 3.67 billion payment cards.
Just as money can be a double-edged sword, so too can capitalism, which Adam
Smith praised for giving each of us strong incentives to moderate our behaviour in
socially productive ways, the better to assure our success in the marketplace.

Capitalism really has been a powerful force on behalf of responsibility and


temperance, inculcating such bourgeois habits as study and nonviolence, as well
as legal and social structures that support these virtues. “A man is seldom so
innocently employed,” Samuel Johnson observed, “as when he is getting money.”

In keeping with this tradition, the workplace is for the most part a citadel of
moderation and restraint. It’s only after we knock off for the day that the system
begins its hysterical whispering in our innermost ear. “Cut loose!” it says. “Buy.
Eat. Screw.”
And that’s where the trouble starts, for in our lives as consumers, capitalism does
everything it can to seduce our more indulgent selves, sometimes urging us to
indulge so unrestrainedly that the system itself is endangered, as it was recently
by a global debt orgy.

But capitalism cannot thrive without some moral and cultural framework to
contain or at least channel its gales, for the essential contradiction of the system
is that it’s bent on producing self-controlled workers yet disinhibited shoppers, and
thus it undermines the self-mastery that it inculcates.

The difficulty seems to occur when affluence outstrips culture, as it can when
credit expands much faster than custom or cultivation can contain it.

That’s why indebtedness can be such a problem, because it instantly bestows


wealth beyond our accustomed capacity to manage it.

The explosion of credit we’ve seen during the past 30 years was especially likely
to lead to trouble, since it lifted a constraint on people’s spending without giving
them any more income.

In 1980, the year Ronald Reagan was elected, US household debt stood at what
must have seemed the enormous sum of $US1.4 trillion. In 2008 the figure was
10 times larger.

THE evolution of matrimony from something like an ironclad contract into an


arrangement as likely to be broken as not says a lot about the modern dilemma
and the way social changes have altered the self-control landscape.

Premarital sex is taken for granted, as is birth control and a little youthful
experimentation with drugs. (Think of all the politicians who didn’t inhale.)
Homosexuality has come out of the closet. Second careers, second homes, second
spouses, and even second childhoods are commonplace. These changes are part
of a tectonic social adjustment: a shift, in the developed world, away from
tradition and received social structures in favour of personal choice and self-
invention.

In the non-Islamic world, at least, church and ideology no longer provide much in
the way of traditional limits on individual behaviour.

Amen, let us hasten to add; who wants someone else to tell us what to do? It’s
the same with money; although lots of people are ready to criticise affluence,
nobody I know truly craves the opposite.

But the result of these changes is that each of us must rely more on ourselves for
the kind of restraint that was once imposed externally, back in the bad old days.
In those days, we still inhabited our parents’ moral universe, the recently
deceased historian Tony Judt recalled recently in describing how circumscribed life
was before the social revolution of the 1960s.

“Dating was difficult: no one had cars; our homes were too small for privacy;
contraception was available but only if you were willing to confront a disapproving
pharmacist.

“There was a well-founded presumption of innocence and ignorance, for boys and
girls alike. Most boys I knew attended single-sex schools and we rarely
encountered women.”

What accounts for this great change? Simply put, our social arrangements are
freer now because we can afford them to be.

As the political scientist Ronald Inglehart writes: “In a major part of the world, the
disciplined, self-denying, and achievement-oriented norms of industrial society are
giving way to an increasingly broad latitude for individual choice of lifestyles and
individual self-expression.”

That’s a great achievement, but it comes at a price.

Emile Durkheim, the father of modern sociology, warned in 1897 of the dangers
that come with freedom, affluence, and technology, in particular, of a dangerous
condition he called anomie (from the Greek anomia, lawlessness). Anomie means
lacking clear norms, standards or ideals.

Durkheim felt that people should live in a web of interlocking networks and
institutions that would provide a structure of values; without these values, we
might fall into purely selfish and carnal behaviours.

Families are less likely to be intact, and when a father is present he is less likely
to be the authority figure he might have been in the days of patriarchy.

This change in the purpose of the family has encouraged the development of
youth culture, which inevitably devalues patience, prudence, and other stodgy-
sounding values associated with maturity.
Abandon is a virtue in such an environment; it’s not just what the young do, but
what the non-young may embrace, if only to prove to themselves and others that
they aren’t old.

In the 20th century, the historian Eli Zaretsky writes, “people separated from
traditional familial morality gave up their obsession with self-control and thrift,
and entered into the sexualised ‘dreamworlds’ of mass consumption on behalf of a
new orientation to personal life.”

The really big change isn’t in the law but in us. I think we’re more willing to put
our own happiness first. People who find their marriages unfulfilling want to split
up, and there is no longer much social pressure to keep them together. Should
there be?

Probably. I am not aware of anyone arguing that our high rate of coupling and
uncoupling is good for children.

There is no simple answer. What we’ve lost in our modern domestic arrangements
is a strong if inflexible structure for channelling our actions to the benefit of
others, even if we later change our minds about things.

If the purpose of the family has changed, so too has the purpose of life, even if
we don’t often think about it. The historian Darrin McMahon has noted “the steady
erosion of other ways of conceiving of life’s purpose and end”, such as virtue or
honour, instead of just pleasure.

“In a world that places a premium on good feeling and positive emotion, these
other ends have nowhere near the power to channel and constrain our choices
that they once did. The same may be said of religion — long considered the
ultimate end — but which today, even in places such as the US, where religious
observance remains strong, is more often than not treated as a means to a better
and happier life.”

Yet most traditional religions, in one form or another, also usefully emphasise
sobriety, sexual restraint, moderation, and mindfulness generally. It’s obvious
even to an infidel like me that religion is a useful way for people to find meaning,
or belonging, or even just solace in a harsh and chancy world; and in the absence
of religion people are more likely to seek those things by pandering to their own
less-welcome desires.

Maybe the best way to uphold one’s desired desires is to form a habit. A habit is a
behaviour that we repeat over and over, more or less on autopilot. These
behaviours may require conscious effort at first, but through repetition they
become virtually automatic in the face of certain triggers.

Thus, the conscious mind will offload nearly anything it possibly can to the brain’s
more automated precincts, moving repeated activities from the prefrontal cortex
deeper into the brain and thereby saving processing power for more important
things and perhaps reducing the chance of error.

In fact, many of the things we do best we do without thinking.

Habits aren’t necessarily bad. What habits are is sticky. Bad ones, which seem to
travel in packs, are the hardest to break because they are built from our most
instinctual urges. Good ones are to be cherished; self-command can be achieved,
Aristotle tell us, when “obedience to reason becomes habitual”.

 Like

Mr. C on January 30, 2011 at 6:31 am

Edited extract from We Have Met the Enemy: Self-control in an Age of


Excess, by Daniel Akst, Scribe , $32.95. Akst has written for The Wall
Street Journal and other newspapers. His previous books include Wonder
Boy, about a financial fraud he helped expose

 Like

walawala on January 30, 2011 at 7:18 am

@Gorby

“”My standard response to all shit is silence.

Or sarcastic humor.””

Another good one, in texting is the standard: hahahaha

it’s the ultimate non-answer;


I had:

HER: “My next question, was anyone staying with you there in your room?”

ME: 20 minutes later “Hahahahaha”

 Like

Gorbachev on January 30, 2011 at 8:22 am

@Walawala,

Alao “Hm.”

 Like

Gorbachev on January 30, 2011 at 8:22 am

I meant “also hm.”

 Like

Thag Jones on January 30, 2011 at 8:46 am

The picture isn’t meant to turn her on. I figured you’d be smart enough to
figure that out.

If she can’t figure that out I wouldn’t want her as my lawyer!

 Like

evil alpha on January 30, 2011 at 8:52 am

“Editor – yes, got the jesting tone, but given that I have received
many such pics, some obviously think its a great/hilarious idea
for some reason. Yeah, it is kind of hilarious, but in a ‘laughing at
you, not with you’ kind of way.”

Umm. Can you broadcast that you are a DUMB CUNT any louder? Well, I guess
you could get a forehead tattoo. Stupid bitches, ya see, attract penis pics just like
magnets attract iron filings.
You may wanna start looking in the mirror. Men obviously really, really don’t like
you.

 Like

tunacanman - working the sides on January 30, 2011 at 10:30 am

a good pal of mine used to (like clockwork) take any stray cameras he
found at parties, take it to the can, and then take a few interesting c
shots… his favorite was contortionist shots. Think: ‘things that make you
go hmmm…’

Best memory was seeing him at a party after the hostess sorta shot him down,
then he turns to me beaming and says, “she’s gonna get the epcot center baby!”

how long till any of you figure out what the Epcot center is?
hmmmm?

 Like

lulu on January 30, 2011 at 3:26 pm

I once received, out of the blue, a ball sack pic. It was from a friend,
never had sexual contact, but I was crestfallen. Such a bad sign.

 Like

betadyermom on January 30, 2011 at 5:17 pm

Some guy pulled this with an ex of mine. She had messed around with
him at some point but decided he was too “needy” (beta) and was
blowing him off. One day he sends her a file over IM and *bam* giant
dick pic on her work computer. Really got under her skin.

 Like
Viagra_Falls on January 30, 2011 at 7:37 pm

@betadyermom

Good thing she was a chick, any guy in a corporate environment would
get fired for having nudity on his comp…

 Like

old guy on January 30, 2011 at 11:34 pm

Careful, don’t do it at work:

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/01/air-force-gurney-
sentenced-012811/

“But Bryant countered by holding up a photo Gurney sent to one of the women. It
was a full-body nude shot, apparently taken with his cell-phone camera.

“See the rank he’s wearing in this picture?” she said. “That’s the future he
deserves, in benefits and stripes.””

“E-9 sentenced to 20 months in prison”

 Like

Jay M on January 31, 2011 at 10:03 am

Excellent video Tom!

What is funny is that even the ugliest women act like they are constantly
beating men away with a stick. There is always some need to seem perused all
the time, and it is bothersome hearing and/or reading about it. Even the ugliest
and least productive women have an entitlement syndrome where they feel men
owe them everything.

“But capitalism cannot thrive without some moral and cultural framework to
contain or at least channel its gales, for the essential contradiction of the system
is that it’s bent on producing self-controlled workers yet disinhibited shoppers, and
thus it undermines the self-mastery that it inculcates.”

But freemarket capitalism PROVIDES the moral framework because it is the only
ideology based on voluntary free choice. Any force, fraud, coercion, and theft is
immoral. As far as marriage is concerned both parties should decide the clauses of
their marriage contract, and church and state should stay out of it.

As far as printing money and selling it to other countries goes we should go onto a
barter system and create a parallel currency in America backed by the GDP to
compete with the toxic-debt ridden dollar. We should also abolish the ability of the
private banking cartels to print money. This will prevent countries from being debt
ridden. Furthermore, there is fractional reserve lending, which means that these
private banking cartels can lend 10x more than they actually have.

 Like

Firepower on January 31, 2011 at 3:31 pm

@Mr. C

Wow – Emile Durkheim.

ALL of what we suffer today was already explained by him, long ago. Same with
Weber

Good points – props

 Like

could be anyone on February 1, 2011 at 8:08 pm

best. post. ever.

 Like

Professor Woland on February 2, 2011 at 1:48 am


There once was a chick who picked up on some masculine looking guy at
a bar and brought him home. When he took off his pants she saw his
little winky she started laughing and said, ” who do you think you are
going to please with that pathetic little dick”? He looked at her and smiled, “me”.

 Like

Blog at WordPress.com. WPThemes.


Follow

You might also like