You are on page 1of 2

Page 1 Risk Assessment

PM-AF-133-4
Rev:00
Table 1 Risk Assessment Form (Ultrasound thickness Testing) Date: 31-06-2020

Risk ID Process Potential Hazards Mitigation Plan Severity Basis of Severity Occurrence Basis of Occurrence Risk Score
Rating Rating

Each Operator will be Could have significant impact It usually occur where
Surface finsh not meeting the required
I Surface Preparation informed of the surface 4 of the final measured 3 surface polishing and 12
level as per the standard.
finish importance reading. grinding is difficult.

Very less occurrence


Significant damage to the
To be make sure that as strict monitoring will
equipment can occur. The
II Testing Operator Error( Unaware Operator) only trained operator will 5
measured valued would have
1 be maintained that only 5
perform the job. trained operators
high uncertaininty.
perform any activity.

The occurrence
Part of Training Program. The measured values would
possibility will be there
The operator should be be not accurate and can have
III Testing Misalligned Indenter and Surface 4 4 each time any 16
informed of the possible inherent deviation from the
identation is made.
Error. mean values.
Therefore high.

Part of Training Program. Very less occurrence


The operator should be Will slightly affect the as portable hardness
IV Testing Insufficient Dwell Time 2 2 4
informed of the possible measured values. tester has inherent less
Error. dwell time.

Very Less likely to


Occur. System of
Daily Verification shall be Can have severe effects on
V Machine Out of Calibration 5 1 monitoring of 5
performed. the measured values
equipment calibration in
place.

Table 2 Risk Classification Table – Severity

Rating Severity

Category Description

No significant effect on the Observation/Interpretation/ readings.


1 Trivial

Minor impact effect on the Observation/Interpretation/ readings.


2 Minor

Moderate effect on the Observation/Interpretation/ readings.


3 Moderate

Severeeffect on the Observation/Interpretation/ readings.


4 Major

Massive effect on the observation/Intepretation/Readings


5 Massive

Table 3 Risk Classification Table – Occurrence


The appropriate Officer should sign the Programme of Measures
Rating Occurrence

Category Description Likelihood of


Occurrence (%)
Very low chance (0-5%) in single 0 – 5
1 Very Low
observation/measurement
Low chance (5-10%) in single 5 - 10
2 Low
observation/measurement
Medium chance (10-20%) in single 10 - 20
3 Medium
observation/measurement
High chance (20-50%) in single 20 - 50
4 High
observation/measurement
Greater than 50% in single >50
5 Very High
observation/measurement

Prepared By Approved By

Owais Manzoor Dilip Gaikwad


Table 4 Risk Matrix

V. High 5

High 4

III
Occurrence

Medium 3

Low 2

IV

V. Low 1
V II

Trivial Minor Moderate Major Massive

1 2 3 4 5
Severity

These are considered to be high-level risks requiring priority attention. These risks have the potential to greatly
affect the interpretation/readings and as such should be addressed quickly.

These are medium-level risks requiring action, but are not as critical as a red coded risk.

Green (light and dark green) – These are lowest-level risks and indicate a need for continuing awareness and
monitoring on a regular basis. Whilst they are currently low or minor risks, some have the potential to increase
to medium or even high-level risks and must therefore be regularly monitored and if cost effective mitigation can
be carried out to reduce the risk even further this should be pursued.

Prepared By Approved By
Owais Manzoor Dilip Gaikwad

You might also like