Professional Documents
Culture Documents
James A. Bent
Engineering Department
h P. 0. Box 1026
EXHIBIT A
personnel in their proposal to do the work. and reporting. 'Therefore, to achieve a success-
Contractors and owners have often experienced ful operation, it is essential to keep control
difficulty in having subcontractors properly documents as simple as is possible, without
respond to control and reporting requirements. being excessively time consuming. Physical
Even with this approach of fully detailing progress must be measured by physical quanti-
control and reporting requirements, prior to ties; manhours must be collected to check on
contract award, actual subcontractor performance productivity or forecast manpower requirements;
rarely meets specification. What is promised work in progress needs to be accurately
and what is achieved are often not the same. identified; scope changes must be promptly re-
However, failure to pursue this approach often cognized; labor availability needs to be
results in intolerable situations where periodic constantly evaluated, particularly in remote
measuring of subcontract performance varies jobsites or areas with high concentrations of
widely in accuracy. work.
PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
VALUE WEIGHT ly WEIGHT TARGET EARNED
Activity ($1000: I* COIPL. %co*. WiHRs . MWRS.
MOBILIZATIOI! N .A . -3.5 InO 3.5 j,4On 3,400 - e(
H.A. 32 1:. 0 P,960 2,A70 - 4 #@
BOTTOcl PLATE 2.4
AYIULAR :'ZLD H.A. 2.4 1,370 -90
XT COURSE N.A. 5.8 12 0.7 4,460 .53n - ,*
2ND COURSE H.A. 7.1 7,040 c -80
3RD COURSE H.A. 5.9 h,r)TO
bTH COURSE I7.A. 5. 1 5,920
5x1 COURSS H.A. 4.3 5,92C =-4f -70
hT!I COURSE 1J.A. 3.3 s,fi4o
7TH COURSE H.6. r
_. 5,540 . -40
8TII COURSZ N.A. 2. 5,F;40 #
9TI! couRsc ?.A. 2.2 5,540
lOTI! COURS, "- A ,
Ll. 1.7 5,763
ROOF H.A. 32. i 26,140
TES'X:IG I!.A. 1. . 9 5 ,\'OO
PAIH~I'IC W. A . 5.7 26,200
DEMOBILIZATIOF 1J.A. 1.5 ? ,OOC
30
-20
-10
This is an efficient visual tool for group in the field to adequately measure
scope trending and evaluating schedule per- and evaluate progress. Field measurement can
formance, can be used for many categories of be greatly facilitated when home office
work, particularly the "bulks". (Also good quantity takeoffs are included on the specific
for engineering; concrete drawings, piping drawings at construction issue. It is then
isometrics and structural steel.) a relatively simple matter in the field, as the
work is completed, to use these quantities for
An additional technique would be to payment and measurement of progress together
collate the craft direct manhours to the with addition of field drawings changes as
quantity and evaluate performance on a unit construction proceeds.
manhour basis. This also provides his-
torical experience for estimating or operat- To overcome this home office lack of
ing evaluation of other similar projects. good quantity takeoffs, many contractors
have instituted a field quantity takeoff
system. As construction drawings are re-
MEASUREMENT ceived at the jobsite, cost engineers and
quantity surveyors will take off quantities
The key element in the measuring of and maintain a total scope buildup to com-
subcontracts is quantities. This is parti- pletion of engineering. This does provide
cularly true not only for unit price sub- for a proper assessment of scope, but it does
contracts but also for lump sum subcontracts mean that overall construction progress
which need to be evaluated for progress on cannot be fully evaluated until these field
a quantity basis. takeoffs are completed. This takes time and
often the project is many months into con-
Many contractors do not carry out quantity struction before overall progress can be
takeoffs during the engineering pnase as drawings accurately measured.
are completed for construction issue. This
can lead to a poor estimate of the scope and It is important that field measurement
can cause serious problems for the construction of work in progress be recorded properly on
24
REPORT NO.
OUANTITY PROGRESS REPORT
PERIOD ENDING
EXHIBIT D
27
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
to "buying" the work with a low bid, this can
lead to schedule and cost problems for the
entire project. For direct hire work measuring
labor productivity resolves this problem. PERFOFMANCE FACTOR - CONTRACT BILLINGS - $ PER M.H.
(LABOR) MANHOURS EXPENDED
Direct hire techniques cannot as readily be used
to measure subcontracts. When this performance
evaluation technique is properly used, it can
provide early warning of potential problems. ASSESS SUBC"NTR4CT"RS OPERATIONAL COST, BY BUILDING UP FIELD COSTS,
EQUIPMENT COSTS, OVERHEAD ETC. "NT" THE BASE LABOR COST.
This technique has been used on large and
small projects over the past ten years and has
successfully provided an early warning system = ALL-IN COST = $ PER H.H.
for cost exposure and schedule slippage. Early
warning provides time to evaluate actions
which might alleviate the subcontract situa-
tion or at least provide for minimum schedule . ENSURE THAT BILLINGS TRULY REPRESENT THE WORK ACCOMPLISHED.
slippage if cost adaition is inescapable.
. ENSURE T"AT MANHOUR REPORT IS ACCURATE.
Exhibit L - Subcontractor Performance . IF SUBCONTRACT HAS A MATERIAL SUPPLY, EVALUATE FOR PROFIT ON
MATERIAL TO ADD T" PROFIT/LOSS OF LABOR ELEMENT.
This is a simple tabulation of financial
performance per manhour of each subcontract.
In conjunction with the performance curve
shown on the subcontractor's status report EFFICIENCY = PERFORMANCE FACTOR
ALL-IN COST
(Exhibit D), this data can provide a good
basis for overall cost prediction.
Exhibit M - Procedure for Field Changes and IF TXE CUERTLATIVB EFFICIENCY IS LESS THAN 1.0 THE SUBCONTRACTOR
Extra Work IS IN A LABOR LOSS POSITION.
SUBCONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE
--_----__--- -. _
-----~ -..
--a.-..- -.
-- i--. -~--._
.- .- .
. _.._.,_ Ir -+,-
, 4 i- sEXHIBIT L ..-_ ._ .
. . _. , __ j __ _ i ---._ - . .. i .I.~ -._ .~_ . .
28
PlELD CHAIICES-SUB CONTF.ACTORS-PROCEDURE
mitted, and recorded in a" efficient manner designed co minimize the loss
3. mange Requested By:
of time and extra cases associated with each such change.
4. Field cban~es of costs less fha" $1,000 do "oC require Prior """e=
5. The Field Chance Order (FCO) should be submicced in duplicate so that construction. Attached to this written pro-
cedure is a sample of a field change order
one form may be retained by owner.
form which has been successfully used on
6. on completion of viork, FCO will be re-subnitted with items five (5) current projects.
and six (6) filled in and any supporting cost back-up should estimated
The objective of this provedure is to
and actual cost differ.
identify all changes from approved drawings,
7. -It is appreciared that possible urgency of tile proposed work- may not evaluate cost and schedule impact and then
give sufficient eime fnr a fornal bid to be solicited, so the "Esfimated
authorize the work.
Bare Cost" (item 4) will be a co"tracf"r "Guesstimate." Oftentimes, field changes and extra
8. Particular care should be give" to irem eight (8) - Affect on works are required on an urgent basis, how-
ever, an efficient estimating and authoriza-
Schedule - 50 that ProPer ns~essment may be made of the Proposed change.
tion procedure need not necessarily delay
9. -recommended that the_FCO "unberi"E sysfem be tied back- to the cost the work. Too often owners receive requests
schedule geographical area, and that the "umber indicate the "umber of on a crash basis where little thought has been
given to need or cost impact of this change.
changes in that area as well as the tocal "umber of cha"ges...i.e., if
a process unit - l/1/1. Should the change cover more than one unit or The intent of this paper on scheduling and
controlling construction subcontracts is to
area the" prefix "P" for ""sites and "S" for Offsites could be used.
present pragmatic control techniques and methods
for cost and schedule evaluations. Effective
control of subcontracts is demanding and
EXHIBIT M requires personnel experienced in business
matters, cost analysis and schedule evaluation.
The best techniques in the world will not insure
an efficient subcontract control operation un-
less qualified personnel are assigned to the
task.
29