RAPID ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING RESOURCES

Is the LR Material... YES NO Cannot be determined

1. Connected and relevant to the √

MELCs?

2. Appropriate to the grade level

and learner characteristics in √
terms of language, activities?

3. easy to reproduce and/or

disseminate? √

4. from a credible source/author? √

5. culture- and gender-fair? √

6. free from red flags on possible

copyright and plagiarism issues? √

7. the layout and format easy to

read and pleasing to the eyes? √

Reflection Questions:
1. Was the material able to meet all the requirements?
Yes, the material was able to meet all the requirement because it was thoroughly checked and has
undergone evaluation by the DepEd personnel.

2. Were there any questions in the assessment tool where you answered “No” or “Cannot Be
Determined”? What decision will you make on the LR material? Why?
I haven’t answered “No” or “Cannot Be Determined” in the assessment tool since as I personally
checked the printed modules, it was free from biases and discriminations. The lay out is friendly to
the eyes and the graphic designs will not cause distraction to the eyes of the learner.
3. Are there other aspects of the material not covered by the tool but still need to be assessed?
Specify which aspect/s.
On the assessment part, the assessment must not only be on the knowledge level but should also
include analysis and the higher order thinking skills of the learner, however the assessment must
not be too much so the learner can still have a time for himself.
4. How does this exercise help you in picking the right and appropriate LRs for your lesson and your
learners?
This exercise helped me because it gives me a chance to review again the content of module that
has to be delivered to the learner and to check if there are points to be enhanced or to be deleted to
avoid misconception to the students.

Prepared by:

Jenny Ann E. Apla-on

Teacher 1

RAPID ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING RESOURCES Non-DepEd Learning Portal

 Is the LR Material... YES NO Cannot be determined

1. Connected and relevant to the √

MELCs?

2. Appropriate to the grade level and

learner characteristics in terms of √
language, activities?

3. easy to reproduce and/or

disseminate? √

4. from a credible source/author? √

5. culture- and gender-fair? √

6. free from red flags on possible

copyright and plagiarism issues? √

7. the layout and format easy to read

and pleasing to the eyes? √

Reflection Questions:
5. Was the material able to meet all the requirements?
No, because from the author himself, he was not connected to the DepEd since it was a foreign
author and his work was not validated by the DepEd Personnel.

6. Were there any questions in the assessment tool where you answered “No” or “Cannot Be
Determined”? What decision will you make on the LR material? Why?
I haven’t answered “No” or “Cannot Be Determined” in the assessment tool since the sample
assessment can be answered by way of studying well the lesson given.
7. Are there other aspects of the material not covered by the tool but still need to be assessed?
Specify which aspect/s.
I think, an improvement should be done on the assessment part since it is too advance for the level
of some students, a little modification will be needed considering their level of understanding.
8. How does this exercise help you in picking the right and appropriate LRs for your lesson and your
learners?
This exercise helped me to select an appropriate LR portal that is valid and could support the
assessment tool that is given to the students.

Prepared by:

Jenny Ann E. Apla-on

Teacher 1