Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEH 355
Final Paper
The world is full of tragedy and tragic heroes who only sometimes get to taste true
freedom. That is only the gist of what categorizes a film as gangster genre. According to Thomas
Schatz, “…the genre exists sort of tacit contract between filmmakers and audience; the film
genre is an actual event that honors such a contract”. He further explains, “To discuss a Western
genre is to address neither a single Western film nor even all Westerns, but rather that system of
conventions which identifies Western films as such”. The gangster genre is no different because
the movies that are identified as a gangster genre honor its conventions and codes.
In 1931, one of the three gangster classics was released in theaters and it went by Little
Caesar. The film stared a hot headed cunning street tough named Rico. Rico quickly became
friendly with a city gang, took advantage of his skills and smarts to eventually pull off a heist
and take the chair of the local mob boss. He makes it to the top just like he knew he would but
his glory would not last long. In the classical gangster film, the hero always loses. The moral to
the story, crime always pays. Rico, starts to become a target to other gangs and has been under
Eventually he attempts to kill his beloved friend, changes his mind and almost gets caught by the
law. An on the run Rico, eventually lets his ego get in the way of survival and dies by the hands
of the cops who were on his tail. This was the end of Rico and no longer will he be able to assert
pretty astounding to think that three films, close in proximity with released dates, carried out
similar gangster genre conventions that future filmmakers honor to this day. Little Caesar
featured a rising star who’s success ended up being his downfall. The gangster is alienated from
society therefore he lives just the same as he dies; alone. Robert Warshow states, “No convention
of the gangster film is more strongly established than this; it is dangerous to be alone. And yet
the very conditions of success make it impossible for it to alone, for success is always the
automatically arouses hatred; the successful man is an outlaw”. In all of the classic films, the
gangster ends up trapped by the causes of his actions and dies alone. This trope is honored
The reality of the urban criminal is that they will always be trapped with no chance of
truly succeeding. The use of their “left-handed” methods will inevitably place them in a corner
with no where to go. The pursuit to freedom in an immoral and dark world is a hopeless fight in
gangster noir, most notably White Heat. Fran Mason articulates this idea by stating, “This
tendency in noir to identify the failures of American ideology without actually criticizing the
ideology itself, or offering any solutions, can be seen as one of its most important elements. One
way of describing noir is to see it as an articulation of a crisis in modernity and its ideologies and
economic systems, but one that is less a reflection of an actual crisis in modernity than a
construction of it”. The gangster noir film can be seen as a diagnosis of the modern world within
“The gangster noir hero, on the other hand, is part of a process of the deterritorialization
in which his identity is not expressed through the extension across space, but dissipated by it,
existing in ‘liminal uncertainty’”(Warshow 78). The gangster noir hero, the space he controls
and his existence is taken away throughout the film concluding with his/her downfall. Cody
Jarrett, the alienated, psychologically disturbed, mamas boy and leader of a small heist crew
loses it all after being double-crossed by Hank Fallon, an undercover cop who was assigned to
win over Jarrett’s trust. Getting incarcerated, losing the loyalty of his wife to one his own crew
members, and the loyalty of the rest of his crew members put Jarrett in tight corner. In the tight
space he believed he was controlling, Jarrett made mistakes which ended in his explosive demise
The gangster genre evolves and adapts to the times as the American conscious goes to
massive changes. The 60’s was an era of great historical changes like the Civil Rights
Movement, free love and the rise of counter-cultures. Filmmakers like Arthur Penn with his
modern gangster film, Bonnie and Clyde gave acknowledgement to the rising American counter
Martin Scorsese adds new elements to the gangster genre with his approach to the
life of a mobster with his film, Goodfellas, a postmodern expression of the American
underground mob society. Scorsese, tells a story of Henry Hill, a guy who started out working
for mobsters doing small jobs like parking their cars to eventually become a close respected
member of the society. The film expresses a postmodernist interpretation of the American dream,
a traditional trope of the gangster genre. The American dream is not the family and white picket
fence to Henry. It’s doing whatever you want including parking wherever you want, life was like
Henry did not have the disturbing mentality of the people he surrounded himself with, but
he was seduced by the perks of the lifestyle which ended up catching up to him. The modern
1970s landscape, the control and freedoms the mobster has over the environment was much more
detailed than most earlier films. Henry’s tragic flaw that ended him was his desire for more.
More money, more property, more drugs and more woman. He did not have enough and ended
up settling for very little in the end. There is always that same moral lesson that echoes
throughout all of the violent gangster genre films, crime always pays.