You are on page 1of 1

SOUTH DHAHRAN HOME OWNERSHIP PROJECT

Request For Information (RFI)

RFI #: 01/16/00014/RFI/0103 Rev #:00 Date: 21-Aug-19

Contractor: Ashi and Bushnag Co. Ltd Contract No.: 6600042949


Contract Title: SDHO Private School
Stru Plu HVA Infr LndSc Other
✘ Arch. FF Elec.
Disipline: c. mb. C a. p. ____________

RFI Title: TENSILE FABRIC PLAYGROUNDS AND KG AREA


RFI Description:

We have a conflict in tensile fabric of playgrounds area (boys and girls school), and also Girls KG area, between IFC drawings and
specification.
IFC drawings (HA-176440-001, HA-176412-001, HA-176398-001) Shown tensile as teflon fabric, but in specification (GEN-E0004-
DIV13,Sec 133100, 1.01 -A) it’s mentioned in general description (1.01) as (Teflon coated glass roof fabric OR High Density
Polyethylene knitted fabric), also in the same specification it’s mentioned in roof covering (2.02-B) as (High Density Polyethylene
knitted fabric).
ABC and the manufacturer may ask your attention that HDPE is not suitable for tensile at all, for its weakness in wrap and weft tensile
strength.
According to the manufacturer comparison chart between HDPE, PVC and PTFE (see attached comaprision chart and 3 data sheets).
ABC and according to manufacturer recommendation for our project status, propose to use PVC (polyvinyl chloride) which have more
possitive points than the other fabric, such as compatibility with flame retardant (NFPA 701 Test 2) as requested in IFC drawing, (UV
Transmission 0%) and (Solar transmittance (TS): 4%), and for easy maintenance, because any damaged part in future could be
replaced by new one separately than all other parts,etc...

HA-176440-001, HA-176412-001, HA-176398-001, GEN-E0004 DIV13 3 OF 7, Comparison chart - 3 data sheets


Attachements:

Initiator: Tech. Engineer - Abdulmohsin.A.Sanki Signature: Date: 8/21/2019

8/21/2019
Engineering Manager - Engr.Mohammed Rassem Signature: Date:

For Contractor:
Project Manager - Engr.Ahmad Farouk Signature: Date: 8/21/2019

Distribution: ✘ SAPMT ✘ PMT / CMT

Reviewed for General Acceptance. This review does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibility for making the work conform to the requirements of the Contract

Response:

For PMT/CMT
Name: Signature: Date:
For SAPMT
Name: Signature: Date:

Note: This form cannot modify contract cost or time, if contractor belives that response creates a change in scope and effecting cost and/or time, contractor should submit a "Request for Change"

Response Received:
For Contractor:
Name: Signature: Date:

Distribution: ✘ SAPMT ✘ PMT / CMT

524556681.xlsx Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

You might also like