IV.Dimensionarea stalpilor.

Dimesionarea stalpului de mijloc al cadrului transversal intermediar de

la parter .
Caracteristici geometrice si de rezistenta.

Din combinația seismică SLU-nedis rezultă:

My.Ed ≔ 721 ⋅

VEd ≔ 118

Mz.Ed ≔ 50 ⋅

NEd ≔ 1054

Caracteristicile profilului HEB 600:

4 3 2
h ≔ 600 Iz ≔ 13530 ⋅ 10 4 Wpl.y ≔ 6425 ⋅ 10 3 A ≔ 270 ⋅ 10 2

4 3
b ≔ 300 It ≔ 667.2 ⋅ 10 4 Wpl.z ≔ 1391 ⋅ 10 3 r ≔ 27

6 3
tw ≔ 15.5 Iw ≔ 10970 ⋅ 10 9 Wel.y ≔ 5701 ⋅ 10 3 iy ≔ 25.17 ⋅ 10

4 3
tf ≔ 30 Iy ≔ 171000 ⋅ 10 4 Wel.z ≔ 902 ⋅ 10 3 iz ≔ 7.08 ⋅ 10

het ≔ 3.8 E ≔ 210000 ――

2
fy ≔ 355 ――
2
fu ≔ 510 ――
2
G ≔ 80770 ――
2

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
235 ―― 2 γm0 ≔ 1.0 hw ≔ 540
ε≔ ――――= 0.814 γm1 ≔ 1.0
fy γm2 ≔ 1.25
 2.Determinarea clasei de sectiune.

a.Talpi in consola supuse la compresiune.

((b − 2 ⋅ r − tw))
c ≔ ――――― = 115.25
2
c c
―= 3.842 9 ⋅ ε = 7.323 ―< 9 ⋅ ε -clasa 1
tf tf
b.Inima supusa la incovoiere cu forta axiala.

dw ≔ h − 2 ⋅ ((tf + r)) = 486 c ≔ dw

NEd ⎛⎝dw + dN⎞⎠
dN ≔ ―― = 191.549 α ≔ ――― = 0.697
tw ⋅ fy 2 ⋅ dw

c 396 ⋅ ε c 396 ⋅ ε
― = 31.355 α > 0.5 ―――= 39.965 ― < ――― -clasa 1
tw 13 ⋅ α − 1 tw 13 ⋅ α − 1

3.Verificari din rezistenta.

a.Verificare la forta axiala.

A ⋅ fy NEd
Nc.Rd ≔ ――= 9585 ――= 0.11 0.11 < 1.0
γm0 Nc.Rd
Cond: NEd ≤ 0.25 ⋅ Nc.Rd 0.25 ⋅ Nc.Rd = 2396.25 1054 ≤ 2396.25
fy fy
NEd ≤ 0.5 ⋅ hw ⋅ tw ⋅ ―― 0.5 ⋅ hw ⋅ tw ⋅ ―― = 1485.675 1054 ≤ 1485.675
γm0 γm0
Conditile fiind respectate forta axiala de compresiune NEd nu infuenteaza
valoarea momentului rezistent plastic.

b.Verificare la forta taietoare.

2
AV ≔ A − 2 ⋅ b ⋅ tf + ((tw + 2 ⋅ r)) ⋅ tf = 11085

⎛ fy ⎞
AV ⋅ ⎜―― ⎟
⎜⎝ ‾‾
3 ⎟⎠
Vpl.Rd ≔ ―――― = 2271.974 Vc.Rd ≔ Vpl.Rd
γm0

VEd
Cond: ――= 0.052 0.052 < 0.5 VEd nu influențează Mpl.Rd , nu este necesară
Vc.Rd verificarea la incovoiere cu forfecare.
c.Verificare la moment incovoietor.
fy
Mpl.Rd ≔ Wpl.y ⋅ ―― = 2280.875 ⋅ -clasa 1 Mc.Rd ≔ Mpl.Rd
γm0

My.Ed
――= 0.316 0.316 < 1.0
Mc.Rd
4.Verificari din stabilitate.

a.Verificarea de stabilitate la compresiune pura.

NEd
――≤ 1.0
Nb.Rd
αcr ≔ 30.2 αcr > 15 Str. nu este sensibilă la efectele de ordin 2 - noduri fixe

Lcry ≔ 0.7 ⋅ het = 2.66 Lcrz ≔ Lcry

Iy 2
Iz 2
Ncry ≔ ――― ⋅E⋅ = 500900.975 Ncrz ≔ ――― ⋅E⋅ = 39632.691
⎛⎝Lcry⎞⎠ 2 ⎛⎝Lcrz⎞⎠ 2

‾‾‾‾‾
A ⋅ fy ‾‾‾‾‾
A ⋅ fy
λy ≔ ――= 0.138 λz ≔ ――= 0.492
Ncry Ncrz
Factor de imperfecțiune dupa axa y: αy ≔ 0.21
h h
―= 2 ―> 1.2
b b Factor de imperfecțiune dupa axa z: αz ≔ 0.34
tf = 30 tf < 40 mm

ϕy ≔ 0.5 ⎛⎝1 + αy ⋅ ⎛⎝λy − 0.2⎞⎠ + ⎛⎝λy⎞⎠ 2 ⎞⎠ = 0.503

ϕz ≔ 0.5 ⎛⎝1 + αz ⋅ ⎛⎝λz − 0.2⎞⎠ + ⎛⎝λz⎞⎠ 2 ⎞⎠ = 0.671

1 1
χy ≔ ―――――― = 1.013 χz ≔ ――――― = 0.888
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
2
ϕy + ϕy − λy 2
ϕz + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
ϕ z 2 − λz 2
A ⋅ fy A ⋅ fy
Nb.Rd.y ≔ χy ⋅ ――= 9713.279 Nb.Rd.z ≔ χz ⋅ ――= 8509.938
γm1 γm1

NEd NEd
――― = 0.109 ――― = 0.124
Nb.Rd.y Nb.Rd.z
 b.Verificarea de stabilitate la incovoiere-rasucire.

Din programul de calcul SAP2000: MEd.1 ≔ 267 ⋅ MEd.2 ≔ 8.2 ⋅

My.Ed h
――≤ 1.0 Lcry ≔ 0.7 ⋅ het = 2.66 Lcrz ≔ Lcry C1 ≔ 2.33 zg ≔ ―
Mb.Rd C2 ≔ 0 2

−MEd.1 −MEd.2
ψy ≔ ――― = −0.37 ψz ≔ ――― = −0.164 kw ≔ 1.0 k ≔ 1.0
My.Ed Mz.Ed

2
⎛ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
2 ⎞
⋅ E ⋅ Iz ⎜ ⎛ k ⎞ 2 Iw ⎛⎝k ⋅ Lcry⎞⎠ ⋅ G ⋅ It 2 ⎟
Mcr ≔ C1 ―――― ⋅ ⎜―⎟ ⋅ ―+ ――――― + ⎛⎝C2 ⋅ zg⎞⎠ − C2 ⋅ zg⎟ = 28413.865 ⋅
2 ⎜ 2
⎛⎝k ⋅ Lcry⎞⎠ ⎝ ⎝ kw ⎠ I z ⋅ E ⋅ Iz ⎠

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Wpl.y ⋅ fy
λLT ≔ ―――= 0.283 λLT >0.4 Trebuie facut verificare la stabilitate
Mcr

h h
―= 2 ―< 2 Profil laminat,curba B: factorul de imperfecțiune
b b αLT ≔ 0.34

β ≔ 0.75 λLT.0 ≔ 0.4

ϕLT ≔ ⎛⎝0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝1 + αLT ⋅ ⎛⎝λLT − λLT.0⎞⎠ + β ⋅ ⎛⎝λLT⎞⎠ 2 ⎞⎠⎞⎠ = 0.51

1 1 1
χLT ≔ ――――――――― = 1.044 ―― = 0.917 χLT < 1 χLT < ――
ϕLT + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛⎝ϕLT⎞⎠ 2 − β ⋅ ⎛⎝λLT⎞⎠ 2 χLT 2 λLT 2

1 ⎛ 2⎞
kc ≔ ―――――= 0.689 f ≔ 1 − 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝1 − kc⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎝1 − 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝λLT − 0.8⎞⎠ ⎠ = 0.927 f ≤ 1.0
1.33 − 0.33 ⋅ ψy

⎛ χLT ⎞ χLT
χLT.mod ≔ min ⎜―― , 1.0⎟ = 1 ―― = 1.126 χLT.final ≔ min ⎛⎝χLT.mod , χLT⎞⎠ = 1
⎝ f ⎠ f

fy
Mb.Rd ≔ χLT.final ⋅ Wpl.y ⋅ ―― = 2280.875 ⋅
γm1

My.Ed
――= 0.316 0.316 < 1
Mb.Rd
c.Verificarea de stabilitate la interactiunea moment incovoietor-forta
axiala.
NEd My.Ed Mz.Ed
―――+ kyy ⋅ ――――+ kyz ⋅ ――― ≤ 1.0
χy ⋅ NRk χLT ⋅ My.Rk Mz.Rk
――― ―――― ――
γm1 γm1 γm1
NEd My.Ed Mz.Ed
―――+ kzy ⋅ ――――+ kzz ⋅ ――― ≤ 1.0
χz ⋅ NRk χLT ⋅ My.Rk Mz.Rk
――― ―――― ――
γm1 γm1 γm1

Lcry ≔ 0.7 ⋅ het = 2.66 Lcrz ≔ Lcry het ≔ 3.8

Factori de reducere a rezistentei din compresiune pura.

1 1
χy ≔ ―――――― = 1.013 χz ≔ ――――― = 0.888
ϕy + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
ϕy 2 − λy 2 ϕz + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
ϕ z 2 − λz 2

Factori de reducere a rezistentei din incovoiere cu rasucire.

Lcr.LT ≔ Lcrz Lcr.LT ≔ Lcry Lcry ≔ 0.7 ⋅ het = 2.66

1
χLT ≔ ――――――――― = 1.044
ϕLT + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛⎝ϕLT⎞⎠ 2 − β ⋅ ⎛⎝λLT⎞⎠ 2

Modificarea coeficientului de reducere χLT ,in functie de aliura diagramei de

moment incovoietor.
−MEd.1 −MEd.2
ψy ≔ ――― = −0.37 ψz ≔ ――― = −0.164
My.Ed Mz.Ed

1 ⎛ 2⎞
kc ≔ ―――――= 0.689 f ≔ 1 − 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝1 − kc⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎝1 − 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝λLT − 0.8⎞⎠ ⎠ = 0.927 f ≤ 1.0
1.33 − 0.33 ⋅ ψy

⎛ χLT ⎞ χLT
χLT.mod ≔ min ⎜―― , 1.0⎟ = 1 ―― = 1.126 χLT.final ≔ min ⎛⎝χLT.mod , χLT⎞⎠ = 1
⎝ f ⎠ f
Calculu factorilor de interactiune conform EN 1993-1-1,Anex A.
NEd NEd
1 − ―― 1 − ――
Ncry Ncrz
μy ≔ ――――= 1 μz ≔ ――――= 0.997
NEd NEd
1 − χy ⋅ ―― 1 − χz ⋅ ――
Ncry Ncrz
⎛ Wpl.y ⎞ ⎛ Wpl.z ⎞
Wy ≔ min ⎜1.5 , ――⎟ = 1.127 Wz ≔ min ⎜1.5 , ――⎟ = 1.5
⎝ Wel.y ⎠ ⎝ Wel.z ⎠

NRk ≔ fy ⋅ A = 9585

fy ⋅ Wpl.y fy ⋅ Wpl.z
My.Rk ≔ ―――= 2280.875 ⋅ Mz.Rk ≔ ―――= 493.805 ⋅
γm1 γm1

NEd ⎛ It ⎞
npl ≔ ――= 0.11 aLT ≔ max ⎜0 , 1 − ―⎟ = 0.996
NRk ⎝ Iy ⎠
――
γm1
My.Ed A
λmax ≔ max ⎛⎝λy , λz⎞⎠ = 0.492 εy ≔ ――⋅ ――= 3.24
NEd Wel.y

Mcr ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Wpl.y ⋅ fy
Mcr.0 ≔ ―― = 12194.792 ⋅ λ0 ≔ ―――= 0.432
C1 Mcr.0

i0 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
iy 2 + iz 2 = 261.468 Lcr.LT ≔ Lcrz Lcr.LT ≔ Lcry

1 ⎛ ⋅ E ⋅ Iw ⎞
2

Ncr.T ≔ ―― ⋅ ⎜G ⋅ It + ―――― ⎟ = 54885.55 Ncr.TF ≔ Ncr.T - sectiune dublu

i0 2 ⎜⎝ Lcr.LT 2 ⎟⎠ simetrica

4 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛ NEd ⎞ ⎛ NEd ⎞
λ0.lim ≔ 0.2 ⋅ ‾‾‾
C1 ⋅ ⎜1 − ―― ⎟ ⋅ ⎜1 − ――― ⎟ = 0.302
⎝ Ncrz ⎠ ⎝ Ncr.TF ⎠

NEd −MEd.1
Cmy.o ≔ 0.79 + 0.21 ⋅ ψy + 0.36 ⋅ ⎛⎝ψy − 0.33⎞⎠ ⋅ ―― = 0.712 ψy ≔ ――― = −0.37
Ncry My.Ed

NEd −MEd.2
Cmz.o ≔ 0.79 + 0.21 ⋅ ψz + 0.36 ⋅ ⎛⎝ψz − 0.33⎞⎠ ⋅ ―― = 0.751 ψz ≔ ――― = −0.164
Ncrz Mz.Ed
 ‾‾
εy ⋅ aLT
Cmy ≔ Cmy.o + ⎛⎝1 − Cmy.o⎞⎠ ⋅ ―――― = 0.897
λ0 > λ0.lim − formulele 1 + ‾‾
εy ⋅ aLT

Cmz ≔ Cmz.o = 0.751

⎛ aLT ⎞
CmLT ≔ max ⎜1 , Cmy 2 ⋅ ―――――――― ⎟=1
⎜ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛ NEd ⎞ ⎛ NEd ⎞ ⎟
⎜ ⎜1 − ―― ⎟ ⋅ ⎜1 − ――⎟ ⎟
⎝ ⎝ Ncrz ⎠ ⎝ Ncr.T ⎠ ⎠
My.Ed Mz.Ed
bLT ≔ 0.5 ⋅ aLT ⋅ λ0 2 ⋅ ――――⋅ ――― = 0.003
χLT ⋅ My.Rk Mz.Rk
――――――
γm1 γm1
λ0 2 My.Ed
cLT ≔ 10 ⋅ aLT ⋅ ――― 4
⋅ ――――― = 0.124
5 + λz Cmy ⋅ χLT ⋅ My.Rk

λ0 2 My.Ed Mz.Ed
dLT ≔ 2 ⋅ aLT ⋅ ――― 4
⋅ ――――― ⋅ ―――― = 0.107
0.1 + λz Cmy ⋅ χLT ⋅ My.Rk Cmz ⋅ Mz.Rk

λ0 2 My.Ed
eLT ≔ 1.7 ⋅ aLT ⋅ ――― 4
⋅ ――――― = 0.675
0.1 + λz Cmy ⋅ χLT ⋅ My.Rk

⎛ ⎛⎛ 1.6 1.6 ⎞ ⎞ Wel.y ⎞

Cyy ≔ max ⎜1 + ⎛⎝Wy − 1⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜⎜2 − ―― ⋅ Cmy 2 ⋅ λmax − ―― ⋅ Cmy 2 ⋅ λmax 2 ⎟ ⋅ npl − bLT⎟ , ――⎟ = 1.016
⎝ ⎝⎝ Wy Wy ⎠ ⎠ Wpl.y ⎠
⎛⎛ ⎛ Cmz 2 ⋅ λmax 2 ⎞ ⎞ Wz Wel.z ⎞
‾‾‾‾
Cyz ≔ max ⎜⎜1 + ⎛⎝Wz − 1⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜2 − 14 ⋅ ―――― ⎟ ⋅ npl − cLT⎟ , 0.6 ⋅ ―― ⋅ ――⎟ = 0.972
⎜⎝⎜⎝ ⎜⎝ Wz 5 ⎟⎠ ⎟⎠ Wy Wpl.z ⎟⎠
⎛⎛ ⎛ Cmy 2 ⋅ λmax 2 ⎞ ⎞ Wy Wel.y ⎞
‾‾‾‾
Czy ≔ max ⎜⎜1 + ⎛⎝Wy − 1⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜2 − 14 ⋅ ―――― ⎟ ⋅ npl − dLT⎟ , 0.6 ⋅ ―― ⋅ ――⎟ = 0.9
⎜⎝⎜⎝ ⎜⎝ Wy 5 ⎟⎠ ⎟⎠ Wz Wpl.y ⎟⎠

⎛ ⎛⎛ 1.6 1.6 ⎞ ⎞ Wel.z ⎞

Czz ≔ max ⎜1 + ⎛⎝Wz − 1⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜⎜2 − ―― ⋅ Cmz 2 ⋅ λmax − ―― ⋅ Cmz 2 ⋅ λmax 2 ⎟ ⋅ npl − eLT⎟ , ――⎟ = 0.748
⎝ ⎝⎝ Wz Wz ⎠ ⎠ Wpl.z ⎠

μy 1
kyy ≔ Cmy ⋅ CmLT ⋅ ―――⋅ ―― = 0.885
NEd Cyy
1 − ――
Ncry

μz 1 ‾‾‾‾
Wy
kzy ≔ Cmy ⋅ CmLT ⋅ ―――⋅ ―― ⋅ 0.6 ⋅ ―― = 0.518
NEd Czy Wz
1 − ――
Ncry
 μy 1 ‾‾‾‾
Wz
kyz ≔ Cmz ⋅ ―――⋅ ―― ⋅ 0.6 ⋅ ―― = 0.549
NEd Cyz Wy
1 − ――
Ncrz
μz 1
kzz ≔ Cmz ⋅ ―――⋅ ―― = 1.027
NEd Czz
1 − ――
Ncrz
NEd My.Ed Mz.Ed
―――+ kyy ⋅ ――――+ kyz ⋅ ――― = 0.432 0.432 ≤ 1.0
χy ⋅ NRk χLT ⋅ My.Rk Mz.Rk
――― ―――― ――
γm1 γm1 γm1
NEd My.Ed Mz.Ed
―――+ kzy ⋅ ――――+ kzz ⋅ ――― = 0.385 0.385 ≤ 1.0
χz ⋅ NRk χLT ⋅ My.Rk Mz.Rk
――― ―――― ――
γm1 γm1 γm1