UUM 523E Advanced Flight Dynamics Assignment 3 (Trim Conditions)

UUM 523E Advanced Flight Dynamics Assignment 3
(Trim Conditions)
Çağrı Ege Altunkaya 110160104

Yusuf Sıncak 518191032
Cansu Yıkılmaz 110160107
26 December 2020
1.a.
The aircraft was tried to be trimmed in the values given in the table above each conditions.
The trim result made under these conditions is given in the two tables for conditions. The first
table shows the values that the aircraft's control commands should have. The second table
shows trim the values of the aircraft.
1.a.i.
Trim Conditions:
Velocity(Mach) Altitude(ft) Gamma(deg) Phi(deg)
0.6 0 0 0
Trim Results:
Table-1. Control Deflections

Horizontal Aileron(deg) Rudder(deg) Throttle(per) Leading Edge Speed
Tail(deg) Flap(deg) Brake(deg)
-0.6119 -8.2385e-10 -4.197e-09 23.5 0.009 0
Table-2. States
Alpha(deg) Beta(deg) Gamma(deg) Velocity(m/s)
0.5137 0 0 204.17
Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

0.5137 2.9539e-07 0
P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

0 0 0
North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

0 0 0
Simulation Results
Şekil 1 - Alpha, Beta and Gamma
Şekil 2 - Phi and Psi

Şekil 3 - Velocity
Şekil 4 – Altitude
Şekil 5 - 3D Aircraft Trajectory
1.a.ii.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0
Trim Results:

-0.5180 1.9733e-09 3.7547e-09 21.9813 1.1532 0
Table-4. States
1.4375 0 0 197.03

1.4375 2.6929e-08 0

0 0 0

0 0 3048
Simulation Results
Şekil 6 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 8 - Velocity
Şekil 9 - Altitude
1.a.iii.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 20000 0 0
Trim Results:

-0.4073 5.8221e-08 3.2174e-07 23.0549 3.1826 0
Table-6. States
2.9082 0 0 189.6215

2.9082 -2.3252e-05 0

0 0 0

0 0 6096
Simulation Results

Şekil 13 – Velocity
1.a.iv.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 30000 0 0
Trim Results:

-0.2748 3.7462e-08 1.7728e-07 29.5261 6.4727 0
Table-8. States
5.2923 0 0 181.9064

5.2923 -2.0068e-07 0

0 0 0

0 0 9144
Simulation Results

1.a.v.
Trim Conditions:
0.3 3000 -3 0
Trim Results:

-0.5489 4.8488e-09 6.2598e-09 6.1629 11.1851 0
Table-10. States
7.4676 0 -3.0 101.0311

4.4676 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 914.4
Simulation Results
Şekil 21 - Phi, Theta and Gamma

1.a.vi.
Trim Conditions:
0.5 3000 10 0
Trim Results:

-0.584 -2.0404e-08 -9.383e-08 38.9108 2.3449 0
Table-12. States
1.7962 0 10.0 168.3852

11.7962 -4.2518e-07 0

0 0 0

0 0 914.4
Simulation Results

Comment:
When the results are examined, it is seen that the aircraft can be trimmed and perform straight
flight under these conditions. When the trim results are taken and given to the nonlinear
Simulink model as the starting condition, it is seen that the aircraft continues at that trim
point. This proves that this trim point is correct for the aircraft.
1.b.
The trim code prepared for the special case has been compiled and its comparison with the
first trim condition is given in the tables below. In addition, the results obtained by feeding
the results obtained with this trim code to the Simulink model are plotted on the graphics.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 0 0 0
Trim Results:

Horizontal Aileron Rudder Throttle Leading Speed
Tail (deg) (deg) (deg) (per) Edge Flap Brake
(deg) (deg)
Special -0.6179 0.1087 -1.0917 23.4601 0 0
Generalized -0.6119 -8.2385e-10 -4.197e-09 23.5 0.009 0
Table-13. States
Special 0.5196 0 0 204.1789
Generalized 0.5137 0 0 204.1789

Special 0.5196 -2.8668 0.5185
Generalized 0.5137 2.9539e-07 0

Special 0 0 0
Generalized 0 0 0

Special 0 0 0
Generalized 0 0 0
Simulation Results

Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0
Trim Results:

Horizontal Aileron Rudder Throttle Leading Speed
Tail (deg) (deg) (deg) (per) Edge Flap Brake
(deg) (deg)
Special -0.5219 -0.3057 2.7783 22.059 1.169 0
Generalized -0.5180 1.9733e-09 3.7547e-09 21.9813 1.1532 0
Table-15. States
Special 1.4491 0 0 197.04
Generalized 1.4375 0 0 197.03

Special 1.4491 4.4959 -1.2492
Generalized 1.4375 2.6929e-08 0

Special 0 0 0
Generalized 0 0 0

Special 0 0 3048
Generalized 0 0 3048
Simulation Results:

Comment:
Two different trim codes have been written to find the same trim point. Both codes were
expected to find almost the same result. When the results were examined, it was seen that
both codes obtained almost the same result. The thing here is that the code written for the
special case can reach the same result faster. In this way, faster results can be obtained when
many different trim points are wanted to be examined.
2.a.i.
Trim Conditions:
Velocity(Mach) Altitude(ft) Gamma(deg) Beta(deg) Phi(deg)
0.6 0 0 0 60
Trim Results:

-25 5.7921 30 76.6955 0 0
Table-17. States
0.1121 0 0 204.1789

0.111 60 0

0 4.1278 2.3832

0 0 0
Simulation Results

2.a.ii.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0 60
Trim Results:

-25 6.0576 30 70.6735 0 0
Table-19. States
0.1479 0 0 197.0347

0.1479 60 0

0 4.2775 2.4696

0 0 3048
Simulation Results

Şekil 49 – Altirude
2.a.iii.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 20000 0 0 60
Trim Results:

-25 6.4993 30 65.8010 0 0
Table-21. States
0.1434 0 0 189.6215

0.1434 60 0

0 4.4447 2.5661

0 0 6096
Simulation Results

2.a.iv.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0 30
Trim Results:

-25 5.3678 30 69.2964 0 0
Table-23. States
0.6019 0 0 197.0347

0.1434 30 0

0 0.8232 1.4258

0 0 3048
Simulation Results

2.a.v.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0 75
Trim Results:

-25 7.1905 30 70.7349 0 0
Table-25. States
0.0575 0 0 197.0347

0.0575 75 0

0 10.27 2.7547

0 0 3048
Simulation Results

Comments
Trim values were calculated with the trim code prepared for the steady-state turn flight
condition. When the behavior of the aircraft was observed by feeding the Simulink model
with these trim values, it was observed that the behavior of the aircraft was correct. Here, it is
seen that there is a small collapse while holding the altitude. This is due to the decrease in the
lift of the aircraft due to the bank. This is also expected behavior.
2.b.i.
Trim Conditions:
Velocity(Mach) Altitude(ft) Gamma(deg) Beta(deg) nz(g)
0.6 10000 0 0 2
Trim Results:

-25 7.5591 30 62.2718 0 0
Table-27. States
0.1121 0 0 179.6801

0.1121 60 0

4.676 2.6997 0

0 0 3048
Simulation Results

2.b.ii.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0 4
Trim Results:

-25 6.076 30 70.6742 0 0
Table-29. States
0.1476 0 0 197.0347

0.1476 60 0

4.2734 2.4673 0

0 0 3048
Simulation Results

2.b.iii.
Trim Conditions:
0.6 10000 0 0 6
Trim Results:

-25 8.3842 30 70.5883 0 0
Table-31. States
0.023 0 0 197.0347

0.023 80.4059 0

16.6189 2.8091 0

0 0 3048
Simulation Results

Comments:
Trim values were calculated with the trim code prepared for the steady-state turn flight 𝑛𝑧
condition. When the behavior of the aircraft was observed by feeding the Simulink model
with these trim values, it was observed that the behavior of the aircraft was correct. Here, it is
seen that there is a small collapse while holding the altitude. This is due to the decrease in the
lift of the aircraft due to the bank. This is also expected behavior.

UUM 523E Advanced Flight Dynamics Assignment 3 (Trim Conditions)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

UUM 523E Advanced Flight Dynamics Assignment 3 (Trim Conditions)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UUM 523E Advanced Flight Dynamics Assignment 3

Çağrı Ege Altunkaya 110160104

Table-1. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 1 - Alpha, Beta and Gamma

Şekil 2 - Phi and Psi

Table-3. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 6 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 7 - Phi and Psi

Table-5. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 11 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 12 - Phi and Psi

Table-7. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 16 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 17 - Phi and Psi

Table-9. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 21 - Phi, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 22 - Phi and Psi

Table-11. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 26 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 27 - Phi and Psi

Table-12. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 31 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 32 - Phi and Psi

Table-14. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 36 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 37 - Phi and Psi

Table-16. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 41 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 42 - Phi and Psi

Table-18. Control Deflections

Theta(deg) Phi(deg) Psi(deg)

P(deg/s) Q(deg/s) R(deg/s)

North(m) East(m) Altitude(m)

Şekil 46 - Alpha, Theta and Gamma

Şekil 47 - Phi and Psi