Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AT
Gwarko, Lalitpur
Type of Building : The Building covers a total plinth area of 111.89 sq. ft. The
building has been designed for two and half numbers of storeys.
For the design of the building, the Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant IS
1893:2002 have been referred to. All other factors related with the seismic design were also
adopted as for Kathmandu Valley of NBC 105:1994 and soil performance factor is based on
the geo technical investigation carried out at the site.
2 Load Calculation
2.1 Material
2.1.1 Concrete
Concrete is to conform to IS 456:2000 Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise
concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m3. Concrete is to
achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2 and 25 N/mm2.
2.1.2 Reinforcement
Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456: specification for carbon steel bars
for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786: specification for high
deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.
The following design strengths are to be used for the design of concrete and reinforcement.
Grade of Concrete : M20 for all columns and M20 for all other
2. Floor Loads
Thickness of structural slab = 0.125 m
Thickness of screed = 0.025 m
VB = C d * W
W=Seismic weight of the building
Cd=CZIK
Where,
Z = Zone factor = 1.0
ETABS utilizes the following procedure to generate the lateral seismic loads.
User provides seismic zone co-efficient and desired seismic load command.
The structural period (T) and seismic coefficients were calculated manually.
W is obtained from the weight data provided by the user.
The total lateral seismic load (base shear) is then distributed by the program
among different levels of the structure
3 Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called SAP2000 v16. It
provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze,
software. The dead load, live load and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as
per standard code of practices. Several analysis run were performed to achieve the best
3.3 Methodology
Mass source
The seismic weight and base shear generated by ETABS2016 is shown below:
1. 1.5DL + 1.5LL
2. 1.2DL+1.2LL1.2Ex
3. 1.2DL+1.2LL 1.2Ey
3. 1.5DL 1.5Ex
4. 1.5DL 1.5EEy
50% of LL as reduced live load RLL is to be considered when combined with EQ Load. Similarly,
earthquake load is to be considered in two horizontal directions X and Y and in each direction, the
load will be reversible, i.e. in +X and +Y directions.
To control overall deformation due to earthquake load, the criteria given in clause 7.11 of IS
1893:2002 is applied.
A three dimensional analysis of the structure was carried out using a Seismic Coefficient method.
ETABS2016 software was used for analysis of the model as well as the design of beam, column,
slab element and foundation.
a) Base Shear
Load
Case/Combo FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Comb1 0.00 0.00 10550.75 40857.75 -89414.31 0.00
Comb2 -272.60 0.00 8440.60 32686.20 -74355.73 1021.14
Comb3 272.60 0.00 8440.60 32686.20 -68707.16 -1021.14
Comb4 0.00 -287.45 8440.60 35664.31 -71531.45 -2229.48
Comb5 0.00 287.45 8440.60 29708.09 -71531.45 2229.48
Comb6 -340.75 0.00 9485.96 36683.83 -83236.96 1276.42
Comb7 340.75 0.00 9485.96 36683.83 -76176.24 -1276.42
Comb8 0.00 -359.31 9485.96 40406.47 -79706.60 -2786.85
Comb9 0.00 359.31 9485.96 32961.20 -79706.60 2786.85
Comb10 Max 340.75 359.31 10550.75 40857.75 -68707.16 2786.85
Comb10 Min -340.75 -359.31 8440.60 29708.09 -89414.31 -2786.85
c) Story Drifts
m m m
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb1 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb2 X 31
4 2 0.95 5 8
Story 8E- - 7.7 14.8
Comb2 Y 31
4 04 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb3 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 4 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb4 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb4 Y 31
4 3 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb5 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb5 Y 64 4.99 1.1
4 3 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb6 X 31
4 3 0.95 5 8
Story 9E- - 7.7 14.8
Comb6 Y 31
4 04 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb7 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 5 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb8 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 3 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb8 Y 31
4 4 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb9 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb9 Y 64 4.99 1.1
4 4 8
9
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
X 31
4 Max 3 0.95 5 8
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Y 31
4 Max 4 0.95 5 8
Story Comb10 0.00 - 14.8
X 64 4.99
4 Min 5 1.1 8
2. Footing
dimensions:
assuming selfweight of footing=10%
of (PA+PB)
(PA+PB)
Total service +10% of
load= (PA+PB)
= 953.6193 KN
Required area
of footing 6.3574
(Af)= 62 m2
…….
L1B1 +L2B2 = 6.357462 m2 (i)
length and width of footing
L1,B1 :- under exterior column A
length and width of footing
L2,B2 :- under interior column B
considering ;
B1=B2=B= 1.9 m
3.346 …….
L1+L2 = 033 m (ii)
c/c distance between column A & B
(x)= 5.18 m
b) Isolated
Isolated Footing
Column no. C3
load case 37
Concrete grade, M 25
Steel grade, Fe 500
Axial load, kN 684.74 kN
My, kNm 18.33 kNm
Mz, kNm 0.003 kNm
Column size, b 300 mm
Column size, d 300 mm
SBC of soil, kN/m2 150 kN/m2
Design factor 1.5
Pressure: Axial load 684.74 kN
App. Self weight 68.474 kN
753.21
Total weight 4 kN
5.0214
Area of footing 3 m2
size of footing, Bf 2.3 mt
size of footing, Df 2.3 mt
Projection, b1 1 mt
Projection, d1 1 mt
Footing Pressure,
Pmax = P/A + My/Zy +
Mz/Zz
Slab Design
Slab design
C-
D
INPU fro
T m
Location 1-2
g
Design 9.2 fc N/m c 1.
moment, M 5 kNm/m u 25 m² = 5
g
50 N/m s 1.
ßb 1 fy 0 m² = 1
42
span 54 mm
12
Height, h 5 mm
Bar Ø 8 mm
mm to this
reinforcem
cover 20 ent
OUTP A-C from 2-3
Staircase Design
Staircase Design
Data