You are on page 1of 34

Commercial Building, Gwarko

AT

Gwarko, Lalitpur

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Design Consultant:


1 Project Detail

Name of the Project :

Location : Gwarko, Lalitpur

Type of Building : The Building covers a total plinth area of 111.89 sq. ft. The
building has been designed for two and half numbers of storeys.

Ground Floor Plan

1 Building Design Parameters


The building consists of a RCC framed structure, which is essentially an assembly of cast-
in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof consists of cast-in-place concrete
slabs. Lateral load resisting system consists of bare frame elements only and the system has
been designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 800 - 2007.

For the design of the building, the Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant IS
1893:2002 have been referred to. All other factors related with the seismic design were also
adopted as for Kathmandu Valley of NBC 105:1994 and soil performance factor is based on
the geo technical investigation carried out at the site.

2 Load Calculation

Structural Analysis Report


Page 1
Following loads have been considered for the analysis and design of the building based on
the relevant Indian Standards.

2.1 Material
2.1.1 Concrete
Concrete is to conform to IS 456:2000 Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise
concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m3. Concrete is to
achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2 and 25 N/mm2.

2.1.2 Reinforcement

Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456: specification for carbon steel bars
for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786: specification for high
deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.

The following design strengths are to be used for the design of concrete and reinforcement.

Grade of Concrete : M20 for all columns and M20 for all other

Grade of steel : High Yield Fe 500 N/mm2

2.2 Load Calculations

2.2.1 Dead load calculation

1. Unit Weight of materials


Reinforced concrete = 25 KN/m3
Brick masonry = 18.85 KN/m3
Screed = 20.4 KN/m3
Cement plaster = 20.4 KN/m3
marble = 26.7 KN/m3

2. Floor Loads
Thickness of structural slab = 0.125 m
Thickness of screed = 0.025 m

Structural Analysis Report


Page 2
Thickness of celling plaster = 0.0125 m
Thickness of marble = 0.02 m

Dead Load of structural slab = 3.125 KN/m2


Dead Load of screed = 0.51 KN/m2
Dead Load of cement plaster = 0.255 KN/m2
Dead Load of marble = 0.534 KN/m2

Total dead load of floor finishes = 1.299 KN/m2

Dead load of partition


KN/m2
walls = 1

Total dead load = 5.424 KN/m2

3. Heights of Beams, Walls & parapet walls


Depth of Beam in Longitudinal
direction = 0.355 m
Depth of Beam in transverse
direction = 0.355 m

Height of each story of


building = 2.667 m
Height of parapet wall = 1 m

4. Dead Loads of Walls


Dead load of 230mm thick wall in longitudinal
KN/m
direction = 10.02
dead load of side plaster of exterior
KN/m
wall(12.5mm+25mm)thick = 1.77
Total dead load(Long. Dir.) = 11.79 KN/m
Dead load of 230mm thick wall in transverse
KN/m
direction = 10.02

Structural Analysis Report


Page 3
dead load of side plaster of exterior
KN/m
wall(12.5mm+25mm)thick = 1.77
Total dead load(Transverse. Dir.) = 11.79 KN/m
Dead load of 230mm thick wall with 30% in
KN/m
longitudinal direction = 8.25
Dead load of 230mm thick wall with 30%in
KN/m
transverse direction = 8.25
Dead load of 115mm thick wall in long. Direction = 5.01 KN/m
Dead load of 115mm thick wall in trans. Direction = 5.01 KN/m
Dead load of parapet wall 4"
KN/m
thick = 2.16775

2.2.2 Live Load Calculation

Live load in bedroom , living room = 2 KN/m2


Live load in corridor, staircase, balconies = 3 KN/m2
Roof live load access = 1.5 KN/m2
roof live load not access = 0.75 KN/m2

2.2.3 Seismic Loads:


Lateral Seismic Load is computed as per NBC 105:1994
The design base shear is computed as follows:

VB = C d * W
W=Seismic weight of the building
Cd=CZIK
Where,
Z = Zone factor = 1.0

Structural Analysis Report


Page 4
I = Importance factor = 1.0
R = Response reduction factor = 0.05
K = Structural performance factor = 1.0
C = Basic seismic coefficient = 0.08 if T≤ 0.5sec and
0.04/T ; T> 0.5sec

T = Natural time period

ETABS utilizes the following procedure to generate the lateral seismic loads.
 User provides seismic zone co-efficient and desired seismic load command.
 The structural period (T) and seismic coefficients were calculated manually.
 W is obtained from the weight data provided by the user.

The total lateral seismic load (base shear) is then distributed by the program
among different levels of the structure

3 Structural Analysis

The analysis and design have been carried out using software called SAP2000 v16. It

provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze,

design, and optimize the structural elements in a building model.

Structural Analysis Report


Page 5
The building geometry based on architectural drawings been generated using above named

software. The dead load, live load and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as

per standard code of practices. Several analysis run were performed to achieve the best

result to meet the design and service requirements.

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Staircase load

v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only

vi. Live loads

Structural Analysis Report


Page 6
3.1 3D modeling of the building:
i. 3D model of the building
ii. Plan of the building
iii. Elevation of the building

3D Modeling of the building

Structural Analysis Report


Page 7
Plan of the building

Structural Analysis Report


Page 8
Elevation of the building

Structural Analysis Report


Page 9
3.2 Load Pattern Definitions
TABLE: Load Patterns
Self
Weight Auto
Name Type
Multiplie Load
r
Dead Dead 1  
Live Live 0  
officelive Live 0  
stairs/passage Live 0  
toilet/bath Live 0  
roofacess Live 0  
roof no acess Live 0  
Superimposed
Parapet 0  
Dead
Superimposed
9'' wall 0  
Dead
9'' wall Superimposed
0  
opening Dead
Superimposed
4'' wall 0  
Dead
IS1893
EQx Seismic 0
2002
IS1893
EQy Seismic 0
2002

3.3 Methodology

Structural Analysis Report


Page 10
The design base shear is computed by ETABS 2016in accordance with the IS cod

Mass source

TABLE: Mass Source


Incl
Lu
Inclu ude Incl Incl Inclu
mp
Nam de Add ude ude de IsDef Load Multip
at
e Eleme ed Loa Late Verti ault Pattern lier
Stor
nts Mas ds ral cal
ies
s
MsS
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Dead 1
MsS
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Parapet 1
MsS
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 9'' wall 1

MsS 9'' wall


rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes opening 1
MsS
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 4'' wall 1
MsS
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Live 0.5
MsS officeliv
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes e 0.5
MsS stairs/pas
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes sage 0.5
MsS toilet/bat
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes h 0.5
MsS
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes roofacess 0.5
MsS roof no
rc1 No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes acess 0.5

The seismic weight and base shear generated by ETABS2016 is shown below:

Structural Analysis Report


Page 11
Load Dir. Damping Time Zone Soil Importance Seismic Base Shear
case Coeff. (%) Perid factor Type factor, (I) weight (kN)
(Z) (kN)
(Sec)

EQX X 5 0.3 1.00 II 1.0 6469.1533 221.1026

EQY Y 5 0.3 1.00 II 1.0 6469.1533 233.1449

3.3.1 Load Cases and Combinations used for analysis

Following Load combinations are to be used as per IS code:

1. 1.5DL + 1.5LL

2. 1.2DL+1.2LL1.2Ex

3. 1.2DL+1.2LL 1.2Ey

3. 1.5DL 1.5Ex

4. 1.5DL 1.5EEy

50% of LL as reduced live load RLL is to be considered when combined with EQ Load. Similarly,
earthquake load is to be considered in two horizontal directions X and Y and in each direction, the
load will be reversible, i.e. in +X and +Y directions.

3.3.2 Control of Deflection


In order to control deflection of structural elements, the criteria given in clause 23.2 of IS 456:2000
is proposed to be used.

To control overall deformation due to earthquake load, the criteria given in clause 7.11 of IS
1893:2002 is applied.

3.3.3 Control of Cracking


In order to avoid excessive cracking in the flexural members, maximum diameter and spacing of
the reinforcement is restricted as per the detailing rules indicated in clause 26.0 IS:456-2000.

3.3.4 Masonry Walls


Masonry walls have been treated as non-structural infill panels. Therefore, the structural safety of
these walls is ensured by treating them as one way / two way slab panels spanning between
adjoining beams and columns. These walls are designed as un-reinforced masonry as per` IS:1905-
1987 and IS:4326-1993.

Structural Analysis Report


Page 12
While external walls are provided with shear connector reinforcement on the underside of upper
beams and sides of columns the internal partition walls are connected to roof slabs using dry
packing mortar between top of walls and soffit of slab / beam.

3.3.5 Site conditions:


Soil Type : Gravel mixed soil

Allowable Bearing Capacity : 150 KN/sq m

3.3.6 Design procedure:


Adopt initial size of members on the basis of Architectural and serviceability requirement.

Analysis the structure in design load.

Conform the section on deflection criteria.

Design for stresses

Conform with construction criteria.

3.4 ANALYSIS PART

3.4.1 Design Software

A three dimensional analysis of the structure was carried out using a Seismic Coefficient method.
ETABS2016 software was used for analysis of the model as well as the design of beam, column,
slab element and foundation.

3.4.2 Output data results

Some of the important sample output data are presented below:

a) Base Shear

Base Reaction (UNIT KN METER)

Structural Analysis Report


Page 13
TABLE: Base Reactions

Load
Case/Combo FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
  kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Comb1 0.00 0.00 10550.75 40857.75 -89414.31 0.00
Comb2 -272.60 0.00 8440.60 32686.20 -74355.73 1021.14
Comb3 272.60 0.00 8440.60 32686.20 -68707.16 -1021.14
Comb4 0.00 -287.45 8440.60 35664.31 -71531.45 -2229.48
Comb5 0.00 287.45 8440.60 29708.09 -71531.45 2229.48
Comb6 -340.75 0.00 9485.96 36683.83 -83236.96 1276.42
Comb7 340.75 0.00 9485.96 36683.83 -76176.24 -1276.42
Comb8 0.00 -359.31 9485.96 40406.47 -79706.60 -2786.85
Comb9 0.00 359.31 9485.96 32961.20 -79706.60 2786.85
Comb10 Max 340.75 359.31 10550.75 40857.75 -68707.16 2786.85
Comb10 Min -340.75 -359.31 8440.60 29708.09 -89414.31 -2786.85

b) Modal Mass Participation Ratios

TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios


Cas Mo Period( U Su Su Su R Su Su Su
UX UY RY RZ
e de sec) Z m m m X m m m

Structural Analysis Report


Page 14
U
UX UY RX RY RZ
Z
Mo 0.46 0.2 0.4 0.2 0. 0.11 0.04 0.0 0.1 0.0
1 1.433 0 0
dal 83 8 68 8 09 96 48 88 2 45
Mo 0.32 0.3 0.7 0.6 0. 0.08 0.14 0.2 0.2 0.1
2 1.359 0 0
dal 05 33 89 13 11 93 53 01 09 9
Mo 0.00 0.1 0.7 0.8 0. 0.00 0.57 0.2 0.2 0.7
3 1.307 0 0
dal 68 93 96 06 01 09 53 12 1 65
Mo 0.01 0.0 0.8 0.8 0. 0.07 0.03 0.4 0.2 0.8
4 0.491 0 0
dal 6 33 12 4 2 77 89 1 88 04
Mo 0.06 0.0 0.8 0.8 0. 0.32 0.00 0.4 0.6 0.8
5 0.465 0 0
dal 12 09 73 49 05 15 98 6 09 14
Mo 0.00 0.0 0.8 0.8 0. 0.00 0.02 0.6 0.6 0.8
6 0.397 0 0
dal 06 45 73 94 21 17 96 69 11 44
Mo 0.00 0.0 0.8 0.8 0. 0.02 0.02 0.6 0.6 0.8
7 0.316 0 0
dal 71 03 81 96 01 46 04 77 35 64
Mo 0.02 2E- 0.9 0.8 0.07 0.00 0.6 0.7 0.8
8 0.304 0 0 0
dal 99 04 11 96 86 21 77 14 66
Mo 7.3E 0.0 0.9 0.9 0. 1E- 0.01 0.7 0.7 0.8
9 0.271 0 0
dal -07 14 11 1 03 06 78 09 14 84
Mo 0.00 0.0 0.9 0.9 0. 0.00 0.00 0.7 0.7 0.8
10 0.253 0 0
dal 02 02 11 12 01 06 11 15 15 85
Mo 3.4E 1E- 0.9 0.9 3E- 0.00 0.7 0.7 0.8
11 0.207 0 0 0
dal -05 04 11 13 05 11 16 15 86
Mo 0.00 0.0 0.9 0.9 0. 0.00 0.00 0.7 0.7 0.8
12 0.187 0 0
dal 02 14 11 27 04 06 51 53 15 91

c) Story Drifts

TABLE: Story Drifts

Story Load Directi Drif Lab X Y Z


Case/Com on t el

Structural Analysis Report


Page 15
bo

 
        m m m
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb1 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb2 X 31
4 2 0.95 5 8
Story 8E- - 7.7 14.8
Comb2 Y 31
4 04 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb3 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 4 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb4 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb4 Y 31
4 3 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb5 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb5 Y 64 4.99 1.1
4 3 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb6 X 31
4 3 0.95 5 8
Story 9E- - 7.7 14.8
Comb6 Y 31
4 04 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb7 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 5 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb8 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 3 8
9
Story 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Comb8 Y 31
4 4 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb9 X 64 4.99 1.1
4 2 8
9
-
Story 0.00 14.8
Comb9 Y 64 4.99 1.1
4 4 8
9
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
X 31
4 Max 3 0.95 5 8
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7 14.8
Y 31
4 Max 4 0.95 5 8
Story Comb10 0.00 - 14.8
X 64 4.99
4 Min 5 1.1 8

Structural Analysis Report


Page 16
9
-
Story Comb10 0.00 14.8
Y 64 4.99 1.1
4 Min 4 8
9
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb1 X 55 1.4
3 1 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb1 Y 55 1.4
3 1 6 8
2
Story 0.00 - 7.7 11.1
Comb2 X 31
3 3 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb3 X 55 1.4
3 4 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb3 Y 55 1.4
3 1 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb4 X 55 1.4
3 1 6 8
2
Story 0.00 - 11.1
Comb4 Y 41 -1
3 4 0.95 8
-
Story 8E- 20.0 11.1
Comb5 X 55 1.4
3 04 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb5 Y 55 1.4
3 3 6 8
2
Story 0.00 - 7.7 11.1
Comb6 X 31
3 4 0.95 5 8
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb7 X 55 1.4
3 5 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb7 Y 55 1.4
3 2 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb8 X 55 1.4
3 2 6 8
2
Story 0.00 - 11.1
Comb8 Y 41 -1
3 5 0.95 8
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb9 X 55 1.4
3 1 6 8
2
-
Story 0.00 20.0 11.1
Comb9 Y 55 1.4
3 4 6 8
2

Structural Analysis Report


Page 17
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7 11.1
X 31
3 Max 4 0.95 5 8
Story Comb10 0.00 - 11.1
Y 41 -1
3 Max 5 0.95 8
-
Story Comb10 0.00 20.0 11.1
X 55 1.4
3 Min 5 6 8
2
-
Story Comb10 0.00 20.0 11.1
Y 55 1.4
3 Min 4 6 8
2
Story 9E- -
Comb1 X 41 -1 8.01
2 04 0.95
Story 0.00 18.9
Comb1 Y 20 0 8.01
2 1 5
Story 0.00 16.6 7.7
Comb2 X 24 8.01
2 4 9 5
Story 0.00 -
Comb3 X 41 -1 8.01
2 4 0.95
Story 0.00 - 7.7
Comb4 Y 31 8.01
2 5 0.95 5
Story 6E- -
Comb5 X 41 -1 8.01
2 04 0.95
Story 0.00 18.9
Comb5 Y 20 0 8.01
2 4 5
Story 0.00 16.6 7.7
Comb6 X 24 8.01
2 4 9 5
Story 0.00 -
Comb7 X 41 -1 8.01
2 5 0.95
Story 0.00 - 7.7
Comb8 Y 31 8.01
2 6 0.95 5
Story 8E- -
Comb9 X 41 -1 8.01
2 04 0.95
Story 0.00 18.9
Comb9 Y 20 0 8.01
2 5 5
Story Comb10 0.00 16.6 7.7
X 24 8.01
2 Max 4 9 5
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7
Y 31 8.01
2 Max 6 0.95 5
Story Comb10 0.00 -
X 41 -1 8.01
2 Min 5 0.95
Story Comb10 0.00 18.9
Y 20 0 8.01
2 Min 5 5
Story 3E-
Comb1 X 16 1.82 0 4.84
1 04
Story 6E- 18.9
Comb1 Y 20 0 4.84
1 04 5
Story 0.00 7.7
Comb2 X 21 4.99 4.84
1 3 5

Structural Analysis Report


Page 18
Story 0.00
Comb3 X 16 1.82 0 4.84
1 4
Story 0.00 - 7.7
Comb4 Y 31 4.84
1 4 0.95 5
Story 4E- - 7.7
Comb5 X 31 4.84
1 04 0.95 5
Story 0.00 - 7.7
Comb5 Y 31 4.84
1 4 0.95 5
Story 0.00 7.7
Comb6 X 21 4.99 4.84
1 4 5
Story 0.00
Comb7 X 16 1.82 0 4.84
1 4
Story 0.00 - 7.7
Comb8 Y 31 4.84
1 5 0.95 5
Story 6E- - 7.7
Comb9 X 31 4.84
1 04 0.95 5
Story 0.00 - 7.7
Comb9 Y 31 4.84
1 5 0.95 5
Story Comb10 0.00 7.7
X 21 4.99 4.84
1 Max 4 5
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7
Y 31 4.84
1 Max 5 0.95 5
Story Comb10 0.00
X 16 1.82 0 4.84
1 Min 4
Story Comb10 0.00 - 7.7
Y 31 4.84
1 Min 5 0.95 5
Pstor 1E- 7.7
Comb1 X 1 0 1.67
ey 04 5
Pstor 3E- 13.7
Comb1 Y 19 0 1.67
ey 04 7
Pstor 0.00 5.1
Comb2 X 2 0 1.67
ey 1 5
Pstor 0.00 7.7
Comb3 X 21 4.99 1.67
ey 1 5
Pstor 4E- 5.1
Comb4 X 2 0 1.67
ey 04 5
Pstor 0.00 5.1
Comb4 Y 2 0 1.67
ey 2 5
Pstor 0.00
Comb5 Y 17 4.99 0 1.67
ey 2
Pstor 0.00 5.1
Comb6 X 2 0 1.67
ey 2 5
Pstor 0.00 7.7
Comb7 X 21 4.99 1.67
ey 2 5
Pstor 4E- 5.1
Comb8 X 2 0 1.67
ey 04 5
Pstor 0.00 5.1
Comb8 Y 2 0 1.67
ey 2 5

Structural Analysis Report


Page 19
Pstor 0.00 7.7
Comb9 Y 21 4.99 1.67
ey 2 5
Pstor Comb10 0.00 5.1
X 2 0 1.67
ey Max 2 5
Pstor Comb10 0.00 5.1
Y 2 0 1.67
ey Max 2 5
Pstor Comb10 0.00 7.7
X 21 4.99 1.67
ey Min 2 5
Pstor Comb10 0.00 7.7
Y 21 4.99 1.67
ey Min 2 5

Footing Sample Design


a) Strap footing

Design of strap footing


Strap Beam along 1, F and H
Working Load
carry by
column A 395.42 Factored load 434.
(PA)=     67 KN (PAu)= 97 KN  
Working Load
carry by
column Factored load 518.
B(PB)=     471.5 KN (PBu)= 65 KN  
sizeof column
A   x-dir A 300 mm          
    y-dir A 300 mm          
size of column
B   x-dir B 350 mm          
    y-dir B 350 mm          
c/c distance
between
column A & B
(x')=       5.18 m        
consdering;                  
unit weight of KN/
soil (We)=       20 m2        
Angle of
repose (φ) =   30 degree            
safe bearing of
capacity of KN/
soil(sqc)=       150 m2        

Structural Analysis Report


Page 20
characteristic
strength of N/m
concrete(fck)=       25 m2        
characteristic
strength of N/m
steel(fy)=       500 m2        
1. Depth of
foundation:                  
  h=                
  = 0.833441 1 m          
The base of foundation is located at the depth
of 1m below which soil is not subjected to
seasonal volumn            
changes caused by alternate wetting and
drying;            
                   

2. Footing
dimensions:                  
assuming selfweight of footing=10%
of (PA+PB)              
(PA+PB)
Total service +10% of
load=   (PA+PB)              
  = 953.6193 KN            
Required area
of footing 6.3574
(Af)=     62 m2          
                   
…….
L1B1 +L2B2 =   6.357462 m2 (i)          
                   
length and width of footing
L1,B1 :- under exterior column A            
length and width of footing
L2,B2 :- under interior column B            
considering ;
B1=B2=B=   1.9 m            
3.346 …….
L1+L2 = 033 m (ii)            
                   
c/c distance between column A & B
(x)=   5.18 m        

Structural Analysis Report


Page 21
c.g. of column loads from the axis of column A (x')=          
2.8172
    x'= 74 m          
the distance of c.g. of column loads from the
left edge column A (x")=     2.97 m    

distance of the centroid of the whole area from


the left edge of column A;            
                   
L1B1*L1/2+L2B2*( x- …….
dirA/2+x)=(L1B1+L2B2)*x"       (iii)      
(L1^2)/2+L2*( (x-
dirA)/2+x)=(L1+L2)*x"              
9.9285
(L1^2)/2+L2*( (x-dirA)/2+x)= 96            
9.9285
(L1^2)/2+ 5.33 L2 = 96            
substituting the value of 3.3460
L1 as L1=   33 -L2          
L2^2
  + 3.967935 L2 + -8.7 = 0        
1.5653
    L2 = 12 m          
  L1 = 1.780721 m            
L1= 1.8 m L2 = 1.6 m        
                   
Desig
n of
footin
3. g slab                
                   
                   
Thickness of the footing based on
a. moment:          
The effective thickness of footing may be determined by
considering singly reinforced balanced section;        
  Pu = net upward ultimate soil pressure        
KN/m
  = 201.2988 2            

The width of beam is considered as the max


width of pedestal =     300 mm    

Structural Analysis Report


Page 22
Cantilever projection of the footing slab = 0.8 m        
Maximum
bending
moment per KN
meter width =       129 m        
Equating
Mu,lim to Mu;                  
k fck
b d^2 0.13 ( for N/m
  = 128.8312   k= 3 Fe= 500 m2 )  
                   
  d= 196.8406 mm            
b.Thickness of footing based on one
way shear              
The effective thickness of footing may be determined by
considering that the shear is resisted without        
shear reinforcement as
follows;                
                   
or; d=                
                   
maximum ultimate shear per unit width at a section at
Vu,max= distance d from the face of beam      
Pu(0.5B-
  = 0.5b-d)              
201.29 KN/
  here; Pu= 88 m2          
    B= 1.9 m          
    b= 300 mm          
Takin
  g; bo= 1 m          
shear strength of concrete in
foundation              
k which may be taken as 1.0 for 300mm *shear
assumed total depth     strength of concrete    

which may be taken as its minimum value of


0.36 N/mm2 on consideration that the            
flexural reinforcement shall be small due to
large depth of foundation slab on shear
consideration            
N/mm
  = 0.36 2            
Therefore;                  

Structural Analysis Report


Page 23
                   
0.2869
  or, d= 04 m          
the thickness of footing is governed
Therefore; by one way shear.          
Hence; d= 286.9043 mm            

clear cover of 50mm +


and , D= 286.9043 mm + (assumed diameter)/2      
at a
clearco
Providing 10 mm φ ver =   40 mm      
  D= 331.9043 mm            
consider; D= 350 mm            
effective depth
(d) =   305 mm            
upto
a
dista
A uniform nce
thickness of   350 mm of   305 mm    
(from the face
and then it is reduced linearly to of footing
200mm at the edge;       beam)    
Provided
overall depth
(D) =     350 mm d= 305 mm    
Mu/b
  d2 = 1.38491              
Percentage of steel
required                
pt,li 0.94 ( for N/m
  pt % 0.34191 % m = 75 % Fe= 415 m2 )
  Ast = 1042.824 mm2            
75.312 mm
Spacing of 10 mm φ bar 3 c/c          
                   
Provided mm φ
spacing of   10 bar @ 75 mm c/c      
                   
Actual area of steel 1047.1
provided =   67 mm2          
rebar
percentage of steel provided (Pt% percent
provided) =   0.34 % OK      

Structural Analysis Report


Page 24
For the development length , the following
conditon should be satisfied,            
Length of bar beyond
the face of beam   Ld            
0.5(B-b)-clearcover of
25mm   Ld =            
                   
( for N/m
= 775   = 566 mm Fck= 20 m2 )  
it is N/m
Hence, safe         τbd= 1.2 m2  

Distribution steel = 0.12% of bd              


  = 366 mm2            
require mm
spacing of 10 mm dia d 215 c/c        
mm mm
provided spacing of 10 dia 200 c/c        
Design of strap beam                
The maximum bending moment for the strap
beam will occur where the shear force is zero.            
Let , zero shear force occur at a distance x'''
from left edge of column A;            
(from
1.550 left x''' (form right
x''' = 824 m edge)   = 1.36 m edge)
Maxiu
Maxiumum mum KN
B.M =   -138.513 KNm     B.M =   -261 m
Then, Maximum Bending Moment KN
(Mu,max) =   -261 m        
Consider                  
The width of beam is considered as the max
width of pedestal =     300 mm    
Equating Mu,lim to Mu,                
Mu k fck b ……. 0.13 ( for N/m
  = d^2 (iv) k= 3 Fe= 500 m2 )  
                   
  d = 511.4206
mm            
at a
clearco
ver of
let , 16 mm =   25 mm      
overall depth   544.4206 mm            

Structural Analysis Report


Page 25
=
Provide an overall
depth of =   450 mm          
Thus, effective depth = 417 mm            
    5.00122              
                   
pt % pt,li 0.94 ( for N/m
  = 1.793886 % m = 75 % Fe= 500 m2 )
Therefore, Ast = 2244.151 mm2            
    Provide 3 25 mm + 4 16 mm
                   
provide
Provded d pt%
    Ast =   2277 mm2 =   1.82 %
                   
Check for
shear                  
                   
S.F. at distance 'd' from the face of the column
A= -319 KN        
S.F. at distance 'd' from the face of the column
B= 414 KN        
                   
Nominal shear stress at 2.5492 N/m
column A =   46 m2          
Nominal shear stress at 3.3085 N/m
column B =   32 m2          
                   
percentage of steel 1.8199
provided (pt%) =   86 %          
N/m
permissible shear stress = 0.54 m2          
shear reinforcement is
require at column A                
shear reinforcement is
require at column B                
Spacing shear
reinforcement ;                  
                   
- legged
stirrups of
  2 dia   8 mm        
  Sv = 60.21626 mm   313 mm &  

Structural Analysis Report


Page 26
min
of
0.75d 450
c/c = mm
min. shear
reinforcement
    criteria            
mm
    302.4732 c/c            
Provide shear 2- legged stirrups of
  stirrups of 8mm dia @ 200mmc/c        

b) Isolated

Isolated Footing

Column no. C3

 
load case 37    
  Concrete grade, M 25    
  Steel grade, Fe 500    
  Axial load, kN 684.74 kN  
  My, kNm 18.33 kNm  
  Mz, kNm 0.003 kNm  
  Column size, b 300 mm  
  Column size, d 300 mm  
  SBC of soil, kN/m2 150 kN/m2  
  Design factor 1.5    
         
Pressure: Axial load 684.74 kN  
  App. Self weight 68.474 kN  
753.21
  Total weight 4 kN  
         
5.0214
  Area of footing 3 m2  
  size of footing, Bf 2.3 mt  
  size of footing, Df 2.3 mt  
  Projection, b1 1 mt  
  Projection, d1 1 mt  
         
  Footing Pressure,      
Pmax = P/A + My/Zy +
  Mz/Zz      

Structural Analysis Report


Page 27
138.48
  Pmax 1 kN/m2
Pmin = P/A - My/Zy -
  Mz/Zz      
  Pmin 120.4 kN/m2
         
         
         
Eccentricity:        
1.2303
  Y 2 mt  
1.0696
  X 8 mt  
  L 2.3 mt  
1.5333
  2/3 L 3 mt  
         
  b 2.3 mt  
194.16
  qu 1 kN/m2  
194.16
  Eff. qu 1 kN/m2  
Shear Chk.        
One way Shear : At
distance d from face of
  column.      
  pt assumed 0.25 %  
N/mm
  Designed shear stress 0.36 2  
  vu 290.27    
350.36
  d= 9 mm  
  d provided 350 mm  
         
Two way Shear : At
distance d/2 from face of
  column.      
  Perimeter 2600 mm  
945.07
  S.F. at this section 7 kN  
  Ks 1    
N/mm
  tc 1.25 2  
1.0385 N/mm
  tv 5 2  
  Resistance 1137.5 N/mm Saf

Structural Analysis Report


Page 28
2 e
         
         
Flexure design:        
         
  For section efbg      
138.47
  pressure@f 8 kN/m2  
138.48
  pressure@b 1 kN/m2  
97.080
  Moment@eg. Meg 3 kNm  
145.62
  Mu 1 kNm  
  d provided 350 mm  
1.1887 N/mm
  Mu/bd2 4 2  
  pt 0.2902 %  
  pt provided 0.2902    
mm2/
m
  Ast 1015.7 width  
  provide 10 50  
mm2/
m
  Ast Provided 1413 width  
         
Check in other
direction :        
  For section abcd      
138.48
  pressure@b 1 kN/m2  
120.40
  pressure@c 3 kN/m2  
97.080
  Moment@ad, Mad 3 kNm  
145.62
  Mu 1 kNm  
209.25
  d req 4 mm  
1.1887
  M/bd2 4   
  pt 0.2902%  
mm2/
m
  Ast 1016 width  

Structural Analysis Report


Page 29
  provide 10 50  
  Ast provided 1413 mm2  

Slab Design

Slab design

C-
D
INPU fro
T m
Location 1-2            
g
Design 9.2 fc N/m c 1.
  moment, M 5 kNm/m u 25 m² = 5
g
50 N/m s 1.
  ßb 1   fy 0 m² = 1
42
  span 54 mm          
12
  Height, h 5 mm          
  Bar Ø 8 mm          
mm to this
reinforcem
  cover 20 ent          
                 
OUTP A-C from 2-3              

Structural Analysis Report


Page 30
UT
d = 115 - 20 -
8/2 = 91.0
  mm             .

(3.4.4. K' = 0.156 >


4) K = 0.045 ok             .
z = 91.0 [0.5
+ (0.25 -
0.045 /0.9)^½
= 86.2 >
(3.4.4. 0.95d = 86.5
4) mm              
As = 9.25E6 /
500 /86.2 x
1.05 = 225 >
(3.4.4. min As = 150
1) mm²/m              
PROVIDE Y8 As increased by
@ 100 = 503 90.5% for
  mm²/m       deflection
fs = 2/3 x 500
x 225 /503
/1.00 = 149.4
(Eqn 8) N/mm²              
Tens mod
factor = 0.55
+ (477 -
149.4) /120
/(0.9 + 1.117)
(Eqn 7) = 1.904       CHECKS
Permissible
L/d = 26.0 x
(3.4.6. 1.904 =
3) 49.493       Deflection is ok
Actual L/d =
4254 /91.0 = Maximum
. 46.747 ok       spacing is ok
Minimum spacing
  .       is ok

Staircase Design

Staircase Design

Data          

Effective Span (l) 2640 mm      

Structural Analysis Report


Page 31
Riser (R) 177.8 mm      
Thread (T) 254 mm      
Waist Slab thickness
125 mm      
(t)
Clear Cover 15 mm      
Effective Depth of
110 mm      
Waist Slab (d)
           
Grade of Concrete
20 mpa      
(fck)
Grade of Steel (fy) 500 mpa      
           
Loading          
Loads on
Loads on going        
waist slab
Self
Self weight of waist KN/ weight of KN/
3.81454863 3.125
slab m landing m
slab
KN/ Live KN/
Self weight of steps 2.2225 2
m Load m
Floor
KN/ KN/
Live Load 3 Finish 1
m m
Load
KN/ Total KN/
Floor Finish Load 1 6.125
m Load m
10.0370486 KN/ Factored 9.187 KN/
Total Load
3 m Load 5 m
15.0555729 KN/
Factored Load      
4 m
           
           
Bending Moment          
           
           
13.11641515          
           
Reaction          
19.87335629          
           
           
Area of Main Steel          

Structural Analysis Report


Page 32
Ast 293.880957        
           
Spacing          
Diameter of bar 12ø 16ø      
384.840639
Spacing across x 684.2      
9
           
10ø @ 150
Provded Main Steel:        
c/c
           
           
Area of Distribution
         
Steel
Ast 150        
           
Spacing          
Diameter of bar 8ø 10ø      
335.103216
Spacing across y 523.6      
4
           
Provided Distridution 10ø @ 150
       
Steel: c/c

Structural Analysis Report


Page 33

You might also like