Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. There are only 10 spaces in the lifeboat, but there are 11 passengers on the sinking ship.
A decision must be made. Who will stay behind?
Utilitarianism as were stated by Britannica (n.d), is moral theory that primary aim is to
promote happiness or pleasure for the benefits of everyone and persons that were
involved. If, there are 11 passengers in a sinking boat and there are only 10 lifeboats, I
will not hesitate to give the lifeboat that supposed to be mine to the person who doesn’t
have it. Why? It is because I believe in the principle of so-called utilitarianism, wherein
as an individual, I can sacrifice myself to be able to save the lives of 10 persons in the
boat, because maybe majority of the passengers of the boat are children and senior
citizens, and if I were going to save myself first, and one of them are going to die due to
the insufficiency of the lifeboats, it such a selfish decision for me to do that, and it would
definitely cannot handle by my conscience. So, yes, I can voluntarily give the lifeboat of
mine to the person who doesn’t have to save their lives, and also, I would tell him/her
that, it is not his/her responsibility that I sacrifice myself for him/her. But I will tell them
that it is my decision, and it is the calling of conscience, a calling to serve and prioritize
the sake of other first, rather than mine.
2. A train with broken brakes is speeding towards a fork in the tracks. On the left, there is
a woman crossing with her two children; on the right, there is a man doing routine
maintenance on the tracks. If you are an engineer, who side will you choose?
I would side with the woman with two children. Why? It is because, there are three lives
are in my hands, and it is my responsibility to save those lives, most especially two of
those lives are children. And, as an individual who had two cousins that I raise and cared
ever since they were a baby, it is such a burden and despair for myself, to not do
something to save them. And I also believe that maybe those two children are not enough
to understand and deal with that kind of situation, maybe they panic and not do
something, if they see the train coming to them. Moreover, I can also save the life of the
man repairing his track by shouting out loud that there is a train that broke its brakes, and
I think he will know what he is about to do, when he heard that. Furthermore, according
to Kohlberg, as an individual develops both mentally and psychologically, they can make
the right decision based on the best results. With that being said, I do believe that saving
the lives of the mother having the two children are the best and right decision that leads
for a better result, since saving them will save three lives, three lives that two of those are
children.
SOURCE: Kohlberg, three stages of moral development (2022). Retrieved 9 February 2022,
from
https://www.simplypsychology.org/kohlberg.html#:~:text=Kohlberg%20identified%20three%20
distinct%20levels,preconventional%2C%20conventional%2C%20and%20postconventional.
As an individual and Christian, I strongly disagree with the concept of death penalty, and
I believe that it is unethical in my belief as a Catholic. I strongly disagree with it, since it
is against to my faith, and it is a sin to kill someone even though he/she committed such a
hideous crime or sin. As a person who raised by family that closest to serving God, it
against to principle because, I learned to forgive someone no matter how heavy his/her
sin was, similarly on how Jesus, forgave those persons who doesn’t believe and him.
Moreover, I also believe that if someone is being guilty on committing such crime like
murder or homicide, we should offer the decision into the hands of the law, since they are
the one who are responsible for that, and we as an individual should empower the power
of the rule of law and supports it decision on that thing that are truly matter. But if that
decision will harm or sacrifice someone’s life, with exchange on his/her committed
crime, then I would not definitely agree to it.
4. What do you choose: Stay living unhappily or Commit suicide and await uncertainty
after life? Why?
As an individual, I always believe in the saying that “everything happens for a reason”.
And, if I were to ask suicide or live unhappily? I will choose to stay living unhappily,
because I do believe that our main role in this world, is to encounter several challenges,
testing our patience, faith, and principles. And it is our responsibility to survive those
circumstances that we are encountering, for us to be strengthen our faith, loyalty, and
bravery in our lives. Living an unhappily lives is similarly to a day, maybe it will not be a
good one for us, since we are struggling with problems, stress, and depression, but there
is always a hope beyond those struggles. There is a better day to come. As a student, to
be honest, there are times that I keep thinking on committing suicide, because of the
burden pressure and expectation that keeps me, but in the end of the day it is always my
motivation that it is just a grade, it is just an expectation, in the end of the day, I’m the
one who will empower my selves to fight for it and to live it for a better.
Activity 1
NOTE: There are only 5-7 sentences on my answers, it looks long since some of the
sentences are complex and compound. But overall, I followed the said instructions.
TERROR LAW -It regulates our -As I mentioned, -This law -It is essential in
behavior in a before there is promotes justice the way that it
sense that it limits certain condition in a sense that it can uplift the
ourselves in a that limits us will provide a lives of so many
certain thing that with inclined to scope of by following
we are about to be this law. First, protection for certain
doing, acts that we this law was everyone against regulations
are about to take passed to fight terrorism. passed by the
in and control to and avoid Moreover, it also government.
those things. This terrorism. aims to put the
law seems to have Second, as were trust and respect -It also brings
a good and bad stated it aims to of its people in essential since it
effects in the lives protect the the government. protect SOME
of the Filipino liberty and life It also ensures of the rights of
people. But, as an of the people. that every the people
individual, I do But as an citizen can be against
believe that this individual, I do truly express terrorism.
kind of law is not believe that this themselves
ethically correct, law is not freely and in -Ensure that
since I believe regulating it just. there is a
that it can put properly, But, as an protection that
innocent someone especially in a individual, I do will serve and
into danger and sense of believe that this will uphold the
fear. Moreover, I providing rights law is not truly country’s
also believe that and freedom for promoting current
this law is Filipinos. justice, but it condition,
strongly against to Instead of doing promotes threat merely in terms
our rights and that, it promotes and panic to the of its economy.
principles as an against to what people.
individual. Our it was, this law Furthermore, I -It improves and
rights, to express brings horror, do believe that become
ourselves to fear, and terror this law in not essential into
deliver our to the people, made to protect our economy, in
thoughts and to given the fact its people, yes, which, it
share our ideas to that they can be some ways it protects our
the public. arrested even may be country and its
though without considered be people towards
warrant. So, correct, but for terrorism.
overall if I were me, it is
to ask if how it ethically and -It creates an
promotes or morally opportunity for
does it guarantee unaccepted, every individual
right, yes, it is since as an to be
based on its individual I do responsible and
content, but believe that the contribute to the
overall, it government general well
contradicts to aims to protect being of the
what it was its people, in a country and
supposed to be way that will economy.
and do. treat them the
best, given that
there are
numerous
encounter upon
signing this law,
it is a clearly
indication that it
is not promotes
harmoniously
good ethical and
moral principles
for all.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION:
(FOR IDEA AND KNOWLEDGE PURPOSES ONLY)
How are your rights protected? | Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2022).
Retrieved 10 February 2022, from https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/what-are-human-
rights/how-are-your-rights-protected
Position Paper on the Anti-Terror Bill (SB 1083/HB 6875) by Faculty Members of the
UP Department of Political Science – Department of Political Science | University of the
Philippines Diliman. (2020). Retrieved 10 February 2022, from
https://polisci.upd.edu.ph/position-paper-on-the-anti-terror-bill/
https://youtu.be/3C455VwtqxA
https://youtu.be/5K3zcWRPmKk
https://youtu.be/p6DmG1UK_ik