Department of Education

National Capital Region

SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MAKATI CI

OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period: Weight per
SY 2021-2022

Weight per
Objective
Timeline

KRA

MFOs KRAs Strands/Objectives MOV's

1.1 Vision, Mission and Core

Values
1.2 School Planning and
Implementation
MOVs: Q
Conducted strategic planning
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

1.School Dashboard;
with the school planning team.
October 2021- July 2022 or as directed

*Strategic Planning must be

2.Communicated School
conducted with the following
Report Card (SRC );
Leading Strategically

indicators:
3. Accomplishment/Annual
1. Data-based
Report
(KPI)
20% 5% 4. Approved AIP (AIP Review
2. Anchored on the
Form/AIP Monitoring of
DepEd's Vision, Mission and E
accomplishment
Objectives;
5.
3. engaged
Conduct of Strategic
with the school community;
Planning Minutes, Pics,
4. aligned with
attendance, Memo, etc.
the Division Office's goals and
objectives; and
5. T
focused on learner-centered
principle

1.3 Policy Implementation MOVs:

and Review Undertake policy 1. Conducted SOSA
implementation and review in 2. Evidences of
the school. communication to SDO/SDO Q
* This should Approval 3.
be guided by the following Documents as cross-
indicators: validated from SDO records
1. ensuring that 4. Copy of Program
October operations are consistent with Implementation
2021- July 5% national and local laws, Review/**PSDS Report
2022 regulations and issuances;
2. E
TION SERVICES

properly coordinated with the

SDO; 3. non-issuance of
Memo/Incident report from the ** SDO
Strategically

SDO; and Records

4. Minimal
instances of technical assistance
from higher authorities
 SDO; 3. non-issuance of

BASIC EDUCATION SERVI

Memo/Incident report from the ** SDO

Leading Strategically
SDO; and Records
4. Minimal
instances of technical assistance T
from higher authorities
1.4 Research and Innovation
Conducted
relevant research activities to MOVs:
improve school performance. 1. evidences of
* SRC/DLRFP/DRC Q
Research activities must be endorsement/approval
guided by the following letter 2.
indicators: Copy of the completed
October Action Research or
1. followed standard
2021- July 5%
2022 DepEd format; innovation Proposal
2. (Research Tool included)
E
Data-driven/evidence-based;
3. 3 .Presented/Utilized the
conducted and utilized findings findings/result of the
to improve school performance; research.
and 4. T
well-documented as stipulated
in the RMG
1.5 Program Design and
Implementation 1.6 Learner
Voice
1.7 Monitoring and
Q
Evaluation Processes
Implement
programs in the school that
subscribe to learner voice and
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

conducted appropriate MOVs:

monitoring and evaluation
Leading Strategically

processes to achieve learner 1. Survey/FGD/ needs

and school development. Analysis 2.
October *The Project proposal/s
2021- July 5% E
2022 following indicators are (child/Learner-centered)
expected: 1.
Conduct of consultative 3. Project Accomplishment
mechanism/s with the learners; Report; and
2. 4. PIR
Incorporating child-friendly
mechanism/s; 3.
Anchored on a learner-centered
principle; and T
4.
Manifestation of effective
school programs
implementattion
nt of Education
Capital Region
OFFICE - MAKATI CITY

MMITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

RESULTS
ACTUAL

SCORE*
RATING
5 4 3 2 1

all MOVs as
specified in the only 4 MOVs were only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs were Only 1 MOV was
objectives were met met met met
met

95-100% of the 90-94%% of the 85-89% of the the 80-84% of the the 75-79% of the the
AIP were the AIP were AIP were AIP were AIP were
implemented. implemented. implemented. implemented. implemented.

PPAs were PPAs were PPAs were

PPAs were PPAs were
implemented one implemented two implemented 3
implemented implemented on
weeks after the weeks after the weeks or more after
before the end of time as scheduled
scheduled time for scheduled time for the scheduled time
the school year. for the school year.
the school year. the school year. for the school year.

all MOVs as *** If None of the

specified in the only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs were only 1 MOV was MOVs was met
objectives were met met met will be scored
met ZERO

BE-LCP BE-LCP BE-LCP

BE-LCP BE-LCP
Implementation Implementation Implementation
Implementation Implementation
report has been report has been report has been
report has been report has been
submiited 1 week submiited 2 weeks submiited 3 weeks
submiited before submiited on the
after the scheduled after the scheduled or more after the
the scheduled time scheduled time
time time scheduled time
Implementation Implementation
report has been report has been report has been
report has been report has been
submiited 1 week submiited 2 weeks submiited 3 weeks
submiited before submiited on the
after the scheduled after the scheduled or more after the
the scheduled time scheduled time
time time scheduled time

all MOVs as
specified in the only 2 MOVs were only 1 MOVs was *** If None of the MOVs was met will
objectives were met met be scored ZERO
met

The proposed
The proposed
research has been The proposed At least submitted a
research has been The proposed
completed and research has been resesarch proposal
completed and research has been
presented/utilized completed before with a research tool
presented/utilized completed within
the findings before the end of the within the school
the findings within the school year
the end of the school year year
the school year
school year

all MOVs as *** If None of the

specified in the only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs were only 1 MOV was MOVs was met
objectives were met met met will be scored
met ZERO

95-100% of the 90-94%% of the 80-84% of the 75-79%% of the

85-89%of the PPAs
PPAs were PPAs were PPAs were PPAs were
were implemented
implemented implemented implemented implemented

PPAs were PPAs were PPAs were

PPAs were PPAs were
implemented one implemented two implemented 3
implemented implemented on
week after the weeks after the weeks or more after
before the end of time as scheduled
scheduled time for scheduled time for the scheduled time
the school year. for the school year.
the school year. the school year. for the school year.
 Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MAKATI

OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIE

Name of Employee:
Position: School Head
Review Period: Weight per SY 2021-2022

Weight per
Objective
Timeline

MFOs+A1 PERF
KRA

1:P12+A1 KRAs Strands/Objectives MOV's

1:M12
5
Managing School Operations and Resources

2.1 Records Management Q all MOVs were met

BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Demonstrate skills in
maintaining school data and
other pertinent records/data
* The following MOVs:
indicators are to be evaluated: 1.
1. Updated
Strategic data generation using EBEIS/LIS
October
technolgy (ICT) ; 2. Data
2021- July 5%
2. capture
2022 E
Systematic data management; 3. 95-100% of
3. Training SCORE documentss/records
and development of Record 4. are completed within
officer/ personnel; and E-Forms (All SFs) the school year and
4. submitted before the
Acccessibility of due date
documents/data needed by the
stakeholders
T

Q all MOVs were met

2.2 Financial Management

Displayed knowledge MOVs :
and understanding in Fiscal
management and resources
October 2020- July 2021

utilization in accordance with 95-100% of the MOOE

1. APP aligned allocated for the SY
existing rules and regulations E
with AIP were utilized and
*The following are the
2. liquidated
5% indicators: Liquidation
1. systematic and transparent Report
utilization of funds ; 3.
2.
Transparency
updated and orderly liquidation Board (Passbook,
of funds; 3. updated
Website, BAC
and orderly canteen report; and records) ;
4. Effective management
of resources
 *The following are the
2.

October 2020- J
indicators:
5% Liquidation
1. systematic and transparent
utilization of funds ; Report
2. 3.
updated and orderly liquidation Transparency
of funds; 3. updated Board (Passbook,
and orderly canteen report; and Website, BAC
4. Effective management records) ;
of resources MOOE for the SY are
liquidated and
T
submitted before the
scheduled date

2.3 School Facilities and

Equipment Manage Q all MOVs were met
school facilities and equipment. MOVs:
October 2021- July 2022

*The following
are the indicators: 1. Evidence
of current school
1. well-conducive school
situation
learning environment ;
25% 5% 2. orderly (Pictures,
narrative, etc) E
school Inventory records ;
3. Records of physical PSDS Tool
facilities management; & 2. School Required reports were
4. Inventory Report submitted ahead of the
Compliance to the IATF Health due date
Protocols T

Q all MOVs were met

2.4 Management of Staff
Manage staff in
adherence to laws
*The folllowing MOVs:
October 2020-July 2021

are the indicators:

1. Maintained adherence to 1. Class Program
policy on teaching load 2.
distribution ; Teacher's
2. Established program
3. SF 7 E
5% collaboration with the school
organizations like FEA, PTA, & (Validated by 95-100% of staf and
PSDS) teachers were given
others;
4. the prescribed load and
3. Conduct of program/s for
School INSET were were given
staff development and welfare;
5. training within the
and
LAC/PLC/TQC rating period
4. Adopted empowerment
and dynamism in the
governance of the school
T
Managing School Operations and Resource
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

2.5 School Safety for disaster MOVs:

preparedness, mitigation and
resilency 1. Evidences
2.6 Emerging of SDRRMC
opportunities and challenges activities (BERT,
Demonstrate Task Force COVID, Q all MOVs were met
Management Skills in and others)
promoting school safety for 2. Evidences of
disaster preparedness, conducted
mitigation and sresiliency to Earthquake drills
ensure continuous delivery of 3. Evidences of
instruction . The following conducted fire
indicators are to be observed: drills
4. Evidences of
1. compliance to
Institutionalized SDRRM safety protocols
measures and mechanisms; (COVID -19 safety
protocols)
2. Conduct of regular
disaster drills (Fire, 5. BE-LCP
Earthquake); (Contingency/Ope
3. rationalization
5% Conduct of regular inspection Plan)
 Management Skills in and others)

Managing School Operati

BASIC EDUCATIO
promoting school safety for 2. Evidences of
disaster preparedness, conducted
mitigation and sresiliency to Earthquake drills
ensure continuous delivery of 3. Evidences of
instruction . The following conducted fire
indicators are to be observed: drills
4. Evidences of
1. compliance to
Institutionalized SDRRM safety protocols
measures and mechanisms; (COVID -19 safety
protocols) 90-100% of all
2. Conduct of regular SDRRMC/Safety PPAs
disaster drills (Fire, 5. BE-LCP E were carried out before
Earthquake); (Contingency/Ope the target date of
3. rationalization completion
5% Conduct of regular inspection Plan)
on safety protocols and
mitigation measures; and
4.
Strengthening emergency
response and safety
mechanisms in school

T
of Education
pital Region
FFICE - MAKATI CITY

MITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

RESULTS
ACTUAL

SCORE*
RATING
4 3 2 1

*** If None of the

only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs were
only 1 MOV was met MOVs was met will be
met met scored ZERO

75-79 % of
90-94% of 85-89% of 80-84% of
documentss/records
documentss/records documentss/records documentss/records
are completed within
are completed within are completed within are completed within
the school year and
the school year and the school year and the school year and
submitted 3 weeks or
submitted within the submitted 1 week submitted 2 weeks
more after the due
due date after the due date after the due date
date

*** If None of the

only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs were
only 1 MOV was met MOVs was met will be
met met
scored Zero

90-94% of the MOOE 85-89% of the MOOE 80-84% of the MOOE 75-79%of the MOOE
allocated for the SY allocated for the SY allocated for the SY allocated for the SY
were utilized and were utilized and were utilized and were utilized and
liquidated liquidated liquidated liquidated
 MOOE for the SY are
MOOE for the SY are MOOE for the SY are MOOE for the SY are liquidated and
liquidated and liquidated and liquidated and
submitted 3 months
submitted on the submitted 1 month submitted 2 months
or more after
scheduled date after scheduled date after scheduled date
scheduled date

*** If None of the

only 1 MOV was met MOVs was met will be
scored Zero

Required reports Required reports Required reports Required reports were

were submitted 1 were submitted 2 submitted 3 weeks or
were submitted on
week after the due weeks after the due more after the due
time
date date date

only 4 MOVs were only 3 MOVs were

only 2 MOV were met Only 1 MOV was met
met met

85-89% of staff and 80-84% of staff and Less than 75-79% of

90-94% of staff and teachers with teachers with staff and teachers
teachers were given ancillary functions ancillary functions with ancillary
the prescribed load were given training were given training functions were given
and were were given within the rating within the rating training within the
training within the period and done two period and done rating period and
rating period weeks later than the three weeks later done a month later
target date than the target date than the target date

only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs were None of the MOVs

met met only 1 MOV was met was met
80-89% of all 70-79% of all SDRRMC 60-69% of all Less than 60% of all
SDRRMC prrograms in prrograms in the PPA SDRRMC prrograms in SDRRMC prrograms in
the PPA were carried were carried out the PPA were carried the PPA were carried
within or a week after out 2 weeks after the out 2 weeks or more
out within the target
the target date of target date of after the target date
date of completion
completion completion of completion
 Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MAKATI CITY

OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (O

Name of Employee:
Position: School Head
Review Period: SY 2021-2022
Weight per

Weight per
Timeline

Objective

PERFORM
KRA

MFOs KRAs Strands/Objectives MOV's

5
all MOVs
were met
Q
3.1 School-based review ,
contextualization and
implementation of learning
standards 3.2 Teaching standards MOVs:. 100% of
Focusing on Teaching and Learning

and pedagogies (Provided 1. COT/ teachers were

BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

technical assistance to teachers on Observation notes (DM 04, provided TA

teaching standards and pedagogies S. 2022) 2. TA within the
within and accross learning areas to Plan on teaching and school year
E
improve their teaching practice.) learning process / Coaching
Display mastery of the teaching and Mentoring report
standards and pedagogies by 3.
October
providing technical assistance and LAC sessions
2021- July 30% 10%
performance feedback to teachers documentations,
2022 The TA Plan
* The Instructional Supervisory
following are the indicators: Plan was carried
1. Conduct of class observation; 4. Performance out before the
2. Provision for Monitoringand Coaching target date of
mentoring and coaching mechanism; Form (PMCF) completion
3. 5. PLC/PTC narrative
Engagement on Instructional reports ***
supervision; and Based on DM 04, S. 2022 T
4.
Establishment of teaching support
mechanism

MOVs:
1. All of the All a,b,c
following: a. required
DILLAS Result/School Q MOVs in
Assessment Scheme; Number 1
3.4 Learner Achievement and other SCORE Results were met
performance indicators b.
3.5 Learning Summative or Performance
assessment Assessment summary in all
Provide learning assessment tools subject areas or grade level
and strategies as well as utilizing the c.
same to improve learner achievement School-based Literacy and
*** numeracy assessment
The following indicators are desired: results for Elementary and
1. Conduct NEO-LMS for High School
of authentic and strategic learner 2. Evidences of
assessment; conducted Technical
10%
2. Provision of technical Assistance for teachers (TA
assitance on designing assessment Plan, TA Tool,
tools, its implementation and Worksheet/Agreement)
 Assessment Scheme;
3.4 Learner Achievement and other SCORE Results
performance indicators b.
3.5 Learning Summative or Performance
assessment Assessment summary in all
Provide learning assessment tools subject areas or grade level
and strategies as well as utilizing the c.
same to improve learner achievement School-based Literacy and
*** numeracy assessment
The following indicators are desired: results for Elementary and
1. Conduct NEO-LMS for High School
of authentic and strategic learner 2. Evidences of
assessment; conducted Technical
10%
2. Provision of technical Assistance for teachers (TA 90-100% of
assitance on designing assessment Plan, TA Tool, the scheduled
tools, its implementation and Worksheet/Agreement) assessment
utilization to improve pupils/ students 3. tools were
achievement; Evidences of conducted E implemented
3. Establish mechanism Interventions (Reading, before/within
of promoting learner achievement and enrichment, the scheduled
performance; and others)/innovations on implementati
4. Engagement of the wider assessment 4. on date
school community in developing data- Quarterly Assessment
based intervention Report (submitted through
the PSDS)
5. CIP Project/School-
Initiated Projects completed
focusing on Learning
Interventions to Improve
Learners Performance.

All MOVs
Q
3.6 Learning Environment were met
MOVs:
3.8 Learner Discipline 1. Validated
Manage reports on Child safety
and ensure a learner-friendly, measures in the school
(Physical facilities) All SDRRM
inclusive and healthy learning & Facility
2. Reports
environment while strrengthening on WInS Program, COVID improvement
learner discipline 19 Health and safety -related and
*** The indicators protocols, and other Learner
are the ff: relevent discipline -
E related PPAs
programs/activcities
1. Learner-friendly and conducive (MOVs from
10% 3.
learning environment; Guidance Program, and 1 to 5) were
2. other relevant records implemented
Provision of facilities that promote (Mental Health Activities, before the
Positive discipline activities end of the
health and well-being of learners;
of school) school year.
3.
4. Reports on
Insttitutionalization of discipline Brigada Eskwela Program
measures in the school; and and activities/Adopt-A-
4. School Program/Gulayan
Promotion of collaborative school sa Paaralan
5. SSAT Survey Result T
responsibility
CITY

EW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

RESULTS
ACTUAL

RATING

SCORE*
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

4 3 2 1
only 4 only 3 MOVs only 2 MOVs Only one MOV
MOVs were met were met was met
were met

90% of 80% of 70% of Less than 70%

teachers teachers were teachers were of teachers were
were provided TA provided TA provided TA
provided within the within the within the
TA within school year school year school year
the school
year

The TA The TA Plan The TA Plan The TA Plan

Plan was was carried was carried was carried out
carried out out one week out two three weeks or
on after the weeks after more after the
time/within target date of the target date target date of
the target completion of completion completion
date of
completion

only 2 of only 1 of the

the required required
*** If None of the MOVs was
MOVs in MOVs in
met will be scored ZERO
Number 1 Number 1
were met was met
 80-89% of Less than 60%
70-79% of 60-69% of the
the or less of the
the scheduled scheduled
scheduled scheduled
assessment assessment
assessment assessment tools
tools were tools were
tools were were
implemented implemented
implemente implemented
within the within the
d within the within the
scheduled scheduled
scheduled scheduled
implementati implementatio
implementa implementation
on date n date
tion date date

*** If None of
Only 3 Only 2
Only 1 MOV the MOVs was
MOVs MOVs were met will be
was met
were met met
scored ZERO

All All SDRRM All SDRRM All SDRRM &

SDRRM & & Facility & Facility Facility
Facility improvement improvement- improvement-
improveme -related and related and related and
nt-related Learner Learner Learner
and Learner discipline - discipline - discipline -
discipline - related PPAs related PPAs related PPAs
related (MOVs from (MOVs from (MOVs from 1
PPAs 1 to 5) were 1 to 5) were to 5) were
(MOVs implemented implemented implemented 3
from 1 to 5) 1 week after 2 weeks after weeks or more
were the end of the the end of the after the end of
implemente school year. school year. the school year.
d within the
school
year.
 Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MAKATI CITY

OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee:
Position: School Head
Review Period: Weight per SY 2021- 2022

Weight per
Timeline

Objective PERFOR
KRA

MFOs KRAs Strands/Objectives MOV's

4.1 Personal and Professional
Development
4.2 Professional Reflection and - Certificates on LDM
Learning
4.3
Professional Networks
Set personal and
professional development goals Capstone or Application
through building networks and
enhancing reflective practice.
*** The following are the
indicators:
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES
5
1. IndividualDevelopment
Plan Form (Parts II-IV
included)
2. 1 training attended. all MOVs were
Q
met
Course, SHDP and other
related Professional programs
and/or evidences of
professional development
training (Certificates, plaque.
Projects,others)
3. Evidences of
accomplishments like
Certificate of enrolment/
registration in conitnuing

education (graduate/post
At least 95-
1. Accomplishment of graduate, speakership and
Developing Self and others

other relevant documents 100% of

the OPCRF ; professional
4. Evidences of networking
October 2021- July 2022

2. Participation and activity like benchmarking development

E
completion of activity, MOA/MOU with programs were
DepEd-Initiated/sponsored other entities, membership in completed
professional within the rating
12% 2% Professional Programs; period
3. Innovation, Authorship, organizations/associations and
other relevant
and other Professional documents/proofs
accomplishments; and
4. Establishment of
professional networks and other
affiliations

The OPCRF for

the SY was
submitted ahead
T
of the
prescribed
schedule
 all MOVs were
Q
met

4.4 Performance Management

Implement the
Performance Management
System anchored on the PPST 1. Proof of conducted PIR
for teachers and the RPMS Cycle
for school personnel to improve 2. Compliance to RPMS-
office performance . PPST Guidelines ( Evidences
for all RPMS phases) 90-100% of the
*** The
3. Memo on teachers
following indicators are to be
PMT composition and completed the
observed: E
functions, Narrative/ RPMS Cycle
1. conduct of
Accomplishments Reports on within the rating
Program Implementation Review;
performance-related activities period
/ Summary of Teachers
2. ensure the implementation of
Ratings
the RPMS Cycle among the 4. Coaching & Mentoring
school personnel; Plan and Agreement forms
3.Conduct of monitoring and 5
evaluation of personnel Consolidated School IPPD
performance through the PMS; and Action Plan
and 4.
Observance of Mentoring and
Coaching program for teachers
teachers
completed the
T RPMS Cycle
within the rating
period

all MOVs were

4.5 Professional development Q
met
of school personnel
4.6.Leadership development in
individuals and teams
MOVs:
4.8
1. Teacher-
Rewards and recognition
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

Needs Assessment (TNA),

mechanism
other related forms of
Developing Self and others

Provided professional 90-100% of the

survey
development opportunities PRAISE
2. Evidences of this activity
October 2021- July 2022

through the implementation of E Programs set for

such as
School Rewards System the SY were
Meeting/consultation,
*** The following are implemented
LAC/PLC Session, and
tobe observed:
5% other forms of feedback
1. Conducted
mechanism
need-based assessment;
3.School PRAISE program
2. Consulted
and other program on
teachers and school personnel on
awards and recognition
their professional goals;
4. Form
3.
202,/Annual
Established rewards system to
Accomplishment report/
recognize employee
Records/Logbooks
performance; and
5.List of L@D Activities
4. Created
(Trainings Attended)
database on monitoring and
evaluation system on personnel
achievement/accomplishments
 tobe observed:
5% other forms of feedback

October 2021
Developing Se
BASIC EDUCAT
1. Conducted
mechanism
need-based assessment;
3.School PRAISE program
2. Consulted
and other program on
teachers and school personnel on
awards and recognition
their professional goals;
4. Form
3.
202,/Annual
Established rewards system to
Accomplishment report/
recognize employee all PRAISE
Records/Logbooks
performance; and Programs were
5.List of L@D Activities T implemented
4. Created
(Trainings Attended) before the
database on monitoring and
evaluation system on personnel scheduled date
achievement/accomplishments
KATI CITY

REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

RESULTS
ACTUAL

RATING

SCORE*
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

4 3 2 1

*** If None of
only 3 MOVs only 2 MOVs only 1 MOV the MOVs was
were met were met was met met will be
scored ZERO

At least 80- Less than 75-

At least 85-89%
At least 90-94% 84% of 79% of
professional
of professional professional professional
development
development development development
programs were
programs were programs were programs was
completed
completed within completed completed
within the rating
the rating period within the within the
period
rating period rating period

The OPCRF
The OPCRF for The OPCRF for
The OPCRF for for the SY was
the SY was the SY was
the SY was submitted 2
submitted 1 submitted 3
submitted within weeks after
week after the weeks after the
the prescribed the prescribed
prescribed prescribed
period of rating period of
period of rating period of rating
rating
 *** If None of
only 4 MOVs only 3 MOVs only 2 MOVs the MOVs was
were met were met were met met will be
scored ZERO

80-89% of the 70-79% of the 60-69% of the Less than 60%

teachers teachers teachers of the teachers
completed the completed the completed the completed the
RPMS Cycle RPMS Cycle RPMS Cycle RPMS Cycle
within the rating within the rating within the within the
period period rating period rating period

teachers
teachers teachers teachers
completed the
completed the completed the completed the
RPMS Cycle
RPMS Cycle a RPMS Cycle 2 RPMS Cycle 3
more than 3
week after the weeks after the weeks after
weeks after the
scheduled rating scheduled rating the scheduled
scheduled
period period rating period
rating period

*** If None of
only 3 MOVs only 2 MOVs only 1 MOV the MOVs was
were met were met was met met will be
scored ZERO

60-69% of the
80-89% of the 70-79% of the Less than 60%
PRAISE
PRAISE PRAISE of the PRAISE
Programs set
Programs set for Programs set for Programs set
for the SY
the SY were the SY were for the SY were
were
implemented implemented implemented
implemented
 all PRAISE all PRAISE
all PRAISE all PRAISE
Programs were Programs were
Programs were Programs were
implemented 2 implemented 3
implemented on implemented 1
weeks after weeks or more
the scheduled week after the
the scheduled after the
date scheduled date
date scheduled date
 Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MAKATI CITY

OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (O

Name of Employee:
Position: SCHOOL HEAD
Review Period: SY 2021-2022
Weight per

Weight per
Timeline

Objective
PERFORM
KRA

MFOs KRAs Strands/Objectives MOV's

5
5.1 Management of MOVs:
diverse relationships 1.(School
5.2 Management of Organization's
school organizations Documents )Evidences of all MOVs were
Built constructive school organization existence Q
met
relationships with (Minutes of Meeting,
authorities, colleagues, Certification of Election,
parents and other Certificate of Recognition
stakeholders in an issued)
enabling and supportive 2. List of PTA
environment for learners officers;
*** communication/engagement
The following are the like Meetings, letters,
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

indicators: narrative reports, and others

1. managed school
organizations to support 3. Program/project
the attainment of implemented in partnership At least 4 or
institutional goals ; with stakeholders like Brigada more
2. established regular Eskwela Report, Programs/Project
Building Connections

communication and documentation of a project, s in partnership

engagement with various and other related activities E
with
stakeholders; 4. stakeholders/part
10% 5% Partnerships with cause- ners were
3.formulated/conceptualize oriented organizations like implemented
d a program/project in Adopt-A-School program, etc.
collaboration with with MOA or documentation;
stakeholders; and benchmarking activities
4.
strengthened school
partnership with internal
and external partners

All
Programs/Project
s were
T
implemented
before the
scheduled date
 5.3 Inclusive practice

Exhibited inclusive
practices, such as gender
sensitivity, physical and all MOVs were
Q
mental health awareness met
and culture
responsiveness, to foster MOVs:
awareness, acceptance and 1. Action Plan /
respect in the school Implementation Plan
highlighting projects related
to PWD, GAD, others , GAD
*** these are the Accomplishment Report
indicators: 2. School's child
1. Provision of Protection Policy/ Child
activities/facilities for GAD Protection Committee, Anti-
bullying policy/
3% and PWD is/are present; Implementation Report 95-100% of the
2. 3. Homeroom Guidance PPAs related to
Provision of Program, SBFP inclusivity were
E
implemented
program/activities for Child records/documentation and before the
protection, anti-bullying other related reports.
4. Child Friendly School scheduled date
and students with special
System (CFSS), Health,
needs are in place; Nutrition and wellness
3. programs, IP program and
Provision for supportive other related projects
measures to students
needing physical, mental,
emotional support; and

T
4. Provision for special
programs/ projects to
promote culture,
individuality, and
uniqueness
5.4 Communication
5.5 all MOVs were
Q
Community Engagement met
Demonstrate
efficient school leadership
MOVs:
communication through
1. Evidences of
various community
school programs that show
engagements
community engagement like
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

*** The
SRC, Meeting with
indicators are: Four or more
stakeholders, SGPT Meeting
1. Conduct of
October 2021- July 2022

activities related
Building Connections

and other related activities

school programs involving to community
2. Evidences of E
varying stakeholders; engagement were
LGU engagement 3.
2. conducted within
Evidences of extension
Initiated/maintained the school year.
services like assistance to
2% partnership with varied
LGU-led activities
stakeholders , to
(Vaccination, quarantine
strengthen support for
facility, etc)
learner development , as
4.
well as school and
Certificates/letters for
community improvement
Benchmarking activities,
and engagement with the
Individual speakership, and
local government for
other voluntary education-
support;
related activities/platforms
3. Extension of community
that improve communicative
engagement to support the
competence
school; and
4. Lead in
enriching communication
opportunities through
various channels
 services like assistance to
2% partnership with varied

BASIC EDUCAT
LGU-led activities

Building C

October 202
stakeholders , to
(Vaccination, quarantine
strengthen support for
facility, etc)
learner development , as
4.
well as school and
Certificates/letters for
community improvement
Benchmarking activities,
and engagement with the
Individual speakership, and
local government for PPAs related to
other voluntary education-
support; Community
related activities/platforms
3. Extension of community Engagement as
that improve communicative
engagement to support the reflected in the
competence T
school; and AIP were
4. Lead in implemented
enriching communication before the
opportunities through scheduled date
various channels

NAME
School Head OIC, Assistant Schools Division Superintende
Ratee Rater
KATI CITY

EVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

RESULTS
ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SCORE*
4 3 2 1

*** If None of
only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs only 1 MOV was the MOVs was
met were met met met will be
scored ZERO

At least 2 At least 1 No
At least 3 Programs/Project Program/Project Program/Project
Programs/Projects s in partnership in partnership in partnership
in partnership with with with with
stakeholders/partner stakeholders/part stakeholders/part stakeholders/part
s were implemented ners were ners was ners was
implemented implemented implemented

All All
All All
Programs/Project Programs/Project
Programs/Projects Programs/Project
s were s were
were implemented s were not
implemented a implemented 2
within the implemented as
week after the weeks after the
scheduled date scheduled
scheduled date scheduled date
 *** If None of
only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs only 1 MOV was the MOVs was
met were met met met will be
scored ZERO

80-84% of the
90-94% of the 85-89% of the
PPAs related to 75-79%of the
PPAs related to PPAs related to
inclusivity were PPAs related to
inclusivity were inclusivity were
implemented a inclusivity were
implemented before implemented
week or two after implemented as
or within the within the
the scheduled scheduled
scheduled date scheduled date
date

*** If None of
only 3 MOVs were only 2 MOVs only 1 MOV was the MOVs was
met were met met met will be
scored ZERO

Three activities Two activities One activity No activity

related to related to related to related to
community community community community
engagement were engagement were engagement was engagement was
conducted within conducted within conducted within conducted within
the school year. the school year. the school year. the school year.
 PPAs related to PPAs related to PPAs related to
PPAs related to
Community Community Community
Community
Engagement as Engagement as Engagement as
Engagement as
reflected in the reflected in the reflected in the
reflected in the AIP
AIP were AIP were AIP were
were implemented
implemented a implemented 2 implemented a
within the
week after the weeks after the month after the
scheduled date
scheduled date scheduled date scheduled date

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS 0.000

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory

vision Superintendent below 1.499 Poor