Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research question
Table of content:
Introduction: 3
Research question: 3
Context: The matter of this topic. 3
Hypothesis: 4
Investigation: 4
Methodology: 4
Results 8
The relevance of the questions: 9
Overall results: 13
Treatment of data: 13
Conclusion: 15
Improvements 15
Bibliography 16
Appendix 17
Appendix 1 - a survey in English for Emirates 17
Appendix 2 -Answers for Emirates 21
Appendix 3 - Survey in Portuguese for Mozambique 23
Appendix 4 -Answers for Mozambique 26
2
Introduction:
Research question:
An investigation of the relationship between income and Environmental System
Values (ESV) in the United Arab Emirates and Mozambique for males and females
aged 14 to 71+.
Looking both countries; they must adapt themselves to protect and conserve
those species and promote a sustainable and renewable way to produce energy.
Comparing the pollution index, Mozambique has 71.66, while the emirate has a lower
value of 49.67 which can be justified by low environmental regulations in
Mozambique and the lack of technology to prevent pollution. Considering that the
UAE is a high-income country and Mozambique is a low-income country, it would be
3
Hypothesis:
Investigation:
In that investigation, the independent variable is the country income, while the
dependent variable is the ecological system value, and the controlled variable is
both countries Mozambique (low income) and Emirati (High-income country). The
methodology/material used in that exploration is the google surveys and social
media to share the questionnaire.
Methodology:
The survey was chosen to ask, apart from age and municipality, three questions related
to significant problems facing the world and connected to both countries, such as Ocean
pollution, population growth, and Overfishing. Also, one question directly related to the
environmental values was set up. The optional answers were developed so that the 1st
answers are always focused on the ecocentric view. The 2nd one is related to the
anthropocentric view, and the last one will be related to the technocentric view. The survey
was translated to Portuguese to be shared in Mozambique. It used the WhatsApp and
Instagram platform to gather responses. (Both surveys have the same content.) To avoid
bias, it was chosen to do a random survey, where any participant has an equal chance to
participate in the survey.
Follows below the survey’s questions in English 1: (For the actual survey see
appendix 1 and 2)
1 The images from the survey were removed - however check the appendix to see the full survey in
English, Portuguese and the answers.
5
6
7
Results
Analysing the central issue of Mozambique and its species protection, especially
marine species and UEA over carbon production compared to other countries, the
results showed favourable feedback from both societies, where mainly they assume
our responsibility in protecting the environment. Ecocentric perspectives were
regarded in both countries, while the difference between technocentric and
anthropocentric views was low. Therefore, it can be assumed that both countries
worry about the environment and urge us to save the environment.
The 1st part of the survey was used to identify the age group and from which
municipality of Mozambique or Emirati they come. The municipality would help to
understand if the location back group also impacts their ESV.
8
Age groups between 14- 20, 21 - 30, 31 - 40, 41- 50, 51 - 60, 1 - 70, 71 +
Dividing the 1st and 2nd part of the survey, to introduce the theme a very clear
question was made with easy definitions about each ESV. The 2nd part of the survey
has 3 questions, debating issues that impact both countries. The 1st question is
about ocean pollution, overpopulation and overfishing. The answers to each question
help to understand and determine the environmental value of each participant in the
survey.
Multiple questions are easy and quick to do. Therefore the survey became better
for the participants and less heavy to complete. Also, the fact that there are multiple
questions helps with the data analyses and more accurate comparisons.
The emirate has 7% of the world's concentration of fossils, and the emirates
have high carbon emissions. Therefore, their carbon footprint is about 8.44 per
person, being the 2nd world country being the biggest ecological footprint. However,
in recent years, it has been seen that Emirates has high aims to achieve
sustainability- for example, Dubai aims to have about 75% of clean energy by 2050,
Swaraj aims to save 30% of water by 2040, Abu Dhabi aims to have 50% of
renewable and clean energy - it was also observed new regulations and projects to
make the country reduce carbon emissions and pollutants. (Emiratesgbc.org. 2022)
Data analyses:
Tabel 1 - Survey questions and answers
9
Questions Questions
Table 1 shows both data from Mozambique and UAE from 35 participants.
However, the data is still not processed; therefore to analyse the data, the
12
information in the table will be broken down into tables, pie charts and figures to
focus on specific information.
Analysing table 2 clearly, we can see that both countries followed a pattern and
agree with ecocentric views, where we should change our lifestyle to live a better life
and make a balance with the environment. However, summing up all the answers,
we could see what there are slit differences as in Mozambique, 80 participants voted
out all the questions on option A - meaning an ecocentric view, while 65 participants
from UAE voted on option A. Another similarity that we could see is that the number
of participants who voted in option C is quite the same.
Overall results:
Since both countries have several municipalities, for this part of the exploration it
was chosen Maputo (Cidade) and Inhambane from Mozambique and Adu Dhabi and
Dubai from UAE. Those cities are the capital and the second most developed place.
In the table below only answers made by participants of the locations above were
accounted for.
Table 3 - Results only for Maputo(Cidade), Inhambane, Dubai and Abu Dhabi
Analysing closely those results it is observed that both countries indeed agree
that the best resolution is to change our lifestyle, however, the values for
technocentric views are quite similar and low, making us assume that even though
there are huge technological improvements, generally the society is unfamiliar with
how the technology would be able to reduce environmental issues.
13
Treatment of data:
Figure 1: Municipality (UAE)
According to the figure above, both countries follow a tendency to have more
beliefs related to ecocentric views than anthropocentric or technocentric views.
However, in Mozambique, we could see that the difference between the
Anthropocentric view and the technocentric view was larger - 1.53% than in UAE with
0.73%. Another aspect that we could see is that the UAE has more technocentric
views than Mozambique, showing that the UAE has a better acceptance of how
technology and humans can work together to reverse and protect the environment.
However, Mozambique has higher values for Ecocentric views than UAE, which can
be assumed that Mozambicans have more interactions with the environment. Linking
the ESVs values with the location voted, it can be considered that most of the
participants come from the capitals. Therefore, we could assume that they are in the
most developed part them and have a better income than the other parts of the
country.
Conclusion:
Overall, analysing both countries' pollution levels, it was seen that Mozambique
has higher values of pollution than UEA; this can be linked to the countries’ income.
Usually, less developed countries have high pollution levels due to low education and
regulations that protect the environment.
15
Improvements
The questionnaires had a range of 5 questions; regarding the data, we could
consider that the number of questions was a limiting factor. More questions could
have been done to address more issues that affect both countries, such as climate
change, to improve the exploration. Also, to improve the relationship between
income and ESVs in both countries, the survey could have been done digitally and
physically to get quicker results and participants, including participants who cannot
access the internet. Moreover, an equal number of participants could be made for
each municipality to reduce bias. Another improvement would be adding personal
answers where the participants could type or write their opinion about some
environmental issues and how they are daily affected.
Looking to other issues such as education and religion, which have affected how
both countries attribute value to the environment, it how to be explored how both
countries have similar cultural values. Therefore, a new branch of investigation
could be with the research question: How far do Mozambique and UAE share similar
social values that may affect their ESV?
Evaluation:
On the one hand, while obtaining data, it was regarded how effective the digital
distribution was in both countries, as 70 participants took part in the survey, being 35
partitionists per country. Also, the survey included participants from all the
municipalities and a broad range of ages, mixing the results to avoid bias.
On the other hand, some weakness to be analysed is that since the questioners
tried to be neutral, no income data from the participants was taken into account to be
compared, more questions related to other environmental issues could be
addressed, such as climate change and clean energy, and, the questionnaire
answers could also be rephrased to avoid bias and influence participants' choice, or,
to get more realistic results and understand the differences in values we could also
analyse their education and religion to observe how both countries differ.
16
Bibliography
Appendix
17
18