1844 r0 Afcons Agra Metro

Report No.
: 1844_AFCONS_Agra Metro Dated: September18th, 2021
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
REPORT
ULR No.: TC916921000000039P
(Revision-R0)
AT THE SITE FOR
AGCC-02
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TUNNEL FROM START OF UNDERGROUND
RAMP NEAR FATEHABAD ROAD METRO STATION TO END OF RAMP AFTER RBS
COLLEGE METRO STATION INCLUDING SEVEN UNDERGROUND METRO STATION
(VIZ. TAJ MAHAL, AGRA FORT, JAMA MASJID, S.N. MEDICAL COLLEGE, AGRA
COLLEGE, RAJA KI MANDI AND RBS COLLEGE) ON AGRA MRTS PROJECT AT
AGRA
SUBMITTED TO
AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

Regd. Office-Afcons House, 16, Shah Industrial Estate,
Veera Desai Road, Azad Nagar, Post Box No. 11978,
Andheri (w), Mumbai-400 053
TECHPRO ENGINEERS PVT.LTD.

(An NABL accredited Laboratory)
103, RATANDHAM, 12/483, McROBERTS GANJ,
KANPUR-208 001
PHONES: 0512-2525759, 09793209918
e-mail: info@techproindia.com
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION: ............................................................................................................................ 1
2. SCOPE OF WORK: ......................................................................................................................... 1
3. GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION: ....................................................................... 2
3.1. Geology: ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
3.2. Seismicity:................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
3.3. Geography: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
3.4. Climate: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
4. FIELD INVESTIGATION: ................................................................................................................ 3

4.1. Drilling ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.2. Standard Penetration Test. ................................................................................................................................................. 4
4.3. Disturbed soil sample........................................................................................................................................................... 6
4.4. Undisturbed soil sample...................................................................................................................................................... 6
4.5. Ground water Table. .............................................................................................................................................................. 6

5. LABORATORY TESTS:.................................................................................................................. 7
5.1. Field moisture content. ........................................................................................................................................................ 7
5.2. Bulk density ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7
5.3. Mechanical sieve analysis test. ......................................................................................................................................... 7
5.4. Particle size analysis test. ................................................................................................................................................... 7
5.5. Atterbergs’ limits test. .......................................................................................................................................................... 7
5.6. Specific gravity test. ............................................................................................................................................................. 7
5.7. Consolidation test.................................................................................................................................................................. 7
5.8. Direct shear test ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
5.9. Tri-axial Compression Test ................................................................................................................................................ 8
5.10. Shrinkage Limit test. ............................................................................................................................................................. 8
5.11. Free Swell Index B. ................................................................................................................................................................ 8
5.12. Chemical analysis on soil sample. ................................................................................................................................... 8
6. DETAILS OF SOIL STRATA:......................................................................................................... 8

7. CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS: ................................................................................................ 8
7.1. Open Foundation: .................................................................................................................................................................. 9
7.1.1. Shear Failure Criteria: ...................................................................................................................... 9
7.1.2. Settlement criteria: ........................................................................................................................... 9
7.2. Pile Load Capacity: .................................................................................................................................... 10
7.2.1. Design Parameters: ........................................................................................................................ 10
7.2.2. Computation of friction along pile stem ........................................................................................ 10
7.2.3. Computation of Cohesion along the stem of pile ......................................................................... 11
7.2.4. Computation of end bearing resistance ........................................................................................ 11
7.2.5. Lateral load capacity of piles: ........................................................................................................ 11
8. RECOMMENDATIONS: ................................................................................................................ 12
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
APPENDICES
APPENDIX-A……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14
APPENDIX -B: TABLE 1 to 5: SUMMARY OF TEST RESULT (BH-1 to BH-5)............................................................. 14-24
TABLE 6: CHEMICAL TEST ON SOIL SAMPLES……….............................................................. 25-25
APPENDIX -C: CHART 1-15 : FIELD BORE LOG CHART (BH-1 To BH-5).................................................................. 26-40
APPENDIX- D: PLOTS 1-5 LITHOLOGICAL PLOT (BH-1 to BH-5)……….............................................................. 41-45
APPENDIX- E: CURVE 1-4: GRAIN SIZE CURVE (BH-1 to BH-5)…………….......................................................... 46-59
APPENDIX- F: PLOT 1-3: OBSERVED Vs CORRECTED SPT (BH-1 to BH-5)................................................. 50-52
APPENDIX –G:GRAPH-1-3 DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH………….…………...................................................... 53-55
APPENDIX -H: GRAPH 1-3: TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST GRAPH ………………..……............................... 56-58
APPENDIX –I: TABLE-1 COMPUTATION BASED ON SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA.......................................... 59-59
TABLE-2 COMPUTATION BASED ON SETTLEMENT CRITERIA............................................... 60-60
TABLE-3 COMPUTATION OF PILE LOAD CAPACITY............................................................... 61-64
TABLE-4 COMPUTATION OF LATERAL LOAD CAPACITY ...................................................... 65-65
APPENDIX-J SITE PHOTOGRAPHS................................................................................................... 66-66
APPENDIX-K LABORATORY PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................................... 68-69
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
TECHPROENGINEERSPVT.LTD. 103 Ratan Dham, 12/483 McRoberts Ganj,Kanpur-208001
Tel.: 0512-2525759, 09793209918
e-mail: info@techproindia.com
Web site: www.techproindia.com
September 18th, 2021
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S
We feel pleasure to submit the test report of pre tender Geotechnical
investigation conducted at site for proposed Package AGCC 02: Design and
Construction of Tunnel from start of underground ramp Near Fatehabad road metro
station to end of ramp after RBS college metro station including seven underground
metro station viz. Taj Mahal, Agra Fort, Jama Masjid, S.N. Medical College, Agra
College, Raja Ki Mandi & RBS College on Agra MRTS project at Agra, Uttar Pradesh
We convey hereby our sincere thanks to Mr. M.K. Ajayakumar, Vice President,
AFCONS Infrastructure Ltd. Mumbai, for his trust shown to us by awarding the work of
Geotechnical investigation.
We are also thankful to our staff members for conducting field and laboratory
test, preparing the sketches and typing the report.
forTechpro Engineers Pvt. Ltd
(Arvind K. Garg)
B.Tech. (Civil), M.Tech.
Principal Consultant &
Managing Director
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Branch office: 131, Maitri, 28 IP Extn. Delhi- 110 092 Phone: 09717009918
TECHPROENGINEERS PVT LTD . . 1844_Afcons_Agra Metro
(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

Geotechnical Investigation at the sites for proposed Underground metro Tunnel & Station building under Metro
Rail Corridor from Fatehabad road metro to RBS College metro station, Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
1. INTRODUCTION:
This report deals with pre tender Geo-technical investigation at the

underground metro station sites for proposed Package AGCC 02: Design and Construction
of Tunnel from start of underground ramp Near Fatehabad road metro station to end of
ramp after RBS college metro station including seven underground metro station viz. Taj
Mahal, Agra Fort, Jama Masjid, S.N. Medical College, Agra College, Raja Ki Mandi & RBS
College on Agra MRTS project at Agra, Uttar Pradesh. The work of conducting the pre-
tender Geotechnical Investigation has been awarded to us through work order No. BU-UI/T-
2021-22/17/AJK/TR/AP/82 on dated 19-08-2021 by M/s Afcons Infrastructures Ltd.,which
includes investigation in field, laboratory testing of disturbed and undisturbed samples
collected from the site and submission of the test report.
Geotechnical investigation carried out, with the locations which were planned by the
client. Purpose of the investigation is to determine the nature and properties of soil strata in
the bore holes and representing them through log sections showing the levels, nature and
properties of various strata upto a sufficient depth below the level suitable for foundation,
proneness of site to artesian conditions, seismic disturbance and other engineering
properties of soil.
This report includes the detailed methodology of investigation, collection of
samples, field and laboratory test result including their interpretation/ analysis,
recommendations on the properties of soils required for design of foundation and
suggesting suitable type of foundation with safe allowable bearing capacity for safe and
strong foundation.
2. SCOPE OF WORK:
For the proposed structures, it is required to determine the safe

allowable bearing capacity together with necessary engineering characteristics of
underlying soil strata. Since the safe bearing capacity of soils must be evaluated on the
considerations covering shear failure and permissible settlement of sub-soil strata as per IS:
6403-1981, IS: 1904-1978 and IS: 8009 (part-I)-1976 hence the scope of work is as follows:
2.1. Mobilisation of all tools & plants along with accessories, materials, labours etc. at site
of work for drilling and testing work, including setting up boring and shifting to different
bore holes point etc.
Branch office: 131, Maitri, 28 IP Extn. Delhi- 110 092 Phone: 09717009918 Page 1 of 69

2.2. Exploratory drilling of 150mm diameter bore holes through soil deposits within the
proposed area of construction up to required depth.
2.3. Collection of disturbed soil samples at an interval of 1.50 meter in all the bore holes.
2.4. Collection of undisturbed soil samples at every 2.50minterval or at change of stratum

from all the boreholes.
2.5. To conduct Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at an interval of 1.50 m or noticeable

change of stratum in soil deposits in all bore holes.
2.6. Transporting all the disturbed and undisturbed soils samples collected during the field
investigation to our Geo-tech Engineering laboratory in Kanpur.
2.7. To conduct the laboratory tests on all the soil samples collected during field
investigation for determination of their engineering characteristics.
2.8. To compile the field and laboratory test results, working out the safe allowable bearing
capacity and preparing the report including detailed recommendations and necessary
precautions.
3. GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION:
3.1. Geology:
The district of Agra occupies a part of Indo-Gangetic plain and its major part
is underlain by alluvial sediments of Quaternary age comprising mainly a sequence of clay,
silt, sand of different grades, gravels and kankar in varying proportions. The alluvium was
deposited over the slopes of the basement of Vindhyan rocks e.g. sand stone, shale, silt
stone etc.
3.2. Seismicity:
Agra district falls under moderate seismic hazard region i.e. Zone-III and
earthquake magnitude of intensity of 7 on Richter scale as per latest Seismic Hazard
Zonation Map of India provided by Bureau of Indian Standards IS: 1893 (part-I), 2016.

3.3. Geography:
The region around Agra consists almost entirely of a level plain, with
hills in the extreme southwest. The rivers in the region include Yamuna and Chambal. The
deserted city of Fatehpur Sikri is about 40 km southwest of Agra. The sand stone hills near
Fatehpur Sikri and on the south-eastern borders of the district are offshoots from
the Vindhyan range of Central India. Agra is about 210 km away from the National capital
of New Delhi (via Yamuna Expressway), about 336 km from state capital Lucknow
(via Agra-Lucknow Expressway), and about 227 km from Kanpur (via Agra-Lucknow
Expressway).The city has an average elevation of 170 metres above sea level.
3.4. Climate:
Agra features a semi-arid climate that borders on a humid subtropical
climate. The city features mild winters, hot and dry summers and a monsoon season.
The monsoon, though substantial in Agra, is not quite as heavy as the monsoon in other
parts of India. The average monsoon rainfall during June to September is 628.6
millimetres. In summers the city witnesses a sudden surge in temperature and at times,
mercury goes beyond the 46 °C mark in addition to a very high level of humidity. Winters
are bit chilly but are the best time to visit Agra. The minimum temperature usually is in the
range of 6 to 8 °C.
4. FIELD INVESTIGATION:
The field investigation work at this site was carried out from
August 25th; 2021 to September 08th; 2020.The following investigation work was carried out:

4.1. Five numbers of boreholes of diameter 150mm were made within the proposed
station buildings. The boreholes were progressed using power operated winch
machine under percussion method of drilling. Casing was used to keep the borehole
stable. The records of achieved depth of bore holes have been given in the table
below and locations of boreholes have been reported in “BOREHOLES LOCATION
PLAN” in Appendix A.
Date of SPT Hammer

GPS Co-ordinate Ground
Sampler Drop Depth of
Investigation
Borehole Water
Type method Borehole
No. Table
Starting Ending (m)
Northing Easting (m)
Date Date
BH-1 27.201393 77.995168 28-8-21 31-8-21 Standard Wire rope 30.00
Not Encountered
4.2. Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at 1.50 metre as per the procedure in
IS 2131-1981 in all the bore holes. For conducting the test, the bottom of the borehole
was properly cleaned and split spoon sampler was properly seated in position in the
borehole. The split spoon sampler resting on the bottom of borehole was allowed to
sink under its own weight; then the sampler was allowed to penetrate 15 cm with the
blows of the hammer 63.50 kg weight falling free through 75cm, thereafter the split
spoon sampler was further driven by another 15 cm. For the 3rd and final drive, the
sampler was further allowed to penetrate 15 cm. The number of blows required to
affect each 15 cm of penetration was recorded. The first 15 cm of drive is considered
to be seating drive.
Structure of SPT Sampler

The total blows of penetration for the second and third 15 cm of penetration is termed
the penetration resistance N. The N’ values are indicative of the compactness/ relative
density of cohesion less soils and consistency of cohesive soils.
In case the blows count of SPT in soil (including the number of blows of seating)
exceeds 100, the corresponding penetration was recorded and this particular test at
that depth stopped. If the total penetration is more than the seating penetration of 15
cm, then breakup of blows count for 15 cm seating penetration and for remaining
portion of penetration is also given.
SPT ‘N’ values are correlated with relative of non-cohesive stratum as per BS: 5930
(1999) - for sandy strata and with consistency of cohesive stratum.
CORRELATION FOR CLAY/PLASTIC SILT CORRELATION FOR SAND/NON-PLASTIC SILT

Consistency of Penetration Value Relative Density of Penetration Value
clays sand
Very Soft 0 to 2 Blows Very loose 0 to 4 Blows
Soft 3 to 4 Blows Loose 5 to 10 Blows
Medium Stiff 5 to 8 Blows Medium 11 to 30 Blows
Stiff 9 to 16 Blows Dense 31 to 50 Blows
Very Stiff 17 to 32 Blows Very Dense Above 50

Hard Above 32
In this method, the sampler acts as a probe and the driving energy is supplied by
the fall of the drop weight. The values of ‘N’ depend on the compactness or relative
density of the materiel. In hard formations, the testing is discontinued if ‘N’ value is
found to be more than 100. It is termed as refusal.
‘N’ value depends upon degree of saturation and over burden pressure of the
formation. Silty fine sand and fine sand below the water table develop pore water
pressure depending on the in-situ void ratio which in turn affects the effective stress.
This change in effective stress influences the ‘N’ value considerably.
Terzaghi and peck have recommended a correction for ‘N’ values in case of
saturated silty and fine sand when the ‘N’ observed in the field is higher than 15
Modified value ‘N’= 15+ (N-15)/2.

Soil sample obtained from standard spoon sampler for all above standard
penetration tests were collected in the polythene bags of suitable size. These samples
were property seal, labelled, record and carefully transported to the laboratory for
testing. The results have been reported in Table 1 to5of Appendix B under the title
“SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS”
4.3. Disturbed soil samples were collected at every 1.50 metre interval and at significant
change of stratum. Soil from cutting edge of SPT samplers and retained in split spoon
sampler, used for Standard Penetration Tests was taken as disturbed samples. These
samples were placed without delay in adequately sealed polythene bags. Where the
collection of disturbed soil samples could not be collected from SPT samples, Shelby
tubes were driven and retained soil samples were obtained. The laboratory tests were
conducted on the collected soil samples and reported in Table 1 to 5 of Appendix B
under the title “SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS”.
4.4. Undisturbed soil samples were collected in accordance with IS: 2132-1986.
Undisturbed soil samples (UDS) was obtained at every 2.50 metre interval.
Undisturbed samples were collected using 100 mm dia. and 450 mm long MS tubes
provided with sampler head with ball check arrangement. Collection of Undisturbed
samples in very hard cohesive soils/ dense granular soils/gravels/ cobbles/ pebbles/
boulders, refusal strata is practically not possible and such collected samples will not
truly represent the undisturbed conditions. Immediately after taking undisturbed
sample in a tube, the adopter head was removed along with the disturbed material.
The visible ends of the samples shall each be trimmed off any wet disturbed soil. The
ends will then be coated alternately with four layers of just molten wax. More
moltenwax will then be added to give a total thickness of not less than
25mm.Thelaboratory test results have been reported in Table 1 to 5 of Appendix B.
4.5. The depth at which ground water is struck during boring was carefully noted and the
depth of water table was ascertained subsequently in the completed borehole. The
ground water table in the borehole was allowed to stabilize and measured after 8, 16,
24 and 48 hours. It was ensured that last two reading were identical. The records of
ground water table have been tabulated in Para No.4.1.

5. LABORATORY TESTS:
The following laboratory tests were conducted to determine the

engineering characteristics of sub-soils:
5.1. Field moisture contents were determined by oven drying method as per IS 2720
(part II)-2010. The results have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST
RESULTS” of Appendix B.
5.2. Bulk density of soil strata were obtained using Shelby tubes in accordance with IS
2720 (part XXIX)-1975. The results have been reported in table 1 to 5: “SUMMARY
OF TEST RESULTS” of Appendix B.
5.3. Mechanical sieve analysis test were performed in accordance with IS 2720 (Part IV)
- 2010, for the purpose of identification by grain size analysis, oncoarse part of the soil
samples and the results have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST
RESULTS” of appendix B.
5.4. Particle size analysis test by hydrometer method were performed in accordance
with IS 2720 (Part IV) - 1965 on the part of soil samples obtained after the sieve
analysis. The results have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST
RESULTS” of appendix B.
5.5. Atterbergs’ limits tests were performed in accordance with IS 2720 (part V)-2010
and results have been reported in table 1 to5“SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS” of
Appendix B.
5.6. Specific gravity tests were performed in accordance with IS 2720 (part III-sec. 1) -
2011 and the results have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST
5.7. Consolidation tests were performed on cohesive soil samples in accordance with IS:
2720 (part XV)-2011. The results have been reported Table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF
TEST RESULTS” of Appendix B.
5.8. Direct shear tests were performed as per IS 2720 (part XIII)-2016, on the
undisturbed soil samples obtained during the field investigation. The results and the
density of samples have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST

5.9. Tri-axial Compression Test under Unconsolidated Un-drained (UU) conditions as per
IS: 2720 (Part-XI)-2011 were performed on the undisturbed soil samples obtained
during the field investigation.The results have been reported in table 1 to
5“SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS” of Appendix B.
5.10. Shrinkage Limit tests were performed in accordance with IS 2720 (part-VI) -1972
and the results have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS” of
Appendix B.
5.11. Free Swell Index were performed in accordance with IS 2720 (part-XL) -1977 and the
results have been reported in table 1 to 5“SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS” of
Appendix B.
5.12. Chemical analysis on soil samples was performed in accordance with IS 2720
(Part-XXVI)-1987 for pH value, IS 2720 (Part-XXVII)-1977 for Sulphate & IS 3025-
(Part-XXXII)-1988 for chlorides and results have been reported in Table-6,Appendix
B under the title “CHEMICAL TEST ON SOIL SAMPLES”.
6. DETAILS OF SOIL STRATA:

The classification of soil stratum have been done with the
help of soil characteristics obtained in laboratory tests as per IS 1498-1978. The detailed
nature of the soil strata have been reported in table 1 to 5: “SUMMARY OF TEST
RESULTS” of Appendix B and represented through Lithological plots in Appendix D.
In general the soils found at this site consist of non-expansiveinorganic silt and
clays of low to intermediate plasticity&non plastic silty sandstill the depth of investigation. No
existence of harmful salts has been recorded in the soils found at this site.
7. CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS:

For the construction of proposed structures, two
types of foundations, namely Raft foundation (open foundation) and bored cast-in-situ
RCC pile footings(deep foundations) have been considered for computation of load bearing
capacity of the underlying soil strata. The safe allowable bearing capacity for the open
foundations have been calculated on the shear failure criteria suggested as per IS 6403-
1981, IS: 1904-1995 and settlement criteria as per IS: 8009 (part-I & II)-1976. The
computation of load bearing capacity of bored cast-in-situ RCC piles have been done as per
IS 2911 (part-1, section-2)-2010 for underground metro stations.

7.1. Open Foundation:
7.1.1. Shear Failure Criteria:
= Mixed (Interpolation in between General

Type of shear failure and Local shear failure)
Factor of safety (F.S.) = 2.50

Depth of critical water table = 0.00 metre (at Natural Ground Level)
Net allowable bearing capacity: = qna(kN/m2)
qna = (1 / F.S.) [0.667c NcSc dc + q (Nq - 1) Sqdq + 0.5 B  N SdW’]
Where,
B = Width of foundation (metre)
D = Depth of foundation (metre)
ᶲ = Angle of shearing resistance (degree)
c = Cohesion intercept (kN/m2)
1 = Bulk density of soil above of footing (kN/m3)
2 = Bulk density of soil below the base of footing (kN/m3)
q = Effective overburden (kN/m2) = 1*D
Nc, Nq, N = Bearing capacity coefficient based on initial void ratio e0
dc, dq, d = Depth factors
W’ = Water table correction factor
Shape factors
Sc, Sq, S = 1.00
Calculations based on Shear failure criteria have been provided in Table-1 of

Appendix-I
7.1.2. SETTLEMENT CRITERIA:

Since the soil strata in the influence zone, found at
this site mainly consist of silty sands of none to low plasticity, hence the computation of
settlement of different layers of soil strata has been done using SPT values.
Settlement for applied pressure (Sf) = (qs x Su x df x Rd)/ (W ’x100)

Where,
qs = Permissible pressure (kN/m2)

Su = Settlement for unit pressure of 1.00 kg/cm2

(As per IS: 8009 (part-I)-1976)
W’ = Water table correction factor
N = Corrected average SPT value
df = Depth factor
Rd = Rigidity factor = 0.80
B = Width of foundation (metre)
D = Depth of footing (meter)
The calculated values of settlement have been kept within the permissible limits of 100
mm for Raft Foundation.
Calculations based on Settlement criteria have been provided in Table-2 of Appendix –I
7.2. Pile Load Capacity:

For the design and construction of structures, Bored Cast-in-Situ
RCC Pile footings have been considered for computation of load bearing capacity of the
underlying soil strataas perIS 2911 (part-1, section -2)-2010
7.2.1. Design Parameters:
Factor of safety = 2.50

Depth of critical water table = 0.00 m (at Natural Ground Level)
Diameter of pile = 1.20 m
Cut off length = 1.00 m
7.2.2. Computation of friction along pile stem

Quf= Ki.Pdi.tani.Asi
Where,
Quf= Ultimate shaft friction (kN/m2)
Ki= Coefficient of earth pressure at mid-depth of ith layer
Pdi= Effective overburden pressure at mid-depth of ith layer (kN/m2)
Asi= Surface area of pile stem in ith layer (m2)
I = Angle of wall friction between pile and soil of ith layer (=ϕ) (degree)
ϕi= Angle of internal friction of soil in ith layer (degree)
 = Sum of all layers up to ith layer

7.2.3. Computation of Cohesion along the stem of pile

Quc= i.ci.Asi
Where,
ci= Cohesion in ith layer
Asi= Surface area of pile stem in ith layer (m2)
i= Adhesion factor for ith layer of soil depending of consistency of soils
= Sum of sum of cohesion of all layers considered
7.2.4. Computation of end bearing resistance
Qub=Ap (c.Nc+q.Nq+0.5. .B.N)

Where,
Ap = Area of the pile toe (m2)
c = cohesion of soils at pile toe(kN/m2)
 = Effective Unit weight of soils at pile toe (kN/m3)

B = Diameter of pile (m)
q = Effective overburden pressure at pile toe (kN/m2)
Nc=Bearing Capacity Factor (Recommended equal to 9)

Nq, N = Bearing Capacity Factor
7.2.5. Lateral load capacity of piles:

Qu= 12.E.I./(L1+Lf) 3
Where,
Qu = Ultimate lateral load capacity of pile (kN)

 = Permissible deflection (m) = 1% of diameter of pile
E = Young Modulus of pile material (kN/m2)
I = Moment of Inertia of the pile cross section (m4)
L1 = Cantilever Length of pile (m)
Lf = Length of fixity (m)
The detailed calculations of pile load carrying capacity in compression, uplift and lateral
load have been reported in table-3 & 4 of Appendix-I.

8. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Keeping in mind, the field test results, laboratory test results and IS
codes of practice the following recommendations are hereby made.
8.1. Pile foundation:

Bored Cast-In-Situ RCC Piles shall be provided for the proposed
structures. Cut off length of piles have been considered as 1.00 meter. Starting depth
of the piles have been considered at 15.00 meter below natural ground level. Length
and corresponding safe allowable load carrying capacity of piles shall be read from the
table below:
Pile Pile Load carrying Capacity (kN) Depth of

Bore
Location. Dia. Length Lateral fixity
No. Comp. Uplift
(mm) (m) (RCC:M35) (m)
8.0 2550 820
9.5 2720 950
RBS Inter
BH-1 1200 11.0 2900 1100 900 8.00
Collage
12.5 3050 1300
14.0 3200 1500
8.0 900 825
Raja Ki 9.5 1050 1000
Mandi 11.0 1250 1225
BH-2 1200 1050 7.50
Railway
Station 12.5 1450 1450
14.0 1600 1650
8.0 700 650
9.5 900 850
Agra 10.0 950 900

BH-3 1200 900 8.00
Collage 11.0 1050 1050
12.5 1250 1250
14.0 1450 1500
8.0 900 650
9.5 1250 800
S.N.
Medical BH-4 1200 11.0 1450 1000 700 8.50
College
12.5 1725 1225
14.0 2025 1450
8.0 900 625
Jama
BH-5 1200 9.5 1050 750 1150 7.50
Masjid, Agra
11.0 1550 1125

Pile Pile Load carrying Capacity (kN) Depth of

Bore
Location. Dia. Length Lateral fixity
No. Comp. Uplift
(mm) (m) (RCC:M35) (m)
12.5 1900 1550
14.0 2250 1950
8.2. Raft Foundation may also be provided for proposed underground station
buildingstructures. The suitable depth and corresponding allowable bearing capacity
shall be read from the table below.
Location Safe Bearing Capacity (kN/m2)

(Ref. Bore hole No.) 14.00 m 15.00 m 16.00 m
RBS Inter Collage (BH-1) 500 525 550
Raja Ki Mandi Railway Station (BH-2) 550 575 600
Agra Collage (BH-3) 550 575 600
S.N. Medical College (BH-4) 550 575 600
Jama Masjid, Agra (BH-5) 500 525 550
8.3. All depth referred in recommendation of SBC, have been measured from existing level
of ground.
8.4. Since all the locations incorporated in this report does not consist of harmful chemicals,
ordinary Portland cementmay be used for all civil constructions.
8.5. If any loose pocket strata are found during the excavation, the foundation shall be laid
only after ensuring that the same has been cleared and appropriate remedial measures
have been adopted
forTechpro Engineers Pvt Ltd
(Arvind K. Garg)
B.Tech (Civil), M.Tech.
Principal Consultant &
Managing Director

Geotechnical Investigation at the sites for proposed Underground metro Tunnel & Station building under Metro Rail Corridor from Fatehabad road metro to RBS College metro
station, Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
APPENDIX – A
BORE HOLES LOCATION PLAN

APPENDIX "B"
TABLE-1 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Bore No : 1 Ground Elevation : Same as road level Method of drilling :Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Diameter of Bore Hole : 150 mm Bore Retained using : Casing Starting Date : 28/08/2021
Location / Chainage : RBS Inter Collage Casing Lowered : 20.00 m Ending Date : 31/08/2021
FIELD TEST RESULT LABORATORY TEST RESULT
Shear Strength Consolidation Shrinkage &
SPT Result Grain Size Analysis Index Property Test on Rock Specimen
Parameters Characteristic Swelling
Pre-consolidation Pressure
Depth Below NGL (Meter)
Sample Reference No.
Angle of Friction (Deg)

Moisture Content (%)
Water absorption (%)

Moisture content (%)
Bulk Density (gm/cc)
Modulus of Elasticity
Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)
Classification of ROCK Classification of SOIL

0.50 D 1 - - - - - CL 6 2 1 38 44 9 10.33 - - 27 20 7 - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 U 2 - - - - - CL 0 0 1 34 47 18 6.80 1.61 1.51 33 18 15 2.68 UU 50.0 7.7 - 0.775 - 9 15 - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
1.50 D 3 13 29 32 61 57.00 - - - - - - - 7.97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.50 U 4 - - - - - SC 0 0 1 57 35 7 7.59 1.64 1.52 26 18 8 2.64 UU 37.0 8.6 - 0.737 - - - -
Clayey Sands
3.00 D 5 15 24 29 53 42.24 - - - - - - - 13.46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.50 D 6 17 36 39 75 49.76 ML 0 0 0 21 79 0 15.65 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
5.00 U 7 - - - - - ML 0 0 1 6 93 0 10.91 1.69 1.52 Non Plastic 2.65 DST 14.0 23.5 - 0.743 - - - -
6.00 D 8 19 42 50 92 53.86 - - - - - - - 8.78 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7.50 D 9 21 46 48 94 50.70 - - - - - - - 15.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of low plasticity
8.00 U 10 - - - - - ML 0 0 1 12 87 0 3.55 1.59 1.54 Non Plastic 2.66 DST 13.0 23.8 - 0.727 - 17 - -
9.00 D 11 22 56 - R - ML 0 0 1 25 69 5 8.26 - - 24 20 4 - - - - - - - - - -
10.50 D 12 24 54 - R - - - - - - - - 7.23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11.00 D 13 - - - - - CL 0 1 0 27 60 12 19.15 1.91 1.60 30 19 11 2.67 RUU 61.0 7.9 - 0.669 - - - -
12.00 D 14 32 52 - R - - - - - - - - 13.18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13.50 D 15 31 53 - R - - - - - - - - 22.66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
14.00 D 16 - - - - - CL 0 0 1 27 62 10 25.95 2.02 1.60 28 19 9 2.67 RUU 84.0 13.2 - 0.669 - - - -
15.00 D 17 35 58 - R - - - - - - - - 16.48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

APPENDIX "B"
Location / Chainage : RBS Inter Collage Casing Lowered : 20.00 m Ending Date : 31/08/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

16.50 D 18 24 38 44 82 31.36 ML 4 0 1 43 52 0 13.39 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of low plasticity
17.00 U 19 - - - - - SM 1 0 1 53 45 0 11.73 1.78 1.59 Non Plastic 2.65 DST 10.0 26.9 - 0.667 - - - -
Silty Sands
18.00 D 20 38 59 - R - - - - - - - - 10.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19.50 D 21 28 50 - R - CL 3 2 3 4 74 14 12.48 - - 34 21 13 - - - - - - - - - -
20.00 D 22 - - - - - CL 2 1 2 6 77 12 24.77 2.00 1.60 32 20 12 2.67 RUU 65.0 7.2 - 0.669 - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
21.00 D 23 42 55 - R - - - - - - - - 16.86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22.50 D 24 26 44 52 96 29.75 SM 1 0 1 63 35 0 14.40 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
23.00 D 25 - - - - - SM 0 1 2 65 32 0 18.82 1.90 1.60 Non Plastic 2.65 RDST 0.0 27.6 - 0.656 - - - -
24.00 D 26 19 38 62 R - - - - - - - - 7.39 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
25.50 D 27 43 50 - R - - - - - - - - 15.72 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
26.00 D 28 - - - - - SM 0 0 0 58 42 0 18.28 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Silty Sands
27.00 D 29 18 32 42 74 21.01 - - - - - - - 15.51 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
28.50 D 30 21 39 44 83 22.22 - - - - - - - 17.24 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
29.00 D 31 - - - - - SM 0 0 1 55 44 0 18.89 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 D 32 23 42 46 88 22.44 - - - - - - - 17.43 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Notations: UU= Unconsolidated Undrained Tri-axial compression Test on Undisturbed Sample, RUU= Unconsolidated Undrained Tri-axial compression Test on Remoulded disturbed Samples, DST=Direct Shear Test on Undisturbed samples,
RDST=Direct Shear Test on remoulded samples, R=Refusal strata (SPT Value>=100)

APPENDIX "B"
Location / Chainage : Raja Ki Mandi Railway Station Casing Lowered : 13.50 m Ending Date : 03/09/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm )
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

0.50 D 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 10.83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 U 2 - - - - - MI 0 1 1 2 74 22 19.00 1.84 1.55 43 28 15 2.70 UU 51.0 7.9 - 0.742 - - 21 - Inorganic Silts of Intermediate plasticity
1.50 D 3 10 14 17 31 32.92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.50 U 4 - - - - - CL 0 1 0 25 64 10 10.24 1.72 1.56 27 19 8 2.67 UU 32.0 8.8 - 0.712 - - 18 -
Inorganic clays of low plasticity
3.00 D 5 9 13 13 26 24.83 CL 0 0 1 12 79 8 14.56 - - 26 18 8 - - - - - - - - - -
5.00 U 7 - - - - - SM 1 1 0 57 41 0 8.98 1.71 1.57 Non Plastic 2.63 DST 6.0 28.9 - 0.675 - - - - Silty Sands
6.00 D 8 13 28 34 62 37.95 MI 0 0 1 8 75 16 21.17 - - 38 25 13 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of Intermediate plasticity
8.00 U 10 - - - - - MI 5 1 2 8 66 18 5.62 1.65 1.56 37 26 11 2.69 DST 35.0 20.6 - 0.724 - - - - Inorganic Silts of Intermediate plasticity
9.00 D 11 9 14 14 28 18.37 ML 0 1 1 23 71 4 13.54 - - 24 20 4 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of low plasticity
10.50 D 12 8 14 16 30 18.12 CL 1 2 5 18 59 15 14.82 - - 31 17 14 - - - - - - - - - -
11.00 D 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12.00 D 14 7 12 15 27 15.90 CL 0 1 2 12 73 12 15.42 - - 29 18 11 - - - - - - - - - -
13.50 D 15 9 14 17 31 16.43 - - - - - - - 17.78 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
14.00 U 16 - - - - - ML 0 0 0 30 70 0 18.40 1.91 1.61 Non Plastic 2.64 DST 13.0 26.8 - 0.640 - - - - Inorganic Silts of low plasticity
15.00 D 17 10 16 19 35 16.90 CL 2 1 1 25 66 5 13.50 - - 26 19 7 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity

APPENDIX "B"
Location / Chainage : Raja Ki Mandi Railway Station Casing Lowered : 13.50 m Ending Date : 03/09/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm )
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

16.50 D 18 12 18 21 39 17.33 - - - - - - - 15.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Silty Sands
18.00 D 20 15 23 29 52 20.49 - - - - - - - 18.40 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
19.50 D 21 17 27 33 60 21.90 CL 0 0 2 32 60 6 20.40 - - 27 18 9 - - - - - - - - - -
20.00 D 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21.60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21.00 D 23 19 30 38 68 23.14 - - - - - - - 19.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22.50 D 24 20 33 42 75 23.99 - - - - - - - 17.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
23.00 D 25 - - - - - CL 2 1 2 18 64 13 19.50 1.91 1.60 32 21 11 2.66 RUU 56.0 9.2 - 0.663 - - - -
24.00 D 26 18 39 45 84 25.26 - - - - - - - 18.40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25.50 D 27 23 45 56 R - - - - - - - - 17.60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
26.00 D 28 - - - - - CL 1 0 2 15 68 14 21.50 - - 33 23 10 - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 D 29 20 47 58 R - - - - - - - - 20.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
28.50 D 30 16 36 43 79 21.14 - - - - - - - 19.30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
29.00 D 31 - - - - - CI 3 1 2 10 69 15 18.70 - - 36 21 15 - - - - - - - - - -
Inorganic clays of Intermediate plasticity
30.00 D 32 17 37 44 81 20.74 - - - - - - - 18.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

APPENDIX "B"
Bore No : 3 Ground Elevation : 3.0 m down as road level Method of drilling :Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Location / Chainage : Agra Collage Casing Lowered : 19.50 m Ending Date : 27/08/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

0.50 D 1 - - - - - CL 5 2 2 10 71 10 17.01 - - 27 19 8 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
1.00 D 2 - - - - - SM 13 4 7 27 49 0 22.99 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
1.50 D 3 2 3 4 7 10.12 - - - - - - - 17.63 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Silty Sands
3.00 D 5 3 3 5 8 9.71 ML 0 0 1 22 77 0 17.25 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
4.50 D 6 5 8 13 21 19.41 - - - - - - - 21.65 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Inorganic Silts of low plasticity
6.00 D 8 7 12 16 28 21.22 - - - - - - - 20.36 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
7.50 D 9 8 15 23 38 24.24 CL-CI 6 3 6 8 65 12 23.52 - - 35 21 14 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Clays of low to Intermediate plasticity
8.00 U 10 - - - - - CI 0 2 1 8 73 16 12.31 1.77 1.58 37 22 15 2.70 UU 80.0 10.5 - 0.709 - - 14 -
9.00 D 11 9 19 29 48 26.85 - - - - - - - 12.89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of Intermediate plasticity
10.50 D 12 13 28 39 67 32.79 - - - - - - - 21.10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12.00 D 14 20 41 51 92 40.41 - - - - - - - 11.15 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Silty Sands
13.50 D 15 15 38 46 84 35.44 - - - - - - - 15.32 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
14.00 D 16 - - - - - SM 0 0 0 54 46 0 16.79 1.87 1.60 Non Plastic 2.65 DST 10.0 28.8 - 0.656 - - - -
15.00 D 17 22 45 56 R - CL 1 0 1 22 70 6 11.98 - - 27 20 7 - - - - - - - - 19 - Inorganic clays of low plasticity

APPENDIX "B"
Bore No : 3 Ground Elevation : 3.0 m down as road level Method of drilling :Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Location / Chainage : Agra Collage Casing Lowered : 19.50 m Ending Date : 27/08/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

16.50 D 18 23 48 60 R - SM 0 0 1 64 35 0 19.15 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
17.00 D 19 - - - - - SM 0 0 1 52 47 0 17.79 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
18.00 D 20 29 51 63 R - - - - - - - - 15.32 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
19.50 D 21 31 50 65 R - - - - - - - - 17.92 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Silty Sands
20.00 D 22 - - - - - SM 0 0 1 61 38 0 20.94 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
21.00 D 23 24 42 53 95 30.76 - - - - - - - 18.59 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
22.50 D 24 21 37 48 85 26.65 - - - - - - - 18.48 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
23.00 D 25 - - - - - MI-MH 2 2 3 2 71 20 28.60 2.06 1.60 50 33 17 2.70 RUU 82.0 6.4 - 0.688 - - - -
24.00 D 26 16 19 26 45 15.25 - - - - - - - 25.90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of Intermediate to high plasticity
25.50 D 27 18 24 30 54 16.75 - - - - - - - 28.70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
26.00 U 28 - - - - - MI 1 0 2 3 79 15 31.35 2.13 1.62 42 29 13 2.68 RUU 58.0 7.2 - 0.654 - - - -
27.00 D 29 17 26 33 59 17.15 - - - - - - - 22.97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
28.50 D 30 17 28 35 63 17.27 - - - - - - - 25.39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of Intermediate plasticity
29.00 U 31 - - - - - MI 2 3 5 4 75 11 29.93 2.13 1.64 37 27 10 2.67 RUU 64.0 7.1 - 0.628 - - - -
30.00 D 32 20 30 39 69 17.78 - - - - - - - 29.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

APPENDIX "B"
Bore No : 4 Ground Elevation : 3.0 m below as road level Method of drilling : Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Location / Chainage : S.N. Medical College Casing Lowered : 15.00 m Ending Date : 05/09/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

0.50 D 1 - - - - - CL-ML 4 2 3 14 70 7 11.65 - - 26 21 5 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silty Clays of low plasticity
1.00 U 2 - - - - - CL 6 2 5 29 47 11 8.61 1.68 1.55 25.5 17.5 8 2.67 RUU 65.0 10.5 - 0.723 - 10 18 - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
1.50 D 3 3 4 8 12 17.54 CL-ML 1 0 1 18 75 5 13.27 - - 25 20 5 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silty Clays of low plasticity
2.50 U 4 - - - - - SM 1 1 0 51 47 0 8.75 1.67 1.54 Non Plastic 2.63 DST 0.0 27.8 - 0.708 - - - - Silty Sands
4.50 D 6 5 10 12 22 20.27 CL 0 0 0 10 80 10 24.64 - - 29 20 9 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
5.00 U 7 - - - - - SM-SC 0 0 0 50 45 5 15.79 1.81 1.56 24 19 5 2.64 DST 5.0 28.4 - 0.692 - - - - Silty Sands with clay binder
6.00 D 8 6 11 13 24 19.37 SM 0 0 0 50 50 0 17.30 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Silty Sands
7.50 D 9 3 4 7 11 10.06 CL 0 0 1 16 73 10 16.59 - - 30 20 10 - - - - - - - - - -
8.00 U 10 - - - - - CL 8 3 5 14 58 12 10.42 1.74 1.58 29 18.5 10.5 2.67 UU 48.0 8.6 - 0.690 - - 16 -
9.00 D 11 8 17 19 36 21.76 - - - - - - - 14.69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10.50 D 12 8 18 20 38 21.24 - - - - - - - 17.65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11.00 U 13 - - - - - SM 2 1 0 82 15 0 5.39 1.70 1.61 Non Plastic 2.61 RDST 0.0 30.6 - 0.621 - - - -
12.00 D 14 18 36 40 76 34.48 - - - - - - - 11.73 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Silty Sands
13.50 D 15 20 32 36 68 29.84 - - - - - - - 18.18 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
14.00 U 16 - - - - - - 5 1 2 44 44 4 11.94 1.82 1.63 24 21 3 2.65 DST 10.0 26.5 - 0.626 - - - -
15.00 D 17 23 30 34 64 26.93 CL-ML 1 0 4 29 58 8 13.48 - - 27 21 6 - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silty Clays of low plasticity

APPENDIX "B"
Bore No : 4 Ground Elevation : 3.0 m below as road level Method of drilling : Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Location / Chainage : S.N. Medical College Casing Lowered : 15.00 m Ending Date : 05/09/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

16.50 D 18 24 32 36 68 26.91 - - - - - - - 14.67 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
17.00 D 19 - - - - - CL 1 0 1 17 72 9 15.33 1.85 1.60 30 19.5 10.5 2.67 DST 41.0 7.5 - 0.669 - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
18.00 D 20 26 34 38 72 26.87 SM 0 0 2 66 32 0 18.09 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Silty Sands
19.50 D 21 19 21 34 55 20.64 - - - - - - - 21.77 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
20.00 D 22 - - - - - ML 0 0 0 45 55 0 18.42 1.89 1.60 Non Plastic 2.64 RDST 0.0 27.2 - 0.650 - - - -
21.00 D 23 18 26 38 64 22.24 - - - - - - - 16.24 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silts of low plasticity
22.50 D 24 19 39 40 79 25.30 - - - - - - - 16.16 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
23.00 D 25 - - - - - SM 1 1 2 59 37 0 16.68 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
24.00 D 26 26 54 - R - - - - - - - - 23.28 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Silty Sands
25.50 D 27 31 56 - R - SM 0 0 2 82 16 0 22.16 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
26.00 D 28 - - - - - SP-ML 0 1 3 88 8 0 20.50 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - - Poorly Graded Sands with inorganic Silts of low plasticity
27.00 D 29 19 36 44 80 22.42 SM 0 0 3 84 13 0 19.94 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Silty Sands
28.50 D 30 20 38 46 84 22.46 - - - - - - - 14.16 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
29.00 D 31 - - - - - SP-ML 0 0 1 88 11 0 21.22 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
Poorly Graded Sands with inorganic Silts of low plasticity
30.00 D 32 22 40 49 89 22.63 - - - - - - - 22.16 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -

APPENDIX "B"
Bore No : 5 Ground Elevation : Same as road level Method of drilling : Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Location / Chainage : Jama Masjid, Agra Casing Lowered : 13.50 m Ending Date : 08/09/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m )
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
2
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

0.50 D 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 12.40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00 U 2 - - - - - CL 1 2 2 14 64 17 19.87 1.97 1.64 31.5 18.5 13 2.68 UU 40.0 8.8 - 0.634 - 8 18 - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
1.50 D 3 4 5 10 15 21.15 - - - - - - - 14.71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2.50 U 4 - - - - - CL-ML 2 1 2 22 66 7 11.28 1.88 1.69 27 21 6 2.66 DST 14.0 23.5 - 0.574 - - - -
3.00 D 5 6 18 24 42 33.79 - - - - - - - 11.52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic Silty Clays of low plasticity
4.50 D 6 8 22 29 51 34.74 - - - - - - - 13.57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5.00 U 7 - - - - - CL 7 1 1 31 49 11 12.07 2.10 1.87 30 21 9 2.67 UU 49.0 12.6 - 0.428 - - - -
6.00 D 8 9 23 32 55 33.19 - - - - - - - 15.11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7.50 D 9 5 12 18 30 19.55 - - - - - - - 18.88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8.00 U 10 - - - - - CL 5 1 2 17 64 11 21.97 2.04 1.67 31.5 20 11.5 2.68 RUU 58.0 8.8 - 0.605 - - - -
9.00 D 11 6 8 12 20 14.11 ML 2 1 2 12 77 6 22.16 - - 26 23 3 - - - - - - - - - -
10.50 D 12 3 3 6 9 6.78 - - - - - - - 20.43 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11.00 U 13 - - - - - CL 2 0 1 31 50 16 15.32 1.89 1.64 28.5 18 10.5 2.68 UU 62.0 8.2 - 0.634 - - 23 -
12.00 D 14 14 16 18 34 17.43 - - - - - - - 22.92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13.50 D 15 14 17 23 40 18.53 - - - - - - - 14.64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of low plasticity
14.00 U 16 - - - - - CL 8 3 2 15 60 12 14.20 2.07 1.81 31 20 11 2.68 RUU 60.0 12.1 - 0.481 - - - -
15.00 D 17 9 16 37 53 21.66 - - - - - - - 15.88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 -

APPENDIX "B"
Bore No : 5 Ground Elevation : Same as road level Method of drilling : Percussion Depth of Water Table : Not Encountered
Location / Chainage : Jama Masjid, Agra Casing Lowered : 13.50 m Ending Date : 08/09/2021


Compression Index
N1 (Seating Drive)
N3 (Second Drive)
Medium Sand (%)
Cohesion (kN/m )
Abrasion Loss(%)
Soil Classification
Core Recovery %
Nature of Sample
Coarse Sand (%)
2
Plastic Index (%)
Free Swell Index
Density (gm /cc)

Plastic Limit (%)
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit (%)
Shrinkage Limit
N2 (First Drive)
Specific gravity
Swell Pressure
Corrected SPT
Observed SPT
Fine Sand (%)
U.C.S (Mpa)
Type of Test
RL in Meter
Dry Density
Gravel (%)
Void Ratio
Point load
Hardness
R.Q.D %
(Kg/cm2)
Clay (%)
Porosity
(gm/cc)
Silt (%)

16.50 D 18 10 17 38 55 21.14 CL 1 2 3 17 68 9 18.67 - - 27 20 7 - - - - - - - - - -
17.00 U 19 - - - - - ML 9 0 2 20 61 8 14.40 1.98 1.73 27 22 5 2.66 RDST 13.0 24.6 - 0.538 - - - -
18.00 D 20 11 25 44 69 24.15 - - - - - - - 18.23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19.50 D 21 12 27 45 72 23.85 - - - - - - - 18.43 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
21.00 D 23 20 30 41 71 22.54 SM 1 1 2 78 18 0 18.86 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
22.50 D 24 21 32 43 75 22.57 - - - - - - - 18.21 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
23.00 D 25 - - - - - SM 1 1 1 72 25 0 18.79 1.90 1.60 Non Plastic 2.64 RDST 0.0 28.9 - 0.650 - - - - Silty Sands
24.00 D 26 29 52 - R - - - - - - - - 15.49 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
25.50 D 27 33 56 - R - - - - - - - - 18.34 - - Non Plastic - - - - - - - - - -
26.00 D 28 - - - - - CH 5 2 1 12 56 35 19.37 - - 65.5 24.5 41 - - - - - - - - 12 -
27.00 D 29 36 66 - R - - - - - - - - 18.45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
28.50 D 30 39 69 - R - - - - - - - - 24.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inorganic clays of high plasticity
29.00 D 31 - - - - - CH 4 4 3 8 60 34 15.65 - - 62 25 37 - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 D 32 42 70 - R - - - - - - - - 13.51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Geotechnical Investigation at the sites for proposed Underground metro Tunnel & Station building under Metro Rail
Corridor from Fatehabad road metro to RBS College metro station, Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
APPENDIX-B
TABLE 6: CHEMICAL TEST ON SOIL SAMPLES
Sulphate
Depth Chloride
BH. No. content as pH value
(m) content (%)
SO3 (%)
BH-1 1.00 0.048 0.033 6.37
BH-2 1.00 0.041 0.073 8.01
BH-3 1.50 0.027 0.033 7.16
BH-4 1.50 0.041 0.033 8.59
BH-5 2.50 0.110 0.033 8.97

APPENDIX-C
CHART-1: FIELD BORE LOG CHART (BH-1)

APPENDIX-C

APPENDIX-C

APPENDIXC

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX-D
PLOT-1: LITHOLOGICAL PLOTS

APPENDIX-D

APPENDIX-D

APPENDIX-D

APPENDIX-D

APPENDIX-E
CURVE-1 GRAIN SIZE CURVES

APPENDIX-E

APPENDIX-E

APPENDIX-E

APPENDIX-F
PLOT-1 OBSERVED SPT Vs CORRECTED SPT PLOTS

APPENDIX-F

APPENDIX-F

APPENDIX-G
GRAPH-1: DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

APPENDIX-G

APPENDIX-G

APPENDIX-H
GRAPH-1: TRI-AXIAL COMPRESSION TEST GRAPH

APPENDIX-H

APPENDIX-H
TECHPROENGINEERS PVT LTD . . 1844_Agra Metro_AFCONS

Geotechnical Investigation at the sites for proposed Underground metro Tunnel & Station building under Metro Rail Corridor from Fatehabad road metro to RBS College metro station,
Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
APPENDIX-I
TABLE 1: CALCULATIONS BASED ON SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA
Locations Bore No. B L D CWT Φ c e0 γ1 γ2 q Nc Nq Nγ Sc Sq Sγ dc dq dγ W' qna

BH-1 10.00 10.00 14.00 0.00 13.2 84 0.669 20.2 19.1 282.80 8.79 2.73 1.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.12 1.12 0.50 495.26
RBS Inter
Collage
BH-1 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.00 13.2 84 0.669 20.2 19.1 303.00 8.79 2.73 1.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.13 1.13 0.50 516.34
BH-1 10.00 10.00 16.00 0.00 26.9 10 0.667 17.8 17.8 284.80 18.17 9.01 9.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.23 1.12 1.12 0.50 1257.91
BH-2 10.00 10.00 14.00 0.00 26.8 13 0.640 19.1 19.1 267.40 19.45 9.97 10.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.10 1.10 0.50 1352.13
Raja Ki Mandi
Railway BH-2 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.00 26.8 13 0.640 19.1 19.1 286.50 19.45 9.97 10.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.11 1.11 0.50 1437.04
Station
BH-2 10.00 10.00 16.00 0.00 26.8 13 0.640 19.1 19.1 305.60 19.45 9.97 10.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.23 1.11 1.11 0.50 1522.92
BH-3 10.00 10.00 14.00 0.00 28.8 10 0.656 18.7 18.7 261.80 21.04 11.22 12.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.10 1.10 0.50 1489.72
Agra Collage BH-3 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.00 28.8 10 0.656 18.7 18.7 280.50 21.04 11.22 12.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.10 1.10 0.50 1583.75
BH-3 10.00 10.00 16.00 0.00 28.8 10 0.656 18.7 18.7 299.20 21.04 11.22 12.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.11 1.11 0.50 1678.83
BH-4 10.00 10.00 14.00 0.00 26.5 10 0.626 18.2 18.2 254.80 19.76 10.18 10.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.10 1.10 0.50 1302.56
S.N. Medical
College
BH-4 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.00 26.5 10 0.626 18.2 18.2 273.00 19.76 10.18 10.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.11 1.11 0.50 1385.09
BH-4 10.00 10.00 16.00 0.00 26.5 10 0.626 18.2 18.5 291.20 19.76 10.18 10.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.11 1.11 0.50 1472.11
BH-5 10.00 10.00 14.00 0.00 12.1 60 0.481 20.7 19.8 289.80 9.45 3.09 1.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.12 1.12 0.50 498.12
Jama Masjid,
Agra
BH-5 10.00 10.00 15.00 0.00 12.1 60 0.481 20.7 19.8 310.50 9.45 3.09 1.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.13 1.13 0.50 522.51
BH-5 10.00 10.00 16.00 0.00 12.1 60 0.481 20.7 19.8 331.20 9.45 3.09 1.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.14 1.14 0.50 547.20
TECHPROENGINEERS PVT LTD . . 1844_Agra Metro_AFCONS

APPENDIX-I
TABLE 2: CALCULATIONS BASED ON SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Location Bore No. B L D N Su W qs Rd df sf
BH-1 10.00 10.00 14.00 29.59 10 0.50 495.26 0.80 0.670 53

RBS Inter
Collage
BH-1 10.00 10.00 15.00 28.62 10 0.50 516.34 0.80 0.660 55
BH-1 10.00 10.00 16.00 28.62 10 0.50 961.54 0.80 0.650 100
BH-2 10.00 10.00 14.00 22.48 14 0.50 666.31 0.80 0.670 100
Raja Ki Mandi
Railway Station
BH-2 10.00 10.00 15.00 23.04 14 0.50 676.41 0.80 0.660 100
BH-2 10.00 10.00 16.00 23.04 14 0.50 686.81 0.80 0.650 100
BH-3 10.00 10.00 14.00 26.06 11 0.50 848.03 0.80 0.670 100
Agra Collage BH-3 10.00 10.00 15.00 24.76 11 0.50 860.88 0.80 0.660 100
BH-3 10.00 10.00 16.00 24.76 11 0.50 874.13 0.80 0.650 100
BH-4 10.00 10.00 14.00 24.93 11 0.50 848.03 0.80 0.670 100
S.N. Medical
College
BH-4 10.00 10.00 15.00 24.73 11 0.50 860.88 0.80 0.660 100
BH-4 10.00 10.00 16.00 24.73 11 0.50 874.13 0.80 0.650 100
BH-5 10.00 10.00 14.00 23.95 11 0.50 498.12 0.80 0.670 59

Jama Masjid,
Agra
BH-5 10.00 10.00 15.00 24.18 11 0.50 522.51 0.80 0.660 61
BH-5 10.00 10.00 16.00 24.18 11 0.50 547.20 0.80 0.650 63

APPENDIX-I
TABLE-3 COMPUTATION OF PILE LOAD CAPACITY
Dia. of Pile : 1200 mm Factor of safety : 2.50 Nc :9.00 Area of Pile Toe : 1.13 m2
Cut of depth: 1.00 meter Starting Depth :15.00 meter Critical Water Table: 0.00 meter
Effective Overburden at mid depth

Ultimate Shaft Friction Quf = Ultimate Shaft Cohesion
Layers (m) Ultimate Bearing Resistance = Ap *(c.Nc +q.Nq+0.5.g.B.Ng)
ΣKi.Pdi.tanδ.Asi Quc = Σα.c.Asi
Total Ultimate Load Capacity
Total Ultimate load Capacity

Area of Pile Stem Asi (m2)
Bulk Unit Weight (kN/m3)
Eff. Unit Weight (kN/m3)
Self-Weight of Pile (kN)

Eff. Unit Weight at pile
Safe Load Capacity in

Depth of Pile toe (m)
in Compression (kN)
Layer Thickness (m)
c at pile toe(kN/m2)
Compression (kN)
Length of Pile (m)
Borehole Number
Mean depth (m)
in Tension (kN)
Tension (kN)
ϕ ' at pile toe
ϕ δ Ki Qi ∑Qi c α α.c.Asi ∑Qi Nq Nγ q Qb
toe(kN/m3)
From
To
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF
16.0 16.5 16.25 0.5 0.5 20.15 10.15 5.1 1.9 8.1 8.1 1.0 1.4 1.4 64.0 1.0 120.6 120.6 16.5 8.1 64.0 10.2 2.1 0.7 5.1 668.3 790.3 14.1 136.1 316 63
16.5 17.0 16.75 0.5 1.0 20.15 10.15 10.2 1.9 8.1 8.1 1.0 2.7 4.1 64.0 1.0 120.6 241.3 17.0 26.9 10.0 7.8 11.3 9.1 9.0 264.1 4258.3 28.3 273.6 1703 126
17.0 18.0 17.50 1.0 2.0 17.77 7.77 17.9 3.8 26.9 26.9 1.0 34.3 38.4 10.0 1.0 37.7 279.0 18.0 26.9 10.0 7.8 11.3 9.1 16.7 363.4 4662.8 56.5 373.9 1865 183
18.0 19.5 18.75 1.5 3.5 17.77 7.77 29.6 5.7 26.9 26.9 1.0 84.8 123.2 10.0 1.0 56.5 335.5 19.5 7.2 65.0 7.8 1.9 0.6 28.4 726.6 4142.9 99.0 557.7 1657 282
19.5 21.0 20.25 1.5 5.0 19.96 9.96 44.5 5.7 7.2 7.2 1.0 31.8 155.0 65.0 1.0 367.6 703.1 21.0 7.2 65.0 10.0 1.9 0.6 43.3 760.1 4612.5 141.4 999.5 1845 485
BH-1
21.0 22.5 21.75 1.5 6.5 19.96 9.96 59.5 5.7 7.2 7.2 1.0 42.5 197.5 65.0 1.0 367.6 1070.7 22.5 27.6 0.0 10.0 11.3 10.6 58.3 816.0 6009.1 183.8 1451.9 2404 691
22.5 24.0 23.25 1.5 8.0 19.01 9.01 73.0 5.7 27.6 27.6 1.0 215.7 413.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 1070.7 24.0 27.6 0.0 9.0 11.3 10.6 71.8 981.9 6396.9 226.2 1710.0 2559 820
24.0 25.5 24.75 1.5 9.5 19.01 9.01 86.5 5.7 27.6 27.6 1.0 255.7 668.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 1070.7 25.5 27.6 0.0 9.0 11.3 10.6 85.3 1154.6 6800.6 268.6 2008.1 2720 964
25.5 27.0 26.25 1.5 11.0 19.01 9.01 100.0 5.7 27.6 27.6 1.0 295.6 964.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 1070.7 27.0 27.6 0.0 8.5 11.3 10.6 98.0 1313.4 7200.6 311.0 2346.2 2880 1125
27.0 28.5 27.75 1.5 12.5 18.48 8.48 112.7 5.7 27.6 27.6 1.0 333.2 1297.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 1070.7 28.5 27.6 0.0 8.8 11.3 10.6 111.2 1483.3 7601.2 353.4 2721.8 3040 1301
28.5 30.0 29.25 1.5 14.0 18.76 8.76 125.9 5.7 27.6 27.6 1.0 372.1 1669.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 1070.7 30.0 27.6 0.0 8.8 11.3 10.6 124.3 1652.1 8007.9 395.8 3136.3 3203 1492
16.0 16.5 16.25 0.5 0.5 19.1 9.1 4.5 1.9 26.8 26.8 1.0 4.3 4.3 13.0 1.0 24.5 24.5 16.5 26.8 13.0 9.1 11.3 9.1 4.5 245.9 274.7 14.1 43.0 110 26
16.5 17.0 16.75 0.5 1.0 19.1 9.1 9.1 1.9 26.8 26.8 1.0 8.6 12.9 13.0 1.0 24.5 49.0 17.0 28.6 0.0 8.5 12.0 11.2 8.8 183.3 245.2 28.3 90.2 98 53
BH-2
17.0 18.0 17.50 1.0 2.0 18.5 8.5 17.5 3.8 28.6 28.6 1.0 36.0 48.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 49.0 18.0 28.6 0.0 8.5 12.0 11.2 17.2 298.0 395.9 56.5 154.5 158 96
18.0 19.5 18.75 1.5 3.5 18.5 8.5 30.2 5.7 28.6 28.6 1.0 93.1 142.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 49.0 19.5 13.6 66.0 8.5 3.4 1.5 29.9 793.8 984.8 99.0 290.0 394 175





in Compression (kN)
Layer Thickness (m)
Compression (kN)
Length of Pile (m)
Borehole Number
Mean depth (m)
in Tension (kN)
Tension (kN)
ϕ ' at pile toe
toe(kN/m3)
From
To
19.5 21.0 20.25 1.5 5.0 18.5 8.5 42.9 5.7 13.6 13.6 1.0 58.6 200.6 69.0 1.0 390.2 439.2 21.0 13.6 69.0 9.1 3.4 1.6 43.6 877.2 1517.0 141.4 781.2 607 397
21.0 22.5 21.75 1.5 6.5 19.1 9.1 56.5 5.7 13.6 13.6 1.0 77.3 278.0 72.0 1.0 407.2 846.3 22.5 13.6 94.0 9.1 3.4 1.6 57.2 1183.5 2307.8 183.8 1308.1 923 634
22.5 24.0 23.25 1.5 8.0 19.1 9.1 70.2 5.7 9.2 9.2 1.0 64.3 342.3 56.0 1.0 316.7 1163.0 24.0 9.2 56.0 9.1 2.3 0.8 70.9 758.8 2264.1 226.2 1731.5 906 828
24.0 25.5 24.75 1.5 9.5 19.1 9.1 83.9 5.7 9.2 9.2 1.0 76.8 419.1 56.0 1.0 316.7 1479.7 25.5 9.2 56.0 9.1 2.3 0.8 84.6 794.1 2692.9 268.6 2167.4 1077 1028
BH-2
25.5 27.0 26.25 1.5 11.0 19.1 9.1 97.6 5.7 9.2 9.2 1.0 89.4 508.5 56.0 1.0 316.7 1796.4 27.0 9.2 56.0 9.3 2.3 0.8 98.6 830.4 3135.3 311.0 2615.9 1254 1233
27.0 28.5 27.75 1.5 12.5 19.3 9.3 111.6 5.7 9.2 9.2 1.0 102.2 610.7 56.0 1.0 316.7 2113.0 28.5 9.2 56.0 9.1 2.3 0.8 112.2 865.6 3589.3 353.4 3077.2 1436 1443
28.5 29.0 28.75 0.5 13.0 19.1 9.1 116.1 1.9 9.2 9.2 1.0 35.5 646.1 56.0 1.0 105.6 2218.6 29.0 9.2 56.0 9.1 2.3 0.8 116.8 877.4 3742.1 367.6 3232.3 1497 1513
29.0 30.0 29.50 1.0 14.0 19.1 9.1 125.2 3.8 9.2 9.2 1.0 76.5 722.6 56.0 1.0 211.1 2429.7 30.0 9.2 56.0 8.9 2.3 0.8 125.7 900.4 4052.7 395.8 3548.2 1621 1657
16.0 16.5 16.25 0.5 0.5 18.7 8.7 4.3 1.9 12.0 12.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 96.0 1.0 181.0 181.0 16.5 32.1 0.0 8.7 16.0 20.0 4.3 196.6 379.3 14.1 196.8 152 87
16.5 18.0 17.25 1.5 2.0 18.7 8.7 17.4 5.7 29.4 29.4 1.0 55.4 57.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 181.0 18.0 29.4 0.0 8.5 13.0 13.1 17.0 325.2 563.3 56.5 294.6 225 152
18.0 19.5 18.75 1.5 3.5 18.5 8.5 30.1 5.7 29.0 29.0 1.0 94.2 151.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 181.0 19.5 29.0 0.0 10.6 13.0 12.5 32.9 573.1 905.4 99.0 431.2 362 232
19.5 21.0 20.25 1.5 5.0 20.6 10.6 45.9 5.7 30.1 30.1 1.0 151.3 302.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 181.0 21.0 30.1 0.0 10.6 13.8 11.7 48.8 844.9 1328.5 141.4 625.0 531 335
21.0 22.5 21.75 1.5 6.5 20.6 10.6 61.8 5.7 29.1 29.1 1.0 194.5 497.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 181.0 22.5 29.1 0.0 10.6 13.0 10.3 64.6 1024.1 1702.2 183.8 861.9 681 455
BH-3
22.5 23.0 22.75 0.5 7.0 20.6 10.6 67.1 1.9 29.1 29.1 1.0 70.4 567.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 181.0 23.0 6.4 82.0 10.6 1.8 0.5 69.9 976.4 1724.9 197.9 946.4 690 497
23.0 24.0 23.50 1.0 8.0 20.6 10.6 77.7 3.8 4.5 4.5 1.0 23.0 590.5 69.0 1.0 260.1 441.1 24.0 7.2 58.0 10.6 1.9 0.5 80.5 770.0 1801.6 226.2 1257.8 721 639
24.0 25.5 24.75 1.5 9.5 20.6 10.6 93.5 5.7 7.2 7.2 1.0 66.8 657.4 58.0 1.0 328.0 769.1 25.5 7.2 58.0 10.6 1.9 0.6 96.4 805.0 2231.5 268.6 1695.0 893 839
25.5 26.0 25.75 0.5 10.0 20.6 10.6 98.8 1.9 7.2 7.2 1.0 23.5 680.9 58.0 1.0 109.3 878.4 26.0 7.2 58.0 11.3 1.9 0.6 102.0 817.6 2376.9 282.7 1842.0 951 906
26.0 27.0 26.50 1.0 11.0 21.3 11.3 110.1 3.8 7.2 7.2 1.0 52.4 733.3 58.0 1.0 218.7 1097.0 27.0 7.2 58.0 11.3 1.9 0.6 113.3 842.2 2672.6 311.0 2141.4 1069 1043





in Compression (kN)
Layer Thickness (m)
Compression (kN)
Length of Pile (m)
Borehole Number
Mean depth (m)
in Tension (kN)
Tension (kN)
ϕ ' at pile toe
toe(kN/m3)
From
To
27.0 28.5 27.75 1.5 12.5 21.3 11.3 127.0 5.7 7.1 7.1 1.0 89.5 822.8 64.0 1.0 361.9 1459.0 28.5 7.1 64.0 11.3 1.9 0.6 130.2 940.6 3222.3 353.4 2635.2 1289 1266
BH-3
28.5 30.0 29.25 1.5 14.0 21.3 11.3 144.0 5.7 7.1 7.1 1.0 101.4 924.2 64.0 1.0 361.9 1820.9 30.0 7.1 64.0 11.3 1.9 0.6 147.2 977.6 3722.7 395.8 3140.9 1489 1494
16.0 16.5 16.25 0.5 0.5 18.3 8.3 4.1 1.9 15.3 15.3 1.0 2.1 2.1 81.0 1.0 152.7 152.7 16.5 15.3 81.0 8.3 3.9 1.9 4.1 853.6 1008.4 14.1 168.9 403 76
16.5 17.0 16.75 0.5 1.0 18.3 8.3 8.3 1.9 15.3 15.3 1.0 4.3 6.4 81.0 1.0 152.7 305.4 17.0 7.5 41.0 8.5 1.9 0.6 8.4 439.1 750.8 28.3 340.0 300 153
17.0 18.0 17.50 1.0 2.0 18.5 8.5 16.7 3.8 7.5 7.5 1.0 8.3 14.7 41.0 1.0 154.6 459.9 18.0 30.1 0.0 8.5 13.8 13.2 16.8 338.0 812.6 56.5 531.1 325 246
18.0 19.5 18.75 1.5 3.5 18.5 8.5 29.4 5.7 28.5 28.5 1.0 90.2 104.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 19.5 28.5 0.0 8.5 12.0 12.1 29.5 469.6 1034.4 99.0 663.8 414 325
19.5 20.0 19.75 0.5 4.0 18.5 8.5 33.6 1.9 28.5 28.5 1.0 34.4 139.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 20.0 27.2 0.0 9.0 11.3 10.4 34.0 496.9 1096.0 113.1 712.3 438 353
20.0 21.0 20.50 1.0 5.0 19.0 9.0 42.6 3.8 27.2 27.2 1.0 82.4 221.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 21.0 27.2 0.0 9.0 11.3 10.4 42.9 611.2 1292.9 141.4 823.0 517 414
21.0 22.5 21.75 1.5 6.5 19.0 9.0 56.0 5.7 27.2 27.2 1.0 162.7 384.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 22.5 27.2 0.0 9.0 11.3 10.0 56.3 780.8 1625.1 183.8 1028.1 650 522
BH-4
22.5 23.0 22.75 0.5 7.0 19.0 9.0 60.5 1.9 27.2 27.2 1.0 58.6 442.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 23.0 29.0 0.0 9.0 13.0 12.5 60.8 969.7 1872.5 197.9 1100.8 749 559
23.0 24.0 23.50 1.0 8.0 19.0 9.0 69.4 3.8 30.0 30.0 1.0 151.1 594.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 24.0 30.0 0.0 9.7 13.8 14.5 70.5 1196.1 2250.0 226.2 1280.1 900 648
24.0 25.5 24.75 1.5 9.5 19.7 9.7 84.0 5.7 29.7 29.7 1.0 270.9 864.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 25.5 33.5 0.0 9.6 17.3 25.0 84.8 1821.8 3146.6 268.6 1593.4 1259 799
25.5 26.0 25.75 0.5 10.0 19.6 9.6 88.8 1.9 33.5 33.5 1.2 130.1 995.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 26.0 34.9 0.0 9.6 20.0 29.2 89.6 2216.2 3671.1 282.7 1737.6 1468 865
26.0 27.0 26.50 1.0 11.0 19.6 9.6 98.3 3.8 33.1 33.1 1.2 279.0 1274.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 27.0 32.3 0.0 9.2 16.0 21.4 98.8 1921.2 3655.2 311.0 2044.9 1462 1005
27.0 28.5 27.75 1.5 12.5 19.2 9.2 112.1 5.7 32.3 32.3 1.1 446.8 1720.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 28.5 32.3 0.0 8.3 16.0 21.4 111.2 2132.4 4313.1 353.4 2534.1 1725 1226
28.5 29.0 28.75 0.5 13.0 18.3 8.3 116.2 1.9 32.3 32.3 1.1 154.4 1875.2 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 29.0 32.6 0.0 8.3 16.0 22.3 115.4 2212.2 4547.4 367.6 2702.7 1819 1302
29.0 30.0 29.50 1.0 14.0 18.3 8.3 124.5 3.8 32.6 32.6 1.1 339.2 2214.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 459.9 30.0 32.6 0.0 9.6 16.0 22.3 124.9 2404.4 5078.7 395.8 3070.2 2031 1466





in Compression (kN)
Layer Thickness (m)
Compression (kN)
Length of Pile (m)
Borehole Number
Mean depth (m)
in Tension (kN)
Tension (kN)
ϕ ' at pile toe
toe(kN/m3)
From
To
16.0 16.5 16.25 0.5 0.5 20.7 10.7 5.3 1.9 12.1 12.1 1.0 2.2 2.2 60.0 1.0 113.1 113.1 16.5 24.6 13.0 10.7 9.3 10.4 5.3 263.9 379.2 14.1 129.4 152 60
16.5 17.0 16.75 0.5 1.0 20.7 10.7 10.7 1.9 24.6 24.6 1.0 9.2 11.4 13.0 1.0 24.5 137.6 17.0 24.6 13.0 9.8 9.3 10.4 10.2 309.0 458.0 28.3 177.2 183 88
17.0 18.0 17.50 1.0 2.0 19.8 9.8 20.5 3.8 24.6 24.6 1.0 35.3 46.7 13.0 1.0 49.0 186.6 18.0 24.6 13.0 9.8 9.3 10.4 20.0 411.8 645.1 56.5 289.8 258 150
18.0 19.5 18.75 1.5 3.5 19.8 9.8 35.1 5.7 23.2 23.2 1.0 85.2 131.9 11.0 1.0 62.2 248.8 19.5 23.2 11.0 9.8 8.6 7.8 34.7 500.0 880.7 99.0 479.6 352 251
19.5 21.0 20.25 1.5 5.0 19.5 9.5 49.3 5.7 23.2 23.2 1.0 119.5 251.4 11.0 1.0 62.2 311.0 21.0 28.9 0.0 9.5 13.0 17.2 48.9 829.2 1391.6 141.4 703.8 557 366
21.0 22.5 21.75 1.5 6.5 19.5 9.5 63.5 5.7 28.9 28.9 1.0 198.2 449.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 311.0 22.5 28.9 0.0 9.5 13.0 12.7 63.1 1008.8 1769.4 183.8 944.4 708 488
BH-5
22.5 24.0 23.25 1.5 8.0 19.0 9.0 77.0 5.7 28.9 28.9 1.0 240.4 690.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 311.0 24.0 28.9 0.0 9.0 13.0 12.7 76.6 1203.7 2204.7 226.2 1227.2 882 627
24.0 25.5 24.75 1.5 9.5 19.0 9.0 90.5 5.7 28.9 28.9 1.0 282.6 972.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 311.0 25.5 28.9 0.0 9.0 13.0 11.0 90.1 1391.5 2675.1 268.6 1552.2 1070 782
25.5 26.0 25.75 0.5 10.0 19.0 9.0 95.0 1.9 28.9 28.9 1.0 98.9 1071.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 311.0 26.0 10.0 159.0 9.0 2.5 0.9 94.6 1888.2 3270.7 282.7 1665.2 1308 836
26.0 27.0 26.50 1.0 11.0 19.0 9.0 104.0 3.8 10.0 10.0 1.0 69.2 1140.6 153.0 1.0 576.8 887.8 27.0 10.0 153.0 9.0 2.5 0.9 103.5 1852.1 3880.5 311.0 2339.5 1552 1122
27.0 28.5 27.75 1.5 12.5 19.0 9.0 117.5 5.7 9.5 9.5 1.0 111.2 1251.8 147.0 1.0 831.3 1719.1 28.5 9.5 147.0 9.9 2.3 0.8 118.4 1808.5 4779.4 353.4 3324.3 1912 1542
28.5 30.0 29.25 1.5 14.0 19.9 9.9 132.3 5.7 9.0 9.0 1.0 118.5 1370.3 141.0 1.0 797.3 2516.4 30.0 9.0 141.0 8.2 2.3 0.8 130.6 1777.8 5664.5 395.8 4282.5 2266 1951

APPENDIX-I
TABLE 4: COMPUTATION OF LATERAL LOAD CAPACITY
Cantilever length of pile
Permissible deflection
length of Fetidity (m)

Sub Grade Modulus
capacity of pile(kN)
Moment of Inertia
Youngs' Modulus
Concrete Grade
Stiffness Factor
Allowable Load
kN/m2/m (K1)
Dia of pile (M)
Average SPT
Bore No.
Location
L1/T
Lf/T
(m)
RBS Inter Collage BH-1 1.20 35 29580399 0.1018 35 5000 3.597 0 0 2.18 0.012 7.84 899
Raja Ki Mandi
Railway Station
BH-2 1.20 35 29580399 0.1018 50 6600 3.403 0 0 2.18 0.012 7.42 1062
Agra Collage BH-3 1.20 35 29580399 0.1018 36 5000 3.597 0 0 2.18 0.012 7.84 899
S.N. Medical
College
BH-4 1.20 35 29580399 0.1018 25 3300 3.909 0 0 2.18 0.012 8.52 700
Jama Masjid, Agra BH-5 1.20 35 29580399 0.1018 62 7900 3.283 0 0 2.18 0.012 7.16 1183

APPENDIX-J
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Extracting Undisturbed Sample Performing Standard Penetration Test
Disturbed sample from Split Spoon Sampler
Performing Standard Penetration Test

APPENDIX-J
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Extracting Undisturbed Sample Performing Standard Penetration Test
Disturbed sample from Split Spoon Sampler Extracting Undisturbed Sample

APPENDIX-K
LABORATORY PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDIX-K
LABORATORY PHOTOGRAPHS
End of Report

1844 r0 Afcons Agra Metro

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1844 r0 Afcons Agra Metro

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report No.

: 1844_AFCONS_Agra Metro Dated: September18th, 2021

AT THE SITE FOR

AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

TECHPRO ENGINEERS PVT.LTD.

3.3. Geography: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3

3.4. Climate: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

4. FIELD INVESTIGATION: ................................................................................................................ 3

4.5. Ground water Table. .............................................................................................................................................................. 6

6. DETAILS OF SOIL STRATA:......................................................................................................... 8

TABLE 6: CHEMICAL TEST ON SOIL SAMPLES……….............................................................. 25-25

APPENDIX- D: PLOTS 1-5 LITHOLOGICAL PLOT (BH-1 to BH-5)……….............................................................. 41-45

APPENDIX- E: CURVE 1-4: GRAIN SIZE CURVE (BH-1 to BH-5)…………….......................................................... 46-59

APPENDIX- F: PLOT 1-3: OBSERVED Vs CORRECTED SPT (BH-1 to BH-5)................................................. 50-52

APPENDIX –G:GRAPH-1-3 DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH………….…………...................................................... 53-55

APPENDIX –I: TABLE-1 COMPUTATION BASED ON SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA.......................................... 59-59

TABLE-2 COMPUTATION BASED ON SETTLEMENT CRITERIA............................................... 60-60

TABLE-3 COMPUTATION OF PILE LOAD CAPACITY............................................................... 61-64

TABLE-4 COMPUTATION OF LATERAL LOAD CAPACITY ...................................................... 65-65

APPENDIX-J SITE PHOTOGRAPHS................................................................................................... 66-66

APPENDIX-K LABORATORY PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................................... 68-69

September 18th, 2021

We feel pleasure to submit the test report of pre tender Geotechnical

test, preparing the sketches and typing the report.

forTechpro Engineers Pvt. Ltd

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

This report deals with pre tender Geo-technical investigation at the

For the proposed structures, it is required to determine the safe

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

2.4. Collection of undisturbed soil samples at every 2.50minterval or at change of stratum

2.5. To conduct Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at an interval of 1.50 m or noticeable

3. GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION:

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

Date of SPT Hammer

BH-1 27.201393 77.995168 28-8-21 31-8-21 Standard Wire rope 30.00

BH-3 27.190506 78.001986 25-8-21 27-8-21 Standard Wire rope 30.00

BH-4 27.187851 78.007118 04-9-21 05-9-21 Standard Wire rope 30.00

BH-5 27.178253 78.017158 06-9-21 08-9-21 Standard Wire rope 30.00

Structure of SPT Sampler

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

CORRELATION FOR CLAY/PLASTIC SILT CORRELATION FOR SAND/NON-PLASTIC SILT

Soft 3 to 4 Blows Loose 5 to 10 Blows

Medium Stiff 5 to 8 Blows Medium 11 to 30 Blows

Stiff 9 to 16 Blows Dense 31 to 50 Blows

Very Stiff 17 to 32 Blows Very Dense Above 50

Modified value ‘N’= 15+ (N-15)/2.

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

The following laboratory tests were conducted to determine the

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

6. DETAILS OF SOIL STRATA:

7. CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS:

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

7.1. Open Foundation:

7.1.1. Shear Failure Criteria:

= Mixed (Interpolation in between General

Factor of safety (F.S.) = 2.50

qna = (1 / F.S.) [0.667c NcSc dc + q (Nq - 1) Sqdq + 0.5 B  N SdW’]

Calculations based on Shear failure criteria have been provided in Table-1 of

7.1.2. SETTLEMENT CRITERIA:

Settlement for applied pressure (Sf) = (qs x Su x df x Rd)/ (W ’x100)

(NABL ACCREDITATION No. TC-9169) Revision-R0

Su = Settlement for unit pressure of 1.00 kg/cm2