Is there a paternalist case to be made for the prohibition of prostitution?

Does it come down to something as

simple as "human dignity"? Or does prohibiting prostitution in a way constitute an attack on human dignity?
-- if human dignity requires that we respect people's free and informed choices... etc.

https://www.ciokorea.com/news/14308/

https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002662080

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart%E2%80%93Devlin_debate .,

http://inews.ewha.ac.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4516

https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.naver?isHttpsRedirect=true&blogId=wndtla9&logNo=28834164

http://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/Item/E0079691

태초부터 성매매가 합법이었다면?

종교적 이유가 클 것이다.

양지화를 하자.

길거리에 쓰레기 – 남성과 여성의 성 역할 차이 여성이 vulnerable

Sex industry 가 무조건 expand 하지는 않을 것임

가수의 성대

성적으로 attractive

취향이 너무나 다양하다

1. 허용 제도의 현실성

2. 남성과 여성의 성

뜬구름 잡기

무적 논리?

Pimp system

Rejected sex

발표순서

1. FBI warning 우리는 모두 포함. 급진적. What if prostitution was not illegal from the first place? 남자 여자

2. 부정적인 인식의 계기

3. 이미 일어나고 있는 문제들

4. 확실한 온정주의

5. 예시들(장기 매매,헌혈 시스템) 불법화, 합법화 성적 취향이 너무 다양하니 합법화 하여 1:1 매칭 시스템(더
 안전한) 궁극적인

6. Abolishment Pimp system 등등 성매매 합법화에 성공한 나라들의 정책들

7. 기대효과 rejected sex

Warning Page + 질문/배경 + 부정적인 사회 이미지 + Problems with illegal prostitution environment + View on
Paternalism + Countries that have a good sex industry + 매춘 합법화의 좋은 효과

1. 자발적인 성매매자에 대한 착취 금지 및 통제 2. 강제적 성매매 금지 및 처벌 3. 성적 학대로부터 미성년자의

보호 4. 성판매 여성의 지위 보호 5. 성매매와 범죄와의 연계 차단 6. 불법 체류 외국인들에 의한 성매매
유입의 감소’

https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001947548

네덜란드 성매매 합법화의 핵심은 합법적 성매매와 불법적 성매매를 명확히 구분하고 전자는 허용 , 하지만 후자는
법에 의해 더욱 강경하게 처벌하는데 있다 즉 새로 도입된 , . , 성매매의 합법화는 성인 간의 자발적 성매매는 불법이
아니지만, 불법 성매 매는 더욱 강력하게 처벌한다는 두 가지의 축으로 구성되어 있다 이러한 불 . 법 성매매는 강제
성매매 미성년자 성매매 및 불법 이주자의 성매매 등을 말 , 한다 즉 합법화의 주요 목적의 하나는 불법 이주
성매매자가 (WODC 2002). 네덜란드에서 성매매를 하지 못하게 하는 것이었다

네덜란드에서는 년 성매매를 합법화하는 조치에 의해 2000 합법적 성매매 자와 불법적 성매매자가 구분되고 지방
도시의 허가를 요하는 , / 성매매 허가 영역과 허가를 요하지 않는 성매매 비허가 영역이 명확히 구분됨으로써 성,
매매가 국가에 의해 더욱 강력하게 규제되고 있다 2). 성매매 허가 영역은 성 네덜란드 성매매 합법화의 효과 : 불법
이주 성매매자의 배제를 중심으로 ❙ 9 매매업을 하기 위해 그 지방의 허가를 얻어야 한다 성매매 시설을 갖추고 성 .
매매업을 하는 클럽 성매매업소 및 윈도우 성매매 등이 이에 속한다 반면에 , . 성매매 비허가 영역은 영업허가
대상이 되지 않는 유형으로 각 지방에 따라 약간의 차이는 있으나 주로 에스코트 서비스와 길거리 성매매 등이 이에
해 당된다 3). 합법적인 성매매는 합법적 성매매자에 의해 성매매 허가 영역에서 성매 매가 이루어지는 유형으로 표
의 영역에 국한된다 나머지 < 1> Ⅰ . ⅡⅢⅣ , , 영역의 성매매는 불법적 성매매자에 의해 이루어지거나 허가를
요하지 않는 , 비허가 영역에서의 성매매로서 비합법적 영역의 성매매에 해당된다 네덜란드에서 전체 성매매자의
수가 공식적으로는 파악되지 않고 있으며 합법적 성 , 매매자와 불법적 성매매자 간의 추정 비율도 없지만 성매매
허가 영역 업종 , 중 클럽 성매매업소 및 윈도우 성매매의 비율은 전체 허가 영역 업종 중 약 , 66.1% ( 를 차지하고
있다 또한 이러한 허가 영역에서 일하는 Daalder 2007). 성매매자는 네덜란드 이외의 출신인 이주 성매매자가 를
넘게 차지하고 60% 있다 4). 그런데 성매매 허가 영역에서 이주 성매매자로서 일해 왔던 대부분의 성매매자는
성매매의 합법화에 의해 사회적 통합이 아니라 사회적 배제의 대 상이 되었다 사회적 배제의 법적 효과는 공식적으로
허용된 성매매 시장에서 . 의 배제이며 불법 이주자 신분으로 규정되어 추방되는 것이다 , . 불법 이주자 는 유효한
비자 없이 혹은 위조한 비자로 이주국에 들어 온 자 혹은 합법적 , 인 비자로 들어 온 후 비자 기간이 소멸 된 자이다
(Kontos and Ute 2006)

http://klri.re.kr:9090/bitstream/2017.oak/4414/1/40599.pdf
렌탈 시스템

스크립트 하기

https://www.kukinews.com/newsView/kuk202107160220

https://rinj.org/prostitution/?
gclid=Cj0KCQiA1NebBhDDARIsAANiDD3hhXgWiaCsZYirT6M4R8Cv2ivULGo0aqNFh_gBK881wwkuEyjA86UaAhGdEAL
w_wcB

https://harvardcrcl.org/to-protect-women-legalize-prostitution/

In the Netherlands, prostitution was legalized on October 1, 2000, to recognize sex as work. But there are a few
problems such as illegal immigrants’ shady prostitution, underage prostitution, and lack of vocational education.
Service providers do not have enough information and accurate awareness of what they are doing. This can lead
to mental problem.

Germany legalized prostitution in 1927. However, prostitution was regarded as an invalid and unacceptable
contract leaving sex workers exposed to exploitation and repression. For instance, prostitution workers were
required to undergo regular medical checkups. Also, since Germany empowered local governments to prohibit sex
trade in certain regions or at certain times, prostitute could not have the same status as other occupations. But
after a revision of law in 2001, Germany eliminated the practice of interpreting sex work as unethical as they
started to recognize it as legal protected profession. Now sex works can for a labor union and there are no more
mandatory health checkups. Individuals can employ prostitutes, but it is only possible to the extent that it does
not harm the individual and economic independence of workers.

We can expect a few effects through legalizing prostitution. First, by building safe and robust system like blood
management services the state can protect sex workers, ultimately, society. Second, there will be more freedom of
occupation choice. Third, the state can provide a secure environment for both service providers and clients. And
we are expecting the reduction of two kinds of crimes. First one is mafia, gang, pimp-related crime. Since these
three are often deeply related to prostitution activities, legalizing prostitution is expected to reduce related crimes.
Also, since fulfilling the needs of sexually rejected people get easier, sex crime will decrease too. Sex education
will be operated in more active and open atmosphere, and there will be the rise of social status of sex workers.

In the Netherlands, prostitution was legalized on October 1, 2000, to recognize sex as work.
But there are a few problems such as illegal immigrants’ shady prostitution, underage
prostitution, and lack of vocational education. Service providers do not have enough
information and accurate awareness of what they are doing. This can lead to mental problems.

Germany legalized prostitution in 1927. However, prostitution was regarded as an invalid and
unacceptable contract leaving sex workers exposed to exploitation and repression. For
instance, prostitution workers were required to undergo regular medical checkups in a coercive
and untidy system.

Also, since Germany empowered local governments to prohibit sex trade in certain regions or
at certain times, a prostitute could not have the same status as other occupations. But after a
revision of the law in 2001, Germany eliminated the practice of interpreting sex work as
unethical as they started to recognize it as a legally protected profession. Now sex workers can
form a labor union and Individuals can employ prostitutes, but it is only possible to the extent
that it does not harm the individual and economic independence of workers.

Now, let us summarize. We can expect a few effects through legalizing prostitution. First, by
building safe and robust systems like blood management services, the state can protect sex
workers, ultimately, society. Second, there will be more freedom of occupation choice. Third,
the state can provide a secure environment for both service providers and clients. And we are
expecting the reduction of two kinds of crimes. The first one is mafia, gang, and pimp-related
crime. Since these three are often deeply and directly related to prostitution activities,
legalized, and organized prostitution systems can reduce related crimes. Also, since it will be
easier for sexually rejected people to fulfill their sexual needs, sex crime will decrease too. Sex
education will be operated more actively in an open atmosphere, and there will be a rise in
the social status of sex workers. Finally, it can be discussed at various levels such as public
opinion and parliament.

These are our references. Problems have ALWAYS arisen COVERTLY even in illegal conditions.
Why not LEGALIZE and REGULATE to PROVIDE SAFER ENVIRONMENT for both buyers and
sellers? Thank you for listening.
Type this assignment directly into the text box provided in the assignment (DO NOT upload PDFs
or Doc files).

In this assignment, you will "critique"** another group's presentation (not your own group's
presentation!).

Recommended format: 20% summary; 60% analysis of the group's presentation (strong points,
weak points, points on which you agree or disagree with the group's reasoning/logic, etc.); 20%
conclusion and suggestions of how it could have been better.

Again, you are free to leave it until really late, but I suggest that you start it early and get it done
early, because a second assignment will be assigned around the beginning to middle of November.

Any *one* of the first 7 presentations for this class can be chosen (as long as it is not your group!).

Word count: 1000 words.

Grading:
1) Summary of presentation is accurate and succinct, capturing the main points of the presentation
25%
2) Critique draws on class material or other material to identify weak and/or strong points 30%
3) Critique demonstrates that the writer understood the group's presentation 10%
4) Grammar, spelling, formatting, etc. 20%
5) Has a good title, introduction, and conclusion to make the critique paper interesting to read 15%

**Note that critique is different from criticism. If you're unsure what a critique is, Google is your
friend
독일 – 규제주의

1927 년 성매매 합법화 – 사회적 피해를 규제

1954 년 성매매 종사자 정기적인 의료검진 의무화 경찰의 검문 검색 가능 – 의료검진증 항상 소지 필요 아닐 시 체포

성매매로 인한 소득 과세대상 판시

하지만 성매매는 민법에 의해 사회적으로 용납될 수 없는 무효한 계약으로 간주 – 착취 및 억압에 노출되도록 방치

지방자치단체에게 특정한 지역이나 특정한 시간에 성매매를 금지할 수 있는 권한 부여 – 타 직업과 같은 지위 가지지

못함

Since 2001

성매매를 도덕적이지 못한 것(sittenwidrig)으로 법적 해석해오던 관행을 없앰 – 법적으로 보호받는 직업 중 하나로

인정

노동조합 결성 가능 – 노동권 주장 가능

건강 검진 의무화 폐지 – 자유로운 건강 검진, 의료보험의 혜택

개인은 성매매 여성 고용 가능하지만 숙박, 거주 및 부수적 서비스 제공하는 수준이어야 함 – 세금납부의 의무

성매매로 얻은 소득은 다른 직업군보다 더 높은 세율 - 하지만 성매매 산업은 대부분 현금으로 이루어짐

개인의 성매매 여성 고용 – 종사자의 개인적이고 경제적인 자립도를 해치지 않는 범위 내에서만 가능

성매매 알선 불법 – 개인들이 모여 성매매 종사하는 상업적 성매매 불법, 포주 행위 불법

중한 인신매매 – 폭력이나 협박, 위계를 사용하여 사람 유괴 후 성매매 종사 종용

지방자치단체

1. 성매매 금지구역 선포 가능

2. 인구수 2 만 이하일 경우 도시전체 성매매 금지 가능 ex) 뮌헨 – 시내권 내 성매매 금지, 베를린 – 시내권 내
대부분 성매매 허용

네덜란드 – 자유주의적 여성주의 영향을 받은 규제주의

자발적인 성매매를 사회적으로 인정 – 성매매 종사자들의 사회적 지위 안정

허가제 – 통제에 실효성 ex) 강요된 성매매, 미성년자의 성매매, 불법체류 외국인들의 성매매 강력 단속

법적인 보호와 세금 납부

성매매 = 다른 직업과 마찬가지의 사회적 지위

성매매 종사자 Working Conditions Act, Working Hours Act, Labour Act for Aliens

노동시간, 최소임금, 노동 3 권, 사회보장의 혜택

UWV(Social Security Agency)-성매매업에 종사를 희망하는 사람에게 성매매업 소개 가능

하지만 적합한 거주권이 있는 자에게만 성매매 허용

                                         

 No p→q in politics 

                                                    
2022105421 정지윤

I will make critique the presentation on dictatorship. They supported dictatorship mainly
based on economic growth. During Park Chung-hee's dictatorship, he raised the level of
Korea's economy, which had lagged far since the Korean War, through the Saemaul
Movement and export-led industrialization called the miracle of the Han river. They also
argued that German pharmaceutical technology had developed remarkably compared to
other countries due to the human experiment of Adolf Hitler's regime.

In response to their announcement, I would say 'too simply defined a causal relationship.'
Of course, I agree that Korea has grown significantly through Park Chung-hee's wise policy.
It is also somewhat agreeable that human experiments have contributed to the growth of
pharmaceutical technologies. However, it is not enough to say that 'dictatorship' is good.
Even if these were done in a democracy, they could have had equally good results.

Many conservatives argue that dictatorship is inevitable. For example, Walter Galenson, an
economics professor at Cornell University, said that the more democratic the government is,
the more likely it is that resources will shift from investment to consumption. Samuel
Huntington said that political participation should be temporarily curbed for economic
development. But according to Adam Przeworsky's research, there is no difference in
investment rates between dictatorship and democracy, and there is no difference in
economic growth. The theory of the inevitability of dictatorship seems too one-dimensional
consequentialism.

It did not fit my thinking, but the presentation was good. The best part was that the position
was clear, and they stuck to it despite many questions. I was especially impressed by the
woman who dyed her hair. Her voice was moderately loud and confident, and she had the
power to hold the audience.

To make a few suggestions, first, I wish there were grounds for a clear correlation between
'dictatorship' and 'state prosperity.' 
For example, it is difficult to think that dictatorship and economic growth have a direct
causal relationship with the original data alone. I believe other factors like 'the catching-up
effect' would have been more influential. Second, I want a more detailed graph, not a graph
of total GDP growth. Since GDP consists of consumption, investment, government
purchases, and net exports, it would have been easier to see how it grew using a more
detailed indicator

They chose a very controversial topic but made a good presentation. Also, they gave me a
chance to rethink dictatorship.