You are on page 1of 4

Boi Sec436 45o ca PC, 1973

Che Comcept o Boul h as to be Seem 1m


Light he Comcept o 07Tese

Boi
Bulable
S-432 Agnicipatory
Bail
S-438

Hem-Bculabl e
S 437 De aulu
Beul S-l67(2)
Metivamn VS Sta mP_1978 J. Rrishma Ayyer Sou cf that
b is vule S imprSomm em1 Cx ceptlom

Bailable oences (S: 43) Beulable


Bail 0 a maller aTIgh
Less Seriou ohemce
Corn be a m ted by Police p rovide d
Com
SuT is funíshed

uuchoyam Simgh vs- Stede Cdelhi tolun 978


Tm thius
Tm this Case the
Case the Suspemeled Seni
0pellamis Were the Semia
aCCused of the murdevimg
lice k c s who ave
were Yeleosed on bail by
moteriGAM dacot'Sumder 1heu
howtvey comtelled d theiy
Secsiong jud, but high CouT
the
ba hem tho m a tte come hegore Sc
SC Obser Vokion 410mtim4 Do

Natu1 ndgroity athe Cirumstamtes f


which the oene is commi Hed
posiBion 8 Stotus a4 the accused uth T eheree
1)he
victim u tmesses
tt)he ikelshood althe aceused leelnlreimg fhom
juSHce f Ye peekimg the o4femce
1Possibility a termpeing wuth the w1ness evtdeoce

Stode vS Coptu m jagjit Singh 1962


Fact Respondemts maimly DroSecude d mded Sec 385
oic od Secveats Acs 192

1SSue-Sec 3 om beulloke ohenc


Sec- S beulahle hemce
SC held thod both abailoble & non- boulable efferee
e Com mi tted by the accused, then the cae uwi
1al und e mom boulewhle a{emce
Me Moti Ram VS St
of mp 197

Oct dinary aboua wa acked to pCh CSum


Am aSum
a 710,600 wndea son able cmount fon bul alomg ils
a
he magistaale <fus ed o accep t Suret ship hfF
i e m e a ' s baother becouse he and his asseR/s
he pe
stoicl
.

weve i n a M e 'he?

SC hel thot do odd imsut to- mju? the


SuTities 4aom his w
maisfaote ha demaneled
Ka maddo, Ta mil & Telgu
1amil Trlau
distic whet ic a mal7ale
a7estecd jn Baste, port Blo poholg0an
6 do if
Can mot ho ve Surelies Ownimy preperlies
Chondni chouk He
places COUrt ad ded Surieies must
in these stam
ot e0Sonable omound md rom any plate wwthi
be
Court n d tre maist9 cte to
rélease pelil/oner
Tmdio ? luco
n his aun bond 1m a Sum a

t h Surely
Bomd vndertokim wthout Sugefy -ecomizayc
no amou ic mentidn ed
434 Bend
4-34 them why amoumt necisS ar y
S-4407 amound Shoult mof be ekCessivC

USswmu rd khotn VSSt4 oBiho

0movnd Do md

notuae rovidy o
the afj ence
(
he ecom&mic St al es md po ci on af accusd

he possibliy of ilteing from juslice.


(
Spealtn nder- every bou onder
hedher
Sp ealronz ander
Sp
eali dg nder
JudgememtS On Sp

be ( n i noted to th par ties


mus

nd h www a le
is
oson based

C'umi/le
Ch ou m

Testablishe d
hypo the clk
cluded

Yeas0T ab nourA
leov 0
whi(h S CoMiS/A uth

CuS d

Comcl sib
eac en Sp calu m
Gn e s ien Achaital Conufh a

cApin

You might also like