SELF-ASSESSMENT

SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence or a Certificate of Good
Practice.

Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.

Fill in first names of students

MET Rishikul Vidyalaya
Name of the school

Kaashvi
Group leader

Aarya
Student 1

Amruta
Student 2

Aditi
Student 3

Arnav
Student 4
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N in points in points

Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly Y 3

layout presented

- Research is divided into different

parts

- All documents are visible on the

Weebly

- Multiple features of Weebly have

been used

Group 5p - The group has a short and Y 5

introduction attractive written/video introduction

- A group photo/camera shot is

added

- Personal information is shared

(hobbies, etc.)

- In case the group used a YouTube

video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title

Research 10p - Sufficient people were interviewed Y 7

methods
- A good summary of the answers
of each interview is included

General 10p - How good is the quality of the Y 8

questions research?

- Are all general questions covered?

Sub questions 25p - How good is the quality of the Y 20

research?

- Are all sub questions covered?

Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Comparison of 5p - How good is the quality of the Y 5

research comparison?
outcomes
- Are all points of comparison
covered?

Conclusion 5p - How good is the quality of the Y 4

conclusion?

- Are all points of the conclusion

covered?

Documentation 5p - Has the research been Y 2

documented in pictures/videos?

- Are there sufficient pictures added

and do the videos meet the
requirements in terms of length,
etc.?

Evidence of 5p - Evidence of communication is Y 5

communication added

Comparison 10p - The quality of the comparison is Y 8

with partner good
group’s
research - The comparison focuses on
similarities and differences between
the conclusions of the group +
partner group

- A conclusion on learning
outcomes is included
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the Y 13

reflection?

- Has each student written an

individual reflection?
Total 100p 80

Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?

Please explain your ideas concisely.

Though our team enjoyed the entire process of interviewing and

Communicating with the other team and report writing, the one
thing we wish would have been done more was the meeting with
the other group.