There are also other special jurisdictions which are used by courts to solve disputes between

citizens’ rights violations for example a dispute over EU budget legislation and other cases that
are concerned with Irish Border whole and partly protocol on UK army. Furthermore, the courts
may solve a dispute by providing a detailed interpretation of the agreement entered between the
tor states before the court suggests for an arbitration when the dispute cannot be solving by way
of negotiation. Usually, there are no agreements with rules that can be used as parallel cases
under EU law and domestic UK law that can be used by the courts in the system of dispute
resolution. The courts may require the disagreeing parties to use a general obligation of sticking
to the processes of withdrawing the agreement as a way of settling the dispute under Article 168
as applies to the Brexit issue. Article 168 provides that any dispute arising between parties under
UK law and international law from the agreements, the disagreement shall be solved by recourse
process as the agreement provides.
When it is established that the disagreement is not solved within three months after consultation,
the court may agree an arbitration process from any party involved in the disagreement through a
panel set up. The two disagreeing parties are either asked by the courts to jointly agree to begin
the process of arbitration even before that point. The court requires five arbitrators from a list of
25 people who will be jointly drawn. The list must be made within 15 days of arbitration
request. When the list of arbitrators is not jointly agreed upon the dispute system will not be
paralysed and instead, the court requires the parties to produce a list in promptly because the
panel must give their verdict within 12-month time. If the panel agrees to make the ruling
urgently, the court gives an express deadline reduction to six months.