Research

Statement of the Hypothesis/

Working Title Research Gap Aim/Goal/ Output/ Outcome Method
Problem Assumption
Objectives
Unveiling the Literature/Observation 1. To describe the SOP 1 An IEC material Hypothesis: This study will use
Apathy Level of respondents as to How may the profile based on the HO: (Null the quantitative
BPSU-DC Students - It has been found that the following of the respondents result of the hypothesis) research design
as Basis in Crafting the majority of profile: be described in study. using descriptive
IEC Materials research uses the 1.1 Sex terms of: There is no research design.
Apathy Evaluation 1.2 Program and 1.1 Sex significant
Scale are on diseases Year 1.2 Program and difference in the
and other related Year BPSU-DC student’s
medical conditions. 2. To determine the apathy level
apathy level of the SOP 2 considering their
- It was found that respondents in How may the apathy profile.
there are some terms of: level of the
research studies on respondents be
student apathy but 2.1 Cognitive described in terms
focuses on 2.2 Behavior of:
absenteeism. 2.3 Emotional
2.4 Others 2.1 Cognitive
- It was found that 2.2 Behavior
there is no research 3. To determine the 2.3 Emotional
about apathy in significant 2.4 Others
education. difference in the
apathy level of SOP 3
Research Gap BPSU-DC students Is there a significant
considering their difference in the
- There was no profile. apathy level of BPSU-
research conducted at DC student
BPSU-DC on the apathy 4. To present a considering their
level of BPSU students proposed IEC profile?
using the Apathy material based on
Evaluation Scale. the result of the SOP 4
study. What IEC materials
to be use based on
 the result of the
study?
Methodology
1. The quantitative
data will be
gathered using the
Apathy Scale.

2. The researchers
will use the Google
Forms platform.

3. The data that will

be collected from
the research
subjects and then
will be subjected to
statistical analysis
using descriptive
statistics.

4. The Apathy Scale

consists of 18-item
questions.

5. To describe the
profile of the
respondents,
frequency count
and percentage will
be used.

6. On describing the
apathy level of the
respondents, mean
and standard
deviation with
interpretation will
be utilized.

7. Ethical
considerations and
data privacy will be
observed in the
conduct of this
research where the
respondents will be
asked if they are
willing to participate
and that all the data
collected from them
will be treated with
utmost
confidentiality and
will be used just for
the purpose of the
study.
 Research Statement of the Hypothesis/
Working Title Research Gap Output/Outcome Method
Aim/Goal/Objectives Problem Assumption
Unveiling the Literature/Observation 1. To describe the SOP 1 An intervention Hypothesis: This study will
Academic respondents as to How may the profile program based on HO: (Null use the
Procrastination - There are some the following profile:of the respondents the results of the hypothesis) quantitative
Level of the BPSU- research studies on 1.1 Sex be described in study. research design
DC Students in student academic 1.2 Program and Year terms of: There is no using
Relation to procrastination, but 1.1 Sex significant correlational
Personality Traits as they only focus on 2. To determine the 1.2 Program and difference in the research design.
Basis of Intervention psychology and nursing academic Year BPSU-DC
Program students. procrastination level student’s
of the respondents SOP 2 academic
- There is a research using Academic How may the procrastination
study on student Procrastination Scale academic level considering
academic (APS). procrastination level their profile.
procrastination in of the respondents
education, but only 3. To determine the be described using Hypothesis:
focus on pre-service personality trait of Academic HO: (Null
teacher. the respondents in Procrastination hypothesis)
terms of: Scale?
Research Gap There is no
- There was no 3.1 Openness SOP 3 significant
research conducted at 3.2 How may the relationship
BPSU-DC on the Conscientiousness personality trait of between the
academic 3.3 Extraversion the respondents be BPSU-DC
procrastination level of 3.4 Agreeableness described in terms student’s
BPSU students using 3.5 Neuroticism of: academic
the Academic procrastination
Procrastination Scale 4. To determine the 3.1 Openness level and
(APS). significant difference 3.2 personality traits.
in the academic Conscientiousness
- There was no procrastination level 3.3 Extraversion
research conducted at of BPSU-DC students 3.4 Agreeableness
BPSU-DC on the considering their 3.5 Neuroticism
personality trait of profile.
 BPSU students using 5. To determine the SOP 4
the Big Five Inventory significant Is there a significant
(BFI). relationship of the difference in the
academic academic
procrastination scale procrastination level
and personality traits of BPSU-DC student
of the respondents. considering their
profile?
6. To propose an
intervention program SOP 5
based on the results Is there a significant
of the study. relationship of the
academic
procrastination scale
and personality
traits of the
respondents?

SOP 6
What intervention
program may be
proposed based on
the results of the
study?
Methodology
1. The quantitative
data will be
gathered using the
Academic
Procrastination
Scale (APS) for
Academic
Procrastination and
the Big Five
Inventory (BFI) for
Personality Traits.

2. The researchers
will use the Google
Forms platform.

3. The data that will

be collected from
the research
subjects and then
will be subjected to
statistical analysis
using correlational
statistics.

4. The Academic
Procrastination
Scale (APS) has 25
items, whereas the
Big Five Inventory
(BFI) has 44 items.

5. To describe the
profile of the
respondents,
frequency count and
percentage will be
used.

6. On describing the
academic
procrastination level
and personality
traits of the
respondents, mean
and standard
deviation with
interpretation will
be utilized.

7. Ethical
considerations and
data privacy will be
observed in the
conduct of this
research where the
respondents will be
asked if they are
willing to participate
and that all the data
collected from them
will be treated with
utmost
confidentiality and
will be used just for
the purpose of the
study.