This document summarizes 14 observations regarding bridge design plans and provides compliance responses. Key points include: (1) the L-section design is still under approval; (2) the freeboard and clearance shown are less than required but cannot be changed due to doubling and existing approval; and (3) various design details like guard rails, weep holes, dimensions, and notes were corrected in the plans based on the observations. The compliance responses indicate the status of addressing each observation.
This document summarizes 14 observations regarding bridge design plans and provides compliance responses. Key points include: (1) the L-section design is still under approval; (2) the freeboard and clearance shown are less than required but cannot be changed due to doubling and existing approval; and (3) various design details like guard rails, weep holes, dimensions, and notes were corrected in the plans based on the observations. The compliance responses indicate the status of addressing each observation.
This document summarizes 14 observations regarding bridge design plans and provides compliance responses. Key points include: (1) the L-section design is still under approval; (2) the freeboard and clearance shown are less than required but cannot be changed due to doubling and existing approval; and (3) various design details like guard rails, weep holes, dimensions, and notes were corrected in the plans based on the observations. The compliance responses indicate the status of addressing each observation.
1. In attachment Approved -L-section, completion plan & copy of 1. L section is an under approval. bridge register are not attached 2. Correct the file name - In attachment attached Hydraulic 2. Ok. report & check list. 3. In attachment attached list of CBE approval is not opened. 3. Ok. 4. In put up GAD shown free board & clearance is less then 4. It is not possible to change due to requirement of SOD. doubling.and aloso is an under approval cbe ccg. 5. In sectional elevation guard rail not shown. 5. Shown. 6. In sectional elevation weep hole not indicate. 6. Shown. 7. In section of return wall shown height of return wall is 7. Corrected. mismatch with shown in half elevation – half section. 8. In site plan shown span of existing bridge is mismatch with 8. Corrected. shown in title block. 9. In site plan add note for proposed railway land boundary. 9. Shown. 10. In bore log detail shown founding level of box is 10. Corrected. mismatch with shown in half elevation – half section. 11. Correct note no. 3 – proposed bridge is on DN stream 11. Corrected. only. 12. Correct note no. 10 – size of proposed box – 1 x 3.0 x 2.5 12. Corrected. instead of 1 1 3.0 x 2.0. 13. In title block degree of curve not written. 13. OK. 14. Correction in attachment. 14. Corrected.