Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stotal = Se + Sc
{
Load Type (Rigid; Flexible)
El primer encuentro
Elastic Settlement or Immediate Settlement depends on
Es trascendental
Settlement Location (Center or Corner)
Theory of Elasticity
Elastic Settlement
{ Time Depended Elastic Settlement (Schmertman & Hartman Method (1978)
Bqo
(1 - μs) α
2
Se =
Es
1
Where α = [ ln ( √1 + m2 + m / √1 + m2 - m ) + m. ln ( √1 + m2 + 1 / √1 + m2 - 1 )
p
m = B/L
B = width of foundation
L = length of foundation
Bqo (1 - μs) α
Se =
Es
3.0
2.5
α
αav
αr
2.0
α, αav, αr
1.5
3.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
L/B
Janbu, Bjerrum, and Kjaernsli (1956) proposed an equation for evaluation of the
average elastic settlement of flexible foundations on saturated clay soils (Poisson’s
ratio, μs = 0.5). Referring to Figure 1 for notations, this equation can be written as
Se = A1 A2 qoB/Es
1.5
5
A2 0.9 A1 1.0
2
Square
Circle
0.5
0.8
0 5 10 15 20
Df/B 0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
H /B
Values of A1 and A2 for elastic settlement calculation (after Christian and Carrier, 1978)
Elastic Settlement Using the Strain Influence Factor: [Schmertman & Hartman Method (1978)]
The variation of the strain influence factor with depth
Se = C1 C2 ( q - q) ∑ (Iz / Es ) Δz
below the foundation is shown in Figure 1.
Note that, for square or circular foundations,
where
Is = strain influence factor Iz = 0.1 at z = 0
C1 = a correction factor for the depth of foundation embedment Iz = 0.5 at z = 0.5B
= 1 - 0.5 [q / (q - q)] Iz = 0 at z = 2B
C2 = a correction factor to account for creep in soil Similarly, for foundations with L/B ≥ 10
= 1 + 0.2 log (time in years /0.1)
q = stress at the level of the foundation Iz = 0.2 at z = 0
Iz = 0.5 at z = B
q = overburden pressure = γ Df
Iz = 0 at z = 4B
Example:
BxL
q
Df q = γ Df Iz Es
ΔZ1
ΔZ2
Is3 ΔZ3
s3
Average Is
ΔZ4
Average Es
Depth, z
Elastic Parameters of Various Soils
Young’s Modulus, Es
Es (kN/m2) = 766N
Es = 2q c
Es = 250c to 500c
Es = 750c to 1000c
C1 = 1 - 0.5 (q / q - q )
Hence
Sc = C1 . C2 (q -q)
2B
Time = 5 years
(Iz /E s ) z
Example:
0
= (0.9)(1.34)[160-(17.8x1.5)](1.55x10-4 ) B x L = 3 m x 3m
= 249.2x10-4 m 24.9 mm
q = 160 kN/m 2 = 17.8 kN/m3
1.5 m Es (kN/m 2 ) 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 Iz
0
4,000 12,000 20,000
1.5
2 2
Iz = 0.5
4 4
6 6
8
Averaged
Depth, z (m)
Actual
Consolidation Settlement
Normally
Consolidated Sand
Clay
B
Caly
Hc Hc/2
Overburden
Pressure
Po
2
2
1 1
Stress
Distribution
Sand
P P
eo
Cc
Po Po + P Log P
Po Po + P Log P
Po Log P
Cc H log(po +p)
Sultimate = H =
CS H 1 + eolog (PPoo + DP )
DH =
1 + eO P0
Po = sand . Hsand + (clay - water ) . H clay/2
2 Hsand 2
Hsand
1
p2
1
CS H PC C CH P + DP
DH = log ( )+ log ( o )
1 + eO Po 1 + eO PC
eo
Cs
Cs
p2
2 Hsand Hsand
2
1 1
H clay/2 p Dp2
p2
Dp2 Hclay H clay/2 Hclay
Dp Po + P2
Void Ratio The soil become 2
Void Ratio
Dp P
overconsolidated P 2
Dp2
soil
eo
Cs
Po Pc Log P Po Pc Log P
Cs H log Pc
Sultimate = H = ( )
CS H P + DP2 1 + eo Po
DH = log ( o )
1 + eO Po
By: Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E.
Determining The Preconsolidation Pressure (Pc)
Cassagrande Graphical Method
Void Ratio
5 6
3
1
4
2
Po Pc Log P
OCR = Pc/Po
OCR = 1 Normally Consolidated
OCR > 1 Over Consolidated
OCR > 4 Heavily Over Consolidated
U% = f (Tv) ....
Tv = f (cv) ......
cv . t
Tv = Qdesign = Column Load
(Hdr)2
Sand
u =Excess Pore Water Pressure
Caly
Overburden Hdr = Hc /2
Pressure
P Stress Distribution
Po P 2: 1 method
Uo
H c = Layer Thickness
Sand