Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAPAN CITY
1. Provide aid to the needs of SARDOs and disadvantaged learners who are struggling to attend school regularly due to financial difficulties
2. Improve the attendance of SARDOs and disadvantaged learners
TO BE HELD AT: Target Date/Timeframe:
BUDGET PROPOSAL
A. FUNDS SOURCE/S:
1. Division MOOE/School MOOO 70,880.00
2. SARO from C.O. (Program Support Fund)
3. Registration fee
3. Others
TOTAL APPROVED BUDGET
B. ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: (Based on latest market survey)
Unit Qty. Amount Total Amount
Notebook (80pages) pcs 176 25 4,400.00
Ballpen black ordinary pcs 20 12 240.00
Pencil #2 pcs 20 12 240.00
Intermediate pad (100 pages) pcs 20 20 400.00
Meal allowance (1 plain rice, 1 vegetable/meat meal) pax 56 600 33,600.00
Transportation allowance pax 40 800 32,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES 70,880.00
C. FUND ATTRIBUTION:
1. GAD Score: 20.01
2. Estimated Expenses Attributed to GAD (GAD Score/20x budget) 70,915.44
3. Funds Attributed for the benefits of Senior Citizens and Differently-abled Employees, Indigenous people, Single Parents
4. Personnel Services (PS) attributable to GAD {(Total Manhours X total # of participants)/average salary grade} 54.04
CARLOS V. LEDESMA
Checked and Reviewed: Approved:
Principal III
MA. NALEN CLARETTE M. BRAZA SUSANA M. BAUTISTA
Accountant III Schools Division Superintedent
the Philippines
nt of Education
OPA REGION
ON OF CALAPAN CITY
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISON OF CALAPAN CITY
SARDO/
Notebook (80pages) Disadvantag Competitive Bidding June 17, 2023 June 23, 2023 June 27, 2023 August 01, 2023 School Budget 4,400.00
ed Learner
SARDO/
Ballpen black ordinary Disadvantag Competitive Bidding June 17, 2023 June 23, 2023 June 27, 2023 August 01, 2023 School Budget 240.00
ed Learner
SARDO/
Pencil #2 Disadvantag Competitive Bidding June 17, 2023 June 23, 2023 June 27, 2023 August 01, 2023 School Budget 240.00
ed Learner
SARDO/
Intermediate pad (100 pages) Disadvantag Competitive Bidding June 17, 2023 June 23, 2023 June 27, 2023 August 01, 2023 School Budget 400.00
ed Learner
SARDO/
Meal allowance (1 plain rice, 1 vegetable/meat meal) Disadvantag Competitive Bidding July 18, 2023 July 27, 2023 August 04, 2023 August 30, 2023 School Budget 33,600.00
ed Learner
SARDO/
Transportation allowance Disadvantag Competitive Bidding School Budget 32,000.00
ed Learner
###
TA
am Supervisor
rge
n Superintendent
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISON OF CALAPAN CITY
SCHEDULE/MILESTONE OF ACTIVITIES
CODE General Description Unit Qty. Unit Cost Total Cost
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
AISA OPREDO
HERYL JANIN D. ROJAS
August 25, 2023 Distribution of learning materials and
RANDY B. MAULION
7:15-7:30 AM documentation of activity
RONNIE B. MAGPANTAY
Project SAVE Team
September-December 2023
3.75 15mondays*15mins/60mins
SG
13 mam josen
11 mam aisa
13 mam melanie
13 mam emelita
13 mam heryl
11 sir randy
11 sir ronnie
12.14 average 54.04 Personnel attributed to GAD
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAPAN CITY
Response (col. 2)
*Score for
Dimension and Question Partly an item/ Result or Comment
No Yes
(col.1)
(2a)
Yes
(2c)
element (col. 4)
(2b) (col. 3)
Project identification and planning
1.0 Participation of women and men in project identification
(max score: 2; for each question, 0.67) 2
1.1 Has the project consulted and involved
women on the problem or issue that the Prior to the crafting of this project, the school
intervention must solve and on the conducted a meeting with the school planning
team consisting of 12 female and 4 male
development of the solution? (possible representatives from school and outside
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) stakeholders to share the vision, mission and
ü 0.67 core values of DepEd and its target for the
coming years to address the issues concerning
our learners today which includes school
dropouts.
(see attached minutes of meeting on crafting SIP)
1.2 Have women’s inputs been considered in the Both coordinators of ACCESS and EQUITY are
design of the project? (possible scores: 0, women (2)
0.33, 0.67)
ü 0.67 Inputs were incorporated in the crafting of this
project as stated on the background of the
project.
1.3 Are both women and men seen as stakeholders, Both women and men were involved in project
partners, or agents of change in the project design.
design? (possible scores: 0, 0.34, 0.66) ü 0.66
Project design
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAPAN CITY
Response (col. 2)
*Score for
Dimension and Question Partly an item/ Result or Comment
No Yes
(col.1)
(2a)
Yes
(2c)
element (col. 4)
(2b) (col. 3)
4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs (max score: 2; for
2
each item, 1)
4.1 Do project objectives explicitly refer to women and
men as students, parents, teachers, or As indicated in the project profile, a total of 35
administrators? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) ü 1 male and 9 female learners will benefit in this
project
Do the strategies match the gender issues and gender By fairly distributing the allotment of
equality goals identified? That is, will the activities or beneficiaries per gender (80% male and 20%
interventions reduce gender gaps and inequalities? female), this can reduce gender gaps and
inequalities identified on gender analysis( more
ü 2
male learners are at risk of dropping out and are
working students).
6.2 Access to and control of resources (max score: 0.67; for each
question, 0.22) 0.66
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA REGION
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAPAN CITY
Response (col. 2)
*Score for
Dimension and Question Partly an item/ Result or Comment
No Yes
(col.1)
(2a)
Yes
(2c)
element (col. 4)
(2b) (col. 3)
6.2.1 Does the project ensure that
opportunities for training and
scholarships that may be provided are
Opportunities for assistance program is fairly
equally accessible to women and men,
distributed to both male and female learners who
girls and boys? To different categories of ü 0.22 are at risk of dropping out and those who belong
females and males (rural/urban, ethnic in disadvantaged sectors.
groups)? (possible scores: 0, 0.11, 0.22)
Response (col. 2)
*Score for
Dimension and Question Partly an item/ Result or Comment
No Yes
(col.1)
(2a)
Yes
(2c)
element (col. 4)
(2b) (col. 3)
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for
The proposed budget covered possible cost that
gender equality promotion or integration? ü 1 will be incurred by the project.
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to integrate
GAD or to promote gender equality and women’s The Gender and Development is integrated in the
empowerment? OR, does the project commit itself project. It is open to both male and female
to investing project staff time in building capacity ü 1 SARDO and disadvantaged learners. It promoted
for integrating GAD or promoting gender equality? gender equality as it is fairly distributed to both
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) sexes.
10.2 Does the project have an exit plan that will ensure
Part of the exit plan is to coordinate with the
the sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits?
coordinator of Resiliency and Well-being for
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
ü 0.67 additional activities and program that will
sustain school engagement of both male and
female SARDO and disadvantaged learners.
Checked by:
CHRISTIAN M. ALBERTO
Senior Education Program Specialist
Human Resource Development Section
Divison GAD Focal Person
`
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
MIMAROPA
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CALAPAN CITY
DETAILS TEMPLATES
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT
Activtiy 1.
Professionala Advacement nfor Career
Advancement for Career and Educational
Development (PACED)
2.
Orientation on Induction Program for
Beginning Teachers and Completion Ceremony
LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Sub Intermediate Outcome 20210ACtdual