Name HLTH2003 - Group Presentation - Assessment Criteria and Standards Marking Rubric - 2022

Description

Rubric Detail

Levels of Achievement

More than meets More than meets

Does not meet criteria - Meets expectations More than meets
Criteria expectations - expectations - High
Fail - Pass expectations - Credit
Distinction Distinction

Introduction 0 to 2.5 points
No introduction of group
members; presentation has
no clear purpose; the topic
is not described or
contextualised.
2.5 to 3.24 points 3.25 to 3.74 points 3.75 to 4.24 points 4.25 to 5 points
Group members are Group members are Group members are Group members are
introduced; No introduced; the introduced; the introduced with their
presentation presentation purpose presentation purpose study discipline
purpose has been is identi ed; the is well identi ed; the highlighted; the
identi ed; the presentation topic is presentation topic is presentation has a clear
presentation topic is described and/or clearly described purpose identi ed and
poorly described contextualised though and/or contextualised a presentation overview
and/or lacks clarity or depth. with accuracy. is presented; the
contextualised. presentation topic is
described and
contextualised with
clarity, accuracy and
depth.
 Levels of Achievement
Does not meet criteria -
Criteria
Fail
Section 1: 0 to 12.49 points
Explanation
Limited or incorrect
/ teaching of
de nition of the topic;
the topic
examples used to explain
the topic are incorrect or
inappropriate and may lack
originality / creativity.
Contextual application of
the topic is super cial,
limited or incorrect.
Section 2: 0 to 12.49 points
Application
Mostly incorrect
of the topic
identi cation and contextual
to injury,
application of the topic to
disability
injury, disability and disease
and disease
categories. Explanations are
poor and show a poor level
of understanding and
application of the topic.
More than meets More than meets
Meets expectations More than meets
expectations - expectations - High
- Pass expectations - Credit
Distinction Distinction
12.5 to 16.24 points 16.25 to 18.74 points 18.75 to 21.24 points 21.25 to 25 points
Presentation Presentation provides A clear presentation A clear and concise
provides a basic a clear and detailed that provides a presentation that
de nition of the de nition of the topic; comprehensive provides a
topic; examples / examples / activities de nition of the topic; comprehensive
activities used to used to explain the examples / activities de nition of the topic;
explain the topic are topic are correct with used to explain the examples / activities
correct, though basic some originality / topic are correct, show used to explain the
and lack originality / creativity. Contextual originality / creativity topic are correct, show
creativity. Contextual application of the and are engaging. originality / creativity
application of the topic is correct. Most Contextual application and are highly
topic is correct but content is clear, of of the topic is correct. engaging. Contextual
super cial or limited. adequate depth and All content is clear, of application of the topic
Some content lacks relevant. adequate depth and is correct. All content is
clarity, depth or relevance. clear, of excellent depth
relevance. and relevance.
12.5 to 16.24 points 16.25 to 18.74 points 18.75 to 21.24 points 21.25 to 25 points
Some correct Mostly correct Correct identi cation Correct identi cation
identi cation and identi cation and and good contextual and excellent
contextual contextual application application of the topic contextual application
application of the of the topic to at least to at each of injury, of the topic to each of
topic to injury, two of injury, disability disability and disease injury, disability and
disability and and disease categories. disease categories.
disease categories. categories. Explanations are clear Explanations are clear,
Explanations are Explanations are and show good depth concise and show
sometimes unclear mostly clear and show of understanding and excellent depth of
and show low levels a moderate depth of application of the understanding and
of understanding understanding and topic. application of the topic.
and application of application of the
the topic. topic.
 Levels of Achievement
Does not meet criteria -
Criteria
Fail
Section 3: 0 to 12.49 points
Scienti c
A research example is not
research
presented and/or lacks
example
relevance to the topic.
Description of the article is
super cial, limited or
confusing. No link/s
between article and topic
are presented. Main ndings
of the research are not
presented.
More than meets More than meets
Meets expectations More than meets
expectations - expectations - High
- Pass expectations - Credit
Distinction Distinction
12.5 to 16.24 points 16.25 to 18.74 points 18.75 to 21.24 points 21.25 to 25 points
A research example A research example is A research example is A research example is
is presented that is presented that is presented that is presented that is highly
relevant to the topic. relevant to the topic. highly relevant to the relevant to the topic. A
Description of the Detailed description topic. A comprehensive
article is basic and of the article is comprehensive description of the
lacks depth of presented with good description of the article is presented with
information and depth of information article is presented excellent depth of
understanding. and understanding. with very good depth information and
Some link/s between Link/s between the of information and understanding. Link/s
the article and topic article and topic are understanding. Link/s between the article and
are presented but clearly presented with between the article topic are clearly
may lack clarity or some depth of and topic are clearly presented with
depth of understanding presented with good excellent depth of
understanding. Main evident. Main ndings depth of understanding evident.
ndings of the of the research are understanding Main ndings of the
research are not clearly presented. evident. Main ndings research are clearly
presented clearly. of the research are presented with
clearly presented with appropriate application
application outcomes outcomes identi ed.
identi ed.
 Levels of Achievement
Does not meet criteria -
Criteria
Fail
Presentation 0 to 7.49 points
Quality -
Content presentation quality
Material
is Poor. Slide quantity,
content and
format and ow are poor.
narration
Other aids (demonstrations,
diagrams, graphs, videos,
etc.) are poor or not used.
Key information is missing,
major errors are present, or
substantial inclusion of
irrelevant material is made.
Presenter speech is often
unclear, indicates
monotonic reading, and/or
is poorly paced. One
speaker may dominate the
presentation, which may
exceed the lower or upper
time limit.
References 0 to 2 points
Reference citations are
absent*, do not follow the
conventions of APA style
correctly.
View Associated Items
More than meets More than meets
Meets expectations More than meets
expectations - expectations - High
- Pass expectations - Credit
Distinction Distinction
7.5 to 9.74 points 9.75 to 11.24 points 11.25 to 12.74 points 12.75 to 15 points
Content Content is mostly well Content is well Content is excellently
presentation quality presented. Slide presented. Slide presented. Slide
is low. Slide quantity, quantity, format and quantity, format and quantity, format and
format and ow are ow are of a good ow are of a high ow are excellent.
of a lower standard. standard. Other aids standard. Other aids Other aids
Other aids (demonstrations, (demonstrations, (demonstrations,
(demonstrations, diagrams, graphs, diagrams, graphs, diagrams, graphs,
diagrams, graphs, videos, etc.) are well videos, etc.) are well videos, etc.) are
videos, etc.) are not used. Presenter used and engaging. excellent and engaging.
well used. Presenter speech is clear, may Presenter speech is Presenter speech is
speech is sometimes indicate reading, show clear, elaborated and clear, well-elaborated
unclear, indicates some elaboration and well paced. All and paced. All speakers
reading, and/or is is generally well speakers mostly contribute equally and
not well paced. One paced. Some speakers contribute equally and presentation is within
speaker may do not contribute presentation is within the time limit.
dominate the equally and the time limit.
presentation, which presentation may
may exceed the exceed the lower or
lower or upper time upper time limit.
limit.
2.5 to 3.2 points 3.25 to 3.7 points 3.75 to 4.2 points 4.25 to 5 points
Numerous required Some required Most required All required reference
reference citations reference citations are reference citations are citations are present,
are absent and/or do absent and mostly present, demonstrate demonstrate good
not follow the follow the conventions some variety of variety of sources and
conventions of APA of APA style correctly. sources and all follow all follow the
style correctly. the conventions of conventions of APA
Citations lack APA style correctly. style correctly.
breadth of sources.