ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING

IDENTIFY PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS
Instruction: Using the matrix on the next page, please rate each improvement area on five criteria using a 5-point scale as described below.

Criteria Description Scale

Strategic The number of other areas that will benefit when the
Importance improvement area is addressed 5 – Very High
Urgency The urgency or need to improve the area as soon as possible 4 – High
Magnitude The number of learners that will benefit when the improvement 3 – Moderate
area is addressed 2 – Low
Feasibility The degree to which the improvement area is within the 1 – Very Low
school’s mandate and control

Afterwards, compute the average rating of each improvement area and interpret the results as follows:

Average Rating Interpretation

4.5 – 5.0 Very High Priority
3.5 – 4.49 High Priority
2.5 – 3.49 Moderate Priority
1.5 – 2.49 Low Priority
1.0 – 1.49 Very Low Priority
 ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

Project RACE

AVERAGE INTERPRETAT
Strategic ION
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance

Low level performance in 5 4 5 5 4.75 Very High

reading comprehension in Priority
English and Filipino

Struggling and nonreaders in 5 4 5 5 4.75 Very High

English and Filipino Priority

Project NUMERO

AVERAGE INTERPRETAT
Strategic ION
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance

Most of the learners are 5 5 5 4 4.75 Very High

identified as non-numerates Priority

Project HATAW
 ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

AVERAGE INTERPRETAT
Strategic ION
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance

Poor Nutritional Status of 73 5 5 4 5 4.75 Very High

out of 331 pupils. Priority

24 out of 331 pupils are 5 4 4 2 3.75 High Priority

overweight and obese.

AVERAGE INTERPRETAT
Strategic ION
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance

Unsafe supply of drinking water 5 4 5 5 4.75 Very High

Priority

Project SOCIETY
 ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

AVERAGE INTERPRETAT
Strategic ION
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance

Low level of participation in 5 5 5 5 5 Very High

parent-teacher conference. Priority

Low level of engagement in            

schools’ activities. 5 4 5 5 4.75 Very High
Priority

INTERPRETAT
Strategic ION
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance AVERAGE

Absence of a Wide Gate that is 5 5 5 5 5 Very High

passable to a large vehicles like Priority
Fire truck

Absence of Water Storage Tank 5 5 5 5 5 Very High

in every Building Priority
 ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

Condemnable Administration 5 5 5 5 5 Very High

Priority

Narrow School Entrance leading 5 5 5 5 5 Very High

to front gate Priority

Absence of Canal Resulting to 5 5 5 5 5 Very High

Flooding Priority

School Canteen 5 4 5 3 4.25 High Priority

 Broken window
 Busted plugs/ electrical
facilities
 Broken doorknobs
 Broken/dilapidated ceiling
 Slippery pathway

Comfort Room at the back of 5 4 4 4 4.25 High Priority

School Clinic
 Broken/Swing -in doors
 Broken toilet bowl
Guidance Office 5 4 4 4 4.25 High Priority
 Broken/dilapidated ceiling
Dripping ceiling

Storage Room 4 3 3 3 3.25 Moderate

 Detached or Peeled off GI Priority
sheet
 Condemnable building
 ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

INTERPRETATI
Strategic ON
Improvement Areas Urgency Magnitude Feasibility
Importance AVERAGE

PPP Building 4 3 4 2 3.25 Moderate

 Slippery pathway Priority
 Broken window of CR
Tall cabinets/
shelves
School Clinic 4 3 3 3 3.25 Moderate
 Broken window Priority
 Not functional CR