ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

IDENTIFYING PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS

Instruction: Using the matrix on the next page, please rate each improvement area on the five criteria using a 5-point scale as
described below.

Criteria Description Scale

Strategic Importance The number of other areas that will benefit when the improvement area is 5- Very High
addressed 4 – High
Urgency The urgency or need to improve the area as soon as possible 3 – Moderate
Magnitude The number of learners that will benefit when the improvement is addressed 2 – Low
Feasibility The degree to which the improvement area is within the school’s mandate and 1 – Very Low
control

Afterwards, compute the average rating of each improvement area and interpret the result as follows:

Average Rating Interpretation

4.5 – 5.0 Very High Priority
3.5 – 4.49 High Priority
2.5 – 3.49 Moderate Priority
1.5 – 2.49 Low Priority
1.0 – 1.49 Very Low Priority

Improvement Area Strategic Urgency Magnitud Feasibility Average Interpretation Status

Importance e
Low Promotion Rate 5 5 5 5 5 VHP On-going
Literacy and Numeracy Rate 5 5 5 5 5 VHP On-going
Absenteeism 5 5 5 5 5 VHP On-going
Ancillary Rooms 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Perimeter Fence 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Covered Pathwalk 4 5 4 4 4 HP To be accomplished
 ANNEX 4 Identifying Priority Improvement Areas

Concrete Pavement 4 4 5 5 4 HP To be accomplished

Trainings and Seminars 5 5 4 4 5 VHP To be accomplished
Hiring of Additional Watchman/Utility 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Science Laboratory Room 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Audio Visual Room 4 4 5 5 4 HP To be accomplished
Comfort Room per Classroom 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Laboratory Tables 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Students’ ID 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
Low Nutritional Status 5 5 5 5 5 VHP To be accomplished
DRR Awareness/Management 5 5 5 5 5 VHP On-going