Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRITICAL REVIEW
LECTURER
Arranged by:
2020 M / 1441 H
Table 1 Journal Article Profile
No Profile Information
1 Title Risk Management at the Indonesian Archives Institute
2 Authors Dyah Puspitasari Srirahayu
3 Publication date January 2020
4 Journal JournalsRisk Management at the Indonesian Archives
Institute
5 Volume -
6 Issue -
7 Pages 1-11
8 Publisher e-journal
9 DOI https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3585
10 Abstract An archival institution is one that functions as an
organization that does not have an invaluable archive rescue
organization. Like other organizations, archival institutions
also experience risks that will affect operational processes or
the important records they manage. The purpose of risk
management is to minimize the failure received by the
institution because of the existing risk. This research is to
understand how the conditions of risk management in
archival institutions, the risks they face and the impacts that
occur. This study also aims to map risks in archival
institutions ranging from mild to severe impacts, so that
archival institutions can reduce the impact of risks if such
risks occur. This research method uses a qualitative approach
to archival institutions in Indonesia, namely the provincial
archives and tertiary archives. The results of this study
indicate that risk management in archival institutions does
not exist in writing but has been carried out together
No Sub Discussion
1 General 1. Researchers should generally explain the
perspectives understanding of archives as an initial description of
the problem, then begin to enter into a theoretical
framework that is not too long but it is difficult to
find the core of the theoretical framework so that it
appears to have long material and is difficult to
understand.
2. In general, readers will find it difficult to find the
core of the article content and difficulty in seeing it
2 The accuracy of The theory in this study includes many previous studies but
the theory do not know which theory will be used, so that the reader
must be confused about the theory used about this research.
3 Methodology The researcher did not include the research method used.
use
4 Research result 1. An important point that has not been touched by
researchers isthe three Archiving Institutions can be
seen that comprehensive identification has not been
carried out by the three Institutions. However, from the
results it can be seen that they understand what risks
might occur and what their impact on archival
institutions, especially those they manage.
2. The results of research using secondary data will be
stronger if supported by primary data.
3. Researcher's statement is convincing but it seems
difficult to understand in general because researchers do
not explain the analysis of the results of the discussion
of data processing used, researchers only manage the
data without analyzing it in the discussion.
4. The lack of clear results even we readers feel confused
to read this research.
The results of the study should be clearly explained in
accordance with the main objectives of the researcher.
5 Results of the 1. Researchers do not apply the theory used in research to
researchers' make it easier to conduct research.
conclusions 2. The theoretical framework used is too long and not right
on target so it is difficult to understand, the use of
document analysis methods is also less satisfactory so
that it does not achieve maximum results.
3. archival institutions have carried out risk management
even without clear regulations. The head of the archival
institution, together with his archivist, has identified,
evaluated, mitigated, and reviewed their records
management. Archival institutions understand the
importance of archives that are managed as part of the
nation's history, as an invaluable asset that needs to be
protected and kept away from risk.