Equipment Modification Request (EMR)

Part I: To be Completed by Field –Well Services

Note: You MUST complete Part I and obtain ALL required approvals at
Originator Date the bottom of Part I before submitting to InTouch.
Hussein Emad 25-7-2023

Location Geomarket Instructions for Completion:

1. Refer to WS Standard 4, Guideline 3, EMRs/NSRs (InTouch
EG-ECE ESG
ID#3313678)
Alternate Contact Name(s) (in case Originator is not available) 2. The EMR must be completed and approved BEFORE the
equipment is modified, not after.
3. The field approvals required on Part I of the form must be
received before the Product Center and Headquarters will
begin their analysis and approval on Part II.

Unit Type or Model Number Production Number (i.e. CPS-361 09-001) Fixed Asset Number Year Built
CPF-573 CPF57304B0044 CPF57304B0044 2004
Description of Equipment Who will perform modifications? How many units will be modified?
Cement Pump Float CAT ENGINE 16 (CPF-573/CPS-361/CPT-472)
WS Employees
3rd-Party Contractors

Description of Modification
Installation of PV-380-R3 (Engine Parameters Display) to monitor Engine Parameters (Load, coolant Temp, RPM, Hours, Display fault messages for faster
troubleshooting between PSD team in the Field or remote locations & TLM in the Workshop etc... ) The one PV-380-R3 will be a replacement of current
console gauges (2 RPM Gauges, 2 Hour-Meters and a Voltmeter) by connecting it directly to ECM,
This will improve asset maintainability and reduce parts consumed.

Reason or justification for modification (include the impact of not making the modification)
1- Improve asset maintainability. (one gauge replace 3 gauges and provide more data), reduce number of harness for each gauge.
2- Acquiring engine hours directly from ECM, more accurate from existing Hour meters gauges and sensors (Improve T-0) and avoid performing Meter
Change on MAXIMO CMMS for the replacement of Hour meter gauges.
3- Lead time of the replacement failed parts 8-12 months. and we are suffering to get the parts delivered specially the hour-meter gauges.
ESM Tickets: CS0933755, CS0933761, CS0933750, etc.. The lead time of new Gauge 2-4 months
4- Unify the the PV-380-R3 to be utilized on all CMT Pumps and give the chance to easy replace any failed gauge in future as it will be common for all
Pumps.
5- More Data Can be monitored and alarms can be utilized (Buzzer) to warn pump operator in case of any fault in the Engine during operation.*
6- in CPS-361 (C-10) the Replacement of current Tachometers by PV-380-R3 will save 1000 $/per Pump and will provide the other data like voltmeter
which is very important to avoid sudden shut down during CMT Jobs in case of alternators failed and prevent possible NPT.

How will the modification be certified to be properly engineered and fit for purpose?
Intouch Solution Best Practice#7994079 is submitted.
EMR to be approved.
Equipment Modification Request (EMR)
Part I: To be Completed by Field –Well Services

Risk Analysis Worksheet -1 0 1

1. Does the modification enhance the overall equipment functionality / performance? (example: Improve No Impact Reduce
* Buzzer can be triggered during pumping if any fault from engine side give the decision
improve the pump rate, pressure range, engine load) to operator to switch smoothly to other pumping side avoiding pumping interuption
2. Does the modification improve the efficiency and/or operation of the equipment? (example: rig up Improve No Impact Reduce
* Buzzer can be triggered during pumping if any fault from engine side give the decision
time) to operator to switch smoothly to other pumping side and avoid pumping interuption

3. How does the modification affect HSE risk? (example: structure of equipment, lifting hazard, Reduce Risk No Impact Increase Risk
ergonomics)
4. Is the company that will do the modification qualified or an approved supplier and do they have Yes No
experience in this type of work?
Improve No Impact Reduce
5. Does the modification of the equipment increase the equipment's maintainability?

Yes No
6. Is this modification due to contractual requirements? (from the client)

Yes No
7. Is this modification due to local regulation requirements?

8. Does the modification affect the existing certification of equipment? (example: DNV, CE, ZONE No Effect Yes
II, Atex)

OPC Asset Coordinator Review (Required) OU PSD Manager Review (Required)

Reviewer’s Feedback (optional): Reviewer’s Feedback (optional):

Electronic Signature Electronic Signature

Recommend Approval (enter recommendation first) Recommend Approval (enter recommendation first)
Digitally signed by Omar Ramzy 663722 Digitally signed by Ahmed Hammam 686354

Omar Ramzy DN: DC=com, DC=slb, DC=DIR, OU=Accounts, DN: DC=com, DC=slb, DC=DIR, OU=Accounts,

Do Not Recommend Approval OU=Employee, CN=Omar Ramzy 663722,

E=ORamzy@slb.com Do Not Recommend Approval Ahmed Hammam OU=Employee, CN=Ahmed Hammam 686354,
E=ahmedhammam@slb.com
Reason: I am the author of this document Reason: I am the author of this document

663722 Location: your signing location here

Date: 2023.07.30 09:11:07+03'00'
686354 Location: your signing location here
Date: 2023.07.30 10:45:02+03'00'
Foxit Reader Version: 10.1.4 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: 10.1.4

Geomarket TLM Manager Approval (Required) Geomarket Operations Manager Approval (Required)
Approver’s Comments (optional): Approver’s Comments (optional):

Electronic Signature Electronic Signature

Approved (approve/decline first) Approved (approve/decline first)
Digitally signed by Mohamed Raslan 493363
Digitally signed by Ahmed Ragheb 493736
Approved with comment Mohamed
DN: DC=com, DC=slb, DC=DIR,
Approved with comment DN: DC=com, DC=slb, DC=DIR, OU=Accounts,
OU=Accounts, OU=Employee, CN=Mohamed
Raslan 493363, E=MRasslan@slb.com
Reason: I am the author of this document
Ahmed Ragheb OU=Employee, CN=Ahmed Ragheb 493736,
E=ARagheb@slb.com

Declined Raslan 493363 Location: your signing location here

Date: 2023.07.30 09:04:02+03'00'
Declined 493736
Reason: I am the author of this document
Location: your signing location here
Date: 2023-08-09 15:53:01
Foxit Reader Version: 10.1.4 Foxit Reader Version: 9.7.2
Equipment Modification Request (EMR)
Part II: To be Completed by Product Center –Well Services

Technical Expert Evaluation Worksheet -1 0 1

1. Does the modification enhance the overall equipment functionality / performance? (example: Improve No Impact Reduce
improve the pump rate, pressure range, engine load)

2. Does the modification improve the efficiency and/or operation of the equipment? (example: rig up Improve No Impact Reduce
time)
Reduce Risk No Impact Increase
3. How does the modification affect HSE risk? (example: structure of equipment, lifting hazard,
Risk
ergonomics)

4. Is the company that will do the modification qualified or an approved supplier and do they have Yes No
experience in this type of work?
Improve No Impact Reduce
5. Does the modification of the equipment increase the equipment's maintainability?

Yes No
6. Is this modification due to contractual requirements? (from the client)

Yes No
7. Is this modification due to local regulation requirements?

8. Does the modification affect the existing certification of equipment? (example: DNV, CE, ZONE II, No Effect Yes
Atex)
No Effect Yes
9. Does the modification affect the warranty of equipment?

Technical Expert Review (Required)

Yes No
1. Should this be approved for one time implementation for this unit only?

Yes No
2. Will the same model of equipment be approved if the same EMR is submitted in the future?

Yes No
3. Will this EMR be implemented (via Must Do bulletin) on all existing equipment in the field?

Yes No
4. Will this EMR be integrated into the design file to be included on all future production units?

Other Feedback/Comments: Electronic Signature

(enter evaluations first)

Intouch Ticket Number (InTouch use only):

Center TLM Manager Approval Product Line PSD Manager Approval Product Line OI Manager Approval
(Required) (Required) (Required if EMR has an HSE impact)
Approver’s Comments (optional): Approver’s Comments (optional): Approver’s Comments (optional):

Approved Approved Approved

Approved with comment Approved with comment Approved with comment
Declined Declined Declined
Electronic Signature (approve/decline first) Electronic Signature (approve/decline first) Electronic Signature (approve/decline first)