Document Code: CAS-F-CS

Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing

MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 1 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

UNIVERSITY VISION

In 2030, the Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation is a globally competitive university with high concentrations of talent, excellent teaching environment, rigorous program quality, sufficient resources, and
a culture of collaboration.

UNIVERSITY MISSION

The Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation is a private, non-stock, non-profit, non-sectarian educational foundation with a three-fold function – instruction, research and community service – offering
responsive and alternative programs supportive of national development goals and standards of global excellence.

GOAL

The Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation shall produce graduates who have research-based knowledge, leadership and managerial skills, and professionalism.

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES VISION

In 2030, the College of Arts and Sciences shall be a globally competitive liberal arts and sciences institution with high concentrations of talent, excellent teaching environment, rigorous program quality,
sufficient resources, and a culture of collaboration.
.
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES MISSION

The MSEUF College of Arts and Sciences shall produce competent professionals adequately prepared in the practice of their profession supportive of national development goals and standards of global
excellence.

PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES MISSION

Instruction Research Community
Service
1. Graduates shall have effective communication and teamwork skills, creativity and critical thinking.   
2. Graduates shall have skills and capacities to apply theories in various disciplines in accordance with high standards of ethics.   
3. Graduates shall become successful professionals serving local and international communities.   
4. Graduates shall have lifelong learning skills to facilitate changes in themselves and in their society.   
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 2 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

COURSE SPECIFICATIONS

NAME OF PROGRAM: GENERAL EDUCATION

Course Code: AW 100
Course Title: Academic Writing
Course Description: The course aims to provide students with writing and language techniques that are useful in writing a clear, coherent, logical texts. It will also cover the basic research writing
skills such as evaluating and referring to relevant literatures, note taking, summarizing, writing data commentary, research ethics, and APA/IEEE style citation.
Prerequisite: ENG 100 Co-requisite: None
Laboratory Contact/Hours per
Course Credits: 3 units Lecture Contact/Hours per Week: 3 hours NA
Week:
Total Contact Hours (for 18 Synchronous On- 4 hours (for major Synchronous Online
15 hours Asynchronous Session: 35 hours
weeks): ground Session: examinations) Session:
Class Limit Intake: Lecture: 40 students Laboratory: NA

Student Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives:

Program Educational
Student Outcomes Objectives
1 2 3 4
a. Critical, analytical, and creative thinking    
b. Application of different analytical modes (quantitative and qualitative, artistic and scientific, textual and visual, experimental, observation, etc.) in tackling problems    
methodically
c. Ability to contribute personally and meaningfully to the country’s development    
d. Application of computing and information technology to assist and facilitate research    
e. Problem solving (including real-world problems)    
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 3 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

Course Outcomes and Relationship to Student Outcomes:

Course Outcomes
a b c d e
After completing the course, the student must have the ability to:
1. demonstrate skills in academic writing which involves not only the accurate use of language but also the principles of effective paragraph structure; I I I I I
2. apply effective writing techniques and appropriate documentation style; R R R R R
3. interpret visual data and information using appropriate formats; and D D D D D
4. write academic and scholarly papers with an understanding of structure and mechanics. D D D D D
Level: I – Introduced R – Reinforced D – Demonstrated

INSTRUCTOR’S DETAILS

INSTRUCTOR’S NAME: Alexandra C. Jaballa CONTACT NUMBER/ EMAIL ADDRESS:

SCHEDULE FOR CONSULTATION: MW 04:00-05:30 INSTRUCTOR’S OFFICE: Faculty room/Online via Messenger

CLASS SCHEDULE

Term Week Topic Time Allotment (in hours)

Synchronous Asynchronous
1 Vision-Mission-Goal of the University 1 2
Program Educational Objectives
PRELIM

Course Orientation/Course Syllabus and Course Requirements/Introduction to the Course

2 Considerations in Academic Writing
1 2
Principles and Elements of Effective Writing
3-4 General-Specific Texts 2 3
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
1
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR COURSE OUTCOME 1
5 Problem-solution Texts 1 2
MIDTERM

Procedures and processes

6 Summarizing 1 2
Purpose and content of summary
Stages of summarizing
7 Paraphrasing 1 2
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 4 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

Effective paraphrasing
Paraphrasing techniques
Use of quotations
Organizing the references
8 References and Quotation: The APA Style 7th Edition/The IEEE Style 1 1
Purpose of references and citation
Main reference system
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
1
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR COURSE OUTCOME 2
9 ACADEMIC MENTAL HEALTH BREAK
10-11 Visual Information 2 4
Types of visual presentation
Functions and principles of visuals
SEMI-FINAL

Making the right choice

Creating the best design
Describing visuals and labelling
12-13 Writing a Data Commentary 2 3
Structure and vocabulary
Qualification and strength of claim
SEMIFINAL EXAMINATION
1
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR COURSE OUTCOME 3
14 Writing Critiques 1 2
Critical reading
Reviews/Critiques
FINAL

Reaction papers
15-16 The Research Template 2 4
Writing a Journal Manuscript
Writing an Abstract
17 Research Ethics 1 4
FINAL EXAMINATION
1
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR COURSE OUTCOME 4
18 Resit/Removal Examination 1 2

DETAILED COURSE LEARNING PLAN

 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 5 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

LEARNING FORMATIVE TOPIC(S) TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITY (TLA) EQUIPMENT, INDICATIVE

OUTCOME(S) ASSESSMENT SYNCHRONOUS MODE ASYNCHRONOUS MATERIALS, AND HOURS
MODE REFERENCES
LO: Enhanced Q and A Vision-Mission-Goal of the TA: Interactive discussion on TA: Giving instructions for Zoom or Microsoft Teams
awareness about the University the VMG, PEO, course the students to visit the Desktop/Laptop computer 1 hour
VMG, PEO, and course Program Educational Objectives syllabus and requirements, MSEUF website and enroll PowerPoint presentation (synchronous)
requirements NEO LMS in the NEO LMS
Course Syllabus and Course www.mseuf.edu.ph 2 hours
Requirements LA: Active participation in LA: Browsing of the MSEUF (asynchronous)
the interactive discussion website and enrollment in the NEO LMS
Introduction to the Course NEO LMS

Students should have Q and A Considerations in Academic TA: Interactive discussion on TA: Uploading of the course Desktop/Laptop computer 3 hours
the ability to: Writing the considerations in module in NEO LMS and PowerPoint presentation (synchronous)
Online quiz game Audience academic writing using giving online writing
LO 1.1: apply the Purpose and Strategy PowerPoint presentation, exercises Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 5 hours
principles and elements Written exercises Organization (2012). Academic writing (asynchronous)
of effective writing and Style LA: Active participation in LA: Accomplishment of the for graduate students.
the interactive discussion and writing exercises and Essential tasks and skills
LO 1.2: write texts Principles and Elements of Effective online quiz game submission in the NEO LMS (3rd ed.). USA: The
using appropriate Writing University of Michigan
structures. Press.
General-specific Texts
Sentence definitions Online module
Extended definitions
Generalization NEO LMS
Contrastive definitions Zoom/Microsoft
Comparative definitions Teams/RingCentral
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
Summative Assessment: Written Examination
CO1: Demonstrate skills in academic writing which involves not only the accurate use of language but also the
Number of Hour/s: 1 hour
principles of effective paragraph structure.
Assessment Tools: Rubrics, Answer Key for Written Examination
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 6 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

LEARNING FORMATIVE TOPIC(S) TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITY (TLA) EQUIPMENT, INDICATIVE

OUTCOME(S) ASSESSMENT SYNCHRONOUS MODE ASYNCHRONOUS MATERIALS, AND HOURS
MODE REFERENCES
Students should have Interactive quiz Problem-solution Texts TA: Interactive discussion TA: Uploading of course Desktop/Laptop computer 4 hours
the ability to: Procedures and processes about problem-solution texts, modules and providing PowerPoint presentation (synchronous)
Writing Exercises summarizing and writing exercises
LO 2.1: write texts Summarizing and Paraphrasing paraphrasing, and the Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 7 hours
using appropriate Portfolio project Purpose and content of referencing style appropriate LA: Online research on (2012). Academic writing (asynchronous)
structures; summary to their discipline specific topics given by the for graduate students.
Stages of summarizing instructor, accomplishment Essential tasks and skills
LO 2.2: write a Effective paraphrasing LA: Active participation in and submission of written (3rd ed.). USA: The
summary and Paraphrasing techniques the interactive discussion exercises via NEO LMS University of Michigan
paraphrase; and Use of quotations Press.
Organizing the references
LO 2.3: use APA/IEEE Online Modules
documentation style. References and Quotation: The
APA Style 7th Edition/The IEEE E-journals
Style
Purpose of references and NEO LMS
citation Zoom/Microsoft
Main reference system Teams/RingCentral
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Summative Assessment: Written Examination
CO2: Apply effective writing techniques and appropriate documentation style. Number of Hour/s: 1 hour
Assessment Tools: Rubrics, Answer Key for Written Examination
LEARNING FORMATIVE TOPIC(S) TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITY (TLA) EQUIPMENT, INDICATIVE
OUTCOME(S) ASSESSMENT SYNCHRONOUS MODE ASYNCHRONOUS MATERIALS, AND HOURS
MODE REFERENCES
Students should have Written exercises Visual Information TA: Interactive discussion, TA: Uploading of course Desktop/Laptop computer 4 hours
the ability to: Types of visual presentation video presentation, and modules, giving examples of PowerPoint presentation (synchronous)
Portfolio evaluation Functions and principles of quizlet about visual visual information and data
LO 3.2: interpret visual visuals information; discussion and commentaries Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 7 hours
information and data Critique papers Making the right choice demonstration on how to (2012). Academic writing (asynchronous)
and Creating the best design write data commentary and LA: Analysis of visual for graduate students.
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 7 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

Concept/Reaction Describing visuals and labelling
LO 3.2: write a data papers
commentary. Writing a Data Commentary
Structure and vocabulary
Qualification and strength of
claim
critique papers
LA: Active participation in
the interactive discussion and
quiz games
information; browsing of e- Essential tasks and skills
journals; submission of the (3rd ed.). USA: The
written exercises via NEO University of Michigan
LMS Press.
Online modules

E-journals

NEO LMS
Zoom/Microsoft
Teams/RingCentral
SEMI-FINAL EXAMINATION
Summative Assessment: Written Examination
CO3: Interpret visual data and information using appropriate formats. Number of Hour/s: 1 hour
Assessment Tools: Rubrics, Answer Key for Written Examination
LEARNING FORMATIVE TOPIC(S) TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITY (TLA) EQUIPMENT, INDICATIVE
OUTCOME(S) ASSESSMENT SYNCHRONOUS MODE ASYNCHRONOUS MATERIALS, AND HOURS
MODE REFERENCES
Students should have Writing exercises Writing Critiques TA: Presentation of the TA: Uploading of course Desktop/Laptop computer 4 hours
the ability to: Critical reading MSEUF Research Template, module and giving access PowerPoint presentation (synchronous)
LO 4.1: write Research work Reviews/Critiques discussion on how to write a links to research journal
critique papers; Reaction papers journal manuscript, abstract, articles to familiarize Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 10 hours
Critical analysis and research ethics that themselves with the parts (2012). Academic writing (asynchronous)
LO 4.2: demonstrate The Research Template should be observed for graduate students.
familiarity with the Reflection essay LA: Critical analysis of a Essential tasks and skills
research template and Writing a Journal Manuscript LA: Active participation in research journal article and (3rd ed.). USA: The
research ethics; and the interactive discussion writing of a reflection essay University of Michigan
Writing an Abstract about research Press.
LO 4.3: write a
publishable article. Research Ethics Online modules

E-journals
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 8 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

NEO LMS
Zoom/Microsoft
Teams/RingCentral
FINAL EXAMINATION
Summative Assessment: Written Examination
CO4: Write academic and scholarly papers with an understanding of structure and mechanics. Number of Hour/s: 1 hour
Assessment Tools: Rubrics, Answer Key for Written Examination
RESIT/REMOVAL EXAMINATION Number of Hours:
1 hour (synchronous) for the actual resit/removal examination)
2 hours (asynchronous) for the final course assessment

REFERENCES

A. Books
Butin, D.W. (2010). The education dissertation. Corwin/Sage.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2006). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
Guiyab-Riviera, G. (2008). Study and communication skills. C&E Publishing.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Howard, R. M. (2010). Writing matters: A handbook for writing and research. McGraw-Hill.
Lunenberg, F. C. (2008). Writing a successful thesis or dissertations: Tips and strategies for students in the social and behavioral sciences. Corwin Press.
Miller, A. B. (2009). Finish your dissertation once and for all: How to overcome psychological barriers get results, and more on with your life. American Psychological Association.
Muschla, G. R. (2007). Teach terrific writing. McGraw-Hill.
Rai, A. (2006). Communication skills: Speaking and writing in English. Sterling.
Reynolds, J. (2011). Check point English. Hodder Education.
Rothstein, A. (2007). Writing as learning: A content-based approach. Corwin Press.
Uy, C. L. (2008). Fundamentals of writing for college. Mindshapers.
Villanueva, P. M. (2009). Improving your writing skills. Books Atbp.
White, E.B. & Strunk, W. (2000). Elements of style (5th ed.). Macmillan Publishing.
Wyse, D. (2006). The good writing guide for education students. Sage Publications.
B. Electronic Sources
Academic writing. (2020). http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/1/2/
Advise on academic writing. (n.d.). http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice
American Psychological Association. (2019). APA style. http://www.apastyle.org/
Chirnside, A. (2009). Academic writing style. http://www2.napier.ac.uk/gus/ writing_presenting/style.html
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 9 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

Textbook:
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students. Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). The University of Michigan Press.

COURSE EVALUATION

COURSE REQUIREMENTS Each student is required to:

 attend at least 66% (2/3) of the number of hours for synchronous sessions;
 submit required course outputs; and
 pass the major examinations.
GRADING POLICY HyFlex learning outputs (40%) + Prelim exam grade (30%) + Midterm exam grade (30%) = Midterm Period Grade (100%)
HyFlex learning outputs (40%) + Semifinal exam grade (30%) + Final exam grade (30%) = Final Period Grade (100%)
Midterm Period Grade (40%) + Final Period Grade (60%) = Final Grade (100%)

Students must obtain 75% to pass. For CME students, they need to obtain at least 50%.
RESIT/RETAKING POLICY Failure in formative assessment: no resit
Failure in summative assessment: 2 re-sit allowed, 1 without remediation & 1 with remediation
Failing the 2nd re-sit means failing the course (5.0)

The following table will be used in giving the final grades:

Percentage Equivalent 74 and below 75-77 78 - 80 81-83 84-86 87-88 89-91 92-94 95-97 98-100
Final Grade 5.00 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00

Rubrics will be used for other types of assessment such as return demonstration, simulation, etc.

1 2 3 4 5
BEGINNING DEVELOPING APPROACHING PROFICIENCY PROFICIENT ADVANCE
(Minimal and Limited Evidence of (Some evidence of Achievement) (Adequate Evidence of Achievement) (Commendable Achievement) (Exceptional Achievement)
Achievement)
75 - 77 78 - 80 81 - 83 84 - 86 87 - 88 89 - 91 92 - 94 95 - 97 98 – 100

Aside from academic deficiency, other grounds for a failing grade are:
1. failing academic standing and failure to take the examination/s;
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 10 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

2. grave misconduct other than cheating; and

3. excessive absences/failure to communicate with the instructor/professor.

COURSE POLICIES

a. Student Participation/Attendance
Student participation shall be monitored based on the modality used. There will be 15-hours synchronous sessions and 39 hours asynchronous sessions. Schedule of the synchronous sessions may be agreed
upon by the faculty and students, but no synchronous sessions should be scheduled beyond 9:30 p.m. On-ground synchronous sessions will be determined based on the course outcomes.
b. Submission of Assessment Tasks/Outputs
Submission of assessment tasks and other requirements will be based on the agreement made by the students and faculty. Students can submit their requirements online if they have connectivity or offline via
courier if without connectivity.
c. Missed Work or Examination
Any student who missed any graded formative assessment activities (exercises, quiz, assignment, output paper, project, etc.) or take a test should consult the concerned instructor about the compliance.
d. Academic Integrity
Students are expected to observe the MSEUF Policy on Hybrid Flexible Learning Academic Integrity in the performance of various activities and outputs as gesture of respect to their own work and the work
of their peers. Corresponding sanction/s may be imposed if student is found guilty of violating the policy on academic integrity.
e. Course Decorum
Students are expected to observe proper etiquette and avoid disruptive behaviors during synchronous sessions.
f. Major Examinations
There will be four major examinations – Preliminary, Midterm, Semifinal, and Final Examinations – covering the intended COs. The major examinations are the summative assessment of the COs. The
examinations may be conducted on-ground (written or practical) or online (critical thinking type, qualitative, case/project-based) depending on the student outcomes to be achieved.
g. Issuance of Mid-Term Grade
The mid-term grade is issued to students so that formal consultation where students are apprised of their class standing is done to afford them the opportunity to make up and to cope with the rigors of the
course.
h. Course Portfolio
Selected assessment tools are to be compiled and collected before the end of the semester. The selection is based on statistical data gathering (lowest, median, and highest). Learning tasks and examinations
with marks lowest, median and highest must be photocopied and returned to the Instructor/professor for course portfolio keeping.
i. Language of Instruction
Lectures, discussions and documentation will be in English. Written and spoken work may receive a lower mark if the student is deficient in English.
j. Consultation Schedule
For this course, students may consult online with the Instructor/Professor on the agreed time and date. It is recommended that the student set an appointment first to confirm the Instructor/Professor’s
availability.
k. Resit/Re-examination
 Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in AW 100 Academic Writing
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Page No.: Page 11 of 11
An Autonomous University Revision No.: 7
Lucena City Effectivity Date: 15 August 2022
Prepared by: Instructor
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Reviewed by: Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

QUALITY FORM

After the instructor/professor has computed the final grade of the student, and he obtains a failing grade, the student has one chance for a resit/re-examination on the schedule set by the instructor/professor.
Failure to take the resit/re-examination on the announced schedule forfeits the student’s chance.
.
REVISION HISTORY

NO DATE
0 June 4, 2012
1 June 2, 2014
2 June 8, 2015
3 January 5, 2017
4 August 4, 2018
5 January 11, 2019
6 August 14, 2020
7 August 12, 2022
REVISIONS
Initial Release
Revised to OBE Format
Revised the contents based on the 2015 Curriculum Mapping
Added newly acquired library references
Revised the mission, vision, PEO, and student outcomes
Revised the format and included course learning outcomes for each period
Revised the format for flexible learning
Revised the format for hybrid flexible learning

PREPARED BY: REVIEWED/VALIDATED BY: APPROVED BY: DATE OF EFFECTIVITY:

CLAUDIA ODETTE J. AYALA, PhD 15 August 2022

Instructor Department Chair Dean
Date: Date: Date: