Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DISEDIAKAN OLEH
GROUP 4
1.3.1 to assess the 1.4.1 Does inquiry-based science Ha1 : There is a significant 1. Normality test
influence of inquiry- learning influence the creativity of influence Inquiry-based science 2. T-test if data are normally
based science learning youngChildren? learning on early childhood 3. Mann Whitney test if data are not
on the creativity of creativity. normally
early childhood science
learning.
1.3.2 to assess the 1.4.2 Does inquiry-based science Ha2: There is a significant 1. Normality test
influence of inquiry- learning influence young children's influence Inquiry-based science 2. T-test if data are normally
based science learning attitudes towards science? learning on young children's 3. Mann Whitney test if data are not
on attitudes towards attitudes towards science. normally
science in early
childhood
Data Analysis
Research Questions 1 : Does inquiry-based science learning influence the creativity of youngChildren?
Ha1 : There is a significant influence Inquiry-based science learning on early childhood creativity
Step 1: Normality test
The normality test is carried out to find out whether students' creativity data is normally distributed or not. The test tool used is the Kolmogorov-
Smirnov test with the help of the SPSS application.
Based on the normality test table, it can be seen that the Sig value (p=0.017) < α (0.05), meaning that the sample data is normally distributed.
Graphically, this is shown in the two graphics below. This conclusion implies that the different test used is the t-test.
T-Test
Step 2
T-test
The t test is used to determine the significance of differences in the average value of students' creativity. The t-test was used because in the
normality test, it was found that the students' creativity data was normally distributed
The table above states that the Sig value (2-tailed) is p=0.00 < α (0.05). These results indicate that Ha1 is accepted. This means that there is a
real difference between the average creativity scores of the experimental class and the control class. The previous table states that the average
score of the experimental class was 3.81 while the control class got an average score of 2.77
.
Research Questions 2 : Does inquiry-based science learning influence young children's attitudes towards science?
Ha2 : There is a significant influence Inquiry-based science learning on young children's attitudes towards science
Step 1
Normality test
Based on the normality test table, it can be seen that the Sig value (p=0.19)> α (0.05), meaning that the sample data is not normally distributed.
Graphically, this is shown in the two graphics below. This conclusion implies that the difference test used is the Mann Whitney test.
Step 2
Uji Mann Whitney
The table above states that the Sig value (2-tailed) is p=0.00 < α (0.05). These results indicate that Ha1 is accepted. What this means is that
there is a real difference between the average attitude scores towards science for the experimental class and the control class. The previous
table states that the average score for the experimental class was 22.19 while the control class obtained an average score of 7.86.
Conclusion
Based on the results of the analysis above, it can be concluded that:
1. There is a significant influence Inquiry-based science learning on early childhood creativity
2. There is a significant influence Inquiry-based science learning on young children's attitudes towards science