You are on page 1of 3

Risk Assessment No: 01, Date: 06.08.

2021

Scope: Manufacturing and Delivery – Covid-19 Impact Assessment

Assessed by: Al Alagappan, Priya Kapoor, Shreeram Raja, Rakesh Pahuja, Niveditha Murali

Scope: Manufacturing & Delivery


Severity rate Consequence
1 Actual Delivery date < Target Delivery date
2 Actual Delivery date = Target Delivery date
3 Delay in delivery & accepted by client
4 Delay in delivery and attracts Liquidated damages

Process / Areas of Risk Covid situation Severity Risk Analysis Action Plan
RFQ to APAR N/A Within 24 hours
APAR Quote to EESA N/A  Time Delay in sending quotation Within 48 – 72 hours
Submit to Client N/A  Time Delay in submission Within 24 hours
Client PO to EESA N/A
EESA PO to APAR N/A Checklist not available – list of documents to be  Data sheets and drum schedule to be shared
sent to APAR – delay in production start time with APAR asap to help production start as
planned
 Checklist to be prepared by Prasad and
shared with EESA for tracking

Any  Shipment delay from RM supplier to APAR  Request APAR to send us the list of
 Delay in movement to port materials sourced from overseas/ internal
 Delay in Local customs clearance at port (material source declaration) and status of
movement of materials/ issues
Import material overseas  Stock status sent to EESA for every project
to APAR and EESA should follow up until stock arrival
 Understand the mode of transport from
overseas to APAR
 APAR to come up with alternative plan to
expedite sourcing RMs/ Packing materials

Page |1
Risk Assessment No: 01, Date: 06.08.2021

Scope: Manufacturing and Delivery – Covid-19 Impact Assessment

Assessed by: Al Alagappan, Priya Kapoor, Shreeram Raja, Rakesh Pahuja, Niveditha Murali

No covid

Covid, Reduced  Reliability on single manufacturer  Request from different manufacturer


scale production  Possible delay in production schedule  Request client for a priority cables list and
to 30% realign our production plan
 Request to customer well in advance for
extension of delivery time
Manufacturing process  Request APAR to come up with a plan to
arrange stay for employees inside the plant
 Request APAR to prioritize EESA projects
 Request APAR to arrange for weekend shifts

Covid, Full  No progress in production  Request customer for extension of delivery


shutdown

No Covid
FAT Covid QC testing has been moved virtual. Hence no
impact
Shipping Roll over/ Trans-  Delay in delivery due to congestion in trans-  Request FF to liaise with vessel carrier to
shipment delay shipment ports prioritize and expedite
 Request client for delivery date extension
 Movement of goods can be planned well in
advance, which goes hand and hand with
the production plan/ container availability
and prevent any delay there
 Re rerouting options to be explored
 Break bulk/ chartered vessel load option to
be considered

Page |2
Risk Assessment No: 01, Date: 06.08.2021

Scope: Manufacturing and Delivery – Covid-19 Impact Assessment

Assessed by: Al Alagappan, Priya Kapoor, Shreeram Raja, Rakesh Pahuja, Niveditha Murali

 Sea priority option considered


No Container  Delay in movement of good from factory to  APAR plan to pick up containers well before
available port the FAT date
 APAR production plan to include packing list
predictions/ container pick up date
Increase in price  Impact on margins  Negotiate with customer on cost hikes and
convince them to co-bear the cost with EESA
 Advance space booking/ frame agreement
with FF on forecasted orders
 Directly liaising with carriers
Vessel space not  Delay in movement of good from factory to  EESA to plan and work closely with APAR
available port production schedules
Strike at port  Delay in delivery  Plan to bring the good through a different
port and absorb the additional local delivery
Local Delivery charge
Lockdown due  Delay in delivery  Request customer for extension of delivery
to covid date

Page |3

You might also like