ISYS3416 – Software Engineering for IT

Peer Performance Evaluation

Project Title
Group 24 - PetPal
Evaluator’s Name
Le Thien Son

Role and Responsibilities

Team Member’s Name Task Given
Constraints 2.2.1 -> 2.2.4 writing, class diagram creation and UI, sequence diagrams
A. Do Le Trang Hanh
for according use cases.
Introduction writing, gantt chart creation and UI, sequence diagrams for according use
B. Nguyen Minh Quan
cases.
Constraints 2.2.1 -> 2.2.7 writing, help with object diagram creation and UI, sequence
C. Nguyen Duy Khang
diagrams for according use cases.

Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Fair (3.5 to >2.5) Poor (2.5 to >0) Student A Student B Student C
Demonstrates Generally, Communication is Struggle to 5 5 4
clear and concise communicates average but may communicate
Communication: communication well but may require effectively, resulting
(Effectively skills, actively occasionally improvement I in misunderstandings
communicate listens, and encounter clarity or or a lack of clarity.
ideas, conveys thoughts difficulties in attentiveness.
information, and effectively. conveying ideas
concerns. or actively
listening.

Responsiveness: Consistently Generally Responses are Frequently 5 5 5

Promptness and responds promptly responsive but sometimes unresponsive or fails
willingness to and efficiently to occasionally delayed or require to meet deadlines,
respond to messages, may experience follow-ups to causing delays or
messages, requests, and delays or ensure disruptions.
requests, and deadlines. require completion.
deadlines. reminders.
Consistently Generally Some Often fails to deliver 5 5 5
delivers high- reliable but may inconsistencies in work on time or
Reliability:
quality work, occasionally fulfilling tasks or fulfill commitments,
Dependability
meets deadlines, encounter meeting causing disruptions
and consistency
and fulfills difficulties in deadlines, to the team.
in fulfilling tasks
commitments. meeting requiring
and
deadlines or reminders or
commitment.
fulfilling additional
commitments. support.
Actively Generally, Demonstrates Struggles to 5 5 5
Teamwork:
participates, works well with average teamwork collaborate
Collaborate
cooperates, and others but may skills but may effectively, resulting
effectively with
contributes to the encounter require in conflicts or
others and
team’s goals, occasional improvement in hindrances to the
contribute to a
fostering a difficulties in collaboration or team’s progress.
positive team
positive team collaboration or contribution.
dynamic.
environment. contribution.
Total 20 20 19
Comment:
In general, the flow of work of our team in this assignment has significantly improved compared to last
assignment. I think this is due to everyone feeling more comfortable with each other. Specifically, our communication
is much better, being able to talk to each other in a casual manner really helps with conveying our ideas with each
other. We also know more about each person strong points to assign tasks appropriately, for example Hanh is very
careful therefore she serves as a leader for our team, keeping track of each members work and track the progress of the
report itself, Khang has a good English foundation so he is in charged of spotting grammatical errors and giving
suggestion on how we can improve our writing, Quan’s role in our project is the technology savvy guy, familiarizing
us with new tools and overall fixing minor things in our designs, as for me I would say that I am in charge of
visualizing the application and driving our project forward. In conclusion, through this second project we as a team
have found the harmony in how to work with each other, and have improved our relationship.