Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
A M A N DA B R O C K
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© The several contributors 2022
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2013
Second Edition published in 2022
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Public sector information reproduced under Open Government Licence v3.0
(http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/open-government-licence.htm)
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2021946683
ISBN 978–0–19–886234–5
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198862345.001.0001
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Oxford University Press would like to thank the following organisations and/or
individuals for granting permission for the use of their logos for the cover of this
book:
All Things Open (‘All Things Open’ logo)
Python Software Foundation (‘Python’ and the Python logos are trademarks or re-
gistered trademarks of the Python Software Foundation, used by Oxford University
Press with permission from the Foundation.)
Docker, Inc. (Docker and the Docker logo are trademarks or registered trademarks
of Docker, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.)
GNOME Foundation (The GNOME logo and GNOME name are registered
trademarks or trademarks of GNOME Foundation in the United States or other
countries.)
Rust Foundation
Vietsch Foundation (‘Vietsch Foundation’ logo)
Open Source Initiative (The OSI logo trademark is the trademark of Open Source
Initiative)
Percona, LLC (‘Percona’ logo)
Nextcloud GmbH (Nextcloud and the Nextcloud Logo is a registered trademark of
Nextcloud GmbH. in Germany and/or other countries.)
Open Innovation Network LLC (‘Open Innovation Network’ logo)
Tidelift, Inc. (‘Tidelift’ logo)
Canonical Limited (‘Ubuntu’ logo - Canonical Limited, Ubuntu, London)
Weaveworks, Inc. (‘Weaveworks’ logo - (c) 2014-2022 Weaveworks, Inc. All rights
reserved.)
The Linux Foundation (The ‘Kubernetes’ logo is a registered trademark of The
Linux Foundation)
Larry Ewing (‘The Tux’ and ‘The GIMP’ logos)
OpenUK (‘OpenUK’ logo)
This book has been a labour of love and is dedicated to the boys I love—Ronan, Rhys,
and Dundee—and to the memory of my father, Chick, for whom I spent twenty-five
years being a lawyer.
Contents
Foreword xvii
Keith Bergelt
Abbreviations xix
Contributors xxv
Table of Cases xxxi
Table of Legislation xxxvii
Introduction xliii
PA RT 1 I N T E L L E C T UA L P R O P E RT Y, C O R P O R AT E ,
A N D G OV E R NA N C E
PA RT 2 T H E BU SI N E S S O F O P E N : E C O N OM IC S ,
O P E N S O U R C E M O D E L S , A N D U S AG E
PA RT 3 EV E RY T H I N G O P E N
Appendix 539
Index 557
Foreword
Keith Bergelt, CEO, Open Invention Network
Amanda Brock is CEO of OpenUK, the UK organisation for the business of Open
Technology (open source software, open hardware and open data); elected Board Member,
Open Source Initiative; appointed member of the Cabinet Office’s Open Standards Board;
Member of the British Computer Society Inaugural Influence Board; Advisory Board
Member, KDE, Planet Crust, Sustainable Digital Infrastructure Alliance and Mimoto;
Charity Trustee Creative Crieff and GeekZone; and European Representative of the Open
Invention Network. Amanda was awarded the UK Lifetime Achievement Award in the
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards, 2022, and included in Computer Weekly’s Most
Influential Women and The UK Leaders in Tech long lists in 2021 and 2022. A lawyer of
25 years’ experience, she previously chaired the Open Source and IP Advisory Group of
the United Nations Technology Innovation Labs, sat on the OASIS Open Projects and UK
Government Energy Sector Digitalisation Task Force Advisory Boards and been an ad-
visor to a number of start-ups including Beamery and Everseen. With law degrees from
the University of Glasgow, New York University and Queen Mary and Westfield, University
of London, Amanda was part of the first cohort to study internet law in the UK. She then
spent 25 years practising law and almost 20 of those across companies in a variety of sec-
tors, with a strong technology focus. She was the first lawyer working on the ISP Freeserve
from 1999 and a member of the team which took it to IPO. She joined Canonical early
stage as General Counsel setting up and running the global legal team for 5 years from
2008. A frequent international keynote speaker, Amanda writes regularly for the tech-
nology press, is Editor of Open Source, Law, Policy and Practice, being published by Oxford
University Press in October 2022 with open access sponsored by the Vietsch Foundation.
Listed as one of 20 CEO’s to Watch at https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activ
ity:6777656310428135424/, https://www.linkedin.com/in/amandabrocktech
Malcolm Bain is an English solicitor and Spanish abogado based in Barcelona, working for
the last twenty years in ICT law and focusing on Open Source and open content projects.
He has advised universities, government, industry, and startups on intellectual property
strategy, management, and licensing, and participated in many conferences and seminars
on the legal aspects of Open Source and open data. He is a member of FSF-Europe and
CATPL, the Catalan association for free software businesses.
Miriam Belhausen is a partner at Bird & Bird, LLP, specialising in technology, software,
digital media, copyright, data, and data protection law with a particular focus on the collab-
orative development of Open Source software, open data, and open hardware. She served
on the advisory council of the Legal Network of the Free Software Foundation Europe and
has been involved in several Open Source enforcement cases in Germany. In her daily work,
she regularly works with clients on implementing Open Source licence compliance program
and advises them on all issues related to Open Source.
xxvi Contributors
Knut Blind took his Bachelor’s degree at Brock University (Canada), prior to finishing his
Diploma in Economics and later his doctoral degree at Freiburg University. Since 1996, he
joined the Fraunhofer Society. Currently, he is head of ‘Innovation and Regulation’ at the
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research located in in Karlsruhe, Germany.
In April 2006, he was appointed Professor of Innovation Economics at the Faculty of
Economics and Management at the Technische Universität Berlin. Between 2008 and 2016,
he held also the endowed chair of standardisation at the Rotterdam School of Management
of the Erasmus University.
Mirko Böhm is an Open Source software contributor to the KDE Desktop, the Open
Invention Network, the Open Source Initiative, and other projects. He is a visiting lecturer
and researcher on Open Source software at the Technical University of Berlin, a certified
Qt specialist and trainer and a fellow of the Openforum Academy. He leads software engi-
neering projects at Mercedes-Benz where he applies a wide range of experience as an entre-
preneur, corporate manager, software developer, and German Air Force officer. He lives
with his wife, two children, and two cats in Berlin, Germany.
Michael Cheng is a former network engineer, M&A Attorney, and product manager. He
is currently Vice President, Head of Corporate, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Intellectual
Property at Dapper Labs. Prior to this, Michael was a product manager at Facebook/Meta
where he represented the company as the face of its investments in Open Source. He has
previously served on the Linux Foundation Board of Directors (Member), ML Commons
(Treasurer), Confidential Computing Consortium (Board Member), Urban Computing
Foundation (Board Member), OpenChain (Board Member), Open Invention Network
Technical Advisory Committee (Member), and the Magma Foundation (Board Chair).
Pamela S. Chestek is the principal of Chestek Legal in Raleigh, North Carolina. She coun-
sels creative communities on Open Source software, brand, and marketing matters. Prior
to returning to private practice, she held in-house positions at footwear, apparel, and high
technology companies and was an adjunct law professor teaching a course on trademark law
and unfair competition. She is a frequent author of scholarly articles, and her blog, Property,
Intangible, provides analysis of current intellectual property case law. She is admitted to
practice in California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Massachusetts, New York, and
North Carolina, and has been certified by the North Carolina Board of Legal Specialization
in Trademark Law.
Mishi Choudhary is a technology lawyer. The Open magazine calls her an emerging legal
guardian of the free and open Internet. She is the Legal Director of the New York-based
Software Freedom Law Center and Partner at Moglen & Associates. She has served as the
primary legal representative of many of the world’s most significant free software developers
and non-profit distributors. She advises technology startups and established businesses
around the world on Open Source software licensing and strategy. In 2010, she founded
SFLC.in. Under her direction, SFLC.in has become the premier non-profit organisation rep-
resenting the rights of Internet users and free software developers in India.
community in the world through the OpenChain Project, spearheading the licensing team
that elevated Open Invention Network into the largest patent non-aggression community
in history and establishing the first global network for Open Source legal experts. He is a
founder of both the first law journal and the first law book dedicated to Open Source. He
currently leads the OpenChain Project, acts as an advisor to both World Mobile and Asylum
Labs, and is a General Assembly Member of OpenForum Europe.
Toby Crick is a partner in Bristows LLP’s technology group and advises on and negoti-
ates commercial, technology, and outsourcing agreements. He has particular expertise in
working with clients to help them manage and structure complex deals and is recognised for
his work on digital transformation projects and his work with clients to manage Open Source
software in regulated environments. He is a Trustee of the UK’s Society for Computers and
Law and lectures widely on IT, e-commerce, cloud computing, agile software development,
and outsourcing including at ITechLaw, University College London (where he teaches on
Open Source) and Queen Mary University of London.
Richard Fontana is Senior Commercial Counsel at Red Hat. He specialises in legal matters
relating to software development, with a focus on Open Source. He is a former board dir-
ector of the Open Source Initiative. Fontana was previously Senior Director and Associate
General Counsel for Cloud and Open Source at Hewlett-Packard and Counsel at the
Software Freedom Law Center. Earlier in his career he practised intellectual property and
antitrust law. He is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School (Juris Doctor), Yale
University (Master of Science in Computer Science), and Wesleyan University (Bachelor of
Arts in History).
Ross Gardler has been working on Open Source software for close to twenty-five years,
participating in many projects with a focus on building healthy collaboration environments
that create opportunities for open innovation across multiple fields. He served for a number
of years as the President of the Apache Software Foundation and currently serves on the
Board of Directors for OASIS Open at the intersection of rapid Open Source software in-
novation and stable interoperability through the slower but more precise standards process.
He currently works for Microsoft contributing to the growth of Linux workloads on Azure.
Andrew Katz is a solicitor practising in England and has specialised in open technologies
for over 25 years. He leads the Technology team at Moorcrofts LLP in the Thames Valley and
has advised businesses, governments, non-governmental organisations, and foundations
around the world on open licensing and governance. He is co-author of the CERN Open
Hardware Licence, and is a visiting researcher at Queen Mary University of London and
the University of Skövde. He lectures frequently, and has written numerous papers on open
technologies. He was lead open hardware author on the European Commission’s 2021 Paper
on the Impact of Open Source Software and Hardware on the EU Economy. He has written
and released software under the GPL.
Jilayne Lovejoy is a US lawyer and community leader who has held various community and
in-house roles related to Open Source. She co-leads the Software Package Data Exchange®
(SPDX) legal team, helps maintain the SPDX License List, and co-authored the FINOS Open
Source License Compliance Handbook, an open-licensed human and machine-readable
xxviii Contributors
handbook for licence compliance. Currently, she is product counsel at Red Hat working on
a variety of issues. Prior roles include legal counsel at Canonical and principal Open Source
counsel at Arm, where she drove improved processes related to Open Source, including
forming and chairing the Arm Open Source Office.
P McCoy Smith is the Founding Attorney at Lex Pan Law LLC, a full-service technology
and intellectual property law firm, and Opsequio LLC, an Open Source consultancy, both
in Portland, Oregon, USA. He spent 20 years at a Fortune 50 multinational technology
company as an intellectual property attorney, where he ran Open Source legal policies.
He spent eight years in private practice, as a patent litigator and prosecutor, in a New York
City-based law firm, and three years as a patent examiner at the US Patent & Trademark
Office. He has an honours engineering degree (Colorado State University), a graduate lib-
eral arts degree (Johns Hopkins University), and a law degree (University of Virginia). He
also taught the US patent bar exam, and is on the editorial board of the Journal of Open Law,
Technology & Society. He is licensed to practice law in Oregon, California, and New York,
and to prosecute patent and trademark applications in the US and Canadian Patent &
Trademark Offices.
Iain G Mitchell KC is a member of the Scottish and English Bars, ranked in Chambers
Directory and the Legal 500 for Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property and
Information Technology law. He is Chair of the Scottish Society for Computers and Law, the
UK expert on the IT Committee of the CCBE, and past Chair of its Surveillance Working
Group. He is a member of the IT Panel of the Bar Council of England & Wales. the legal
panel of Open UK and an Honorary Lecturer in IT Law at Münster University. He is a joint
editor of the Journal of Open Law, Technology and Society.
Carlo Piana is a qualified lawyer in Italy and an Open Source software advocate. Former
General Counsel to the Free Software Foundation Europe, which he represented along with
the Samba Team in cornerstone antitrust cases to ensure freedom of interoperability in the
PC and Internet market. In the 2022 he was elected to the Board of the Open Source Initiative
and became a member of the Steering Committee of the Eclipse Oniro Working Group. He
acted in the first reported GPL enforcement case in Italy. He is a founding member of Array,
a boutique IT law firm, and a partner of OpenChain.
Mark Radcliffe is a senior partner who practises in DLA Piper’s Silicon Valley office and
is Co-Chair of its Blockchain and Digital Assets practice. He has been advising on Open
Source matters for over twenty years, with projects ranging from the development of the
dual licensing model to the open sourcing of the Sun Microsystems’ Solaris operating
Contributors xxix
system. He serves as outside general counsel of the Open Source Initiative and Apache
Software Foundation on a pro bono basis. He is applying this experience to blockchain
and non-fungible token issues. He has written and spoken extensively on Open Source
legal issues.
Nithya A Ruff is the Head of the Amazon Open Source Program Office. She drives Open
Source culture and coordination inside of Amazon and engagement with external commu-
nities. Prior to Amazon, she started and grew Comcast and Western Digital’s Open Source
Program Offices. Nithya has been director-at-large on the Linux Foundation Board for the
past five years and in 2019 was elected Chair of the influential Linux Foundation Board. She
works actively to advance the mission of the Linux Foundation around building sustainable
ecosystems that are built on open collaboration. She is a passionate advocate and a speaker
for opening doors to new and diverse people in technology and often speaks and writes on
this topic. She graduated with an MS in Computer Science from NDSU and an MBA from
the University of Rochester, Simon Business School and is an aspiring corporate board dir-
ector and governance enthusiast.
Karen Sandler is an attorney and executive director of the Software Freedom Conservancy
(SFC), a non-profit organisation focused on ethical technology. She is known as a ‘cy-
borg lawyer’ for her advocacy for software freedom as a life-or-death issue. She co-
organises Outreachy, an internship program for those facing under- representation,
systemic bias, or discrimination in tech. She is a Lecturer-in-Law at Columbia Law
School. Prior to SFC, Karen was executive director of the GNOME Foundation.
Before that, she was general counsel of the Software Freedom Law Center.
She received her JD from Columbia Law School where she was a James Kent Scholar, and her
engineering degree from the Cooper Union.
Charles-H Schulz is a French technologist, free software and open standards advocate.
As a long-time contributor to the OpenOffice.org project, he helped grow its community
from a few, mostly European communities to over 100 communities and teams of various
sizes. He also contributed to the development and adoption of the OpenDocument Format
standard through the company he co-founded, Ars Aperta. A former director of the OASIS
Consortium, he has engaged in various digital public policy debates at the European level.
He is a founding member and one of the former directors of the Document Foundation,
home of the LibreOffice project. He has been working in governmental cybersecurity for
several years and is one of the current board members of the Open Information Security
Foundation, and Chief Strategy Officer of Vates, the main developer of the XCP-ng
hypervisor.
Kate Stewart works with the safety, security, and licence compliance communities to ad-
vance the adoption of best practices into embedded Open Source projects. She was one
of the founders of SPDX and is currently the specification coordinator. Since joining
the Linux Foundation, she has launched the ELISA and Zephyr Projects, as well as sup-
porting other embedded projects. With over thirty years of experience in the software in-
dustry, she has held a variety of roles in software development, architecture, and product
management, primarily in the tooling and embedded ecosystem working with inter-
national teams.
xxx Contributors
Dr Nikolaus Thumm is Senior Scientific Advisor with the ETH Board in Zurich, Switzerland,
and Associate with Technical University Berlin. Prior to this, he worked for the European
Commission where he was responsible to set up a work program on standardisation,
standard essential patents, licensing, and Open Source. Until 2013, he was Chief Economist
of the European Patent Office. Before this, he worked as Senior Economic Counsellor for the
Swiss Intellectual Property Office. He was chairman of the United Nations’ Advisory Group
on the Protection and Implementation of Intellectual Property Rights for Investment, a
private-public partnership group. Nikolaus lead numerous international research activ-
ities and holds many publications in the field of standardisation, patenting, and intellectual
property protection.
Stephen Walli is a principal program manager in the Open Source Ecosystem Team in the
Azure Office of the CTO. He has collaborated on standards and Open Source projects for
more than thirty years. He is a board member to the Eclipse Foundation and chairs the
Eclipse SDV Working Group, and chairs the Confidential Computing Consortium (Linux
Foundation). He is also adjunct faculty at Johns Hopkins, teaching Open Source Software
Engineering, and is developing the Semesters of Code program. He is working group
chair for an IEEE standard on recommended practices for Open Source software project
governance.
Table of Cases
Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v Sweden, Appl. Nr. 40397/12, ECtHR (5th Sec.),
19 February 2013 ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9
Commission v CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA (Case C-496/99) [2004] ECR 2004 I-03801������������445
Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab (Case C-513/99) [2002] ECR I-7251����������������������������������� 441
European Commission v The Netherlands (Case C-359/93) [1995] ECR I-15������������������� 440
EVN AG and Weinstrom GmbH v Austria (Case C-448/01) [2003] ECR I-14558��������� 441–42
Fabricom SA v Belgium (Joined Cases C-21/03 and C-34/03) [2005] ECR I-1577 ����������� 439
FRANCE
EDU 4 v AFPA, Cour d’Appel de Paris, Pole 5, Chambre 10, no: 294�������������������������������104–5
GERMANY
Anmerkung zu OLG Düsseldorf, U. v. 24.04.2012–I-20 U 176/11��������������������������������������� 186
ITALY
Assoli v Ministero del Lavoro (TAR (Regional administrative court) Lazio,
Decision no 428 of 23/01/2007����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 447
SECAP SpA and Santorso Soc. Cooparl v Comune di Torino C-147/06 and
C-148/06 [2008] ECR I-03565 ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 433
POLAND
Decision of Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza of 13 January 2009 (file no: KIO/UZP 1502/08)����������449
Decision of Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza of 5 August 2009
(file no: KIO/UZP 961/09) ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 449
UNITED KINGDOM
Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd [2007] RPC 7 ��������������������������������������������������������������������� 218
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others,
Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [2012] 1 CMLR 29����������������������������������������� 26
R (on the application of Chandler) v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and
Families (2010) CMLR 19������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 434
SAS Inst. Inc. v World Programming Ltd. [2013] EWCA Civ 1482��������������������������������������� 79
SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWHC 69 (Ch)������������������������������������� 4
Sidey Ltd v Clackmannanshire Council and Pyramid Joinery and
Construction Ltd [2010] SLT 607������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 434
Sidey Ltd v Clackmannanshire Council [2012] SLT 334�����������������������������������������������434, 438
St Albans City & DC v International Computers Ltd., [1996] 4 All ER 481����������������������������� 6
Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents [2008] EWCA Civ 1066����������������������������� 218
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark v IBM UK Ltd
[2011] EWHC 549 (TCC)����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6
UNITED STATES
100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care, Inc. v 100 Blacks Who Care, Inc.,
Opposition No 91190175, 2011 WL 1576733 (TTAB 12 April 2011) ������������������������� 202
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v Neapco Holdings LLC, 939 F.3d 1355
(Fed. Cir. 2019)������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 220
Apple Computer, Inc. v Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d 1240 (3d Cir. 1983),
cert. dism’d by stip., 464 US 1033 (1984)���������������������������������������������������������������������72–73
Apple Inc. v Psystar Corp., 658 F.3d 1150, C.A.9 (Cal.), 2011������������������������������������������������� 26
Autodesk, Inc v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp, 685 F. Supp. 2d 1001,
1009 (N.D. Cal. 2009)��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 209
Capitol Records LLC v ReDigi Inc., No. 12 Civ. 95 (RJS), 30 March 2013�����������������������26–27
Century 21 Real Estate Corp v Lendingtree, Inc, 425 F.3d 211, 214 (3d Cir. 2005)������� 199–200
CLS Bank v Alice Corp 573 US 208 (2014)����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 220
Comm for Idaho’s High Desert, Inc v Yost, 92 F.3d 814, 819–20 (9th Cir. 1996)�������������201–2
Compaq Computer Corp v Procom Tech, Inc, 908 F. Supp. 1409, 1423
(S.D. Tex. 1995)������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 209
Feist Publications, Inc., v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 US 340 [1991] ����������������������� 527
G & C Merriam Co v Syndicate Pub Co, 237 US 618, 622 (1915)����������������������������������������� 186
Gemmer v Surrey Services for Seniors, Inc., No 10–810, 2010 WL 5129241,
at *20 (E.D. Pa. 13 December 2010)��������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 202
Google LLC v Oracle America, Inc., Docket No. 18–956, Petition for a Writ
of Certiorari (US 24 January 2019)������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 76
Google LLC v Oracle Am., Inc., 593 US _, 141 S. Ct. 1183, Docket No. 18–956, (2021) �������� 76
Google LLC v Oracle America, Inc., 593 US _, 141 S. Ct. 1183, Docket No. 18–956,
Opinion of the Court at 15 (5 April 2021)�������������������������������������������������������������77–79, 80
Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v Nation Enterprises 471 US 539, 558 (1985) �������������������8–9
Haughton Elevator Co v Seeberger, 85 USPQ 80 (Comm’r Pat 1950) ��������������������������������� 197
Jacobsen v Katzer, No. 06–CV-01905 JSW, 2007 WL 2358628 (N.D.Cal. 17 August 2007) ��������103–4
Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2008)�������������������������������������������������� 86–87, 103–4
Liebowitz v Elsevier Sci Ltd, 927 F. Supp. 688, 696 (SDNY 1996)�������������������������������������202–3
LunaTrex, LLC v Cafasso, 674 F. Supp. 2d 1060, 1062 (S.D. Ind. 2009) ���������������������������202–3
National Comics Publications, Inc. v Fawcett Publications, Inc. 191 F.2d 594, 90 USPQ 274�����������17
Neo4j, Inc v PureThink, LLC, 480 F.Supp.3d 1071 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2020)����������� 196–97, 206
Neo4j, Inc. v PureThink, LLC, No. 5:18–CV-07182–EJD, 2021 WL 2483778
(N.D. Cal. 18 May 2021) ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 206
xxxvi Table of Cases
New Kids on the Block v News Am Publ’g, Inc, 971 F.2d 302, 308 (9th Cir.1992)��������������� 205
Nissen Trampoline Co v Am Trampoline Co, 193 F. Supp. 745, 129 USPQ 210
(S.D. Iowa 1961)����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 197
Oracle Am., Inc. v Google LLC, 750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014)��������������������������������������������� 76
Oracle America, Inc. v Google, Inc., 872 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2012),
rev’d and remanded, 750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014), cert. denied,
135 S. Ct. 2887 (2015)����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5, 76, 410–11
Oracle America, Inc. v Google LLC, 886 F.3d 1179 (Fed. Cir. 2018) ������������������������������������� 76
Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs Corp, 287 F.2d 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961)��������������������������������� 194
Sega Enterprises Ltd v Accolade Inc., 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) ����������������������������� 80, 209
Sebastian Int’l Inc v Longs Drugs Stores Corp, 53 F.3d 1073, 1076 (9th Cir. 1995)������������� 199
Shain Inv Co v Cohen, 443 N.E.2d 126, 129 (Mass. App. Ct. 1982) ���������������������������������201–2
SoftMan Products Co., LLC v Adobe Systems, Inc. (2001) 171 F.Supp.2d 1075�������������26–27
Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. v Vizio, Inc. Case No. 8:21–cv-01943,
Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court (C. D. Cal. 29 November 2021)
(Vizio federal case)������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 106
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. Case No. 1:16–cv-00116–RGA
(D. Del. 2019)���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������250–51
Sound View Innovations, LLC v Hulu, LLC, Case No. 2:17–cv-04146–JAK-PLA
(C. D. Cal. 2017)�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������250–51
Sound View Innovations, LLC v Sling TV LLC, Case No. 1:19–cv-03709–CMA-SKC
(D. Col. 2019)���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������250–51
Sound View Innovations, LLC v Hulu LLC, Case: 19–1865 (Fed. Cir. 2 July 2020)��������� 250–51
St. Denis Parish v Van Straten, Cancellation No 92051378, 2011 WL 5014036,
at *4 (TTAB 28 September 2011)������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 202
State Street Bank & Trust v Signature Financial Services 149 F.3d 1368
(Fed Cir 1998) cert denied; 525 U.S. 1093 (1999)�����������������������������������������������������219–20
Tiffany (NJ) Inc v eBay Inc, 600 F.3d 93, 102 (2d Cir. 2010) ������������������������������������������������� 205
UMG Recordings, Inc. v Augusto 628 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2011) �������������������������������������26–27
United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S._, 141 S.Ct. 1970 (2021)�������������������������������������250–51
Universal City Studios, Inc. v Corley 273 F.3d 429 (2nd Cir. 2001) ��������������������������������������� 10
Wallace v Free Software Foundation Inc. (case no. 1:05–cv-00618–JDT-TAB) �������������126–27, 372
White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v Apollo Co., 209 US 1 (1908)���������������������������������72–73
Wofford v Apple Inc. (2011)(Case No 11–CV-0034 AJB NLS—unreported)������������������������ 6
Zino Davidoff SA v CVS Corp., 571 F.3d 238, 243 (2d Cir. 2009)����������������������������������������� 200
Table of Legislation
your curriculum for the non-coding aspects of Open Source. There is no better
source today. There is no similar text. It is also a gift to communities and businesses
on their journey through Open Source maturation and learning how to curate
their Open Source software.
This book is a one-off. It would take decades to pull together the experience to
create a similar work. I will not edit a third version alone, as I could never have
foreseen the scale of work involved, and any future versions will be edited with
co-editors only.
Thank you to all of the Open Source projects who have allowed us to use their
logos for the cover. I love that we were able to make this happen.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
“Look Ellie let’s have another cocktail.”
“Allright.”
“I must get hold of him and get some stories about bootleggers
out of him.”
When he stretched his legs out under the table he touched her
feet. She drew them away. Jimmy could feel his jaws chewing, they
clanked so loud under his cheeks he thought Ellie must hear them.
She sat opposite him in a gray tailoredsuit, her neck curving up
heartbreakingly from the ivory V left by the crisp frilled collar of her
blouse, her head tilted under her tight gray hat, her lips made up;
cutting up little pieces of meat and not eating them, not saying a
word.
“Gosh ... let’s have another cocktail.” He felt paralyzed like in a
nightmare; she was a porcelaine figure under a bellglass. A current
of fresh snowrinsed air from somewhere eddied all of a sudden
through the blurred packed jangling glare of the restaurant, cut the
reek of food and drink and tobacco. For an instant he caught the
smell of her hair. The cocktails burned in him. God I dont want to
pass out.
Sitting in the restaurant of the Gare de Lyon, side by side on the
black leather bench. His cheek brushes hers when he reaches to put
herring, butter, sardines, anchovies, sausage on her plate. They eat
in a hurry, gobbling, giggling, gulp wine, start at every screech of an
engine....
The train pulls out of Avignon, they two awake, looking in each
other’s eyes in the compartment full of sleep-sodden snoring people.
He lurches clambering over tangled legs, to smoke a cigarette at the
end of the dim oscillating corridor. Diddledeump, going south,
Diddledeump, going south, sing the wheels over the rails down the
valley of the Rhone. Leaning in the window, smoking a broken
cigarette, trying to smoke a crumbling cigarette, holding a finger over
the torn place. Glubglub glubglub from the bushes, from the
silverdripping poplars along the track.
“Ellie, Ellie there are nightingales singing along the track.”
“Oh I was asleep darling.” She gropes to him stumbling across the
legs of sleepers. Side by side in the window in the lurching jiggling
corridor.
Deedledeump, going south. Gasp of nightingales along the track
among the silverdripping poplars. The insane cloudy night of
moonlight smells of gardens garlic rivers freshdunged field roses.
Gasp of nightingales.
Opposite him the Elliedoll was speaking. “He says the
lobstersalad’s all out.... Isnt that discouraging?”
Suddenly he had his tongue. “Gosh if that were the only thing.”
“What do you mean?”
“Why did we come back to this rotten town anyway?”
“You’ve been burbling about how wonderful it was ever since we
came back.”
“I know. I guess it’s sour grapes.... I’m going to have another
cocktail.... Ellie for heaven’s sake what’s the matter with us?”
“We’re going to be sick if we keep this up I tell you.”
“Well let’s be sick.... Let’s be good and sick.”
When they sit up in the great bed they can see across the harbor,
can see the yards of a windjammer and a white sloop and a red and
green toy tug and plainfaced houses opposite beyond a peacock
stripe of water; when they lie down they can see gulls in the sky. At
dusk dressing rockily, shakily stumbling through the mildewed
corridors of the hotel out into streets noisy as a brass band, full of
tambourine rattle, brassy shine, crystal glitter, honk and whir of
motors.... Alone together in the dusk drinking sherry under a broad-
leaved plane, alone together in the juggled particolored crowds like
people invisible. And the spring night comes up over the sea terrible
out of Africa and settles about them.
They had finished their coffee. Jimmy had drunk his very slowly
as if some agony waited for him when he finished it.
“Well I was afraid we’d find the Barneys here,” said Ellen.
“Do they know about this place?”
“You brought them here yourself Jimps.... And that dreadful
woman insisted on talking babies with me all the evening. I hate
talking babies.”
“Gosh I wish we could go to a show.”
“It would be too late anyway.”
“And just spending money I havent got.... Lets have a cognac to
top off with. I don’t care if it ruins us.”
“It probably will in more ways than one.”
“Well Ellie, here’s to the breadwinner who’s taken up the white
man’s burden.”
“Why Jimmy I think it’ll be rather fun to have an editorial job for a
while.”
“I’d find it fun to have any kind of job.... Well I can always stay
home and mind the baby.”
“Dont be so bitter Jimmy, it’s just temporary.”
“Life’s just temporary for that matter.”
The taxi drew up. Jimmy paid him with his last dollar. Ellie had her
key in the outside door. The street was a confusion of driving
absintheblurred snow. The door of their apartment closed behind
them. Chairs, tables, books, windowcurtains crowded about them
bitter with the dust of yesterday, the day before, the day before that.
Smells of diapers and coffeepots and typewriter oil and Dutch
Cleanser oppressed them. Ellen put out the empty milkbottle and
went to bed. Jimmy kept walking nervously about the front room. His
drunkenness ebbed away leaving him icily sober. In the empty
chamber of his brain a doublefaced word clinked like a coin: Success
Failure, Success Failure.
G
lowworm trains shuttle in the gloaming
through the foggy looms of spiderweb
bridges, elevators soar and drop in their
shafts, harbor lights wink.
Like sap at the first frost at five o’clock
men and women begin to drain gradually out
of the tall buildings downtown, grayfaced
throngs flood subways and tubes, vanish
underground.
All night the great buildings stand quiet
and empty, their million windows dark.
Drooling light the ferries chew tracks across
the lacquered harbor. At midnight the
fourfunneled express steamers slide into the
dark out of their glary berths. Bankers
blearyeyed from secret conferences hear the
hooting of the tugs as they are let out of side
doors by lightningbug watchmen; they settle
grunting into the back seats of limousines,
and are whisked uptown into the Forties,
clinking streets of ginwhite whiskey-yellow
ciderfizzling lights.
The diningroom smelled of toast and coffee and the New York
Times. The Merivales were breakfasting to electric light. Sleet beat
against the windows. “Well Paramount’s fallen off five points more,”
said James from behind the paper.
“Oh James I think its horrid to be such a tease,” whined Maisie
who was drinking her coffee in little henlike sips.
“And anyway,” said Mrs. Merivale, “Jack’s not with Paramount any
more. He’s doing publicity for the Famous Players.”
“He’s coming east in two weeks. He says he hopes to be here for
the first of the year.”
“Did you get another wire Maisie?”
Maisie nodded. “Do you know James, Jack never will write a
letter. He always telegraphs,” said Mrs. Merivale through the paper
at her son. “He certainly keeps the house choked up with flowers,”
growled James from behind the paper.
“All by telegraph,” said Mrs. Merivale triumphantly.
James put down his paper. “Well I hope he’s as good a fellow as
he seems to be.”
“Oh James you’re horrid about Jack.... I think it’s mean.” She got
to her feet and went through the curtains into the parlor.
“Well if he’s going to be my brother-in-law, I think I ought to have a
say in picking him,” he grumbled.
Mrs. Merivale went after her. “Come back and finish your
breakfast Maisie, he’s just a terrible tease.”
“I wont have him talk that way about Jack.”
“But Maisie I think Jack’s a dear boy.” She put her arm round her
daughter and led her back to the table. “He’s so simple and I know
he has good impulses.... I’m sure he’s going to make you very
happy.” Maisie sat down again pouting under the pink bow of her
boudoir cap. “Mother may I have another cup of coffee?”
“Deary you know you oughtnt to drink two cups. Dr. Fernald said
that was what was making you so nervous.”
“Just a little bit mother very weak. I want to finish this muffin and I
simply cant eat it without something to wash it down, and you know
you dont want me to lose any more weight.” James pushed back his
chair and went out with the Times under his arm. “It’s half past eight
James,” said Mrs. Merivale. “He’s likely to take an hour when he gets
in there with that paper.”
“Well,” said Maisie peevishly. “I think I’ll go back to bed. I think it’s
silly the way we all get up to breakfast. There’s something so vulgar
about it mother. Nobody does it any more. At the Perkinses’ it comes
up to you in bed on a tray.”
“But James has to be at the bank at nine.”
“That’s no reason why we should drag ourselves out of bed.
That’s how people get their faces all full of wrinkles.”
“But we wouldn’t see James until dinnertime, and I like to get up
early. The morning’s the loveliest part of the day.” Maisie yawned
desperately.
James appeared in the doorway to the hall running a brush round
his hat.
“What did you do with the paper James?”
“Oh I left it in there.”
“I’ll get it, never mind.... My dear you’ve got your stickpin in
crooked. I’ll fix it.... There.” Mrs. Merivale put her hands on his
shoulders and looked in her son’s face. He wore a dark gray suit with
a faint green stripe in it, an olive green knitted necktie with a small
gold nugget stickpin, olive green woolen socks with black clockmarks
and dark red Oxford shoes, their laces neatly tied with doubleknots
that never came undone. “James arent you carrying your cane?” He
had an olive green woolen muffler round his neck and was slipping
into his dark brown winter overcoat. “I notice the younger men down
there dont carry them, mother ... People might think it was a little ... I
dont know ...”
“But Mr. Perkins carries a cane with a gold parrothead.”
“Yes but he’s one of the vicepresidents, he can do what he likes....
But I’ve got to run.” James Merivale hastily kissed his mother and
sister. He put on his gloves going down in the elevator. Ducking his
head into the sleety wind he walked quickly east along
Seventysecond. At the subway entrance he bought a Tribune and
hustled down the steps to the jammed soursmelling platform.